Added: 4 years ago
From: them0biustrip
Views: 106,037
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (97)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheJodee21 This is the first incident of its kind involving a structure of the WTC's material. Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, there hasn't been any other incidents where someone has taken a jet full of fuel that was intended to go across the country and slam it into a building at what? 500 mph? So unless you personally have tried and failed, or have any other precedence of an incident that, inconveniently for you, does not exist, your comment/theory/idiocy is bull shit.

  • What a weird comment to make. I would like to know in what context he made this comment.

  • @SocialAssasin dude fuck you the mans dead. hes more to all of us than you ever will be to anyone you piece of shit

  • @BrokenMegaMan fuck you and him....im worth more than both you cunts put together

  • The towers were designed o stand up to a plane impact but not designed to stand up to thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel that was aided by the millions of tons of paper and wood furniture that burned with it!

  • The way you fake pray all the time will just kill soldiers FASTER!!

    Spread that oil FASTER!!!

    Bring the fire FASTER!!

    You should have listened to god's words!! Instead you brought DISASTER!!

  • @HepburnFlicks So your just a dumb nigger that posts this on all 9/11 videos? Cool. :)

  • Any old dumbass with a prereq physics or thermodynamics course can tell you that the "official story" is officially bullshit.

  • @mustbeburtreynolds

    if you had any qualifications in the above subjects you discussed , i doubt you could refer to them as dumbasses .

  • @darkstar1345a I do. I took three years of physics and a semester of thermodynamics, and in that time, learned more than enough to prove that the story claimed by the Commission Report is completely absurd.

    The "dumbass" bit was conveying that you need hardly any schooling on these subjects to easily realize that the official story is ridiculous. It doesn't take a rocket scientist, as they say...

  • @mustbeburtreynolds

    i must be more literal when i comment .... when i said "YOU" i didnt mean you personally , I was refering to anyone that does a degree shouldnt be reffered to as thick .

  • Why dont you morons go out and buy a 1.0" x 1.0" dimensional steel bar, then pour as much diesel fuel on it as you can, and ignite the diesel with a blowtorch? If you can make the fucking steel melt, im gonna give you my fucking car.

    You guys give me serious lolz. Melting point of structural steel is 570 degrees celsius... There is no way jet fuel can melt it.

  • @VerifyVolatile and how is diesel fuel? Jets dont run on diesel einstein.

  • @dudeustupid They run on jet fuel... Jet fuel would still not melt steel, whatever classification/specification of jet fuel you used in the plane...

  • @VerifyVolatile The fuel didn't have to melt the steel. when any metal is exposed to a large enough fire long enough, it gets weak. When the metal has tons and tones of weight on top of it, it gets weaker quicker. when the metal get to weak to hold its load it buckles. And on the history channel they placed a steel beam with over a ton of weight over a jet fuel-fueled fire. Within minutes the beam got weaker and weaker until it fell from its supports horribly bent out of shape.

  • @comenter27 Goddammit, go away... this is the greatest fallacy surrounding the entire event, that the steel was "weakened". These towers were built specifically to hold up against MULTIPLE jetliner impacts and their resulting fires.

  • @comenter27 And by the way, your argument fucking fails in claiming that the steel was simply weakened, because as was confirmed by the construction company that ran cleanup, there was molten steel all over the site. It can be seen dripping from the South(?) Tower several minutes after the plane hit.

    You can't claim that the tower fell because the steel failed, but not because it melted, but because it was only weakened, even though there was melted fucking steel all over the place.

  • Well if Arabs had nothing to do with 9-11, then you should have no problems with that community center ... RIGHT?!

  • @mgabrysSF It just proves that the debunkers either know they're wrong or they're ridiculously contradictory of themselves.

  • @mgabrysSF your logic is sound and I have no objection to the community center.

  • I love these clips. These people are speaking their true interpretation of what the collapse looked like without the influence of any conspiracy theories. This is too close to the event for theories to go around in their heads - however, they're comparing WHAT THEY KNOW about controlled building collapses with this one.

    If you attain any intelligence, you will know people have that thought inside them that this was a controlled explosion.

  • @dannyboyinxs You don't think the workers in the building wouldn't have noticed either explosives in there or people working on putting them in? There's concrete proof that it was a progressive collapse, not a controlled demolition.

  • @greenday61892 concrete proof eh? Have you done any research of your own or are you taking NIST's word for it? It wouldn't be hard for workers to "progressively" set something like this up under the impression of "maintenance" and "upgrades".

    If i walked past some construction workers on the street, they could be laying explosives into the ground, but all i would see is some workers working, and therefore i wouldn't really notice or look much into it. It's quite plausible.

  • @dannyboyinxs All you 9/11 debunkers are stupid. Have you truly gained ANYTHING from trying to find the "truth" all these 9 years?

  • @greenday61892 Would we have gained anything by sitting around and listening like 5 year olds being told what to do in kindegarten?

    Humanity would be nowhere without questions. If the human race was up to people like you, we'd still be in the christian dark ages.

  • @dannyboyinxs It's funny because you're trying to deflect my question by asking another one. It's ironic because I'm ethnically Jewish and religiously Atheist.

  • @greenday61892 That's not ironic. That's not the definition of irony at all. That's just you bringing your religion/beliefs into the conversation in the hope of using it as an excuse to "know what you're talking about".

    My question was the reply to your question. My question was technically an answer. You're just arguing that because you are incredibly closed minded and you truly are out of words/answers.

    Also, FYI. Jewish ethnicity is connected to the jewish faith. You can't be half a jew.

  • @dannyboyinxs Jewish ethnicity may be CONNECTED to the Jewish faith, but that doesn't mean that I have to BELIEVE in the Jewish faith. I'm always going to be ethnically Jewish because that's what I was born in, but I'm an Atheist. I never said I was half a Jew.

  • @greenday61892 Alright then, you're an israelite or hebrew...

    But you're still not answering my original question. Oh well, i guess i will never know what makes you "patriots" believe such a load of bullshit.

  • @dannyboyinxs I'm neither Israelite nor Hebrew. In the Jewish religion you are deemed Jewish based on your mother's beliefs. My mother is Jewish, that's what makes me ethnically Jewish. That still doesn't have to reflect my own beliefs though.

    And fine, you want me to answer your question? You would have gained just as much as you have while trying to find the "truth."

  • @greenday61892 aha! "in the jewish religion, you are deemed jewish based on your mother's beliefs"... But you don't believe in the jewish religion apparently. Therefore making that concept void in your eyes. So technically, you're not ethnically a jew to yourself - which is what matters most, regardless of what your mother believes.

  • @dannyboyinxs I'm sorry, that makes no sense. Again, Jewish ethnicity does not coincide necessarily with your beliefs. What I meant by that was basically, no matter what *I* believe, because my MOTHER was Jewish, I will always be ETHNICALLY Jewish.

  • @greenday61892 Yes, but what i'm saying is, because YOU PERSONALLY don't believe in jewish faith, the fact that your mother makes you a jew could be false.

    That's like me saying i'm atheist. but because my mum is catholic, i am forced to associate myself with them, even though i don't believe in anything. I am A-theist. Therefore anything my mum is is irrelevent and false to me as a person

    If you call yourself a jew based on your mum's beliefs, your mums beliefs have power over you as a person

  • @dannyboyinxs Alright. I'll concede that fact. But back to the main point, I'm never going to believe that this was an inside job. People can try and convince me otherwise, but I'm never going to give in. I apologize for getting.... abrasive is the only word I can think up of. It's just, everyone knows this is a heated topic.

  • @greenday61892 And i absolutely, 100% respect your opinion. I'm not telling anyone to believe a certain view - that's what makes you a bloody human mate! haha. The only problem is, there is a difference between the average person that believes the news, and shapes their beliefs on what the news tells them, and the intelligent person that actually thinks for him/herself, okay "maybe this was real, it's hard to say it was an inside job".

  • @dannyboyinxs Yeah, I agree completely. The thing is, I'm not a person who believes these things because I'm told what to believe, but rather that I think of this stuff on my own. I mean, I try looking at it both ways, but it's just so hard for me to believe that it's an inside job. I do respect both sides, but I just can't see it that way.

  • @greenday61892 And that's a healthy way of looking at it! You've looked at both sides, and you've come to a conclusion.

    A lot of conspiracists would rather you believe nothing than not believe them at all and call you "close minded", but the point is, you've come to an informed decision.

  • @greenday61892 The only reason we argue is because we generalise you with all the other "drones". A lot of conspiracy theorists think you are all told what to believe. If you feel so strongly about one side, then so be it, just make sure it's the right choice. I'm personally on both sides - there is evidence supporting both sides of the story, but not enough for me to be extreme "inside job" nor "terrorist attack".

  • @dannyboyinxs

    Jewish is an ethnicity.

    Judaism is a religion.

    You can be jewish withoug believing in Judaism.

  • @greenday61892 and in reply to your "answer" - That's not certain. Listening has an absolute definite outcome of believing one thing. Being open, and accepting every theory, has the possible outcome of learning.

  • @greenday61892 All those "Nazis are good!" debunkers were stupid. Did they really gain anything trying to find the "truth" from 1919 to 1939?

    "All great truths begin as blasphemies."

  • People need to realize the next 9/11 may be worse possilby nuclear, people need to stand against islam..

  • @dangerdanger911911 It's not all Islam. That comment is the basis of some MAJOR problems we have right now. It was 19 extremists, not the entire religion. Do you also forget Timothy McVeigh, the guy who bombed the Oklahoma City building in 1995 was a CHRISTIAN extremist?

  • @dangerdanger911911 TELL THAT TO OUR SPINELESS PRESIDENT

  • @dangerdanger911911 I agree that islam are an extreme religion, but i only stand against those that impose their beliefs on me directly - or the country in which i reside. If they are sending islamic messages to america, i'll let you guys sort that out, but if they start doing that shit here in australia, to me directly? I would help put a stop to that. We are a free society, We have our own beliefs that shouldn't be affected by others.

  • Type into youtube old world secrets the omega project codes and watch it now before it is too late.

  • Wow I didn't realize Peter Jennings was a Structural Engineer in addition to a journalist. Funny that in a demolition you can't fly a 737 loaded with Jet Fuel A into the upper structure. So in that regard he is correct that you have to take out the bottom floors first to collapse the building in the easiest way.

  • The inside story the jet file when the plain hit stated on fire and went down the elivator shafts and blow out the lobby

  • @12musicvideoguy That comment makes.... no sense whatsoever. I have no idea what you're trying to say.

  • true....unless you slam a huge jet line full of fuel staright into it

  • @ColdDish1 thats what happend dumbass

  • @ColdDish1 bullshit !

  • @mrstrongblackman kill yourself you dirty crack smoking,welfare collecting waste of life. Do the world a favor and don't ever reproduce! Better yet just grab a knife right now and hack your filthy minority balls off. Black people like you make white people racist! Fuck you ya peace of shit!!

  • @moeron271 He's joking, you fucking moron. White people like you make the rest of the world hate our country. Goddamn some people are fucking stupid.

  • R.I.P Peter Jennings.

  • ASKconard is right. people gotta let it go.

  • ...besides, if what these nut bar conspiracy theorist say is true, & our own government is complicit in the 9/11 attacks, then it's like the line in the 'Watchmen' movie. "A world at peace. There had to be sacrifice." ...or how about tricky Dick in Frost/Nixon..."when the President does it, it's not illegal."

  • In any disaster, there are always rumors and speculation. I cannot understand why people continue to say there is a conspiracy when there clearly isn't.

  • What I don't get is... the way you say there clearly isn't a conspiracy as if there is nothing fishy. This day has posed more unanswered questions than any major event of the like in history, more than titanic, pearl harbour, even the Holocaust. There are a breath-taking amount of coincidences. And we have misinformed media-puppets like you who don't have a clue in the world about questions you should be demanding answers to. Guess I should't expect any better from institutionalized ignorance.

  • Just because there are a lot of "unanswered" questions doesn't mean there's a conspiracy. Making up crap about ghost planes, controlled demolitions, etc., ain't answering those questions.

  • Because there are so many unanswered you should question it, don't accept everything you're told.

  • they always use quotes form people on the scene that say i thought it was a missile. but for one their delusional about what just happened they don't know what happened and later they relize it was a plane every conspiracy has been proven wrong

  • What? Later they realize it was a plane? What the hell are you talking about?

  • @laswap1 Thank you for thinking for yourself.

  • @GruvyToosday So if someone agrees with your position they are "thinking for themselves" and if they don't then thbey're not?

    Seems an odd definition of "free thinking" when to be a free thinker they have to conform to your view...

    Oh--that's right, your view is THE truth.

    Because there is not a possibility you could be wrong.

    I'm no Bush-lover, but really...they got rports wrong all day long, see there was this terrible tragedy, and people were rather UPSET!

    RIP ALL WHO PERISHED!

  • i agree. i mean, i just think it's easier to go along with the official story because it requires less thinking. all this conspiracy stuff requires doing your own research & stuff. you know; thinking for yourself & being you're own person. i just wanna be like the majority of people. watch the same TV shows & listen to the same popular music. i just wanna fit in & go with the flow. that's all. is there anything wrong with that?

  • I think the vast majority are just asking questions. What's wrong with that?

  • ...

  • Brother of Ken Jennings.

  • Wow that was really stupid the media hates, HATES everything Bush. Saying that is like saying Osama loves Christianity and anything Jesus related

  • you done?

  • what?

  • thats y he was killd by lung canser....truth..

  • It's Jennings.

  • it's weird that all the major newscasters from 9-11 are either dead (Jennings), replaced(Erin Brown), or had their careers destroyed (Dan Rather).  Maybe a coincidence, but it's weird. Some of them like Dick Oliver, a local reporter, just plain disappeared.

  • That's because their bosses are in cahoots with Bush, Cheney and the Corporati Gang. They're a bunch of treasonous bastards. No oversite from Congress, maybe it's time for all of them deadbeat MFs to go.

  • And who is in control of the 5 major news reporting agencies in the world today?

    Bilderberg Group personnel..need I say more?

  • They even trickle down into the local media and influence even the smallest of news media. I think they suck. I worked for one of these corporate-operated newspapers for two years and I hated it and how they treat their employees and act like they are your god.

  • Dick Oliver disappeared? No kidding?

  • That's the evidence that he knew the 9/11 plot, otherwise he wouldn't have said it.

  • More like he knew the physics, with a small p, involved. If you were asked to demolish Sears towers today, how would you do it? Fly an airplane into the 90th floor and wait for it to catch fire and collapse? No you'd hire a demolition team!

  • Sounds about right

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more