I'm a Kings fan, it was a BS call, but it's the Ducks's own fault for painting themselves as a dirty team. The refs call's always seem to go against them. Besides, it doesn't really matter, since the Ducks scored 1 minute later.
This was a really horrible "no goal" call. This has been happening all season long.
To not sound like a Ducks homer or anything, I will point out the May Day "no goal" call in Detroit. If you didn't see that, May shoots the puck and it goes across the goal line. About 3 second later, the ref blows the whistle and washes the goal. Says he had the "intent" to blow. Yeah right, it took him 3 seconds to put the whistle in his mouth and blow??
Bad call yes. Horrible call? No. He was in the crease touching the goalie. Not to mention he was in the crease and pushing back on the goalie before the shot even got thru.
Please. He almost went out of his way to not touch him. He barely did. That's a horrendous call. Refs are supposed to pay attention to the details there. There's minimal contact by Perry and the puck was loose. That ref is a moron.
I think the argument for the refs here is that Perry was in the crease before the initial shot and that's where 'interference' takes place. I dunno. Not a great call, but I don't think it's as horrible as some are making it out to be.
wow what a bad call that was a 100% good goal and am a Kings fan
Unkownperson1313 6 months ago
Comment removed
Unkownperson1313 1 year ago
I'm a Kings fan, it was a BS call, but it's the Ducks's own fault for painting themselves as a dirty team. The refs call's always seem to go against them. Besides, it doesn't really matter, since the Ducks scored 1 minute later.
wontonkings01 1 year ago
i'm a Kings fan and I despise the Ducks but that is a 100% bad call lol
bigguyrobbie 2 years ago
This was a really horrible "no goal" call. This has been happening all season long.
To not sound like a Ducks homer or anything, I will point out the May Day "no goal" call in Detroit. If you didn't see that, May shoots the puck and it goes across the goal line. About 3 second later, the ref blows the whistle and washes the goal. Says he had the "intent" to blow. Yeah right, it took him 3 seconds to put the whistle in his mouth and blow??
gcdrone 2 years ago
Thats one poop sandwich of a call there....maybe the refs are beginning to feel like people pay to see them "play."
Portis1Luv 2 years ago
BS call- Perry gets this all the time doesnt he?
REFyouSUCK 2 years ago
i know!!!!!! i was there last night and everyone around us were screaming (my husband and i were as well).
it was a horrible call but its all good becasue they scored right after that. to bad getzy got hurt on this shot
kellyhrtsacting89 2 years ago
The call wasn't against the Wings or for the Penguins. How will NHL conspiracy nuts put their spin on this one?
TheT4xid3rmist 2 years ago
Bad call yes. Horrible call? No. He was in the crease touching the goalie. Not to mention he was in the crease and pushing back on the goalie before the shot even got thru.
Antihobo71 2 years ago
Please. He almost went out of his way to not touch him. He barely did. That's a horrendous call. Refs are supposed to pay attention to the details there. There's minimal contact by Perry and the puck was loose. That ref is a moron.
ivand87a 2 years ago 3
I think the argument for the refs here is that Perry was in the crease before the initial shot and that's where 'interference' takes place. I dunno. Not a great call, but I don't think it's as horrible as some are making it out to be.
Nicks1225 2 years ago 2
WTF??
AxwellFan 2 years ago
wow those refs are retards.
molls033192 2 years ago
Brett Hull says it's a goal...
heals26 2 years ago
what the hell is happening to the NHL? its becoming a joke, will nothing be done about these horrible calls? they just keep getting more frequent...
supernintendochalmer 2 years ago
he was obviously shuved, terrible call
PerogieBoy714 2 years ago
Yeah, that was bad call, but thank god Koivu got a goal anyway just seconds after that. :)
affro15 2 years ago