And that argument is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. If oil companies had extra oil to sell the would be selling it now. DUH. There is this little thing called OPEC which makes it so there isn't an unlimited supply of oil that producers can just "sell now." Talk about false logic and backwards thinking.
the problem is the influence all outlets have on us...
im 16 and its ridiculous how teachers, news, comedy, all shape young people and its more noticeable to me beacuse everyone around me is so ridiculously mold able
Any explaination involving Jed Clampett can't be wrong. It's sad to say that as simple and obvious as this answer is, most people don't realize the obvious.
1. The video uses the word FUTURE, and that could be in 10 years like the democrats say.
2. Conservation of oil supplies brought the price of oil down.
3. Cash for clunkers is lowering demand.
4. We only get 30% of our oil from the US, and even then they are the first to be cut because its more expensive to make it here.
5. We had an oil man as president, and we couldn't fix oil prices.
6. Yeah use up the finite resources sooner. That's really smart.
locke363 2 years ago
Why would oil companies want to drill here and drill now if it will lower their profits?
ChangeTheRide 2 years ago 2
I love the metaphor below me.
And that argument is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. If oil companies had extra oil to sell the would be selling it now. DUH. There is this little thing called OPEC which makes it so there isn't an unlimited supply of oil that producers can just "sell now." Talk about false logic and backwards thinking.
hiredgoons10 2 years ago
Investing in more drilling today is like creating more typewriters in the mid 80's.
Robikus 3 years ago
it sounds like it should be on reading rainbow lol. in all seriousness though, great stuff!!!
jgueret88 3 years ago
the problem is the influence all outlets have on us...
im 16 and its ridiculous how teachers, news, comedy, all shape young people and its more noticeable to me beacuse everyone around me is so ridiculously mold able
sayanythingkicksass 3 years ago
Video gets it dead on. Its too bad that the media refuses to nail liberals on their constant lies to the people.
There is a reason that most economists are conservatives
Nevarkilad 3 years ago 2
Any explaination involving Jed Clampett can't be wrong. It's sad to say that as simple and obvious as this answer is, most people don't realize the obvious.
ThePoliticalGuide 3 years ago 2
Barack Hussein was clearly the worst candidate of any party.
He would have ran on the Al-Qaida or Osama ticket if he thought it would get him the Presidency.
Everyone knew Obama would have literally DESTROYED AMERICA. Of course those supporting John McCain clearly are intelligent.
Every American will now sleep so much better knowing,
Barack Obama will NEVER become our president, EVER!!!
krejdavid 3 years ago 2
Well done, cute. A five-year old would know this is true. But a Democrat has yet to reach that age. :)
brainout1 3 years ago 6
Which is it Newt, Constitution for... or Constitution of... ? Come on teach, teach!
Signzit 3 years ago
newt why aren't you the republican candidate? lol you would destroy obama in a debate.
PentRw20 3 years ago 5
nteenth?
vvvwvvvw 3 years ago
fourth?
cagedtigersteve 3 years ago
second?
paradiddle1 3 years ago
first?
swtjonesy 3 years ago