@zZulloZz It certainly was, and I wasn't intentionally comparing it, just wanted to say a generation old game can't live up to today's graphics. But if fully remade, the graphics would rape.
@Machinimastone -- This isn't a "PS3" game, it's a PS2 game remastered in HD, and like the God of War remakes (which were boosted to 60fps), this game should've got the same treatment. Think before you post shit.
@GreatestCommentsEver if the game had 60 fps,we would NEVER see the motion or cinematic frames in action. In my opinion they should had gotten rid of the drawdistance -
@GreatestCommentsEver if the game was running at 60 frame rate per second we would never be able to see the motion blur effect on normal speed camera.and the only thing that make this game ugly is the draw distance of the background changing out of nowhere while games like skyrim have improved .
I am still impressed with the scope of the game... sure ps2 couldn't handle the game without some awful frames...but the game never frooze or anything...lately all these big titles for ps3 just keep freezing/glitching/buging....did developers got lazy or what?
1% better 8(
KEEN69MANGUST 2 days ago
Ps3's like NOPE.
wwwwwwoah3 3 days ago
Conclusion: this game was too epic for the PS2 to handle!
Lyendith 1 week ago 2
@Lyendith dude it was just a marvel that they were able to do a game like that on the PS2
IGNsucks 4 days ago
i cant express in words how happy i am that they remade this game!
TwistedCinima 1 week ago
lol i thought it said FART button at the start
lewthemaster 1 week ago
the difference is stunning! it's a shame PS2 owners had to endure such terrible frame-rates
Lnds500 1 week ago
the next saga of shadow of colossus is "The last guardian"
MTLSXLR8 1 week ago
im not comparing it to anything i was saying it doesnt look that good to me
undead12335 1 week ago
i dont care about the graphics i was just saying
undead12335 1 week ago
i dont care about the graphics i was just saying
undead12335 1 week ago
the graphics suck on both systems
undead12335 2 weeks ago
@undead12335 you really care about graphics?? graphic is the same as story of a porn movie
dyybe1 1 week ago
@dyybe1 lol That's true.
OldManNemesis 1 week ago
@dyybe1 no gameplay is story
graphics is quality LOL
AssasinsCreedBlog 1 week ago
@undead12335 You do realize this game was made in 2008 right?
zZulloZz 1 week ago
@zZulloZz You do realize this game was made in 2005 right? Why does it matter? Cause it's a generation old.
RapDog62 1 week ago
@RapDog62 Well ok 2005, this game was a revolution at that time, why compare today's graphics to it?
zZulloZz 1 week ago
@zZulloZz It certainly was, and I wasn't intentionally comparing it, just wanted to say a generation old game can't live up to today's graphics. But if fully remade, the graphics would rape.
RapDog62 1 week ago
@RapDog62 Well, why not make a shadow of the colossus 2? I've been waiting for it since I finished the first hahah
zZulloZz 1 week ago
nn puoi mettere la ps2 con la 3!
edr4f5gt6y7u 2 weeks ago
Interesting.
I gotta say though, the increased framerate made the battle against the 3rd colossus Gaius was hellish on the ps3 compared to the ps2
Eternalclaw 2 weeks ago
they fixed the flickering and the sharp edges.. great improvements anyway.
heavengalvez 3 weeks ago
both look shit
PS3bostinteaparty 4 weeks ago
@PS3bostinteaparty lowbrow!
Miaukralle 2 weeks ago
@PS3bostinteaparty Another bitch who born with a PS3 controller in the hands :P
OldManNemesis 1 week ago
Damn. The PS2 basically lived at 20fps during a colossi fight. That's pretty crazy. Thanks for the very informative video!
Dell90wattAC 1 month ago
Also... DOUBLE KIIILL!!!!
2101995eu 1 month ago
*Graphics*: "Same shit. Same shit. Same shit." -Cut Scene- "HOLY MOTHER OF GOD"
2101995eu 1 month ago 2
I remember this game when I was younger, it was just epic and I loved it =D
iLiniik 1 month ago
Wow the game looks beautiful with that PS3 framerate!
Guesturedude 1 month ago
Excellent comparison!
Nadim 2 months ago
They couldn't get 60fps on the PS3? Lazy fucks.
GreatestCommentsEver 2 months ago
@GreatestCommentsEver Average ps3 games run at 30 fps and average Xbox games run at 28 fps,if they made games 60 fps on consoles they'd cost $2000.
Machinimastone 2 months ago
@Machinimastone -- This isn't a "PS3" game, it's a PS2 game remastered in HD, and like the God of War remakes (which were boosted to 60fps), this game should've got the same treatment. Think before you post shit.
GreatestCommentsEver 2 months ago
@GreatestCommentsEver if the game had 60 fps,we would NEVER see the motion or cinematic frames in action. In my opinion they should had gotten rid of the drawdistance -
alef321 2 months ago
@alef321 -- Sorry, please explain to me what you just said.
GreatestCommentsEver 1 month ago
@GreatestCommentsEver if the game was running at 60 frame rate per second we would never be able to see the motion blur effect on normal speed camera.and the only thing that make this game ugly is the draw distance of the background changing out of nowhere while games like skyrim have improved .
alef321 1 month ago
I played at 20 fps and was happy! '-'
lcas21 3 months ago
The games runs at 20fps on PS2
Mrxdyuxd 3 months ago
PS2 14 FPS LOL
lukaskm93 3 months ago
I am still impressed with the scope of the game... sure ps2 couldn't handle the game without some awful frames...but the game never frooze or anything...lately all these big titles for ps3 just keep freezing/glitching/buging....did developers got lazy or what?
alef321 3 months ago
@alef321 nope its just about 10x harder to develop for...
CLIFTYPOPS 3 months ago
@alef321
Well said!
rocketpunchgo1 2 months ago