whether or not we've had anything to do with it means absolutely nothing because we're screwed anyway. research says even a two-degree celsius increase in mean global temperature would eliminate 20%-30% of the world's species. not sure what kind of "RealScience" you're into, but you should know that's fucking BAD.
No real science here, this professor uses political science to justify claims. Of course there is a greenhouse effect (there'd be no life on earth without it) and are trends of global warming and global cooling, there always have been. Its been much cooler on earth and much hotter and folks, man and man's activities have nothing to do with it. Dr. Thiemens uses an embarassing simple linear analogy and never mind that CO2 is only one greenhose gas and not the most plentiful and strongest.
whether or not we've had anything to do with it means absolutely nothing because we're screwed anyway. research says even a two-degree celsius increase in mean global temperature would eliminate 20%-30% of the world's species. not sure what kind of "RealScience" you're into, but you should know that's fucking BAD.
Booopper 2 years ago
No real science here, this professor uses political science to justify claims. Of course there is a greenhouse effect (there'd be no life on earth without it) and are trends of global warming and global cooling, there always have been. Its been much cooler on earth and much hotter and folks, man and man's activities have nothing to do with it. Dr. Thiemens uses an embarassing simple linear analogy and never mind that CO2 is only one greenhose gas and not the most plentiful and strongest.
RealScience007 3 years ago