Added: 2 years ago
From: Games
Views: 212,582
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (358)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • when you think about it, sins of a solar empire is like the space version of this game!

  • New gaming forum at clubmdma.binhoster(dot)com just getting started, we need admins so if you want just message me, also register; and suggest a game to be added introduce your self say hello! hoping to make this a very successful board; IPB payed forum.

  • illuminate fck yeah

  • I know the truth 8 plus === plus Capital D is equal to 8===D

  • i know the truth behind that war..... shell i spoil it...

  • I played this game first, then played sc1. SC1 feels like the sequel to SC2.

  • @falkerhard i know same :D, and SC1 is alot better but SC2 is still good :)

  • Red alert 3 is better than this

  • este jogo é mais vida real!!!!!! gostei mesmo so que é comprado

  • Rated E

    For fantastic violence

  • UEF FTW ! ! !

  • Comment removed

  • It should be cool if they make a movie.

  • Too bad this game turned out to be absolutley rubbish compared to the original.

  • @WNxAtlas ya sc1 but this is ok for everyone and forged alliance is just retarded i think

  • @Alysha9607 LOLOLOLOLOL

  • in every game there's a team no one wants to play as... in this game that used to be the aeon, but this game, even they seem cool in this one

  • @9eberra2 the Aeon were always The best team

  • i dont know why there are so many haters to this awesome game

  • @Vietnamiec12 aeon is better

  • lmao illumanite has the most expermentals and the best even though they are kindof overspecilized. they dont have the burst damamge of other fractions but they have the most dps. and navy isnt worth shit agianst 10 properly managed sea hunters. uef is bull because there fighters and bomers are weaker then weedoboth and there expements are week as crap exept flying fortress. say illumante are weak after you face loyaty guns and UC spam. cybans are now OP cuase 15 monkeylord in 20 mintes= bacerape

  • @shadar11x Or you just build a loyalty gun and say "all your base are belong to us."

  • Supcom FA was so much better. More units, more potential, bigger maps more destruction and was more balanced. Supcom II is good too, but after FA I expected something even bigger. I'm kind of disappointed somehow. Still UEF fucks all with their artillery and navy and the cybran with they flying units. Aeon has no navy and to my oppinion the weakest of all 3 fractions. Former Units which were absolutely devastating reduced to low damage....

  • there should be a movie for Supreme Commander and Supreme Commander 2

  • @Vietnamiec12

    You're wrong.

    AEON RULEZ!

  • @matlofot stfu UEF VICTORIA!

  • supcom 2 is all most as good as supcom FA but I like both equally, but what i like supcom 2 is you dont need to wait 2 hours to get a major exp and a match gose by faster thaN supcom FA. Also research is a nice addon

  • this game is fuckling awesome

  • this dosent look as good as the first one... ive not played this , i did think about it once but the ingame vids didnt look too realistic.

  • So much potential.. so suck game..

  • @symonglorian Agreed, this game could have been good

  • Im a Banana

  • when i poo i pee.

  • illuminate suck alot and when i play with them i feel sick :S

    uef are cool

    but cybrains are supreme

  • aside from the noah unit cannon (love it), the cleaned up ui, and better graphics, this was worse than the original, although that said, if you are new to the series,get this one first so you know the story for the third incase you ragequit from how bad the game is compared to the first

  • @novantha1

    I thought the graphics are suppose to be worse than the original. Maybe I'm mistaken.

  • @Soulsphere001 the graphics are more...cartoonish in style in supcom 2,but they are better, and i'll admit, it's alot easier on the computer processor even in large games, and it plays alot faster, but comparitevely, the lack of a realtech tree makes it worse in alot of ways

  • @novantha1

    I bought it some time back, but only played 91 minutes of it. I'm reinstalling it now, though, and maybe I'll get into it this time.

    Yeah, I'm not sure I'm please with the way they implemented research in the game. Plus, the economy change doesn't make a lot of sense. I liked the fact that you or an opponent could stall your economy.

    One thing I do is like the idea of being able to upgrade existing units. I never did like being forced to rebuild almost everything.

  • @Soulsphere001 theres new patches and an EPIC dlc pack on PC

  • meh. 1 was better.

  • @MrBlandandboring In my opinion, they are 2 totally different games. and i like them both

  • cybran ftw magnatron pownds all

  • All HAIL The Illuminte!

  • Go Cybran cmon there gonna win

  • There will be no seraphims because they were defeated at forged alliance

  • Go Cybran!!!

  • This game got boring quickly. Took me like 4-5 hours to complete a mulitplayer game. Got tired of it

  • It remember me to the old strategy game "Metal Fatigue". It looks really good ;)

  • Seraphim Rules!

  • @67briann dude Seraphims not even in the game...

  • @ZaneDragonknight i think hes talking about forged alliance...

  • @Vietnamiec12 Bah, UEF rules.

  • This is not and 1 man army. u can have like +500 units just in your control.

  • starcraft 2 hands down destroys this game but this game still looks hella crazy im not going to lie

  • @bioniclemaster1 I have both games, although StarCraft 2 is good, i don't play it anymore, got boring FAST. SupCom 2 i do still play. And based on your comment you don't own SupCom2? So how do you have any idea how good it is. :/

  • @bioniclemaster1 starcraft 2 sucks blizz ripped everyone off

  • SUPCOM 3 PLZ! and make it harder than #2... 2 was too easy.

  • who are the nubs who disliked this?

  • @Thechongtuong

    some dudes who can't handle complex rts ;)

  • if i play this, i'll definitely shouting "GO MY MINIONS, DESTROY THEM ALL! MUHAHAHAHAHAHA....."

  • @hanzip I did it too

  • @hanzip been there, done that, just don't let mental health nurses see you...lots of bodies and paperwork to deal with

  • this game is nothing like supcom 1 and fa it is rly fun on multi but the story sucks and the ais are way too easy so if you want a real rts just hope and see if they fix there falts in the 3rd one

  • i think all u guys who says best strategy games ever i think u need to check out this game called metal fatigue it has robots and all these even before this game company was named so (:-)

  • @sainathi34 Yeah that pretty much just looks like Gundam, apart from the robots look slightly less like cross dressers. SLIGHTLY.

  • $3.75 on steam... GET IT NOW BEFORE THE DEAL RUNS OUT TOMRROW!!!

  • @MooreProductionsMP3 more like $3.75 on steam... go and find a copy of SupCom + Forged Alliance :P

  • lul i bot this 4 10 buks on blak friday

  • @Vietnamiec12 Hell yeah!

  • stop the seriphim!!!

  • @WhiteValkery they took them out

  • @B4n5h33Chess

    i know.. it was a joke lol

  • آقاخامنه ای امام ۱۵ ما شیعیان لطفا پرونده مجروحیت شیمیائی من را پیگیری کنید ؟۲۰ ملیارد دلار خرج لبنان کردن دزدی از بیت المال است . اگر مسلمانی بداند مسلمان دیگری در رنج و گرسنگی است مسلمانی او کامل نیست.

  • Starcraft 2 forever!

  • @Immortal097

    star craft 2 sucks ^^

  • Can't beat Starcraft 2!

  • @Vietnamiec12 UEF OWNS

  • is this worth buying?

  • @Boneparte09 gets old fast. if you buy the unit pack for 10$ it will be much more worth it

  • @Boneparte09 definatley its epic

  • the first one is much better then this. i think there are not enough units

  • omg this looks poor (graphics) ;(

    first game rlz even expansion is making overpovered mind :D (missions)

  • textures are very poor even i can make it better

  • i cried tears of epicness and almost drowned in them *sniff*

  • Ah, at least alot of people, like 16 year old kids and such are enjoying this game, i think i might buy it, and the first one i might get as well. But i hate it when somebody mentions it, and then people start to troll the game like its some kind of sin. The game play was changed, who gives a FUCKING DAMN ? the game is intriguing and fun, and that is where it counts. And there is a Cyber Tyrannosaurus, who THE FUCK sees that in a RTS game thats badass as that? This game rules, nuff said :D.

  • The Unit Cap is Awesome lol, i like being the Cybran

  • @pimpkurosaki Cybrans are like Brother Hood of Nod, both are awesome :D

  • I don't like THQ games..not all that..

  • I want seraphims :(

  • These trailers are notthing in comparison to the trailer for the first game...

  • I played the first one as well as TA (awesome games), but this hasn't got anything against sc2. Soley opinion though. Love the trailers :)

  • 0:26 that part of the song is also from the star wars empire at war trailer

  • what faction is shown at 0:41?

  • @slipandbleed The Cybran faction. The units shown on screen are the Megalith 2 and the Loyalist assault bot.

  • @russiarolesLOL okay, thanks

  • @slipandbleed its the cybran nation

  • supreme commander is much better than SC2. SC2 didnt have the things that made SC so good. :(

  • Too bad they had to dumb this game down for the world of idiots

  • #FTW Go Movie World . com #CUTE has this

  • this is my favorite game ever!!!!!!!!!1

  • sci fi medial war style warfare? that just doesn't make any sense

  • @ItsKadBuddy well I know its a matter of opinion but I wouldn't say its a "Good rts" though I guess if you like Supcom 2 you would like halo wars as well now that I think about it.

    They both felt way to simple to me. And I cant stress the word 'simple' enough with just words, I mean really REALLY simple... but that just my opinion.

  • @AzaIndustries well yeah,if they made it JUST FASTER,and still let it be complex like the original,it would had been the RTS of the year

  • @AzaIndustries if you wanna see an RTS that REALLY FUCKED UP an entire series go and try Command And Conquer 4

  • @100EUROi lol true. I'm sure if we thought about it we could find many games that ruined series.

  • i got it and it rocked!

    

  • Jesus Christ devs stop dicking about and make a sequel to a good game like Total Annihilation already.

    And don't make it some weeaboo faggotry like this game.

  • It's not really supreme commander anymore... Its now supreme bum rusher. Sad to see what could have been a good series ruined. Oh well I still have FA! =D

  • @AzaIndustries it's still a very good game,just because it's not like the original doesn't mean it's bad,i find it better just because it's faster,since i don't have too much free time lately,and the games here are very quick.

  • @100EUROi yeh but since they changed it the series wont ever go back and we have lost a very original style of play. Same as what they did with the new splinter cell. Why can't they release these games under different names instead of ruining a series. You wouldn't like it if your favorite TV series got totally recasted would you.

  • Comment removed

  • wtf u stupid nerds

    in every singe video of rts games (most of them) i find people saying "this games suck dont buy it" "the first 1 is better" "this game is booring"

    well who the fack are u to judge just say nice and let people try it..

  • Your in for a world of disappointment. I was an original beta tester for Supcom1 back in Oct 06 and have played since then, I love it, its the best thing for me since total annihilation. This, THING, that someone called "supcom2" is not Supcom 2, it does not deserve to be a part of the franchise. Its a deeply compromised wasted game thats had a bucket of water added to its mix to make it easier for console kiddies to swallow. Its a betrayal of a loyal fan base.

  • I LOVE RTS but suck at them so hopefully im not on ur team/faction rofl

  • If you want to know if a particular type of game is fit to be played on a console answer a simple question: Would a wodlc-class Starcraft player be competitive in tournament play using a game pad? Would a tournament-class quake or CS player be competitive with a game pad?

  • i have to agree

  • Sadly SC2 Suck hard :(

  • @ixonixas fortuneately you are wrong, it is a beast game>:). it is the best startegy game i've played.

  • hands down a very awful game. If you like the first supreme commanders, Dont buy this trash unless you get it for five bucks or less...

    A discrase to the supreme commander name.

    Made for little kids, who like Halo Wars.

    No real, in depth feeling to it.

    Overall fail game.

  • @drmurda oy prick sit down and shut the fuck up this game is fuckin epic the first one was over complicated and slow this one more fast paced and actiony better systems and oh yeah im sixteen and i love it so sit down shut up and go play the first one if you dont like it

  • @zanumee211 ROFL!, "first one was over complicated" You dumb fuck, Stop QQing because your too dumb to play a real game and go back to Halo Wars... Moron...

  • @drmurda oh shut up dumbass your hating on the game becaue the designers made it easier for younger players if you hadnt noticed dumbshit look at the sc1 case it sais 12+ in bold on the front thats who it was aimed at

  • @zanumee211 oh shut up up kid and go play halo wars ya fuckin narrow minded moron

  • uh FlippieX....a head is a head always on top.....thats 99% true.....they could be a alien race out there with heads put where our balls should be....it could be anywhere but remember i said COULD!

  • OMG i want this so badly i had the first one and it was best strategy game i ever played ever

  • @XnobodyXxXx its a big disapointment i got it and its to easy :(

  • @XnobodyXxXx my uncle played this and he said only graphics where good and he also said that this sucked ass compared to the first one

  • @XnobodyXxXx its realy nothing like the first :'( damn fucking shame what they have done

  • @XnobodyXxXx  it suks dont buy it you'll hate it if you love the first one

  • @XnobodyXxXx

    download it then.

  • when the Titans try to march in sync at 0:55 - 1:00 FAIL

  • Sorry burst everyone's bubble ,but if your looking for a game that was challenging like in Supcom 1. then Supcom 2 isn't for you. Go look at a PLAYER review and not a IGN or Gameinformer review.

  • can someone please explain me why my tactical missile defence while im playing the illuminates always shot all the missiles i have to counter only one nuke

  • It's yet another bug in the game. Don't worry they'll take their time to patch that once they enable save for skirmishs...

  • does it matters that im playing the xbox version or they wont fix the xbox version

  • cuz the game is made stupid?

    i like grapfics only

  • Hi guys, i have a question: what's the average lenght of time for a skirmish and a multiplayer game in SupCom FA and SupCom2??

    Thx and sorry for english mistakes =)

  • @francky3000 depends from ur computer; the gameplay slows down automatically if ur playin skirmish, especially against multi ai's

  • This is gonna be an awesome stratergy game, unfortunately not coming out till 1st April, NOOO!, for me anyways :,(

  • I heard this game really sucked... they took out all the cool parts of SC2 :(

  • No, it's much better, it's just different than original.

  • From what I read, they really gutted the original economic mechanics.

  • if you read all the reviews the score is between 8 or 9 out of 10. It's pretty much one of the best RTSs ever made.

  • @FluidDeconstructor Yeah but it REQUIRES Steam. In my book, that's an Epic Fail. Besides the 8 - 10 score was given by ADD-ridden kids who don't know what a RTS game should be...

  • steam is amazing

  • Player review however tell different stories. They replace the old tier tech system with direct research tech tree, you research your experimentals faster than previos game, just that building they will be costly both economy & more importantly-time. So, your frontline offense & defense will always be the basics, and they can even bring down experimentals with upgrades and tactics. This game is more towards to how you fields your army & not how fast you reach tier tech then got the game enders.

  • I did buy the game today :D

  • The best game ever made !!!!!!! The UFO Looks little like that one in Inpendence Day With the big blue laser

  • WHERE'S THE WHITE HOUSE!?

  • first thing to be destroyed i think...whell thats what was happening in the demo but idk

  • eat that shit ps3 wait you cant lololol

  • aww.. when did illuminate take over aeon!

    in forged alliance illuminate and seraphim got destroyed and Aeon restored under queen´s rule.

    I really liked Aeon.

    I demand original storyline and Aeon back!

  • yay its also for xbox 360 !!!

  • little correction, the Kriptor can fire while walking

  • whats the name of this song?

  • The King Kriptor can withstand a nuke, it will render him immobile for 3 secs, but a nuke only cuts it health in half. and the best part is, this experimental has 37500 health points, but it regenerates constant at a rate of 250 points per sec. So if its not constant be attack, you're just wasting units. (and even this unit can be carried by the experimental transport)

  • ok for every one that has doubts about some of the power of the experimentals, the king kriptor (UEF) is the answer against the colussos. Its more then twice the price of fatboy, and it has two weaknesses, it cant go antiair and it cant shoot while walking. Apart from that, the exp assault bot, has two major pulse weapons with splash damage, three; three-barrel guns en a spinning head that fires tactical missiles. this machine is serious unit on battflefield,

  • The head is actually between its giant shoulder, the turrent that firing missles is not the head.....

    Oh yes, its rediculous that it can withstand a nuke, but not an ACU death explosion!?!? How much damage are we talking about? 30000 or 25000?

    Love it like all experimental units, but my personal favorite are the Soul Reaper II & Megalith II. And yes, I'm a Cybran player. XD

  • what are you talking about. A kriptor can withstand a commander blast with ease.. a head is always on the shoulder, not between, the command can be in the chest, but a head is a head, always on top. the megalith is not that strong, and i was a cybran player, but they cancelled out the spiderbot and that is a shame, he was my favorite exp.

  • @FlippieX Hmm, sorry cause I haven't played the first SC & Forge Alliance. Our point of view maybe a lot different. Megalith is complelty useless when alone, but in a long range harassment attack and support, its formidable if well supported, besides, you can't just use Megalith alone like the first game, right? Just like Fatboy. Throughout the game, smaller unit will always have an important role. Thats why most tech benefits the basic "puny" unit and not experimentals.

  • @willychong8921 that could make a huge difference. In supcom1 and also in FA. The experimentals were the rulers of the battlefield. They were incredible strong, but those also took long to build and were so much more expensive. for example a galatic colossus only had to shoot for 2 sec at a commander to destroy it. Megalith didnt had lasers.

  • @willychong8921 But the megalith (FA) never was that strong. The most famous exp was the spiderbot (cause it was in the trailer), it could fire anti-air, torpedo's, normal shots and had a huge laser on top, it could also make itself invisible on radar.