Seems to me, that Asia probably wouldn't be half the world pop, if the rest of the world would reproduce naturally, like how God designed. Why do you criticize Asia, for obeying God?
And it's rather absurd to suggest that a HUGE continent, can't somehow hold, many billions of people.
India has 3 people per 2 acres. Yet they grew by 200 million beyond their already-billion, during the last decade. Proves even mismanaged India can manage to grow much denser.
@pronatalist ...Yeaaaah ummm. It sounds to me like you're taking this video and its comments and commenters waaaay too seriously. Go get some fresh air then come back, mmk?
And why should I not take the pop issue controversy, seriously? Why should I stand back and do nothing, while liberals try to take away my rights to have children, and devalue human life? Besides, God called me to be a pro-life activist a few decades ago. Do you think the only way to do that, is to hold picket signs as some terrible abortion clinic?, although I have done that too.
It's good that We Got So Big So Fast. Better than having never lived at all.
@pronatalist Yeah you're insane and I hope you die before you get the chance to have children. Well given the chance that anyone would be stupid enough to be with you in the first place. And holding up picket signs isn't going to solve anything it usually makes thing worse.
the longer children stay in school, the fewer children they will have. Smaller families can provide more resources for each child, and entire nations benefit when they have fewer children to drain their limited, declining resources. So education is the key to humane population stabilization.
You do NOT have the right to destroy humanity by putting evil creeps NWO criminal elitists like tyrant Obama into power. What are you? An evil Nazi?
A colony on the moon? Do you really think we are ready to build spaceships with 6 feet of lead shielding to get through the Van Allen Belt? Yes, I am suggesting that we Americans probably faked the moon landings. What a liar country U.S. is. 9-11 was an inside job.
Lots of people don't like "birth control." Where's our choice?
Seems like the list of shoddy contraceptive methods, gets ever longer. They are all shoddy, because God did not design people to use "birth control," but to Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth, as God commanded clearly in Genesis. No wonder human pop growth is so hard to control. God promised Abraham "uncountable" descendents, liked to the dust, grains of sand of seashore, or stars of the sky for their multitude.
Where is the "no method" method, on that long list?
Theres just not comment space to write a full damn message. So ill sum it up. Leave other countries alone. Africa wants to have aids, let them have aids. Middle east wants to have fun splosion time with each other. Let them have fun splosion time with each other. WE cant take care of our own shit, Why should we stick our noses in everyone elses. The day i see America not got to war, is the day i will gladly puncture my eye sockets with a rusty spoon.
From what I hear, African AIDS came from the NWO vaccination campaign, as part of evil depop agenda. NWO creeps know that Negros are the tribe of Judah, and they want to murder the 12 tribes of Israel, which are now scattered all over the world.
Otherwise, sounds like you make a good point. If Africa and Middle East like to enjoy their pop "explosion," let them. More and more people would be glad to live, and by populating countries more densely, lots more world pop can fit.
Not long ago, family size was simply thought "uncontrollable."
Why do we have such a bewildering array of contraceptive "options?" It's because they are all SHODDY. God never designed the human body for use of "birth control" measures, and that's why they don't work so well. So what does rebellious man do? Come up with yet another shoddy experimental method?
I reject imposing pop "control" on people, also reject "birth control." Let people multiply freely, families grow big.
Are you saying that women who demand "birth control," deserve to have their bodies damaged, and deserve not to have children, for their selfishness?
Why are contraceptives, such a pagan idol in society now? Is that what happens when lies aren't challenged early enough? The entire society goes insane, with perhaps a few exceptions?
Was what Adolf Hitler did to destroy his country and the world, just totally outrageous? So how come so many people went along with him?
Actually, that's the answer. Stop crazed liberals from disparaging human life, and let human life spread freely like how God designed us to multiply. Even nature wants us multiplying, for in nature, life spreads into most every available niche.
If the world grew more pronatalist, if people would repent and shun the shoddy contraceptives, and tell truth about how contraceptives are crap, we'd ADAPT better.
If you are actually paying attention, this is not propaganda for any political side. It's just good food for thought. Who can argue with the notion that we have to be efficient and responsible with our resources? Great video, Adam!!!
FYI, the New Jerusalem description in the Bible, makes God's beautiful city, sound quite incomprehensibly enormous in size. Perhaps Judgement Day is not going to make the dent into human pop size, that you were hoping for. Although, "overpop" can never be against a concern, without the wicked politicians so messing up the world.
The natural increase of mankind, is not the problem. It's the greed and wickedness of liberals, politicians, nature worshiper liars.
Every person in the world , shoulder to shoulder, can fit in a place the size of LA. The only problem is resources. By the time we reach 10 billion, we should be a little more advanced in that aspect.
@itubeyoublah "7 Billion People: Everybody Relax!" was made by an anti-contraception religious group called PRI. They are not a scientific body and 58 national science acdemies disagree with them and their misleading videos. I suggest you look up the millennium ecosystem assessments five volumes of peer reviewed science showing how humans use ecosystem services faster than they can be replaced or replenished. Your logic is along the lines of "I haven't crashed yet, so I never ever will"?!
Most every year, out come the psychics, and the pundits, and the mad scientists with their theories, predicting either how the new year will be, or making predictions about "If we don't do X within Y short years, the world is doomed." Most all the predictions soon turn out to be wrong. The pop didn't crash and everybody starve, like Paul Ehrlich predicted in "The Pop Bomb" c1968. So ever greedy for money, he toned down his dire predictions a tad in"The Pop Explosion"
The liberal immoral potheads, had their Woodstock in the 1960s, and announced their "Free Love," their "the pill," and their new immoral hippie counter-culture, and what do we have to show for it? Less pop than we could have enjoyed. Rampant divorces and rampant abortions. Many women's bodies fertility damaged by abortions and contraceptives, families and now even society and countries falling apart, The Great Obama Depression, rampant job loss and home foreclosures.
Did I select Oct. 31, 2011, as 7 billion day? Was I the one who made 7 billion a PR stunt, an excuse for libs to come out of the woodwork, yet again, every time we supposedly add the next billion?
Do I have the big radio megaphone that npr has?
So why do you accuse me of "forcing" my views onto anybody? Who has to listen to me? I'm not on the radio dial, unless I call a talk show, wait half an hour in the queue, and then get selected to take my turn.
According to the evidence I just listed, it's the pop phobics who are forcing their views, because not only are they wrong, but they have the bigger megaphone, which is often at least partially paid for, by the taxpayers, the very people who would expect to keep their money, to support their own growing families.
Why are we robbed of our money, to subsidize the shoddy contraceptives, ObamaCare, and Big Pharma? Why does the NWO criminal elites debase OUR money?
For 2006, humanity's total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.4 planet Earths – in other words, humanity uses ecological services 1.4 times as fast as Earth can renew them.
War does not keep human pop "controlled." War makes "overpop" worse, for it destroys resources and economy upon which people depend, while at the same time, the stress encourages even more pop growth. During war, especially, it's PATRIOTIC to have babies. Babies help rebuild the country, and may provide future soldiers, or political clout to prevent losing to the enemy the next time, even if it's merely a political contest.
Human pop grows far faster, than wars kill people.
@pronatalist At last we see your true colours, you aren't interested in womens rights or childrens rights, you just want to breed others out of existence. You are a eugenicist.
Wars almost always result from conflicts over resources, especially in the last 50 years. If everyone had less kids we would have less wars. p.s. pronatalist openly supports the taliban, have a look at their past comments.
So I want to make women "baby factories?" Can't you think of any new bogus claims to make? If they are married, what's the guy who sticks around, doing? Isn't he working, to help pay the bills? These days, even fathers change diapers. So how is the woman the "baby factory," but the man gets off scot-free? How does the man feel, when he has a wife who wants a big family, and she's almost always seeming to be pregnant? How many women take advantage, and offload their work?
Okay, so did you just disprove your own religion of evolution, atheism, nature worship, overpop, or whatever religion you admit to? Don't tell me that people who rebel against God aren't "religious" when their claims aren't based upon actual science.
Yes, the majority of people are wrong, but religions overlap in their claims, so it's not quite so simple as you stated it.
What cue cards are you reading that "sky fairy" crap off of?
I said the obvious alternative to Nazi eugenics, is to let everybody reproduce. Now what have I said, inconsistent with that statement?
Eugenicists have racist claims, some people ought to be allowed to reproduce more so than others, and many "undesirable" classes of people should be "convinced" into using contraceptives.
I do not believe the human race can be "improved" in such a way, and I have long advocated natural "uncontrolled" fertility, large families worldwide
How can I possibly for for wanting to "breed others out of existence," when I said that sex should be natural, and that we should encourage more people to marry young, welcome a larger proportion of the already "huge" human race to become sexually active, and allow babies to happen naturally without use of any means of "birth control?" Who is my group that aims to breed others out of existence,when I said I urge large families WORLDWIDE? That's ALL groups welcome to grow
@pronatalist " During war, especially, it's PATRIOTIC to have babies. Babies help rebuild the country, and may provide future soldiers, or political clout to prevent losing to the enemy the next time" quote from pronatalist. He clearly isn't interested in womens rights, he isn't interested in saving lives,he wants soldiers to dominate anyone who disagrees with him.
I didn't say to create more soldiers. Why do you always twist what I say? I merely stated reality that it's commonly viewed as PATRIOTIC to have babies, during times of attack or war. Strength in numbers, takes on renewed meaning. Countries that are populous, may find few enemies brave enough to risk destruction by agitating or attacking or invading them. Didn't I hear something to the effect that China could send a million people a day across the border for some time?
So you already know what happened to the Easter islanders, but just don't want to admit it? They didn't "overpop" at all, but due to false religion, decimated their own pop by cannibalism? Ever wonder why cannibalism is so taboo? Because it doesn't grow our pop, not to mention it is not pop-efficient way to feed people anyway,since people eat many times their weight in food. Is it any wonder, that populous humans are allowed to eat just about anything, other than people?
@pronatalist Actually overpopulation/deforestation also led to erosion, which made it difficult to grow crops. Without adequate food, the population crashed. A rich and complex society that erected now-iconic stone monuments was reduced to living in caves and resorted to cannibalism. I ask again why do you promote something that results in possible cannibalism?
In the movie Artificial Intelligence, the human pop crashed and went away, why? Apparently due to robot gigolos and plummeting social mores. People didn't have the challenges of raising real children anymore, due to the "without risks" pretend robotic children invented by "scientists." Ice age at the end, was because nature noticed that man had disappeared, and cried and froze up, having no reason to maintain a warm climate
How do you know Easter Island wasn't a lack of procreating, as in Artificial Intelligence? What I have been warning against. I notice that these days, people are having fewer children, and yet some people would rather parrot anti-people lies, than warn that maybe we aren't even having enough children to maintain our society and do the work while our elderly get old.
False religion has consequences. Did they cut down the trees, to burn wood for sacrifices to false gods?
Why does supposedly being anti-contraception, supposedly discredit PRI? I've already said that I'm anti-contraception, so does that mean you don't want to hear truth from me either? Maybe you secretly like the PRI videos, for you just can't seem to stop dropping comments on them?
Guys don't like to use condoms. But it's not just that, I've listed many problems with condoms, and suggested that real men aren't afraid of babies and of being responsible married fathers.
Isn't it far more likely, that when people are open to the truth, that they also tend to turn anti-contraception?
I explained why I will not accept the "everybody agrees" lie, as it's very unlikely to be true, and yet you continue to parrot crap about 58 national science academies. If you have so many stats at the ready, why don't you tell us how many science academies disagree? Or have you conveniently defined "academy" such that any that disagree, must be "Churches?"
You and your mad scientist pop control creeps, aren't just opposing most every Church and "religious" person of faith. You are also in opposition to jobs and greedy corporations. Perhaps I have been a bit negligent, in keeping a running tally of every commercial I've seen, that overtly or subtlety suggests having a baby or growing one's family bigger, so as to sell more product. Do adults buy educational toys or Nintendo DSs for themselves? No, for multiplying children.
Where did I ever say, that only people who have massive families should live? I have long advocated pro-life for people worldwide. Families come in all sizes. I, like a lot of people, do not believe in hindering the natural spread of human life, so of course, some fertile families may sometimes grow quite large.
There's all sorts of reasons to reject "birth control," so it's not just "kooks" who enjoy "uncontrolled" births. Some finally gave up on shoddy contraceptives.
1.4 earths? Why do you expect anybody to believe such an obviously made-up number, when your own pop phobic creeps say numbers like 4 earths?
Gov may be hiding "free energy" and flying saucers from us, but to typically gullible Americans, it's hard to "prove" conspiracy theories. Such technologies could do wonders towards letting pops grow freely, however, perhaps flying saucer fleet is way too small to colonize other planets. So we have to let this planet grow denser.
I think the NWO criminal elites, are already planning the next war, and who they plan to murder, if they can. The 12 tribes of Israel, scattered all over the world. According to a few YouTube videos, the Negros are the tribe of Judah. American Indians are the tribe of Gad.
But I believe God will ultimately deliver us from those evil people
Somebody on a TV game show, said pop pretty much only goes up. Yeah, that's about the way I see it, or how it should be. Embrace, ADAPT
@pronatalist There are no "races" you imbecile, there are 7 billion genetically unique humans. They all evolved from a common ancestor with other apes. p.s. there are more than 50,000 possible religions so the odds of one of them actually being correct is less than 1 in 50,000 and none of them are any more likely than a pink unicorn from pluto. The odds of there being no sky fairy is higher than 1 in 2.
58 national science academies agree that overpopulation is a major issue. The millennium ecosystem assessment -an international synthesis by over 1000 of the world's leading biological scientists found that the majority of ecosystems studied are in decline and that we rely on ecosystem services for trillions of dollars of free services per year that would need replacing if we continue to use ecosystem service resources faster than they can be replaced or recycled.
Asians are half the world pop. I saw an old book in a library entitled "Too Many Asians." Oh really? I suspect they would name it something else if it was written today, for they would like to be racist, without being nailed for admitting to racism?
What if the Asians decide that they are the better half, and suggest we get rid of everybody who isn't Asian?
African countries are about the only ones obeying God - Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
as soon as we run out of oil we will begin to suffer problems producing energy, goods and food, that will lead to an increase in worldwide death rate.
Hey, here's a creative solution hat probably will never happen, why don't all the governments of the world come together and agree that the human race practice abstinence for 5 years. Boom problem solved without starting WW3.
Food, water, and energy are mostly about power. The United States produces enough food to feed the world, but politics and business get in the way of sharing. Our management of these three crucial things has everything to do with power. Who gets how much and who shares with who.
Will it hold us? Probably. But we will probably starve to death before we reach 10 billion. If we can stray from money and oil, then we have a good chance of making it.
Condoms and smaller family sizes are the best way to save the planet because no one dies and everyone gets a bigger share, see "Overconsumpulation" or "One Planet One Child" for more.
We need to get rid of 5 billion people fast. Like always, engineering your situation works best. The happens to be 5 billion religious people consuming resources and doing nothing good, so lets exterminate them first. This way we free up resources and we bring up the average IQ by dropping the low hangers. Nest we euthanize the wealthy as they are mostly at fault for the worlds problems. With 2 billion logical stable Atheists running earth, it will be a Star Trek existence from then on
@699backstab Ok, so you would kill most of the population of the world and you would have to fund it with some leftover money as you couldn't get any funding from the rich? How would this really be possible? And also by killing all religious people you wouldn't likely increase the average IQ, but just keep it the same. Also there would be FAR LESS people to do things for you (You know how Alabama has that anti-mexican laws, you would kind of end up with no one to do your land skaping like them.)
Religious people are incredibly dumb. I simply tell them that god concept called and they want a personal visit. They kill themselves with any of the various way available. They can make a trek to one of the holes in the American desert where they did the underground nuclear weapons test and fill it with themselves. Free. If they refuse they arent religious, they are just following a line. Mexico is mostly religious so they will be gone. I am an Atheist. We run this planet.
@699backstab Don't speak for other people. The world is filled with ignorant people like you. Keep your opinions to yourself. Everyone has their own view. You might offend someone.
@699backstab You would be surprised, some of the smartest people I know are religious! A friend at my youth group has skipped 2 grades, and I guess I should include my self. At my school I have made high scores on the math and science benchmarks, missing only two questions on each (out of 30). I would like to see a study that proves what you are saying (e.x. % of people who work at prestigious institutions religion.)
@coopf Religiosity and intelligence. Put that into Wikipedia. You are religious so I expect you are incapable of lateral logical thinking. You are incapable of accepting defeat. Your "faith" keeps you from being as intelligent as me, the Atheist. Studies have been done. The evidence is in. Faith is the new stupid. Fact!
@remytv Hitler was Catholic and he used his Catholicism to fuel his Jew genocide. See what I mean. Religion kills. Fake god= crazy unstable weak humans= genocidal maniacs
@699backstab Yo, don't go hating on religious people, having a religion is fine. There are intelligent Christians out there, they just have a different mindset.
Religion only kills if you're one of those crazy people. :L I'm an agnostic atheist, myself.
Our problem is we make bad choices. we do not distribute our resources evenly and we waste and polute them. if we were careful enough, we MIGHT be able to support 10 billion, but even then our resources will end up with a limit no matter how careful we are. So the question is, what do we do?
ummm.... welll.. there are tons of old people in homes that "want" to die.. but the nursing homes do what ever they can to keep them living.. why not allow nature to take it's course and allow them to die. ... I have nothing against old people... btw.
Hey everyone. I’m currently promoting street performers that have plenty of skills and talents but lack exposure. I have about 40 videos in the channel. It would mean the world to me if you stopped by and checked it out. If you could just leave a comment and tell me your thoughts, it would help us all. I know you read these types of things all the time, but I honestly think these performers deserve to be seen. Please help us out and check out the Videos. Thanks :)
guys we need to start holding up our resources and stop wasting it on cars etc. , metal is a precious resource here once were out, we don't have resources to build ships to travel other planets, and the world can't hold everbody, we are and adaptable species, we are not a parasite, we need to start moving to other planets, space is important and resources, and energy, I hope we can, travel to other planets for the next 200 years, forever humanity, fuck you all HUMANS are parasites bitches.
Don't forget, perhaps in the not so distant future, car congestion becomes a thing of the past. How do we know? Already the movies, are telling us, that cars of the future, do not drive on roads, but fly and hover in the air.
We already have a few of The Jetsons cartoon inventions. They have "slide-walks" at airports. Supposedly, according to The Jetsons DVDs at least, the food-a-rack-a-cyle, is our microwave oven. Flip cellphones look much like Star Trek TOS communicators.
@pronatalist uh what? I can't tell what you're trying to say here but the Jetsons was supposed to take place in the early 2000's but that was a complete misjudgment. I don't see us having a typical "movie" future for another couple of centuries and "flying car" congestion will be just as bad if not worse than traffic today. Did you ever see how they coordinate planes at the airport? Imagine if that number of planes increased 100000 fold...
@ab102192 pronatalist is insane. He wants to ban condoms and has no regard for the environment whatsoever. He wants women to be baby factories, he is probably Christian taliban ;)
No, that's something The Jetsons got completely wrong. Flying cars, likely will not cause congestion, any more than free flying birds "congest" the sky. There's a natural flow to such things, and flying cars probably would NOT be confined to narrow traffic lanes, like on The Jetsons. How were they to know, back in the 1960s, that computers might someday actually drive the cars?
Cells travel in the blood, without congestion. Computers could "flow" traffic, much like crowds.
Traffic flow for flying cars, would be completely different, than for airplanes. Flying cars would likely quickly obsolete airplanes, actually.
Let's talk about what a flying car is. According to The Jetsons, and how many movies?, flying cars do NOT have wings. Completely different "anti-gravity" technology, that can fly, or hover, at 20 mph, or even 2 mph, or 0 mph, making vastly improved traffic flow patterns possible.
You think there can't be radical changes, improvements, in mere decades or years? So how come we don't have massive car wrecks, and people dying, on the "information superhighway" usually called the internet? Look at the growing "congestion" of video streaming over internet, that is replacing crappy TV channels. Because data flows VERY WELL, over the right kind of technology.
Why "control?" Because it's wrong and perhaps ineffective. Human pop isn't meant to be "controlled"
Why "limit" in quotes? This use of quotes, means an alert that the word might not mean what it seems to say. Are "limits" limiting, if they don't limit? If we try to "limit" the natural human pop increase, and it goes on and grows anyway, where is the "limit?"
U.S. has debt "limit," but due to fiat dishonest paper currency, the "limit" is a cruel ineffective joke. Gov keeps raising "limit," meaning our currency is soon to fail.
In fact, isn't that part of the "overpop" paranoia? That world pop may just go on and grow "wild," "without limit?"
Why do I put the word "wild" in quotes? Should I? I mean that I literally advocate that the already "huge" human race, be urged to grow naturally "wild." No effort at all to restrain growing baby booms, should world pop begin surging "out of control" again, for some reason, say like by people wisening up and finding "religious" objections to "birth control."
Actually, the "huge" world pop spreading to more worlds, is much misunderstood. We really don't need to worry about that for some time, for it's simply far easier, and cheaper, to figure out how to squeeze "several planets' worth of people," onto this world, than it is to make any other worlds habitable, nor how to move "burgeoning billions" of other people to other worlds. That's a reason why I have been harping to let world pop density rise naturally. It's far cheaper, easier.
One of the reasons cars are so common, is because in many spread-out low-density urban areas, cars are actually the cheapest way, per capita, to move people around. We need cars, to prevent the oppression of the poor. If people were limited to jobs that are only within walking distance, would the wages be all that good? No, we need more competition to improve working conditions and wages. Cars give people far more choices.
I do want to see humans on more worlds, IN THE MOVIES.
Much of the car, does not have to built of metal anyway, well unless metal is still the cheapest and best way to build many parts? Some cars have body panels of plastic or fiberglass? Carbon fiber panels are lighter-weight, but still a bit too expensive for common cars?
Aluminum is 8% of the earth's crust, or so I read some time ago on a CD-ROM encyclopedia. That's huge. No way we could use so much. Airplanes are largely made of aluminum. Aluminum engines warm faster than steal
Human pop growth is very hard to "control," which is all the more reason, we shouldn't even bother with any effort to "limit" the natural increase of human numbers, and welcome countries everywhere to go ahead and relax and enjoy their large families, and let pops just naturally grow "wild"
The world had better be able to somehow hold everybody, for the "burgeoning billions" are still rising. Humans are highly ADAPTABLE, a very practical reason to suspect we can grow far denser
@pronatalist yeah, but just like water and a cup, a cup can only hold certain amounts of water, if you want more water you get another cup, also imagine, we humans take up so many space, factories, houses, buildings etc. we do take up a lot of space for our needs to survive and grow, but were adaptable and were not a parasite, we were ment, to grow and travel to other worlds.
People read between the lines!!! And it's no coincidence that the government, U.N., Elite global bankers, and the book of Revealations all point to depopulation. My bad we're not supposed to be that aware!
@pronatalist I'm definitely going to check that out. This video is so "problem, reaction, solution-ish" until it's not even funny. I mean..like they don't even try to hide it anymore. I thank God that ppl like me and u are awake I'm just hoping we can wake more people up. They killing us and dont try to hide it and people could care less.
What? Subliminal message? NWO criminal elitists don't want you looking behind curtains, asking probing questions. Now you are going to be in trouble. (sarcasm)
What? You like me, don't buy their crap about "too many" people on earth? As somebody put it, sounds about right, this video might not be anti-pop nor for pop "control." But it's a piece of a larger puzzle that is for forced global depop, and it's clearly based upon junk science, earth worship, rebellion against God.
@pronatalist "NWO criminal elitists"- What on Earth are you on about, you are yet another conspiracy theorist who fails to ask why it is that all of their ridiculous theories have so much info on them publicly available if they are so "secret". I pity people like you when there are so many radio hosts and authors making money from your gullibility and paranoia.
If you want to understand better what is going on, here's your homework assignment:
Go watch on YouTube, "The PRC Forum - Julian Simon (1of6)" Sidewinder77
Watch all 6 parts, if you can find them all. Understand what Julian Simon means by "wrong thinking." I have his old edition paperback, "The Ultimate Resource." He does a pretty good job explaining why more pop makes the world BETTER. But he doesn't get into problems of sin, NWO globalist depop conspiracy deceptions, etc
@pronatalist Julian Simon failed to predict that every single measure of ecosystem service quality has shown we are losing them at an accelerating rate. He also failed to recognise the difference between causation and correlation. If population growth improved lives then explain why the country with the highest growth has the worst human rights and highest poverty level in the world?
Julian Simon also failed to notice that the world is finite, just like you.
I have to give NPR some credit, for talking about things that are important. So much on the TV and radio, is about as irrelevant as can be. Okay, I'm now done giving NPR credit for anything. Nice that they talk about important things. But why do they get it so WRONG all the time? Yes, pop is growing still, but we should CELEBRATE more human life, not portray it as a "problem." Libs have an inadequate grasp of reality, and wherever people are prospering, libs want to "change"end it
@pronatalist dude, a super-large pop is not a problem, unless people want to live in a way other than how Native Americans and other tribal people do/did. If they don't, and they want refrigerators and cars and all kinds of life-easing (but at the same time life-complicating) stuff, then we need way more than one Earth to provide the energy. It comes down to energy, and right now we ain't got enough.
A super-huge human pop, along with a primitive level of technology, presents many problems, which I expect technology is needed to mitigate. Planet is only but so big, so huge pop means a huge number of human anuses, not far from each other. They say it's not smart to poop into your drinking water. Too many big cities along a river, requires obviously, water treatment plants. Which use electricity and technology
So it's fine to procreate naturally, grow dense, but need technology
It's wonderful, to encourage large families in the most densely populated regions of the world, everywhere, but if we are to have so many people confined into some limited region, then people need more options, to mitigate for being so dense.
If people live in tall buildings, natural airflow may not be enough, so there's more need for air conditioning
Natural gas, propane, or electricity is needed for clean cooking, because millions of cooking fires in huge cities, isn't healthy
It's certainly possible, to have super-cities that are clean, beautiful, and healthy, but wouldn't you agree, they need proper trash collection? Doesn't that require transportation that works, cars, trucks, and such?
There's plenty of energy all around us, but to make it widely available and cheap enough for even the poor to afford it, until we get better technology, we need to develop ALL forms of energy that are economically viable, depending on region. Coal, oil, dams, nuclear
I believe it's quite fine and benefits far more people, to welcome pops to be both huge and dense. Let the people spread out as much as they want or can, but some countries obviously don't have as much land as others do.
More pop is fine and wonderful. But more pop + more poverty, is not ideal. We have to let the technology level grow along with the expanding pop, for that's a huge part of the natural ADAPTATION process.
Technology increases benefit while reducing pollution.
I meant that in big cities, to replace millions of smoky cooking fires burning trash, wood, coal, or dung, modern technology allows clean cooking, that is safer and more efficient, more controllable.
If there are millions of hungry mouths to feed, then of course there should be refrigerators, so people can plan ahead and have food for later. People should store up emergency rations of dried or canned foods, to cover for some inevitable power failures.
Don't believe those anti-pop liars who say we can't have both huge pop and for more people to enjoy modern technology. Surely you can find other examples, how the modern technologies help allow the world to grow so populous, more comfortably and safely
What makes us so much "better" than people in China or India? If we can have cars, why can't they?
We can't keep growing, and do things the same old ways? What if we modernized some ways, in order to keep naturally growing denser?
I have had communications with "pronatalist" before. He is a religious nut who thinks everything is a "conspiracy" and he also wants to ban all voluntary contraception outright. Sending women back to being mere baby factories is pronatalists idea of sky fairy heaven.
So some how the rate will change and in 88 years we will only gain 3 more billion that is 100k net per day when our current rate of growth is 230k net a day base on 2010 data sheet... not including exponential growth... the current modal shows around 12-15billion by 2100 when we can even support 7 let alone 6 billion... Good work NPR
7 billion. lol that's nothing. All four countries in the UK have a total land mass of 243,610 square kilometers (If wiki is to be believed). Lets be conservative and say theres 200 billion square meters. Dividing that by 7 billion = 28.5 square meters for every individual on the planet. The house I live in occupys 39.1 square meters (if my floorplan is to be believed).
Not amazing amount of space I know let alone roads, parks, etc... but my point is that there is plenty of space for everyone.
@mazk1985 Sorry but the average UK citizen uses 5-6 bioproductive hectares to supply their needs, 28.5 square metres couldn't feed a rabbit, let alone a human long term.
@phillips78 true but thats 28.5 sq m if everyone lived in the UK only. The UK is tiny compared to America, Russia and China so my point was that theres plenty of room on the planet. Hydroponics enables entire farms to fit in a single building and produces better food as well as being more tolerant to location. You can say this is a finite planet and it is true to a degree but the Sun pours energy onto us and its used by plants. This is a hugely abundant resource if used properly
@mazk1985 Sorry but I disagree witn you as do 58 national science academies. The world-average ecological footprint in 2007 was 2.7 global hectares per person (18.0 billion in total). With a world-average biocapacity of 1.8 global hectares per person (12 billion in total), this leads to an ecological deficit of 0.9 global hectares per person (6 billion in total). Don't forget that the majority of land on Earth is unfarmable. See the millennium ecosystem assessment for more info :)
@phillips78 Thats why I said hydroponics is the future of farming because it can be built vertically and can be placed anywhere with sunlight. Your quite right though that farmland is very precious and thats partly due to our current paradigm of waste resources for profit. Just checked out the millennium ecosystem site and it's got members on its board of directors from organisations run by Bilderburger's. I don't think it can be completely trusted
@mazk1985 The millennium ecosystem assessment is a compilation of scientific data from 120 countries. It is supported by all the major scientific academies.
@nathernrock
1maxell11 1 day ago
We are so gonna have a massive die off one day. I hope it is far into the future. Lack of water is going to be a problem soon.
cascadevadude 1 day ago
Wow.
chloepenguins 1 week ago
I don't believe, it's unbelievable.
oassunto 2 weeks ago
EVERYONE TO THE OCEAN! THERE IS A LOT OF FREE SPACE THERE!
Boomstick898 2 weeks ago
Asia is going to kill everybody.... And they are using babies to do it.
TheChickenRiceBowl 4 weeks ago
@TheChickenRiceBowl
Seems to me, that Asia probably wouldn't be half the world pop, if the rest of the world would reproduce naturally, like how God designed. Why do you criticize Asia, for obeying God?
And it's rather absurd to suggest that a HUGE continent, can't somehow hold, many billions of people.
India has 3 people per 2 acres. Yet they grew by 200 million beyond their already-billion, during the last decade. Proves even mismanaged India can manage to grow much denser.
pronatalist 3 weeks ago
@pronatalist ...Yeaaaah ummm. It sounds to me like you're taking this video and its comments and commenters waaaay too seriously. Go get some fresh air then come back, mmk?
TheChickenRiceBowl 3 weeks ago
@TheChickenRiceBowl
And why should I not take the pop issue controversy, seriously? Why should I stand back and do nothing, while liberals try to take away my rights to have children, and devalue human life? Besides, God called me to be a pro-life activist a few decades ago. Do you think the only way to do that, is to hold picket signs as some terrible abortion clinic?, although I have done that too.
It's good that We Got So Big So Fast. Better than having never lived at all.
pronatalist 3 weeks ago
@pronatalist Yeah you're insane and I hope you die before you get the chance to have children. Well given the chance that anyone would be stupid enough to be with you in the first place. And holding up picket signs isn't going to solve anything it usually makes thing worse.
TheChickenRiceBowl 2 weeks ago
Yall niggas commentin in the youtube troll section.
nickgarza20 1 month ago
this makes me have to pee
musiclover9571 1 month ago 20
@musiclover9571 I peed my self
LuckyLoveLovesYou 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the longer children stay in school, the fewer children they will have. Smaller families can provide more resources for each child, and entire nations benefit when they have fewer children to drain their limited, declining resources. So education is the key to humane population stabilization.
nathernrock 1 month ago
Now i feel like takin a piss...
YuckFou68 1 month ago
Ragging on birth control because you personally don't like it is pretty small minded. Pull your head out of the sand.
Betty2287 1 month ago
@Betty2287
You do NOT have the right to destroy humanity by putting evil creeps NWO criminal elitists like tyrant Obama into power. What are you? An evil Nazi?
A colony on the moon? Do you really think we are ready to build spaceships with 6 feet of lead shielding to get through the Van Allen Belt? Yes, I am suggesting that we Americans probably faked the moon landings. What a liar country U.S. is. 9-11 was an inside job.
Lots of people don't like "birth control." Where's our choice?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@Betty2287
Seems like the list of shoddy contraceptive methods, gets ever longer. They are all shoddy, because God did not design people to use "birth control," but to Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth, as God commanded clearly in Genesis. No wonder human pop growth is so hard to control. God promised Abraham "uncountable" descendents, liked to the dust, grains of sand of seashore, or stars of the sky for their multitude.
Where is the "no method" method, on that long list?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist you assume to much i pity your anger
larkrisehobbit 3 weeks ago
Theres just not comment space to write a full damn message. So ill sum it up. Leave other countries alone. Africa wants to have aids, let them have aids. Middle east wants to have fun splosion time with each other. Let them have fun splosion time with each other. WE cant take care of our own shit, Why should we stick our noses in everyone elses. The day i see America not got to war, is the day i will gladly puncture my eye sockets with a rusty spoon.
idraw4me 1 month ago
@idraw4me
From what I hear, African AIDS came from the NWO vaccination campaign, as part of evil depop agenda. NWO creeps know that Negros are the tribe of Judah, and they want to murder the 12 tribes of Israel, which are now scattered all over the world.
Otherwise, sounds like you make a good point. If Africa and Middle East like to enjoy their pop "explosion," let them. More and more people would be glad to live, and by populating countries more densely, lots more world pop can fit.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@idraw4me
Not long ago, family size was simply thought "uncontrollable."
Why do we have such a bewildering array of contraceptive "options?" It's because they are all SHODDY. God never designed the human body for use of "birth control" measures, and that's why they don't work so well. So what does rebellious man do? Come up with yet another shoddy experimental method?
I reject imposing pop "control" on people, also reject "birth control." Let people multiply freely, families grow big.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist And yet another stupid unintelligent rant. WOW. MORON.
Betty2287 1 month ago
@pronatalist when WOMEN demand birth control, they deserve it.
nathernrock 1 month ago
@nathernrock
Are you saying that women who demand "birth control," deserve to have their bodies damaged, and deserve not to have children, for their selfishness?
Why are contraceptives, such a pagan idol in society now? Is that what happens when lies aren't challenged early enough? The entire society goes insane, with perhaps a few exceptions?
Was what Adolf Hitler did to destroy his country and the world, just totally outrageous? So how come so many people went along with him?
pronatalist 1 month ago
Well, time to go have 15 kids.
wtfisagoodusername 1 month ago 15
@wtfisagoodusername
Why did you say to go have 15 children? A joke?
Actually, that's the answer. Stop crazed liberals from disparaging human life, and let human life spread freely like how God designed us to multiply. Even nature wants us multiplying, for in nature, life spreads into most every available niche.
If the world grew more pronatalist, if people would repent and shun the shoddy contraceptives, and tell truth about how contraceptives are crap, we'd ADAPT better.
pronatalist 3 weeks ago
If you are actually paying attention, this is not propaganda for any political side. It's just good food for thought. Who can argue with the notion that we have to be efficient and responsible with our resources? Great video, Adam!!!
peaslee12918 1 month ago
This is a damned awful video to watch if you need to use the bathroom.
SV98Predator 1 month ago
nice video dude
alanimoikan 1 month ago
Judgement Day or WW3 is necessary to reduce the population for recovery of the Earth!!!
hill33ification 1 month ago
@hill33ification
FYI, the New Jerusalem description in the Bible, makes God's beautiful city, sound quite incomprehensibly enormous in size. Perhaps Judgement Day is not going to make the dent into human pop size, that you were hoping for. Although, "overpop" can never be against a concern, without the wicked politicians so messing up the world.
The natural increase of mankind, is not the problem. It's the greed and wickedness of liberals, politicians, nature worshiper liars.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@hill33ification lets start with you then!
Betty2287 1 month ago
Every person in the world , shoulder to shoulder, can fit in a place the size of LA. The only problem is resources. By the time we reach 10 billion, we should be a little more advanced in that aspect.
thetechgeneration 1 month ago
more liberal hysteria, wrong in the 60s, wrong now --- go watch 7 Billion People: Everybody Relax!
itubeyoublah 1 month ago
@itubeyoublah "7 Billion People: Everybody Relax!" was made by an anti-contraception religious group called PRI. They are not a scientific body and 58 national science acdemies disagree with them and their misleading videos. I suggest you look up the millennium ecosystem assessments five volumes of peer reviewed science showing how humans use ecosystem services faster than they can be replaced or replenished. Your logic is along the lines of "I haven't crashed yet, so I never ever will"?!
phillips78 1 month ago
@itubeyoublah
Most every year, out come the psychics, and the pundits, and the mad scientists with their theories, predicting either how the new year will be, or making predictions about "If we don't do X within Y short years, the world is doomed." Most all the predictions soon turn out to be wrong. The pop didn't crash and everybody starve, like Paul Ehrlich predicted in "The Pop Bomb" c1968. So ever greedy for money, he toned down his dire predictions a tad in"The Pop Explosion"
pronatalist 1 month ago
@itubeyoublah
The liberal immoral potheads, had their Woodstock in the 1960s, and announced their "Free Love," their "the pill," and their new immoral hippie counter-culture, and what do we have to show for it? Less pop than we could have enjoyed. Rampant divorces and rampant abortions. Many women's bodies fertility damaged by abortions and contraceptives, families and now even society and countries falling apart, The Great Obama Depression, rampant job loss and home foreclosures.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist Wow your are a moron! You should go create a colony on the moon and take all your bigot friends with you!
GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!
Betty2287 1 month ago
@pronatalist stop forcing your views on others
larkrisehobbit 3 weeks ago
@larkrisehobbit
Did I select Oct. 31, 2011, as 7 billion day? Was I the one who made 7 billion a PR stunt, an excuse for libs to come out of the woodwork, yet again, every time we supposedly add the next billion?
Do I have the big radio megaphone that npr has?
So why do you accuse me of "forcing" my views onto anybody? Who has to listen to me? I'm not on the radio dial, unless I call a talk show, wait half an hour in the queue, and then get selected to take my turn.
pronatalist 3 weeks ago
@larkrisehobbit
According to the evidence I just listed, it's the pop phobics who are forcing their views, because not only are they wrong, but they have the bigger megaphone, which is often at least partially paid for, by the taxpayers, the very people who would expect to keep their money, to support their own growing families.
Why are we robbed of our money, to subsidize the shoddy contraceptives, ObamaCare, and Big Pharma? Why does the NWO criminal elites debase OUR money?
pronatalist 3 weeks ago
For 2006, humanity's total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.4 planet Earths – in other words, humanity uses ecological services 1.4 times as fast as Earth can renew them.
phillips78 1 month ago
War... will keep the population controled..... i dont like the idea of it but it make sence if u think about it....
zook0770 1 month ago
@zook0770
War does not keep human pop "controlled." War makes "overpop" worse, for it destroys resources and economy upon which people depend, while at the same time, the stress encourages even more pop growth. During war, especially, it's PATRIOTIC to have babies. Babies help rebuild the country, and may provide future soldiers, or political clout to prevent losing to the enemy the next time, even if it's merely a political contest.
Human pop grows far faster, than wars kill people.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist At last we see your true colours, you aren't interested in womens rights or childrens rights, you just want to breed others out of existence. You are a eugenicist.
Wars almost always result from conflicts over resources, especially in the last 50 years. If everyone had less kids we would have less wars. p.s. pronatalist openly supports the taliban, have a look at their past comments.
phillips78 1 month ago
@phillips78
So I want to make women "baby factories?" Can't you think of any new bogus claims to make? If they are married, what's the guy who sticks around, doing? Isn't he working, to help pay the bills? These days, even fathers change diapers. So how is the woman the "baby factory," but the man gets off scot-free? How does the man feel, when he has a wife who wants a big family, and she's almost always seeming to be pregnant? How many women take advantage, and offload their work?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
Okay, so did you just disprove your own religion of evolution, atheism, nature worship, overpop, or whatever religion you admit to? Don't tell me that people who rebel against God aren't "religious" when their claims aren't based upon actual science.
Yes, the majority of people are wrong, but religions overlap in their claims, so it's not quite so simple as you stated it.
What cue cards are you reading that "sky fairy" crap off of?
How do you claim I am a eugenicist?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist You only want people to live if they have massive families and resultant wars over resources.
phillips78 1 month ago
@phillips78
I said the obvious alternative to Nazi eugenics, is to let everybody reproduce. Now what have I said, inconsistent with that statement?
Eugenicists have racist claims, some people ought to be allowed to reproduce more so than others, and many "undesirable" classes of people should be "convinced" into using contraceptives.
I do not believe the human race can be "improved" in such a way, and I have long advocated natural "uncontrolled" fertility, large families worldwide
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist No, you are basically saying that women shouldn't have a choice in how many kids they have.
phillips78 1 month ago
@phillips78
How can I possibly for for wanting to "breed others out of existence," when I said that sex should be natural, and that we should encourage more people to marry young, welcome a larger proportion of the already "huge" human race to become sexually active, and allow babies to happen naturally without use of any means of "birth control?" Who is my group that aims to breed others out of existence,when I said I urge large families WORLDWIDE? That's ALL groups welcome to grow
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist " During war, especially, it's PATRIOTIC to have babies. Babies help rebuild the country, and may provide future soldiers, or political clout to prevent losing to the enemy the next time" quote from pronatalist. He clearly isn't interested in womens rights, he isn't interested in saving lives,he wants soldiers to dominate anyone who disagrees with him.
phillips78 1 month ago
@phillips78
I didn't say to create more soldiers. Why do you always twist what I say? I merely stated reality that it's commonly viewed as PATRIOTIC to have babies, during times of attack or war. Strength in numbers, takes on renewed meaning. Countries that are populous, may find few enemies brave enough to risk destruction by agitating or attacking or invading them. Didn't I hear something to the effect that China could send a million people a day across the border for some time?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
So you already know what happened to the Easter islanders, but just don't want to admit it? They didn't "overpop" at all, but due to false religion, decimated their own pop by cannibalism? Ever wonder why cannibalism is so taboo? Because it doesn't grow our pop, not to mention it is not pop-efficient way to feed people anyway,since people eat many times their weight in food. Is it any wonder, that populous humans are allowed to eat just about anything, other than people?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist Actually overpopulation/deforestation also led to erosion, which made it difficult to grow crops. Without adequate food, the population crashed. A rich and complex society that erected now-iconic stone monuments was reduced to living in caves and resorted to cannibalism. I ask again why do you promote something that results in possible cannibalism?
phillips78 1 month ago
@phillips78
In the movie Artificial Intelligence, the human pop crashed and went away, why? Apparently due to robot gigolos and plummeting social mores. People didn't have the challenges of raising real children anymore, due to the "without risks" pretend robotic children invented by "scientists." Ice age at the end, was because nature noticed that man had disappeared, and cried and froze up, having no reason to maintain a warm climate
You haven't proved Easter Island was "overpop"
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
How do you know Easter Island wasn't a lack of procreating, as in Artificial Intelligence? What I have been warning against. I notice that these days, people are having fewer children, and yet some people would rather parrot anti-people lies, than warn that maybe we aren't even having enough children to maintain our society and do the work while our elderly get old.
False religion has consequences. Did they cut down the trees, to burn wood for sacrifices to false gods?
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
Why does supposedly being anti-contraception, supposedly discredit PRI? I've already said that I'm anti-contraception, so does that mean you don't want to hear truth from me either? Maybe you secretly like the PRI videos, for you just can't seem to stop dropping comments on them?
Guys don't like to use condoms. But it's not just that, I've listed many problems with condoms, and suggested that real men aren't afraid of babies and of being responsible married fathers.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
Isn't it far more likely, that when people are open to the truth, that they also tend to turn anti-contraception?
I explained why I will not accept the "everybody agrees" lie, as it's very unlikely to be true, and yet you continue to parrot crap about 58 national science academies. If you have so many stats at the ready, why don't you tell us how many science academies disagree? Or have you conveniently defined "academy" such that any that disagree, must be "Churches?"
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
You and your mad scientist pop control creeps, aren't just opposing most every Church and "religious" person of faith. You are also in opposition to jobs and greedy corporations. Perhaps I have been a bit negligent, in keeping a running tally of every commercial I've seen, that overtly or subtlety suggests having a baby or growing one's family bigger, so as to sell more product. Do adults buy educational toys or Nintendo DSs for themselves? No, for multiplying children.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
Where did I ever say, that only people who have massive families should live? I have long advocated pro-life for people worldwide. Families come in all sizes. I, like a lot of people, do not believe in hindering the natural spread of human life, so of course, some fertile families may sometimes grow quite large.
There's all sorts of reasons to reject "birth control," so it's not just "kooks" who enjoy "uncontrolled" births. Some finally gave up on shoddy contraceptives.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@phillips78
1.4 earths? Why do you expect anybody to believe such an obviously made-up number, when your own pop phobic creeps say numbers like 4 earths?
Gov may be hiding "free energy" and flying saucers from us, but to typically gullible Americans, it's hard to "prove" conspiracy theories. Such technologies could do wonders towards letting pops grow freely, however, perhaps flying saucer fleet is way too small to colonize other planets. So we have to let this planet grow denser.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@zook0770
I think the NWO criminal elites, are already planning the next war, and who they plan to murder, if they can. The 12 tribes of Israel, scattered all over the world. According to a few YouTube videos, the Negros are the tribe of Judah. American Indians are the tribe of Gad.
But I believe God will ultimately deliver us from those evil people
Somebody on a TV game show, said pop pretty much only goes up. Yeah, that's about the way I see it, or how it should be. Embrace, ADAPT
pronatalist 1 month ago
@pronatalist There are no "races" you imbecile, there are 7 billion genetically unique humans. They all evolved from a common ancestor with other apes. p.s. there are more than 50,000 possible religions so the odds of one of them actually being correct is less than 1 in 50,000 and none of them are any more likely than a pink unicorn from pluto. The odds of there being no sky fairy is higher than 1 in 2.
phillips78 1 month ago
58 national science academies agree that overpopulation is a major issue. The millennium ecosystem assessment -an international synthesis by over 1000 of the world's leading biological scientists found that the majority of ecosystems studied are in decline and that we rely on ecosystem services for trillions of dollars of free services per year that would need replacing if we continue to use ecosystem service resources faster than they can be replaced or recycled.
phillips78 1 month ago
Australia is irrelevant and non-existent, apparently.
trickster309 1 month ago
i say kill africans and asians, that will solve the population problem.
N1RealMadridFan 1 month ago
@N1RealMadridFan
Asians are half the world pop. I saw an old book in a library entitled "Too Many Asians." Oh really? I suspect they would name it something else if it was written today, for they would like to be racist, without being nailed for admitting to racism?
What if the Asians decide that they are the better half, and suggest we get rid of everybody who isn't Asian?
African countries are about the only ones obeying God - Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.
pronatalist 1 month ago
how did we get fat?
applekid321 1 month ago
@applekid321
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
pronatalist 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@applekid321
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
pronatalist 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@applekid321
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@applekid321
How did we get fat? Well a conspiracy theory says the put stuff in our food to make us fat. Immigrants come to America, and they plump right up, so it must be stuff they put in our food. Maybe, but don't people need to take responsibility for what they eat and for their lack of exercise?
It surely is a sign of the decline of America. Every other commercial on TV, is for a fat chair, or for the latest trendy pill Big Pharma is wanting to drug us for profits with.
pronatalist 1 month ago
*** Here is the technology to solve ALL Cyber Crime ***
SEARCH Cyber Mediation on YouTube
LiveComputing 1 month ago
"the U.N. says we'll level out at 10 billion" how creepy of them
LeastOfAllSaints123 1 month ago
im thirsty all of a sudden
metalbob123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
╭∩╮（⃕‿⃕）╭∩╮➔ CAPITALISM & COMMUNISM not EQUAL..!!!
DRUGLORDS+GOVERNMENT is COUNTERFEITING MONEY for SLAVERY.!!
BANKERS & DRUGLORDS screwed life & society in human history.
BURN DRUG LORDS ALIVE & OCCUPY THE WORLD.!!
CAPITALISM = NO REAL FREEDOM. WORLDS FAKE ECONOMY.
fight for LAST DROP BLOOD for MONEY & POWER = OPPORTUNIST MANIPULATIVE REALM LANDLORD GRABBER PIG ROYAL LAZY FAMILY.
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
koppellhinex 1 month ago
@procnet1 go to hell you racist pig
penguinlove12344 1 month ago
as soon as we run out of oil we will begin to suffer problems producing energy, goods and food, that will lead to an increase in worldwide death rate.
ajefajef 2 months ago
@ajefajef yeah, u can start by killing yourself now. that would save u some trouble since you are that naive and blunt to start off with.
Meowws 1 month ago
@Meowws i would like to see a constructive comment about the video than your little act of "being smart"
ajefajef 1 month ago
Hey, here's a creative solution hat probably will never happen, why don't all the governments of the world come together and agree that the human race practice abstinence for 5 years. Boom problem solved without starting WW3.
escapeofthedead 2 months ago
@escapeofthedead wow, i just realise that there is a moron more idiotic that the previous one below! oh that's you alright!
Meowws 1 month ago
Food, water, and energy are mostly about power. The United States produces enough food to feed the world, but politics and business get in the way of sharing. Our management of these three crucial things has everything to do with power. Who gets how much and who shares with who.
beckah21 2 months ago
Amazing visualisation!
BlackBobby69 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@my12steptruth your an fn pig for thinking like that, your a disgrace to humanity
villesteban 2 months ago
Comment removed
villesteban 2 months ago
Will it hold us? Probably. But we will probably starve to death before we reach 10 billion. If we can stray from money and oil, then we have a good chance of making it.
CaptainDishman 2 months ago
Condoms and smaller family sizes are the best way to save the planet because no one dies and everyone gets a bigger share, see "Overconsumpulation" or "One Planet One Child" for more.
phillips78 2 months ago
7 Billion: How Did We Get So Big So Fast?
BY FUCKING!
rorosamy 2 months ago 6
i need to pee... brb
defunkyman 2 months ago 2
'
what about ussr russians people,,,
what color liquid of ussr russia
bestamerica 2 months ago
We need to get rid of 5 billion people fast. Like always, engineering your situation works best. The happens to be 5 billion religious people consuming resources and doing nothing good, so lets exterminate them first. This way we free up resources and we bring up the average IQ by dropping the low hangers. Nest we euthanize the wealthy as they are mostly at fault for the worlds problems. With 2 billion logical stable Atheists running earth, it will be a Star Trek existence from then on
699backstab 2 months ago
@699backstab Ok, so you would kill most of the population of the world and you would have to fund it with some leftover money as you couldn't get any funding from the rich? How would this really be possible? And also by killing all religious people you wouldn't likely increase the average IQ, but just keep it the same. Also there would be FAR LESS people to do things for you (You know how Alabama has that anti-mexican laws, you would kind of end up with no one to do your land skaping like them.)
coopf 2 months ago
Religious people are incredibly dumb. I simply tell them that god concept called and they want a personal visit. They kill themselves with any of the various way available. They can make a trek to one of the holes in the American desert where they did the underground nuclear weapons test and fill it with themselves. Free. If they refuse they arent religious, they are just following a line. Mexico is mostly religious so they will be gone. I am an Atheist. We run this planet.
699backstab 2 months ago
@699backstab Don't speak for other people. The world is filled with ignorant people like you. Keep your opinions to yourself. Everyone has their own view. You might offend someone.
SyedSisters 2 months ago
@699backstab You would be surprised, some of the smartest people I know are religious! A friend at my youth group has skipped 2 grades, and I guess I should include my self. At my school I have made high scores on the math and science benchmarks, missing only two questions on each (out of 30). I would like to see a study that proves what you are saying (e.x. % of people who work at prestigious institutions religion.)
coopf 2 months ago
@coopf Religiosity and intelligence. Put that into Wikipedia. You are religious so I expect you are incapable of lateral logical thinking. You are incapable of accepting defeat. Your "faith" keeps you from being as intelligent as me, the Atheist. Studies have been done. The evidence is in. Faith is the new stupid. Fact!
699backstab 2 months ago
@699backstab welcome back Hitler
remytv 1 month ago
@remytv Hitler was Catholic and he used his Catholicism to fuel his Jew genocide. See what I mean. Religion kills. Fake god= crazy unstable weak humans= genocidal maniacs
699backstab 1 month ago
@699backstab Yo, don't go hating on religious people, having a religion is fine. There are intelligent Christians out there, they just have a different mindset.
Religion only kills if you're one of those crazy people. :L I'm an agnostic atheist, myself.
sassyqueen321 1 month ago
Our problem is we make bad choices. we do not distribute our resources evenly and we waste and polute them. if we were careful enough, we MIGHT be able to support 10 billion, but even then our resources will end up with a limit no matter how careful we are. So the question is, what do we do?
BloodRose123100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Interested in social action or social issues? Check out my channel at riverlife695 today!
riverlife695 2 months ago
BIB. More great facts-data b-school videos at academybridge
gerarddanford 2 months ago
Really well-produced.
HunterFDavis 2 months ago
amazing stuff
tallestheights 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ummm.... welll.. there are tons of old people in homes that "want" to die.. but the nursing homes do what ever they can to keep them living.. why not allow nature to take it's course and allow them to die. ... I have nothing against old people... btw.
kerrydlight 2 months ago
Hey everyone. I’m currently promoting street performers that have plenty of skills and talents but lack exposure. I have about 40 videos in the channel. It would mean the world to me if you stopped by and checked it out. If you could just leave a comment and tell me your thoughts, it would help us all. I know you read these types of things all the time, but I honestly think these performers deserve to be seen. Please help us out and check out the Videos. Thanks :)
YourStreetPerformer 2 months ago
the only solution is to kill babies
dmnjt2 2 months ago 2
Not if eugenicists have anything to say about it.
djeminescu 2 months ago
guys we need to start holding up our resources and stop wasting it on cars etc. , metal is a precious resource here once were out, we don't have resources to build ships to travel other planets, and the world can't hold everbody, we are and adaptable species, we are not a parasite, we need to start moving to other planets, space is important and resources, and energy, I hope we can, travel to other planets for the next 200 years, forever humanity, fuck you all HUMANS are parasites bitches.
hclfa4 2 months ago
@hclfa4 metal cannot be wasted unless it is chemically altered, any metal used on cars can easily be recovered
ab102192 2 months ago
@ab102192
Don't forget, perhaps in the not so distant future, car congestion becomes a thing of the past. How do we know? Already the movies, are telling us, that cars of the future, do not drive on roads, but fly and hover in the air.
We already have a few of The Jetsons cartoon inventions. They have "slide-walks" at airports. Supposedly, according to The Jetsons DVDs at least, the food-a-rack-a-cyle, is our microwave oven. Flip cellphones look much like Star Trek TOS communicators.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist uh what? I can't tell what you're trying to say here but the Jetsons was supposed to take place in the early 2000's but that was a complete misjudgment. I don't see us having a typical "movie" future for another couple of centuries and "flying car" congestion will be just as bad if not worse than traffic today. Did you ever see how they coordinate planes at the airport? Imagine if that number of planes increased 100000 fold...
ab102192 2 months ago
@ab102192 pronatalist is insane. He wants to ban condoms and has no regard for the environment whatsoever. He wants women to be baby factories, he is probably Christian taliban ;)
phillips78 2 months ago
@ab102192
No, that's something The Jetsons got completely wrong. Flying cars, likely will not cause congestion, any more than free flying birds "congest" the sky. There's a natural flow to such things, and flying cars probably would NOT be confined to narrow traffic lanes, like on The Jetsons. How were they to know, back in the 1960s, that computers might someday actually drive the cars?
Cells travel in the blood, without congestion. Computers could "flow" traffic, much like crowds.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@ab102192
Traffic flow for flying cars, would be completely different, than for airplanes. Flying cars would likely quickly obsolete airplanes, actually.
Let's talk about what a flying car is. According to The Jetsons, and how many movies?, flying cars do NOT have wings. Completely different "anti-gravity" technology, that can fly, or hover, at 20 mph, or even 2 mph, or 0 mph, making vastly improved traffic flow patterns possible.
Computer drivers (iRobot) eliminate "moron drivers."
pronatalist 1 month ago
@ab102192
You think there can't be radical changes, improvements, in mere decades or years? So how come we don't have massive car wrecks, and people dying, on the "information superhighway" usually called the internet? Look at the growing "congestion" of video streaming over internet, that is replacing crappy TV channels. Because data flows VERY WELL, over the right kind of technology.
Why "control?" Because it's wrong and perhaps ineffective. Human pop isn't meant to be "controlled"
pronatalist 1 month ago
@ab102192
Why "limit" in quotes? This use of quotes, means an alert that the word might not mean what it seems to say. Are "limits" limiting, if they don't limit? If we try to "limit" the natural human pop increase, and it goes on and grows anyway, where is the "limit?"
U.S. has debt "limit," but due to fiat dishonest paper currency, the "limit" is a cruel ineffective joke. Gov keeps raising "limit," meaning our currency is soon to fail.
I don't believe in pop "limit," hence quotes.
pronatalist 1 month ago
@ab102192
In fact, isn't that part of the "overpop" paranoia? That world pop may just go on and grow "wild," "without limit?"
Why do I put the word "wild" in quotes? Should I? I mean that I literally advocate that the already "huge" human race, be urged to grow naturally "wild." No effort at all to restrain growing baby booms, should world pop begin surging "out of control" again, for some reason, say like by people wisening up and finding "religious" objections to "birth control."
pronatalist 1 month ago
@hclfa4
Actually, the "huge" world pop spreading to more worlds, is much misunderstood. We really don't need to worry about that for some time, for it's simply far easier, and cheaper, to figure out how to squeeze "several planets' worth of people," onto this world, than it is to make any other worlds habitable, nor how to move "burgeoning billions" of other people to other worlds. That's a reason why I have been harping to let world pop density rise naturally. It's far cheaper, easier.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@hclfa4
One of the reasons cars are so common, is because in many spread-out low-density urban areas, cars are actually the cheapest way, per capita, to move people around. We need cars, to prevent the oppression of the poor. If people were limited to jobs that are only within walking distance, would the wages be all that good? No, we need more competition to improve working conditions and wages. Cars give people far more choices.
I do want to see humans on more worlds, IN THE MOVIES.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@hclfa4
Much of the car, does not have to built of metal anyway, well unless metal is still the cheapest and best way to build many parts? Some cars have body panels of plastic or fiberglass? Carbon fiber panels are lighter-weight, but still a bit too expensive for common cars?
Aluminum is 8% of the earth's crust, or so I read some time ago on a CD-ROM encyclopedia. That's huge. No way we could use so much. Airplanes are largely made of aluminum. Aluminum engines warm faster than steal
pronatalist 2 months ago
@hclfa4
Human pop growth is very hard to "control," which is all the more reason, we shouldn't even bother with any effort to "limit" the natural increase of human numbers, and welcome countries everywhere to go ahead and relax and enjoy their large families, and let pops just naturally grow "wild"
The world had better be able to somehow hold everybody, for the "burgeoning billions" are still rising. Humans are highly ADAPTABLE, a very practical reason to suspect we can grow far denser
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist why did you put the words control, limit and wild in quotes?
ab102192 2 months ago
@pronatalist yeah, but just like water and a cup, a cup can only hold certain amounts of water, if you want more water you get another cup, also imagine, we humans take up so many space, factories, houses, buildings etc. we do take up a lot of space for our needs to survive and grow, but were adaptable and were not a parasite, we were ment, to grow and travel to other worlds.
hclfa4 2 months ago
warning?
BekaShakur 2 months ago
WW3 the only way
germanhero5555555 2 months ago
I need to piss.
DGMedonja 2 months ago 2
good
balasious 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the population of israel 7,759,300
baniyas2011 2 months ago
the population of usa 312,791,771
baniyas2011 2 months ago
svdsvsdsasad
cfhfhbg 2 months ago
People read between the lines!!! And it's no coincidence that the government, U.N., Elite global bankers, and the book of Revealations all point to depopulation. My bad we're not supposed to be that aware!
resandor 2 months ago
@pronatalist I'm definitely going to check that out. This video is so "problem, reaction, solution-ish" until it's not even funny. I mean..like they don't even try to hide it anymore. I thank God that ppl like me and u are awake I'm just hoping we can wake more people up. They killing us and dont try to hide it and people could care less.
resandor 2 months ago
I love your video !!!!
I made a slide show to remember 2011 focusing on the world events how we, 7 billion people share the world.
Feel free to check it out when you have time. Thanks.
planetearth7billion 2 months ago
Can anybody else see the subliminal message behind this and what they are trying to indicate? Just checking
resandor 2 months ago
@resandor
What? Subliminal message? NWO criminal elitists don't want you looking behind curtains, asking probing questions. Now you are going to be in trouble. (sarcasm)
What? You like me, don't buy their crap about "too many" people on earth? As somebody put it, sounds about right, this video might not be anti-pop nor for pop "control." But it's a piece of a larger puzzle that is for forced global depop, and it's clearly based upon junk science, earth worship, rebellion against God.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist "NWO criminal elitists"- What on Earth are you on about, you are yet another conspiracy theorist who fails to ask why it is that all of their ridiculous theories have so much info on them publicly available if they are so "secret". I pity people like you when there are so many radio hosts and authors making money from your gullibility and paranoia.
phillips78 2 months ago
@resandor
If you want to understand better what is going on, here's your homework assignment:
Go watch on YouTube, "The PRC Forum - Julian Simon (1of6)" Sidewinder77
Watch all 6 parts, if you can find them all. Understand what Julian Simon means by "wrong thinking." I have his old edition paperback, "The Ultimate Resource." He does a pretty good job explaining why more pop makes the world BETTER. But he doesn't get into problems of sin, NWO globalist depop conspiracy deceptions, etc
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist Julian Simon failed to predict that every single measure of ecosystem service quality has shown we are losing them at an accelerating rate. He also failed to recognise the difference between causation and correlation. If population growth improved lives then explain why the country with the highest growth has the worst human rights and highest poverty level in the world?
Julian Simon also failed to notice that the world is finite, just like you.
phillips78 2 months ago
I'm sick of NPR's liberal bias. This is classic liberal fact giving.
kemup 2 months ago
@kemup
I have to give NPR some credit, for talking about things that are important. So much on the TV and radio, is about as irrelevant as can be. Okay, I'm now done giving NPR credit for anything. Nice that they talk about important things. But why do they get it so WRONG all the time? Yes, pop is growing still, but we should CELEBRATE more human life, not portray it as a "problem." Libs have an inadequate grasp of reality, and wherever people are prospering, libs want to "change"end it
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist dude, a super-large pop is not a problem, unless people want to live in a way other than how Native Americans and other tribal people do/did. If they don't, and they want refrigerators and cars and all kinds of life-easing (but at the same time life-complicating) stuff, then we need way more than one Earth to provide the energy. It comes down to energy, and right now we ain't got enough.
kemup 2 months ago
@kemup
A super-huge human pop, along with a primitive level of technology, presents many problems, which I expect technology is needed to mitigate. Planet is only but so big, so huge pop means a huge number of human anuses, not far from each other. They say it's not smart to poop into your drinking water. Too many big cities along a river, requires obviously, water treatment plants. Which use electricity and technology
So it's fine to procreate naturally, grow dense, but need technology
pronatalist 2 months ago
@kemup
It's wonderful, to encourage large families in the most densely populated regions of the world, everywhere, but if we are to have so many people confined into some limited region, then people need more options, to mitigate for being so dense.
If people live in tall buildings, natural airflow may not be enough, so there's more need for air conditioning
Natural gas, propane, or electricity is needed for clean cooking, because millions of cooking fires in huge cities, isn't healthy
pronatalist 2 months ago
@kemup
It's certainly possible, to have super-cities that are clean, beautiful, and healthy, but wouldn't you agree, they need proper trash collection? Doesn't that require transportation that works, cars, trucks, and such?
There's plenty of energy all around us, but to make it widely available and cheap enough for even the poor to afford it, until we get better technology, we need to develop ALL forms of energy that are economically viable, depending on region. Coal, oil, dams, nuclear
pronatalist 2 months ago
@kemup
I believe it's quite fine and benefits far more people, to welcome pops to be both huge and dense. Let the people spread out as much as they want or can, but some countries obviously don't have as much land as others do.
More pop is fine and wonderful. But more pop + more poverty, is not ideal. We have to let the technology level grow along with the expanding pop, for that's a huge part of the natural ADAPTATION process.
Technology increases benefit while reducing pollution.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@kemup
I meant that in big cities, to replace millions of smoky cooking fires burning trash, wood, coal, or dung, modern technology allows clean cooking, that is safer and more efficient, more controllable.
If there are millions of hungry mouths to feed, then of course there should be refrigerators, so people can plan ahead and have food for later. People should store up emergency rations of dried or canned foods, to cover for some inevitable power failures.
Build more power plants.
pronatalist 2 months ago
@kemup
Don't believe those anti-pop liars who say we can't have both huge pop and for more people to enjoy modern technology. Surely you can find other examples, how the modern technologies help allow the world to grow so populous, more comfortably and safely
What makes us so much "better" than people in China or India? If we can have cars, why can't they?
We can't keep growing, and do things the same old ways? What if we modernized some ways, in order to keep naturally growing denser?
pronatalist 2 months ago
Next military target : China and India
Nvidia9700MGT 2 months ago
We must be maximum at 1 billion
Nvidia9700MGT 2 months ago
I have had communications with "pronatalist" before. He is a religious nut who thinks everything is a "conspiracy" and he also wants to ban all voluntary contraception outright. Sending women back to being mere baby factories is pronatalists idea of sky fairy heaven.
phillips78 2 months ago
So some how the rate will change and in 88 years we will only gain 3 more billion that is 100k net per day when our current rate of growth is 230k net a day base on 2010 data sheet... not including exponential growth... the current modal shows around 12-15billion by 2100 when we can even support 7 let alone 6 billion... Good work NPR
Commanderxops 2 months ago
from this I get people started being really horny 200 years ago ?
printisoric 2 months ago 7
7 billion. lol that's nothing. All four countries in the UK have a total land mass of 243,610 square kilometers (If wiki is to be believed). Lets be conservative and say theres 200 billion square meters. Dividing that by 7 billion = 28.5 square meters for every individual on the planet. The house I live in occupys 39.1 square meters (if my floorplan is to be believed).
Not amazing amount of space I know let alone roads, parks, etc... but my point is that there is plenty of space for everyone.
mazk1985 2 months ago
@mazk1985 Sorry but the average UK citizen uses 5-6 bioproductive hectares to supply their needs, 28.5 square metres couldn't feed a rabbit, let alone a human long term.
phillips78 2 months ago
@phillips78 true but thats 28.5 sq m if everyone lived in the UK only. The UK is tiny compared to America, Russia and China so my point was that theres plenty of room on the planet. Hydroponics enables entire farms to fit in a single building and produces better food as well as being more tolerant to location. You can say this is a finite planet and it is true to a degree but the Sun pours energy onto us and its used by plants. This is a hugely abundant resource if used properly
mazk1985 2 months ago
@mazk1985 Sorry but I disagree witn you as do 58 national science academies. The world-average ecological footprint in 2007 was 2.7 global hectares per person (18.0 billion in total). With a world-average biocapacity of 1.8 global hectares per person (12 billion in total), this leads to an ecological deficit of 0.9 global hectares per person (6 billion in total). Don't forget that the majority of land on Earth is unfarmable. See the millennium ecosystem assessment for more info :)
phillips78 2 months ago
@phillips78 Thats why I said hydroponics is the future of farming because it can be built vertically and can be placed anywhere with sunlight. Your quite right though that farmland is very precious and thats partly due to our current paradigm of waste resources for profit. Just checked out the millennium ecosystem site and it's got members on its board of directors from organisations run by Bilderburger's. I don't think it can be completely trusted
mazk1985 2 months ago
@mazk1985 The millennium ecosystem assessment is a compilation of scientific data from 120 countries. It is supported by all the major scientific academies.
phillips78 2 months ago