for a start the vr6 has a near on 50 percent displacement advantage and having been converted to a turbo setup of course it won against a standard probable 180bhp 1.8t now spend the money that has been spent on that vr6 turbo engine and race again the vr6 would be beaten very easily considering a 400 pound chip and a ko3s turbo(£340) see's u at about 260-270bhp
i know. dudes a douche isnt he. its like he's trying to start a fight or something over the internet. i was just trying to correct someones ridiculous statement and he gets all specific like he did the math or something but then says "about" i dont get it. oh well. some people are just like that.
disghusting
miliwak 1 year ago
mk3>mk2??? O.o
chicaltepetl 1 year ago
for a start the vr6 has a near on 50 percent displacement advantage and having been converted to a turbo setup of course it won against a standard probable 180bhp 1.8t now spend the money that has been spent on that vr6 turbo engine and race again the vr6 would be beaten very easily considering a 400 pound chip and a ko3s turbo(£340) see's u at about 260-270bhp
mr2goodforyou 2 years ago
that mk2 got 260-270 bhp in that video'
1.8t with k04, ecu upgrade and more...
and the turbo kit fot the vr6 didn't cost more than the mk2 engine swap
but mk2 it's a good platform to build a fast ass car
vr6power111 2 years ago 2
Vr6 2.9????
smjakkkk 2 years ago
2.8 12v with GMC savana turbo and stock engine :)
vr6power111 2 years ago
vr6 the best
cafer500cc 3 years ago 2
spanked
s3gf0lt 3 years ago
dude see he missed the 3 or whatever, no power delivered at 6.0 sec from the 1.8
staeivo 4 years ago
close race, 2.8 12 valve versus 1.8 20 valve turbo. I thought the turbo would have beat him but not by much..
MorePOwerplz 4 years ago
for this you called "not by much"? he beat him by very very much! look at the end,and the camera is from behind so do the math.
vr6power111 4 years ago
My bad, your right. It looks like he (Vr6) had almost 2 car lengths at the end.
MorePOwerplz 3 years ago
vr6 is faster than 1.8 t.....
ifukyouintheass 4 years ago
obviously it had work done its a vrt...
ChristopherCliipZ 4 years ago
twice as big yes, but 1.8 should have eaten it. vr6 is a fast motor but not that impressive off the lights. might have had work done
dubnut1990 4 years ago
Have you ever driven a mk3 though? They weigh almost half a tonne more. & that 1.8t engine is gorgeous compared with my VR6!
Harrystoneley 5 years ago
Thats not even a fair race! The VR6's engine is almost twice as big!
back2basix 5 years ago
its actually about 50% bigger.
iwasbornin86 4 years ago
no, its actually about 42% bigger.
chrisgti16v 3 years ago
Pronunciation:\ə-ˈbau̇t\
Function:adverb
Etymology:Middle English, from Old English abūtan, from 1a- + būtan outside — more at but
Date:before 12th century
1 a: reasonably close to
...so i dont know why you disagreed with me.
iwasbornin86 3 years ago 3
good comeback, owned...
chrisgti16v 3 years ago
i know. dudes a douche isnt he. its like he's trying to start a fight or something over the internet. i was just trying to correct someones ridiculous statement and he gets all specific like he did the math or something but then says "about" i dont get it. oh well. some people are just like that.
iwasbornin86 3 years ago
btw the vr6 start in 2nd gear!!
vr6power111 5 years ago