Added: 2 years ago
From: sn1pe352
Views: 5,608
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "In looking at the various environmental issues we are faced with, and the tasks that we need to fulfill for the planet, if we could get more than 10 percent of the people consciously aware, than I believe we could pull the 80 percent in that direction, too."-Dr.Masaru Emoto

  • stanley meyer was an idiot for not sharing his electronic schematics to run his buggy

    on 5 volts at 2 amps with just 10 watss of electrical energy

  • High voltage low current, and its not exactly what you say it is theoneagain. Not to mention he didn't exactly plan on dying the day before full disclosure. He has given many lectures explaining it but more importantly emphasizing the importance of learning about h2o before mindlessly slaving away at circuits like a robot trying to put together legos from schematics of someone who themselves didnt really understand from micro to macro. Even still you cannot call him an idiot

  • @sn1pe352 high current shortout once dielectric breakdown occurs, as when a capacitor fails current must pass through it in order for the dielectric to fail

  • know one as been able to replicate meyers affect using onlly volts with hardly any amps

  • "Know one" or No one theoneagain? And believe it or not many many people have been able to split the molecular bonds of water with low current high voltage, thats not the important thing in this technology and isn't a violation of faradays laws of electrolysis-lenz laws etc. Until one understands from micro to macro one will never be able to replicate these sorts of technologies

  • Using radio frequencies to break apart the molecule is a promising method but it depends on how much energy is being supplied to the frequency generator in the first place. To compare it monetarily, it like spending five dollars to get a few pennies in return.

    I'm sure there will be a breakthrough - I just don't think it's been done yet....

  • The main thing to remember is Faraday's Laws of electrolysis. Greater minds than ours have studied the water molecule using equipment us backyard inventors and engineers can only dream about. I don't doubt the conventional science but there's too much pseudo-science crap being spread over the internet all promoting wildly optimistic gains. The trick is to break apart the H2O molecule at a voltage less than the 1.2 volts (theoretical) stated by Faraday and backed up by over 100 years of research.

  • @TK42138 this has nothing to do with chemical electrolysis. A capacitor breaking down is like a spark plug arcing across the air. A spark breaking the dielectric properties of air is not a standard chemical reaction with salts. Neither is the dielectric breakdown of water a standard chemical reaction, if a spark plug isn't. Do you add salt and pepper to your spark plugs to make them work? no.

  • @SeeProfileForDetails

    Myer must have been using some method we don't know about which he took to his grave. If he wasn't using electrolysis then what was he using?

  • @TK42138  I just explained it to you! Look up "Dielectric Breakdown". Breaking down water in a capacitor has NOTHING to do with chemical salts. Until people have a fundamental understanding of capacitors and dielectrics, they won't understand. Dielectric breakdown of water should be taught in schools even if it is not overunity. If what stan was doing was NOT overunity, it still breaks down water a unique different way than chemical salts would. A spark plug is dielectric breakdown of AIR.

  • @SeeProfileForDetails

    I know but what me and I suspect many others would like to know is just how much energy input is needed for the dielectric break down of water and at what rate this occurs at?

  • @TK42138 that would have to be tested in a lab. Once again, even if this method of breaking down water costs money (uses electricity and is not overunity), it still should be taught in schools as another way to break down water completely different than chemical salt style electrolysis

  • @SeeProfileForDetails

    I agree.

  • @TK42138 Yea if were talking about barbaric push and pull, but don't forget resonance, a single opera singer can shatter a trillion wine glasses if they are in the wavelength vicinity

  • @sn1pe352

    True.

  • Whatever he did, it has certainly generated (no pun intended) a lot of interest in HHO production or to be more exact, HHO production that is more efficient than what can be done now. Unless he found a way of splitting water that not even the best scientists can duplicate, I'm afraid that Meyers was probably just an old fraud or simply didn't do the math. However that's not to say that there's still no mileage in the subject. There's lots still to research.

  • hmmm...make a small one to test?...

  • slave away? I just don't want to polute. I think stan was killed because the govmnt doesn't want the public to have this kind of stuff. how much will this cost me total to make?

  • is this pure water powered car? this is cool. can you tell me where you got the plans or how you did it?

  • Good luck with your project!

  • According to Stan Myers he used different radio frequencies to break the covalent bond of the water molecule. Using his method only required a miniscule amount of electricity.

  • Hey guys

    i just found a link to some work that some boys are doing trying to replicate Stan Meyer's fuel cell and getting impressive results

    i am not a spammer but you might find it interesting but it would require quite an investment of your time to get it working. the link is panaceauniversity (dot) org / Ravi %20 Cell (dot) pdf

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more