If you guys clock it on the downhill side you could probably add 60 mph to it. Also, when you use 2 radar guns they might jam each other with 2 return signals it might be more reliable using 1 radar only.
Agreed! We've always just used the up leg becasue it is safer and more convenient. All we really need is a relative comparison anyway. Mark Drela posted a nice plot of ground speed throughout the circuit on RCGroups that shows the downleg speed to be a little over 10% more than the upleg speed where we currently measure.
I have wondered about interference between the guns before...
Very nice. Especially with all the phony video posts on here. Whatever you do, don't accidently fly that thing into yourself!!!! I think it'll leave a mark.
Amazing. I used to do that in the early 1990's but with the material back then we never reached those speeds...the planes would just have been shredded to pieces.
It would be interesting to measure the g-forces the plane has to endure. I suspect them to be well in the two figures, say like 20 or 30 g.
no reading no reading next time hire some tech ppl to film and use the radar gun he wasnt even pointing it at the plane no reading duhh man these guys make stoners look good!
Beautiful! Loved watching. I have built and flown "floaters" like the Oly 650 & Oly II. Had one lose control at the slope one day, a fella was relieving himself just below the edge of the slope just inches from where my 650 buried itself about 6 inches into the soil. I shudder to think what a 300 MPH plus impact might do! Egads!
I'm no expert, but it should be possible given the upwards airflow. The wind lifts the model up, every loop, and every loop it comes back down as far as it was lifted up, gaining speed each time if there's excess energy from the lift used to overcome all the friction. That's why they try to minimize control surface changes, no sharp turns or changes, those take up speed. It's the terminal velocity (sloped), minus losses for looping. You can see the max if you drop it from a plane.
@DavidSunshine867 He uses the wind to gain speed when he comes towards the ridge. Every time he does this, he gains almost the speed of the wind because he is moving the same way, already having the kinetic energy (under the form of speed) collected from the previous loop. When he gets against the wind, he losses a small amount of what he gains, because he gets helped by gravity and the profile of the wing. But there is a limit imposed by air friction of the max gained speed.
Thanks for the input, it's great to have everyone discuss this, as it's an interesting topic.
But I would disagree with your explanation of how he gains speed.
You mentioned he gains speed while moving the same direction as the wind, I disagree with this part because the plane is moving faster than the wind, so he'll lose speed due to friction. If wind is 50mph, he is going 300mph, he'll have friction of 250mph. He also gains height, losing more speed.
When uses his own speed to gain height, he loses speed as well, say he loses X mph going up 100m, but the upwards wind has contributed to 10m of height gain in that same time, he will come downwards 110m the next fall, if he only loses the equivalent of 5m height in mph, he will have gained a 5m drop in speed, accelerating at < 9.81m/s^2, if he does this over and over again, it adds up, as long as he doesn't lose too much speed through human error. Too sharp of a turn, etc.
@DavidSunshine867 The combined gravity pull and kinetic energy collected, isn't enough to gain speed in going downwards against the wind, thats just because the airspeed on the plane would be already its speed+wind airspeed = high drag force, but its enough to save a part of the energy collected the energy collected. Going with the wind, the airspeed is much smaller, cause its minus the wind speed by 2 (comparative to going against it).
@DavidSunshine867 The pitch under wich it attacks the wind at the base of the loop, gives the benefit of using the gravity force half way , without loosing height, but even gaining a bit, because the winds direction is vertical. This only applies when passing the airspeed possible by the airplane in a vertical drop (in a free enviroment, not affected by wind or other forces). Until it reaches that limit its helped by the full loop.
DS gliding is awesome, I don't understand the full physics of it, but I agree with you that the plane can do this until terminal velocity(gravity and air drag), minus the efficiency losses of the turns.
And you're probably right, that the gravity and kinetic energy gained only isn't enough, there's energy gained out of the wind, but what exactly is the mechanism of this? You mentioned the pitch of attack to the wind, this must be the key to gaining speed?
@DavidSunshine867 close to the surface of the hill, with a strong wind there can be an upward movement in the air of... say 4000 feet per minute. (rough guess) a little higher, when he flies back down the slope, the air is rising at a lower rate... say 1000 feet per minute. It's kind of like putting the plane into a very rapid descent from an unlimited altitude.
@DavidSunshine867 close to the surface of the hill, with a strong wind there can be an upward movement in the air of... say 4000 feet per minute. (rough guess) a little higher, when he flies back down the slope, the air is rising at a lower rate... say 1000 feet per minute. It's kind of like putting the plane into a very rapid descent from an unlimited altitude.
We have calculated the G's to range from 50G under regular flight up to 75G when a large control input is made with the transmitter. The plane in this video weighs 200oz (12.5 lb)...
Precisely why we built a massive stone wall to hide behind. This video shows some atypical unsafe behavior. We have since tightened up on the safety aspect to where everyone on site is advised to take cover behind the wall or radar rock whenever there is a plane in the groove. You are right, eventually something will fail on every plane, best to plan for it...
There is already supersonic airflow over the wing due to the acceleration over the top. The top speed of 445mph by John Buxton with his 100" Kinetic DP was around Mach=0.65. REALLY FAST!!!
How do you guys get a "reliable" Radar reading from something so small which is made from composite? I assume you pull the trigger as it comes back up the hillside?..sooo..thats like maybe 1 second only?..Just curious, Im a modeller like you guys...UK...I would be a bit dubious myself given the wildly fluctuating readings.
The gun is on the correct scale but this record speed is old news There are now more than 6 different people in the world who have flown R/C Sailplanes over 357mph. The new record is 428mph set by the Kinetic again at Weldon on May 10, 2010. No video of that one but there is video on Vimeo of a previous flight at 412mph...
This is accomplished by using the rotor found on the downwind or "back" side of a slope. It is not thermaling or sloping in the traditional way. You guys are way overthinking this. Google dynamic soaring and youll see how it works. Normally when you sloap soar you try to avoid this area. Also when flying real aircraft these regions are avoided at all cost.
@ClaytonBezui that really does nt make sence becasuse the rate of something falling is not 357 miles an hour ,,,, so it must be trusting down as well as up ,,, i believe the rate of fall for gravitaional fall is 12 feet per second ,,, but you might wish to look that up
You are talking about terminal velocity, each item has different terminal velocity depending on its drag coefficient. a sleek airplane would reach a higher terminal velocity falling than say a parachute jumper (even before he opens his shute). , does anyone know what the wind speed was on the slope?
the rate of acceleration of gravity (g) is about 9.8meters/second^2 (g)minus the force of the drag(initialy it is zero but increases until F = g when you reach terminal velocity)
@ClaytonBezui you are correct this doesnt seem quite right does it ? it appears that this is correct but i seem to be a little scepticle yes yes terinal velocitiy is 9.8 maters which equals 12 feet per second all things concidered but i would like to take a good look at the measuring devices we cronoed a paint ball gun on a wrong setting [ feet per sec ] and it sure works out different that miles per hours , or even kilometers per hour , i suppose this is possible it just seems crazy
@ClaytonBezui how do you get a drag coeffeciencie that actually goes this far ? you re talking about meters per second ,,,, this is miles an hour ,,,, multiply the meters in a mile then multiply that by 537 miles a hour ,,, then divide that by the number of seconds in a hour ,,, no this plane actually gains trust from its lift and drive coupled with the tail wind
Ya, I agree with you, the top speed is pretty much the terminal velocity, minus any friction caused by the control surface inputs, but if he doesn't turn and goes straight he can almost reach terminal velocity.
Like unlimited free fall. The thinner the air the faster he could go, so do this at higher altitude and you get even higher speeds!
Ever seen a flying squirrel? Ever throw a paper plane? You get the idea...
The trick is finding air that is rising faster than the plane is sinking. Once you get the hang of that, then you combine basic sustained flight with manipulating airmasses moving at different speeds and then you can experience dynamic soaring...
well all they use is gravity and lift to fly just have to get em in the air with either another plane pulling it and letting it go or some kind of really powerful pully system or wench system. At lest thats my idea on it. I do know some use small planes to tow them in to the air
As a full size sailplane pilot, i had been wondering when some one would DS in a full size. Looking at the coments here, we would be stuffed by the 'g' very quickly and also would rapidly get well past our max manoevering speed (not much more than 100kts on most sailplanes). But hell, it would be FUN! Well done you guys, really great stuff.
but hey people have missed something, is noone gonna comment on this or has noone noticed it yet that when they film the speed meter at 1.33 into the video it clearly states 375 when he yells "325" what's that all about?
The number in the bottom right corner is 375 but that is the max speed range of the gun not the recorded speed... Of course this is obsolete now, see the video link above for the 392mph video...
Hmm, I didn't know that you guys flew downwind. It was only today that I found you guys fly perpendicular to the wind, and then fly back down into a no air zone, only to repeat it :)
Umm, you wouldn't be able to recommend a model to me, would you?
Another way to understand DS is that the plane loses less energy between laps than it gains from the conversion of the angular acceleration (from increased lift) to a semi-linear acceleration. A plane will no longer accelerate each lap when the energy lost from drag-because of pilot error or otherwise-equals the energy gained from flying back into the wind and converting the increased airspeed into lift, lift into angular acceleration and so on.
Could you put this is tems i could understand...or maybe a link? I want to understand how the glider goes so fast. Makes no sense to, but it is happening. I am just getting into gliders now, and would just like to understand it...wouldn't try that trick for years. Cheers
... O.O I have seen one of these before, it was done by a balsa plane. after about 50mph the wings just shattered, there was nothing left of them. Now im wondering what the g-forces are on that poor thing. that is truly amazing.
What's the science behind this wind action? The wind blows one direction on the side of the hill or multiple directions? What is the trick to getting the plane to that speed? Where are the forces pushing that plane?
It is called Dynamic Soaring. The plane extracts energy by moving between airmasses with different velocities. In the video, the wind is coming from the right. We are flying on the back side of a ridge. The air behind the ridge is basically still. Every time the plane moves from the still air into the 50mph headwind, it gains 50mph of airspeed. Repeat with each circuit while trying to minimize losses and eventually the plane really gets moving fast!
That's an interesting thought, although I think that because the sailplane would be going at the wave propagation speed (speed of sound) the wind would not be able to impart anymore energy into it, hmm.
Near mach, but I think it would be powered flight to achieve Mach 1. Also, the plane might explode (quite literally), which is generally the result of an airframe being pushed too much...
lol, I was flying gliders with my sisters boyfriend and her friend today and they told me about this video and I didn't believe them but SHIT they were RIGHT!!! 357 MPH!!! that's almost like impossible!!! I thought it was a mean sound it made when ours went past us but now I no it can almost sound like a jet!!! AWESOME VIDEO!!!
Outstanding work. Even for the videographer. And radar man.
For the disbelievers, this sailplane is "powered" by the sun. Really. Sun causes wind, wind hits mountains and is curved up. The vertical component of this wind provides the energy to lift the plane, counteracting gravity. Flying orbits, it COULD climb until the wind no longer curves up from the mountains. Instead, the pilot keeps it in an orbit, varying the altitude to maintain the energy. Speed or altitude.
Actually, altitude plays almost no role in building the speeds here. This is not a simple trade off from kinetic energy to potential energy (speed or altitude). Dynamic soaring relies only the velocity difference between the air on the front of the slope (40-50mph wind) and the air on the back of the slope(+/- 0mph).
Google Search 'Dynamic Soaring' to learn more about the concept. Bottom line is manipulating the difference of 50mph wind on front of the ridge and relatively still air on the backside of the ridge.
Amazing. I just recently discovered these types of gliders and I never in a million years would have guessed this could be done with a glider. Incredible.
How ON EARTH CAN YOU CONTROL THAT THING? IT HAS DISAPPEARED BEFORE YOU HAVE EVEN SPOTTED IT!!! EVEN I FEEL STRAINED SOMETIMES WITH MY 110 MPH ARC JUPITER!!!!!!! HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU FLY THAT AT THOSE SPEEDS!!??!?!?!?!
WITCHCRAFT!!
allamericandude15 1 week ago
WTF??!! That is insane!
ThisIs84 2 weeks ago
HOLY CRAP THAT IS WAY TOO MUCH FORCE FOR A SMALL RC PLANE.
hottfuzz2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PeiperJ2 The sailplane here is moving many times faster than the air that it gets its energy from. How is that possible?
awnser; cintrifical force......from the big circles he is flying in
anthony3leaves 5 months ago
unreal
hoelli19911004 5 months ago
Moving like a jet. & not a drop of fuel burned.
niflap 8 months ago
If you guys clock it on the downhill side you could probably add 60 mph to it. Also, when you use 2 radar guns they might jam each other with 2 return signals it might be more reliable using 1 radar only.
dustycoyote1 8 months ago
@dustycoyote1
Agreed! We've always just used the up leg becasue it is safer and more convenient. All we really need is a relative comparison anyway. Mark Drela posted a nice plot of ground speed throughout the circuit on RCGroups that shows the downleg speed to be a little over 10% more than the upleg speed where we currently measure.
I have wondered about interference between the guns before...
sll914 8 months ago
Very nice. Especially with all the phony video posts on here. Whatever you do, don't accidently fly that thing into yourself!!!! I think it'll leave a mark.
Stuckinthemuck1 9 months ago
what's the model?
DanFrederiksen 9 months ago
this is unpowered? pretty amazing
DanFrederiksen 9 months ago
The idea of dynamic soaring came from watching large seabirds duck behind waves.
martinusher1 9 months ago
can the wings get ripped off if this spinning goes on for dozens of times at well over 100 miles per hour?
hayabusarider168 10 months ago
is this official in the giunis book of world records?
galaxything 11 months ago
Amazing. I used to do that in the early 1990's but with the material back then we never reached those speeds...the planes would just have been shredded to pieces.
It would be interesting to measure the g-forces the plane has to endure. I suspect them to be well in the two figures, say like 20 or 30 g.
JCrashB 1 year ago
How landing
MarcChep 1 year ago
@MarcChep Drop flaps and it'll land slowly
sll914 1 year ago
Very cool, how long can you keep it up?
stefanmckinley 1 year ago
@PeiperJ2 : Just like a sailboat tacks at an angle to the wind to get it's greatest speed.
Blasikov 1 year ago
no reading no reading next time hire some tech ppl to film and use the radar gun he wasnt even pointing it at the plane no reading duhh man these guys make stoners look good!
alexdevries420 1 year ago
@alexdevries420 Maybe they could get you to show them how it's done.
CBum425 1 year ago
strong wings
pol6455 1 year ago
Beautiful! Loved watching. I have built and flown "floaters" like the Oly 650 & Oly II. Had one lose control at the slope one day, a fella was relieving himself just below the edge of the slope just inches from where my 650 buried itself about 6 inches into the soil. I shudder to think what a 300 MPH plus impact might do! Egads!
DougsterCanada1 1 year ago
so Now.... how do you land it?
convict9110 1 year ago
@convict9110
burn off all the speed, then drop the flaps to hover down to the top of the ridge like a helicopter as long as the wind is a steady 25-30mph or so...
sll914 1 year ago
@PeiperJ2
I'm no expert, but it should be possible given the upwards airflow. The wind lifts the model up, every loop, and every loop it comes back down as far as it was lifted up, gaining speed each time if there's excess energy from the lift used to overcome all the friction. That's why they try to minimize control surface changes, no sharp turns or changes, those take up speed. It's the terminal velocity (sloped), minus losses for looping. You can see the max if you drop it from a plane.
DavidSunshine867 1 year ago
@DavidSunshine867 He uses the wind to gain speed when he comes towards the ridge. Every time he does this, he gains almost the speed of the wind because he is moving the same way, already having the kinetic energy (under the form of speed) collected from the previous loop. When he gets against the wind, he losses a small amount of what he gains, because he gets helped by gravity and the profile of the wing. But there is a limit imposed by air friction of the max gained speed.
protheus123 1 year ago
Comment removed
CritterCallReviews 1 year ago
Comment removed
CritterCallReviews 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@protheus123
Thanks for the input, it's great to have everyone discuss this, as it's an interesting topic.
But I would disagree with your explanation of how he gains speed.
You mentioned he gains speed while moving the same direction as the wind, I disagree with this part because the plane is moving faster than the wind, so he'll lose speed due to friction. If wind is 50mph, he is going 300mph, he'll have friction of 250mph. He also gains height, losing more speed.
DavidSunshine867 1 year ago
@protheus123
When uses his own speed to gain height, he loses speed as well, say he loses X mph going up 100m, but the upwards wind has contributed to 10m of height gain in that same time, he will come downwards 110m the next fall, if he only loses the equivalent of 5m height in mph, he will have gained a 5m drop in speed, accelerating at < 9.81m/s^2, if he does this over and over again, it adds up, as long as he doesn't lose too much speed through human error. Too sharp of a turn, etc.
DavidSunshine867 1 year ago
@DavidSunshine867 The combined gravity pull and kinetic energy collected, isn't enough to gain speed in going downwards against the wind, thats just because the airspeed on the plane would be already its speed+wind airspeed = high drag force, but its enough to save a part of the energy collected the energy collected. Going with the wind, the airspeed is much smaller, cause its minus the wind speed by 2 (comparative to going against it).
protheus123 1 year ago
@DavidSunshine867 The pitch under wich it attacks the wind at the base of the loop, gives the benefit of using the gravity force half way , without loosing height, but even gaining a bit, because the winds direction is vertical. This only applies when passing the airspeed possible by the airplane in a vertical drop (in a free enviroment, not affected by wind or other forces). Until it reaches that limit its helped by the full loop.
protheus123 1 year ago
@protheus123
DS gliding is awesome, I don't understand the full physics of it, but I agree with you that the plane can do this until terminal velocity(gravity and air drag), minus the efficiency losses of the turns.
And you're probably right, that the gravity and kinetic energy gained only isn't enough, there's energy gained out of the wind, but what exactly is the mechanism of this? You mentioned the pitch of attack to the wind, this must be the key to gaining speed?
DavidSunshine867 1 year ago
@DavidSunshine867 close to the surface of the hill, with a strong wind there can be an upward movement in the air of... say 4000 feet per minute. (rough guess) a little higher, when he flies back down the slope, the air is rising at a lower rate... say 1000 feet per minute. It's kind of like putting the plane into a very rapid descent from an unlimited altitude.
jwboll 1 year ago
@DavidSunshine867 close to the surface of the hill, with a strong wind there can be an upward movement in the air of... say 4000 feet per minute. (rough guess) a little higher, when he flies back down the slope, the air is rising at a lower rate... say 1000 feet per minute. It's kind of like putting the plane into a very rapid descent from an unlimited altitude.
jwboll 1 year ago
how many Gs are that?
aseglkj 1 year ago
@aseglkj
We have calculated the G's to range from 50G under regular flight up to 75G when a large control input is made with the transmitter. The plane in this video weighs 200oz (12.5 lb)...
sll914 1 year ago
how much does that plane weigh?
rctestflight 1 year ago
@rctestflight
About 12-13 lbs
sll914 1 year ago
woooooooooooooww
parkourbr16 1 year ago
wow, gliders realyer do go well!
MyFatty69 1 year ago
crazy stuff, anyone scared something might fail and the plane goes out of control?
mechmove 1 year ago
@mechmove
Precisely why we built a massive stone wall to hide behind. This video shows some atypical unsafe behavior. We have since tightened up on the safety aspect to where everyone on site is advised to take cover behind the wall or radar rock whenever there is a plane in the groove. You are right, eventually something will fail on every plane, best to plan for it...
sll914 1 year ago
when are you going super sonic? :P
cy2kill 1 year ago
@cy2kill
There is already supersonic airflow over the wing due to the acceleration over the top. The top speed of 445mph by John Buxton with his 100" Kinetic DP was around Mach=0.65. REALLY FAST!!!
sll914 1 year ago
How do you guys get a "reliable" Radar reading from something so small which is made from composite? I assume you pull the trigger as it comes back up the hillside?..sooo..thats like maybe 1 second only?..Just curious, Im a modeller like you guys...UK...I would be a bit dubious myself given the wildly fluctuating readings.
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
Now, put the gun on the correct scale.
ardvarkkkkk 1 year ago
@ardvarkkkkk
The gun is on the correct scale but this record speed is old news There are now more than 6 different people in the world who have flown R/C Sailplanes over 357mph. The new record is 428mph set by the Kinetic again at Weldon on May 10, 2010. No video of that one but there is video on Vimeo of a previous flight at 412mph...
sll914 1 year ago
This is accomplished by using the rotor found on the downwind or "back" side of a slope. It is not thermaling or sloping in the traditional way. You guys are way overthinking this. Google dynamic soaring and youll see how it works. Normally when you sloap soar you try to avoid this area. Also when flying real aircraft these regions are avoided at all cost.
MrStr8shootr 1 year ago
at 1:33 the gun reads 375? but he says 325 wtf???
mitchamus 1 year ago
Excellent !!
dukenukem08 1 year ago
@PeiperJ2 The answer is simple, they use the thermals to gain altitude then use gravity to gain speed
ClaytonBezui 1 year ago
@ClaytonBezui that really does nt make sence becasuse the rate of something falling is not 357 miles an hour ,,,, so it must be trusting down as well as up ,,, i believe the rate of fall for gravitaional fall is 12 feet per second ,,, but you might wish to look that up
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1
You are talking about terminal velocity, each item has different terminal velocity depending on its drag coefficient. a sleek airplane would reach a higher terminal velocity falling than say a parachute jumper (even before he opens his shute). , does anyone know what the wind speed was on the slope?
the rate of acceleration of gravity (g) is about 9.8meters/second^2 (g)minus the force of the drag(initialy it is zero but increases until F = g when you reach terminal velocity)
ClaytonBezui 1 year ago
@ClaytonBezui you are correct this doesnt seem quite right does it ? it appears that this is correct but i seem to be a little scepticle yes yes terinal velocitiy is 9.8 maters which equals 12 feet per second all things concidered but i would like to take a good look at the measuring devices we cronoed a paint ball gun on a wrong setting [ feet per sec ] and it sure works out different that miles per hours , or even kilometers per hour , i suppose this is possible it just seems crazy
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@ClaytonBezui how do you get a drag coeffeciencie that actually goes this far ? you re talking about meters per second ,,,, this is miles an hour ,,,, multiply the meters in a mile then multiply that by 537 miles a hour ,,, then divide that by the number of seconds in a hour ,,, no this plane actually gains trust from its lift and drive coupled with the tail wind
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@ClaytonBezui
Ya, I agree with you, the top speed is pretty much the terminal velocity, minus any friction caused by the control surface inputs, but if he doesn't turn and goes straight he can almost reach terminal velocity.
Like unlimited free fall. The thinner the air the faster he could go, so do this at higher altitude and you get even higher speeds!
DavidSunshine867 1 year ago
lol i couldn't do it id end up losing sight of it and smacking a friend with the damn thing xD
heathfiedler 2 years ago
@heathfiedler and decapitating them.
madnesscombat5 2 years ago
hah yeah that would suck
heathfiedler 2 years ago
how do sailplanes work?
traxxaslover123 2 years ago
Ever seen a flying squirrel? Ever throw a paper plane? You get the idea...
The trick is finding air that is rising faster than the plane is sinking. Once you get the hang of that, then you combine basic sustained flight with manipulating airmasses moving at different speeds and then you can experience dynamic soaring...
sll914 2 years ago
well all they use is gravity and lift to fly just have to get em in the air with either another plane pulling it and letting it go or some kind of really powerful pully system or wench system. At lest thats my idea on it. I do know some use small planes to tow them in to the air
heathfiedler 2 years ago
As a full size sailplane pilot, i had been wondering when some one would DS in a full size. Looking at the coments here, we would be stuffed by the 'g' very quickly and also would rapidly get well past our max manoevering speed (not much more than 100kts on most sailplanes). But hell, it would be FUN! Well done you guys, really great stuff.
gliderboy438 2 years ago 5
How can a plane that's weights 100 tons be lifted by just air?? Its called thermodynamics.
skogsstjarnan 2 years ago
but hey people have missed something, is noone gonna comment on this or has noone noticed it yet that when they film the speed meter at 1.33 into the video it clearly states 375 when he yells "325" what's that all about?
johanspiiike 2 years ago
Canuckhelinut also pointed this out earlier. The number in the bottom right corner is the max speed range of the gun, not the peak recorded speed...
sll914 2 years ago
Also, this is old news, The latest record is 399mph set at the same location by the 100" Kinetic. You can find the video on Vimeo...
sll914 2 years ago
how can a glider like this be so fast?
scmbyhbk 2 years ago
Pretty fast for a glider you lost your calling as an aerospce engineer! Burt and Dick Rutan got nuthin on you!!
Flyboyjimi 2 years ago
I think I let the experts answer on that ..
As I dont know for myself..
But if you google, there is many pages that explain how its possible..
liteglow2000 2 years ago
Try to sit in a chair that is spinning around with you feet out !
When you are spinning, try to take your feet IN :) then you understand..
liteglow2000 2 years ago
how can i make one
sz42781 2 years ago
buy one ;)
mcmarga 2 years ago
I love that thunder-like sound of turbulence created by the airfoil at those speeds (mm) So sick!
YeahYeahYeahs8 2 years ago
More info on the Kinetic Sailplanes can be found at:
vv vv vv DSKineticDOTcom
sll914 2 years ago
Even though I build things that are strong and last forever... Nothing I have would withstand those speeds... Heck, I don't even think that fast. :)
pmgodfrey 2 years ago
Yeah baby... brake the sound barrier get into guiness book. Awsome.
newyorkflyerRC 2 years ago
Hey guys...might want to check the speed gun reading at the 1:31 mark of the video...
To me that reads 375 not 325...
If so..WOW!!!!
That is sooo SICK!!!
Well done!
Canuckhelinut 2 years ago
The number in the bottom right corner is 375 but that is the max speed range of the gun not the recorded speed... Of course this is obsolete now, see the video link above for the 392mph video...
sll914 2 years ago
Was this an Acacia or a Sting?
walkandlookup 2 years ago
20 G`s!!!!!^^
dodogolf1993 2 years ago
It must of been stuck in a realy big wind
getgad777 2 years ago
wtf
shinobi992 2 years ago
Click above to see the new video of current 392mph record...
sll914 2 years ago
Hmm, I didn't know that you guys flew downwind. It was only today that I found you guys fly perpendicular to the wind, and then fly back down into a no air zone, only to repeat it :)
Umm, you wouldn't be able to recommend a model to me, would you?
greatplanesman 2 years ago
Another way to understand DS is that the plane loses less energy between laps than it gains from the conversion of the angular acceleration (from increased lift) to a semi-linear acceleration. A plane will no longer accelerate each lap when the energy lost from drag-because of pilot error or otherwise-equals the energy gained from flying back into the wind and converting the increased airspeed into lift, lift into angular acceleration and so on.
mterle 2 years ago
Could you put this is tems i could understand...or maybe a link? I want to understand how the glider goes so fast. Makes no sense to, but it is happening. I am just getting into gliders now, and would just like to understand it...wouldn't try that trick for years. Cheers
th3dud3007 2 years ago
Oh, is the plane being sold yet?
greatplanesman 2 years ago
Almost! I expect to have them available by the end of May...
sll914 2 years ago
... O.O I have seen one of these before, it was done by a balsa plane. after about 50mph the wings just shattered, there was nothing left of them. Now im wondering what the g-forces are on that poor thing. that is truly amazing.
DaleSparrow 2 years ago
Calcs suggest acceleration of around 40-60Gs varying with speed, circuit size, and how smooth you are on the elevator...
sll914 2 years ago
I am stunned. thinking that the body weighs mabe 700 grams or 1 kilo? (I cant see but it seems to be the size of chucky)
then those wings can hold over 60 kg... Damn amazing. that is a extremely well built plane.
DaleSparrow 2 years ago
What's the science behind this wind action? The wind blows one direction on the side of the hill or multiple directions? What is the trick to getting the plane to that speed? Where are the forces pushing that plane?
Delticola 3 years ago
It is called Dynamic Soaring. The plane extracts energy by moving between airmasses with different velocities. In the video, the wind is coming from the right. We are flying on the back side of a ridge. The air behind the ridge is basically still. Every time the plane moves from the still air into the 50mph headwind, it gains 50mph of airspeed. Repeat with each circuit while trying to minimize losses and eventually the plane really gets moving fast!
sll914 3 years ago
Wow, I wonder how long it will be until someone approaches Mach 1? The record has been increasing by around 50-75 MPH per year, hasn't it?
v16050118130114 3 years ago
That's an interesting thought, although I think that because the sailplane would be going at the wave propagation speed (speed of sound) the wind would not be able to impart anymore energy into it, hmm.
AlessandroAUS 3 years ago
Near mach, but I think it would be powered flight to achieve Mach 1. Also, the plane might explode (quite literally), which is generally the result of an airframe being pushed too much...
greatplanesman 2 years ago
I'd imagine quite a while. mach 1 is approximately double this speed!
nathan87 2 years ago
lol, I was flying gliders with my sisters boyfriend and her friend today and they told me about this video and I didn't believe them but SHIT they were RIGHT!!! 357 MPH!!! that's almost like impossible!!! I thought it was a mean sound it made when ours went past us but now I no it can almost sound like a jet!!! AWESOME VIDEO!!!
LP640Murcielago 3 years ago
crap it sounds like an jet aircraft approaching!!
dieselstruck 3 years ago
Forget my 375 comment, I just figured out I was looking at the wrong part of the display.
Oops.
w7mag 3 years ago
And almost forgot,
Where abouts was this taped?
Looks like the high desert of So Cal.
(Acton, Palmdale area?)
w7mag 3 years ago
You are correct. Just an hour or so North of Palmdale...
sll914 3 years ago
I noticed at about 1:32 when the camera zooms in on the display, it appears to read 375 I'm almost certain that's a 7 and not a 2,
Anyone concur?
In any event, NICE VIDEO and FLYING!!
Paul
w7mag 3 years ago
Your right
that's definitely 375!
AlessandroAUS 3 years ago
I want to learn the name of the radar gun.
yabukogi 3 years ago
The gun is a high speed version of the Talon by Kustom Signals. Contact Phyllis or Maurice @ 1-800-4-kustom to get one.
sll914 3 years ago
The guy that designed this radar gun must be a genius.
Annal85 3 years ago
I agree! Maurice is the first guy to make a commercially available gun to read that fast. Certified genious ;o)
sll914 3 years ago
found it muck :)
118bigtom 3 years ago
thats almost as fast as my piper cub goes.
judaspriestfan16 3 years ago
Outstanding work. Even for the videographer. And radar man.
For the disbelievers, this sailplane is "powered" by the sun. Really. Sun causes wind, wind hits mountains and is curved up. The vertical component of this wind provides the energy to lift the plane, counteracting gravity. Flying orbits, it COULD climb until the wind no longer curves up from the mountains. Instead, the pilot keeps it in an orbit, varying the altitude to maintain the energy. Speed or altitude.
slyputz 3 years ago
Actually, altitude plays almost no role in building the speeds here. This is not a simple trade off from kinetic energy to potential energy (speed or altitude). Dynamic soaring relies only the velocity difference between the air on the front of the slope (40-50mph wind) and the air on the back of the slope(+/- 0mph).
sll914 3 years ago
Crazy!
TheDramaTube2020 3 years ago
Wow that
is amazing.
driftability 3 years ago
wow, just noticed you beat the land speed record by 5mph
weetsie 3 years ago
wow the wings can really take some force.
weetsie 3 years ago
how do you land such a plane?????
jattamasso 3 years ago
The plane is equiped with flaps to slow it down for landing. It can 'hover' in about 35mph of headwind...
sll914 3 years ago
Ahh, good. A speed demond can go slow :)
How fast do the flaps slow it down?
greatplanesman 3 years ago
Congratulations for your splendid Kinetic project and the World Record Mr. Spencer!
lineudc 3 years ago
Hmm, 357mph with a glider? Can you specify a bit more on the servos/battery/receiver/radio system used?
greatplanesman 3 years ago
Mostly standard 72mhz RC stuff. 6v NIMH battery, Hitec Super Slim 72mhz Rx, JR 9303 Tx, and Volz servos...
sll914 3 years ago
Any chance that I could try next time I'm in your area :D
greatplanesman 3 years ago
i dont get how this is possible. What propels it to those speeds?
nolsmtm 3 years ago
it is not a propeller you moron. It's a glider. only wind lol
jattamasso 3 years ago
Google Search 'Dynamic Soaring' to learn more about the concept. Bottom line is manipulating the difference of 50mph wind on front of the ridge and relatively still air on the backside of the ridge.
sll914 3 years ago
JEEZ that wing must be solid wood or c.f . !
ratheads 3 years ago
The plane is hollow molded and is made mostly of carbon fiber with some kevlar and fiberglass...
sll914 3 years ago
spencer is da man! I can barely push over 110 with my Ferox
alexschweig 3 years ago
crazy
Mp3R4E 3 years ago
Amazing. I just recently discovered these types of gliders and I never in a million years would have guessed this could be done with a glider. Incredible.
rmp5s 3 years ago
unreal
codykoffel 3 years ago
krazy
betochperu 3 years ago
How ON EARTH CAN YOU CONTROL THAT THING? IT HAS DISAPPEARED BEFORE YOU HAVE EVEN SPOTTED IT!!! EVEN I FEEL STRAINED SOMETIMES WITH MY 110 MPH ARC JUPITER!!!!!!! HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU FLY THAT AT THOSE SPEEDS!!??!?!?!?!
Irvine5312x6ma 3 years ago
Practice.
greatplanesman 3 years ago
Great work, God Bless Chris
chrisandrenee 3 years ago
Awesome work:)
miniblade35 3 years ago