Added: 4 years ago
From: spitfirehaga
Views: 159,780
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (458)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Beautiful tank, no dispute! Come check out my channel! I upload informative videos every Friday on pretty much any vehicle and weapon!

  • 4th generation? This isn't a fourth Generation tank, neither is AMX-56 Leclerc, Challenger 2, Leoaprd2, or M1 Abrams. Those are all Generation 3. You base a tank's generation off the technology it equips, such as APS, composite armour, modern FCS, etc etc etc. 

  • @FailcardT72 M4 CZ

    M4 - 4th modernization

    CZ - czech modernization

    It has APS, composite armor on tower, radiation measurement tools, different engine, transmition, stabilized gun, etc. What reamains is chasis, basic hull, turret and gun (125mm)

  • @HowkeyLL The video poster says it's a fourth generation tank like Challenger 2, M1 Abrams, Amx-56 Leclerc, T-90, Leopard 2, etc.

    However, all those technologies you posted are 3 generation technologies, being as similar technology's are found on other modern tanks. So this beefed up T-72 is a third generation at best.

  • Fajnie. Pozdro z Polski. Czescy bracia.

  • Kde zmilo 5000 tanku z CSLA.? Prizpusobivi je zrejmne darovali komancum v USA.Je to zaracny tank jen ho nesmite nechat nekde v noci zaparkovany bez hlidky jinak by ste museli hledat u obchodniku se starym zelezem. Bojove vlastnosit toho tanku umoznuji dokonce bojovat proti neprizpusobivym vyzbrojenech pouze macetami.At zije mir. Asiatsti obchodnici prodvaji macety made in China.

  • Lol, steel coffin for a tankists.

    Poor Czech army and economy.

  • Ta vlajka NATO to kazí!

  • Russian tanks are disgrace , they are only good as target practice for US/Western tankers and A-10 pilots.

    Russian tanks are only good for laugh.

  • @ViciousCritique you mean the US tank that is too fragile to have a dozer blade? The one that can't fire HE or frag shells? The one that has no jamming systems whatsoever? The one that needs more hours on maintenance than it can operate? The one that literally fell through a bridge because it is the fattest tank in the world? The one that has worse fuel economy than any other tank in existence? The one that needs an entire minute to start the engine? That "great" tank?

  • @AKAtheA Jesus christ , its russian garbage u should buy real tanks from the west .........Challenger 2 , Leopard , Abrams , etc.. russian tanks are pathetic .

    No idea why u are still worshiping those fucking russian scumbags.

  • @ViciousCritique ummm, they were license built in Czechoslovakia, the M4 is basically comparable to the T-90, which is also a heavily modernized T-72...As for what I've seen, the Abrams is...well...shit. Brits won't sell the Challenger 2 and the Leopard 2 (even the A6) is getting old...currently the T-90 is the newest of active tanks.

    Maybe if we convinced the Israeli to sell us some Mercavas mk.4 :D Then again, we have nothing to pay with for them... care to buy a few Gypsys? Those we have..

  • @AKAtheA Wrong , T90 is the biggest piece of shit out there ...its disgrace to call such a tank modern .

    M1A2SEP , Challenger 2 the most heavily armored platforms with massive punch . That tanks will have a easy time with your russian garbage , seriously throw them away and buy REAL tanks from the west.

  • @ViciousCritique 1) the M1A2SEP is a shit tank with a third service pack...took them only 2 versions to find out, that leaving an APU outside the armor is bad thing... you can keep that crap, I wonder what critical problems will come up with the SEP...

    2) To buy any reasonable amount of tanks, we'd need money we don't have...because we can't sell weapons to "bad countries", we can't sell any of the current tanks...why throw away something that works?

    3) Brits will not sell the Chally 2...

  • @AKAtheA M1A2 is superior tank to anything russian fucks got ........

    Russian "tanks" are insult to all the REAL tanks ....and all of them comes from the West ...no from some 3rd world shithole somewhere in the east called russia.

  • @ViciousCritique ability to use dozer blade -none, if you try to, it breaks down... ability to shoot HE, HESH or any other anti-building round - none... ; ability to shoot antipersonell rounds at distance - none, ability to detect and/or jam ATGMs - none, ability to cross a normal bridge - you wish, at 72+ tons, it's a lottery with 4 lives...

    Oh yeah, keep telling yourself that the M1A2 is the best in the world, I'll laugh my ass off if there's ever a war against an equal enemy...

  • @AKAtheA There is no equal enemy for the USA.

  • @ViciousCritique a) China b) Russia c) a coalition of several middle-eastern states...

  • @AKAtheA Haha ....are u serious ??? USA technologically surpass all of them .

    U can worship russian losers how much u want but it wont change the fact  that USA is superior to your russian buddies.

  • @ViciousCritique surpasses how? In a few years, China will literally OWN USA, Russia is more than equal in military technology, as a bonus both China and Russia own shitloads of nuclear weapons...

    Also, there's a very good reason why the USA don't dare attack Iran and other "bad" states, and it isn't because of a few hypothetical ICBMs with questionable acurancy which can't even reach the US territory...

    p.s. The Czechs (me included) HATE Russians, we have more than one reason to do so...

  • @ViciousCritique about having an easy time - it's easy pummeling stripped out obsolete (Polish built) Russian tanks, the Asad Babil is an Iraq copy (with Iraq quality)...

    Against tanks that can a) fire on the move b) actually hit the target while doing so c) have the ammo to punch through c) detect the laser rangefinder ALL western tanks use d) jam the rangefinder (try hitting something without your firecontrol sys., ha-ha) e) detect and jam most optically guided missiles (M1A can't)

  • @AKAtheA Face it already M1A2 Abrams will mock any russian tank u can imagine. Including your Czech-Russian piece of shit T72M4 .

    Not to mention shitty armor of russian tanks (including your pathetic M4) .

  • @ViciousCritique the M4CZ doesn't use Russian armor...

    Like I've said before, if US is ever going to try against a country with modern weapons, like say Iran, I'll laugh my ass off once the Abrams shows it's battle "performance"...

  • @AKAtheA U wont be laughing because Abrams will crush anything in its path.

  • @AKAtheA Top 3 Tanks in world is Korean tank made in germany.. then german leos and then russian T-80 witch is fact sry to say but americans ambraham is hardly getting in top 10 xD...make your facts then bitch around

  • @BWLOLMonk T-90 i ment xD

  • @BWLOLMonk

    lol, gamer kid. You know nothing about tanks.

    US Defense Budget: $692,000,000,000

    Russia Defense Budget: $56,000,000,000

    All said.

  • @buymeamic sadly the money spent on education is opposite (and no, im not russian)

  • @HowkeyLL

    But US Universities are best in the world.

    Yep, it costs pretty much, but it's da best.

    Just come here in Russia and watch all shit that happens here, u'll be surprised how this real country differs from propaganda.

    (And yes i'm russian).

  • @buymeamic i know that higher education is not that good but im talking about general education. Yes its pitty that in Russia there still is propaganda (i sometimes watch RT just for fun). Im just trying to point out that "the gods best democracy" how they call themself is not that shiny either.

  • @HowkeyLL

    World is not shiny. It's a real life here and somebody need to eat, somebody wants to be eaten :)

  • @buymeamic I think, US Universities arent the best, Europe is still center of knowledge.

  • @buymeamic lol you are sad :) nobody cares how much you give to military. I dont care if some old abraham or some russian tank is better.. this vid is about CZECH T tank not russian even and still leopard would kick abrahams ass anytime as it suprass the tank in evry aspect

    All said. :)

  • @BWLOLMonk misclick? That's what I've spamming the comments with past several weeks...

  • We Czechs are quite proud people, and understandably upset when our tank, we worked 7 years, someone will call shit. So the next time you're bored, don't cut to the quick. Buy 2A6 stupidity would not only economically, but also tactically. If we can produce your own hands fast, agile and extremely protected (T72M4 CZ virtually parallels Merkava in terms of crew protection) tank of its own production, we'd better do it.

  • Respect From Romania !

  • xD Americans are funny. "look I am from USA, I am the best!!" xD funny fools... Your M1A1 is piece of shit just like M4 Sherman alias Tommycooker

  • @3DSFuture

    You are shit !

  • @3DSFuture hahah, Polish-American piece of shit again. You're funny actualy.

  • @wassupMannn In World War III Czechs would be capitulate in 32 seconds

  • @3DSFuture no doubt.. keep dreamin douchbag

  • @3DSFuture We'll see when China decides.

  • check Polish version of upgraded T72 -  PT 91 - "twardy" ( "hard","tough" or "resilient")

  • tzv. lehký cíl

  • Great tank! Low profile and very agile ! A real winner of the COLD WAR! Even now a one of the best!

  • Russian junk.

  • :)

  • krasava

    

  • Zkus si vystrelit z pistole pod vodou a pak si predstav co to udela, kdyz tam te vymetne smesi je nekolik set krat tolik :)

  • CZECH TANK ???? ITS RUSSIAN TANK NO CZECH TANK

  • @PEDROZSANCHEZ Basis is T72, but these tanks were produced in Czechoslovakia in license and today they are upgraded to M4CZ version.

  • @PEDROZSANCHEZ if It is T-72 owned by the Czech Army, then it's a Czech T-72. If it was owned by the Mongolian Army, then it would be a Mongolian T-72, if it was owned by the Martians it would be Martian T-72, is that clear enough for you?

  • lol t-72 with nato flag,wrong...

  • «объект 172М». 7 августа 1973 г.СССР на вооружение Советской Армии был принят танк Т-72.мощностью 573 кВт (780 л.с.) , автоматом заряжания пушки на 22 выстрела и вентиляторной системой охлаждения1979г модернизация танка Т-72 Основные отличи лазерный прицел-дальномер ночной прицел наводчика с осветителем сплошные бортовые противокумулятивные экраны пушка 2А46 (вместо пушки 2А26М2)система 902Б запуска дымовых гранат, система защиты от напалма система дорожной сигнализации ночной прибор ТВНЕ-4Б

  • hej ja nwm co tady řesite..by se meli vysrat na vsechno upa=D..ted kdyz bude valka..americani vyslou par atomovek a je hotovo..a neni o cem..

  • @antislavista7 Mno, nejsem si jistej že by se nekdo odvažil někam hazet atomovky. To by byla sebevražda.

    btw. tančík dobrej ;)

  • pekny tank.

    moze tank strielat pod hladinou?

  • @dodoslovensko pokud je pod hladinou korba a vez nad vodou, tak muze. Kdyby mel ponorenou i hlaven tak to nadela poradnej bordel.

  • @xmeda proč by to mělo nadělat bordel? :-D

  • @xmeda cize veza nemoze bit pod hladinou ,pretoze nabojnica sa automaticky vyhadzuje zo zadnej casti veze?

    = voda bi vosla dnu.

    alebo pretoze pri strele vznika nejaky pretlak vo vezi ktori moze unikat iba ,, na suchu,,?

    ja viem blbe otazky ,ale ja som sa na vojne vozil iba v BVPcku. ,,,bigos polny,,,

  • omg cesi by nemeli plitvat prachamy za modernyzaci t-72 a raci koupit leopard 2a6 ten patri mezi nejlepsi tanky!!!!!!!!

  • @MrLormes češi by neměli plýtvat za nákup cizích zbraní a když už vyrobit si je sami.Naše zbraně dosahovali vždy jedné z nejvyšších kvalit... Bohužel papá demokracie šecko zlikvidovala.

  • @czechoslovakpatriot hehe za první republiky jsme měli taky dost kvalitní armádu, né jak za socializmu skoro vše přebráno od sovětů...... teď se to opakuje, ale první republika byla jedinečná (Bren,....)

  • @lukinexCZ skoro všechno... Až na SA.58 ,vz.59, Škorpióna, stíhačky L-29 delfín,39 albatros, 159 ALCA.. A tank T-72 CZ je taky vyroben u nás.Sice vychází ze sovětské konstrukce, ale je značně urpavený.

    A nemyslíš náhodou lehký kulomet vz.26? Z něho se vyvinul BREN ;-)

  • @MrLormes když seš takovej čech, tak se prvně nauč česky...

  • @MrLormes Podívej se na to ze strategického hlediska. Je lepší mít vlastní zbraň vyrobenou svými postupy, než zbran koupit od POTENCIONÁLNÍHO nepřítele, který tu kterou tobě prodá zná líp, jelikož ji sám stvořil. Leopard je nejlepší tank na světě, to ano, ale věděl jsi že česká modernizace T-72 patří do první osmičky nejlepších tanků na světě, jako Abrams, Merkava, Chalenger nebo T-90

  • @TheSargerasss

    mohl bys zveřejnit kde si našel ty informace ohledně té "nejlepší osmičky" nikde sem to nenašel a rád bych se tím pokochal

  • The Czechs shouldn't waste money in modernizing this crap, they should just use the Leopard 2A6 more (because the best tanks in the world today are the German Leopard 2A6 and the Israeli Merkava 4).

  • @TheDudeReborn

    no, it's the British Challenger 2. it has the strongest armour.

  • @TheDudeReborn Look at it from a strategic perspective. It is better to have made​his own gun practice, than to buy a gun from a potential enemy that you sell that you know better, since he himself created. Leopard is the best tank in the world, yes, but did you know that the modernization of the Czech T-72 among the top eight best tanks in the world, alongside Abrams, Merkava, Chalenger or T-90

  • @TheSargerasss I agree, except when you say it is in the top 8, it is not. It is very good to have national made military goods in your own country, so that you are more independent, besides you can always add some foreign made stuff to complement what you can't make anyway, so it is a good choice. The Czech is T-72 is pratical and reliable, and relatively cheap compared to other MBT's which are ridiculously expensive, so it is good for a small country to mass-produce.

  • @TheDudeReborn You should know that the development of T-72 M4 Czech closely cooperated with Israel. T72M4 is a variant of a Combining a large number of advanced features for tanks 4th generation. Yes, T72M4 can boldly stand alongside the best of the North Atlantic tanks. Certainly it is not shit as you called it.

  • @TheSargerasss First, I made that comment because I was bored, second it is good but not nearly as goods as a Leopard 2A6 for example, the T72M4 is good for economical reasons the L2A6 is good for total effectiveness

  • Hahaha cesi jste normalni rusky tank s vlajkou nato,prestante zrat knedliky a premyslite hlavou idioti

  • @NoRVaN111 Tento tank je sice T 72, ale byl vyrobený celý v Československu, po modernizaci má izraelský motor, italský systém řízení palby, prodloužený dostřel atd.

    Opravdu si myslíš, že je to ruský tank?

  • @dehylov

    omyl motor je britský dvanáctiválec se dvěma turby s výkonem něco okolo 735kw

  • @Rades1988 hej tak ty seš taky dobrej maník,tank T-72M4 má motor Condor CV-12-1000TCA s výkonem 887 kW ,který sestrojila izraelská firma Nimda,tak nevím kdes vyhrabal brity.

  • @Bohemian147

    Koukni na "Pozor, jede tank - T72 M4CZ - Roadlook TV"

  • @NoRVaN111 Jsi tupej looser tenhle tank je uplne predelanej.Nez neco zacnes kvakt ty chudaku precti si o tom neco!

  • @MegaK4rl Jses uplně zajebanej NATO gay

  • @NoRVaN111 Děkuju, jsem za to rád ty chudáku.

  • spasibo brate we will be back in soon and smash them for once and for all kill em all with the red fist of the workers class and the support of all people around the world who live right now under the capitalist slavery SLAVA CCCP

  • s těma pár šrotama by neubránili ani Kozí hrádek,když maj letět do afgánu tak půlka z těch našich hrdinů má žaluděční a bůh ví jaké ještě jiné potíže...děte si honit péra na Bahna na to vám ty vaše hračky jedině sou,idioti zelený.

  • @Zedinek Normálně takhle nepíšu, ale jsi debil!

  • fuck you too bled

  • Aspoň, že máme tu jednu Merkavu v Lešanech... Jinak těch 13 modernizovanejch T72, bo kolik jich přesně je, nás nevytrhne...

  • shit traiter go to the NATO bitches and die for them we soviets will never give up and If that cause is real to fight our brothers we will smash them for sure

  • @detlev07 get a life

  • @detlev07 Truly a sad day when the mighty Soviet Union was no more, im just happy that Russia under Putin has regained its rightful place a major if not, super power once again. We in the Middle East support Russia and view mother Russia has an ally and the view the Americans as our enemies.

  • L0L, sovětský tank s vlajkou NATO. Co vy na to ?

    Radši NEto.

  • American Tune, Commie Tank, You see we can get along....

  • @3shacks1house A heavily modified commie tank :D

  • T72 is an old knight, but still powerful.

  • diky rusum ze mame lepsi tank nez america =)

  • @TheMorgon2009 T-72 jakkoli zmodernizovana rozhodne neni lepsi nez jakakoli verze M1 Abrams.V poustni bouri kde staly T-72 proti M1 nebyl znicen ani jeden M1.

  • @Petersonbb Americké tanky disponovali jednou obrovskou výhodou.Vlastně byli dvě,ale budeme počítat jenom jednu.Ta první byla v nočním vidění a ta druhá v munici s ochuzeným uranem,nepočítám jí,protože ji přece nepoužívali,i když potom umřelo několik desítek Italských vojáků na ozáření.

  • Fajny czolg ale modernizacja wyszla bardzo droga i dlatego nie ma ich wiele w czeskiej armii.

  • music fits nicely

  • Proti letectvu si dnes neškrtá žádnej moderní i nemoderní tank, za pár vteřin je po všem a je jedno jestli je to tak ze včerejška, nebo z doby před 40 lety.

  • @Haneson

    Předpokládáš, že by nějaký generál poslal své tanky na území, kde má vzdušnou převahu nepřítel. Předpokládáš špatně.

    Tanky mají nezastupitelnou úlohu i v dnešních konfliktech.

  • všichni tu zapomínáte na jednu věc - každá zbraň je jen tak dobrá, jak dobře s ní umí ten či onen zacházet a jak je s ní vycvičen, dejte amatérovi nuklearní zbraň a vycvičenému vojákovi samopal a vsadím se, že vyhraje ten voják, dejte amatérovi - dejme tomu i M1A1 Abrahams, či třeba Merkavu 3 za pár mega dolarů a skvěle vycvičenému bigošovi RPG 7 za pár korun a jak to asi dopadne ...

  • @Apokalyptik1 M1A1 je Abrams nikoli Abrahams :)

  • armádu moderní a schopnou, nebo radši žádnou

  • satans tank

  • starej dobrej T72 je dobrej dneska už jen jako dražší a trochu chytřejší samohybnej kanon na kratší vzdálenosti.

    Je to 40 let starej krám... bez ohledu na modernizace, prostě si dneska už moc neškrtá ani proti tankům. Natož letectvu...

  • @HergotH01 tak proti letectvu si myslim že neškrtá víc tanků.

  • @HergotH01 To je vidět že tomuz hovno rozumíš ty pako

  • @HergotH01

    Chalpe, s touhle kráskou jezdim už nějakej ten rok a můžu ti říct, škrtá si, a hodně. stále je lepší než nějaké ty hnusné americké M1A1 :D tohle není ten starý sovětský krám, tohle je český tank. Český !!! ano má tam ten název T72 a vypadá tak, ale to je asi všechno :P

  • @HergotH01 jo a mimochodem, víš kdo jediněj si může škrtnout proti letectvu?

    Zsu - 23 Shilka, myslíš si snad že tank dokáže sestřelit stíhačku? :D to co si řekl je absolutní hovno, možná ještě větší než to co jsem nechali rusům když odsud odjížděli a nechávali nám tu všechno :D

  • @KiraxMoran

    Při pomalejším letu stíhačky může T-90 značně poškodit kulometem (12,7 mm).

  • yes!czech is my country!too bad i dont speak czech, so i have no idea what these people are saying!

  • @Assass1nat3d

    Bullshits ;-D

  • Najlepse tanky na svete su T-90 , Leopart 2A, M1A2 Abrams

  • Za první republiky jsme vyráběli nejlepší tanky na světě a kvůli tomu ****** Havlovi musíme kopírovat nějaké Ruské šroty

  • @Taskoo123

    Prey šroty . . . .

  • Bude kruté voči bratom čo teraz poviem ale je to len pravda a dosť ma to mrzí.

    Keď sa ČSR rozdelovalo tak sa delilo 2 ku 1 takže nás "pán" Havel vybrakovl ako samoobsluhu, pobral najlpšie stroje zo Slovenska do Čiech a tu na videu máte výsledok tých strojov. Martinské stroje ktoré kedysi u nás robili tanky T-72. Teraz na slovenských strojoch robia Češi. Presne ako TAZ dodávka. Po rozdelení ju odkúpila Škoda, stroje šli do Čiech a nejaký čas sa robila tam.

  • Mozna te to prekvapi, ale vojenska technika se delila podle poctu obyvatel, tzn. pomer 2:1 je v poradku. Teda bylo i par vyjimek - pro Migy 29 byl ten pomer z nejakeho zvlastniho duvodu 1:1, slovensko tez dostalo jediny system S300.

    Martinske "stroje" jsou stale v Martine, v CR se tanky totiz nevyrabi, jen byly ve VOP modernizovany.

    Hadam ze sis nekde precetl ze cesi si nechali lepsi "stroje" (coz byla v nekterych pripadech skutecne pravda) a chybne si to vylozil jako stroje vyrobni :)

  • Z akého to máš zdroja? Rád by som si to ozaj prečítal. Možno že som ozaj pochybil. Vždy sa rozprávalo o tom, že z Martina sa stroje odniesli do Česka.

  • Tak ono se toho vypravelo a stale vypravi hodne, to ale jeste neznamena, ze je to vsechno pravda :) Faktem je, ze v CR se tanky proste nevyrabi a vyrabet nebudou, modernizace probehla na starsich, v Martine vyrobenych kusech, ktere pripadly CR v ramci deleni federace. Dokonce to vypada, ze byly pouzity dve ruzne verze (M a M1) Pokud nekdo opravdu z Martina ty vyrobni stroje pred rozpadem odvezl (o cemz uprimne pochybuju), tak skoncily nejspis ve srotu.

  • @pelewi 2 :1 se to dělilo asi proto,že poměr Čechů a Slováků je 2:1 :-) proč bysme vám měli dát stejně jako nám,když je nás o tolik víc?na poměr k počtu obyvatel jste tedy dostali stejně a jestli ne,tak to nebylo zas tak katastrofální,navíc to vy jste se chtěli osamostatnit,my ne,tak proč byste podle tebe měli mít dostat ještě víc,než nad poměr?

  • @pelewi jinak samozřejmě nic proti Slovákům nemám :-) mám vás rád,jen nesouhlasím s tvým komentářem

  • @Koubas92CZ Nie nie. Češi a Slováci sa nikdy nechceli osamostatniť. Síce možno niektorí ano. To len Havel a Mečiar sa nemohli zhodnúť akosi. Doteraz otec hovorí že sme sa nemali rozdelovať a otcov kamarát čo býva v Prahe hovorí to isté, že to bola najväčšia blbosť akú len mohli spraviť. A to kvôli jednej pomlčke iba...

  • Buy a new tank, retrain every tank crew in the use of the new tank, that costs a lot of money. Plus, you have to take into account all the new equipment you would have to buy to service your new tank. It would cost more in the long run.

  • @MeHeartsEverything We dont spend so much money on army like USA do... and we dont need them after all... West will try to betray us again and again and so on until something changes.

  • And this tank is only example what i have been talking about. Why upgrading something what is outdated ??? T-72 in his era was a great tank but time is moving on aswell as engineering there are now better modern tanks. OK this czech version is "upgraded" ,but its still T-72......... , I am pretty sure if Czech Republic wish to buy some NATO tanks ,they would get a chance to buy them.But leaders of country rather prefered putting plenty of money to upgrading old machine.

  • @Vykuk123 : a k cemu prosimte? vis kolik stoji takovej Leopard, Challanger, nebo neco podobnyho? kde bysme na takovy tanky asi vzali :D

  • @KarlosTheMighty Modernizace 30ks T72M na verzi T72M4CZ stála daňové poplatníky cca stejně, kolik by stál nákup nových 30ks M1A2 Abramas.

  • @cejkis To opravdu vážně ??? , jestli ano potom nemám slov , když se podívám na náš "super tank" a M1 Abrams už od pohledu jde vidět rozdíl a 30 kousků M1A2 to už je něco .

  • @Vykuk123

    Cena se uvádí 150 milionů za prvních deset tanků a za kus a u zbylých 120 milionů za kus.

    Za fiskální rok 99 uváděl Pentagon cenu M1A2 USD$6.21 million což je při kurzu 18CZK/USD = 111,78mil CZK.

    Řekněme, že bychom M1A2 koupili o něco dráž než US ARMY a jsme na stejné ceně.........

    Takhle se nakupuje v Armádě České republiky.

  • @cejkis Až na to, že česká národní banka uvádí kurz USD z toho roku cca 35Kč. A zavedení M1A2 by znamenalo další náklady, školení, náhradní součástky atd...

  • @Teorge "Naši případní kupci v zahraničí velmi bedlivě sledují, jak si tank povede v české armádě," potvrdil Veřmiřovský. T-72CZ vyjde přitom až o dvě třetiny levněji než tanky Leopard 2, AMX, Leclerc, Challenger 2, či Abrams M1 A2 jeho cena činí čtyři miliony dolarů (asi 160 milionů korun), přičemž T-72CZ dosahuje téměř shodných parametrů.

    + navíc modernizací se dostali peníze i do českých firem

  • @Teorge

    JJ, to bylo v době, kdy ještě plánovali přes 300ks. Ikdyby jsi počítal s kurzem 35CZK/UDS tak se při finálních počtech vyplatilo koupit nové stroje.

    A o náhradních dílech, to už je ohrané. Vždyť z tanku zbylo jen hrubé železo, vše ostatní je nové a muselo ze zavádět v podobě náhradních dílů. A trampoty s vývojem systému řízení palby, který vyvíjela italská společnost poprvé ve své historii a muselo to několikrát předělávat vše již jen dokresluje.

  • @Teorge

    Je to stejné jako s L-159, také velmi vychvalovaný projekt, ve skutečnosti ovšem neprodejný stroj.

  • Anyways waste of money for this kind of tank , czech republic dont need tanks why ??? If there will be a war since CZ is in NATO , then czech tanks will face a russian tanks ......and they will get slaughtered in first minutes of battle . T-80/90,MI-28/24,SU-25 tank destroyers so many there is ...i only try point out there is no chance for win.Czech army is only one big coruption and wasting of money.

  • @Vykuk123

    You have just badly insulted me and my buddies from the Czech Army. You should not talk about things you do not understand, asshole.

  • Hahah..........what exactly i dont understand huh ?? U mean a inexpedient buying/upgrading of not so good weapons as CZ army think they are??? Look Gripens = Fail , Pandur ?? = fail (They offered to CZ a Piranhas...) , Solding MIG-29 =fail and so on........... are u blind ? its only a wasting of money, but if i am wrong then enlighten me thanks.

  • You did not say in your previous comment that the latest aquisitions were connected with corruption and waste of money. You said that the Czech army is corrupted. You seem to be smart enough to distinguish between politicians, who make the decisions and soldiers who can not influence anything.

    So your comment about the Czech Army being a waste of money is highly offensive to all soldiers. Or did you want to tell me our job is useless?

  • Of course not ,what i want is see czech soldiers in great machines ...... like czech pilots in F-15 / F-18 , Czech armored divison possess Tanks like Challenger , Abrams ....why not ??? Thats my point ...but all what i see is only a stupid buying or useless upgrading for lame weapons this is waste of money ,soldier in this game is only a tool / peon . Politicians are corrupted and are making Czech Army only a worse.I never tryed insulted soldiers , if u are feel insulted then i am sorry.

  • Opinions explained, controversy solved, no offense taken.

    Thanks for support and good bye.

  • What is this nonsense? The T-72 M4 is a fine tank, but there days it is roughly equivalent to the upgraded M60E3 Pattons the US National Guard uses. A T-72 would win precisely zero times out of a hundred against an M1A1 or A2. Chobham armor is already a full generation beyond the 125mm's effectiveness and their accurate range is half that of the M1. Saddam Hussein fielded his "Lion of Babylon" upgraded T-72 in the first and second Iraq wars. They got badly mauled every time they engaged the M1.

  • The main difference between old russian T-72 and this czech renovation is upgrade performance by english COndor motor with automatic american transmission Alisson, upgrade armor to standart NATO and new optics and laseres technologies which make from old T-72 new machine comparable to other modern NATO tank,

  • @Megerazwei but I see many advantages in this tank cause new more modern and faster automatic autoloader and main advantage is cannon 2A46M 125mm which has no problems to dečstroy all tank in the world. And small and not to high siluete make this tank very good

  • This tank is Crap ,czech modified crap.Battallion of these will get sprayed by A-10 gatling cannon and is over .

  • Comment removed

  • @Vykuk123 if you want to capture and secure land you needed tanks, and you say t-72 is a crap, T-72 is one of the best tanks ever build, M1A1 is good against T-55, T-64, but if he go against T-72, T-80, its going to be nightmare for M1A1

  • Thats why M1 Abrams in gulf war slaughter so many T-72 ??? Even IFV Bradley was capable with chain gun pierce through T-72 armor and destroy it.

  • @Vykuk123 you are so sure that Bradley can destroy T-72? Most of iraqi tanks were T-55, T-62, and chinese 59 I think, they had some T-72 but very little and USA have total control on air, and better trained crew, one on one M1A1 and T-72 whit equal trained crew, and same support , M1A1 going to sweat a lot.

  • Nope M1 at 95% will always win against T-72 , however M1 going against T-80 or T-90 ,thats another story.

  • @Vykuk123 That is your opinion, and I maybe not agree but I respected :), and you must agree that T-72 is better on look than M1A1:D

  • Ye i like design of T-72 more then M1 Abrams , all russian tanks are better looking then western tanks.

  • To sou dobré necky toto :D

  • I want one.

  • something like pt 91

  • je to hezke, ale je toho malo na cokoliv krome obtezovani nejake skupiny partizanu... lidovci se v redukci "vyznamenali"...

  • 500 mm (20 in) of 3rd generation composite armour consisting of high hardness steel, tungsten, and plastic filler with ceramic component

    Thats how thick the T-72 armor was compaired to the abrams wtich had Chobham, RH armor, steel encased depleted uranium mesh plating there you go :)

  • cookiemonster, I have a correction, it is not 500mm thick armour, this is an RHAe figure, the Initial Soviet T-72 had approx. 350mm KE RHAe frontal armour protection. Also, I believe the initial model of the M1 Abrams did not have DU meshing and its frontal armour protection was not very impressive at 400mm KE RHAe (compared to the T-80B which had KE RHAe approaching 500mm)

  • However, the M1A1 upgrade was soon developed and the armour protection improved to 500mm RHAe, well beyond the early T-72 and head to head with the T-80B. By the late 1980's both the M1A1 and the T-80 recieved major armour upgrades, the M1A1 was fitted with DU armour mesh and the T-80 recieved several upgrades one of which was the introduction of the K5 armour, the model was called T-80U.

  • The M1A1 protected with DU armour mesh upgrade now had a frontal armour protection of approx. 700mm RHAe and the incorporation of the K5 ERArmour gave the T-80U an armour protection of 800mm KE RHAe, the T-72 also recieved an upgrade which brought it up to 550mm KE RHAe (still behind both the M1A1 and the T-80U). Armour leaped forward again with the introduction of the M1A2 and the T-90.

  • @HansvonEnerich

    Ty jo ty tomu tak všemu rozumíš...ty jsi velkej kluk co kouká hodně na televizi co? A hraje CSko...Bliju z lidí co neuznávají vlast...

  • @Nid98 a Ty tomu rozumis?

  • kdo rika ze tenhle stroj je spatnej tak je nejspis idiot a mel by se jit lecit :-)

  • @hafounCZ Osobně se mi víc líbí slovenská modernizace..

  • this is the current sherman where you gt it.

  • super tank T-72! THE SATAN'S TANK!