It is the same thing with a dog. If they don't listen you have to get their attention somehow. You don't beat them but a sound whack doesn't hurt them. In the real world if you offend someone you will get hit. If you don't teach them this they will learn later from someone else.
there is a third option that explains the data from the spanking/IQ study. Parents that use more violence towards kids, are less verbally capable, because they are less intelligent. So the less intelligent parents spank their kids and the fact that the kids are less intelligent might be genetically transferred from their less intelligent parents.
I'm not saying that is the truth, but it is a consistent explanation for the data.
I remember pulling my sons arm away from a hot stove several times and exsplaining how touching the stove would hurt him. "If you touch that it will hurt". Even when the stove was off.
One day after telling him "don't touch, it's hot" a few minutes later he again was near the stove. However I let things play out.
He quikly pulled his hand away as tears filled his eyes. It was the last time he touched the stove.
Is that wrong? Or should I have slapped his hand or screamed at him?
My dad told me not to touch the hot pipes of his motorcycle, and one day I did after he came home.
I got burned pretty well. I did not suffer any negative long term side effects from this. If anything, I actually listened and respected my father more after the incident. However if he punished me for it, I would probably take it out on him instead of the danger itself. Hope this helps.
Apparently I never went through the "terrible twos", this was actually the point where I became more manageable, that seems to fit with the "empathy developing at two" thing.
I think parents secretly enjoy hurting their children, its some kind of ego dominance. Such violence is only used on children that are young and venerable, never against adolescents that can strike back.
25:51, that's because more of them are poor and there is nothing to take away from misbehaving children from lower-income families. They can only resort to corporal punishment to change a child's behavior. Higher income familes tend to get their child dependent upon something (such as friends, computers, video games, etc) and there are things a parent can take away in order to manage behavior.
Yes, corporal punishment makes a child more aggressive but it's a lessar of two evils.
uhhh....i challenge that. TV perhaps, but internet and computers is iffy. I agree that rich people have more economic 'bait' to coerce a child's behavior.
If you are not taught to distinguish truth from fiction as a child how are you going to distinguish the two as an adult when it becomes harder to change your core ideals? (Not saying it's impossible, obviously).
It is the same thing with a dog. If they don't listen you have to get their attention somehow. You don't beat them but a sound whack doesn't hurt them. In the real world if you offend someone you will get hit. If you don't teach them this they will learn later from someone else.
cchessmaster 2 years ago
school sucks is great
C0MMANDER38 2 years ago
and the meaning of life is...
well that's not that interesting at all
watch the carbs,
try to read a good book now and again,
take occasional walks,
and give respect and good treatment to people of all nations and creeds.
C0MMANDER38 2 years ago
Children are inherently evil & need it spanked out of them!
nanciqwerty 2 years ago
there is a third option that explains the data from the spanking/IQ study. Parents that use more violence towards kids, are less verbally capable, because they are less intelligent. So the less intelligent parents spank their kids and the fact that the kids are less intelligent might be genetically transferred from their less intelligent parents.
I'm not saying that is the truth, but it is a consistent explanation for the data.
modelmark 2 years ago
I am sorry I accidentally gave you a thumbs down when I meant to agree with you.
cchessmaster 2 years ago
I remember pulling my sons arm away from a hot stove several times and exsplaining how touching the stove would hurt him. "If you touch that it will hurt". Even when the stove was off.
One day after telling him "don't touch, it's hot" a few minutes later he again was near the stove. However I let things play out.
He quikly pulled his hand away as tears filled his eyes. It was the last time he touched the stove.
Is that wrong? Or should I have slapped his hand or screamed at him?
deadman12078 2 years ago
My dad told me not to touch the hot pipes of his motorcycle, and one day I did after he came home.
I got burned pretty well. I did not suffer any negative long term side effects from this. If anything, I actually listened and respected my father more after the incident. However if he punished me for it, I would probably take it out on him instead of the danger itself. Hope this helps.
anakin005 2 years ago 6
"I didn't prepare a two hour show".
BAGADOOBLE 2 years ago
Apparently I never went through the "terrible twos", this was actually the point where I became more manageable, that seems to fit with the "empathy developing at two" thing.
BAGADOOBLE 2 years ago
Phylos means friend!
proithero 2 years ago
spanking shows a child that if you do something wrong you get punished for it.
ytgetter8758 2 years ago
spanking shows a child you're evil.
bunabayashi 2 years ago 3
Spanking doesn't teach them why the action was wrong. It just reinforces the idea that you MUST do what you are told or else.....
andrewh817 2 years ago 2
I think parents secretly enjoy hurting their children, its some kind of ego dominance. Such violence is only used on children that are young and venerable, never against adolescents that can strike back.
ALittleBitPregnant 2 years ago 4
That stupid black and white thinking has gotten mankind no where.
DaveDoggOwns 2 years ago
25:51, that's because more of them are poor and there is nothing to take away from misbehaving children from lower-income families. They can only resort to corporal punishment to change a child's behavior. Higher income familes tend to get their child dependent upon something (such as friends, computers, video games, etc) and there are things a parent can take away in order to manage behavior.
Yes, corporal punishment makes a child more aggressive but it's a lessar of two evils.
DaveDoggOwns 2 years ago
Nothing to take away in poor families? TV, internet, computers come to mind, most poor families have those...
stefbot 2 years ago
uhhh....i challenge that. TV perhaps, but internet and computers is iffy. I agree that rich people have more economic 'bait' to coerce a child's behavior.
Gromitdog1 2 years ago
Evil is evil
ALittleBitPregnant 2 years ago
If you are not taught to distinguish truth from fiction as a child how are you going to distinguish the two as an adult when it becomes harder to change your core ideals? (Not saying it's impossible, obviously).
andrewh817 2 years ago
nice intensity in the video, seems like you made this video when really angry :)
Ghastendee 2 years ago
As always, very intresting. Thanks for uploading this. =)
Paddis92 2 years ago
happy birthday man
anakin005 2 years ago 2
Thanks so much! :)
stefbot 2 years ago