Coming back to the water problem. Life started off in muddy ponds of boiling water as far as evolution is concerned. If the planet was hotter and ice comets did hit the plant why wouldn't they evaporate on entry? Also how much water would it take and at what rate would it take to cool the planet. Important trying to believe this theory but i have to use my imagination
@justwanttocomment13 - thanks for your comments. The problem with this theory also lies with other planets in our solar system eg Jupiter. Jupiter is 1300 x bigger than earth but is mainly gas intact it may have no core. Any theory using model would have any 'collected' gas get sucked into the sun.
You have a valid point about the position of the earth in relation to the sun however it is not sufficient enough considering the sun makes up more than 97% of the mass in the solar system. As for the age of the earth do you believe in the magnetic reversals theory which supposes that 100% of the magnetic field did not lose energy. I'm just wondering how far you have to stretch the imagination to fit in your your science fiction beliefs
@MrBpigz - the red shift problem refutes the universe age theory problem. Also I see no demonstrative proof or explanation to explain why does earth have water, why don't other planets have it? Hell if comets hit the earth with ice, then the moon and every other planet should be pretty wet. I don't oppose this idea I just struggle to find proof.
@ndog37 Earth is close enough so that the water won't freeze and far enough so that it won't be a be completely dry. Again this is information that you can learn in an elementary school science class. Also your explanation for a young 6000 year old earth has been refuted in an article title "Debunking Robert Gentry's
"New Redshift Interpretation" Cosmology". Google it and you can easily find it online. If you don't understand science then read an actual science book rather than arguing here.
@batistaker123 - so give me your "basic" reasoning of how water appeared/formed/got there. It is a joke for water to have come from space, which we can agree on. However to state that some funky chemical reaction made it happen.. you sure have a LOT of belief/faith in some strange ideas
@ndog37 Really? Comets/Asteroids are frozen chunks of debris and can contain frozen water. Also water exist in gas clouds all over the universe(There are other things beside our solar system out there). Our solar system had to have had water in some form obviously. Asteroids containing water have been and still are flying about in our solar system. So yes it "floated" here...Just not magically. I thought it was common knowledge that water exist in space.
@ndog37 "Funky" chemical reaction? Holy hell bud - do some research on a subject before making assertions about something you obviously know nothing about. Throw in an introductory chemistry course while you're at it.
@ndog37 If you read my reasoning on your previous comment below you can see how different particles went to different planets. By your logic all the matter that makes up our universe should all be in the sun because it is the heaviest. Since this is clearly not the case you are wrong. There is little faith involved in science, only the hesitant acceptance of the hypotheses that are not disproved when tested against nature.
I don't see the conflict between religion and science. Why is it so hard to accept that God made all these incredible things happen? People don't make up science. We mearly observe the rules and principles that God has laid down in creation. People in the 400's were kind of dumb when they said God created the universe 6000 years ago or whatever they thought. Sorry the physics pf space and evolution by genetic natural selection are confusing, it doesn't make them any less real.
@justwanttocomment13 Well said. I am Atheist but I don't go around trying to insult those who are religious. Why insist on insulting each others beliefs? Furthermore I will admit I may be wrong. God may have made all of this happen. If I'm wrong and I find myself facing St.Peter I will say "My bad, Who do I talk to about reserving some beach front property on the lake of fire, an AC unit and a shotgun to shoot Hitler over and over again. "
@justwanttocomment13 You say people don't accept God as if it is something they "should" do. I disagree with that. There are so many issues with the whole idea of God, and merely the fact that Christianity still teaches the Earth was created in a week by some invisible being the no one can see, yet we should worship unconditionally? The fact that people still believe that causes so much frustration for people who want a mentally advanced society. There is simply no evidence to support you
@danieljohn426 I don't know if you actually read what I said. I neither advocated for the acceptance of God in the imperative form you claim nor did I even use the word Christianity once. I was merely pointing out that none of the scientific explanations of the natural world scientists agree upon today are inconsistent with the idea of an omnipotent creator.
@danieljohn426 I was implying that if there is a God (seeing as the target of my message was people who do not "believe" in evolution, clearly, if you actually understand english) there is nothing to suggest that (s)he didn't instill evolution as a natural law of earth. Please actually read what I said instead of just finding the first verb associated with the word God and then shit your pants. Good day to you.
@justwanttocomment13 "Why is it so hard to accept that God made all these incredible things happen?" You used God with a capital G. Christianity's god. What you said connotated to Christianity. Your target was not to people who don't believe in evolution, and if it was, you did an awful job portraying that. And I merely stated I disagree with what you had to say. I apologize for thinking that I could actually have an intellectual conversation with someone over the internet.
@danieljohn426 I'm not sure if you have heard of the rules of grammar Mr. Genius. The word God (whether Jewish, Christian or Allah for our Muslin friends) is what us dumb people call a proper noun and therefore the word must be capitalized regardless of one's beliefs. Given that I began my post by attempting to reconcile religion and science I think its pretty obvious to everyone else that I was trying to bring fundamentalists into the modern world where science isn't the opposite of faith.
@danieljohn426 and fyi I'm not even a Christian so seems like you kind of just assumed that...got a little pent up anger in you buddy? Try pot it helps.
Also how do you explain how all the water got from space to the planet? It magically floated here? Missing the sun? Which is only 97% of the solar system mass. Man you believe some funky stuff
@ndog37 Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen it did not "magically float into the planet". If you don't have a basic understanding of chemistry then please don't try and act like you know what you are talking about.
@ndog37 I would like to point out that there is a shit ton more hydrogen on the sun than is on earth. (Like much much more, probably about the proportion equal to the difference in gravitational pull of each planet (this is Newton's law btw)) So in reality your claim has some ground. You miss the fact that gravity is not a zero sum game (as in all mass doesn't just go to the heaviest thing automatically) and some of it clearly did attach itself to the planet we now call earth.
This video is a nothing more than science fiction the product of a high school fantasy gone too far. If our universe is really 13billion years old surely there would be still stars forming? Ah no. There is not a single star observed to be forming.
@ndog37 If the world was 6k-10k years old, light from very distant starts that we know of would not be visible, due to the amount of time it takes light to reach a given point.
@ndog37 That is because light takes time to travel. We may not have witnessed stars forming but we have witnessed supernovas. The problem is that the ones we see today happened thousands or maybe millions of years ago. Because our eyes only function if there is light to reflect, and light takes time to travel, and all stars (except the sun) are hundreds of millions of miles away it is nearly impossible to observe these processes. I really think you should look up indirect experimentation.
@kibdara He doesn't answer what his religious views are and I think it's best that way. If he were in fact an atheist I feel that many Americans would be offended by this and stop watching his videos just because America is extremely religious when compared to the rest of the developed world.
Guys, not having all the answers isn't a reason to dismiss the ones we do have. Ants don't have all the answers either and our size relative to the universe is even smaller :)
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the relatively short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
@Big1Poe When you're asking questions about things like the big bang it's important to remember that physics is a very strange and unintuitive field of study. There are many things which completely defy common sense, and yet they are verifiable by experiment.
At the moment of the big bang matter-energy spontaneously created itself, possibly from virtual particles. Virtual particles are known to pop in and out of existence as demonstrated in lab experiments.
"Oh, look. I can generalize a whole group of people by calling them names. It doesn't make me any less wrong or them any less correct, but I'm definitely confident in saying it anyway. That is all."
@Npowell01 *sigh*, another egotistical Atheist approaches, listen asshole, I came to this video to learn shit, not debate religion. All I'm sick of is you dicks always shoving your thoughts on religion down EVERYONE'S throat and dancing around saying "ZOMG LAWL IM AN ATHEIST I AM LIEK SOOO SUPERIOR TO ALL UV YOOO YOU ALL HAVE TO BOW TO MEHHH".
I'm not egotistical, and I rarely mention my Atheism anywhere outside of the internet, because if I do about nine people will scold me about how I'm going to hell.
But thanks for using the usual insults on me. My problem isn't with people who believe in God so much as people who cling to a SPECIFIC organized religion, are COMPLETELY CONFIDENT that it's the right one just because their parents and community told them so.
I never shove my thoughts down anyone's throat. I merely put them out there, just like you're putting out that you think I'm an asshole for not being you.
I work at a grocery store, I never see Atheist pamphlets getting handed out, nor do little old ladies ever ask me if I've been using my powers of skepticism.
However, people regularly ask me if I've been saved by Christ.
I merely nod my head "yes" to them and smile, because if I don't they freak.
This is my final comment of three, if you actually care to read through them all. your option. It's not getting shoved down your throat.
I'm very tolerant of and am in fact friends with many people who believe in a God of some form, especially those who are creative enough to come up with their own conception of God rather than simply inherit it from their folks.
@iwannabethekid34x You suck Jesus' magical dick don't you? lol. Does it cover your face with fairy dust and do unicorns magically form from said fairy dust?
@iwannabethekid34x Whoa whoa whoa, chill thy tits broseph. No need for such bad words. I'm pretty sure mommy and Jesus wouldn't approve of it. I thought Jesus wants everyone to love each other. You're going to make him angry :(
I thought Sal could be considered an intellectual that someone can look up to and learn from but i guess not. What he is saying here is not science. Science must be able to be demonstrated and duplicated. No matter what anybody tells you there is 0 evidence for anything said on this video and nor will there ever be. It is strictly imagination from "scientists" that refuse to believe in an intelligent designer.
First off, it's "Atheist;" it's an exception to the "i before e" rule. Second, "Atheist" is singular, not plural. What you said is the equivalent of saying "all these cat" as in, "All these cat can haz cheeseburger."
The Westboro Baptist church are ignorant and hateful.
Muslim Jihadists are ignorant and hateful.
The actions of Jewish Warriors described in the Old Testament are ignorant and hateful.
Wanting the world to become educated? Wanting them to realize they're completely mortal? Wanting the human race to transcend their illusions so we can finally work together as a unit and stop having stupid wars based on imaginary friends and imaginary lines in the ground?
i think the thoery that u explained at the start is not true to the extend of my knowledge because i believe in the formation of solar system due to crash between shooting star and sun.
i think the thoery that u explained at the start is not true to the extend of my knowledge because i believe in the formation of solar system due to crash between shooting star and sun
To be Islamic or Religious, Quran has 1400 years back told in itself how the Earth came into being. Anyhow, the try of science to find out how it came into being is still appreciable but not true. =) Hope you people were Muslim and you would get to know the truth and agree with me... !!!
"You can imagine" sadly, not all that well :( A molten ball of that size, colliding with another one of those things... How do we go about imagining that at that scale? Those balls are larger than the moon. I want to imagine but it's really hard :p Great video.
I freely admit my ignorance... Watching this video, random thought came to mind... in free fall, does acceleration occur due to an increase in gravitational force the closer you get to the earth/center.. :S I guess I can do quick bit of browsing.. cuz that would mean you weighed less the higher you got, and that's absurd.. *facepalm*
@xESOTERlC You accelerate faster as you fall toward the earth, but not the center of it. If you could be at the direct center, you would be apparently weightless. The more you go inside the earth, the less force due to gravity you experience.
@oexnorth No no... I realize that ^^ I attached "center" so it would be understood that I didn't just think that gravity was pulling me towards the ground. Now, you are saying, though, that if I dug a hole 1/2/10/20 miles deep that I would at least accelerate less? o.O Also, that's supposing you could hollow out the center of the earth instantaneously/magically so that I could float there..
Anyway, neither here nor there :P Doesn't correlate with my initial inquiry
@xESOTERlC Force between two objects is Force=G*(mass of object 1)*(massof object 2)/(distance between two objects squared) G is a constant, so the only way to lessen the gravitational force between two objects is to either take mass away from one object or the other, or two put more distance between the two objects. Also remember, Force=(mass)*(acceleration), or (acceleration)=(Force)/(mass). If the force remains constant and mass is increases, acceleration becomes less.
@oexnorth Hm. So my first question was right? Acceleration in freefall occurs due to an increase in gravitational force?
Your last part is skewed. if F=MA, then yes--A=F/M.. That is NOT saying that if(magically) the mass of something increases during freefall, the acceleration will decrease. Instead, it is just showing the correlation between the 3. So that if you know the force of an impact of freefall, you can equate its acceleration based on its mass
I'm saying that the assertion "if the force remains constant and mass is increased, acceleration becomes less" is not an accurate one based on f=ma ~ a=f/m
Or will you tell me that if you jump out of a plane with someone else.. and halfway towards the earth you join together.. that your acceleration will decrease just because the mass just increased?
@xESOTERlC Actually, that's exactly what A=F/M is saying. If you divide a constant by a larger and larger number, what happens to the value? It gets smaller and smaller. Divide 1/10, then divide 1/100, what happens, the value gets smaller. Same thing here.
@oexnorth well, it's more complicated than that.. the force WOULDN'T stay the same because you'd be adding mass. A falling object would not decelerate because you added mass to it
@xESOTERlC I'm just speaking in strictly theoretical terms. If F remains constant and mass increases, then yes, acceleration would decrease. Of course, in actual circumstances, if you added mass, then you would change the force due to gravity, and then acceleration would actually increase because in the gravitational equation mass is in the numerator. Again, I was just saying IF force could remain constant.
@xESOTERlC Not only would you weigh less the further away from the center of gravity you get, your feet at this very moment weigh less than your head if you are standing, but the difference is so miniscule that you don't notice it.
@bevon17 i dnt believe that god made the earth, i dnt believe that he brought animals here, i dnt think all that is bullshit.. i just think that is not true......
@OhMyGoddlessGamer ohhh no, thats not what I meant. It was more about the fact, that theories are true as long as nobody proved them wrong (falsification) and therefore one shoudn't sound to absolutistic about how the world works out. That's the open-minded thought I was talking about ;)
@reik2006: “The fact, that theories are true as long as nobody proved them wrong (falsification)” — Oh really...? Lol, so the theory that elves exist on Neptune is true as long as nobody proves it wrong? “That's the open-minded thought I was talking about ;) — Mm… right.. makes sense.
@MarvelsofaLifetime I admit you're right. The theories are not true, they are just valid. People can look for elves on Neptune (it's a finite place) and tell you there aren't any (.. at least that's what I expect to happen). If you say on the other hand, that there are elves somewhere out there, it's neither a valid theory and of course nor a true one (you have to look anywhere, which is impossible). Thank you for pointing out my careless use of words and the contradictions.
@MarvelsofaLifetime and by nor a true one I'm not saying that there are no evles out there ... there well could be elves :P but as far as I know theres no evidence for them
Coming back to the water problem. Life started off in muddy ponds of boiling water as far as evolution is concerned. If the planet was hotter and ice comets did hit the plant why wouldn't they evaporate on entry? Also how much water would it take and at what rate would it take to cool the planet. Important trying to believe this theory but i have to use my imagination
ndog37 1 day ago
@justwanttocomment13 - thanks for your comments. The problem with this theory also lies with other planets in our solar system eg Jupiter. Jupiter is 1300 x bigger than earth but is mainly gas intact it may have no core. Any theory using model would have any 'collected' gas get sucked into the sun.
ndog37 1 day ago
Comment removed
danieljohn426 1 week ago
You have a valid point about the position of the earth in relation to the sun however it is not sufficient enough considering the sun makes up more than 97% of the mass in the solar system. As for the age of the earth do you believe in the magnetic reversals theory which supposes that 100% of the magnetic field did not lose energy. I'm just wondering how far you have to stretch the imagination to fit in your your science fiction beliefs
ndog37 2 weeks ago
@MrBpigz - the red shift problem refutes the universe age theory problem. Also I see no demonstrative proof or explanation to explain why does earth have water, why don't other planets have it? Hell if comets hit the earth with ice, then the moon and every other planet should be pretty wet. I don't oppose this idea I just struggle to find proof.
ndog37 2 weeks ago
@ndog37 Earth is close enough so that the water won't freeze and far enough so that it won't be a be completely dry. Again this is information that you can learn in an elementary school science class. Also your explanation for a young 6000 year old earth has been refuted in an article title "Debunking Robert Gentry's
"New Redshift Interpretation" Cosmology". Google it and you can easily find it online. If you don't understand science then read an actual science book rather than arguing here.
batistaker123 2 weeks ago
@batistaker123 - so give me your "basic" reasoning of how water appeared/formed/got there. It is a joke for water to have come from space, which we can agree on. However to state that some funky chemical reaction made it happen.. you sure have a LOT of belief/faith in some strange ideas
ndog37 3 weeks ago
@ndog37 Really? Comets/Asteroids are frozen chunks of debris and can contain frozen water. Also water exist in gas clouds all over the universe(There are other things beside our solar system out there). Our solar system had to have had water in some form obviously. Asteroids containing water have been and still are flying about in our solar system. So yes it "floated" here...Just not magically. I thought it was common knowledge that water exist in space.
EmbracingMyInsanity 3 weeks ago
@ndog37 "Funky" chemical reaction? Holy hell bud - do some research on a subject before making assertions about something you obviously know nothing about. Throw in an introductory chemistry course while you're at it.
MrBpigz 2 weeks ago
@ndog37 If you read my reasoning on your previous comment below you can see how different particles went to different planets. By your logic all the matter that makes up our universe should all be in the sun because it is the heaviest. Since this is clearly not the case you are wrong. There is little faith involved in science, only the hesitant acceptance of the hypotheses that are not disproved when tested against nature.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
I don't see the conflict between religion and science. Why is it so hard to accept that God made all these incredible things happen? People don't make up science. We mearly observe the rules and principles that God has laid down in creation. People in the 400's were kind of dumb when they said God created the universe 6000 years ago or whatever they thought. Sorry the physics pf space and evolution by genetic natural selection are confusing, it doesn't make them any less real.
justwanttocomment13 4 weeks ago
@justwanttocomment13 of*
justwanttocomment13 4 weeks ago
@justwanttocomment13 Well said. I am Atheist but I don't go around trying to insult those who are religious. Why insist on insulting each others beliefs? Furthermore I will admit I may be wrong. God may have made all of this happen. If I'm wrong and I find myself facing St.Peter I will say "My bad, Who do I talk to about reserving some beach front property on the lake of fire, an AC unit and a shotgun to shoot Hitler over and over again. "
EmbracingMyInsanity 3 weeks ago
@EmbracingMyInsanity Thanks for the compliment. I like your spunk
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
@justwanttocomment13 You say people don't accept God as if it is something they "should" do. I disagree with that. There are so many issues with the whole idea of God, and merely the fact that Christianity still teaches the Earth was created in a week by some invisible being the no one can see, yet we should worship unconditionally? The fact that people still believe that causes so much frustration for people who want a mentally advanced society. There is simply no evidence to support you
danieljohn426 1 week ago
@danieljohn426 I don't know if you actually read what I said. I neither advocated for the acceptance of God in the imperative form you claim nor did I even use the word Christianity once. I was merely pointing out that none of the scientific explanations of the natural world scientists agree upon today are inconsistent with the idea of an omnipotent creator.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
@danieljohn426 I was implying that if there is a God (seeing as the target of my message was people who do not "believe" in evolution, clearly, if you actually understand english) there is nothing to suggest that (s)he didn't instill evolution as a natural law of earth. Please actually read what I said instead of just finding the first verb associated with the word God and then shit your pants. Good day to you.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
@justwanttocomment13 "Why is it so hard to accept that God made all these incredible things happen?" You used God with a capital G. Christianity's god. What you said connotated to Christianity. Your target was not to people who don't believe in evolution, and if it was, you did an awful job portraying that. And I merely stated I disagree with what you had to say. I apologize for thinking that I could actually have an intellectual conversation with someone over the internet.
danieljohn426 1 day ago
@danieljohn426 I'm not sure if you have heard of the rules of grammar Mr. Genius. The word God (whether Jewish, Christian or Allah for our Muslin friends) is what us dumb people call a proper noun and therefore the word must be capitalized regardless of one's beliefs. Given that I began my post by attempting to reconcile religion and science I think its pretty obvious to everyone else that I was trying to bring fundamentalists into the modern world where science isn't the opposite of faith.
justwanttocomment13 1 day ago
@justwanttocomment13 Try learning more about religion before you start spouting out about it, hm?
danieljohn426 19 hours ago
@danieljohn426 and fyi I'm not even a Christian so seems like you kind of just assumed that...got a little pent up anger in you buddy? Try pot it helps.
justwanttocomment13 1 day ago
Comment removed
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
Also how do you explain how all the water got from space to the planet? It magically floated here? Missing the sun? Which is only 97% of the solar system mass. Man you believe some funky stuff
ndog37 1 month ago
@ndog37 Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen it did not "magically float into the planet". If you don't have a basic understanding of chemistry then please don't try and act like you know what you are talking about.
batistaker123 3 weeks ago
@ndog37 I would like to point out that there is a shit ton more hydrogen on the sun than is on earth. (Like much much more, probably about the proportion equal to the difference in gravitational pull of each planet (this is Newton's law btw)) So in reality your claim has some ground. You miss the fact that gravity is not a zero sum game (as in all mass doesn't just go to the heaviest thing automatically) and some of it clearly did attach itself to the planet we now call earth.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
@ndog37 no one believes this, its been observed using the process of indirect experimentation.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
This video is a nothing more than science fiction the product of a high school fantasy gone too far. If our universe is really 13billion years old surely there would be still stars forming? Ah no. There is not a single star observed to be forming.
ndog37 1 month ago
@ndog37 If the world was 6k-10k years old, light from very distant starts that we know of would not be visible, due to the amount of time it takes light to reach a given point.
MrBpigz 2 weeks ago
@ndog37 That is because light takes time to travel. We may not have witnessed stars forming but we have witnessed supernovas. The problem is that the ones we see today happened thousands or maybe millions of years ago. Because our eyes only function if there is light to reflect, and light takes time to travel, and all stars (except the sun) are hundreds of millions of miles away it is nearly impossible to observe these processes. I really think you should look up indirect experimentation.
justwanttocomment13 2 days ago
he is super smart. but i have a question. is he religious or a beliver of science
kibdara 1 month ago
@kibdara He doesn't answer what his religious views are and I think it's best that way. If he were in fact an atheist I feel that many Americans would be offended by this and stop watching his videos just because America is extremely religious when compared to the rest of the developed world.
batistaker123 3 weeks ago
@batistaker123 Which is one of many reasons why I want to emigrate to another country.
EmbracingMyInsanity 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys, not having all the answers isn't a reason to dismiss the ones we do have. Ants don't have all the answers either and our size relative to the universe is even smaller :)
jaysbrain 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the relatively short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
jaysbrain 1 month ago
Comment removed
jaysbrain 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
jaysbrain 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm proud of how much we've learned about ourselves in the short time that say, bipedal species have been on the earth. There are so many sophisticated processes that happened before me just so I could type this and head back to playing video games. Thank you scientists!
jaysbrain 1 month ago
Comment removed
jaysbrain 1 month ago
Comment removed
jaysbrain 1 month ago
Comment removed
jaysbrain 1 month ago
Comment removed
jaysbrain 1 month ago
this has no relation to anything that i am doing in school, I watched because it is damn interesting
Pricee123 3 months ago
Where did the matter come from for the "big bang" to occur?
It cannot 'just be there'.
Big1Poe 3 months ago
@Big1Poe When you're asking questions about things like the big bang it's important to remember that physics is a very strange and unintuitive field of study. There are many things which completely defy common sense, and yet they are verifiable by experiment.
At the moment of the big bang matter-energy spontaneously created itself, possibly from virtual particles. Virtual particles are known to pop in and out of existence as demonstrated in lab experiments.
vicksoma 2 months ago
The man on the video is basing everything on assuming....Why does he not just say hew I do not know any more than anyone else
wv8bu 2 months ago
@Big1Poe
Where did the "God" who created the matter in the "big bang" come from?
He cannot 'just be there'.
Npowell01 2 months ago
The Hadean means "The Age of Hell"
MrEricForbes 3 months ago
Arrogant dickhead Atheists, that is all.
iwannabethekid34x 3 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x
"Oh, look. I can generalize a whole group of people by calling them names. It doesn't make me any less wrong or them any less correct, but I'm definitely confident in saying it anyway. That is all."
That's not arrogant?
Npowell01 2 months ago
@Npowell01 *sigh*, another egotistical Atheist approaches, listen asshole, I came to this video to learn shit, not debate religion. All I'm sick of is you dicks always shoving your thoughts on religion down EVERYONE'S throat and dancing around saying "ZOMG LAWL IM AN ATHEIST I AM LIEK SOOO SUPERIOR TO ALL UV YOOO YOU ALL HAVE TO BOW TO MEHHH".
iwannabethekid34x 2 months ago
@iwannabethekid34x
I'm not egotistical, and I rarely mention my Atheism anywhere outside of the internet, because if I do about nine people will scold me about how I'm going to hell.
But thanks for using the usual insults on me. My problem isn't with people who believe in God so much as people who cling to a SPECIFIC organized religion, are COMPLETELY CONFIDENT that it's the right one just because their parents and community told them so.
Please point out where I said I was superior.
cont.
Npowell01 1 month ago
@iwannabethekid34x
cont.
I never shove my thoughts down anyone's throat. I merely put them out there, just like you're putting out that you think I'm an asshole for not being you.
I work at a grocery store, I never see Atheist pamphlets getting handed out, nor do little old ladies ever ask me if I've been using my powers of skepticism.
However, people regularly ask me if I've been saved by Christ.
I merely nod my head "yes" to them and smile, because if I don't they freak.
Just like you.
Npowell01 1 month ago
@iwannabethekid34x
cont.
This is my final comment of three, if you actually care to read through them all. your option. It's not getting shoved down your throat.
I'm very tolerant of and am in fact friends with many people who believe in a God of some form, especially those who are creative enough to come up with their own conception of God rather than simply inherit it from their folks.
"Now do what Jesus says or you burn forever."
"Yes mommy."
The thinking ends there for most.
Npowell01 1 month ago
@iwannabethekid34x You suck Jesus' magical dick don't you? lol. Does it cover your face with fairy dust and do unicorns magically form from said fairy dust?
EpicHaxThriller 1 month ago
@EpicHaxThriller And so another egotistical Atheist approaches. You're not worth my arguments, seeing as how your maturity is that a fucking 9yr old.
You are an ignorant and arrogant fool.
And thus not worth any more key strokes than these.
Here's my invisible fuck, take it.
iwannabethekid34x 1 month ago
@iwannabethekid34x Whoa whoa whoa, chill thy tits broseph. No need for such bad words. I'm pretty sure mommy and Jesus wouldn't approve of it. I thought Jesus wants everyone to love each other. You're going to make him angry :(
EpicHaxThriller 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought Sal could be considered an intellectual that someone can look up to and learn from but i guess not. What he is saying here is not science. Science must be able to be demonstrated and duplicated. No matter what anybody tells you there is 0 evidence for anything said on this video and nor will there ever be. It is strictly imagination from "scientists" that refuse to believe in an intelligent designer.
JudeAballer 3 months ago
@JudeAballer, Yep, I'm also one that refuses to believe in fairy tales.
LloydChristmas777 2 months ago
don't think the bible was meant to be taken literally o_O i mean, to each their own interpretation, I guess
emergencylipstick 4 months ago
@emergencylipstick If not to be taken literally, then why have such a strong belief in it?
MrBazingafy 3 months ago
Next Lesson BIBLE - CREATION. thank you!
geejhay25 4 months ago
@geejhay25 This series is about science, not folk lore.
Towelfalafel 4 months ago 3
Comment removed
frogcannon 4 months ago
@frogcannon "all these athiest"
First off, it's "Atheist;" it's an exception to the "i before e" rule. Second, "Atheist" is singular, not plural. What you said is the equivalent of saying "all these cat" as in, "All these cat can haz cheeseburger."
Towelfalafel 4 months ago 10
@frogcannon You're the ignorant one, you can't even spell or use grammar correctly.
Jezebel333 2 months ago
@frogcannon
The Westboro Baptist church are ignorant and hateful.
Muslim Jihadists are ignorant and hateful.
The actions of Jewish Warriors described in the Old Testament are ignorant and hateful.
Wanting the world to become educated? Wanting them to realize they're completely mortal? Wanting the human race to transcend their illusions so we can finally work together as a unit and stop having stupid wars based on imaginary friends and imaginary lines in the ground?
I'm sooo hateful.
Npowell01 1 month ago
Astronomy and Physics = FUCK YEAH!
CBBalthazar 4 months ago 19
@CBBalthazar LMAO Nicely said my friend.
EmbracingMyInsanity 3 weeks ago
NO GOD! move on.....
heavypizza 6 months ago
i think the thoery that u explained at the start is not true to the extend of my knowledge because i believe in the formation of solar system due to crash between shooting star and sun.
shivakumar00740 8 months ago
@shivakumar00740 Cool story bro
TheAppleShampoo182 6 months ago
i think the thoery that u explained at the start is not true to the extend of my knowledge because i believe in the formation of solar system due to crash between shooting star and sun
shivakumar00740 8 months ago
@shivakumar00740 How so?...
MisterSurr 3 months ago
I.e. longer than 7 days.
tIs4gatorbait 10 months ago
a negative vote? Kent Hovind must have been here.
MoonKittenJD 1 year ago
@MoonKittenJD whos that?
ChenJunHung 1 year ago
@ChenJunHung lol check out the why do people laugh at creationists serious and you will find out =)
MoonKittenJD 1 year ago
@MoonKittenJD thats such a long ass series, i gave up!!!! XD
ChenJunHung 1 year ago
@ChenJunHung the first 5 or 10 are the ones with hovind in them lol(trust me they are worth it to watch though if you have time)
MoonKittenJD 1 year ago
You are just amazing to listen to! Thank you so much!
TheStarMoon555 1 year ago
YES YES YES geological times YESSSS PLEASE MOAR
rushianokun 1 year ago
Where did the supernova come from?
simpleejoe 1 year ago
Is this on iTunes?
EatUrVeggies94 1 year ago
Something about you saying "molten ball", makes me chuckle. Idk why. LOL. Great video anyways..
MEPIX1 1 year ago
I've never seen any evidence that Theia impacted the Earth. The Moon could have simply been captured in Earth's orbit.
Mal1234567 1 year ago
To be Islamic or Religious, Quran has 1400 years back told in itself how the Earth came into being. Anyhow, the try of science to find out how it came into being is still appreciable but not true. =) Hope you people were Muslim and you would get to know the truth and agree with me... !!!
SilencerBlood 1 year ago
"You can imagine" sadly, not all that well :( A molten ball of that size, colliding with another one of those things... How do we go about imagining that at that scale? Those balls are larger than the moon. I want to imagine but it's really hard :p Great video.
FHomeBrew 1 year ago
Very very interesting video. You certainly have a way with presenting information Mr Khan!
LAnonHubbard 1 year ago
I freely admit my ignorance... Watching this video, random thought came to mind... in free fall, does acceleration occur due to an increase in gravitational force the closer you get to the earth/center.. :S I guess I can do quick bit of browsing.. cuz that would mean you weighed less the higher you got, and that's absurd.. *facepalm*
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC You accelerate faster as you fall toward the earth, but not the center of it. If you could be at the direct center, you would be apparently weightless. The more you go inside the earth, the less force due to gravity you experience.
oexnorth 1 year ago
@oexnorth No no... I realize that ^^ I attached "center" so it would be understood that I didn't just think that gravity was pulling me towards the ground. Now, you are saying, though, that if I dug a hole 1/2/10/20 miles deep that I would at least accelerate less? o.O Also, that's supposing you could hollow out the center of the earth instantaneously/magically so that I could float there..
Anyway, neither here nor there :P Doesn't correlate with my initial inquiry
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC Force between two objects is Force=G*(mass of object 1)*(massof object 2)/(distance between two objects squared) G is a constant, so the only way to lessen the gravitational force between two objects is to either take mass away from one object or the other, or two put more distance between the two objects. Also remember, Force=(mass)*(acceleration), or (acceleration)=(Force)/(mass). If the force remains constant and mass is increases, acceleration becomes less.
oexnorth 1 year ago
@oexnorth Hm. So my first question was right? Acceleration in freefall occurs due to an increase in gravitational force?
Your last part is skewed. if F=MA, then yes--A=F/M.. That is NOT saying that if(magically) the mass of something increases during freefall, the acceleration will decrease. Instead, it is just showing the correlation between the 3. So that if you know the force of an impact of freefall, you can equate its acceleration based on its mass
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC
f=ma is a general representation of newtons 2 law... it represents much more than what you see
Xlaxsauce 1 year ago
@Xlaxsauce o.O
I'm saying that the assertion "if the force remains constant and mass is increased, acceleration becomes less" is not an accurate one based on f=ma ~ a=f/m
Or will you tell me that if you jump out of a plane with someone else.. and halfway towards the earth you join together.. that your acceleration will decrease just because the mass just increased?
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC Actually, that's exactly what A=F/M is saying. If you divide a constant by a larger and larger number, what happens to the value? It gets smaller and smaller. Divide 1/10, then divide 1/100, what happens, the value gets smaller. Same thing here.
oexnorth 1 year ago
@oexnorth well, it's more complicated than that.. the force WOULDN'T stay the same because you'd be adding mass. A falling object would not decelerate because you added mass to it
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC I'm just speaking in strictly theoretical terms. If F remains constant and mass increases, then yes, acceleration would decrease. Of course, in actual circumstances, if you added mass, then you would change the force due to gravity, and then acceleration would actually increase because in the gravitational equation mass is in the numerator. Again, I was just saying IF force could remain constant.
oexnorth 1 year ago
@oexnorth denominator
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC No. Wrong, sorry. F=(G*m1*m2)/r^2 m is your mass. It's in the numerator.
oexnorth 1 year ago
@oexnorth I thought you were referring to acceleration, not force
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC But do you see what I'm saying?
oexnorth 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC It's called Newton's square law.
Jezebel333 2 months ago
@xESOTERlC Not only would you weigh less the further away from the center of gravity you get, your feet at this very moment weigh less than your head if you are standing, but the difference is so miniscule that you don't notice it.
Jezebel333 2 months ago
This should go into a new Geology playlist as well as the Cosmology and Biology playlists.
KingPtolemyIII 1 year ago
@KingPtolemyIII Actually, it fits into the Biology playlist, since these topics are covered in AP Biology and college Biology.
vpletap 1 year ago 3
So did Theia's material merge with the "proto-earth" or keep going?
madeofyucca 1 year ago
Thanks, mate. I think my free time may start consisting of watching your videos instead of reading or playing games.
Cheers.
GuptaNikhil92 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear YouTube,
The Like/Dislike system, I can live with. I've gotten used to it now.
The new comment layout, fine with me.
But THIS, is just too much too take! The front page has completely lost it's organised, simple layout!
I don't know where you get your ideas, but I think I speak for a big part of the community when I say "YouTube, go F*ck yourself."
I hate people who ask for thumbs up, but this is not meant to be funny. This is serious! Give this a thumbs up and copy/paste!
Ianmcl0889 1 year ago
The earth started with god and he made animals and trees and nappy time and unicorns and rainbows and 4 leaf clovers
duh
bevon17 1 year ago 75
@bevon17 i read it in a book so its true
dont question it
bevon17 1 year ago
@bevon17 yeah... books aren't always right you know.
redjr242 1 year ago
@bevon17 i dnt believe that god made the earth, i dnt believe that he brought animals here, i dnt think all that is bullshit.. i just think that is not true......
Rulazm 10 months ago
@Rulazm He's using sarcasm...
TheAppleShampoo182 6 months ago
@bevon17 very funny
coolstrong395 3 months ago
@bevon17 Great job being a jerk.
jedihunter176 2 months ago
Sal, love your vids. Is there anything you dont know???
mindofmine2 1 year ago
@mindofmine2 no, i dont think so, he's a bloody genius! =)
monkeycheeseking 1 year ago
you should learn and teach geology khan
frozenstrawbs 1 year ago
how was space formed?
mohsin364 1 year ago
that was a good and open-minded thought when you corrected to "the only way we know" ;)
reik2006 1 year ago 6
@reik2006 wow....there is no god you piece of antimatter :D
OhMyGoddlessGamer 1 year ago
@OhMyGoddlessGamer ohhh no, thats not what I meant. It was more about the fact, that theories are true as long as nobody proved them wrong (falsification) and therefore one shoudn't sound to absolutistic about how the world works out. That's the open-minded thought I was talking about ;)
reik2006 1 year ago
@reik2006: “The fact, that theories are true as long as nobody proved them wrong (falsification)” — Oh really...? Lol, so the theory that elves exist on Neptune is true as long as nobody proves it wrong? “That's the open-minded thought I was talking about ;) — Mm… right.. makes sense.
MarvelsofaLifetime 1 year ago 5
@MarvelsofaLifetime I admit you're right. The theories are not true, they are just valid. People can look for elves on Neptune (it's a finite place) and tell you there aren't any (.. at least that's what I expect to happen). If you say on the other hand, that there are elves somewhere out there, it's neither a valid theory and of course nor a true one (you have to look anywhere, which is impossible). Thank you for pointing out my careless use of words and the contradictions.
reik2006 1 year ago
Comment removed
reik2006 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MarvelsofaLifetime and by nor a true one I'm not saying that there are no evles out there ... there well could be elves :P but as far as I know theres no evidence for them
reik2006 1 year ago
I don't even need to know this for IB but its just so interesting!!
dollzandpinz 1 year ago
Astronomy videos are back!!!!!!!! Love them!!!!!!
arev1977 1 year ago 39
Sal, you should do a video on Earth Destruction!
rinwhr 1 year ago 5
@rinwhr Indeed!!!!
arev1977 1 year ago
@rinwhr haha! Sal's top 5 earth's destruction
bbenally88 1 year ago
@rinwhr "a video on Earth Destruction!"
Just play this video backwards.
marsCubed 1 year ago 2
thnks for helping me with earth science!
Dragonicafan 1 year ago
Earth Science?! If so, Thank You Sal! This subject was not very intuitive to me when I had to learn it at school...
alexandrenr 1 year ago