You know, I said when HDTV became popular that I could never imagine them ever topping it.
I wonder though, in 8 years time, is 3D tv and UHDTV going to be 2 completely seperate things? ie you can only have one or the other? Forgive me if that sounds a bit naive.
@tomharding no im sure they;; have UHDTV's that are 3D or even 4D. i was thinking they would take it in a more portable innovative direction rather then making it stunning quality. i mean it already is great quality, the human eye can only recognize so much of a difference. Thought they would focus more on like virtual tv. like you put glasses on and it makes you feel like you there.
@tomharding no im sure they;; have UHDTV's that are 3D or even 4D. i was thinking they would take it in a more portable innovative direction rather then making it stunning quality. i mean it already is great quality, the human eye can only recognize so much of a difference. Thought they would focus more on like virtual tv. like you put glasses on and it makes you feel like you there.
@ariesas you can't notice anything special about the tv from this video, the only way you could would be to actually see it in person. The tv simply is at an incredible quality, but this video wasnt recorded on an hd camera so the camera cant pick up all the details that hd or uhd can show, so in result, the tv doesnt look any better than a tv from the 90's from what we can see here
If this is possible, why did we move to 720p or 1080p? Why not just go straight to the highest resolution we possibly can achieve? Could it be it's THAT expensive?
You are a very bright fellow, my friend. Perhaps you should be the next CEO of Samsung? Let me tell you one thing, there are only two Super Hi-Vision cameras in the world. Now, what does that mean. It means that if you broke it, you would probably sued and you would spend your entire life being a bankrupt hobo.
Does that makes things clear as to how damn expensive this technology is. This camera is worth more than your life. Oh and how about you take a survey as to how many people have a standard TV vs a HDTV, because we still have a long way to go for everyone to go even 720 yet.
Why are you offending me on not just one, but TWO posts? It was just a question on how expensive such a technology was to not apply it immediately. I did not offend anyone, as you did to me twice.
@ricarleite third, after filming in Superhivision and capturing the couple dozen audio channels, is transmission/broadcasting. The data stream for SuperHivision is so disgustingly huge, the internet just isn't built for it. There's no way to get it to every home even using fiber.. unless you want to commission your own personal micro satellite, one for audio and one for video AND pay for the connection to a company that stores the TV shows or movies you want to watch.
@LZIM Ya but here is the thing... remember back, oh I don't know 15 years ago: Hard drive had less than one gigabyte of space, and they were huge. Now we have 1 and 2 terabyte hard drives available.
But now technology is advancing exponentially, within around 10 years (and this is just a guess) millions of households worldwide will be receiving UHDTV/ Super Hi-Vision channels using just a small satellite dish.
That is if there is no end of the world terror on 2012?
@TheDoctorK1 and it is easy to be naive about that exponential advancement of technology, as it is what we've seen since the advent of consumer HD for broadcasting and bluray, GPUs for gaming, and server capacity (trickling processor power and memory speed and capacity to consumers), IMO isn't going to go quite as far since (as you mentioned) people don't even care about 720p 1080p and game minsysreqs don't care about dx11 and multicore chips. How many people care about bluray or TB drives?
for movies, gaming and television, 3DHD is about the only thing in the next decade that will get people to upgrade again. While PS3 and 360 stay as top dogs in consoles (barely capable of 1080p HD or 3D and arguably 3DHD), and while they don't get upgraded in the next 4-5 years, and while fiber internet connections remains limited (due to providers being greedy), I doubt we'll need UHDTV for a while outside of cinemas or anything else that will really push the need for storage capacity.
@eaststeed indeed, but Holographic on a 2D screen (with nano technology for crushing even more pixels into a square inch), or an actual volume like a fish tank full of pixels (needing some kind of field technology to hold tiny pixels steady in the volume). Something like 2 cubic meter volume and 160 gigapixels... maybe waiting for holographic 2D is better.
@TheDoctorK1 never mind surround sound. last I heard SuperHiVision is coupled to 22+ channels of audio. I can't imagine most consumers having that many speakers or having them correctly calibrated.
@ricarleite cost. and you misunderstand that the move is from analog TV and cameras to digital displays AND cameras that capture those pictures, it could have been to any resolution. 720 and 1080 happened to be cost effective in terms of making digital displays using available technology. generally monitors had higher resolution even before HD came along for broadcast television. so yes, asking got a display that can do 7680x4320 for consumers IS expensive, for broadcasters and filmmakers too.
UHDTV and Super hi vision are the same thing, just different ways of saying it. UHD standing for Ultra-High Definition. And don't get too excited about it anytime soon, from what I have read it isn't expected to go commercial until 2025.
1droga esó!
marciel128 4 months ago
360p UHDTV is AWESOME!
MasheneHouse 5 months ago in playlist New Display Tech 21
UHDTV and 3D without glasses together is the future, and not so distant. :)
charlisd5 7 months ago
You can already see the difference, even in this recorded SD.
gtarules1 8 months ago
gotta see it in person to tell difference.
krackherback 8 months ago
incredible resolution, when will it come
IQ20000Berta 10 months ago
@IQ20000Berta 2016 - 2020 mainly based on technical reasons concerning storage and broadcast distribution of content
Virus71193 8 months ago
You know, I said when HDTV became popular that I could never imagine them ever topping it.
I wonder though, in 8 years time, is 3D tv and UHDTV going to be 2 completely seperate things? ie you can only have one or the other? Forgive me if that sounds a bit naive.
tomharding 1 year ago
@tomharding no im sure they;; have UHDTV's that are 3D or even 4D. i was thinking they would take it in a more portable innovative direction rather then making it stunning quality. i mean it already is great quality, the human eye can only recognize so much of a difference. Thought they would focus more on like virtual tv. like you put glasses on and it makes you feel like you there.
pcigroot 10 months ago
@tomharding no im sure they;; have UHDTV's that are 3D or even 4D. i was thinking they would take it in a more portable innovative direction rather then making it stunning quality. i mean it already is great quality, the human eye can only recognize so much of a difference. Thought they would focus more on like virtual tv. like you put glasses on and it makes you feel like you there.
pcigroot 10 months ago
it is experimental. but if that is the future. damn i need bigger house for taht :DD
Voikanaa 1 year ago
I dont notice anything special
ariesas 1 year ago
@ariesas it has 7680 × 4320 pixels it is mpre than the cinema 4K
haker9521 1 year ago
@ariesas thats cuz the resolution of the youtube video can't support super- hi resolution!
eaststeed 1 year ago
@ariesas you can't notice anything special about the tv from this video, the only way you could would be to actually see it in person. The tv simply is at an incredible quality, but this video wasnt recorded on an hd camera so the camera cant pick up all the details that hd or uhd can show, so in result, the tv doesnt look any better than a tv from the 90's from what we can see here
bbvproductions 1 year ago
SCREAMER WARNING
BeakyRed 1 year ago
If this is possible, why did we move to 720p or 1080p? Why not just go straight to the highest resolution we possibly can achieve? Could it be it's THAT expensive?
ricarleite 1 year ago
@ricarleite
You are a very bright fellow, my friend. Perhaps you should be the next CEO of Samsung? Let me tell you one thing, there are only two Super Hi-Vision cameras in the world. Now, what does that mean. It means that if you broke it, you would probably sued and you would spend your entire life being a bankrupt hobo.
TheDoctorK1 1 year ago
@ricarleite
Does that makes things clear as to how damn expensive this technology is. This camera is worth more than your life. Oh and how about you take a survey as to how many people have a standard TV vs a HDTV, because we still have a long way to go for everyone to go even 720 yet.
TheDoctorK1 1 year ago
@TheDoctorK1
Why are you offending me on not just one, but TWO posts? It was just a question on how expensive such a technology was to not apply it immediately. I did not offend anyone, as you did to me twice.
ricarleite 1 year ago
Comment removed
LZIM 1 year ago
@ricarleite third, after filming in Superhivision and capturing the couple dozen audio channels, is transmission/broadcasting. The data stream for SuperHivision is so disgustingly huge, the internet just isn't built for it. There's no way to get it to every home even using fiber.. unless you want to commission your own personal micro satellite, one for audio and one for video AND pay for the connection to a company that stores the TV shows or movies you want to watch.
LZIM 1 year ago
Comment removed
LZIM 1 year ago
@LZIM Ya but here is the thing... remember back, oh I don't know 15 years ago: Hard drive had less than one gigabyte of space, and they were huge. Now we have 1 and 2 terabyte hard drives available.
But now technology is advancing exponentially, within around 10 years (and this is just a guess) millions of households worldwide will be receiving UHDTV/ Super Hi-Vision channels using just a small satellite dish.
That is if there is no end of the world terror on 2012?
TheDoctorK1 1 year ago
@TheDoctorK1 and it is easy to be naive about that exponential advancement of technology, as it is what we've seen since the advent of consumer HD for broadcasting and bluray, GPUs for gaming, and server capacity (trickling processor power and memory speed and capacity to consumers), IMO isn't going to go quite as far since (as you mentioned) people don't even care about 720p 1080p and game minsysreqs don't care about dx11 and multicore chips. How many people care about bluray or TB drives?
LZIM 1 year ago
for movies, gaming and television, 3DHD is about the only thing in the next decade that will get people to upgrade again. While PS3 and 360 stay as top dogs in consoles (barely capable of 1080p HD or 3D and arguably 3DHD), and while they don't get upgraded in the next 4-5 years, and while fiber internet connections remains limited (due to providers being greedy), I doubt we'll need UHDTV for a while outside of cinemas or anything else that will really push the need for storage capacity.
LZIM 1 year ago
@LZIM Well a lot of people still see 3D as a gimmick I'm really waiting out for a holo-screen
eaststeed 1 year ago
@eaststeed indeed, but Holographic on a 2D screen (with nano technology for crushing even more pixels into a square inch), or an actual volume like a fish tank full of pixels (needing some kind of field technology to hold tiny pixels steady in the volume). Something like 2 cubic meter volume and 160 gigapixels... maybe waiting for holographic 2D is better.
LZIM 1 year ago
@TheDoctorK1 never mind surround sound. last I heard SuperHiVision is coupled to 22+ channels of audio. I can't imagine most consumers having that many speakers or having them correctly calibrated.
LZIM 1 year ago
Comment removed
LZIM 1 year ago
@ricarleite cost. and you misunderstand that the move is from analog TV and cameras to digital displays AND cameras that capture those pictures, it could have been to any resolution. 720 and 1080 happened to be cost effective in terms of making digital displays using available technology. generally monitors had higher resolution even before HD came along for broadcast television. so yes, asking got a display that can do 7680x4320 for consumers IS expensive, for broadcasters and filmmakers too.
LZIM 1 year ago
UHDTV and Super hi vision are the same thing, just different ways of saying it. UHD standing for Ultra-High Definition. And don't get too excited about it anytime soon, from what I have read it isn't expected to go commercial until 2025.
ozmium 2 years ago
Now, where can I find at least a 1080P version of the NHK video instead of this lame 480?
Bosingr 2 years ago
No,there is: Ultra High Definition Television look it up.
bolojr 2 years ago 3
Can't wait until uhdtv is commercially available!!!
F1circuit 2 years ago
Its super hi vision. No such thing as uhdtv.
Conflickr 2 years ago