@Pipersdaddy32 lol noooo he's not an idiot, it's a clever response to the creationist videos saying that since they don't find new life coming out of peanut butter jars, it's impossible for life to have formed naturally on the early earth.
@TheBlitMaster@TheBlitMaster I believe thaat i said "those who oppose creationism. If you are.catholic/christian or have have faith in God, I am pretty sure you believe that He created us. But about the second part of your response, when those who don't believe die (according to their beliefs) the will just turn into dust in the ground. Yku would have a soul that moves on and that will be the end of your.existence. How can youcare about the future of society if you don't exist?
@CVForty3 when you die what good does an iphone do you? In fact, those who oppose creationism see no value for anything after death. You can be proud of what humans have made, but with your gloom outlook on the world, it means absolutely nothing. God gave us logic, allowed us to create and innovate with our minds but He didnt wish for us to abandon our faith and place it in Science. our scientists will discover something cool in 100 years but it wont be the wonders of God.
@Jphoward3 " In fact, those who oppose creationism see no value for anything after death." Well, that's partially true, except for 90% of Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians alive today, oh and many Buddhists too. Come to think of it, most people who believe in evolution see value in life after death, hell even atheists do, though not in the afterlife, more in the future advancement of human society. "our scientists will invent something kickass in *2-3 months*". That's better.
how about you: 1) stop filming pasta sauce, 2) making horrible jokes,,,,,,,,,, and clean up all the shit on your farm........oh and stop saying golly........we don't use that word anymore
@1963danno That was religion. Whether or not God created the universe is a debate for the centuries, but I can assure He made none of those things (besides, wars are beneficial from a biological point of view as they counter overpopulation)
@MegaGangstaparadise - look beyond what you have just said -- God uses some sort of God physics (happy Jesus magic?) to make the laws of the the physical universe according to you. Well, explain it. If creationism is right, you can do it AND you can demonstrate those magic rules repeatedly in controlled environments. Go ahead. If you can't, please acknowledge that you believe in supernatural mumbo jumbo and move on. This world has real problems, churchboy, and you are holding us back.
@CVForty3 That's the thing about God... you can use science all you want, but in the end He is God and we will never be able to completely explain him.
@Jphoward3 - The human inquisitive mind gave us the iphone with a whole internet in your pocket. This exists because scientists use repeatable physical sciences and build upon those ideas. This is what you can do with science. Hard to imagine what they will have in 100 years. Belief in the supernatural has given us...uh...damn little to be proud of. So, yes, you are right in a way: Neither I nor science have a way to explain your idea of a supernatural deity that can only exist in your mind.
You are missing something. Air! Open the jar then close the jar and wait a few million years. I bet it want look like pasta sauce then! This was ridiculously ignorant.
@ada2step Creationists claim that there was no death in the world before Eve ate the apple. What anatomy did the original created animals e.g scorpions, crocodile, cheetah, lion, killer whale, spider,have? The present anatomy of carnivores is intrinsically adapted to catching, killing & eating other animals. Did satan wave a magic wand and change the animals overnight from herbivores into the present day form? Will lions & kestrels go to hell for eating other animals?
This is rediculous. Everyone knows that a jar of pasta sauce won't turn into a goat. It turns into the crew of Monty Python's Flying Circus. If you want a goat, you have to use Alfrado sauce.
Mathematical Logic cannot be proven by Science, they are the very Priori or basic assumptions which Science stands on, that has to be believed, they are not proven. Zero is a concept, it cannot be Materially proven, it is an intelligent conclusion. Science is not Nature, Science is a man made paradigm, a studious search for the Truth , but never the Truth itself. One cannot Equivocate "Science" with "Nature" Science does not give us any values, but Nature gives us Values.
Mathematical Logic cannot be proven by Science, they are the very Priori or basic assumptions which Science stands on, that has to be believed, they are not proven. Zero is a concept, it cannot be Materially proven, it is an intelligent conclusion. Science is not Nature, Science is a man made paradigm, a studious search for the Truth , but never the Truth itself. One cannot Equivocate "Science" with "Nature" Science does not give us any values, but Nature gives us Values.
The Pasta Sauce is "Created" not Evolved. And it does not afford any spontaneous new life forms evolving out of the available chemistry , sunlight and time . That was the real point, Mars is Sterile, it has all the pasta sauce of Sunlight, Water, Minerals, but , no life. Mars is Sterile, because Evolution is not a Universal Law acting in all places equally. If Evolution was a Scientific Law, then some sort of life would have been found on Mars, but Mars is Sterile, Evolution is False.
@CarmineFragione mars lost its atmosphere capable of life millions or billions of years ago but if it still had it the single celled life on it would have evolved into a balanced environment and thats all for me on this stupid video but relly who cares its youtube
@do501 maybe it's "Prago" that is the pasta sauce in the jar that advertises " If it's Italian, it's in there" Actually Leonardo Da Vinci invented Life with a recorded memory , so we all believe in the past, but it is just something Da Vinci wrote into his code.
@do501 The hypothesis was about "Spontaneous Generation of Life " not Evolution. The Prago Sauce had all the expected ingrediants of choice, and the peanut butter is a viable host for any new form of life to feed upon, if it could ever happen that a brand new form of life, say , came here from alien worlds and got caught in the net of the host experiment. Either Life must be Created, or there is a Natural Evolutionary Law of the Universe that spontaneously creates life.
@CarmineFragione hahahahahahahah! This whole universe...Everything in this universe. Every blade of grass and every grain of sand. Was put here for you. That's what we call egotism.
@EatChipsNow Not just for me, but for all who are partakers of the same experience. Where do the numbers come from ? Where does Mathematical Logic come from ?
If God didn't create the Universe, then how did we begin? This nothingness of "space" wouldn't even exist. If nothing is here, there's not even nothing including "space." Therefore since this space can't exist, a random atom can't exist. Which this in turn means that ONE atom cannot have the ability to change into hundreds of different elements and combinations. If you have Hydrogen, it will never change to oxygen. Oxygen will never change to Hydrogen. They're separate. God is Lord! :)
@jessicasmithsings umm i belive in god and replace creation with science and the universe has existed forever so has god this works for all faiths and science simple as that
@jessicasmithsings hahahahahahahah! This whole universe...Everything in this universe. Every blade of grass and every grain of sand. Was put here for you. That's what we call egotism.
All religion is nonsense. We have no use for bronze-age scribbles in today's world. For clarity see "Religious fanatic debates Atheist" on my channel.
Actually, God has been simultaneously turning the jar into the goat and the goat into the jar and making them swap places at 30 times a second, in exact sync with your camera, which is why both objects are appearing motionless and immutable. God is VERY inventive when it comes to hiding His existence from atheistic inquiry. Any person of faith, however, could've seen the constant flickering instantly, 'cause they've taken God into their hearts and so He reveals Himself to them at every moment.
I love all the goatshit around the jar... Perhaps, if God turned the jar into a goat, He could at the same time turn the shit into pasta sauce, just to drive the point home...
Damn you evolutionists, you're making my God angry! May you be touched by his noodly appendage and repent or else boil in hot pasta sauce for eternity.
Not to mention the most ignorant of all the beliefs of evolution. The big bang theory. "All the matter in the universe was squished in a dot smaller then what's visible by the naked eye". And then it exploded, and here we are. Wow, I think that sounds more like what a kindergartner would come up with, not a logical, reasonable adult. I suppose though liberals do have quite the imagination considering they're high most of the time.
@Blackwolf460 It's really funny that I've never seen anyone criticize the Big Bang while actually demonstrating a correct understanding of what the theory actually says
@ytmndman Sorry, I know and understand the Big Bang Theory. I am well versed in Science and Math, unlike most people on here who can't even spell. And, I still think it's the most ridiculous, preposterous fairy tale out there. If you want to debate with fact, give it your best shot.
@ytmndman Well, since you prefer to make snide and assumptive comments on what I know and believe verses you, I guess an intelligent conversation is out of the question. I have no problem debating issues with people, but most people on here just want ot be rude. It definately shows the character ( or lack there of ) with most youtube users, including you. Good luck in life with that kind of attitude.
@Blackwolf460 hey lol at least that theory has a starting point, instead of "poof "hello I've just been created and I already know the entire human language instantaneously!" so on and so forth... If god created adam and eve why do humans have to sexually reproduce to conceive a child?
This makes less than no sense. What is he trying to prove. If he wants the jar of pasta sauce to turn into something else living, that's evolution not creationism. Just goes to show I guess the ignorance of evolutionists. There's not a single one of them that agrees with another on how matter can be created from NOTHING as "they say". Matter cannot be created or destroyed, the first law of thermodynamics. So where did the matter come from?
@Blackwolf460 He's making a satire of the crazy arguments creationists use to 'prove' evolution is wrong, you know, things that are both nonsensical and wrong. And no, spontaneous change from one species to another is not a claim of evolution as that happens naturally over an extended period of time. Also good job that you know the first law of thermodynamics, but you take it out of context - that law only applies in a closed system which the earth is not
@DreamerbyDeseption Well, than you don't know, nor have you read all of the questions from all the big time evolutionists. There is one in particular that believes that species can generate new species through birth, and I'm the looney, huh? I won't name his name since you've never read his theorys before and we'll make this a game. You find him and let me know. As I told the other moron here. I am well versed in Science, I have a deep knowledge of evolution and it couldn't be a crazier idea.
This video actually managed to stir up an argument over evolution vs creation? Wowsers, some people take things way too seriously and have way too much time on their hands.
Well fuck, this arguements digressed hasn't it... Does anybody else think that your intellectual capacity has been dragged down by this fuckwit arguement?
the very irony in this video is the fact that, there is a GOAT sitting right next to the pasta sauce. Guess that jar of pasta sauce EVOLVED into a goat...
I'm sure if you opened the jar and left it long enough, like a couple of weeks, it WOULD turn into green pasta sauce. :D It coud never however turn into Margaret Thatcher as the jar of pasta sauce has higher intelligence than that.
Very scientifically sound experiment. Loved it. You asked God to turn a jar of pasta sauce into a goat and he didn't do it. Therefore there is no purpose to life other than natural selection and dying so that other animals can eat you.
Lmfao! I like the humor! If you wanted to really 'prove' your point, you would have run the 'experiment' the full 10 minutes.
It's obvious that @Treacle97 is NO scientist. A scientist KNOWS that THEORY is the HIGHEST form of understanding, and that science only DISPROVES theories, never 100% proving anything.
According to the Vatican Information Service in a news release on October 23, 1996, Pope John Paul II was reported as saying that evolution is "more than just a theory."
So obviously you started this video with three jars of pasta sauce, one which turned into a goat and another which turned into a dog and one that did nothing. All in all, a pretty successful proof of creationism.
LOL fight fire with fire. Show them there own flaws, let them learn on there own or as I would say I don't care. Do what you want but don't offend Athiest like you know who we are.
you know in these days of such unravelling truths, why dont you make a video that help ties us together, rather then shows he insane difference between Beautiful creationists and gentle evoltitionist, monkey bless you.
For just a second when the camera panned back, I thought it might have turned into a dog! But nope, just a dog lying by the jar. Fucking hilarious man! Two opposable thumbs up.
hahaaa... you didnt look inside the jar. Perhaps it was 1/2 goat on the inside but you and your fancy 'science' didnt think that far did you? Im sure god will smite you anytime now for your ignorance.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
All you evolution believers will be pleased - I hear that a scientist has recently found a skeleton of an intermediate form...so thats it settled! - evolution could (afterall) be a FACT, and not just a THEORY as Darwin himself said it was!
I must warn you though - the guy who told me about the discovery is not very trustworthy, he's daft and often tells big fat lies, so do your own investigative work to establish that it is true before you commence the party...till then its SPECULATION/THEORY
@Desertphile It's been claimed as theory for a very long time like the theory of relativity and other things with theory in the name..... It doesn't mean it's not proven. Scientists have found out that we share a common ancestor to that of the apes. I just cut out the middle man and became Pastifarian..... It's exactly the same belief. Except no "God".... just a flying spaghetti monster.
@Desertphile i agree when a scientist says something is a theory is is well tested when an idiot like treacle97 doesn't read or learn anything THEORY in her mind mean a speculation
@TREACLE97 IT is difficult to debate with a person who cannot get beyond the idea that words are not absolutes. Words merely convey ideas, or represent concrete objects. Theory is a good example. Theory has a number of meanings. Look it up in the Oxford dictionary. The common usage is synonymous with a hypothesis ie. an attemot to explain a phenomena that will be tested to see whether it is true or false. Unfortunately for you, a Theory can also refer to a hypothesis that HAS BEEN tested.
@TREACLE97 'The word theory, when used by scientists, refers to an explanation of reality that has been thoroughly tested so that most scientists agree on it. It can be changed if new information is found. Theory is different from a working hypothesis, which is a theory that hasn't been fully tested; that is, a hypothesis is an unproven theory.' A decent introduction from Wikipedia. An alternative word for Theory in this sense might be 'rules'. Atomic Theory really means Atomic set of Rules.
@TREACLE97 Just to let you know, you say Theory as if it lowers the value of it. In the scientific world, the word Theory is used to describe a verifiable explanation of some aspect of the natural world. The fact is that the theory of evolution has had mountains of evidence that creationists cannot debunk. The only true way to be a creationist in our modern world is to truly bury your head in the sand and ignore reality.
@TREACLE97 You obviously do not understand the concept of theory or speculation. Speculaiton is a hypothesis not a theory. The theory of evolution is no different from the theory of gravity or the theory of relativity .
@JesusChristLiesToYou - thanks for your comments. For your information I work as a scientist and I am an atheist!. Your argument does not dissuade me from the fact that evolution is a theory and not a FACT - if theory = fact, the word theory would be redundant - and that’s a fact (not a theory). Its clear that I am considerably more intelligent that you, so to save a little face, before posting any other comments, cut out the bad language and do a spell check.
@TREACLE97 ; If you were a scientist you would know that a theory is a body of facts, a collection of facts: a theory is the highest achievement that scientists strive for. Evolution is a fact; evolutionary theory explains the how and why of evolution.
@JesusChristLiesToYou - Thats another one of your theories - I could be just an unemployed bum, but it would not rationally make the theory of evolution a fact - look, I am open to the posibility that Darwins theory of evolution is not 100% what actually happened because it has not yet been proven - you 'believe' it is fact - it is obvious that I cannot convince you that it might not be fact no more than than I can convince a devout christian that God might not be a fact.
No it is not a theory of mine, it is an hypothesis. You clearly cannot distinguish between the two. So don't give me this presposterous, blatant bullshit that you are a scientist. You know you are not and everyone else who have viewed your obscenely rdiciulous comments know you are not.
@JesusChristLiesToYou - everything you say might be correct but you do not have sufficient evidence to either prove or disprove it. No interpretation of the word 'theory' exactly translates to the word 'fact' and that is not a theory, it is a fact so you will have to live with that one no matter how stupid you belive me to be! - If I was really a scientists I think I would just find your judgements and ramblings funny and smile to myself...I am smiling!
@TREACLE97 If you are really a scientist, then please explain to me the concept of hypothesis testing, and why it does not apply to evolutionary science. You won't be able to google the answer, btw.
@TREACLE97 There has already been several lists of transitional fossils. And a scientific theory can be falsified, but is a well tested explanation of a large body of facts. A regular theory when used in thoughts can be synonymous with an idea. If this were fifth grade english, you'd have gotten an F.
@anchoviesyuk - 'Every fossil ever found is an intermediate form' - are you serious? - that is mathematically impossible...ney, stupid! - if all fossils are intermediate then no species can exist. As you are an intermediate form yourself, what kind/species will you eventually be?...more intelligent is a given, but look, I have to go walk my dog before it evolves in to a fish and suffocates, so catch you later pal.
@TREACLE97 Treacle97 "if all fossils are intermediate then no species can exist"
That's basically our (people who accept reality) understanding of living creatures. There is no definate line between a member of a species and members of an ancestor species. One species blurs into another.
@TREACLE97 In the immortal words of Inigo Montoya: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means"
A scientific theory is a testable model that fits all the evidence so far collected. It has been published, reviewed, questioned, and attacked, but nothing has yet arisen to debunk or replace it. This is not the same as a hypothesis, a guess, a wild speculation, or any concept which has not been tested, or which can neither be proven nor disproven.
@TREACLE97 Archaic sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Australopithecus, Ardipithecus, Pierolapithecus, Proconsul, Aegyptopithecus, Apidium. and after giving you all these transitional forms in human evolution, im sure you will not even bother to google them or give any importance to the fact they exist. I hate you theists so very much for you closed eyes and arrogant condescension, when you clearly know nothing of science and even less of that holly book you pretend to live your life by.
@Legaltimes - why do you assume I am not athiest? - I am a scientist (and athiest), I have examined the evidence, and I have reached my own conclusions - whats wrong with that? - I have a very high I.Q. so make my own judgements based on evidence, not what society, governments or anyone else would like me to believe. If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years, but many have, so something about your theory is wrong - if you are ape, that's fine!
@TREACLE97 Ok first, IQs haven't been used since Christopher Langan, moron. Second how the fuck could you have examined the evidence and still say things as stupid as "If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years" knowing full well that if an organism is well suited for his unchanging environment any variations would only hinder its survival. and implying that only one intermediate form had been discovered. i reserve ignorance like yours for theist.
@Legaltimes - Believing species exist due to evolution while accepting some have not changed at all in millions of years (only possible if no significant changes have occurred to the environment including other species changing and occurring) smacks of a low I.Q to me!...don't apply to mensa to prove a point - trust me, you will be wasting your money! - have you ever considered how many species would exist if darwinism was true? - would it really be so many?; or would it be just a few? - think!
@TREACLE97 omg man shut up already, your saying no animal can stay basically the same over millions of years. Alligators have changed very little except in size, and that can be easily explained due to the fact other animals no matter how evolved always come to watering holes where they are. This allows for very little evolutionary pressure to change. And insulting me by saying i have a low IQ, wow you got me on the run. it always takes a big man to go to the "nuhu your dumb" argument, bravo!!!
@TREACLE97 Seeing that 99% of all species are now extinct, uhhh yeah i do expect there to be so many. Now shhhh its time to stop showing how dumb you are to random strangers.
@TREACLE97 "how many species would exist if darwinism was true? - would it really be so many?; or would it be just a few? - think!"
It's reasonable for me to assume that you know the answer to the question you posed, given it's rhetorical tone. So what is the answer? My estimate is approx. 2 million (excluding bacteria and viruses). What's your estimate?
@TREACLE97 "If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years"
...facepalm...
Where did you get that utter nonsense??? There is *nothing* in evolution theory that makes that claim. If an animal has reached more or less "perfection" (e.g. great white sharks), then any subsequent change would be detrimental, so the species would likely not be able to compete with its unchanged cousin and would die out. You head is full of treacle.
@TREACLE97 OK first of all this nonsense that we havent found any transisional fossils is rediculous. Just Google it dude. Second the word theory in the scientific context doesn't mean what you think it means. Theories are the most important things in science. Facts are a dime a dozen, but theories explain and unite facts.
Wtf are you even talking about in this video? Wow, you may be the biggest idiot in the world.
Pipersdaddy32 2 weeks ago
@Pipersdaddy32 lol noooo he's not an idiot, it's a clever response to the creationist videos saying that since they don't find new life coming out of peanut butter jars, it's impossible for life to have formed naturally on the early earth.
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 2 weeks ago
@TheBlitMaster @TheBlitMaster I believe thaat i said "those who oppose creationism. If you are.catholic/christian or have have faith in God, I am pretty sure you believe that He created us. But about the second part of your response, when those who don't believe die (according to their beliefs) the will just turn into dust in the ground. Yku would have a soul that moves on and that will be the end of your.existence. How can youcare about the future of society if you don't exist?
Jphoward3 1 month ago
@TheBlitMaster
Jphoward3 1 month ago
@CVForty3 when you die what good does an iphone do you? In fact, those who oppose creationism see no value for anything after death. You can be proud of what humans have made, but with your gloom outlook on the world, it means absolutely nothing. God gave us logic, allowed us to create and innovate with our minds but He didnt wish for us to abandon our faith and place it in Science. our scientists will discover something cool in 100 years but it wont be the wonders of God.
Jphoward3 1 month ago
@Jphoward3 " In fact, those who oppose creationism see no value for anything after death." Well, that's partially true, except for 90% of Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians alive today, oh and many Buddhists too. Come to think of it, most people who believe in evolution see value in life after death, hell even atheists do, though not in the afterlife, more in the future advancement of human society. "our scientists will invent something kickass in *2-3 months*". That's better.
TheBlitMaster 1 month ago
how about you: 1) stop filming pasta sauce, 2) making horrible jokes,,,,,,,,,, and clean up all the shit on your farm........oh and stop saying golly........we don't use that word anymore
MrTmb14 2 months ago
An interesting case of Shcrodingers Goat!
overusedoxymoron2003 3 months ago
If creationists are so scientifical, how come they don't explain the exact processes that God used to make matter, the universe, and life itself?
CVForty3 3 months ago
@CVForty3 God gave us the laws of the universe ;D
MegaGangstaparadise 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise God also gave us the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition and numerous Holy Wars, so what.
1963danno 2 months ago
@1963danno That was religion. Whether or not God created the universe is a debate for the centuries, but I can assure He made none of those things (besides, wars are beneficial from a biological point of view as they counter overpopulation)
danibilbocascante 2 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise - look beyond what you have just said -- God uses some sort of God physics (happy Jesus magic?) to make the laws of the the physical universe according to you. Well, explain it. If creationism is right, you can do it AND you can demonstrate those magic rules repeatedly in controlled environments. Go ahead. If you can't, please acknowledge that you believe in supernatural mumbo jumbo and move on. This world has real problems, churchboy, and you are holding us back.
CVForty3 1 month ago
@CVForty3 That's the thing about God... you can use science all you want, but in the end He is God and we will never be able to completely explain him.
A-whole!!!
Jphoward3 1 month ago
@Jphoward3 - The human inquisitive mind gave us the iphone with a whole internet in your pocket. This exists because scientists use repeatable physical sciences and build upon those ideas. This is what you can do with science. Hard to imagine what they will have in 100 years. Belief in the supernatural has given us...uh...damn little to be proud of. So, yes, you are right in a way: Neither I nor science have a way to explain your idea of a supernatural deity that can only exist in your mind.
CVForty3 1 month ago
hahaha you have a goat. Awesome.
PrivateLJenkins 3 months ago
You are missing something. Air! Open the jar then close the jar and wait a few million years. I bet it want look like pasta sauce then! This was ridiculously ignorant.
Lintpocket 3 months ago
If evolution is true the pasta sauce would turn into a cell that turns into a frog tha turns into a monkey that turns into a human.Lame vid
ada2step 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ada2step Creationists claim that there was no death in the world before Eve ate the apple. What anatomy did the original created animals e.g scorpions, crocodile, cheetah, lion, killer whale, spider,have? The present anatomy of carnivores is intrinsically adapted to catching, killing & eating other animals. Did satan wave a magic wand and change the animals overnight from herbivores into the present day form? Will lions & kestrels go to hell for eating other animals?
zytigon 3 months ago
I dont get it.
VoodooPolitico 3 months ago
i think the one filming the video turned to a goat!
johlo05 3 months ago
This is rediculous. Everyone knows that a jar of pasta sauce won't turn into a goat. It turns into the crew of Monty Python's Flying Circus. If you want a goat, you have to use Alfrado sauce.
putzthewondersloth 3 months ago 2
IDIOTS! The pasta sauce is clearly evidence for the flying spaghetti monster. (BTW Alfredo sauce is used to tempt you by gingers)
SACK0FWINE 4 months ago
Mathematical Logic cannot be proven by Science, they are the very Priori or basic assumptions which Science stands on, that has to be believed, they are not proven. Zero is a concept, it cannot be Materially proven, it is an intelligent conclusion. Science is not Nature, Science is a man made paradigm, a studious search for the Truth , but never the Truth itself. One cannot Equivocate "Science" with "Nature" Science does not give us any values, but Nature gives us Values.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
@CarmineFragione Dude, there is no "Truth". Get your shit straight.
DukeTwicep 3 months ago
Mathematical Logic cannot be proven by Science, they are the very Priori or basic assumptions which Science stands on, that has to be believed, they are not proven. Zero is a concept, it cannot be Materially proven, it is an intelligent conclusion. Science is not Nature, Science is a man made paradigm, a studious search for the Truth , but never the Truth itself. One cannot Equivocate "Science" with "Nature" Science does not give us any values, but Nature gives us Values.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
The Pasta Sauce is "Created" not Evolved. And it does not afford any spontaneous new life forms evolving out of the available chemistry , sunlight and time . That was the real point, Mars is Sterile, it has all the pasta sauce of Sunlight, Water, Minerals, but , no life. Mars is Sterile, because Evolution is not a Universal Law acting in all places equally. If Evolution was a Scientific Law, then some sort of life would have been found on Mars, but Mars is Sterile, Evolution is False.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
@CarmineFragione mars lost its atmosphere capable of life millions or billions of years ago but if it still had it the single celled life on it would have evolved into a balanced environment and thats all for me on this stupid video but relly who cares its youtube
do501 4 months ago
@do501 maybe it's "Prago" that is the pasta sauce in the jar that advertises " If it's Italian, it's in there" Actually Leonardo Da Vinci invented Life with a recorded memory , so we all believe in the past, but it is just something Da Vinci wrote into his code.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
@CarmineFragione i dont follow but go on
do501 4 months ago
@do501 The hypothesis was about "Spontaneous Generation of Life " not Evolution. The Prago Sauce had all the expected ingrediants of choice, and the peanut butter is a viable host for any new form of life to feed upon, if it could ever happen that a brand new form of life, say , came here from alien worlds and got caught in the net of the host experiment. Either Life must be Created, or there is a Natural Evolutionary Law of the Universe that spontaneously creates life.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
@CarmineFragione hahahahahahahah! This whole universe...Everything in this universe. Every blade of grass and every grain of sand. Was put here for you. That's what we call egotism.
EatChipsNow 4 months ago
@EatChipsNow Not just for me, but for all who are partakers of the same experience. Where do the numbers come from ? Where does Mathematical Logic come from ?
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
If God didn't create the Universe, then how did we begin? This nothingness of "space" wouldn't even exist. If nothing is here, there's not even nothing including "space." Therefore since this space can't exist, a random atom can't exist. Which this in turn means that ONE atom cannot have the ability to change into hundreds of different elements and combinations. If you have Hydrogen, it will never change to oxygen. Oxygen will never change to Hydrogen. They're separate. God is Lord! :)
jessicasmithsings 4 months ago
@jessicasmithsings umm i belive in god and replace creation with science and the universe has existed forever so has god this works for all faiths and science simple as that
do501 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jessicasmithsings hahahahahahahah! This whole universe...Everything in this universe. Every blade of grass and every grain of sand. Was put here for you. That's what we call egotism.
EatChipsNow 4 months ago
@jessicasmithsings Zero Point Energy is your "Nothing" lol, weve always had it.
UNSCDefenseForces 3 months ago
Thanks for showing a rural person mocking creationism....there is hope for red America after all...
MrRafaelblock 4 months ago
Pastafarianism strikes again! Ramen.
psucarrierae 4 months ago 7
You could at least wait another half hour fo ra chance to see it turn into SM Geller... Well, you still got a goat.
synsei1 4 months ago
I was just looking for a fucking banana bread recipe. I've been bouncing around youtube for two hours now.
dynamitedigums 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
All religion is nonsense. We have no use for bronze-age scribbles in today's world. For clarity see "Religious fanatic debates Atheist" on my channel.
Sweence 4 months ago
Luke 4:12 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'
Just saying. Anyways, I was actually laughing at this because it was the randomness of the pasta sauce that made me laugh.
johnylongbow9098 4 months ago
I always thought reality was the creationists' nightmare.
:D
LiveTheWild 5 months ago 3
You are not God. Far from being god's gift to women from the way you sound. Dumb red neck. Go get a job.
folriva 5 months ago
I was waiting for the dog to evolve into a goat. But I guess we need a billion more years.
oceantoo1 5 months ago
Ace! well funny!! xx
bexlerartois1 5 months ago
Actually, God has been simultaneously turning the jar into the goat and the goat into the jar and making them swap places at 30 times a second, in exact sync with your camera, which is why both objects are appearing motionless and immutable. God is VERY inventive when it comes to hiding His existence from atheistic inquiry. Any person of faith, however, could've seen the constant flickering instantly, 'cause they've taken God into their hearts and so He reveals Himself to them at every moment.
eleguaaugele 5 months ago 24
@eleguaaugele You are fucked in the head
1963danno 2 months ago
I love all the goatshit around the jar... Perhaps, if God turned the jar into a goat, He could at the same time turn the shit into pasta sauce, just to drive the point home...
eleguaaugele 5 months ago
LOL The way you delivered this kind of made my day haha Also your dog is adorable, just saying.
DreamerbyDeseption 5 months ago
It could turn into a jar of alfredo sauce
Spocktacular96 5 months ago
I BET IT WAS A DOOR BEFORE
thanksforthemessdick 5 months ago
the goat is like ''what the fuck is going on?"
Ryagful 5 months ago
Damn you evolutionists, you're making my God angry! May you be touched by his noodly appendage and repent or else boil in hot pasta sauce for eternity.
Ramen
MonsieurFonque 5 months ago 3
Not to mention the most ignorant of all the beliefs of evolution. The big bang theory. "All the matter in the universe was squished in a dot smaller then what's visible by the naked eye". And then it exploded, and here we are. Wow, I think that sounds more like what a kindergartner would come up with, not a logical, reasonable adult. I suppose though liberals do have quite the imagination considering they're high most of the time.
Blackwolf460 6 months ago
@Blackwolf460 It's really funny that I've never seen anyone criticize the Big Bang while actually demonstrating a correct understanding of what the theory actually says
ytmndman 6 months ago
@ytmndman Sorry, I know and understand the Big Bang Theory. I am well versed in Science and Math, unlike most people on here who can't even spell. And, I still think it's the most ridiculous, preposterous fairy tale out there. If you want to debate with fact, give it your best shot.
Blackwolf460 5 months ago
@Blackwolf460 You obviously don't understand it since you used the word "exploded"
ytmndman 5 months ago
@ytmndman Umm, yes I do understand it and was using simple terms for simple people which is a good portion of youtube users.
Blackwolf460 5 months ago
@Blackwolf460 Suuuuuuuure you were...
ytmndman 5 months ago
@ytmndman Well, since you prefer to make snide and assumptive comments on what I know and believe verses you, I guess an intelligent conversation is out of the question. I have no problem debating issues with people, but most people on here just want ot be rude. It definately shows the character ( or lack there of ) with most youtube users, including you. Good luck in life with that kind of attitude.
Blackwolf460 5 months ago
@Blackwolf460 hey lol at least that theory has a starting point, instead of "poof "hello I've just been created and I already know the entire human language instantaneously!" so on and so forth... If god created adam and eve why do humans have to sexually reproduce to conceive a child?
SteamingBurito 5 months ago
This makes less than no sense. What is he trying to prove. If he wants the jar of pasta sauce to turn into something else living, that's evolution not creationism. Just goes to show I guess the ignorance of evolutionists. There's not a single one of them that agrees with another on how matter can be created from NOTHING as "they say". Matter cannot be created or destroyed, the first law of thermodynamics. So where did the matter come from?
Blackwolf460 6 months ago
@Blackwolf460 He's making a satire of the crazy arguments creationists use to 'prove' evolution is wrong, you know, things that are both nonsensical and wrong. And no, spontaneous change from one species to another is not a claim of evolution as that happens naturally over an extended period of time. Also good job that you know the first law of thermodynamics, but you take it out of context - that law only applies in a closed system which the earth is not
DreamerbyDeseption 5 months ago
@DreamerbyDeseption Well, than you don't know, nor have you read all of the questions from all the big time evolutionists. There is one in particular that believes that species can generate new species through birth, and I'm the looney, huh? I won't name his name since you've never read his theorys before and we'll make this a game. You find him and let me know. As I told the other moron here. I am well versed in Science, I have a deep knowledge of evolution and it couldn't be a crazier idea.
Blackwolf460 5 months ago
The first minute had me laughing hysterically
sk8rdaniel 6 months ago
holy pasta its still a jar lol
Burningthehorse 6 months ago
I think i could turn the goat into a nice pasta sauce tho
GertOgren 6 months ago 2
I got here from TV Tropes. Funny as hell, linked my girl to this. Though it does remind me I've been eating pasta for most of this week.
TwilightSupreme 6 months ago
This video actually managed to stir up an argument over evolution vs creation? Wowsers, some people take things way too seriously and have way too much time on their hands.
StarchildMagic 7 months ago
Creation is true because God simply took the jar of pasta sauce, and RE created into the same jar.
evelsteev 7 months ago 2
I think the fact that creationist's are taking this video seriously speaks for itself.
ehirst1000 8 months ago 59
@ehirst1000 Hahahaha
MrMattgreider 6 months ago
I think you need to reference the video you're spoofing - it's such a brilliant spoof if you've seen it :D
3buttocks 8 months ago 2
haha, audio is LOL
ssijak 8 months ago
fucking hilarious.... the best part is that your argument is just as substantial as the video you're mocking. Great job.....
poopstaines 8 months ago
It cannot evolve into Margaret Thatcher... It's RED !!!!!!
To be honest, in an election, I'd vote for the pasta sauce.
RoadRunnerLaser 8 months ago
Well fuck, this arguements digressed hasn't it... Does anybody else think that your intellectual capacity has been dragged down by this fuckwit arguement?
MrLittletomdj 8 months ago
the very irony in this video is the fact that, there is a GOAT sitting right next to the pasta sauce. Guess that jar of pasta sauce EVOLVED into a goat...
Dragonslair7 9 months ago
why would god turn that in to a goat for you? why would he WANT TO?
Dragonslair7 9 months ago
@Dragonslair7 dragons are evil beasts
MrKGatl 8 months ago
The goat is smiling wryly, (s)he must know something you don't!
HitfulVids 9 months ago
wait what? hes trying to say that if God doesnt do what he wants it proves evolution? thats even crazier than the actual practitioners of evolution.
chainedsoul19 9 months ago
@chainedsoul19
What does a practitioner of evolution actually practice?
jlowe424 9 months ago 2
@jlowe424 common sense
easmith0 7 months ago
@easmith0
I thought it was "bashing their heads against brick walls" aka "explaining evolution to creationists".
jlowe424 7 months ago
@chainedsoul19 He's parodying a creationist vid, not making a serious argument.
labrat1807 8 months ago
I'm sure if you opened the jar and left it long enough, like a couple of weeks, it WOULD turn into green pasta sauce. :D It coud never however turn into Margaret Thatcher as the jar of pasta sauce has higher intelligence than that.
ThomasTrue 9 months ago
if Creationism was true, then god would have created a goat beside the jar.
MrFubbels 9 months ago
@MrFubbels lol. awesome dude. agreed.
Dragonslair7 9 months ago
get a life
casey10211 9 months ago
Do me a favor. As an argument against Ragu disproving evolution, pls. watch this video:
Where did we come from? by PBS Science Now
Once you do, I want you to explain intelligently, present evidence against and do so without being rude that:
A) All of this is nonsense and why
B) All of these people are atheists
C) These highly intelligent ppl drew false conclusions
D) The science presented is incorrect, forms no conclusions and through inference supports the theory of creationism
petergrenader 9 months ago
Very scientifically sound experiment. Loved it. You asked God to turn a jar of pasta sauce into a goat and he didn't do it. Therefore there is no purpose to life other than natural selection and dying so that other animals can eat you.
tpstrat14 9 months ago
you didnt pray hard enough or sacrifice your first born. Jesus only gives you pasta if you feed his ego, read the bible duh!
Shipley415 9 months ago
The only difference is that you are not GOD and you are trying to mock HIM which HE would never perform any miracle for you who mock .
ryphraf 9 months ago
@ryphraf Oh boo ho, if God want's us to believe him, then he should do something about it even if he does mock.
AdmiralCasey18 7 months ago
stop drugging your animals so they look all cute and tired on youtube.
madnesscombat5 9 months ago
Hmm, 3 minutes of Frank Oz, a jar of immutable pasta sauce, some livestock, and a whole bunch of dried poop... I must be bored tonight =D
jq747 9 months ago
Lmfao! I like the humor! If you wanted to really 'prove' your point, you would have run the 'experiment' the full 10 minutes.
It's obvious that @Treacle97 is NO scientist. A scientist KNOWS that THEORY is the HIGHEST form of understanding, and that science only DISPROVES theories, never 100% proving anything.
psycotria 9 months ago
According to the Vatican Information Service in a news release on October 23, 1996, Pope John Paul II was reported as saying that evolution is "more than just a theory."
DJVARAO 9 months ago
You put this video under the 'pets & animals' category... That's freaking awesome XD
MyNameIsBob212 10 months ago
You have a goat?
Wolf5Vlud 10 months ago
So obviously you started this video with three jars of pasta sauce, one which turned into a goat and another which turned into a dog and one that did nothing. All in all, a pretty successful proof of creationism.
tgz5001 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL fight fire with fire. Show them there own flaws, let them learn on there own or as I would say I don't care. Do what you want but don't offend Athiest like you know who we are.
ShinWR1 10 months ago
lol fag
DavidChingPow 10 months ago
@UraharaItsumo
well unless there was a second big bang, that doesn't really apply.
JaninesDreams 10 months ago
Please tell me your being sarastic..cause if you aren't you should read the Bible and see that God isn't a genie.
NEBisYrfrend 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NEBisYrfrend Please tell me your being sarastic..cause if you aren't you should read a textbook and see that evolution isn't a genie.
GBJ83 10 months ago
@NEBisYrfrend He's making fun of a famous (and amusing, if a bit worrisome) video: Peant Butter, the Atheist's Nightmare.
That said however, it does point out the sheer fallaciousness of that particular creationist argument using their own 'logic'.
TechnomancerMorhion 10 months ago
you know in these days of such unravelling truths, why dont you make a video that help ties us together, rather then shows he insane difference between Beautiful creationists and gentle evoltitionist, monkey bless you.
pacificsound 10 months ago
You just didn't pray hard enough.
saamohod 10 months ago
How come Benny hinn can not heal amputees.
robtay1963 10 months ago
Jesus christ this guy is a hookey dude! i know, why dont you see if the jar of pasta can evolve into a smarter human then this retard!
pacificsound 11 months ago
@pacificsound Its sarcasm. Learn humor.
TheFlamingSparrow 10 months ago
For just a second when the camera panned back, I thought it might have turned into a dog! But nope, just a dog lying by the jar. Fucking hilarious man! Two opposable thumbs up.
Mirkwoods 11 months ago
give it 10 million years and maybe it will. tell me then. Oops, thats evolution
Tedmm1 11 months ago 33
@Tedmm1
more like a pair billion years.
Pontus900 7 months ago
@Tedmm1 No that's not evolution, that's you being a fucking retard.
scotthendo 5 months ago
maybe this guy will turn in to an apeman...oh yeah they didnt exist
TheCHEVYNATOR 1 year ago
You have to sacrifice the living goat and pray real hard. No wonder it didn't work.
q1000101 1 year ago
i want a goat!!!!!
ThaKang0f713 1 year ago
if you are a beleiver you don't need goats or pastra . just pray for everything. no car, money,no house,food, clothers ect just prayer
otherworldtrader1 1 year ago
@otherworldtrader1 Jesus said that in the new testament. But aparently they WILL say "That's open for interpretation"
crazyinsane500 11 months ago
I think all his animals dead waiting to get fed. Poor goats.
shaneisawesome11 1 year ago
since we don't know what happened after this video stopped, God could've really turned it into a goat
iliveon 1 year ago
Desertphile loves the pasta and sauce, I hope you don't wait till it goes bad!
luc59457 1 year ago
hahaaa... you didnt look inside the jar. Perhaps it was 1/2 goat on the inside but you and your fancy 'science' didnt think that far did you? Im sure god will smite you anytime now for your ignorance.
bdhcarbon 1 year ago
If you want to see a transitional form, just look in a mirror. Unless doomed to extinction, every species is a transitional form.
djsinatra100 1 year ago
@desertphile You forgot to pray. But, your still right.
ligerman30 1 year ago
That is a false analogy, everyone knows The Flying Spagetti Monster prefers Newmans sockarooni sauce
Felhaven 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All you evolution believers will be pleased - I hear that a scientist has recently found a skeleton of an intermediate form...so thats it settled! - evolution could (afterall) be a FACT, and not just a THEORY as Darwin himself said it was!
I must warn you though - the guy who told me about the discovery is not very trustworthy, he's daft and often tells big fat lies, so do your own investigative work to establish that it is true before you commence the party...till then its SPECULATION/THEORY
TREACLE97 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 ; Theory: a well-tested, never falsified, explanation for a large body of facts.
Desertphile 1 year ago 42
@Desertphile It's been claimed as theory for a very long time like the theory of relativity and other things with theory in the name..... It doesn't mean it's not proven. Scientists have found out that we share a common ancestor to that of the apes. I just cut out the middle man and became Pastifarian..... It's exactly the same belief. Except no "God".... just a flying spaghetti monster.
TheSPYDA7 11 months ago
@Desertphile I just just about to type something similar.
Ostrasize 9 months ago
@Desertphile i agree when a scientist says something is a theory is is well tested when an idiot like treacle97 doesn't read or learn anything THEORY in her mind mean a speculation
DAKGOD4EVER 9 months ago
@TREACLE97 IT is difficult to debate with a person who cannot get beyond the idea that words are not absolutes. Words merely convey ideas, or represent concrete objects. Theory is a good example. Theory has a number of meanings. Look it up in the Oxford dictionary. The common usage is synonymous with a hypothesis ie. an attemot to explain a phenomena that will be tested to see whether it is true or false. Unfortunately for you, a Theory can also refer to a hypothesis that HAS BEEN tested.
ptolemyauletesXII 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 'The word theory, when used by scientists, refers to an explanation of reality that has been thoroughly tested so that most scientists agree on it. It can be changed if new information is found. Theory is different from a working hypothesis, which is a theory that hasn't been fully tested; that is, a hypothesis is an unproven theory.' A decent introduction from Wikipedia. An alternative word for Theory in this sense might be 'rules'. Atomic Theory really means Atomic set of Rules.
ptolemyauletesXII 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 please read what is a theory in scientific terms and not in the usual language.
adriiPortillo 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 Desertphile is right: Theory in the scientific sense doesn't mean that you have to doubt it. I
A theory is nothing bad so the term "just a theory" makes no sense. You can argue with EVERYTHING, no matter how many evidence you find.
wqtpuu 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 Just to let you know, you say Theory as if it lowers the value of it. In the scientific world, the word Theory is used to describe a verifiable explanation of some aspect of the natural world. The fact is that the theory of evolution has had mountains of evidence that creationists cannot debunk. The only true way to be a creationist in our modern world is to truly bury your head in the sand and ignore reality.
jkrobertson88 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 You obviously do not understand the concept of theory or speculation. Speculaiton is a hypothesis not a theory. The theory of evolution is no different from the theory of gravity or the theory of relativity .
Read a dicionary and learn what theory means.
You fucking christian moron.
JesusChristLiesToYou 1 year ago
@JesusChristLiesToYou - thanks for your comments. For your information I work as a scientist and I am an atheist!. Your argument does not dissuade me from the fact that evolution is a theory and not a FACT - if theory = fact, the word theory would be redundant - and that’s a fact (not a theory). Its clear that I am considerably more intelligent that you, so to save a little face, before posting any other comments, cut out the bad language and do a spell check.
TREACLE97 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 ; If you were a scientist you would know that a theory is a body of facts, a collection of facts: a theory is the highest achievement that scientists strive for. Evolution is a fact; evolutionary theory explains the how and why of evolution.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 I do not believe you are a Scientist for one moment.
JesusChristLiesToYou 1 year ago
@JesusChristLiesToYou - Thats another one of your theories - I could be just an unemployed bum, but it would not rationally make the theory of evolution a fact - look, I am open to the posibility that Darwins theory of evolution is not 100% what actually happened because it has not yet been proven - you 'believe' it is fact - it is obvious that I cannot convince you that it might not be fact no more than than I can convince a devout christian that God might not be a fact.
TREACLE97 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 "Thats another one of your theories"
No it is not a theory of mine, it is an hypothesis. You clearly cannot distinguish between the two. So don't give me this presposterous, blatant bullshit that you are a scientist. You know you are not and everyone else who have viewed your obscenely rdiciulous comments know you are not.
JesusChristLiesToYou 1 year ago
@JesusChristLiesToYou - everything you say might be correct but you do not have sufficient evidence to either prove or disprove it. No interpretation of the word 'theory' exactly translates to the word 'fact' and that is not a theory, it is a fact so you will have to live with that one no matter how stupid you belive me to be! - If I was really a scientists I think I would just find your judgements and ramblings funny and smile to myself...I am smiling!
TREACLE97 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 If you was a scientist you'd probably lost all credibility by showing your lack of knowledge on the matter...
Acrimonator 10 months ago
Comment removed
labrat1807 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TREACLE97 If you are really a scientist, then please explain to me the concept of hypothesis testing, and why it does not apply to evolutionary science. You won't be able to google the answer, btw.
labrat1807 8 months ago
@TREACLE97 I think you're getting theory and hypothesis mixed up
timelordcreation 1 year ago
@TREACLE97 There has already been several lists of transitional fossils. And a scientific theory can be falsified, but is a well tested explanation of a large body of facts. A regular theory when used in thoughts can be synonymous with an idea. If this were fifth grade english, you'd have gotten an F.
crazyinsane500 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 go look up what a scientific theory is and means you idiot
hsmnwnner 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 Excuse me TREACLE97, aka shitforbrains, every fossil ever found is an intermediate form.
anchoviesyuk 11 months ago
@anchoviesyuk - 'Every fossil ever found is an intermediate form' - are you serious? - that is mathematically impossible...ney, stupid! - if all fossils are intermediate then no species can exist. As you are an intermediate form yourself, what kind/species will you eventually be?...more intelligent is a given, but look, I have to go walk my dog before it evolves in to a fish and suffocates, so catch you later pal.
TREACLE97 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 Actually every fossil is an intermediate form between something and something.
For example, when you become a fossil you will be an intermediate form between a moron and an idiot.
Scientists of the day will classify you as 'homo moriot' and put you in a museum between Kent Hovind and Kirk Cameron.
ftwsmp 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 Treacle97 "if all fossils are intermediate then no species can exist"
That's basically our (people who accept reality) understanding of living creatures. There is no definate line between a member of a species and members of an ancestor species. One species blurs into another.
lracuda76 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 In the immortal words of Inigo Montoya: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means"
A scientific theory is a testable model that fits all the evidence so far collected. It has been published, reviewed, questioned, and attacked, but nothing has yet arisen to debunk or replace it. This is not the same as a hypothesis, a guess, a wild speculation, or any concept which has not been tested, or which can neither be proven nor disproven.
Shadoboy 11 months ago
@TREACLE97 Perhaps you should check word's definition before using them, bcause actually you make no sense by equating speculation and theory...
Acrimonator 10 months ago
@TREACLE97
You clearly do not comprehend the SCIENTIFIC definition of the word "theory".......
skadi87skadi 10 months ago
@TREACLE97 Archaic sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Australopithecus, Ardipithecus, Pierolapithecus, Proconsul, Aegyptopithecus, Apidium. and after giving you all these transitional forms in human evolution, im sure you will not even bother to google them or give any importance to the fact they exist. I hate you theists so very much for you closed eyes and arrogant condescension, when you clearly know nothing of science and even less of that holly book you pretend to live your life by.
Legaltimes 10 months ago
@Legaltimes - why do you assume I am not athiest? - I am a scientist (and athiest), I have examined the evidence, and I have reached my own conclusions - whats wrong with that? - I have a very high I.Q. so make my own judgements based on evidence, not what society, governments or anyone else would like me to believe. If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years, but many have, so something about your theory is wrong - if you are ape, that's fine!
TREACLE97 10 months ago
@TREACLE97 Ok first, IQs haven't been used since Christopher Langan, moron. Second how the fuck could you have examined the evidence and still say things as stupid as "If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years" knowing full well that if an organism is well suited for his unchanging environment any variations would only hinder its survival. and implying that only one intermediate form had been discovered. i reserve ignorance like yours for theist.
Legaltimes 10 months ago
@Legaltimes - Believing species exist due to evolution while accepting some have not changed at all in millions of years (only possible if no significant changes have occurred to the environment including other species changing and occurring) smacks of a low I.Q to me!...don't apply to mensa to prove a point - trust me, you will be wasting your money! - have you ever considered how many species would exist if darwinism was true? - would it really be so many?; or would it be just a few? - think!
TREACLE97 10 months ago
@TREACLE97 omg man shut up already, your saying no animal can stay basically the same over millions of years. Alligators have changed very little except in size, and that can be easily explained due to the fact other animals no matter how evolved always come to watering holes where they are. This allows for very little evolutionary pressure to change. And insulting me by saying i have a low IQ, wow you got me on the run. it always takes a big man to go to the "nuhu your dumb" argument, bravo!!!
Legaltimes 10 months ago
@TREACLE97 Seeing that 99% of all species are now extinct, uhhh yeah i do expect there to be so many. Now shhhh its time to stop showing how dumb you are to random strangers.
Legaltimes 10 months ago
@TREACLE97 "how many species would exist if darwinism was true? - would it really be so many?; or would it be just a few? - think!"
It's reasonable for me to assume that you know the answer to the question you posed, given it's rhetorical tone. So what is the answer? My estimate is approx. 2 million (excluding bacteria and viruses). What's your estimate?
labrat1807 8 months ago
@TREACLE97 "If evolution were true, then no form of life would remain unchanged for millions of years"
...facepalm...
Where did you get that utter nonsense??? There is *nothing* in evolution theory that makes that claim. If an animal has reached more or less "perfection" (e.g. great white sharks), then any subsequent change would be detrimental, so the species would likely not be able to compete with its unchanged cousin and would die out. You head is full of treacle.
jimmo42 9 months ago
@TREACLE97 OK first of all this nonsense that we havent found any transisional fossils is rediculous. Just Google it dude. Second the word theory in the scientific context doesn't mean what you think it means. Theories are the most important things in science. Facts are a dime a dozen, but theories explain and unite facts.
kilroy227 10 months ago
Maybe it will de-evolve into Peanut Butter Man's brains!
June28July 1 year ago
I once left a pair of my dirty underwear outside for a few days. You sure don't wanna know what it evolved into!
xcellken1 1 year ago
Ahh, I laughed so hard!
Just watched the Peanut Butter Man xD
Izdigger5 1 year ago
Comment removed
buythetruth1 1 year ago