Dear god (or science or whatever), please send me this woman so that i may produce many brilliant, sceptical, rational children with her that i will not help support or raise in any way, shape or form.
Meaningless? I don't count the processes by which the universe exists as meaningless, we wouldn't be here without them. The fact that most scientific understanding of these processes don't invoke a god doesn't make them meaningless at all. Also, how do you get the idea that "Creation without a Creator presumes a single pattern". One more, why attribute any creation to Allah? Why not the Christian/Jewish/Hindu/Sikh/Roman/Greek, etc god(s)?
" God did it " or " The bible says so ..." are not answers to anything - it's a cop-out from the religious dogma-infested & brain dead crowd. They cannot accept " I don't know " as a legitimate response to a question that will start the process of using our God-given ( sorry about that ) rational thought & curiosity to find the truth.
@Jacobrise7 You keep babbling about Edomites in every ZOMGitsCriss video you visit. I do not think that "Edomite" means what you think it means.
Or perhaps you do, and you're simply hoping that Criss doesn't realize that you're calling her a Jew...in which case, considering that she's a confirmed atheist, what sense would THAT make?
@TheJimcat His youtube name is VenomfangX or as he's known in the rational community PCS (Posterboy for Creationist Stupidity). Thundef00t has done a good series on why creationism is incorrect and the ramblings of this moron features a lo
Creation without Creator presumes a single pattern, why should there occur two different movements on a definite pattern and quantum?
All this clearly demonstrates that the movement of the two categories of stars as it subsists at present, is the result of a definite Purpose, Design and Ingenuity, not something meaningless as these duped atheists claim.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
I just saw your response to my post. Copy paste you say ? Wrong. My words are what I post. Your response is a cloak to cover your guilt of what you've falsely accused me of. The problem is in part the attitude you carry. What attitude is that ? It's this: "We're Smart & You're Not"
Secular science is the attempt to support a humanist philosphy of life whereby no ultimate accountability meets you at the finish.
LOL the Muslim knows so little about Evolution that he does not even know who wrote the Origin of species, yet he claims to know enough to deny it. Too stupid to check his facts. If evolution is so wrong it should not hurt him to find out what it says.
@DCussen "What is faith but believing in something without evidence" Peter Singer
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan
" Only a fool would believe what he is told without any evidence" - me
"Not 1 man in 10000 has the goodness of heart or strength of mind to be an Atheist" - Samual Taylor Colridge
See we can all quote stuff. Nice to see your god laughs at the prospect of his children suffering in hell.- sounds like a sweet old man... with a mental problem
@faircompetition1 He gave his life so you wouldn't have to go to hell, but he scoffs at those who spend their lives giving him the finger, saying "we're smarter than you, we're not accountable, we'll be our own gods and resign ourselves to the limits of our own wisdom." Eternity without God is what they choose and what they will get, but God has a hand out for who surrender to him. If you want faith, it takes tremendous faith to believe in the "Origin of the Species", which is becoming a joke.
@DCussen It is "The Origin of Species" You can't even get the name of the book right yet claim to understand its contents better than men who have studied and added to its understanding for lifetimes. Face the fact that evolution is fact , Creation is myth and to say otherwise is to invite ridicule from virtually everyone with an education. Still didn’t disagree that your god laughs at the prospect of his children suffering in hell.- still sounds like a sweet old man... with a mental problem
@faircompetition1 He gave His life to pay for sin, so you wouldn't have to. He sent Christ for reconciliation with man - but He also gave you free will to turn your back to Him. But those who seek will find - 100% guaranteed. Evolution is hilarious - not a shred of evidence and many are determined, still, to believe it. Do you know a mathematician recently estimated for the complexity of a human enzyme to come together by "accident" would be 10 to the 40,000th power? LOL It's called: God
@DCussen The Fool in His heart says "There is no God" "But the one enthroned in heaven laughs. The Lord scoffs at them." Psalms 2:4
Just hold your bible up and yell, fool. Every day you are driving more and more intelligent curious kids toward scientific discovery and away from this dangerous quackery. You are doing more to advance atheism than you are capable of understanding. Keep up the good work.
There is absolutely no evidence of any animal with blood surviving without a liver. How did the liver have time to evolve in a species that required it all along and would die instantly without it? Did the liver and blood materialize or evolve in animals at the same time? Is that even possible being that they originate from different layers of the embryonic tissue? There are TONS of speculations in anatomy and other sciences that have no explanation in the theory of evolution.
@iHAVE1j In the primordial ooze of the oceans since before animals started traveling on land, the ocean's chemical makeup more closely resembled today's blood. As the chemicals changed in the ocean, animals gradually developed tissues(livers) that gradually took the burden of recycling and maintaining the components of the blood. As to different layers of embryonic layers, every cell in your body from the embryonic state was originally a stem cell containing the same genetic code.
@iHAVE1j In the primordial ooze of the oceans since before animals started traveling on land, the ocean's chemical makeup more closely resembled today's blood. As the chemicals changed in the ocean, animals gradually developed tissues(livers) that gradually took the burden of recycling and maintaining the components of the blood. As to different layers of embryonic layers, every cell in your body from the embryonic state was originally a stem cell containing the same genetic code.
@iHAVE1j (Part 2) The stem cells differentiated into different tissues as different genes became active or deactivated. All the cells in your body has the same DNA as every other cell in your body, only with different levels of activation. This means that mutations in an embryo affects the information in every cell but does not immediately affect all of those cells. If a mutation results in killing the organism or preventing it from reproducing, that mutation is not passed on.
@iHAVE1j (Part 3) Hence, across millions of generations, gradual mutations can develop in separate tissues or a new tissue develops to increase the likelihood of living and reproducing. If we still lived in an ocean with the consistency of blood, we would not have developed a system of supporting our own blood plasma. Now not all mutations are necessary for either survival or reproducing and we don't have a record of mutation in transitional species so of course there are gaps in our knowledge.
All of our genes being present in every cell is a good point, at least superficially, but you've left out too many details. If our blood were to have a different oxygen carrier, such as copper as in the crustaceans, our livers wouldn't work at all. Thus, one of the liver's essential functions--filtering blood with hemoglobin--and the evolution of our blood would have to occur simultaneously or not at all. What are the chances of this occurring randomly?
@iHAVE1j Chances? If there are infinite chances then anything can happen through chance. the biological world is filled with more than two necessary chances but the chances that matter, the ones that reproduce, are the successful ones descended from long lines of successful ones. Myself, i see no reason why god could not have had the patience and cleverness to carefully guild the occurrence of random events while using evolution as a tool. As to how much god's influence is there, who can say.
I definitely wouldn't rule out a controlled evolution, or maybe something different our perception can't entirely grasp or even conceive. I'm almost okay with being indifferent to the whole argument, but definitely hate it when people try to lump everything into the either/or or otherwise simplest "theory" they can build upon. If you omit several basic facts that contradict your own but fit into the same system, you can make anything seem true.
@iHAVE1j And THAT is the fundamental truth of it all. I'm glad you were able to come to that conclusion. There will always be uncertainty around things that happened thousands, millions & billions of years ago because simply we were not there to witness it. We can only make educated guesses at best even with science. No one really knows, no one is really right nor is anyone exactly wrong. It's human nature to be inquisitive, & I hope that is never lost. Because THAT is what makes us who we are.
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with here in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible says despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
Evolutionist are the simple minded, why?? Because they believe in bogus science. Why you might ask? Because their religion is based on No God and they do a poor job doing so in their science bibles, fairy tales for grown ups. Here is a FACT, there is a God and you are not Him, yes it is a him.
before i get hated on here, i have to emphasize, i have no feeling either way on evolutionism etc, but alot of people are unaware, that the mathematical probability that the precisely designed molecules needed for the 'simplest' bacteria could form by chance arrangement of amino acids (these are the chemicals that link up to form proteins) is far less than 1 in 10^450 Most scientists acknowledge that any possibility less than one in 10^50 is considered an impossibility
@moekanz That DNA bases will form spontaniously has been known since John Oro's experiments in 1960. To form a self-replicating system requires as few as 6 base pairs. Evolution is then inevitable, and complexity will emerge. The chances you quote (from William Dembski, the unemployable mathematitian) are irrelevant, not to mention unjustifiable.
What happened was chemistry, predictable and inevitable chemistry. Do you think something that was not chemistry?
@AntiMatterWave you know, I presented a mature argument. And this is the kinda stuff that turns people off. There's no reason to get offensive, so grow the hell up. And a theory is not backed up by evidence. If it was, it would be fact, jack ass. So before you go pissin in peoples soup, learn your terms.
"And a theory is not backed up by evidence. If it was, it would be fact, jack ass. So before you go pissin in peoples soup, learn your terms."
- no, you cant really be that stupid can you?
Evolution is a SCIENTIFIC THEORY, and in science 'theory' is the highest level of truth which a hypothesis can only graduate to AFTER it accumulates a very large body of evidence.
@ORayDizzyO I wasn't saying anything about you, just those "facts" you presented. And by the way, a theory is supported by inconclusive evidence but evidence nonetheless. This is easy stuff for anyone to know. There's a commonly accepted definition of theory which is the same as hypothesis however that definition is wrong (like how the common meaning of psychotic is insane but it really means not knowing you're insane), it's speculation supported by inconclusive evidence. Learn your own terms
@ORayDizzyO I wasn't saying anything about you, just those "facts" you presented. And by the way, a theory is supported by inconclusive evidence but evidence nonetheless. This is easy stuff for anyone to know. There's a commonly accepted definition of theory which is the same as hypothesis however that definition is wrong (like how the common meaning of psychotic is insane but it really means not knowing you're insane), it's speculation supported by inconclusive evidence. Learn your own terms
I don't have enough characters or patience to go through each point individually, and I should have known by the title this was a video designed to insult and not to educate. Since youtube doesn't like people linking to the website I have in mind and bypassing it just gives an excuse to report my post, try googling Answers In Genesis and then presenting your "argument" to them; they have far, far more patience than I do in addition to being more knowledgeable on the subject.
You guys are funny. Evolution is a fact because it's observable in a laboratory and experiments can be performed to prove it, but not because of a bunch of bigoted atheists want to attack (admittedly stupid) christians.
What a great, fun, and well-edited video! Gonna have to watch it a second time to have a few more laughs. You're a genius at video satire as well as so much more.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page
So why do dogs, birds, humans have similar eyes, hearts, ears, etc. if not related. Why could they transplant pig livers into women long enough to keep them alive until they found compatible human livers as not all human livers are compatible. Baby girl lived with a baboon heart for 21 days. How is that possible unless humans, baboons and pigs are related?
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Creationist are unable to prove that Yahweh is real. According to Hebrew mythology Yahweh Sabaoth was a warrior god from Edom/ Seir/ Paran. He used to fly around on the backs of cherubs and blow smoke out his nostrils. Yahweh is a myth. I just disprove god.
Interesting thing about Evolution being a theory, and not proven. The same can be said for all gods, that they're only theories and haven't been proven yet. And according to the ones who invented the theory, a much less plausible one at that.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, couldn't have sustained itself from all eternity. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 God isn't an explanation. God is not hinted at or pointed to. The supernatural does not exist in the universe, this is becoming increasingly obvious. 'Supernatural' is almost a meaningless word these days. Saying that something 'supernatural' exists and intelligently sculpts a universe out of magic (is unexplainable but explains everything), is incredibly presumptuous and deserves no stock in any study.
@Mogley52 If universe couldn't have always existed how did anything else always exist the same laws would apply. How could god appear out of nowhere and creat everything out of nothing?
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
@Mogley52 It WOULD be advantageous to have change in the way you walk or run if survival depends on it. ie hunting, fighting or fleeing. Evolution does not insist on individuals who alter their natural behavior, just individuals that behave naturally different. Some apes can comfortably walk upright for instance.
Also I'm afraid you'll find lots of evidence that we evolved from apes and comparing it to where apes evolved from is irrelevant. Apes were not the beginning afterall.
@Mogley52 Apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes, humans have 23. Human chromosome 2 has vestigial centromeres and telomeres, proving it to be a fusion of what was once two chromosomes. The genes located on human chromosome 2 almost perfectly match those found on two different primate chromosomes. Humans and chimpanzees (our closest primate cousin) have 98% DNA in common. Humans carry a genetic trait present in orangutans (our most distant primate cousin) that isn't present in other apes. Questions?
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their reproductive system and other vital organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
@Mogley52 When you say "genetically possible" do you mean to say you fully understand genetics? Because Geneticists on the wide scale would disagree. There are even case examples, like the lizard species introduced and separated on an island 'speciating' into two different species. They could no longer interbreed. Their genetics had recoded enough to disallow it (their appearance too). That's over relatively short time frame but had been projected by evolution and confirmed by study.
@Mogley52 It's also true that species do not evolve beyond a kind, but kinds separate into species. Imagine a tree and near the start very few species, and more and more branching out. We are on the same branch that todays apes came from. No evolution 'across' kinds occur, and evolution doesn't insist on that.
Although I'm a conservative Christian (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Stupid atheist...she's probably a liberal too. People need to get off their thrones, on both sides of the matter, and stop acting like they crap gold. Please stop acting like you know everything. If you did, you wouldn't be making videos on YouTube, you would be somewhere important.
@OmfgItsHenu Atheism isn't a belief, it's an egotistical statement that humans make so that they don't have to admit that there's someone greater than them. Also, you're saying that my judgement of political views is unChristian, but atheists commonly make the argument that religion and politics are separate ideas.
@goodygoody23 An egotistical statement is still a belief you idiot. And I often admit that there is someone greater than me. Batman, for example. Who is just as real as your god.
Again, you are so misinformed as to the discourse taking place in religious communities. What if I took a video of a foolish athiest and said "all athiests are like that". It would be stupid of me right? Well vice versa missy. Criticize the institutions, but you have no knowledge of the books....and what verses you do mention, you give such trite interpretations. I appreciate the work you do in combatting ignorance, but you must yourself learn before you speak
@moviebloggerspot wtf is wrong with you? She is a person you fuck. and she is trying to put forward an idea or point. Take her on that, not her looks. You fucking dog, Im a man, and i know, you are no man
@moviebloggerspot Seriously?!?!? No shit she is hot, but 1: SHE IS IN A DIFFERENT COUNTRY!!! and 2: You dont seem to get the fact that most men who whatch her channel, would like to talk to her and have a nice conversation with her as they would like to fuck her... In all truth I personaly would like to talk with her more. She is hot and cool, but thats not all, she is also verry smart, but you dont seem to realise that... I pitty you.
@sturfriedatheist you shouldn't pity me. Pity yourself, im a money making machine, i own hundreds of blogs making me thousands of $ a month, while you in the other hand come here waste time and try to judge a person you dont even know. I pity you instead.
Respond to this video... BTW i was only joking i know she is in another country. Yes i know she must get hundreds of PM daily, and yes i know she wouldn't chat with a stranger.
yeah, evolution is a theory (i.e. speculation supported by reason and facts) but creationism is a hypothesis (i.e. speculation supported by nothing) so which should we treat as more likely?
@AntiMatterWave Who told you creationism is a hypothesis? Did you come up with those "facts" yourself? Do you even know what theory and hypothesis means? They are basically the same thing. In order to create a hypothesis on a "test" if you will, you use all known knowledge to come up with a conclusion that you "suppose" will happen. A theory, is an educated guess. Simple as that. Neither is more "likely" than the other, it just depends on which one you believe in.
- in terms of science creationism IS an UNSUBSTANTIATED HYPOTHESIS. We know this because it is an idea that lacks any evidence capable of passing the scientific burden of proof (scientific peer review).
"Do you even know what theory and hypothesis means? They are basically the same thing" - only in colloquial use.but that's rather irrelevant because in colloquial use evolution is a fact.
@AntiMatterWave Creationism isn't even a hypothesis, because it cannot be tested with a controlled experiment. It is basically a wild guess, since it is not an observation. Humanknind never saw the world created instantly. Creationism is just an uneducated guess.
@person8110 That's true. People looked at the world and thought "how does event X occur" then made up a story that explained it. At the time they couldn't say it made no sense since they didn't know enough about how the world works (e.g. the rainbow can't be a bridge to valhalla because it's just refracted light but they didn't know that) however occasionally things would be proved wrong (e.g. no gods on mt. Olympus) then they make a better story, they made the ultimate cop-out with omnipotence.
@person8110 they can, it's just another major cop-out, they say "nothing created him, he's just always been there" which defies logical thinking completely, what was he doing for an eternity before he created the universe?
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely *rhetorical* and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists.
Your claim is nothing more than a *fanatical* illusion based on unproven theories. Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, ....
everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim,
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
Some people try to propagate this *fantasy* in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even *contradicts* empirical logic.
Wrong, a theory is a hypothesis so well supported by evidence and other science that it becomes a theory, whiel a hypothesis is a speculation that can be supported by something.
@boomguy12345 with regards to what a theory is I basically said the same thing except you said how it BECAME a theory. With regards to a hypothesis it doesn't have to be supportable to be a hypothesis, that just makes it unlikely and maybe even negligible. For example if I said that we're all plugged into The Matrix I can't support it but it's still a hypothesis, a stupid one but it's still a hypothesis
@boomguy12345 so you did but the point I was making is that speculation supported by nothing would still be classed as a hypothesis and in this case it's unsupported speculation
@Interessant11 Yes. However, be careful. Think of all the things you "cant be sure of". I am not sure there is not a unicorn in my backyard right now, I am not sure that there isn't a sea monster in the Delaware River right now. That doesnt mean I give equal credit to both sides of the argument. You should always base any knowledge you claim to have on evidence. There is no credible evidence to suggest any god is real, but there's a lot of evidence to suggest why no deity is necessary.
@Interessant11 however, until I see good evidence that bigfoot exists, I do not believe that such a being does. So many people have such a gross misunderstanding of what atheism is. Now, dont get me wrong, some atheists so claim that there is 100% no god. That is stupid. No one can claim 100% anything. But until someone shows me good evidence and reason, I am an agnostic atheist.
@Interessant11 you have the classic mis-understanding of atheism. Atheism is not claiming there is 100% no chance of any sort of god existing. Atheism is just having no positive belief in a god. thats it. If I see evidence which suggests the existence of a deity, I will gladly accept that one exists. However, until then, I am atheist. All that agnostic means is "without knowledge". I admitI don't know for sure. I'm still atheist. Its the same w bigfoot. I can't say 100% bigfoot is not real...
Creationism: because besides the flawed logic, made-up facts, lack of reasoning, lack of understanding, lack of proof, lack of common fucking sense, and lack of the slightest bit of credibility, it's a rock solid theory.
@Interessant11 atheist and agnostic are not mutually exclusive. I am atheist and also agnostic. Atheist just means you lack a belief in any god or gods.
5 easy steps guide to being a respected creationist so pay attention...or go to HELL!!! Ha that's so funny. So pay attention Christian Zombies or you'll go you know where and meet He-who-must-not-be-named (Voldemort, I mean Lucy fur).
"no two snowflakes are alike" i've often heard this about snowflakes and fingerprints, and i've always wondered how they went about testing something like that...
It is just induction. We have not yet seen it through thousands of observations, so we assume they are never alike. Even twins do not have identical fingerprints (albeit very similar). This does not mean that two may not come along that are exactly the same. :)
@toothcentral Ehh... well being a gay guy I kind of overlooked her breasts. But I always thought it was a symbol for eternal life. A persons soul maybe
@Spocktacular96 it's just a symbol of eternity... to those that need a meaning behind everything.... to others it's a shiny thing right above her sweet perky sexy breasts :-)
Omg ... what a dumb ass... assuming god created world... snow flakes follow the pattern provided by god... and equation with some randoms bla bla bla... we call it physics. So assuming that nature is the designer of snowflakes , god is the designer of nature... what a shitty explanation even for a hypothetical debate.
None of these make sense...
Theories have been disproved in the past... We know to little to say something is 100% true. In fact I believe if the Hadron Collider shows no results.
@CELLERTOTEN All of these three components must be present at the same time... that means that if something happened just once... it wouldn't be true...
You need to be harsh, because if you don't shake them, they'll not listen. But in your own inner world I hope you are more understanding. People just want to live, work from day to day, raise their children and die. They largely don't have the energy to either to be jihadists, or scientific knowers. They are not morons. They're just folks. Where they feel a need for explanation, the "GOD" standby is a very useful shorthand. No braincells need be wasted, and human inner equilibrium results.
My biggest problem with creationists is that they can't tell the difference between searching for an answer and ignoring answers. You have so many religions spouting possible answers and we say "Let's look into it. Hey we just found evidence, turns out none of you were right" then we do that about some more things and when we don't claim to have a definite answer for something that's when they attack. Not assuming something is not the same as assuming it to be wrong
Wow, you are smart and funny. And that might be your problem. You like to listen to yourself too much. But of course I don't have any facts based opinion. Anyway, keep thinking and maybe you will convince yourself that there is no God and no "design", because that is of course so obviously stupid, especially when the only thing somebody looks at is your video.
@gytaxor Are you familiar with the term "ad hominem"? It's when stupid people find that they can't counter an argument with facts or evidence, so choose to attack the person instead. Look it up, moron.
If this creationist garbage is worthy of any discussion or consideration than so is Stork Theory as an alternate view point for biological reproduction. Fucking jesus tards.
ID. What nonsense. Fact is not an opinion or a faith based bias. With this type of fraudulent claim only ridicule, disdain and contempt is due. Ignorance and self disillusionment is no excuse. They should be ashamed for spewing this tripe and poisoning children's impressionable minds. It is simply child abuse that our culture regards as acceptable.
look people r just becomin more critical and less believin. so we start of wit religions dat believe in many gods. then we only believe in religions wit 1 god. then we refuse this god so we believe in atheism. we then begin 2 c many flaws and paradoxes in science so we believe in nihilism. from nihilism we then make gods again in order 2 stop our depression. everything just goes full circle. wer realy just learnin nuffin.
Dear god (or science or whatever), please send me this woman so that i may produce many brilliant, sceptical, rational children with her that i will not help support or raise in any way, shape or form.
smithcas86 2 days ago in playlist How to be a good Creationist
god (if there is one) IS the universe...we're just crabs on gods nutsack
IChIDH 5 days ago
Marry mee!! XD
Osmarche 2 weeks ago
Meaningless? I don't count the processes by which the universe exists as meaningless, we wouldn't be here without them. The fact that most scientific understanding of these processes don't invoke a god doesn't make them meaningless at all. Also, how do you get the idea that "Creation without a Creator presumes a single pattern". One more, why attribute any creation to Allah? Why not the Christian/Jewish/Hindu/Sikh/Roman/Greek, etc god(s)?
Thecactusman 3 weeks ago
Please do turn this into a series. This is good!
88rat88 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" God did it " or " The bible says so ..." are not answers to anything - it's a cop-out from the religious dogma-infested & brain dead crowd. They cannot accept " I don't know " as a legitimate response to a question that will start the process of using our God-given ( sorry about that ) rational thought & curiosity to find the truth.
curiousgeorge1940 1 month ago
When Pope John Paul II was ill, did they all get together and pray or did they ALSO send for a doctor?
How little faith they have in their own god!!
MrSelidor7 1 month ago 4
criss, where are you from?
MrDoobious 1 month ago
You're not American, why have an issue with American creationists? They're twisted. Anyway, good production, good argument.
bobinhk1 1 month ago
Dumbfuck Jokerboy calling science "jibberish" on the ULTRAWEB is a contradiction fucking itself in the ass with his own colon.
TheCrimsonification 1 month ago
God did a Great Job in making you Edomites the Devil and Satan!
Jacobrise7 1 month ago
@Jacobrise7 You keep babbling about Edomites in every ZOMGitsCriss video you visit. I do not think that "Edomite" means what you think it means.
Or perhaps you do, and you're simply hoping that Criss doesn't realize that you're calling her a Jew...in which case, considering that she's a confirmed atheist, what sense would THAT make?
BloodyBay 1 week ago
@BloodyBay I don't know who the Edomites are, but they make damned good cheese.
acr08807 6 days ago
I want to marry this brilliant individual.
dciple12 1 month ago
Awesome video.
pophutch72 2 months ago
Religion people works with the edge of sicense. Where there's a limit for knowledge God entrance by the front door.
lltrevisan 2 months ago
guys...whats the name of the guy at 2:55 ?
TheJimcat 2 months ago
@TheJimcat His youtube name is VenomfangX or as he's known in the rational community PCS (Posterboy for Creationist Stupidity). Thundef00t has done a good series on why creationism is incorrect and the ramblings of this moron features a lo
Thecactusman 2 months ago
@Thecactusman k ty
TheJimcat 2 months ago
@Thecactusman The atheist Delusion!
Creation without Creator presumes a single pattern, why should there occur two different movements on a definite pattern and quantum?
All this clearly demonstrates that the movement of the two categories of stars as it subsists at present, is the result of a definite Purpose, Design and Ingenuity, not something meaningless as these duped atheists claim.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
1tabligh 3 weeks ago
Masturbating while learning has just become a new talent of mine.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
DDDoppleganger1 3 months ago
@DDDoppleganger1 lol
johnny2086 3 months ago
@nephroncavity finally it took you long enough!
bravone1 3 months ago
Hahaha.
MynameisElliott 3 months ago
I just saw your response to my post. Copy paste you say ? Wrong. My words are what I post. Your response is a cloak to cover your guilt of what you've falsely accused me of. The problem is in part the attitude you carry. What attitude is that ? It's this: "We're Smart & You're Not"
Secular science is the attempt to support a humanist philosphy of life whereby no ultimate accountability meets you at the finish.
-psygnsup-
psygnsup 3 months ago
ble ble ge glbe ble ge te fucking hell her voice annoys me
zubairkhans11 3 months ago
Its romanian, dude.
VictoriaRosification 3 months ago
Greek. Her accent has got to be greek.
UndeadProductionsCo 3 months ago
dearest venomfagx: next time you get kicked in the balls you go ahead and tell me how well the human body is designed.
trollface.jpg
viking977 3 months ago
LOL the Muslim knows so little about Evolution that he does not even know who wrote the Origin of species, yet he claims to know enough to deny it. Too stupid to check his facts. If evolution is so wrong it should not hurt him to find out what it says.
faircompetition1 3 months ago
The Fool in His heart says "There is no God" "But the one enthroned in heaven laughs. The Lord scoffs at them." Psalms 2:4
DCussen 3 months ago
@DCussen "What is faith but believing in something without evidence" Peter Singer
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan
" Only a fool would believe what he is told without any evidence" - me
"Not 1 man in 10000 has the goodness of heart or strength of mind to be an Atheist" - Samual Taylor Colridge
See we can all quote stuff. Nice to see your god laughs at the prospect of his children suffering in hell.- sounds like a sweet old man... with a mental problem
faircompetition1 3 months ago
@faircompetition1 He gave his life so you wouldn't have to go to hell, but he scoffs at those who spend their lives giving him the finger, saying "we're smarter than you, we're not accountable, we'll be our own gods and resign ourselves to the limits of our own wisdom." Eternity without God is what they choose and what they will get, but God has a hand out for who surrender to him. If you want faith, it takes tremendous faith to believe in the "Origin of the Species", which is becoming a joke.
DCussen 3 months ago
@DCussen It is "The Origin of Species" You can't even get the name of the book right yet claim to understand its contents better than men who have studied and added to its understanding for lifetimes. Face the fact that evolution is fact , Creation is myth and to say otherwise is to invite ridicule from virtually everyone with an education. Still didn’t disagree that your god laughs at the prospect of his children suffering in hell.- still sounds like a sweet old man... with a mental problem
faircompetition1 3 months ago
@faircompetition1 He gave His life to pay for sin, so you wouldn't have to. He sent Christ for reconciliation with man - but He also gave you free will to turn your back to Him. But those who seek will find - 100% guaranteed. Evolution is hilarious - not a shred of evidence and many are determined, still, to believe it. Do you know a mathematician recently estimated for the complexity of a human enzyme to come together by "accident" would be 10 to the 40,000th power? LOL It's called: God
DCussen 3 months ago
@DCussen he sounds like a very pompous and juvenile God.
MrNicMachiavelli 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DCussen The Fool in His heart says "There is no God" "But the one enthroned in heaven laughs. The Lord scoffs at them." Psalms 2:4
Just hold your bible up and yell, fool. Every day you are driving more and more intelligent curious kids toward scientific discovery and away from this dangerous quackery. You are doing more to advance atheism than you are capable of understanding. Keep up the good work.
Edwinward 2 months ago
Gosh, this is so good.
Stairc 3 months ago
You. Are. AWESOME!! Absolutely love this video :)
bodie81473 3 months ago
There is absolutely no evidence of any animal with blood surviving without a liver. How did the liver have time to evolve in a species that required it all along and would die instantly without it? Did the liver and blood materialize or evolve in animals at the same time? Is that even possible being that they originate from different layers of the embryonic tissue? There are TONS of speculations in anatomy and other sciences that have no explanation in the theory of evolution.
iHAVE1j 3 months ago
@iHAVE1j In the primordial ooze of the oceans since before animals started traveling on land, the ocean's chemical makeup more closely resembled today's blood. As the chemicals changed in the ocean, animals gradually developed tissues(livers) that gradually took the burden of recycling and maintaining the components of the blood. As to different layers of embryonic layers, every cell in your body from the embryonic state was originally a stem cell containing the same genetic code.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iHAVE1j In the primordial ooze of the oceans since before animals started traveling on land, the ocean's chemical makeup more closely resembled today's blood. As the chemicals changed in the ocean, animals gradually developed tissues(livers) that gradually took the burden of recycling and maintaining the components of the blood. As to different layers of embryonic layers, every cell in your body from the embryonic state was originally a stem cell containing the same genetic code.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
@iHAVE1j (Part 2) The stem cells differentiated into different tissues as different genes became active or deactivated. All the cells in your body has the same DNA as every other cell in your body, only with different levels of activation. This means that mutations in an embryo affects the information in every cell but does not immediately affect all of those cells. If a mutation results in killing the organism or preventing it from reproducing, that mutation is not passed on.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
@iHAVE1j (Part 3) Hence, across millions of generations, gradual mutations can develop in separate tissues or a new tissue develops to increase the likelihood of living and reproducing. If we still lived in an ocean with the consistency of blood, we would not have developed a system of supporting our own blood plasma. Now not all mutations are necessary for either survival or reproducing and we don't have a record of mutation in transitional species so of course there are gaps in our knowledge.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
@LancePoint9
All of our genes being present in every cell is a good point, at least superficially, but you've left out too many details. If our blood were to have a different oxygen carrier, such as copper as in the crustaceans, our livers wouldn't work at all. Thus, one of the liver's essential functions--filtering blood with hemoglobin--and the evolution of our blood would have to occur simultaneously or not at all. What are the chances of this occurring randomly?
iHAVE1j 3 months ago
@iHAVE1j Chances? If there are infinite chances then anything can happen through chance. the biological world is filled with more than two necessary chances but the chances that matter, the ones that reproduce, are the successful ones descended from long lines of successful ones. Myself, i see no reason why god could not have had the patience and cleverness to carefully guild the occurrence of random events while using evolution as a tool. As to how much god's influence is there, who can say.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
@LancePoint9
I definitely wouldn't rule out a controlled evolution, or maybe something different our perception can't entirely grasp or even conceive. I'm almost okay with being indifferent to the whole argument, but definitely hate it when people try to lump everything into the either/or or otherwise simplest "theory" they can build upon. If you omit several basic facts that contradict your own but fit into the same system, you can make anything seem true.
iHAVE1j 3 months ago 2
@iHAVE1j It does seem too much like people have to find an absolute answer for every unknown. Good to just enjoy the mystery.
LancePoint9 3 months ago
@iHAVE1j And THAT is the fundamental truth of it all. I'm glad you were able to come to that conclusion. There will always be uncertainty around things that happened thousands, millions & billions of years ago because simply we were not there to witness it. We can only make educated guesses at best even with science. No one really knows, no one is really right nor is anyone exactly wrong. It's human nature to be inquisitive, & I hope that is never lost. Because THAT is what makes us who we are.
sirGiedion 3 months ago
Brains and beauty. Keep up the good work Criss
protossenslaver 3 months ago
Smart girl...good work, just keep it !
EvilMrDark 4 months ago
Wow! she is so HOT
ACCSESS247 4 months ago in playlist How to be a good Creationist
Are you ready?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with here in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible says despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
standingontruth1 4 months ago
It is difficult to follow this video while also masturbating.
opinion01001 4 months ago in playlist How to be a good Creationist
European girls are on average more attractive and much more intelligent than americans.
VitalSigns1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolutionist are the simple minded, why?? Because they believe in bogus science. Why you might ask? Because their religion is based on No God and they do a poor job doing so in their science bibles, fairy tales for grown ups. Here is a FACT, there is a God and you are not Him, yes it is a him.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
Comment removed
PTKPiper 4 months ago
before i get hated on here, i have to emphasize, i have no feeling either way on evolutionism etc, but alot of people are unaware, that the mathematical probability that the precisely designed molecules needed for the 'simplest' bacteria could form by chance arrangement of amino acids (these are the chemicals that link up to form proteins) is far less than 1 in 10^450 Most scientists acknowledge that any possibility less than one in 10^50 is considered an impossibility
moekanz 4 months ago
Comment removed
holyfrost2 4 months ago
@moekanz That DNA bases will form spontaniously has been known since John Oro's experiments in 1960. To form a self-replicating system requires as few as 6 base pairs. Evolution is then inevitable, and complexity will emerge. The chances you quote (from William Dembski, the unemployable mathematitian) are irrelevant, not to mention unjustifiable.
What happened was chemistry, predictable and inevitable chemistry. Do you think something that was not chemistry?
gamesbok 2 months ago
@lebeaubastion Not sure I fully understand what you mean. I don't remember mentioning the dictionary definition of 'scientific theory'
ORayDizzyO 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave you know, I presented a mature argument. And this is the kinda stuff that turns people off. There's no reason to get offensive, so grow the hell up. And a theory is not backed up by evidence. If it was, it would be fact, jack ass. So before you go pissin in peoples soup, learn your terms.
ORayDizzyO 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ORayDizzyO
"And a theory is not backed up by evidence. If it was, it would be fact, jack ass. So before you go pissin in peoples soup, learn your terms."
- no, you cant really be that stupid can you?
Evolution is a SCIENTIFIC THEORY, and in science 'theory' is the highest level of truth which a hypothesis can only graduate to AFTER it accumulates a very large body of evidence.
types10000 4 months ago
@ORayDizzyO I wasn't saying anything about you, just those "facts" you presented. And by the way, a theory is supported by inconclusive evidence but evidence nonetheless. This is easy stuff for anyone to know. There's a commonly accepted definition of theory which is the same as hypothesis however that definition is wrong (like how the common meaning of psychotic is insane but it really means not knowing you're insane), it's speculation supported by inconclusive evidence. Learn your own terms
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ORayDizzyO I wasn't saying anything about you, just those "facts" you presented. And by the way, a theory is supported by inconclusive evidence but evidence nonetheless. This is easy stuff for anyone to know. There's a commonly accepted definition of theory which is the same as hypothesis however that definition is wrong (like how the common meaning of psychotic is insane but it really means not knowing you're insane), it's speculation supported by inconclusive evidence. Learn your own terms
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
I don't have enough characters or patience to go through each point individually, and I should have known by the title this was a video designed to insult and not to educate. Since youtube doesn't like people linking to the website I have in mind and bypassing it just gives an excuse to report my post, try googling Answers In Genesis and then presenting your "argument" to them; they have far, far more patience than I do in addition to being more knowledgeable on the subject.
KamisamanoOtaku 4 months ago
You guys are funny. Evolution is a fact because it's observable in a laboratory and experiments can be performed to prove it, but not because of a bunch of bigoted atheists want to attack (admittedly stupid) christians.
shitthrowingmonkey1 4 months ago
Your intelegence,rational thought process,basic knowledge and important message is somehow overwhelmed by your apperance. Super HOT !!!
BarryE1958 4 months ago
You're right. Lightning and thunder aren't caused by gods. It is angels bowling. :p
Reip187 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ZOMGitsCriss
I Love what you do! Whaooo! Brillent!
SpoonyG925 4 months ago
I'm just wondering why you're wearing the "Ankh" around your neck, since it's a symbol for eternal life offered to man by the gods. ;)
TheLycaeum 4 months ago
What a great, fun, and well-edited video! Gonna have to watch it a second time to have a few more laughs. You're a genius at video satire as well as so much more.
awreslr2 4 months ago
All evolutionists have to check this out /watch?v=XF9j7OAyAnE&feature=related my favourite ones are #33 and #20, 21, 22
AntiMatterWave 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page
Heartfullofsoul100 5 months ago
So why do dogs, birds, humans have similar eyes, hearts, ears, etc. if not related. Why could they transplant pig livers into women long enough to keep them alive until they found compatible human livers as not all human livers are compatible. Baby girl lived with a baboon heart for 21 days. How is that possible unless humans, baboons and pigs are related?
hydrolito 5 months ago
You cant use science to prove your god exists if you ignore the science that proves he doesn't. - Me :)
Love your videos :)
KerraSeayWhat 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
I am a creationist because I want to create babies with you.
Gravija1980 5 months ago 2
@Gravija1980 clever. very, very clever ;))
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Creationist are unable to prove that Yahweh is real. According to Hebrew mythology Yahweh Sabaoth was a warrior god from Edom/ Seir/ Paran. He used to fly around on the backs of cherubs and blow smoke out his nostrils. Yahweh is a myth. I just disprove god.
halolIlmao0 5 months ago
Interesting thing about Evolution being a theory, and not proven. The same can be said for all gods, that they're only theories and haven't been proven yet. And according to the ones who invented the theory, a much less plausible one at that.
TheAndiePerson 5 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, couldn't have sustained itself from all eternity. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 God isn't an explanation. God is not hinted at or pointed to. The supernatural does not exist in the universe, this is becoming increasingly obvious. 'Supernatural' is almost a meaningless word these days. Saying that something 'supernatural' exists and intelligently sculpts a universe out of magic (is unexplainable but explains everything), is incredibly presumptuous and deserves no stock in any study.
And stop copy/paste please.
TheBreadfan 5 months ago
@Mogley52 If universe couldn't have always existed how did anything else always exist the same laws would apply. How could god appear out of nowhere and creat everything out of nothing?
hydrolito 5 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 It WOULD be advantageous to have change in the way you walk or run if survival depends on it. ie hunting, fighting or fleeing. Evolution does not insist on individuals who alter their natural behavior, just individuals that behave naturally different. Some apes can comfortably walk upright for instance.
Also I'm afraid you'll find lots of evidence that we evolved from apes and comparing it to where apes evolved from is irrelevant. Apes were not the beginning afterall.
TheBreadfan 5 months ago
@Mogley52 Apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes, humans have 23. Human chromosome 2 has vestigial centromeres and telomeres, proving it to be a fusion of what was once two chromosomes. The genes located on human chromosome 2 almost perfectly match those found on two different primate chromosomes. Humans and chimpanzees (our closest primate cousin) have 98% DNA in common. Humans carry a genetic trait present in orangutans (our most distant primate cousin) that isn't present in other apes. Questions?
nolordsnomasters 5 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their reproductive system and other vital organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 When you say "genetically possible" do you mean to say you fully understand genetics? Because Geneticists on the wide scale would disagree. There are even case examples, like the lizard species introduced and separated on an island 'speciating' into two different species. They could no longer interbreed. Their genetics had recoded enough to disallow it (their appearance too). That's over relatively short time frame but had been projected by evolution and confirmed by study.
TheBreadfan 5 months ago
@Mogley52 It's also true that species do not evolve beyond a kind, but kinds separate into species. Imagine a tree and near the start very few species, and more and more branching out. We are on the same branch that todays apes came from. No evolution 'across' kinds occur, and evolution doesn't insist on that.
TheBreadfan 5 months ago
Although I'm a conservative Christian (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
Can you just make an insanely long video, these 5 minute blurps aren't enough of you.
bouncer257 5 months ago
am i the only one who wants to bang her?
yuriroxo 5 months ago
@yuriroxo No.
strongholdcommercial 5 months ago
I don't know about creationist's but ur super cute ~(:
karakondjo2 5 months ago 13
Her hair is fucking amazing. I wish my hair was like that. :(
KikyoChanXD 5 months ago
Stupid atheist...she's probably a liberal too. People need to get off their thrones, on both sides of the matter, and stop acting like they crap gold. Please stop acting like you know everything. If you did, you wouldn't be making videos on YouTube, you would be somewhere important.
goodygoody23 5 months ago
@goodygoody23 "Stupid atheist...she's probably a liberal too."
so now you are being disrespectful to a persons religious beliefs, and also, being disrespectful of her political views.
how very christian of you.
"If you did, you wouldn't be making videos on YouTube, you would be somewhere important."
oh the irony, she has millions of views on her videos, and people who listen to her opinions, and what do you do?
you are on a 1 man crusade on youtube. and ignore that every1 laughs at you.
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu Atheism isn't a belief, it's an egotistical statement that humans make so that they don't have to admit that there's someone greater than them. Also, you're saying that my judgement of political views is unChristian, but atheists commonly make the argument that religion and politics are separate ideas.
goodygoody23 5 months ago
@goodygoody23 " that they don't have to admit that there's someone greater than them. "
yeah, and not the thing that bronze age myths dont make so much sense anymore in the 21st century.
"you're saying that my judgement of political views is unChristian"
do unto others as u wish to done to urself, or something. idk
"but atheists commonly make the argument that religion and politics are separate ideas."
shouldnt they be?? it always has destructive effects if theyre not.
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu Your points have no relevance or direction to them so I'm just not even going to reply.
goodygoody23 5 months ago
@goodygoody23 yeah, answering your statements isnt relevant.
im not going to reply either xD
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
@goodygoody23 An egotistical statement is still a belief you idiot. And I often admit that there is someone greater than me. Batman, for example. Who is just as real as your god.
biggingeryeti 5 months ago
It's always good to know that there are still people who reason:)
tensoerge 6 months ago
You are so beautiful and your accent is so beautifully exotic to me :)
dcent2 6 months ago
EXTRA props for the dexters lab reference :)
smita10 6 months ago
Again, you are so misinformed as to the discourse taking place in religious communities. What if I took a video of a foolish athiest and said "all athiests are like that". It would be stupid of me right? Well vice versa missy. Criticize the institutions, but you have no knowledge of the books....and what verses you do mention, you give such trite interpretations. I appreciate the work you do in combatting ignorance, but you must yourself learn before you speak
lajungesombre 6 months ago
@lajungesombre oh one thing....i think we SHOULD criticize many of these religious institutions for propagating ignorance.
lajungesombre 6 months ago
maybe you should get back in the kitchen and CREATE me a bacon sandwich, bitch.
SJGibbons1000 6 months ago in playlist How to be a good Creationist
@SJGibbons1000 fuck off
lajungesombre 6 months ago
hey babe PM me i would like to know you. LOL. You look so hot.
moviebloggerspot 6 months ago
@moviebloggerspot wtf is wrong with you? She is a person you fuck. and she is trying to put forward an idea or point. Take her on that, not her looks. You fucking dog, Im a man, and i know, you are no man
lajungesombre 6 months ago
@moviebloggerspot Seriously?!?!? No shit she is hot, but 1: SHE IS IN A DIFFERENT COUNTRY!!! and 2: You dont seem to get the fact that most men who whatch her channel, would like to talk to her and have a nice conversation with her as they would like to fuck her... In all truth I personaly would like to talk with her more. She is hot and cool, but thats not all, she is also verry smart, but you dont seem to realise that... I pitty you.
sturfriedatheist 6 months ago
@sturfriedatheist you shouldn't pity me. Pity yourself, im a money making machine, i own hundreds of blogs making me thousands of $ a month, while you in the other hand come here waste time and try to judge a person you dont even know. I pity you instead.
moviebloggerspot 6 months ago
Respond to this video... BTW i was only joking i know she is in another country. Yes i know she must get hundreds of PM daily, and yes i know she wouldn't chat with a stranger.
moviebloggerspot 6 months ago
hey babe how do i get to know you. you are so freaking beautiful.
moviebloggerspot 6 months ago
yeah, evolution is a theory (i.e. speculation supported by reason and facts) but creationism is a hypothesis (i.e. speculation supported by nothing) so which should we treat as more likely?
AntiMatterWave 6 months ago 34
@AntiMatterWave: Creationism, of course. If there's nothing to support it, what could possibly go wrong? ;-)
jardabc 5 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Who told you creationism is a hypothesis? Did you come up with those "facts" yourself? Do you even know what theory and hypothesis means? They are basically the same thing. In order to create a hypothesis on a "test" if you will, you use all known knowledge to come up with a conclusion that you "suppose" will happen. A theory, is an educated guess. Simple as that. Neither is more "likely" than the other, it just depends on which one you believe in.
ORayDizzyO 4 months ago
@ORayDizzyO that's absolute bullshit. A theory is backed up by evidence, a hypothesis is speculation, they are completely different
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@ORayDizzyO Whoa there. Dictionary + Scientific Theory = Not same as Theory in every day language. Knowledge is your friend!
lebeaubastion 4 months ago
@ORayDizzyO
"Who told you creationism is a hypothesis?"
- in terms of science creationism IS an UNSUBSTANTIATED HYPOTHESIS. We know this because it is an idea that lacks any evidence capable of passing the scientific burden of proof (scientific peer review).
"Do you even know what theory and hypothesis means? They are basically the same thing" - only in colloquial use.but that's rather irrelevant because in colloquial use evolution is a fact.
types10000 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Creationism isn't even a hypothesis, because it cannot be tested with a controlled experiment. It is basically a wild guess, since it is not an observation. Humanknind never saw the world created instantly. Creationism is just an uneducated guess.
person8110 4 months ago
@person8110 That's true. People looked at the world and thought "how does event X occur" then made up a story that explained it. At the time they couldn't say it made no sense since they didn't know enough about how the world works (e.g. the rainbow can't be a bridge to valhalla because it's just refracted light but they didn't know that) however occasionally things would be proved wrong (e.g. no gods on mt. Olympus) then they make a better story, they made the ultimate cop-out with omnipotence.
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave However, there is a limit to what they can do. They cannot answer this question: If your deity is real, who or what created it?
person8110 4 months ago
@person8110 they can, it's just another major cop-out, they say "nothing created him, he's just always been there" which defies logical thinking completely, what was he doing for an eternity before he created the universe?
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave Exactly. Science works, religion doesn't.
person8110 4 months ago
@person8110 The atheist Delusion!
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely *rhetorical* and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists.
Your claim is nothing more than a *fanatical* illusion based on unproven theories. Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, ....
1tabligh 4 months ago
everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim,
1tabligh 4 months ago
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
Some people try to propagate this *fantasy* in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even *contradicts* empirical logic.
1tabligh 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave you mean hypothesis(i.e. speculation supported by an idea) right? or no? I just need opinion...
KoukiBuri 4 months ago
@KoukiBuri something doesn't need to be supported by an idea to be a hypothesis or at least not to my knowledge
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave
Wrong, a theory is a hypothesis so well supported by evidence and other science that it becomes a theory, whiel a hypothesis is a speculation that can be supported by something.
boomguy12345 4 months ago
@boomguy12345 with regards to what a theory is I basically said the same thing except you said how it BECAME a theory. With regards to a hypothesis it doesn't have to be supportable to be a hypothesis, that just makes it unlikely and maybe even negligible. For example if I said that we're all plugged into The Matrix I can't support it but it's still a hypothesis, a stupid one but it's still a hypothesis
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave
I said that a hypothesis CAN be supported by something.
boomguy12345 4 months ago
@boomguy12345 so you did but the point I was making is that speculation supported by nothing would still be classed as a hypothesis and in this case it's unsupported speculation
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@Interessant11 Yes. However, be careful. Think of all the things you "cant be sure of". I am not sure there is not a unicorn in my backyard right now, I am not sure that there isn't a sea monster in the Delaware River right now. That doesnt mean I give equal credit to both sides of the argument. You should always base any knowledge you claim to have on evidence. There is no credible evidence to suggest any god is real, but there's a lot of evidence to suggest why no deity is necessary.
JBeezie428 6 months ago
@Interessant11 however, until I see good evidence that bigfoot exists, I do not believe that such a being does. So many people have such a gross misunderstanding of what atheism is. Now, dont get me wrong, some atheists so claim that there is 100% no god. That is stupid. No one can claim 100% anything. But until someone shows me good evidence and reason, I am an agnostic atheist.
JBeezie428 6 months ago
@Interessant11 you have the classic mis-understanding of atheism. Atheism is not claiming there is 100% no chance of any sort of god existing. Atheism is just having no positive belief in a god. thats it. If I see evidence which suggests the existence of a deity, I will gladly accept that one exists. However, until then, I am atheist. All that agnostic means is "without knowledge". I admitI don't know for sure. I'm still atheist. Its the same w bigfoot. I can't say 100% bigfoot is not real...
JBeezie428 6 months ago
Who is the lady at 3:10? I'd like to see her video for a laugh.
IseeRightThrough2you 6 months ago
Creationism: because besides the flawed logic, made-up facts, lack of reasoning, lack of understanding, lack of proof, lack of common fucking sense, and lack of the slightest bit of credibility, it's a rock solid theory.
Nixom1334 6 months ago
@Interessant11 atheist and agnostic are not mutually exclusive. I am atheist and also agnostic. Atheist just means you lack a belief in any god or gods.
JBeezie428 6 months ago
marry me
JBeezie428 6 months ago
"...Tell that to Galileo Galilei and others who were persecuted for being smarter than god."
LOLgasm.
Criss, you are the best atheist ever. If I was a girl, I would marry you.
RiotBoiToy 6 months ago
5 easy steps guide to being a respected creationist so pay attention...or go to HELL!!! Ha that's so funny. So pay attention Christian Zombies or you'll go you know where and meet He-who-must-not-be-named (Voldemort, I mean Lucy fur).
bjbt0586 6 months ago
Fuck you snowflakes are awesome!
just kidding. good video =)
tigerw222 6 months ago
Hot & Smart
Juillardl 6 months ago
"no two snowflakes are alike" i've often heard this about snowflakes and fingerprints, and i've always wondered how they went about testing something like that...
GeatMaster 6 months ago
@GeatMaster
It is just induction. We have not yet seen it through thousands of observations, so we assume they are never alike. Even twins do not have identical fingerprints (albeit very similar). This does not mean that two may not come along that are exactly the same. :)
finalfantasiest1234 6 months ago
@toothcentral Ehh... well being a gay guy I kind of overlooked her breasts. But I always thought it was a symbol for eternal life. A persons soul maybe
Spocktacular96 6 months ago
I like the ankh necklace she wears. Even though it is the Egyptian symbol of eternal life
Spocktacular96 6 months ago
@Spocktacular96 it's just a symbol of eternity... to those that need a meaning behind everything.... to others it's a shiny thing right above her sweet perky sexy breasts :-)
ToothCentral 6 months ago
You should really do something about that rotten crotch of yours.
treasuredroperX 6 months ago
Which then means that End of the World isn't true YAY!
CELLERTOTEN 6 months ago
...and the observer would go to the freak house xD
CELLERTOTEN 6 months ago
Omg ... what a dumb ass... assuming god created world... snow flakes follow the pattern provided by god... and equation with some randoms bla bla bla... we call it physics. So assuming that nature is the designer of snowflakes , god is the designer of nature... what a shitty explanation even for a hypothetical debate.
None of these make sense...
Theories have been disproved in the past... We know to little to say something is 100% true. In fact I believe if the Hadron Collider shows no results.
CELLERTOTEN 6 months ago
@CELLERTOTEN we might want to start to rethink our view of the world.
Wy are we assuming that Religious people are irrational? I am well aware that I might be wrong in my beliefs...
Its funny because scientists are only humans... and won't allow certain things to become a law.
We call those things Phenomena. These are the things that were observed ,but not repeatable.
Which in following the scientific Logic... something that isn't observable , testable and repeatable ... isn't
true.
CELLERTOTEN 6 months ago
@CELLERTOTEN All of these three components must be present at the same time... that means that if something happened just once... it wouldn't be true...
CELLERTOTEN 6 months ago
Category: Education
Touchè
Wadupbeyotch1 6 months ago
You need to be harsh, because if you don't shake them, they'll not listen. But in your own inner world I hope you are more understanding. People just want to live, work from day to day, raise their children and die. They largely don't have the energy to either to be jihadists, or scientific knowers. They are not morons. They're just folks. Where they feel a need for explanation, the "GOD" standby is a very useful shorthand. No braincells need be wasted, and human inner equilibrium results.
thre3eplus 6 months ago
My biggest problem with creationists is that they can't tell the difference between searching for an answer and ignoring answers. You have so many religions spouting possible answers and we say "Let's look into it. Hey we just found evidence, turns out none of you were right" then we do that about some more things and when we don't claim to have a definite answer for something that's when they attack. Not assuming something is not the same as assuming it to be wrong
BlackAssassinBlade 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
Only ONE step to being a "good Creationist," and it's called a LOBOTOMY!!!
donfishmaster 6 months ago
Hate to break it to you but a "good" creationist is as much of an oxymoron as black Klan member.
wr4id619 6 months ago
Wow, you are smart and funny. And that might be your problem. You like to listen to yourself too much. But of course I don't have any facts based opinion. Anyway, keep thinking and maybe you will convince yourself that there is no God and no "design", because that is of course so obviously stupid, especially when the only thing somebody looks at is your video.
gytaxor 6 months ago
@gytaxor Are you familiar with the term "ad hominem"? It's when stupid people find that they can't counter an argument with facts or evidence, so choose to attack the person instead. Look it up, moron.
Ellie8969 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If this creationist garbage is worthy of any discussion or consideration than so is Stork Theory as an alternate view point for biological reproduction. Fucking jesus tards.
scotttebben 7 months ago
ID. What nonsense. Fact is not an opinion or a faith based bias. With this type of fraudulent claim only ridicule, disdain and contempt is due. Ignorance and self disillusionment is no excuse. They should be ashamed for spewing this tripe and poisoning children's impressionable minds. It is simply child abuse that our culture regards as acceptable.
scotttebben 7 months ago
I think i've fallen in love. :D
directorc1 7 months ago
aly michalka?
katten838 7 months ago
look people r just becomin more critical and less believin. so we start of wit religions dat believe in many gods. then we only believe in religions wit 1 god. then we refuse this god so we believe in atheism. we then begin 2 c many flaws and paradoxes in science so we believe in nihilism. from nihilism we then make gods again in order 2 stop our depression. everything just goes full circle. wer realy just learnin nuffin.
rakimkoolgrapwutang 7 months ago
I love the finger-thing you did in the beggining...hihi 0:09
weworld2 7 months ago