@svecter The US is still the richest country in the history of the world.
Mike Fossom. look it up.
We have a vehical that can get people into orbit right now. It just doesn't have a launch abort system. It's like you are telling some guy he doesn't have a car because there are no seat belts in it.
The US dollar is still the most trusted currency in the world, and trust is the only value of a currency.
That guy really helped you make yourself look like an ass.
@svecter fine.... next time nazis come strolling through europe we wont run to the rescue. next time the soviets threaten to invade we wont stand guard. we have been keeping the wolf away from your door for close to 100 years.
Going to the moon is unbelievably difficult and cannot be duplicated on the cheap by a few enthusiastic amateurs. It requires a dedication and a drive that most cannot comprehend.
An ex-Apollo engineer who worked on the spacecraft said: "I don't know how all this works. I don't know how a millionth of it works. All I know is my little bit, and all I can say is that it's not going to fail because of me."
absolutely laughable ... just watch the supposed departure no exhaust plume ??? impossible to be using a rocket with no chemical reaction... work it out for yourself!
@krisdevalle totally untrue my apollogist friend Bill Kaysing worked for the company that made the rockets for NASA he clearly states a plume should be clearly visible , i didn't hear him mention once that in a vacuum hypergolic engines burn in an invisible manner. watch trodas video LEM problems, failures and no exhaust!
@krisdevalle oo dear are you seriously suggesting Bill Kaysing never worked for Rocketdyne as an Engineer in case you or anyone else want to check his credentials check out WhiteJarrah's Video Bill Kaysing The Service Engineer
Bill Kaysing was NOT an engineer or scientist, he was head of Technical Publications at Rocketdyne, i.e. he was a file clerk that kept track of documents.
They kept trying on every Apollo where there was a moon-buggy, but the delay made it hard. What they did was write the list of verbal radio communications to the guy who controlled the camera, and he had i think a 6 second delay to work with, which made it really hard! Apollo 17 was the only one which succeeded at filming the lunar take-off
This has been flagged as spam show
They faked the moon landings in a studio. Here's a link so some of the evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored 1 month ago
0:30
"I CAN'T PUT MY ARMS DOWN!!!"
dalek14mc 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@svecter do you know you don't even make any sense?
monokhem 4 months ago
@svecter What arguement?
"sticky f*d jibber jabber ( where is that) '+f*k
Now 4d 7**b with your country Y***!
Yabba dabba Ima f***** idiot yo!"
This does not qualify as an arguement.
monokhem 4 months ago
@svecter Are you always this stupid, or do you have to work up to it before you go on you tube?
monokhem 4 months ago
@svecter The US is still the richest country in the history of the world.
Mike Fossom. look it up.
We have a vehical that can get people into orbit right now. It just doesn't have a launch abort system. It's like you are telling some guy he doesn't have a car because there are no seat belts in it.
The US dollar is still the most trusted currency in the world, and trust is the only value of a currency.
That guy really helped you make yourself look like an ass.
monokhem 4 months ago
@svecter fine.... next time nazis come strolling through europe we wont run to the rescue. next time the soviets threaten to invade we wont stand guard. we have been keeping the wolf away from your door for close to 100 years.
ch1ldpr3d3t0r 5 months ago
@svecter i have never had anything against brits but have something against fuckfaces like you trashing america
ch1ldpr3d3t0r 5 months ago
@svecter your calling us fuck ups? bitch we landed men on the motherfucking moon!! your bitchass country makes tea
ch1ldpr3d3t0r 5 months ago
7:21. :')
squigledum 9 months ago
Going to the moon is unbelievably difficult and cannot be duplicated on the cheap by a few enthusiastic amateurs. It requires a dedication and a drive that most cannot comprehend.
An ex-Apollo engineer who worked on the spacecraft said: "I don't know how all this works. I don't know how a millionth of it works. All I know is my little bit, and all I can say is that it's not going to fail because of me."
Synthetrix 11 months ago 2
absolutely laughable ... just watch the supposed departure no exhaust plume ??? impossible to be using a rocket with no chemical reaction... work it out for yourself!
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 Hypergolic fuels burn clear in a vacuum. This is an accepted fact, undisputed by everyone.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle totally untrue my apollogist friend Bill Kaysing worked for the company that made the rockets for NASA he clearly states a plume should be clearly visible , i didn't hear him mention once that in a vacuum hypergolic engines burn in an invisible manner. watch trodas video LEM problems, failures and no exhaust!
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 Kaysing is neither an engineer nor a scientist. Unless you have proof otherwise?
You might as well ask why we don't see plumes visible when the Shuttle is manuevering near the ISS. It uses the same kind of fuel.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle oo dear are you seriously suggesting Bill Kaysing never worked for Rocketdyne as an Engineer in case you or anyone else want to check his credentials check out WhiteJarrah's Video Bill Kaysing The Service Engineer
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 Just saying that he appears to be the only 'engineer' who thinks hypergolic fuels should leave a plume.
Once again, I ask you why you don't think the shuttle is fake if you never see any plumes from it's maneuvering jets?
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@ccc771
Bill Kaysing was NOT an engineer or scientist, he was head of Technical Publications at Rocketdyne, i.e. he was a file clerk that kept track of documents.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@ccc771 No atmosphere
featheredmusic 1 year ago
i never got my piece of the rock! wtf!
tracyterry 2 years ago
ever heard of books? REAL educational books? go find one and do the math. it's common sense. this is no fake.
and stop watching too much space movies. those are fakes.
izre79 2 years ago 21
Yeah,but dont think that the wheel is something new.
ozlnd 3 years ago
NASA are trying to tell us that they controlled a video camera on the moon from earth, with 1969 technology? LOL
Huckf113 3 years ago
So who shot the film of the module once it had took off? I would love to believe we went, then why have we not been back?
ukchris64 4 years ago
It was taken by a remotely controlled camera
ozodog 4 years ago 12
They kept trying on every Apollo where there was a moon-buggy, but the delay made it hard. What they did was write the list of verbal radio communications to the guy who controlled the camera, and he had i think a 6 second delay to work with, which made it really hard! Apollo 17 was the only one which succeeded at filming the lunar take-off
Marlio13 3 years ago 5
there was a camera on the lunar rover controlled by an operator at mission control
nightowl2003 2 years ago 2