@COOLRADIUM Ralliart starts at 32k and GSR Evo starts at 42k. Evo MR starts at a brutal 48k... all of that is before our 13% sales tax. You see a ton more Ralliarts on the road than Evos in Canada simply cause of the price difference. Bang for buck wise we can tune a RA to near Evo numbers for 500.00 and save 10k, all while getting the sweet TCSST tranny.
I'd buy a used GSR over a used RA... but gladly buy a new RA over a GSR. If we had the USA prices... then it really would not be a question.
@CaptObvious75 DAMN.....WHOA. I don't even know what to say. I guess I'm lucky to live in the US then. I feel so bad for you guys. I guess I would have never owned my EVO MR if I'd lived there. C'mon. $48 grand plus a 13% tax for the MR! 0_o. SAD......What a rip off. I consider that RAPE. I payed $33,000 for my MR with a trade and no down payment.
i own a ralliart, the car is bad ass. May not be as fast as wrx stock, but a couple hundred bucks later and your putting up numbers close to evo x. All around a better value than wrx, without a doubt.
@xXTigerArmyXx the ralliart is a quick car and i believe its underrated for its power... the wrx maybe faster but its butt ugly.....im glad i bought the ralliart
@mitsufq360 the mazdaspeed 3 has a lot of power and cheap compare to Ralliart but IMAO i hate the smiley face on the front bumper looks ridiculuos mazda really messed up with the design...the ralliart has a lot of potential just a few mods like AMS base flash, cat back exhaust and intake and your good to go....thats just me....enjoy your MS3!
@NasahrSandi9 I love driving this car! Honestly, I love driving it so much, I take it out for drives when I have absolutely nothing to do, hit up some canyon roads, punch it. I am running a Cobb stage 1 map, about to go stage 2, but I am consistently running 0-60 in straight 5.
I would gladly take this Lancer Ralliart over a Peon SRT. Your right a Peon SRT may be faster 0to60 & 1/4. But a all wheel drive car is just safer in every day driving situations.
One, All Wheel Drive is not more safe (especially in the implementation by Mitsubishi). The Evolution has been known for having the ABS system lock up on very heavy rain. Second, while this car may be better on the interior, it's certainly not as aggressive or good-looking on the exterior. It resembles the base Lancer more than the Evolution.
Well as a Service Rep for Mitsubishi..All I can say is your full of CRAP!
There has never been any known problems with any Mitsubishi anti-lock systems in any type of weather conditions! And as for your comment about resembling bas models.
The SRT is no more than a base Peon with a rear spoiler & 17 rims @ some silly looking graphics.
And get your facts straight about the saftey aspect of AWD cars. They are far safer than 2wd in all conditions. Thats why most Auto Co. have them as a option.
Ha, LOL. Typical car salesman. Listen, you fool, the shitty Ralliart you sell is not worth the money; the WRX is better.
As to the problems with the ABS, go to GTchannel and look at the video with the Supra, Evolution, and RX-7 racing.
The SRT doesn't have graphics either, you moron. The car doesn't resemble the base model as much as the Ralliart does with the Lancer. The front has a completely different design (which the Ralliart does not), and it has a different body kit.
And whoever told you AWD is more 'safe' was high. Its only benefits are increased acceleration and higher grip on certain conditions (though tires have a lot more to do with traction than anything). Having AWD won't magically make it more safe in a 40MPH crash or when driving at high speeds.
You can't even write properly. Spewing out meaningless insults with no substance just proves how much of a dumb ass you are and shows who's the real ignorant.
Also, regarding crashing, I suggest you pick up a dictionary once and look up the word "safety".
If I didn't have a life, I wouldn't be here typing to you, would I? And no, looking at your comments isn't all I do in the day. I just looked at your profile's list of recent activities and this video was in it. That's how I found your other comments. That's only point-of.viee speaking. If you were "inteligent"m you wouldn't be wasting your time arguing on YouTube. You would rather focus on your studies in real life and other important things.
Failed attempt at trying to be a smart ass. And how much you study does not equal how intelligent you are. You should look up what "intelligent" means.
I don't know what "smart ***" means, but whatever you believe, that's not what I was trying to be. I was telling you that you shouldn't be talking to people like (whether it's virtual or real life).Even if they are wrong about something, at least, try to be polite.
you'll need an evo x with the advan's to really know what good handling is all about... taking hwy ramps at 90km/h full throttle in 3rd sliding the back end out.. ohhhhh yeaaahhh... and im talking about the 270 degree ramps.. tight radius
SOMTHING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO YOU AT 9:10 SOMEONE WILL CALL YOU OR TALK TO YOU ONLINE AND SAY I LOVE YOU OR ASK YOU OUT BUT THERES A CATCH Send this to 3 vids
the car better than this. Problem is Mitsu fuked up with the tires. They hold the car down; even Edmund said a tire + wheel change is the first thing u need 2 do; improves stop feet, slalom, skidpad and take off marginaly. And 5.8 secs for a 3,500 sedan with only 237 horses is A LOT. This car has the same 1/4 mile time than a 300C SRT-8 with 425 horses.
and no, the Gen Coupe 2.0T is not near as good performer as this car! new WRX, well they fixed it up real fast! :D
the car needs a lot of work to compete with the wrx, but i think mitsu will get it right in a year of two. I'm tired of everyone coming out with triptronic paddle shifters. everyone's not a race car driver as much as they want to think, and it expensive to actually get it to work on a daily driver, hence the only good ones are on exotics and top end cars. car does look aggressive which i give it credit for that and only that.
bullshit dont u watch Top Gear where clarcson always complain about paddle shiffters on exotics thtast why i think thye re working good on the ralliart as being more of a rally car
Uh, wrong, the Ralliart comes with Summer tires, putting better tires on it boosted the number dramatically and beat the WRX. (The WRX comes with better tires than the Ralliart)
Very true and very significant... It's okay tho cuz a lot of people will underestimate the Ralliart, I took my good friends 05 Sti (Injen intake and Hks Turbo back Exhaust) In my 09 Ralliart (Stock) with 250 miles or so not even broken in yet he was pissed and was acting different for the rest of the day hanging out with me...
wow .80g on the skidpad are you kidding me, with all the hype about this "toned down" evo id expect a little bit more in the handeling department, for that money i'll spend it on a wrx, mazdaspeed 3, or wait for the new hyundai genisis coupe
PLEASE DONT READ THIS!!!!U WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF UR LIFE. 2MORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF UR LIFE.HOWEVER IF U DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO ATLEAST 3 VIDEOS U WILL DIE IN 2 DAYS.NOW UV STARTED READIN THIS SO DONT STOP NOW!THIS IS SOOO SCARY.SEND THIS TO ATLEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSSHES NAMEWILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS THIS IS SOO SCARY CUZ IT ACTUALLY WORKS!!!!!
I dont think this is the video showing where a simple change of the tires it BEATS the 2009 WRX in all but the 0-60, it is amazing the editors at Edmunds think the RAs transmission is BETTER than the supercar Audi R8, now that does say a lot too!!!
not a fan of this video. It looks boring and the car doesnt look like it picks up any speed. I have a few videos of really nice exciting cars. You should check em out.
"Chromebomb" Stock time for GTI for the newer ones are roughly 7s and the older ones are roughly 8s. Who are you lying saying your GTI can run a 6.5? I just checked the sites, go google your time.
You are also forgetting the fact it has sportronic and paddle-shifting available which changes the timing alot. Earlier shifts make for a faster acceleration.
He doesn't. He prefers the less powerful version of the Evo, which is the regular one with roughly 300bhp. He was driving around with the beefed up UK FQ360 version, which isn't offered in North America or Japan.
If you can afford a RA you can afford a GSR.
COOLRADIUM 1 year ago
@COOLRADIUM In the USA yes... not in Canada.
CaptObvious75 1 year ago
@CaptObvious75 Wow.....Really! What's the price point for the GSR and the RA in Canada.
COOLRADIUM 1 year ago
@COOLRADIUM Ralliart starts at 32k and GSR Evo starts at 42k. Evo MR starts at a brutal 48k... all of that is before our 13% sales tax. You see a ton more Ralliarts on the road than Evos in Canada simply cause of the price difference. Bang for buck wise we can tune a RA to near Evo numbers for 500.00 and save 10k, all while getting the sweet TCSST tranny.
I'd buy a used GSR over a used RA... but gladly buy a new RA over a GSR. If we had the USA prices... then it really would not be a question.
CaptObvious75 1 year ago
Comment removed
COOLRADIUM 1 year ago
@CaptObvious75 DAMN.....WHOA. I don't even know what to say. I guess I'm lucky to live in the US then. I feel so bad for you guys. I guess I would have never owned my EVO MR if I'd lived there. C'mon. $48 grand plus a 13% tax for the MR! 0_o. SAD......What a rip off. I consider that RAPE. I payed $33,000 for my MR with a trade and no down payment.
COOLRADIUM 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w.youtube.com/watch?v=eUzIEyKs8RQ
thetremmer 1 year ago
i own a ralliart, the car is bad ass. May not be as fast as wrx stock, but a couple hundred bucks later and your putting up numbers close to evo x. All around a better value than wrx, without a doubt.
xXTigerArmyXx 1 year ago
@xXTigerArmyXx the ralliart is a quick car and i believe its underrated for its power... the wrx maybe faster but its butt ugly.....im glad i bought the ralliart
kitikitiboy 1 year ago
@kitikitiboy i test drove one, and I really did like it, but i ended up falling for the speed 3, seems to offer just a good deal more for the buck
mitsufq360 1 year ago
@mitsufq360 the mazdaspeed 3 has a lot of power and cheap compare to Ralliart but IMAO i hate the smiley face on the front bumper looks ridiculuos mazda really messed up with the design...the ralliart has a lot of potential just a few mods like AMS base flash, cat back exhaust and intake and your good to go....thats just me....enjoy your MS3!
kitikitiboy 1 year ago 8
@xXTigerArmyXx how is the ralliart to drive from a day to day basis, is it fun?
NasahrSandi9 1 year ago
@NasahrSandi9 I love driving this car! Honestly, I love driving it so much, I take it out for drives when I have absolutely nothing to do, hit up some canyon roads, punch it. I am running a Cobb stage 1 map, about to go stage 2, but I am consistently running 0-60 in straight 5.
xXTigerArmyXx 1 year ago
@xXTigerArmyXx wow, I didn'e think it would be that good. I'm might just get one, or a mustang 5.0.
NasahrSandi9 1 year ago
Pretty fucking overpriced for the performance you get, if you ask me. Even a Neon SRT-4 is faster in both 0-60 and 1/4 mile time.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
@Atheismrulez
Not to many ppl want to seen in a Peon though.
GerryK61 2 years ago
If they don't want to be seen in that, neither will they want to be seen in this Evolution-wannabe.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
Speaking for myself!
I would gladly take this Lancer Ralliart over a Peon SRT. Your right a Peon SRT may be faster 0to60 & 1/4. But a all wheel drive car is just safer in every day driving situations.
And Peons are just Ugly cars to start with.
GerryK61 2 years ago
One, All Wheel Drive is not more safe (especially in the implementation by Mitsubishi). The Evolution has been known for having the ABS system lock up on very heavy rain. Second, while this car may be better on the interior, it's certainly not as aggressive or good-looking on the exterior. It resembles the base Lancer more than the Evolution.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
Well as a Service Rep for Mitsubishi..All I can say is your full of CRAP!
There has never been any known problems with any Mitsubishi anti-lock systems in any type of weather conditions! And as for your comment about resembling bas models.
The SRT is no more than a base Peon with a rear spoiler & 17 rims @ some silly looking graphics.
And get your facts straight about the saftey aspect of AWD cars. They are far safer than 2wd in all conditions. Thats why most Auto Co. have them as a option.
GerryK61 2 years ago
Ha, LOL. Typical car salesman. Listen, you fool, the shitty Ralliart you sell is not worth the money; the WRX is better.
As to the problems with the ABS, go to GTchannel and look at the video with the Supra, Evolution, and RX-7 racing.
The SRT doesn't have graphics either, you moron. The car doesn't resemble the base model as much as the Ralliart does with the Lancer. The front has a completely different design (which the Ralliart does not), and it has a different body kit.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
And whoever told you AWD is more 'safe' was high. Its only benefits are increased acceleration and higher grip on certain conditions (though tires have a lot more to do with traction than anything). Having AWD won't magically make it more safe in a 40MPH crash or when driving at high speeds.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
What the hell does a 40mph crash have to do with what we were talking about?
But then again Your just a 17 year old PUNK trying to blow smoke up peoples Ass's.
I guess being on Y/T makes you brave enough to show your Ignorance....SON!
.
GerryK61 2 years ago
You can't even write properly. Spewing out meaningless insults with no substance just proves how much of a dumb ass you are and shows who's the real ignorant.
Also, regarding crashing, I suggest you pick up a dictionary once and look up the word "safety".
BTW, the Lancer Ralliart sucks.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
I take it I must have hit a Nerve by Insulting the Mopar Peon
By your wording I take it... You must either own or plan to purchase a SRT ( Peon with a spoiler) as your 1st car.
This is the reason you spu out remarks that make no sense.
Anyhow Have a nice day & I hope you enjoy your SRT ( Peon with a spoiler).
GerryK61 2 years ago
LOL at your stupid conclusion. I don't either own or plan on owning an SRT-4; however, I was planning on buying a 2005-2007 WRX.
Your comebacks are the worst ever.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
Wow, it's not just on one video. You do the same on this video too!
filipeflower 2 years ago
Did you notice that you also have no life? Is looking at my comments all you do in the day?
Moron. You keep proving how stupid you are with each comment.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
If I didn't have a life, I wouldn't be here typing to you, would I? And no, looking at your comments isn't all I do in the day. I just looked at your profile's list of recent activities and this video was in it. That's how I found your other comments. That's only point-of.viee speaking. If you were "inteligent"m you wouldn't be wasting your time arguing on YouTube. You would rather focus on your studies in real life and other important things.
filipeflower 2 years ago
Failed attempt at trying to be a smart ass. And how much you study does not equal how intelligent you are. You should look up what "intelligent" means.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
I don't know what "smart ***" means, but whatever you believe, that's not what I was trying to be. I was telling you that you shouldn't be talking to people like (whether it's virtual or real life).Even if they are wrong about something, at least, try to be polite.
filipeflower 2 years ago
Do you even have a license you dumb ass.
A STR-4, lol...
Go get a used sunfire and GTFO.
tommysch 1 year ago
LOL!
At least one thing I know is true.
I can purchase Almost any car I want under the $200k range.
And The chance's of you obtaining anything close to the performance of a WRX is Highly unlikely!
And by the way nice web page you have!
I have 10 year old grand children with better Y/T layouts.'
Never mind your choice in music!
I think your mother must have dropped you on your head as a child!
Or maybe she was just a drunk during your birth.
LOL PUNK!
GerryK61 2 years ago
You try too hard. Seriously, you suck at trolling.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
Nice quarter mile... chip that car and tune it... get an extra 30HP out of it.
CaptObvious75 2 years ago
ECU base flash is 50 hp
tommysch 2 years ago
you'll need an evo x with the advan's to really know what good handling is all about... taking hwy ramps at 90km/h full throttle in 3rd sliding the back end out.. ohhhhh yeaaahhh... and im talking about the 270 degree ramps.. tight radius
mikeap1987 2 years ago
Poor numbers on skidpad, braking and slalom.
eknito007 2 years ago
My exact thoughts!
Was just comparing Mazda 3 to this and apparently 3 performs better on the skid-pad, Slalom and 60-0!!!
WTF EVO are my fav but damn it 3 can beat it?
Here's link to 3.
watch?v=5iVrDqCZyR4&feature=related
YourFatClownAss 2 years ago
uhm.. you're an idiot if you think this is an evo. don't bother respond you dumb ass cause i won't even read it.
iamElijah 2 years ago
Go fuck yourself.
YourFatClownAss 2 years ago
All because of the Tires/Rims...
TuQwik4u 2 years ago
is this car awd ?
leabuelo 2 years ago 6
yes
frostyterrance 2 years ago
yes
fattygetsowned 2 years ago
@leabuelo Yes
broodsniper 1 year ago
this car has no exhaust noise!!!
SinaPouya90 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SOMTHING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO YOU AT 9:10 SOMEONE WILL CALL YOU OR TALK TO YOU ONLINE AND SAY I LOVE YOU OR ASK YOU OUT BUT THERES A CATCH Send this to 3 vids
sweetiepie4u 2 years ago
wow never seen a bunch of whinging bitches like this in a video. its not the be all-end all car...
moondy11 2 years ago
Comment removed
Zadok12321 2 years ago
twin clutch, automatic with the paddle shifting option, no clutch pedal
leabuelo 2 years ago
yes, its fun as hell to drive too! i picked mine up exactly 1 week ago =]
Zadok12321 2 years ago
the car better than this. Problem is Mitsu fuked up with the tires. They hold the car down; even Edmund said a tire + wheel change is the first thing u need 2 do; improves stop feet, slalom, skidpad and take off marginaly. And 5.8 secs for a 3,500 sedan with only 237 horses is A LOT. This car has the same 1/4 mile time than a 300C SRT-8 with 425 horses.
and no, the Gen Coupe 2.0T is not near as good performer as this car! new WRX, well they fixed it up real fast! :D
Jazket 2 years ago
its there version of a wrx. if you want speed get an evo or sti. if not get the 2.5i or regular lancer. theres no middle car
crash60068 3 years ago
the car needs a lot of work to compete with the wrx, but i think mitsu will get it right in a year of two. I'm tired of everyone coming out with triptronic paddle shifters. everyone's not a race car driver as much as they want to think, and it expensive to actually get it to work on a daily driver, hence the only good ones are on exotics and top end cars. car does look aggressive which i give it credit for that and only that.
mfranklinism 3 years ago
bullshit dont u watch Top Gear where clarcson always complain about paddle shiffters on exotics thtast why i think thye re working good on the ralliart as being more of a rally car
Matush0784 2 years ago
Uh, wrong, the Ralliart comes with Summer tires, putting better tires on it boosted the number dramatically and beat the WRX. (The WRX comes with better tires than the Ralliart)
Nagidar23 2 years ago
Very true and very significant... It's okay tho cuz a lot of people will underestimate the Ralliart, I took my good friends 05 Sti (Injen intake and Hks Turbo back Exhaust) In my 09 Ralliart (Stock) with 250 miles or so not even broken in yet he was pissed and was acting different for the rest of the day hanging out with me...
TuQwik4u 2 years ago
wow .80g on the skidpad are you kidding me, with all the hype about this "toned down" evo id expect a little bit more in the handeling department, for that money i'll spend it on a wrx, mazdaspeed 3, or wait for the new hyundai genisis coupe
Convenient8765 3 years ago
5.8 sec. 0-60?!
Seems like a step backwards in awd technology don't ya think?
rpzshuuter 3 years ago
Umm... it's not an Evo. It costs about $20K less than an Evo.
danieleriskay 3 years ago
more like 8-12k less
FSUDELUXE10 3 years ago
for a 237 4 cylinder... i dont think so
FSUDELUXE10 3 years ago
the 2008 Mitsubishi Evo X by Vishnu Performance = a whole lot better
tsyunami1 3 years ago
Not impressed. In other words......
DO NOT WANT
didderson 3 years ago
sorry bout that message peoples...im kinda supersticious and I read it and...well...you can fill out the rest.
BrolyHyperBlast 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
do u belief this
oh my god [ -1 ]
PLEASE DONT READ THIS!!!!U WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF UR LIFE. 2MORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF UR LIFE.HOWEVER IF U DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO ATLEAST 3 VIDEOS U WILL DIE IN 2 DAYS.NOW UV STARTED READIN THIS SO DONT STOP NOW!THIS IS SOOO SCARY.SEND THIS TO ATLEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSSHES NAMEWILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS THIS IS SOO SCARY CUZ IT ACTUALLY WORKS!!!!!
BrolyHyperBlast 3 years ago
Is it just me or this car has two track videos
nad77772 3 years ago
i like lancer, but not really for performance
nwonknu8 3 years ago
This car is OKAY
87TAGTABANDIT 3 years ago 2
@87TAGTABANDIT have you driven one?? its amazing
kitikitiboy 1 year ago
I dont think this is the video showing where a simple change of the tires it BEATS the 2009 WRX in all but the 0-60, it is amazing the editors at Edmunds think the RAs transmission is BETTER than the supercar Audi R8, now that does say a lot too!!!
LaLouche123 3 years ago
not a fan of this video. It looks boring and the car doesnt look like it picks up any speed. I have a few videos of really nice exciting cars. You should check em out.
topspeedcom 3 years ago
ugly and boring car.
speedsociety 3 years ago
0-60 time is good... But all other figures are rubbish...
camrygrande 3 years ago
lol at having a V8 engine in a lancer. Pure comedy.
osiyal 3 years ago
"Chromebomb" Stock time for GTI for the newer ones are roughly 7s and the older ones are roughly 8s. Who are you lying saying your GTI can run a 6.5? I just checked the sites, go google your time.
NigguhJason 3 years ago
The 0-60 time is wrong. They say its 5.8 but its 6.7. According to roadandtrack, autos, and other varies sites. They say its 6.7 and rough 6s.
NigguhJason 3 years ago
fool my gti can do like 6.5 i bet the 5.8 is correct
chromebomb 3 years ago
You are also forgetting the fact it has sportronic and paddle-shifting available which changes the timing alot. Earlier shifts make for a faster acceleration.
mtnbiker3669 3 years ago
dual clutch system man
Matush0784 2 years ago
doesn't look like it has enough torque.
mccaslin 3 years ago
I just expected more, and then again I don't really know why- the Evo will likely continue to be the one anomaly at Mitsu... *sigh*
MercedesTwins 3 years ago
wow, this car sucks in every test. Why would anyone buy this car unless they just wanted to be an evo poser?
Alexsered 3 years ago
SUBY ALL THE WAY
yardman8888 3 years ago
I guess this car is good for someone who absolutely HAS to have something that looks kinda like the EVO, but doesn't mind that the performance sucks.
And blows.
A lot.
ShortySIG552 3 years ago 2
But the car costs so much that you could buy last years evo with mods to 375 HP and look way better. Lame and fail!
112namrepus 3 years ago
the lancer looks way better and more agressive, and i like it a lot
but that subaru has awesome performance!
warhawkpro 3 years ago
everything but the 0-60/1/4 times were awful!
MercedesTwins 3 years ago 2
no, just everything was awful.
Alexsered 3 years ago
.80 G? really?!?! that's it?
crownr0yalonice 3 years ago 3
A combination of skinny non-performance tires, and a ridiculously high curb weight for such a "small" car make for such a result.
Even the HHR SS pulls .86g on the skidpad.
The Ralliart is a fail.
ShortySIG552 3 years ago 2
Even a normal Mazda3 posts better skidpad numbers than the Ralliart. Huge disappointment. I'd rather have the WRX265 or the MazdaSpeed3.
FrostedCold 3 years ago
I love the Evo loads. though I am worry for it against the subby
jetslayer 3 years ago
Suby rules
eknito007 3 years ago
less than impressive
stevz0r 3 years ago
16ththththththhththththtththhthththt
mmAiElWhNwLwioLhNila 3 years ago
15th
bradilus 3 years ago
Strangely, Jeremy Clarkson prefers this to the Evo.
HDTopGear 3 years ago
He doesn't. He prefers the less powerful version of the Evo, which is the regular one with roughly 300bhp. He was driving around with the beefed up UK FQ360 version, which isn't offered in North America or Japan.
stevz0r 3 years ago
damn strait!!!! ...probably cause they just dont know how to make a real car!
wesman154 3 years ago
not bad for the money i guess.......right?
adamkawwaff 3 years ago
why we dont just put a big brain on your head instead of that puny hamster you have
NinjahuaV2p1 3 years ago
this is nothing compared to an evo. too heavy, too soft and too expensive. only thing good is the transmission.
ironchopsticks 3 years ago
because they're not idiots
dreamexecution 3 years ago 5
+ 1
adamkawwaff 3 years ago
am i the only one who can clearly tell between that and the evo just by looks?
mrdarkknight 3 years ago
this thing blows
gramatikov 3 years ago
shit
00yugioh00 3 years ago
i think what Mitsubishi should do is make the evo with a different cut i know they can make it better than a vette zr1 so shoot
camelsmaycry 3 years ago
i dont know the 2008 evo feels better than this i like the car but look almost the same as the evo
xXPTRAYXx 3 years ago
first comment...i like the evo better than all the others...
andrezor24 3 years ago