As result of that I've said. The combat results must have been as follows:
USA-Kills: 3 Kfirs (the 3 by F-16s) and the Enemies-Kills: 1 C-130, 1 F-4 and 1 F-16 (the 3 by the Kfirs) At the end, the Kfirs and the americans retreat as result of DRAW. I'm saying this because the movie's dogfight scenes. But in longe range combat, the american-russian force win the battle using Amraams (F-16D) and Sparrows (F-4Es) against the Kfirs. At long range the combat is for the allies. At near distance don't.
I think the combats are very bad by these reasons:
1- One F-4 in the range of the Kfir is near to die. The Kfir is dogfighter (I mean Python omnidirectional missiles) and the F-4E is more specialized in long range kills.
2. The Kfir at long distance from the F-4 is near to die.
3. Yes, as in the movie, in climbing the F-16 is more than the Kfir, but in turning the Kfir is more. Also in maneuverability.
4. The combat between Kfirs and F-16s must have been a draw. Both planes are very same.
If you look at the bombers left wing at 2:19, you can definitely see something odd attached to it. This plane is not real. It looks like a model being railroaded by some machine under the camera.
@santoroyerdeantorcha You mean USA and Russia will join to make a precission attack strike team so they neutralize their nuclear weapons without causing civilian casualties?
@sparrowlt Well maybe not Russia but England, France, Israel, ect. Say I don't belive the world wants a nuclear Iran I prefer a joint assault on it's nuclear silos and civilian casualties than to see my beloved ones burnt. Do you?
@santoroyerdeantorcha Do you realice that having ICBM capacity is quite far from producing a nuclear warhead?
North Korea has nukes, but they are big and cumbersome and so far they cant adapt them to ICBMs so they are for now field weapons (short range or bombers).. and thats from a country that has had nukes for several years, Iran doesnt even have one yet , so its still far away from having missiles capable of reaching your beloved ones
@sparrowlt I know but are we going to wait untill they get one? Not just my beloved ones but yours too can get reached, I rather see an invasion to those braindwashed muslims than a Iran capable of killing everyone I know and so as you mister, my respects to your oppinion.Let me know if made a spelling mistake English is my second language.
iran isn't DUMB enough to launch a nuke attack on ANYONE for they would be decimated in a hearbeat by 30 countries. all it is is rhetoric by iran, kind of like the rhetoric the US spews. and anyway we're monitoring them.
@Ebb1993isimmortal There is no main villain, its only "Iran" (they never mention Iran but there is one shot of a map with the target location and its clearly on Iran) wanting to launch nuclear weapons to USA and URSS for no aparent reason.
@sparrowlt There's no leader of the hostile nation, it's just the nuclear facility? And what about the main villain of Aces: Iron Eagle III? I know it's a ex-nazi/drug lord/ace pilot, but what's his name?
@sparrowlt I see. But I know who the lead villain of Iron Eagle IV is. General Kettle and his men, the entire United States Air Force itself are the antagonists.
I am curious of how the Russian Bear and US B-52 were going to get past the SAMs to drop their bombs? They didn't have a fighter-bomber group come in before to take out the SAMs with Anti-Radiation Missiles, so how are the Bombers supposed to get through?
@djargus Depends on what type of SAM's they were. Both of those are high altitude bombers, and since they were protecting a canyon they would've used low to medium range SAM's.
Of course it's Hollywood, it doesn't have to make sense :P
@elboyi1986 ...I guess you could fly it but i thought all the radar/avionics and weapon systems were the RIO's responsibilty....however i wouldnt be surprised if there was a single seat variant made
iRON EAGLE 1 WAS a VERY GOOD RENDITION(ALLBIET) a ...low bodget film.....these recent copies are a mochery of good film making...maybe thats why Jason Gedric would rather do cameos with Donyy Walhberg
In IE4 Doug has flashbacks of the KGB interrogating him and torturing him (by privation of water or food) about the number of planes and details of US forces ..
Of course thats just a sorry excuse from the writers to justify why Doug was considered dead even by Chappy and why he dissapeared all along IE2 and IE3. Also acording to IE4 the KGB forgot about him when the URSS fell and only a senator found and freed him in the late 90s.
So, after the events of Iron Eagle II and Aces: Iron Eagle III (in which he was completely absent there), Doug was freed before the events of Iron Eagle IV?
See my video of the movie starting to see what "happens" with him
SPOILER:
.
.
.
.
He is "killed" after violating ruisan air space... in the 4th movie is revealed that he ejected and became prisioner of the KGB until released some years later
love these kind of movies but oe thing do is it posible to clim that fast in a f-4 i always tought those thing where crude and slugish but here it looks like its no problem or maybe i got it wrong
F-4s advantage was its raw power.. in Vietnam pilots used the power against MIG-17s flying in the vertical because they knew they couldnt outturn a MIG-17.. but they could outrun and outclimb quite much
Everybody complaining about the F-4' Phantoms posing as Mig-29's should realize that they did the same thing in Top Gun with F-5 Tigers posing as fictional Mig-28's.....be reasonable people, this film was made during the cold war when it wasn't exactly easy to get your hands on a Soviet built aircraft
Aparently thats not "easy" to understood to most of the people.. they seem to think that in 1986 to an american/canadian movie crew to get their hands on the MIG-29 was as easy as ask..
Funny also how almost nobody of they complains about the MIG-23 being Kfirs
@XXformula The flying scenes in Top Gun were done by real students (flying the f-14s) and real instructors (flying the F-5Es (MiG-28s)). Also it was made with the navy helping. This movie is also not realistic at all in terms of air combat and what goes on.
Ok.. then tell us.. how would you got a MIG-29 back in 1987.
Plus they only could film with the IAF wich had the following planes: F-4,F-15,F-16,Kfir and A-4
The F-15 would seem a better fit but maybe the IAF would be unwilling to lend their prime fighters to do a movie.
Its not a problem of money.. its a problem of being unable of use a model in a time..today probably it wouldnt be a problem to use a Fulcrum (in fact i have seen a Fulcrum pose as a F-16 in ground in a crapy IE footage ripoff)
I loved this movie when I was younger. Now, I can't help but wonder why they wouldn't secure air-space over the target BEFORE inserting the ground unit.
Anyhoo, I still like the nostalgia. Thanks for posting!
this is a busty video against an unknown Islamic country which is made by Bastered country of Israel, it is only fictious holly wood kiddy movie, i show oftenly this movie to my baby childs when they r ditrubbing their mom when she is busy during cookin or any home working... ha ha ha
I watched this movie a million times when I was a teenager. but now that i watch it i notice all the flaws and lack of continuity in the filming...what the hell is that on the left wing of that "B-52" at 2:19????
its so full of those kind of errors that i give up in counting them.
The sum was one of those crappy cable movies wich use scenes from IE wich showed them firing a sidewinder against a ground target and then a maverick against an enemy jet
Actually, if you´re talking about the plane´s guns, it´s real, they can be fired directly to the enemy when lock on but of course the gun´s direction range is not that big, and of course they don´t seek like a heat missile.
dont worry pal no matter how technology is dominant its always the MAN who controls the machine maybe we will definitely see some dogfights in IRAN or North korea hey armyman432 for u i suggest the O.I.C.W(objective individual combat weapon) Makes u feel like Rambo used by DELTA FORCE
and tis worse because this is extracted from a 4:3 version... this was a cinema movie... imagine how bad it must be in 16:9 in biiig-screen.. i can imagine the entire cinema ROFL
lol, the infamous f4 jet trail is even evident in best jet movie of all time, even though its the "mig29" in this movie, the f4 has got to be the sexiest jet of all time, regardless of its short commings.
I can't believe I used to love this movie when I was younger. It's terrible! Some of the worst one-liners I've ever heard..."Speek Kills, Peaches"...
At least the Russian chick is hot.
The worst mistake in this movie was to kill off Doug Masters in the first 5 minutes. It would be like killing off Luke Skywalker in 'Empire' or killing off John McClane in 'Die Hard 2'.
Spoiler. . . . . . . . . . . In Iron Eagle 4 is revealed that Doug was not killed, but captured by rusians.. dont know what is worst... killing him or resurecting him later... still the little references to IE1 and IE2 in IE4 are the only thing aceptable in the later
The 2 seater F-16 is due to reusing footage from Iron Eagle 1 wich used F-16Bs...
Naa, Iron Eagle 1 had worst editing even in movie continuity (at one point he sais he has 2 sidewinders left, he after fires one.. and after that he sais he has no more missiles left)
Top Gun also screwed up with loads.. Maverick at the end sais he has only one missile left and when he fires it you can see more under the Tomcat
thank you so much my friend
TheSkydancer28 1 day ago
now if you could just upload the part where cooper confronts the russians over shooting doug out of the sky..and the dinner with chappy
TheSkydancer28 3 weeks ago in playlist Iron Eagle 2
@TheSkydancer28 Just uploaded it now
sparrowlt 1 week ago
I can't believe I never made the connection between this and the "trench run" from Star Wars! Now that I notice, I can't believe I missed it.
MustangAce36Kills 1 month ago
Gota watch them right turns homeboy! LOL
planeflyer12 2 months ago
As result of that I've said. The combat results must have been as follows:
USA-Kills: 3 Kfirs (the 3 by F-16s) and the Enemies-Kills: 1 C-130, 1 F-4 and 1 F-16 (the 3 by the Kfirs) At the end, the Kfirs and the americans retreat as result of DRAW. I'm saying this because the movie's dogfight scenes. But in longe range combat, the american-russian force win the battle using Amraams (F-16D) and Sparrows (F-4Es) against the Kfirs. At long range the combat is for the allies. At near distance don't.
jeandemetz2009 5 months ago
I think the combats are very bad by these reasons:
1- One F-4 in the range of the Kfir is near to die. The Kfir is dogfighter (I mean Python omnidirectional missiles) and the F-4E is more specialized in long range kills.
2. The Kfir at long distance from the F-4 is near to die.
3. Yes, as in the movie, in climbing the F-16 is more than the Kfir, but in turning the Kfir is more. Also in maneuverability.
4. The combat between Kfirs and F-16s must have been a draw. Both planes are very same.
jeandemetz2009 5 months ago
This movie sucks without doug masters.
superveggito2000 5 months ago
why oh why can their voices not sound more convincing? =|
FilipinoZeroFighter 6 months ago
I love how you can see the hand of the prop guy moving the B-52...
taxman2056 7 months ago
@taxman2056 ha! thought thats what it was
ResQ198 5 months ago
cooper i cannot lose him.. did not even tried haha
RepaleoN 7 months ago
That must have been one helluva sidewinder
AandF1 8 months ago
acting is so bad
stynred 9 months ago in playlist Clips
Now that's some quality acting right there.
kerryberry1819 9 months ago
If you look at the bombers left wing at 2:19, you can definitely see something odd attached to it. This plane is not real. It looks like a model being railroaded by some machine under the camera.
Enforcerj79 11 months ago
2:18 look at the other wing one of the holders of the plane is bvisable
davvvvo 1 year ago
Any movie with a guy rolling down a stairwell on fire is OK in my book.
SpringfieldGarand 1 year ago
6:27 very strong eyes of zyenko! i love her!
ghostriderf8xzrr 1 year ago 3
2' 18" - look for the hand holding up the wing of the B52... nice touch.
TheMakel 1 year ago
2' 18" - look for the hand holding up the wing of the B52... nice touch.
TheMakel 1 year ago
same shit is going to happend to Iran in the future for sure.
santoroyerdeantorcha 1 year ago
@santoroyerdeantorcha You mean USA and Russia will join to make a precission attack strike team so they neutralize their nuclear weapons without causing civilian casualties?
You espect too much
sparrowlt 1 year ago
@sparrowlt Well maybe not Russia but England, France, Israel, ect. Say I don't belive the world wants a nuclear Iran I prefer a joint assault on it's nuclear silos and civilian casualties than to see my beloved ones burnt. Do you?
santoroyerdeantorcha 1 year ago 3
@santoroyerdeantorcha Do you realice that having ICBM capacity is quite far from producing a nuclear warhead?
North Korea has nukes, but they are big and cumbersome and so far they cant adapt them to ICBMs so they are for now field weapons (short range or bombers).. and thats from a country that has had nukes for several years, Iran doesnt even have one yet , so its still far away from having missiles capable of reaching your beloved ones
sparrowlt 1 year ago 2
@sparrowlt I know but are we going to wait untill they get one? Not just my beloved ones but yours too can get reached, I rather see an invasion to those braindwashed muslims than a Iran capable of killing everyone I know and so as you mister, my respects to your oppinion.Let me know if made a spelling mistake English is my second language.
santoroyerdeantorcha 1 year ago
@santoroyerdeantorcha
iran isn't DUMB enough to launch a nuke attack on ANYONE for they would be decimated in a hearbeat by 30 countries. all it is is rhetoric by iran, kind of like the rhetoric the US spews. and anyway we're monitoring them.
TeslaDRay 8 months ago
@BackBlocks09
Because they used Isreal's Air Force to make these movies
BTW, you left a craft load out of the last battle scene. It is not complete.
mawk27 1 year ago
How can one Maverick - or even the Russian equivalent - destroy a huge nuclear launch facility?
Amar7605 1 year ago
Comment removed
Amar7605 1 year ago
@aeroshark1 Yeah, I saw that. Maybe a jack of some kind. Gotta love low-budget 80s movies!
JPH1786 1 year ago
Lucky how that SAM didn't fuse as it flew past her canope.
santhony74 1 year ago
What happens to the main villain of this movie?
Ebb1993isimmortal 1 year ago
@Ebb1993isimmortal There is no main villain, its only "Iran" (they never mention Iran but there is one shot of a map with the target location and its clearly on Iran) wanting to launch nuclear weapons to USA and URSS for no aparent reason.
sparrowlt 1 year ago
@sparrowlt There's no leader of the hostile nation, it's just the nuclear facility? And what about the main villain of Aces: Iron Eagle III? I know it's a ex-nazi/drug lord/ace pilot, but what's his name?
Ebb1993isimmortal 1 year ago
@Ebb1993isimmortal Dunno.. i only watched IE3 once and i hate it , IE2 doesnt explain much.
sparrowlt 1 year ago
@sparrowlt I see. But I know who the lead villain of Iron Eagle IV is. General Kettle and his men, the entire United States Air Force itself are the antagonists.
Ebb1993isimmortal 1 year ago
@sparrowlt I also know about there being a mole in the government in Iron Eagle II. Do they get him?
Ebb1993isimmortal 1 year ago
I am curious of how the Russian Bear and US B-52 were going to get past the SAMs to drop their bombs? They didn't have a fighter-bomber group come in before to take out the SAMs with Anti-Radiation Missiles, so how are the Bombers supposed to get through?
djargus 1 year ago
@djargus Im more curious how a B-52 could fly from Ramstein in germany to Iran (about +4000kms ) in half hour or less
sparrowlt 1 year ago
@djargus Depends on what type of SAM's they were. Both of those are high altitude bombers, and since they were protecting a canyon they would've used low to medium range SAM's.
Of course it's Hollywood, it doesn't have to make sense :P
wildfire19861987 1 year ago
what are those people doing in front of computers at 7:10 isn't it obvious that the facility is gonna blow up?
neodelphi 1 year ago
Can you fly the f-4 phantom alone?
elboyi1986 2 years ago
@elboyi1986 ...I guess you could fly it but i thought all the radar/avionics and weapon systems were the RIO's responsibilty....however i wouldnt be surprised if there was a single seat variant made
SeargentBarnes 1 year ago
Comment removed
spacexploder 2 years ago
iRON EAGLE 1 WAS a VERY GOOD RENDITION(ALLBIET) a ...low bodget film.....these recent copies are a mochery of good film making...maybe thats why Jason Gedric would rather do cameos with Donyy Walhberg
SeargentBarnes 2 years ago
Okay, after Iron Eagle 1, 2, and 3, why did the KGB arrest Doug? He was only shot down...
Ebb1993willneverdie 2 years ago 2
In IE4 Doug has flashbacks of the KGB interrogating him and torturing him (by privation of water or food) about the number of planes and details of US forces ..
Of course thats just a sorry excuse from the writers to justify why Doug was considered dead even by Chappy and why he dissapeared all along IE2 and IE3. Also acording to IE4 the KGB forgot about him when the URSS fell and only a senator found and freed him in the late 90s.
Its patethic i know
sparrowlt 2 years ago
So, after the events of Iron Eagle II and Aces: Iron Eagle III (in which he was completely absent there), Doug was freed before the events of Iron Eagle IV?
Ebb1993willneverdie 2 years ago 2
cant find iron eagle 4 to watch not even on major sites al i find are trailers is doug alive? if yes coud you shaw a aprt of ti wher u see him eject
racsojong 2 years ago
SPOILER ALERT
.
.
.
Yes... he is alive in IE4 .. you cant see the ejection itself..but you see him descending on parachute and being arrested by russian policemen
sparrowlt 2 years ago
Where the fuck is Ted Masters? I'm not sure but did he get cut from the movie?
MeGoSwearAtYou 2 years ago
You mean Doug Masters?
sparrowlt 2 years ago
Lol, yeah. Forgot his name for a second there. Yeah, where did he go?
MeGoSwearAtYou 2 years ago
See my video of the movie starting to see what "happens" with him
SPOILER:
.
.
.
.
He is "killed" after violating ruisan air space... in the 4th movie is revealed that he ejected and became prisioner of the KGB until released some years later
sparrowlt 2 years ago
he dies in the first scene!!Im not joking!!Its doug masters!
kowtpr187 2 years ago
He was shot down in the beginning of the movie. He died
CoreyD1086 2 years ago
Actually in Iron Eagle IV it was revealed he survived and was captured by the KGB. He was released several years after and didnt return to the USAF.
phantomTomcat1985 2 years ago
love these kind of movies but oe thing do is it posible to clim that fast in a f-4 i always tought those thing where crude and slugish but here it looks like its no problem or maybe i got it wrong
grease509 2 years ago
F-4s advantage was its raw power.. in Vietnam pilots used the power against MIG-17s flying in the vertical because they knew they couldnt outturn a MIG-17.. but they could outrun and outclimb quite much
sparrowlt 2 years ago
I like how they look in each other eyes, while talking on the radio. :D
mrdizero 2 years ago
This movie was so much cooler when I was 8... man, that was cheesy
ResQ198 2 years ago 2
thats impossible even for a computer.
No its not its the bullseye wamprat back home they're not much bigger than 2m.
zenattack2000 2 years ago
omg george lucas musta directed this scene
zenattack2000 2 years ago
lol, gotta love 2:19 nice shot of the pylon holding up the model on it's port wing!
fireman257 2 years ago 2
HAHA.....never noticed that before...hehe good eye
blade80316 2 years ago
@fireman257 haha saw that too and thought lawl wtf...
Kekszbelow 1 year ago
AIM-9SIDEWINDER destroied the AAG!!
257411 2 years ago
whats the name of the music in this combat scenes?
bulldozercool 2 years ago
use the force, Luke
ancalites 2 years ago 13
I also love the SLOWEST Gatling guns EVER.
POW...........POW.........POW.....repeat. Yet Graves gets hit like 25 times.
Must've been shotgun rounds. :)
shawdawg28 2 years ago
Anyone notice the crane at the end of the B-52 wing?
shawdawg28 3 years ago
I did, I was wondering what that was lol i replayed that part at least 4 times!! XD
SNOOZE3091 2 years ago
that movie was recorded in israel
solimaniv 3 years ago
Ah the good ol' days before lame ass CGI.
backfire357 3 years ago 2
Everybody complaining about the F-4' Phantoms posing as Mig-29's should realize that they did the same thing in Top Gun with F-5 Tigers posing as fictional Mig-28's.....be reasonable people, this film was made during the cold war when it wasn't exactly easy to get your hands on a Soviet built aircraft
XXformula 3 years ago 7
Aparently thats not "easy" to understood to most of the people.. they seem to think that in 1986 to an american/canadian movie crew to get their hands on the MIG-29 was as easy as ask..
Funny also how almost nobody of they complains about the MIG-23 being Kfirs
sparrowlt 3 years ago
@XXformula The flying scenes in Top Gun were done by real students (flying the f-14s) and real instructors (flying the F-5Es (MiG-28s)). Also it was made with the navy helping. This movie is also not realistic at all in terms of air combat and what goes on.
jmaissel 5 months ago
Songs name?
Riktigkrigare 3 years ago
haha i understand "star wars" now lol
djdtec 3 years ago
this movie sucks haha
luigi322 3 years ago
Sorry I know it was a cheap movei but useing an F-4 Phantom as a MIG , COME ON !
Herbymac0811 3 years ago 2
Ok.. then tell us.. how would you got a MIG-29 back in 1987.
Plus they only could film with the IAF wich had the following planes: F-4,F-15,F-16,Kfir and A-4
The F-15 would seem a better fit but maybe the IAF would be unwilling to lend their prime fighters to do a movie.
Its not a problem of money.. its a problem of being unable of use a model in a time..today probably it wouldnt be a problem to use a Fulcrum (in fact i have seen a Fulcrum pose as a F-16 in ground in a crapy IE footage ripoff)
sparrowlt 3 years ago
if you look at 2:19 you can see that bomber is a modle being held by a strut lol
mobilesuitsteve03 3 years ago
LOL WOW all this time I never noticed that in the movie lol thanks for pointing that out
vamvp 3 years ago
i saw the b-52 flying in the scene there and jest before it changed scenes i saw a arm holding thwe wing tip of the left wing.generallee011
generallee011 3 years ago
can anyone tell me whats the name of the enemy planes chasing the f-4s?
federico353 3 years ago
In reality those are Israeli IAI Kfir C2 (or C7,same exterior) wich are developed from the Mirage 5
sparrowlt 3 years ago
I loved this movie when I was younger. Now, I can't help but wonder why they wouldn't secure air-space over the target BEFORE inserting the ground unit.
Anyhoo, I still like the nostalgia. Thanks for posting!
Kwaj 3 years ago
this is a busty video against an unknown Islamic country which is made by Bastered country of Israel, it is only fictious holly wood kiddy movie, i show oftenly this movie to my baby childs when they r ditrubbing their mom when she is busy during cookin or any home working... ha ha ha
Shadab420 3 years ago
"I've got one maverick left..."
Oh! But I very clearly see two of them on your aircraft. hee hee.
mbdelorenzo 3 years ago
Thats because hollywood takes you guys for idiots. Which is true for the most part.
Warpath2198 3 years ago
Have you actually used the "Audio preview" option before posting?
Because now comed to my mind certain online strip
sparrowlt 3 years ago
Let me put that in my little book of "I don't care".
Warpath2198 3 years ago
Let me put you in my list of "blocked users"
sparrowlt 3 years ago
I watched this movie a million times when I was a teenager. but now that i watch it i notice all the flaws and lack of continuity in the filming...what the hell is that on the left wing of that "B-52" at 2:19????
RellyOhBoy 3 years ago
good catch..
its so full of those kind of errors that i give up in counting them.
The sum was one of those crappy cable movies wich use scenes from IE wich showed them firing a sidewinder against a ground target and then a maverick against an enemy jet
sparrowlt 3 years ago
Great movie, Iron Eagle 2 rocks Red Dawn sucks
NickPatrick2 3 years ago
Actually, if you´re talking about the plane´s guns, it´s real, they can be fired directly to the enemy when lock on but of course the gun´s direction range is not that big, and of course they don´t seek like a heat missile.
aibanez34 3 years ago
As of today there is no single fighter with directional guns..
attack helicopters can track with the gun and some bombers/attack craft (AC-130) can , but no fighter can direct the gun as today.
If you know of one please tell
sparrowlt 3 years ago
LOL the guns have lock on ability thats freakin dumb
masteratC 3 years ago
LOL I never noticed before Soviet/Russian Phantoms eh? HA HA HA HA...I guess there is no reason for realism...HA HA HA
NovaScotiaNewfie 3 years ago
Sure you can b a Pilot But you wont be flying F-16s but F-22 Raptors of the U.S.A.F May ur dreams com true PATRIOT
actisac 3 years ago
you might not be flying F-22s just UAVs
Armyman432 3 years ago
dont worry pal no matter how technology is dominant its always the MAN who controls the machine maybe we will definitely see some dogfights in IRAN or North korea hey armyman432 for u i suggest the O.I.C.W(objective individual combat weapon) Makes u feel like Rambo used by DELTA FORCE
actisac 3 years ago
is that a hand or device holding up the B-52 at 2:20? Check out the left wingtip!!
Defender78 3 years ago
yes it is... and this is the 4:3 version..
dont think how noticable that is in the 16:9 version
sparrowlt 3 years ago
thanks captain obvious
sparrowlt 3 years ago
I think you got some of the aircraft identification wrong mate.
The only 3 makes of aircraft in the Iron Eagle movies, F-16's, F-4's (aka Russian Migs), & the Isreali Mirage's.
JOHNJ008 4 years ago
????? MIG ??????
ther is no on mig in the air
but
looks like the half israli airforce
SUPERCORVETTE 4 years ago
"Russian" F-4 Phantoms... F-4s were used against MiGs in Vietnam. Now, they are the MiGs...I've always enjoyed Hollywood irony.
tpmunyon 4 years ago
Same goes for the KFirs , they fought against alot of MIGs in israel and not they are too the Migs
sparrowlt 4 years ago
hahaa,., yes its true .. and in Top Gun .. Mig 28?? thats not even a plane ... in Top Gun we see the F-5... :)
kongerle 4 years ago
LOL, anyone else notice the clamp holding up the b52 by its wingtip at 2:19?
FleezleGizm 4 years ago
I did.. read the Comments & Responses ..
and tis worse because this is extracted from a 4:3 version... this was a cinema movie... imagine how bad it must be in 16:9 in biiig-screen.. i can imagine the entire cinema ROFL
sparrowlt 4 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!! You're right! lol
Ohgimmeabreakwillya 4 years ago
Yes! LOL! Damn funny!
aussiebear22 3 years ago
lol, the infamous f4 jet trail is even evident in best jet movie of all time, even though its the "mig29" in this movie, the f4 has got to be the sexiest jet of all time, regardless of its short commings.
mawk27 4 years ago
F-4 was quite a smoker..
sparrowlt 4 years ago
Cooper looks like a ninja!!!
jethrosesc 4 years ago
I can't believe I used to love this movie when I was younger. It's terrible! Some of the worst one-liners I've ever heard..."Speek Kills, Peaches"...
At least the Russian chick is hot.
The worst mistake in this movie was to kill off Doug Masters in the first 5 minutes. It would be like killing off Luke Skywalker in 'Empire' or killing off John McClane in 'Die Hard 2'.
ctmingusfan 4 years ago
sparrowlt 4 years ago
I find it funny that he fires an aim-9 sidewinder (short range air to air missle) at ground to air guns!!!
Hahahahahaahahahaha, maybe in real life the vulcan cannon or maverick would have been a better choice....
Hahahahaha and that hand was funny, GOD YOU GOT TO LOVE MOVIES!!!
ChristianNoskoff 4 years ago
Not only that, he fires the same sidewinder sometime later..
not to mention missiles keep dissapearing and appearing in the wings
sparrowlt 4 years ago
It is seriously the best and most thought out editing someone has ever done...
Not too mention the f4 takes off with no missles and the f16's had external fuel tanks...
And I think I saw a 2 seater f16 somewhere in one of these 2 fight scenes.
Hahaha, I wish they didnt kill off Jason Gedrick!!!
ChristianNoskoff 4 years ago
The 2 seater F-16 is due to reusing footage from Iron Eagle 1 wich used F-16Bs...
Naa, Iron Eagle 1 had worst editing even in movie continuity (at one point he sais he has 2 sidewinders left, he after fires one.. and after that he sais he has no more missiles left)
Top Gun also screwed up with loads.. Maverick at the end sais he has only one missile left and when he fires it you can see more under the Tomcat
sparrowlt 4 years ago
Hahahaahaha so very entertaining though...
I havent seen the whole of iron eagle 2, what happens and IRON EAGLE 3 IS THE WORST OF THEM ALL!!!
ChristianNoskoff 4 years ago
there is a 4 and doug is in it
kevinadair1 4 years ago
I know this and I have seen 4, however they get some other burnt out chump too play him...
FUCKING GAY, BRING ON GEDRICK!!!
ChristianNoskoff 4 years ago
nope... full vid is 14min, i tried to trim it cutting non-esential pieces but couldnt get it under 12min, Youtube limits vids to 10min
sparrowlt 4 years ago
Blooper visible: Look at 2:18, you can see a hand holding the B-52 model, hahahaha
sparrowlt 4 years ago