I have found through the years. That evolution is very weak. Even average or below average intelligent people see this when they are still teenagers. But because of peer pressure and bullying, evolution occupies the status in academia that it does. I'm glad Muslims can see at least that much light. Now please precede into the light of Jesus Christ.
Ratings disabled, who could have thought. This video, and the comments by MoooHamMad gave me some great lulz at least :) Mythical claims, yet you believe in the bible which includes talking snakes, people living inside fish, earth only 6,000 years old, and much more (I could go on for a while). This video is so bad I can't help but think its a sneaky troll!!
Yes, ratings disabled because Atheists are a very aggressive religious minority that search videos like this in YouTube to rate them as low as they can to compensate for their inability to prove them wrong. I won't give Atheists that satisfaction but I will allow them to post comments because I want everyone to see how easy is to refute any Atheistic claim.
About talking snakes, you need to understand the context of Genesis and I will explain about it in the next comment....
@pogibija The snake in Genesis is symbolic of a cunning creature that in latter Biblical books is associated with Satan, the Deceiver. In Bible, we learn from NT that demons and Satan can actually possess animals. This is seen in the Jerash event where Jesus exorcised a man with hundreds if not thousands of demons. They call themselves LEGION and asked Jesus if they could possess a bunch of pigs after being expelled from the man. Jesus gave them permission.
@pogibija Because Satan is a spiritual being, he speaks "spiritually". We can assume the snake, having Satan's spirit inside, talked to Eve probably in her mind or deceived her into thinking the snake was actually speaking. Or maybe Eve had the ability to communicate with animals using their way of communication.
I don't understand how YOU being Atheist and supposedly pro-Science, you don't know or understand that IN FACT we can communicate with animals. Scientists do it all the time.
@pogibija Scientists now successfully communicate with dolphins. They have associated certain high and low pitched sounds they emit to certain actions. They can actually use keyboards with sound-bind keys and pressing certain combinations they tell dolphins in a pool to go here or there, or press a specific number from an underwater keypad. We also use sounds to "talk" to chimps, birds, etc... Eve simply understood the snake. In reality, the poor deluded fool here is you, not me.
@pogibija Also, the Earth could very well be 6,000 years old or so. Nothing strange there. Evolutionists have turned Earth into an extremely old planet just to fit their theory in it. And because schools are hijacked by Atheists through their religious secular movement, they tried hard to eliminate some discoveries that indeed prove Earth is 6000 years old or so. That is the case of Polonium Radio Halos that prove Earth crust was formed in minutes and not billions of years.
@MoooHamMad Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 , talks about stoning none virgin wives.
Now I don't care what YOU choose to take this "context" in, I know killing people like this is wrong. And the fact that your "god" would even allow thi to come across as his message, makes me a morally superior being.
And talking to animals like you say isn't talking, it is just sending noises to them that their brains
@MoooHamMad can understand. There is no in depth dialog going on between humans an animals like you seem to think or imply. Even if we cant prove 1 species evolving... it has taken billions of years... billions! Not just 6,000 like you Christians believe. Billion of years, our brains can't even comprehend what this is like since we only live for 80 years on average. Just because humans can't understand something doesn't mean we should give up and say a invisible man did it, that gets no where.
@pogibija No one talked about "IN-DEPTH' dialog between animals and humans. Sometimes just a few words are enough to give a command or send a message.
What amazes me is how blind you are to your own beliefs are and how religious you really sound. You say that our brains can't comprehend the magnitude of events happening during billions of years. But that's the point, if we can't comprehend it, then how can we even be sure of something we don't understand unless you believe it by faith?
@pogibija The Evolution you embrace is nothing more than philosophical Greek dogma borrowed by the Masonic Darwin family to replace Biblical doctrine. If you could only understand the magnitude of your Evolutionary beliefs and origin, you wouldn't even embrace it. You were trained (or brainwashed) in public schools to accept Evolution and YOU WERE NEVER allowed to doubt it or be presented with other theories like the ones proposed by Believers (I.D. Creationism, etc) You're just a trained ape!
@MoooHamMad I was a Christian until I was age 17. I attended private christian schools, prayed daily, went to sunday school, and attended church weekly. when I read about talking snakes, men living in whales, ever animal in the world on a boat, read into thousands of contradictory statements, and when I opened my mind to reality I saw the bible for what it was. Bullshit. Plain and simple. God killed, 2,476,636+ people in the bible, Satan, 10. Satan seems like a nice guy in reality :)
@pogibija Once again you mention talking snakes but I remind other viewers to go back a few comments & read what I answered this Atheist with respect to that. The "men living in whales" that you mention and try to portray as an impossible is nothing more than a feeble attempt to refute an event that could very well be plausible. The whale swallowed a man that was too big to digest & was thrown up close to shore. There have been cases of sea animals trying to eat humans that survive such events.
@pogibija You try to ridicule the Noah event saying all world species cannot fit in the Ark. This shows to me that you lack understanding of mathemathics and numbers in general. There is a mathematical formula that defines population growth for humans and one can be developed to describe the same for animals. I have mathematically proven that 8 people can produce 6 billions humans during the time between Noah and present. The same can be proven correct with animal species.
@pogibija You also mention God killing a huge amount of people but Satan killing only a few and thus making YHVH more evil than Satan. What you don't seem to understand here is that such numbers prove one is God and the other isn't. You also seem to mistakenly confuse physical life with spiritual life. Satan didn't kill as many people as God did because he can't but he surely led them to hell or eternal separation from God. In reality Satan was the one that proved to be our true enemy, not God.
@pogibija In the Bible God is a Judge and a just one. He punished people that went astray and were deceived by Satan and filled Earth with violence and sin like the Bible says. If we have a judge that condemns a serial killer to the electric chair, are we to blame the judge for killing a man or blame the man that took so many innocent lives? The judge did his job and took the right decision to remove evil from society. God is also a Judge but in a grand scale judging the masses.
@MoooHamMad Scientists study evolution and what has happened over the billions of years. We can understand what a billion years mean (well us none religious people since we are better with numbers, you Christians like small numbers which is why you think the earth is 6,000 years old) but we can't fathom what its like to live and experience the billions of years. Testing and looking through space shows it, that or Zeus did all. I mean the Greeks did say Zeus did it, why not believe them?
@pogibija Again more strawman arguments. In your comment you start a psychological game trying to create groups (we and "you" Christians) and at the same time you try to place science in the Atheist side while trying to place Christians as far away from it as you can. Who do you think you're fooling here Mr. Atheist? Certainly not me.
Science as you know it today was discovered and developed BY CHRISTIANS. Study some history and learn something. There are more scientist BELIEVERS than Atheists.
@MoooHamMad Yes, developed hundreds of years ago by christian scientists, because if you weren't a christian in their society you'd have your head cut off ;)... funny how that worked! Accept us or else!.... we kill you! Like Copernicus, he lived in the 15th century and made the first major developments into cosmology.
The statement about more scientist believers has zero relevance. Millions of Germans though killing Jews was right, doesn't make them correct does it?
@pogibija Another strawman argument. You are inventing an event in history that is false by saying that Christians beheaded Atheists for not believing. That's simply a lie. If the Church killed Atheists like you said, then for what excuse did the Church kill Protestant Christians? Kaboom....
@pogibija The event in history that you refer to is the Inquisition and Vatican killed ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE for not believing in their Pope, not because of rejection of God or Christ. Atheists have always existed even before Christianity and scientists were never required to be Christian in the past. Its just that Atheists were a bunch of ignorant people in the past, incapable of developing science, as much as they are in the present.
@pogibija Copernicus was a scientist and scholar. He was a Frauenberg Cathedral canon and some claim he even became a priest. He always showed his interest in religion and God and nobody forced him to become involved with the Church of his time. Stop inventing your own history. Gosh, your ignorance is annoying!
@MoooHamMad The fact that your god still kills people is not moral, and I am superior because I know killing is wrong. The fact that you would worship a being who is so cruel is disturbing. I was making a point about Capurnicous, is he lived in a society where he had no choice what to believe, either be Christian and study science, or die (I am sure you Christians would love this for present time, but now you just excommunicate people). You keep saying atheists have done nothing for science.
@pogibija Again more strawman arguments that NEED to be refuted. You want to classify "killing" as a 100% immoral act by force and based on that WRONG assumption, you take from there to "judge" God. Let me help your brain make use of logic to correct your WRONG assumption. If you are having a picnic with your wife and kids in the park and a man approaches your family with a gun saying he will rape your wife in front of your kids and if anyone resists, he will kill them all...
@pogibija There is no help around. In certain moment the man gets distracted for a few seconds. This is your chance to do one of few choices: a) you can try to reason with the man but risk your family to be killed if the man is insane, b) you can start to run & save your own life but let your family be slaughtered or, c) you have a gun hidden and attached to your ankle which you can pull off, kill the man, save yourself and save your family. Which choice makes you "evil" and which one is right?
@pogibija Or let's say you are working for an organization to help victims of war in a war-ridden country. You give refuge to 100 people and the next day a militant looking for survivors from place to place happens to enter the building of your organization, He sees the refugees there and heads to the exit to notify his superiors to send a death squad to kill them all there. But you have the chance to kill him before he exits the door and save the 100 people and move them to a safer place.
@pogibija If you know that once the militant goes out, you'll have no time to move so many people to a new place and they will surely be slaughtered, would it be "evil" to kill him and save 100 people or wouldn't it be more evil to let the 100 people be slaughtered and then you and those at the organization once they accuse you of being a "traitor"?
There are so many situations that justify "killing" that to say "killing" is wrong is a little too naive of you to say. Your argument is flawed.
@pogibija In fact, it would be immoral of you to try to prevent a serial killer from being executed that killed your mother, sister, and 10 more girls in your neighborhood and then allow him to spend the rest of his life in prison leeching the tax payers' money, and writing books glorifying and reliving the atrocities he perpetrated and selling that book from jail while he laughs his ass off at the victims and families while they suffer every single day of the rest of their lives for their loss.
@pogibija In reality you still have nothing valid against God. You don't know or understand God's Judgement upon humanity. Like a judge that sends a murderer to the electric chair and the judge is not to be blamed for murder, the Creator is much more justified to pass His Judgment on evil generations that only do evil 24 hours a day, all days of their lives without repentance. You, as an Atheist, are in no position to judge God since your moral values are subjective and not objective like mine.
@MoooHamMad It's really sad you have become so brainwashed into your religion. Science has already done more for the human race than any religion ever will do. I can only hope you never reproduce to brainwash your children into this cult.
And I was right, you won't even read the few passages I referenced. You will never read your whole holy book. Sad how I have and I dont even believe it ;)
The whole beheading people was done with a guillotine.
You are to thick to even read your book, I am done.
@pogibija Again, another strawman argument, You try in vain to create 2 fictional groups or categories and then put science in one side at the same time you pretend it's mutually exclusive to the other. By creating this false perception, you auto-destroyed your own argument.
Religion is not an enemy of science and the CREATORS of that science you mention were RELIGIOUS people themselves. Like Einstein said once: "Science without Religion Is Lame, Religion without Science Is Blind".
@pogibija I see you like to repeat your arguments over and over again even when already addressed. So, to follow your own game, let me "repeat" my previous response to you. If an Atheist was beheaded in the guillotine for not believing, then what reason were Protestant Christians beheaded for? The logical fallacy of your argument lies in the fact that both, Believers and non-Believers were victims of the Vatican and you try once again to create 2 fictional enemy groups: Christians vs. Atheists.
@pogibija It's strange how you pick and choose what to believe from the Greeks. You mock their belief in Zeus but blindly accept Evolution that was inspired by those same Greeks. They presented philosophical ideas of men coming from fish which is similar to modern Evolutionary ideas. The Greek Anaximander was the first person in history 2600 years ago to state in a poem called "On Nature" that man came from fish. These Greeks weren't scientists but philosophers.
@pogibija What you don't seem to realize is that for these Greeks, it was as valid to believe in Zeus as it was to believe that man came from fish. While you laugh at Zeus but take the man coming from fish seriously, I laugh at Zeus, at man coming from fish and at Atheists like you.
@MoooHamMad Being an atheist has nothing to do with voting down a video, I vote down bullshit. "CONTEXT". So how do you know Jesus was not context? Or noahs ark, the rising of jesus after 3 days, adam and eve, etc.? You Christians are all the same, whatever you know couldn't be true or don't want to believe is true you'll just say its out of context.
Corinthians 14:34 "women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says."
@pogibija And this is what I expected from you. Its always the same with Atheists. Instead of addressing my arguments and intelligently try to refute them, you have to recur to ad-hominem attacks and cheap accusations. I'm not twisting any Scriptures to fit anything, I offered you a perfectly honest and plausible explanation of its context. Instead of accusing me, simply explain what part of what I said is ILLOGICAL to you. Go ahead, don't worry too much about your ego being hurt.Prove me wrong!
@MoooHamMad Ego hurt, illogical? I am not hurt in anyways haha don't be so proud :)
YOU are twisting your own scriptures, they say a talking snake. YOU said it literally didn't mean that, yet it said it. Just like it says killing women, killing people, owning slaves, people coming back from the grave, people living in fish. YOUR holy book says that, I don't think it is true or even "metaphorically" true.
I adressed your "argument" of down rating the video, talking to animals and context.
@MoooHamMad You are the one here jumping to say I didn't adress anything, and then throwing insult towards me isn't very Christian like ;) you should be spreading the good word.
WHICH part was illogical was saying it is about context. The book says there is a talking snake, and no where does it say its metaphorically, it literally means a talking snake.
@pogibija Again, the context in the Bible is what defines its meaning. Yes, Song of Songs mentions a word similar to MUHAMMAD. Does that mean Muhammad was prophesied in that book? No. Muhammad means praised one but Song of Songs is not mentioning any man called Muhammad but a woman in love telling her lover he is the praised one to her. And to go even further, the lovers are symbolic of the relationship between God (the man) and Israel (the woman). That's how Bible works. You are too naive...
@MoooHamMad You aren't even addressing my points about the few bible quotes I mentioned, I BET you won't ever even read them. Thats what I did though, so I don't blame you. I was scared as well to challenge my faith, to question everything I was told. But When I did, I could see all the flaws in Christianity. We don't want to read the passages about god killing, hating gays, burning a million people, allowing rape and torture. You'll just say "you read it out of context". Yet you still believe
This is sad. I really feel bad for these people. You can keep searching for evidence to support your fairy tale doctrine..but I promise, you won't find any. Just accept the fact that evolution is true. There is NO debate. In order to accept creation, you honestly have to close your eyes and ignore every single discovery science has made. If you use that logic, why do you allow yourself to be treated w/ modern medicine? It is the same thing. The same scientific advancements conclude medince&evolu
@mcrAtheist The scientists you speak so much about it happen to be a majority Christians and Jews. The scientific theories and principles you speak so much about it happen to be discovered in the past and present by Bible believing people. Don't make me post their names, dates, kind of scientific breakthrough, etc, because you're gonna lose. Medicine doesn't depend on any kind of grand scale Evolution. That's simply a lie! Evolution is a Greek fairy tale and Atheists are deluded, TY!
Many so called clever teachers also believe the false holocaust story is true, just because the Jewish controlled media told them, kind of reminds me of the ridiculous evolution story.
@HonestMan395 probably because the majority of youtube is filled with a bunch of idiots who believe in evolution and they would thumbs it down simply because they don't agree with him and are ignoring the facts brought up in the video.
@bltX777 True, Atheists are called FOOLS in the Bible. I always say they have a holiday: April Fools' Day though I prefer to call them BABOONS. They hate it because they insist they are great apes and baboons aren't. Lol, it's like telling a kid that thinks he is like Batman, "No kid, you aren't Batman, you're more like Robin, ROFLMAO!"
If evolution is true. We mind as well believe, random hammer smacks to a 1953 Corvette. (mutations) Followed by seeing if that new modified model sells, (selection). Will eventually give us a 2012 Corvette! You got to really dumb yourself down to believe that.
Paleontologist Robert Carroll In his book 'vertebrate paleontology and evolution' says that we have no intermediate fossils between rhipidisitian fish and early amphibians. (the theory of land animals evolving from fish). Wake up smell coffee, leading palaeontologist knows evolution is bull shit but still feeds it to you bottom feeders
@ppsp3 Nature has no intelligence nor is an entity but somehow "random" mutations followed by "natural" selection did it, classic! ...And you can't see what's wrong with that picture? What a moron!
@MoooHamMad your comment demonstrates that you have absolutely no understanding of how evolution by Natural selection works.
Have you actually read "On the Origin of Species", or in fact any serious book on evolution, or do you just get all your information from You-tube videos and apolgetics websites?
Why don't you and the rest of your creatard fuckholes do the world a favor and just kill yourselves!?! With all of the misinformation and blatant lies you spread, I don't understand how you can look at yourselves in the mirror and claim the superiority you do with your fairy tales. Fuck you I hope you slide under a truck and taste your own blood! Piece of shit creatard douche! I'm sorry I shouldn't call you a douche, that at least, serves a purpose!
@ShawnsterVideos Yes, I fear radical/extremist religious Atheists using vote-bots to hijack whatever videos don't agree with their religious views of the universe and life. But to be fair, I have allowed comments in all my videos so baboons like you can spew their hatred and show the world to what extremes Atheists are willing to go to silence any opposition; like they did during the 20th century when they tortured and massacred more than 300 million God-loving innocent victims around the world.
As for Claim #2: You omitted "Some traits are easy to evolve — formed by many different combinations of mutations. Others are hard to evolve — made from an unlikely genetic recipe. Evolution gives us the easy ones, even when they are not the best." (ts-si . org / biology / 3357-natural-selection-may-produce-the-best-fit-but-not-the-best-organisms
"God loving people that believe and embrace freedom and democracy" That is a contradiction in terms.
@TomFynn There are no contradictions when I say: "God loving people that believe and embrace freedom and democracy" unless your logic runs along the lines of "To embrace freedom and democracy, you need to be Atheist" which would be the only logical opposite of what I said. Or is it that you really have nothing to say to defend your religion of Evolution and you have to go off the tangent to avoid people from addressing the real issue here: the Masonic myth of Evolution? Hmmm...
@MoooHamMad In a democracy your first duty is to the democratic process. To other people. In religion, your first duty is to god. There is a contradiction.
"religion of Evolution" LOL, ROFL. LMAO. Do at least try to inform yourself:
@TheLovesoul1 hahaha he proves it? really? i doubt it. Look at thunderf00t his video series "why do people laugh at creationists" He probably debunks all of your bullshit
@robytzu97 Oh yeah, the Great Designer YHVH had such great original ideas during Creation that He came up with creative designs such as the mudskipper. By the way, you don't have to use foul language and behave like a baboon just because you disagree with me; that makes you look as radical as Muslim extremists. By the way, Evolution was created by Masons (Erasmus Darwin revived old Greek philosophy) & Charles made it into a "theory" to perpetuate illuminism (Luciferianism). Read comments below.
@MoooHamMad ....they created evolution ? did you really just say that ? i'm not gonna argue anymore..i've lost all my hope for humanity after hearing that ....
@MoooHamMad your assumptions about cranial capacity... sigh. You can't label the fosiles as fully ape or fully human as "ape" and "human" are just words. i could call a cat fully dog that wouldn't change what it is. And the part about the chromosomes, damn you are so fucking stupid. And stop using the word "faith" and "evolution" in the same sentence as science has to be proven and verified, while a religion runs on faith on some ancient books written by some desert people.
@alliencedful You say: "stop using the word "faith" and "evolution" in the same sentence as science has to be proven and verified". Good one because that statement is exactly what makes Evolution a religion. No one can prove we came from ape-like ancestors nor can it be verified. Only speculation is produced. Evolution originates from Greek philosophy and Erasmus Darwin (Darwin's grandfather) used it to produce the first basic principles of Evolution. Greeks were not scientists...
@alliencedful The very same Greeks that first started inventing myths and schools of thought where they imagined all kinds of apes transforming into humans are the very same idiots that propagated a multitude of gods and fables. This is what you got now: Greek fables promoted by the Darwin family and a bunch of fools that hijacked science to discreetly promote the myth of Evolution by disguising it and protecting it under the shadow of science. A faith... A religion...
@MoooHamMad And lol did you just indirectly state darwin was a greek supremacist? really? How fucking hilarious. Evolution comes from greek philosophy. No it means darwin was thinking about the evolution of life in a philosophycal way, and philosophy was invented by the greeks thousands of years before that. SO you state it's based on greek philosophy. How do you come up with this hahaha.
@MoooHamMad Ok "bro", you can't accept micro evolution and not accept macro evolution.
Macro evolutuion IS a SUM of micro evolutions. Unlike the ridiculous statements in the vid where a dog changes into a dolphin? No sir that's not how it happens. It happens with lots of mciro evolutions over a long period of time. SO you're logicly inconsistent.
As i'm trying not to get mad at the immense stupidiy displayed on this vid i have to say this is some good comedy.
@alliencedful You said: "It happens with lots of mciro evolutions over a long period of time."
Mooo: This is the part where it turns into a fable, a myth, a delusion. To claim lots of micro-evolution processes over a long period of time simply is A STATEMENT OF FAITH. You cannot possibly prove such thing happened. You getting mad or not over this is to me as "meaningless as two goats butting heads".
@gregrutz You said: "It has been proven, look at the fossil record."
Mooo: In a letter written by former Aerospace Engineer Luther Sunderland, he asked senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, Colin Patterson, who has 7 million fossils in his museum, why he never included even one photo in his book of the transitional fossils he claimed exist. Dr. Patterson answered back in shame with these words:
"I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I certainly would have included them...I will lay it on the line, There is not one such fossil for which one might make a watertight argument."
Is that enough to make you THINK or do you prefer our secular Atheistic government and society to keep brainwashing you with Greek myths? Think, THINK, THIIIIIIIINK!!!!
@MoooHamMad Your word plays and sophism do not change facts, and the facts are evolution exists, the idea of a magical beign who can conjure things out of nothing is laughable, and your faith is an illusion. All you religious people do is try to come up with ways to phrase your arguments as to keep the discussion going, but in the facts department you have lost before the battle even started.
@alliencedful So many words, and yet such an empty argument. Nature IS NOT smart or intelligent since it has no mind of its own. Natural selection is nothing more than a delusion part of the Evolution scam. Nature works because it was programmed (like software). Functional creatures like plants & animals possessing a complex DNA map that defines each creature is more than proof of the existence of a God. Randomness cannot possibly produce millions of perfectly functional organisms.
@alliencedful You see, the ones that live in delusion are not me or any other believer of God but Atheists like yourself and Evolution-believing Catholics. Physical evidence studied through science shows traces of design and thus, of God but the idea is shunned by many scientists in their eagerness to keep mandatory secularism and this way violating the most sacred rule of science: IMPARTIALITY TOWARDS THE EVIDENCE. Science has been hijacked by the Greek myth of Evolution.
@MoooHamMad Show me this "proof of design", because if the idea is shunned by REAL scientists, and still a normal youtuber as yourself has seen this evidence, it can not be that hard to link me to some real evidence is there?
Let's do a hypothesis here, let's say there were traces of design, why is that proof of a god? See that's the kind of things scientists don't do. they don't derive things without there beign a real connection. science vs sophism, you are a sophist. :)
@alliencedful The only scientists that shun the proof of design are those that embrace the Greek myth of Evolution promoted by the Masons of the Darwin family. Fortunately, many scientists still keep their brains and logic functioning and reject this Greek philosophy.
Why are traces of design proof of God? A design requires INTELLIGENCE for the idea being developed to work properly and inevitably implies a "GOD". The reason for so many religions is to try to decipher "HIM".
@MoooHamMad that's why so manny species have gone extinct. You know when a baby gets born and has an extra arm attacked to it's forehead? evolution created an imperfect beign. Mutations are not "perfect" they are almost always imperfect, and only the ones that are beneficial survive. This is BASIC SHIT. And nature was programmed? right. why don't we debate the likelyhood of a god. Explain to me if god created the universe, what created god? You're so full of shit my friend.
@alliencedful "evolution created an imperfect beign"
Mooo: "Created". Good to hear you sound more and more like the religious person that you really are. Evolution "creates"....and that's your faith right there. Your god.
There are no mutations that are beneficial. All mutations are harmful. Mutations are the reason for diseases, syndromes, YOU getting old, etc.
God has no creator. He's an intelligent spirit that was always there.
@MoooHamMad Yeah semantics don't really count as an argument, as in my mother language i would have used a more suiting word. and TBH you are spinning in circles. read my comments again if you want i'm not repeating them
@gregrutz Greeks weren't scientists but philosophers & polytheists. Charles Darwin discovered nothing. All he did was promote his grandfather's ideas about his studies from ancient Greek philosophers like Anaximander who 1st stated in a poem called "On Nature", 2600 years ago that man came from fish. His student Xenophanes concluded that Earth was underwater by looking at sea shell fossils on land (the flood?). The poem also inspired Aristotle who references it in his teachings.
@gregrutz DNA proves nothing related to "macro" Evolution. DNA only shows a map of genetic information contained within an acid found in the body that contains within it a carefully designed structure that gives morphological and biological shape to the creature or organism from which it was extracted. If we are to judge by the DNA, it serves more as proof to the existence of a God than proving the Evolution Hoax. In conclusion, you were fed at school a myth disguised as science.
@MoooHamMad Right, Darwin is not know for anything. He wrote a book called 'Greek philosophers knew the water was higher or the land was lower.'' So Darwin proved the land was lower, proving Plate Tectonic.
If Creatards can make up crap to support their religious myths why can't I make up stories?
Floods make mud that kilsl fish and shells so they don't grow on mountain tops. IDiot.
@gregrutz You said: "Floods make mud that kill fish and shells so they don't grow on mountain tops. IDiot."
Mooo: Good that you admit that a flood creates mud that would kill fishes and shells because that is exactly how shells were found atop Mount Everest: CLOSED SHELLS. When animals like oysters die, they OPEN their shells to take last oxygen. So, why are millions of shell fossils closed on top of Mt. Everest? Use your head to think, THINK, THINK, THIIIIIIIIIIINK...!!!
@gregrutz Millions of fossilized oysters have been found around the world and in Mount Everest in a closed-position suggesting a RAPID BURIAL as in mud from a global flood. That is TRUE logic, and logic is anathema to Evolution. While not all planet would have turned into mud after The Flood, some fish species survived in pockets of water at high sea levels where solids couldn't possibly float permanently. There wasn't mud everywhere as you suggest. Now you're left with just a myth!
@MoooHamMad No it's not speculation there is tons of evidence for it. The only reason why it's called a theory is because scientists are consistent with their categorisation of knowledge. We cannot make a species evolve into a lab, so we can never say we're 100% true. Offcourse those who cling to religious dogma grab this infinite small chance darwin was wrong and turn it around and try to push a gigantic dogma in your face. That of a mythical magical creature who bears no explanatio
@gregrutz When Erasmus Darwin became a 33rd degree Mason, he was required to create a dogma that portray Illuminism (a.k.a. Luciferianism). The illuminated (high-degree Masons) believe that man is changing spiritually, socially, intellectually and physically to eventually become an illuminated being under Lucifer's guidance who will bring humans out of YHVH's darkness. A 33rd degree Mason shows this transformation through dogmas injected into society. Erasmus Darwin did it with Evolution ideas.
@gregrutz This is why Evolution places the origin of man to that of an ape-like creature: to reflect the slow transformation of man into a being of light (illuminated under Lucifer). You cannot be something great and full of knowledge and wisdom if you were not first a lowly primitive creature. Evolution serves perfectly to portray this transformation. Another 33rd degree Mason was Joseph Smith who also created a dogma to portray Illuminism: Mormonism.
@gregrutz In Mormonism we start as humans and eventually become gods in the afterlife with our own planets and creatures to rule. This way Mormonism (like Evolution) also shows a slow transformation for humans to eventually become "illuminated"; in this case into "gods". This was Joseph Smith's final test to be accepted in his Lodge as 33rd degree Mason. Like Mormonism, Evolution is nothing more than Masonic dogma and fools like you ended up believing the lie and sadly some Christians fell, too.
@gregrutz If you're not an Atheist, you certainly make a good candidate to be one since you've already the basic religious belief that becomes nowadays a necessary trait of Atheism: Evolution. I'll make a video soon about the true origins of Evolution. In it I'll show how this myth originated from Greek philosophers many centuries ago and then the idea was borrowed by Freemasons like Erasmus Darwin (Charles Darwin's grandfather) to indirectly advance the path of Luciferianism through Evolution.
@gregrutz To address your point #1, Abiogenesis makes use of 2 hypothesis to explain the origin & first formations of life on the planet. One is called Panspermia & the other is Exogenesis. Both deal with the idea that a possible asteroid hit the Earth millions of years ago to provide either already formed bacteria in other parts of the universe that were seeded on Earth after the impact or organic molecules that reacting with our atmosphere produced the first living organisms. So, you're wrong!
@MoooHamMad Abiogenesis is about how life started from organic molecules. Biologists don't care where the 'soup' came from. Scientists think most of the water on the earth came for comets and outer space, so what?
@gregrutz To address your point #2, indeed Science is not pseudo-science but Evolution IS pseudo-science meaning that is not science. That was my point that your deluded mind wasn't able to grasp. Evolution is a philosophy started by Greeks about the origins of life that later Charles Darwin's grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) used as a mean to advance his Masonic agenda and the path to Luciferianism. I'll explain shortly what I mean.
I AM atheist. BUT, irrespective to what you say above, I am not marxist, nor do I hate, or any other of what you say. But you want to take up arms and prepare for war? Take a really hard look at yourself. I am am very kind, loving person, a firefighter actually.who happens to study science and lives in the Bible Belt. So PLEASE, stop making a bad name for us Atheists! By all means, go worship your god... But do it without applying so much hate towards others who wish to think differently
no thumb up or down, now why would that be. also like to add, some lunitic has escaped from the asylum. this video is a deperate piece of fishing. ooooh the controversy. FACEPALM.
**Two: "ur full of shit". English may not be my primary language but I certainly know how to spell better than you do. You meant to say: "You're full of shit"**
Let me help you out with your English. When he says "ur full of shit", he's typing "ur" instead of "you're" to save time typing. It's kind of like slang, if you know what that is. So when you say "You meant to say..", you're only right in the sense that it's the exact same thing as what he said(not typed). You're intellect is a joke.
Evolution has nothing to do with the 'origin of life', that's abiogenesis. Evolution shows how life develops once life exists. You know fuck all on this subject - do something with your life that you actually possess a talent or knowledge in.
It's so obvious that anyone against evolution for a preferred creation ideal is a pure biased arrogant person who could care less about the facts. You began accepting your religion and then looked for anything to support it, no matter how irrational or far fetched. Don't even tell me that you do care about facts if you believe in creation, because intelligent design and creationism do not offer evidence to support it of any kind and thus deserve no place in scientific teachings.
You have to have common sense and a reasonable mind in order to understand all the FACTS you pointed out. However, many don't seem to understand that Evolution is merely a THEORY+Speculation+Presumptions (that all) =Nonsense.
Just because presumptuous scientists POSTULATE on how things came to be, doesn't mean that they are credible. That's the problem with people, they've been brainwashed with false theory based sciences that they reject common sense and reason. Their PHD is in confabulation
@terrymorse- Why do people like yourself always project Evolution as if it's a FACT?
NOT EVEN SCIENTISTS DO THAT, the common concurrence among TRUE sceintistsis that Evolution is a THEORY.......let me repeat that.........the common concurrence among TRUE scientists is that Evolution is a THEORY NOT A FACT.
So where are all you guys getting this idea that the discussion is over and that THEORY has taken the place of FACT? Seriously, you people need to read alot more than just propaganda.
@1Ephraimite Evidence supports the modern evolutionary synthesis, the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Evolutionary biologists document the fact of common descent: making testable predictions, testing hypotheses, and developing theories that illustrate and describe its causes. So if none of those things prove that its a fact, you should see a therapist for you obviously imagine anything against your views is propaganda when what you read was very biased
@1Ephraimite Evidence of common descent of living things has been discovered by scientists working in a variety of fields over many years. This evidence has demonstrated and verified the occurrence of evolution and provided a wealth of information on the natural processes by which the variety and diversity of life on Earth developed. How much do you understand about evolution? Do facts mean nothing to you if you don't want them to? They are so obviously credible, you can actually observe it.
@pat5168- So basically you base your belief on these main words that you've used within your own statements:
Theory, Predictions (a presumption of possibilities), Hypotheses (self confessed educated GUESSES), More Theories-
& by these a rational person is to conclude that this translates into FACT?
I would suggest you continue with your presumptions, calculations of mass guess work formed at the feet of conjured and fabricated Theories that can only lead to more questions than it anwers.
@1Ephraimite You obviously have no interest in learning of evolution so I won't explain, live in ignorance for all I care because you won't even care to recognize how much evidence and proof there actually is supporting evolution that creationism could only dream of. Sadly, I think you care more about what helps you sleep at night rather than evidence that you don't like what it supports.
@pat5168- I'm sorry you got upset because you weren't able to convince me of the PROFOUND understandings of THEORY based science.
I care about FACTS, and you only futher validate that there are NO facts to support the THEORY of Evolution.
As I stated in the prior comment that you replied to, Just because presumptuous scientists POSTULATE on how things came to be, doesn't mean that they are credible.
Being adamant about your position doesn't translate into Truth, relax and have a Coke.
@1Ephraimite No evidence for evolution? I'll need to message you what I think about that 500 characters is way too little for me to fit it all in here.
@pat5168- Look, I can appreciate your fortitude in your doctrine, However, I don't subscribe to such fanciful exploitation of matters that bare no true relavance to such conjectured theories. If you want to peddle your beliefs then you're basically wasting your time on me, I won't be converted into such concoctions.
Simply put, I put ALL MY POWER OF BELIEF IN something completely different then unproven FAULTY Scientific theories. I would think you'd respect my position as I respect yours.
@1Ephraimite I have given you infallible proof that supports common descent, you waste my time with your blithering idiocy by not recognizing the facts.
95% of scientists support evolution, creationists like yourself tend to follow the strict and literal version of whatever religious text you follow, but even people who study those texts have accepted that it should not be taken at face value.
People who study biology, don't agree. People who study religious texts, don't agree with you also...
@1Ephraimite-(I repeat) I can appreciate your fortitude in your doctrine, However, I don't subscribe to such fanciful exploitation of matters that bare no true relavance to such conjectured theories. If you want to peddle your beliefs then you're basically wasting your time on me, I won't be converted into such concoctions.
Simply put, I put ALL MY POWER OF BELIEF IN something completely different then unproven FAULTY Scientific THOERIES...........THEORIES..............THEORIES.
-Chimps have more chromosomes than people, therefore evolution is wrong
This signifies exactly what is wrong with people who are against evolution. They have no idea how to think from an evolutionary view. It's all wishy washy god did this and that rubbish.
@TheBiddleMan They enter the argument with the predetermined assumption that God exists. Therefore, when they hear the information about evolution, they're automatically trying to find God within it. When they don't find Him there, they can only draw the conclusion that the information is wrong.
It's so easy to be irritated by them for this - I'm guilty of looking down at them myself - but really, it's not their fault they're so illogical. They're simply deluded and indoctrinated.
All of the evidence against evolution in this video is based entirely on misconceptions and misunderstandings. I actually fell out of my chair laughing when I saw the dolphin, dog.... err, thing. Where did that come from!?
Oh, by the way, did anyone else here actually read the entire description? This guy is a total fucking nut-case! XD
@buffboynick "Humans stay humans, cats stay cats, Chimpanzees stay chimps (and have since they first appeared on Earth 2 MILLION years ago)"
Simply appeared? Like POOF! Or were they delivered by flying saucer?
"Will someone just sign for these friggin' chimps. I still have a tank of Andromedan Swamp Slime to drop off on Alpha Centuri and I've already missed my lunch break!"
Clearly speciation occurs. Simply denying it is not an argument, it's just a joke.
@buffboynick "Evolution is as much "fact" as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy riding a blue unicorn on their way to visit the Easter Bunny. Directed Panspermia and Genetic Engineering by ET is what is FACT."
Buwahahahahaha! Can we play 'Pin the Irony on the Jackass'?
"There is ZERO proof for macroevolution (drastic speciation)"
That's is complete nonsense. Did you mean there is none you are capable of understanding, perhaps. Or that fits your world view?
Also , Male pattern baldness is a conspiracy against good looking guys such as myself. The government is putting chemicals in my water system to make my hair fall out. I've been buying bottled water ever since I found this out, but my hair keeps falling out. This must mean that they know where and when I will be purchasing a bottle of water and they are contaminating it with more chemicals. Oh yea evolution is a hoax too.
@MoooHamMad No it's absolutely correct, you know how I know? It's prophesied in the bible, and how do I know the bible is correct? Because it's the word of God, and how do I know it's the word of God? Because it says so in the bible.
@MoooHamMad It's also prophesied in the Koran as well. Now , you will tell me no it isn't , but have you read the Arabic version? I doubt it , you have probably read an English translation which is different then the Arabic version. How do I know the Koran is correct? Because it's the word of Allah. And How do I know it's the word of Allah? Because it says so in the Koran.
@buffboynick I disagree. Most notably duw to the transitional fossils evolution is the best fitting theory to the assortment of life that exists and that has existed. However it is possible that evolution did not happen, but alas no theory which fully supports the evidence and our understanding of both geological time and genetic variation on earth exists.
I will be ready to accept your scientific theory, simply publish and go. Scientists love incredible knowledge.
@buffboynick "there is ZERO proof for macroevolution" => DUH, because it takes millions of years for such effect to be seen! Pretty much all speices are defined by mankind ~4000+ years ago, so this means to see macroevolution, you need a macroevolution that takes place <4000 years timespan, which is precisely IMPOSSIBLE as evolution itself states.
one. i could not take u seriously with ur accent and slurred words, two ur full of shit, three im gonna live past 2012, just saying, and fuck ur god. if god was real so many innocent people would not have died this past month in tornados.
@OHS73 ONE: "Not taking me seriously because of my accent and slurred words" is called a logical fallacy based on mutually exclusive argumentation. In case you have no idea what I just said, it basically resumes into this: one thing has nothing to do with the other.
The mere fact that you discarded an entire argument based on my accent and not the content of my words makes you a complete rude and ignorant moron and no more intelligent than a baboon. You basically auto-destroyed yourself...!
@OHS73 Two: "ur full of shit". English may not be my primary language but I certainly know how to spell better than you do. You meant to say: "You're full of shit". These words are simply irrelevant ad-hominem attacks used by Atheists like you, who are unable to confront an argument which logic and content is above their brutish intellectual limitations.
And so do I (I hope). You tried in vain to associate me with that New Age bullcrap about the end of the world in 2012 but I got you. Nice failed strawman argument.
And finally, nature is a mechanism set in motion in this planet that self-adjusts all the time. God may use nature to accomplish certain goals but I believe that 99% of the time God allows the planet to work on its own. I really doubt that God tried to kill people with tornadoes. Grow a brain!
I already started laughin when you claimed that it was ridiculous because it was based on 'Assumptions, faith and pseudo-science'....what is religion exactly? LOL
I have found through the years. That evolution is very weak. Even average or below average intelligent people see this when they are still teenagers. But because of peer pressure and bullying, evolution occupies the status in academia that it does. I'm glad Muslims can see at least that much light. Now please precede into the light of Jesus Christ.
Howie47 1 day ago
Ratings disabled, who could have thought. This video, and the comments by MoooHamMad gave me some great lulz at least :) Mythical claims, yet you believe in the bible which includes talking snakes, people living inside fish, earth only 6,000 years old, and much more (I could go on for a while). This video is so bad I can't help but think its a sneaky troll!!
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija
Yes, ratings disabled because Atheists are a very aggressive religious minority that search videos like this in YouTube to rate them as low as they can to compensate for their inability to prove them wrong. I won't give Atheists that satisfaction but I will allow them to post comments because I want everyone to see how easy is to refute any Atheistic claim.
About talking snakes, you need to understand the context of Genesis and I will explain about it in the next comment....
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija The snake in Genesis is symbolic of a cunning creature that in latter Biblical books is associated with Satan, the Deceiver. In Bible, we learn from NT that demons and Satan can actually possess animals. This is seen in the Jerash event where Jesus exorcised a man with hundreds if not thousands of demons. They call themselves LEGION and asked Jesus if they could possess a bunch of pigs after being expelled from the man. Jesus gave them permission.
The same could have happened in Eden.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija Because Satan is a spiritual being, he speaks "spiritually". We can assume the snake, having Satan's spirit inside, talked to Eve probably in her mind or deceived her into thinking the snake was actually speaking. Or maybe Eve had the ability to communicate with animals using their way of communication.
I don't understand how YOU being Atheist and supposedly pro-Science, you don't know or understand that IN FACT we can communicate with animals. Scientists do it all the time.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija Scientists now successfully communicate with dolphins. They have associated certain high and low pitched sounds they emit to certain actions. They can actually use keyboards with sound-bind keys and pressing certain combinations they tell dolphins in a pool to go here or there, or press a specific number from an underwater keypad. We also use sounds to "talk" to chimps, birds, etc... Eve simply understood the snake. In reality, the poor deluded fool here is you, not me.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija Also, the Earth could very well be 6,000 years old or so. Nothing strange there. Evolutionists have turned Earth into an extremely old planet just to fit their theory in it. And because schools are hijacked by Atheists through their religious secular movement, they tried hard to eliminate some discoveries that indeed prove Earth is 6000 years old or so. That is the case of Polonium Radio Halos that prove Earth crust was formed in minutes and not billions of years.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 , talks about stoning none virgin wives.
Now I don't care what YOU choose to take this "context" in, I know killing people like this is wrong. And the fact that your "god" would even allow thi to come across as his message, makes me a morally superior being.
And talking to animals like you say isn't talking, it is just sending noises to them that their brains
pogibija 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad can understand. There is no in depth dialog going on between humans an animals like you seem to think or imply. Even if we cant prove 1 species evolving... it has taken billions of years... billions! Not just 6,000 like you Christians believe. Billion of years, our brains can't even comprehend what this is like since we only live for 80 years on average. Just because humans can't understand something doesn't mean we should give up and say a invisible man did it, that gets no where.
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija No one talked about "IN-DEPTH' dialog between animals and humans. Sometimes just a few words are enough to give a command or send a message.
What amazes me is how blind you are to your own beliefs are and how religious you really sound. You say that our brains can't comprehend the magnitude of events happening during billions of years. But that's the point, if we can't comprehend it, then how can we even be sure of something we don't understand unless you believe it by faith?
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija The Evolution you embrace is nothing more than philosophical Greek dogma borrowed by the Masonic Darwin family to replace Biblical doctrine. If you could only understand the magnitude of your Evolutionary beliefs and origin, you wouldn't even embrace it. You were trained (or brainwashed) in public schools to accept Evolution and YOU WERE NEVER allowed to doubt it or be presented with other theories like the ones proposed by Believers (I.D. Creationism, etc) You're just a trained ape!
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad I was a Christian until I was age 17. I attended private christian schools, prayed daily, went to sunday school, and attended church weekly. when I read about talking snakes, men living in whales, ever animal in the world on a boat, read into thousands of contradictory statements, and when I opened my mind to reality I saw the bible for what it was. Bullshit. Plain and simple. God killed, 2,476,636+ people in the bible, Satan, 10. Satan seems like a nice guy in reality :)
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Once again you mention talking snakes but I remind other viewers to go back a few comments & read what I answered this Atheist with respect to that. The "men living in whales" that you mention and try to portray as an impossible is nothing more than a feeble attempt to refute an event that could very well be plausible. The whale swallowed a man that was too big to digest & was thrown up close to shore. There have been cases of sea animals trying to eat humans that survive such events.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija You try to ridicule the Noah event saying all world species cannot fit in the Ark. This shows to me that you lack understanding of mathemathics and numbers in general. There is a mathematical formula that defines population growth for humans and one can be developed to describe the same for animals. I have mathematically proven that 8 people can produce 6 billions humans during the time between Noah and present. The same can be proven correct with animal species.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija You also mention God killing a huge amount of people but Satan killing only a few and thus making YHVH more evil than Satan. What you don't seem to understand here is that such numbers prove one is God and the other isn't. You also seem to mistakenly confuse physical life with spiritual life. Satan didn't kill as many people as God did because he can't but he surely led them to hell or eternal separation from God. In reality Satan was the one that proved to be our true enemy, not God.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija In the Bible God is a Judge and a just one. He punished people that went astray and were deceived by Satan and filled Earth with violence and sin like the Bible says. If we have a judge that condemns a serial killer to the electric chair, are we to blame the judge for killing a man or blame the man that took so many innocent lives? The judge did his job and took the right decision to remove evil from society. God is also a Judge but in a grand scale judging the masses.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad Scientists study evolution and what has happened over the billions of years. We can understand what a billion years mean (well us none religious people since we are better with numbers, you Christians like small numbers which is why you think the earth is 6,000 years old) but we can't fathom what its like to live and experience the billions of years. Testing and looking through space shows it, that or Zeus did all. I mean the Greeks did say Zeus did it, why not believe them?
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Again more strawman arguments. In your comment you start a psychological game trying to create groups (we and "you" Christians) and at the same time you try to place science in the Atheist side while trying to place Christians as far away from it as you can. Who do you think you're fooling here Mr. Atheist? Certainly not me.
Science as you know it today was discovered and developed BY CHRISTIANS. Study some history and learn something. There are more scientist BELIEVERS than Atheists.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad Yes, developed hundreds of years ago by christian scientists, because if you weren't a christian in their society you'd have your head cut off ;)... funny how that worked! Accept us or else!.... we kill you! Like Copernicus, he lived in the 15th century and made the first major developments into cosmology.
The statement about more scientist believers has zero relevance. Millions of Germans though killing Jews was right, doesn't make them correct does it?
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Another strawman argument. You are inventing an event in history that is false by saying that Christians beheaded Atheists for not believing. That's simply a lie. If the Church killed Atheists like you said, then for what excuse did the Church kill Protestant Christians? Kaboom....
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija The event in history that you refer to is the Inquisition and Vatican killed ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE for not believing in their Pope, not because of rejection of God or Christ. Atheists have always existed even before Christianity and scientists were never required to be Christian in the past. Its just that Atheists were a bunch of ignorant people in the past, incapable of developing science, as much as they are in the present.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija Copernicus was a scientist and scholar. He was a Frauenberg Cathedral canon and some claim he even became a priest. He always showed his interest in religion and God and nobody forced him to become involved with the Church of his time. Stop inventing your own history. Gosh, your ignorance is annoying!
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad The fact that your god still kills people is not moral, and I am superior because I know killing is wrong. The fact that you would worship a being who is so cruel is disturbing. I was making a point about Capurnicous, is he lived in a society where he had no choice what to believe, either be Christian and study science, or die (I am sure you Christians would love this for present time, but now you just excommunicate people). You keep saying atheists have done nothing for science.
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Again more strawman arguments that NEED to be refuted. You want to classify "killing" as a 100% immoral act by force and based on that WRONG assumption, you take from there to "judge" God. Let me help your brain make use of logic to correct your WRONG assumption. If you are having a picnic with your wife and kids in the park and a man approaches your family with a gun saying he will rape your wife in front of your kids and if anyone resists, he will kill them all...
continues...
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija There is no help around. In certain moment the man gets distracted for a few seconds. This is your chance to do one of few choices: a) you can try to reason with the man but risk your family to be killed if the man is insane, b) you can start to run & save your own life but let your family be slaughtered or, c) you have a gun hidden and attached to your ankle which you can pull off, kill the man, save yourself and save your family. Which choice makes you "evil" and which one is right?
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija Or let's say you are working for an organization to help victims of war in a war-ridden country. You give refuge to 100 people and the next day a militant looking for survivors from place to place happens to enter the building of your organization, He sees the refugees there and heads to the exit to notify his superiors to send a death squad to kill them all there. But you have the chance to kill him before he exits the door and save the 100 people and move them to a safer place.
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija If you know that once the militant goes out, you'll have no time to move so many people to a new place and they will surely be slaughtered, would it be "evil" to kill him and save 100 people or wouldn't it be more evil to let the 100 people be slaughtered and then you and those at the organization once they accuse you of being a "traitor"?
There are so many situations that justify "killing" that to say "killing" is wrong is a little too naive of you to say. Your argument is flawed.
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija In fact, it would be immoral of you to try to prevent a serial killer from being executed that killed your mother, sister, and 10 more girls in your neighborhood and then allow him to spend the rest of his life in prison leeching the tax payers' money, and writing books glorifying and reliving the atrocities he perpetrated and selling that book from jail while he laughs his ass off at the victims and families while they suffer every single day of the rest of their lives for their loss.
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija In reality you still have nothing valid against God. You don't know or understand God's Judgement upon humanity. Like a judge that sends a murderer to the electric chair and the judge is not to be blamed for murder, the Creator is much more justified to pass His Judgment on evil generations that only do evil 24 hours a day, all days of their lives without repentance. You, as an Atheist, are in no position to judge God since your moral values are subjective and not objective like mine.
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@MoooHamMad It's really sad you have become so brainwashed into your religion. Science has already done more for the human race than any religion ever will do. I can only hope you never reproduce to brainwash your children into this cult.
And I was right, you won't even read the few passages I referenced. You will never read your whole holy book. Sad how I have and I dont even believe it ;)
The whole beheading people was done with a guillotine.
You are to thick to even read your book, I am done.
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Again, another strawman argument, You try in vain to create 2 fictional groups or categories and then put science in one side at the same time you pretend it's mutually exclusive to the other. By creating this false perception, you auto-destroyed your own argument.
Religion is not an enemy of science and the CREATORS of that science you mention were RELIGIOUS people themselves. Like Einstein said once: "Science without Religion Is Lame, Religion without Science Is Blind".
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija I see you like to repeat your arguments over and over again even when already addressed. So, to follow your own game, let me "repeat" my previous response to you. If an Atheist was beheaded in the guillotine for not believing, then what reason were Protestant Christians beheaded for? The logical fallacy of your argument lies in the fact that both, Believers and non-Believers were victims of the Vatican and you try once again to create 2 fictional enemy groups: Christians vs. Atheists.
MoooHamMad 19 hours ago
@pogibija It's strange how you pick and choose what to believe from the Greeks. You mock their belief in Zeus but blindly accept Evolution that was inspired by those same Greeks. They presented philosophical ideas of men coming from fish which is similar to modern Evolutionary ideas. The Greek Anaximander was the first person in history 2600 years ago to state in a poem called "On Nature" that man came from fish. These Greeks weren't scientists but philosophers.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@pogibija What you don't seem to realize is that for these Greeks, it was as valid to believe in Zeus as it was to believe that man came from fish. While you laugh at Zeus but take the man coming from fish seriously, I laugh at Zeus, at man coming from fish and at Atheists like you.
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad Being an atheist has nothing to do with voting down a video, I vote down bullshit. "CONTEXT". So how do you know Jesus was not context? Or noahs ark, the rising of jesus after 3 days, adam and eve, etc.? You Christians are all the same, whatever you know couldn't be true or don't want to believe is true you'll just say its out of context.
Corinthians 14:34 "women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says."
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija And this is what I expected from you. Its always the same with Atheists. Instead of addressing my arguments and intelligently try to refute them, you have to recur to ad-hominem attacks and cheap accusations. I'm not twisting any Scriptures to fit anything, I offered you a perfectly honest and plausible explanation of its context. Instead of accusing me, simply explain what part of what I said is ILLOGICAL to you. Go ahead, don't worry too much about your ego being hurt.Prove me wrong!
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad Ego hurt, illogical? I am not hurt in anyways haha don't be so proud :)
YOU are twisting your own scriptures, they say a talking snake. YOU said it literally didn't mean that, yet it said it. Just like it says killing women, killing people, owning slaves, people coming back from the grave, people living in fish. YOUR holy book says that, I don't think it is true or even "metaphorically" true.
I adressed your "argument" of down rating the video, talking to animals and context.
pogibija 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad You are the one here jumping to say I didn't adress anything, and then throwing insult towards me isn't very Christian like ;) you should be spreading the good word.
WHICH part was illogical was saying it is about context. The book says there is a talking snake, and no where does it say its metaphorically, it literally means a talking snake.
pogibija 1 day ago
@pogibija Again, the context in the Bible is what defines its meaning. Yes, Song of Songs mentions a word similar to MUHAMMAD. Does that mean Muhammad was prophesied in that book? No. Muhammad means praised one but Song of Songs is not mentioning any man called Muhammad but a woman in love telling her lover he is the praised one to her. And to go even further, the lovers are symbolic of the relationship between God (the man) and Israel (the woman). That's how Bible works. You are too naive...
MoooHamMad 1 day ago
@MoooHamMad You aren't even addressing my points about the few bible quotes I mentioned, I BET you won't ever even read them. Thats what I did though, so I don't blame you. I was scared as well to challenge my faith, to question everything I was told. But When I did, I could see all the flaws in Christianity. We don't want to read the passages about god killing, hating gays, burning a million people, allowing rape and torture. You'll just say "you read it out of context". Yet you still believe
pogibija 1 day ago
"Ratings have been disabled for this video"
Wankers
BillyIsATwat23 1 week ago
This is sad. I really feel bad for these people. You can keep searching for evidence to support your fairy tale doctrine..but I promise, you won't find any. Just accept the fact that evolution is true. There is NO debate. In order to accept creation, you honestly have to close your eyes and ignore every single discovery science has made. If you use that logic, why do you allow yourself to be treated w/ modern medicine? It is the same thing. The same scientific advancements conclude medince&evolu
mcrAtheist 1 week ago
@mcrAtheist The scientists you speak so much about it happen to be a majority Christians and Jews. The scientific theories and principles you speak so much about it happen to be discovered in the past and present by Bible believing people. Don't make me post their names, dates, kind of scientific breakthrough, etc, because you're gonna lose. Medicine doesn't depend on any kind of grand scale Evolution. That's simply a lie! Evolution is a Greek fairy tale and Atheists are deluded, TY!
MoooHamMad 1 week ago
Many so called clever teachers also believe the false holocaust story is true, just because the Jewish controlled media told them, kind of reminds me of the ridiculous evolution story.
ytambienroger 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoooHamMad Even the Catholic church accepts evolution, with the addition that it was a process designed and guided by God.
MrSitemaster2 2 weeks ago
Lame same old misunderstandings, arguments from ignorance, and logical fallacies presented as if they were facts.
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
I see ratings have been disabled for this video.
Just a demonstration of the level of confidence he has in his superstitious ideas.
HonestMan395 1 month ago
@HonestMan395 probably because the majority of youtube is filled with a bunch of idiots who believe in evolution and they would thumbs it down simply because they don't agree with him and are ignoring the facts brought up in the video.
Pajanimalz 1 month ago
@Pajanimalz Facts about creationism? What facts?
I've asked this of a number of creationists and, so far, none have had an answer:
"There've been over 240,000 peer reviewed publications confirming the accuracy of Evolution.
There's not even been one publication trying to prove creationism that has even been submitted for peer-review. Why?"
Creationists know that if subjected to the rigours of peer review, their arguments collapse in a heap and they want to avoid that embarrassment.
HonestMan395 1 month ago
@HonestMan395 yeah they are cowards who hide behind their fairytale faith they are pathetic acting like spoiled kids.
noeszigi 1 week ago
You're a fool if you don't believe in God, says the Bible itself
bltX777 2 months ago
@bltX777 True, Atheists are called FOOLS in the Bible. I always say they have a holiday: April Fools' Day though I prefer to call them BABOONS. They hate it because they insist they are great apes and baboons aren't. Lol, it's like telling a kid that thinks he is like Batman, "No kid, you aren't Batman, you're more like Robin, ROFLMAO!"
MoooHamMad 1 month ago
If evolution is true. We mind as well believe, random hammer smacks to a 1953 Corvette. (mutations) Followed by seeing if that new modified model sells, (selection). Will eventually give us a 2012 Corvette! You got to really dumb yourself down to believe that.
Howie47 2 months ago
Whats this about life beginning with an asteroid collision which produced primitive bacteria? Did you just make that up?
I make a point with these kind of vids to give up when I hear total fucking nonsense which has just been pulled out of someone's arse.
revjimbob 2 months ago
Paleontologist Robert Carroll In his book 'vertebrate paleontology and evolution' says that we have no intermediate fossils between rhipidisitian fish and early amphibians. (the theory of land animals evolving from fish). Wake up smell coffee, leading palaeontologist knows evolution is bull shit but still feeds it to you bottom feeders
Dogshite187 2 months ago 2
@Dogshite187 we didn't find it THEREFORE GOD DID IT, classic...
ppsp3 2 months ago
@ppsp3 Nature has no intelligence nor is an entity but somehow "random" mutations followed by "natural" selection did it, classic! ...And you can't see what's wrong with that picture? What a moron!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad You're the moron if you think that there is a God
ppsp3 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad your comment demonstrates that you have absolutely no understanding of how evolution by Natural selection works.
Have you actually read "On the Origin of Species", or in fact any serious book on evolution, or do you just get all your information from You-tube videos and apolgetics websites?
HonestMan395 1 month ago
liberals believe the dumbest crap!
sjdss 2 months ago
Why don't you and the rest of your creatard fuckholes do the world a favor and just kill yourselves!?! With all of the misinformation and blatant lies you spread, I don't understand how you can look at yourselves in the mirror and claim the superiority you do with your fairy tales. Fuck you I hope you slide under a truck and taste your own blood! Piece of shit creatard douche! I'm sorry I shouldn't call you a douche, that at least, serves a purpose!
mikestash 4 months ago
@MoooHamMad Why do you assume I believe anything before I've informed you?
ShawnsterVideos 4 months ago
Please click Video Statistics icon and you can see 163 DISLIKES and only 68 LIKES.
Posters who remove the ability to Rate are cowards who fear viewers' freedom of expression.
ShawnsterVideos 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ShawnsterVideos Yes, I fear radical/extremist religious Atheists using vote-bots to hijack whatever videos don't agree with their religious views of the universe and life. But to be fair, I have allowed comments in all my videos so baboons like you can spew their hatred and show the world to what extremes Atheists are willing to go to silence any opposition; like they did during the 20th century when they tortured and massacred more than 300 million God-loving innocent victims around the world.
MoooHamMad 4 months ago
@MoooHamMad Regarding your statement "baboons like you" : that is YOUR hate speech about a stranger. I made no such derogatory comment about you.
Each time you call people who could be your friends "baboons", the more you do work for the atheists. Thanks.
ShawnsterVideos 4 months ago
@ShawnsterVideos Oh, I'm sorry for calling you baboon, I forgot that you believe you are a "great ape", my mistake Mr. Ape...
MoooHamMad 4 months ago
As for Claim #2: You omitted "Some traits are easy to evolve — formed by many different combinations of mutations. Others are hard to evolve — made from an unlikely genetic recipe. Evolution gives us the easy ones, even when they are not the best." (ts-si . org / biology / 3357-natural-selection-may-produce-the-best-fit-but-not-the-best-organisms
"God loving people that believe and embrace freedom and democracy" That is a contradiction in terms.
TomFynn 5 months ago
@TomFynn There are no contradictions when I say: "God loving people that believe and embrace freedom and democracy" unless your logic runs along the lines of "To embrace freedom and democracy, you need to be Atheist" which would be the only logical opposite of what I said. Or is it that you really have nothing to say to defend your religion of Evolution and you have to go off the tangent to avoid people from addressing the real issue here: the Masonic myth of Evolution? Hmmm...
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoooHamMad In a democracy your first duty is to the democratic process. To other people. In religion, your first duty is to god. There is a contradiction.
"religion of Evolution" LOL, ROFL. LMAO. Do at least try to inform yourself:
"The Greatest Show on Earth" by Richard Dawkins
"Your inner fish" by Neil Shubin
"What Evolution Is" von Ernst Mayr
"Why Evolution is true" by Jerry Coyne
"Darwins Dangerous Idea" by Daniel Dennett
TomFynn 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad please go to my website feandft.com and checkout my friend 777gslinger's vids he proves the existence of the creator. bye take care.
TheLovesoul1 4 months ago
@TheLovesoul1 hahaha he proves it? really? i doubt it. Look at thunderf00t his video series "why do people laugh at creationists" He probably debunks all of your bullshit
alliencedful 3 months ago
one word for you , motherfucker : MUDSKIPPER !
robytzu97 5 months ago
@robytzu97 Oh yeah, the Great Designer YHVH had such great original ideas during Creation that He came up with creative designs such as the mudskipper. By the way, you don't have to use foul language and behave like a baboon just because you disagree with me; that makes you look as radical as Muslim extremists. By the way, Evolution was created by Masons (Erasmus Darwin revived old Greek philosophy) & Charles made it into a "theory" to perpetuate illuminism (Luciferianism). Read comments below.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago 2
@MoooHamMad ....they created evolution ? did you really just say that ? i'm not gonna argue anymore..i've lost all my hope for humanity after hearing that ....
robytzu97 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad your assumptions about cranial capacity... sigh. You can't label the fosiles as fully ape or fully human as "ape" and "human" are just words. i could call a cat fully dog that wouldn't change what it is. And the part about the chromosomes, damn you are so fucking stupid. And stop using the word "faith" and "evolution" in the same sentence as science has to be proven and verified, while a religion runs on faith on some ancient books written by some desert people.
alliencedful 3 months ago
@alliencedful You say: "stop using the word "faith" and "evolution" in the same sentence as science has to be proven and verified". Good one because that statement is exactly what makes Evolution a religion. No one can prove we came from ape-like ancestors nor can it be verified. Only speculation is produced. Evolution originates from Greek philosophy and Erasmus Darwin (Darwin's grandfather) used it to produce the first basic principles of Evolution. Greeks were not scientists...
MoooHamMad 3 months ago
@alliencedful The very same Greeks that first started inventing myths and schools of thought where they imagined all kinds of apes transforming into humans are the very same idiots that propagated a multitude of gods and fables. This is what you got now: Greek fables promoted by the Darwin family and a bunch of fools that hijacked science to discreetly promote the myth of Evolution by disguising it and protecting it under the shadow of science. A faith... A religion...
MoooHamMad 3 months ago
@MoooHamMad And lol did you just indirectly state darwin was a greek supremacist? really? How fucking hilarious. Evolution comes from greek philosophy. No it means darwin was thinking about the evolution of life in a philosophycal way, and philosophy was invented by the greeks thousands of years before that. SO you state it's based on greek philosophy. How do you come up with this hahaha.
alliencedful 3 months ago
@MoooHamMad Ok "bro", you can't accept micro evolution and not accept macro evolution.
Macro evolutuion IS a SUM of micro evolutions. Unlike the ridiculous statements in the vid where a dog changes into a dolphin? No sir that's not how it happens. It happens with lots of mciro evolutions over a long period of time. SO you're logicly inconsistent.
As i'm trying not to get mad at the immense stupidiy displayed on this vid i have to say this is some good comedy.
alliencedful 3 months ago
@alliencedful You said: "It happens with lots of mciro evolutions over a long period of time."
Mooo: This is the part where it turns into a fable, a myth, a delusion. To claim lots of micro-evolution processes over a long period of time simply is A STATEMENT OF FAITH. You cannot possibly prove such thing happened. You getting mad or not over this is to me as "meaningless as two goats butting heads".
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad It has been proven, look at the fossil record.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz You said: "It has been proven, look at the fossil record."
Mooo: In a letter written by former Aerospace Engineer Luther Sunderland, he asked senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, Colin Patterson, who has 7 million fossils in his museum, why he never included even one photo in his book of the transitional fossils he claimed exist. Dr. Patterson answered back in shame with these words:
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@gregrutz (continues...)
"I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I certainly would have included them...I will lay it on the line, There is not one such fossil for which one might make a watertight argument."
Is that enough to make you THINK or do you prefer our secular Atheistic government and society to keep brainwashing you with Greek myths? Think, THINK, THIIIIIIIINK!!!!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Species that possess transitional features: Epidexipteryx hui, Protoavis, Protarchaeopteryx, Archeopteryx, Avimimus, Sinosauropteryx, Caudipteryx, Rahonavis, Shuvuuia, Sinornithosaurus, Beipiasaurus, Microraptor, Nomingia, Tiktaalik, Epidendrosaurus, Cryptovolans, Scansoriopteryx, Yixianosaurus, Dilong, Pedopenna, Jinfengopteryx, Sinocalliopteryx, Sinornis, Ambiortus, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis
Most fossils are transitional, they are all extinct. these just show half and half forms.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Your word plays and sophism do not change facts, and the facts are evolution exists, the idea of a magical beign who can conjure things out of nothing is laughable, and your faith is an illusion. All you religious people do is try to come up with ways to phrase your arguments as to keep the discussion going, but in the facts department you have lost before the battle even started.
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful So many words, and yet such an empty argument. Nature IS NOT smart or intelligent since it has no mind of its own. Natural selection is nothing more than a delusion part of the Evolution scam. Nature works because it was programmed (like software). Functional creatures like plants & animals possessing a complex DNA map that defines each creature is more than proof of the existence of a God. Randomness cannot possibly produce millions of perfectly functional organisms.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@alliencedful You see, the ones that live in delusion are not me or any other believer of God but Atheists like yourself and Evolution-believing Catholics. Physical evidence studied through science shows traces of design and thus, of God but the idea is shunned by many scientists in their eagerness to keep mandatory secularism and this way violating the most sacred rule of science: IMPARTIALITY TOWARDS THE EVIDENCE. Science has been hijacked by the Greek myth of Evolution.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Show me this "proof of design", because if the idea is shunned by REAL scientists, and still a normal youtuber as yourself has seen this evidence, it can not be that hard to link me to some real evidence is there?
Let's do a hypothesis here, let's say there were traces of design, why is that proof of a god? See that's the kind of things scientists don't do. they don't derive things without there beign a real connection. science vs sophism, you are a sophist. :)
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful The only scientists that shun the proof of design are those that embrace the Greek myth of Evolution promoted by the Masons of the Darwin family. Fortunately, many scientists still keep their brains and logic functioning and reject this Greek philosophy.
Why are traces of design proof of God? A design requires INTELLIGENCE for the idea being developed to work properly and inevitably implies a "GOD". The reason for so many religions is to try to decipher "HIM".
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad that's why so manny species have gone extinct. You know when a baby gets born and has an extra arm attacked to it's forehead? evolution created an imperfect beign. Mutations are not "perfect" they are almost always imperfect, and only the ones that are beneficial survive. This is BASIC SHIT. And nature was programmed? right. why don't we debate the likelyhood of a god. Explain to me if god created the universe, what created god? You're so full of shit my friend.
alliencedful 2 months ago
@alliencedful "evolution created an imperfect beign"
Mooo: "Created". Good to hear you sound more and more like the religious person that you really are. Evolution "creates"....and that's your faith right there. Your god.
There are no mutations that are beneficial. All mutations are harmful. Mutations are the reason for diseases, syndromes, YOU getting old, etc.
God has no creator. He's an intelligent spirit that was always there.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Yeah semantics don't really count as an argument, as in my mother language i would have used a more suiting word. and TBH you are spinning in circles. read my comments again if you want i'm not repeating them
Sophism, look it up
alliencedful 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Yes, evolution was even obvious to the Greeks. Darwin discovered how it happens.
DNA Proves it, No faith needed.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz Greeks weren't scientists but philosophers & polytheists. Charles Darwin discovered nothing. All he did was promote his grandfather's ideas about his studies from ancient Greek philosophers like Anaximander who 1st stated in a poem called "On Nature", 2600 years ago that man came from fish. His student Xenophanes concluded that Earth was underwater by looking at sea shell fossils on land (the flood?). The poem also inspired Aristotle who references it in his teachings.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@gregrutz DNA proves nothing related to "macro" Evolution. DNA only shows a map of genetic information contained within an acid found in the body that contains within it a carefully designed structure that gives morphological and biological shape to the creature or organism from which it was extracted. If we are to judge by the DNA, it serves more as proof to the existence of a God than proving the Evolution Hoax. In conclusion, you were fed at school a myth disguised as science.
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad Right, Darwin is not know for anything. He wrote a book called 'Greek philosophers knew the water was higher or the land was lower.'' So Darwin proved the land was lower, proving Plate Tectonic.
If Creatards can make up crap to support their religious myths why can't I make up stories?
Floods make mud that kilsl fish and shells so they don't grow on mountain tops. IDiot.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz You said: "Floods make mud that kill fish and shells so they don't grow on mountain tops. IDiot."
Mooo: Good that you admit that a flood creates mud that would kill fishes and shells because that is exactly how shells were found atop Mount Everest: CLOSED SHELLS. When animals like oysters die, they OPEN their shells to take last oxygen. So, why are millions of shell fossils closed on top of Mt. Everest? Use your head to think, THINK, THINK, THIIIIIIIIIIINK...!!!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@gregrutz Millions of fossilized oysters have been found around the world and in Mount Everest in a closed-position suggesting a RAPID BURIAL as in mud from a global flood. That is TRUE logic, and logic is anathema to Evolution. While not all planet would have turned into mud after The Flood, some fish species survived in pockets of water at high sea levels where solids couldn't possibly float permanently. There wasn't mud everywhere as you suggest. Now you're left with just a myth!
MoooHamMad 2 months ago
@MoooHamMad No it's not speculation there is tons of evidence for it. The only reason why it's called a theory is because scientists are consistent with their categorisation of knowledge. We cannot make a species evolve into a lab, so we can never say we're 100% true. Offcourse those who cling to religious dogma grab this infinite small chance darwin was wrong and turn it around and try to push a gigantic dogma in your face. That of a mythical magical creature who bears no explanatio
alliencedful 3 months ago
i can see where a hummingbird was once a t rex and einstein ancestors were monkeys, it is all coming together now
leonetski 5 months ago
HUMANS ARE STILL CORDATES
HUMANS ARE STILL MAMMALS
HUMANS ARE STILL PRIMATES
HUMANS ARE STILL APES
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz When Erasmus Darwin became a 33rd degree Mason, he was required to create a dogma that portray Illuminism (a.k.a. Luciferianism). The illuminated (high-degree Masons) believe that man is changing spiritually, socially, intellectually and physically to eventually become an illuminated being under Lucifer's guidance who will bring humans out of YHVH's darkness. A 33rd degree Mason shows this transformation through dogmas injected into society. Erasmus Darwin did it with Evolution ideas.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@gregrutz This is why Evolution places the origin of man to that of an ape-like creature: to reflect the slow transformation of man into a being of light (illuminated under Lucifer). You cannot be something great and full of knowledge and wisdom if you were not first a lowly primitive creature. Evolution serves perfectly to portray this transformation. Another 33rd degree Mason was Joseph Smith who also created a dogma to portray Illuminism: Mormonism.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@gregrutz In Mormonism we start as humans and eventually become gods in the afterlife with our own planets and creatures to rule. This way Mormonism (like Evolution) also shows a slow transformation for humans to eventually become "illuminated"; in this case into "gods". This was Joseph Smith's final test to be accepted in his Lodge as 33rd degree Mason. Like Mormonism, Evolution is nothing more than Masonic dogma and fools like you ended up believing the lie and sadly some Christians fell, too.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad Mormans believe in God and Jesus, that makes it a religion.
Biology is a Science, it is based on evidence. Science does not use magic, voodoo or gods.
Yes, Evolution was evident to Greeks or anyone who looks at it.
Darwin discovered what makes it work, something you and all creationists don't understand.
gregrutz 5 months ago
Creationists just keep getting dumber. This video is really screwed up, the person who made it must have been home schooled.
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz Nice ad-hominem attack. As expected from an Atheist baboon.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad I am not an Atheist, Mr. Great Ape.
1. Abiogenesis did not start because an asteroide hit the earth when it was forming.
2. ''completely based on assumptions, faith and...'' WHAT? SCIENCE is no pseudo-science dummy.
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz If you're not an Atheist, you certainly make a good candidate to be one since you've already the basic religious belief that becomes nowadays a necessary trait of Atheism: Evolution. I'll make a video soon about the true origins of Evolution. In it I'll show how this myth originated from Greek philosophers many centuries ago and then the idea was borrowed by Freemasons like Erasmus Darwin (Charles Darwin's grandfather) to indirectly advance the path of Luciferianism through Evolution.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad ''you've already the basic religious belief''
Sorry dummy I am not religious. If I was an Atheist I still would not be religious.
Is GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GDO GDO GOD GOD GOD GDO GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD ALL YOU CAN TALK ABOUT?
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz To address your point #1, Abiogenesis makes use of 2 hypothesis to explain the origin & first formations of life on the planet. One is called Panspermia & the other is Exogenesis. Both deal with the idea that a possible asteroid hit the Earth millions of years ago to provide either already formed bacteria in other parts of the universe that were seeded on Earth after the impact or organic molecules that reacting with our atmosphere produced the first living organisms. So, you're wrong!
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad Abiogenesis is about how life started from organic molecules. Biologists don't care where the 'soup' came from. Scientists think most of the water on the earth came for comets and outer space, so what?
gregrutz 5 months ago
@gregrutz To address your point #2, indeed Science is not pseudo-science but Evolution IS pseudo-science meaning that is not science. That was my point that your deluded mind wasn't able to grasp. Evolution is a philosophy started by Greeks about the origins of life that later Charles Darwin's grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) used as a mean to advance his Masonic agenda and the path to Luciferianism. I'll explain shortly what I mean.
MoooHamMad 5 months ago
@MoooHamMad ''Evolution is a philosophy '' NO, Social Darwinism is a philosophy.
Evoution is a PROCESS, a fact. There is a Theory of Evolution to show how it happens.
gregrutz 5 months ago
Is this satire?
buttface112211 5 months ago
I AM atheist. BUT, irrespective to what you say above, I am not marxist, nor do I hate, or any other of what you say. But you want to take up arms and prepare for war? Take a really hard look at yourself. I am am very kind, loving person, a firefighter actually.who happens to study science and lives in the Bible Belt. So PLEASE, stop making a bad name for us Atheists! By all means, go worship your god... But do it without applying so much hate towards others who wish to think differently
energizer205 5 months ago
no thumb up or down, now why would that be. also like to add, some lunitic has escaped from the asylum. this video is a deperate piece of fishing. ooooh the controversy. FACEPALM.
kram83au 6 months ago
**Two: "ur full of shit". English may not be my primary language but I certainly know how to spell better than you do. You meant to say: "You're full of shit"**
Let me help you out with your English. When he says "ur full of shit", he's typing "ur" instead of "you're" to save time typing. It's kind of like slang, if you know what that is. So when you say "You meant to say..", you're only right in the sense that it's the exact same thing as what he said(not typed). You're intellect is a joke.
urantivirus 6 months ago
yes! biology is a hoax!
also, if you didnt know:
cosmology is trying to steal your car!
OmfgItsHenu 6 months ago
Evolution has nothing to do with the 'origin of life', that's abiogenesis. Evolution shows how life develops once life exists. You know fuck all on this subject - do something with your life that you actually possess a talent or knowledge in.
SecularSamurai 6 months ago
Comment removed
JFJjBoy 6 months ago
It's obvious that only an obtus person would presume to condescend to others that don't cocur with the mass delusion of Thoery based Sceinces.
The FACT still remains that there is NO proof to validate this grand deceptive 3 card monty called Evolution.
If Sceince has been reduced to THEORIES, then that isn't Science, that's Conjecture and Speculations of far gone bizzare connections with Relativity.
Theorists always resort to anger in order to cloud reason, foolishness.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
It's so obvious that anyone against evolution for a preferred creation ideal is a pure biased arrogant person who could care less about the facts. You began accepting your religion and then looked for anything to support it, no matter how irrational or far fetched. Don't even tell me that you do care about facts if you believe in creation, because intelligent design and creationism do not offer evidence to support it of any kind and thus deserve no place in scientific teachings.
pat5168 6 months ago
You have to have common sense and a reasonable mind in order to understand all the FACTS you pointed out. However, many don't seem to understand that Evolution is merely a THEORY+Speculation+Presumptions (that all) =Nonsense.
Just because presumptuous scientists POSTULATE on how things came to be, doesn't mean that they are credible. That's the problem with people, they've been brainwashed with false theory based sciences that they reject common sense and reason. Their PHD is in confabulation
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
@terrymorse- Why do people like yourself always project Evolution as if it's a FACT?
NOT EVEN SCIENTISTS DO THAT, the common concurrence among TRUE sceintistsis that Evolution is a THEORY.......let me repeat that.........the common concurrence among TRUE scientists is that Evolution is a THEORY NOT A FACT.
So where are all you guys getting this idea that the discussion is over and that THEORY has taken the place of FACT? Seriously, you people need to read alot more than just propaganda.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite Evidence supports the modern evolutionary synthesis, the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Evolutionary biologists document the fact of common descent: making testable predictions, testing hypotheses, and developing theories that illustrate and describe its causes. So if none of those things prove that its a fact, you should see a therapist for you obviously imagine anything against your views is propaganda when what you read was very biased
pat5168 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite Evidence of common descent of living things has been discovered by scientists working in a variety of fields over many years. This evidence has demonstrated and verified the occurrence of evolution and provided a wealth of information on the natural processes by which the variety and diversity of life on Earth developed. How much do you understand about evolution? Do facts mean nothing to you if you don't want them to? They are so obviously credible, you can actually observe it.
pat5168 6 months ago
@pat5168- So basically you base your belief on these main words that you've used within your own statements:
Theory, Predictions (a presumption of possibilities), Hypotheses (self confessed educated GUESSES), More Theories-
& by these a rational person is to conclude that this translates into FACT?
I would suggest you continue with your presumptions, calculations of mass guess work formed at the feet of conjured and fabricated Theories that can only lead to more questions than it anwers.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite You obviously have no interest in learning of evolution so I won't explain, live in ignorance for all I care because you won't even care to recognize how much evidence and proof there actually is supporting evolution that creationism could only dream of. Sadly, I think you care more about what helps you sleep at night rather than evidence that you don't like what it supports.
pat5168 6 months ago
@pat5168- I'm sorry you got upset because you weren't able to convince me of the PROFOUND understandings of THEORY based science.
I care about FACTS, and you only futher validate that there are NO facts to support the THEORY of Evolution.
As I stated in the prior comment that you replied to, Just because presumptuous scientists POSTULATE on how things came to be, doesn't mean that they are credible.
Being adamant about your position doesn't translate into Truth, relax and have a Coke.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite No evidence for evolution? I'll need to message you what I think about that 500 characters is way too little for me to fit it all in here.
pat5168 6 months ago
@pat5168- Look, I can appreciate your fortitude in your doctrine, However, I don't subscribe to such fanciful exploitation of matters that bare no true relavance to such conjectured theories. If you want to peddle your beliefs then you're basically wasting your time on me, I won't be converted into such concoctions.
Simply put, I put ALL MY POWER OF BELIEF IN something completely different then unproven FAULTY Scientific theories. I would think you'd respect my position as I respect yours.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite I have given you infallible proof that supports common descent, you waste my time with your blithering idiocy by not recognizing the facts.
95% of scientists support evolution, creationists like yourself tend to follow the strict and literal version of whatever religious text you follow, but even people who study those texts have accepted that it should not be taken at face value.
People who study biology, don't agree. People who study religious texts, don't agree with you also...
pat5168 6 months ago
@1Ephraimite-(I repeat) I can appreciate your fortitude in your doctrine, However, I don't subscribe to such fanciful exploitation of matters that bare no true relavance to such conjectured theories. If you want to peddle your beliefs then you're basically wasting your time on me, I won't be converted into such concoctions.
Simply put, I put ALL MY POWER OF BELIEF IN something completely different then unproven FAULTY Scientific THOERIES...........THEORIES..............THEORIES.
1Ephraimite 6 months ago
-Chimps have more chromosomes than people, therefore evolution is wrong
This signifies exactly what is wrong with people who are against evolution. They have no idea how to think from an evolutionary view. It's all wishy washy god did this and that rubbish.
TheBiddleMan 7 months ago 9
@TheBiddleMan They enter the argument with the predetermined assumption that God exists. Therefore, when they hear the information about evolution, they're automatically trying to find God within it. When they don't find Him there, they can only draw the conclusion that the information is wrong.
It's so easy to be irritated by them for this - I'm guilty of looking down at them myself - but really, it's not their fault they're so illogical. They're simply deluded and indoctrinated.
SeedsOfHatred 4 months ago
@TheBiddleMan they found the 34 chromosome in humans... do more research plz...
101jon101 2 months ago
All of the evidence against evolution in this video is based entirely on misconceptions and misunderstandings. I actually fell out of my chair laughing when I saw the dolphin, dog.... err, thing. Where did that come from!?
Oh, by the way, did anyone else here actually read the entire description? This guy is a total fucking nut-case! XD
KyleAndDougsRandomTV 7 months ago
@buffboynick "Humans stay humans, cats stay cats, Chimpanzees stay chimps (and have since they first appeared on Earth 2 MILLION years ago)"
Simply appeared? Like POOF! Or were they delivered by flying saucer?
"Will someone just sign for these friggin' chimps. I still have a tank of Andromedan Swamp Slime to drop off on Alpha Centuri and I've already missed my lunch break!"
Clearly speciation occurs. Simply denying it is not an argument, it's just a joke.
Terncote 7 months ago
@buffboynick "Evolution is as much "fact" as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy riding a blue unicorn on their way to visit the Easter Bunny. Directed Panspermia and Genetic Engineering by ET is what is FACT."
Buwahahahahaha! Can we play 'Pin the Irony on the Jackass'?
"There is ZERO proof for macroevolution (drastic speciation)"
That's is complete nonsense. Did you mean there is none you are capable of understanding, perhaps. Or that fits your world view?
Terncote 7 months ago
Also , Male pattern baldness is a conspiracy against good looking guys such as myself. The government is putting chemicals in my water system to make my hair fall out. I've been buying bottled water ever since I found this out, but my hair keeps falling out. This must mean that they know where and when I will be purchasing a bottle of water and they are contaminating it with more chemicals. Oh yea evolution is a hoax too.
MrBrational 7 months ago 2
@MrBrational You're so childish and your logic is awful, ROFLMAO!
MoooHamMad 7 months ago
@MoooHamMad No it's absolutely correct, you know how I know? It's prophesied in the bible, and how do I know the bible is correct? Because it's the word of God, and how do I know it's the word of God? Because it says so in the bible.
MrBrational 7 months ago
@MoooHamMad It's also prophesied in the Koran as well. Now , you will tell me no it isn't , but have you read the Arabic version? I doubt it , you have probably read an English translation which is different then the Arabic version. How do I know the Koran is correct? Because it's the word of Allah. And How do I know it's the word of Allah? Because it says so in the Koran.
MrBrational 7 months ago
@MoooHamMad No worse than yours, kid.
jjobie 6 months ago
Evolution is total BS but I've seen better videos.
There are even Agnostics and atheists that know evolution is pseudo-scientific garbage.
Macroevolution (Drastic speciation) is EASILY DISPROVEN
Darwinism is another dumb religion.
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick Evolution is a fact, and solid side.
C00lblkatheist 8 months ago
@C00lblkatheist
Evolution is as much "fact" as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy riding a blue unicorn on their way to visit the Easter Bunny.
Directed Panspermia and Genetic Engineering by ET is what is FACT.
There is ZERO proof for macroevolution (drastic speciation)
Humans stay humans, cats stay cats, Chimpanzees stay chimps (and have since they first appeared on Earth 2 MILLION years ago)
No shared ancestors exist. Type in "CHLCA" on Wikipedia and read.
You've been BRAINWASHED :)
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick I disagree. Most notably duw to the transitional fossils evolution is the best fitting theory to the assortment of life that exists and that has existed. However it is possible that evolution did not happen, but alas no theory which fully supports the evidence and our understanding of both geological time and genetic variation on earth exists.
I will be ready to accept your scientific theory, simply publish and go. Scientists love incredible knowledge.
Solensherre 7 months ago
@buffboynick "there is ZERO proof for macroevolution" => DUH, because it takes millions of years for such effect to be seen! Pretty much all speices are defined by mankind ~4000+ years ago, so this means to see macroevolution, you need a macroevolution that takes place <4000 years timespan, which is precisely IMPOSSIBLE as evolution itself states.
Casshyr 7 months ago
ewwww Gtfo please
tomyferland1234 9 months ago
one. i could not take u seriously with ur accent and slurred words, two ur full of shit, three im gonna live past 2012, just saying, and fuck ur god. if god was real so many innocent people would not have died this past month in tornados.
OHS73 9 months ago
@OHS73 ONE: "Not taking me seriously because of my accent and slurred words" is called a logical fallacy based on mutually exclusive argumentation. In case you have no idea what I just said, it basically resumes into this: one thing has nothing to do with the other.
The mere fact that you discarded an entire argument based on my accent and not the content of my words makes you a complete rude and ignorant moron and no more intelligent than a baboon. You basically auto-destroyed yourself...!
MoooHamMad 9 months ago
@OHS73 Two: "ur full of shit". English may not be my primary language but I certainly know how to spell better than you do. You meant to say: "You're full of shit". These words are simply irrelevant ad-hominem attacks used by Atheists like you, who are unable to confront an argument which logic and content is above their brutish intellectual limitations.
MoooHamMad 9 months ago
@OHS73 Three: "im gonna live past 2012"
And so do I (I hope). You tried in vain to associate me with that New Age bullcrap about the end of the world in 2012 but I got you. Nice failed strawman argument.
And finally, nature is a mechanism set in motion in this planet that self-adjusts all the time. God may use nature to accomplish certain goals but I believe that 99% of the time God allows the planet to work on its own. I really doubt that God tried to kill people with tornadoes. Grow a brain!
MoooHamMad 9 months ago
@MoooHamMad hmm. disabled ratings? fucking coward.
myco578 6 months ago
@MoooHamMad TO be honest, it's a cool accent.
Marinanor 7 months ago
I already started laughin when you claimed that it was ridiculous because it was based on 'Assumptions, faith and pseudo-science'....what is religion exactly? LOL
FubarHS 9 months ago