Odd to hear two gents wrangling over terminologies ... when nothing really matters except the beauty of the music. Call it a song or a chaconne ... who cares?
When I was a small child, I sat entranced with Ezio Pinza singing some Mozart arias ( to my mind they were "songs'). But years later, I found myself with three degrees .... one from Juilliard ... plus the Canada Council grant. I was at a concert and analyzing every nuance. And the joy was sucked right out of it.
@donaldcallen While your point is valid, it seems incredibly derisive to refer to it as "the indiscriminate terminology of the mindless iPod/cellphone generation". Such use of the word "song" has nothing to do with being "mindless" or using an iPod, but is rather a result of talking to people (i.e. most people) who don't understand the distinction because the music most people listen to consists almost entirely of songs. It's fine to correct people, but don't be condescending.
i have always loved rubinstein's interpretation of the bach-busoni chaconne, a staple of the solo piano repertoire. however, for my part, britney spears' interpretation is superior. her playing has far more emotional weight, and her use of rubato is simply unparalleled
after all, we must hold people who like music that they've heard on the internet to the lexicographical practices of composers, and god forbid that someone not know about the classical tradition and still appreciate it! that's exactly what i hate
Splendida e magica fusione fra il neoclassicismo della filologia su Bach e l'espressionismo tedesco, in cui Busoni visse quando era residente in Germania. Rubinstein rivela tutta l'aristocratica cantabilità della melodia, e forte padronanza nella stesura dei pilastri sottostanti dell'armonia polifonica. Ancora una volta il Gigante Artur Rubinstein ci ha immerso in una atmosfera elegiaca piena di nobile e variopinto macrocosmo armonico. DA GRAN PREMIO DEL DISCO !!!!!
AMAZING playing... But i much prefer transcritpion by Joachim Raff!!! It is much more similar to the original work,a bit less virtuoso, since this piese dor violin primarily doesn`t have an akcent on virtuosity, but on musicality and timbres.
Rubinstein's conception appears to the ear more vast than the actual transcription itself.
This performance will go down in my own personal history of the musical experience as one of the most soul defining.
The very breadth of it overwhelms and completely satisfies. Is there anything really left to hear after listening to this given that for me any notion I might hold about the "idea" of music is so completely expounded here?
Thanks for your posts (part II). A real change from the usual crap such as X is better than Y, hate this pianist, Z plays with no emotion, B does not play the right notes, C is faster and more powerful (seems that this is a very common measuring tool to assess quality of pianists on YT...).
I just get irritated by perfect unknowns (and probably bad musicians) dirtying music and the ones who make it.
@mimolechien What do you mean actually hear music? This is one of the best pieces ever written for any instrument, imo. To me, it is amongst the pinacle pieces of what music should be. expression and emotion with no verbal words.
So we do agree ! I just think that the music in it is too often overlooked by the pianists to the advantage of pure technical showing of, which is a pity since, as you said, it belongs to the most inspired music ever
Absolutely wonderful! FYI, for any chaconne enthusiasts around, the marimbist Nanae Mimura has recorded the chaconne on her CD "Marimba Spiritual." Her version is actually based on the Busoni piano arrangement!
why can't you just let him played finish the perfect candence then u cut from there... In this way the listeners can resolve their emotions before going to part 2...
Rubinstein > MW3
thecr8tor 4 days ago
So unforgettable version. Thank you. Regards, Sergio.
profesorsergio 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like the way Rubinstein really gives each note it's due. He's not in a race... and he doesn't over pedal. very nice.
jacmac127 5 months ago
Comment removed
jacmac127 5 months ago
Odd to hear two gents wrangling over terminologies ... when nothing really matters except the beauty of the music. Call it a song or a chaconne ... who cares?
When I was a small child, I sat entranced with Ezio Pinza singing some Mozart arias ( to my mind they were "songs'). But years later, I found myself with three degrees .... one from Juilliard ... plus the Canada Council grant. I was at a concert and analyzing every nuance. And the joy was sucked right out of it.
nikkitytom 6 months ago
@donaldcallen While your point is valid, it seems incredibly derisive to refer to it as "the indiscriminate terminology of the mindless iPod/cellphone generation". Such use of the word "song" has nothing to do with being "mindless" or using an iPod, but is rather a result of talking to people (i.e. most people) who don't understand the distinction because the music most people listen to consists almost entirely of songs. It's fine to correct people, but don't be condescending.
chizchizchiz 7 months ago
i have always loved rubinstein's interpretation of the bach-busoni chaconne, a staple of the solo piano repertoire. however, for my part, britney spears' interpretation is superior. her playing has far more emotional weight, and her use of rubato is simply unparalleled
theonetruekeeper 8 months ago 5
@theonetruekeeper LMFAO! Good one!
Fernandohayabusa 3 months ago
@donaldcallen wow way to be an elitist. i just started getting into classical, excuse me if i don't hold the compendium of knowledge that you do.
congratulations. you corrected someone on the internet and 99% of everyone won't care.
phatnitude 8 months ago
after all, we must hold people who like music that they've heard on the internet to the lexicographical practices of composers, and god forbid that someone not know about the classical tradition and still appreciate it! that's exactly what i hate
dongsdongsdongs 8 months ago
@donaldcallen good thing indiscriminate terminology from a classical music novice can be counteracted by mundane
internet pedantry
dongsdongsdongs 8 months ago
i really enjoy this piece a lot, i've never heard rubinstein play it though.
its funny a how a piece that can sound very strong and powerful can sound so soft and emotional when played by someone else.
beautiful song for sure.
phatnitude 8 months ago
Splendida e magica fusione fra il neoclassicismo della filologia su Bach e l'espressionismo tedesco, in cui Busoni visse quando era residente in Germania. Rubinstein rivela tutta l'aristocratica cantabilità della melodia, e forte padronanza nella stesura dei pilastri sottostanti dell'armonia polifonica. Ancora una volta il Gigante Artur Rubinstein ci ha immerso in una atmosfera elegiaca piena di nobile e variopinto macrocosmo armonico. DA GRAN PREMIO DEL DISCO !!!!!
darkblueangel1956 9 months ago
Never could understand people that say Bach has no emotions.
MrCoocoo146 10 months ago
AMAZING playing... But i much prefer transcritpion by Joachim Raff!!! It is much more similar to the original work,a bit less virtuoso, since this piese dor violin primarily doesn`t have an akcent on virtuosity, but on musicality and timbres.
MrStefdj 10 months ago
Comment removed
kinkajoes 11 months ago
am I high on music? I can't find part 2!
RemovdSande11 1 year ago
Rubinstein's conception appears to the ear more vast than the actual transcription itself.
This performance will go down in my own personal history of the musical experience as one of the most soul defining.
The very breadth of it overwhelms and completely satisfies. Is there anything really left to hear after listening to this given that for me any notion I might hold about the "idea" of music is so completely expounded here?
PhillipLWilcher 1 year ago 2
wonderful rendition, but this was definitely written for the violin.
oitotheworld23 1 year ago 2
C'est pas Artur Rubinstein.... gros doute.
92190sebastien 1 year ago
Wow! What a fantastic transcription!
werq34ac 1 year ago
Cómo se te ocurre poner esto incompleto? estas loco? eh?
How are you happen to post this incomplete? Are you crazy? Eh?
fepanas 1 year ago
Comment removed
fepanas 1 year ago
RDSerebrianny and Audiomagman:
Thanks for your posts (part II). A real change from the usual crap such as X is better than Y, hate this pianist, Z plays with no emotion, B does not play the right notes, C is faster and more powerful (seems that this is a very common measuring tool to assess quality of pianists on YT...).
I just get irritated by perfect unknowns (and probably bad musicians) dirtying music and the ones who make it.
So again, thanks for your nice post.
mimolechien 1 year ago 19
@mimolechien well, you are on youtube after all.....
purestr99109 3 months ago
@purestr99109
Defintively not for the value of the comments.... But anytime to listen Rubinstein playing this amazing music with such dignity and beauty.
Cheers
mimolechien 2 months ago
@mimolechien did you choose the word dignity by accident?
agniky 2 months ago
Wow! What a beautiful sound! What a perfect tempo! It breathes like seldom! I love it! I LOVE IT !!!!
Did I mentioned that I love it ?
Rubinstein was a King, a wonderful musician
It is not often that we actually hear music in this piece, and even more rare to hear both Bach and Busoni's voices.
Thanks!
mimolechien 1 year ago 5
@mimolechien What do you mean actually hear music? This is one of the best pieces ever written for any instrument, imo. To me, it is amongst the pinacle pieces of what music should be. expression and emotion with no verbal words.
BoeingB17FF 1 year ago
@BoeingB17FF
So we do agree ! I just think that the music in it is too often overlooked by the pianists to the advantage of pure technical showing of, which is a pity since, as you said, it belongs to the most inspired music ever
mimolechien 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
kinkajoes 1 year ago
Best rendition in my oppinion!
henrique1944 1 year ago
Best performance for me !
BrunoCt86 1 year ago 2
no one can beat rubinstein. I went to at least 50 of his concerts all around the world and many rehearsals too.
relaischat 1 year ago
@relaischat i would love to pick your brain sometime. I bet those rehearsals were fascinating. what was your overall impression of the man?
brianCIM 1 year ago
Incantato!!!!!
Roberto.
robertocasijazz 1 year ago
I love Rubinstein. Unsurpassed!!
KosteckiAdam 2 years ago
AR was 83 when he recorded this. I think it's just phenomenal.
The Michelangeli is wonderful too ... probably somewhat better pianistically, but I love Rubinstein's way with tone and phrasing.
rubestuh 2 years ago
@rubestuh 83? OMG and WOW!!!
AnnMarry19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rubestuh "AR was 83 when he recorded this. I think it's just phenomenal."
83. I am short of words, simply don't know what to say.
sormu16 1 year ago
Absolutely wonderful! FYI, for any chaconne enthusiasts around, the marimbist Nanae Mimura has recorded the chaconne on her CD "Marimba Spiritual." Her version is actually based on the Busoni piano arrangement!
triguntz 2 years ago
Oh, I suppose this version's okay, but have you heard Nigel Handbottom play it on the bagpipes? Divine!
snorked 2 years ago
Where can I find that? I'd love to hear it!
suffragettecity1 2 years ago
@snorked and A. de Larrocha :)
AnnMarry19 2 years ago
Michelangeli version much better
jrferrio 2 years ago
amazing rendition - that said, i stil like the violin version more. it's less... textured... in the piano
FrauShai 2 years ago
Beautiful!!
QueenZelma 2 years ago
One of my favorite versions of this gigantic piece!
lst9162 2 years ago
very, very gigantic:)
AnnMarry19 2 years ago
I LOVE THIS PIECE!!! THANKS!!!
AnnMarry19 2 years ago
SUPERB THROUGHOUT
audiomagman 2 years ago 5
Gould is nothing compared to Rubenstein.
Period.
Webarton 2 years ago
Each is GREAT in their own Pianistic VOICE!!! Hahaha
suezenne 2 years ago 11
Amen! Gould was so concerned with his voice that he forgot the composer's completely.
christoperfect 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is beautiful but glenn gould is the best !!!
br0z31x 2 years ago
gould never recorded the busoni chaconne as far as i know
MichaelDLC 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you stupid
br0z31x 2 years ago
i didn't know he recorded the busoni chaconne. could you tell me which disc. i'd love to buy it! thanks.
MichaelDLC 2 years ago 2
Ohhhh how interesting.. :-)
A Glenn Gould version?
LOL
Lokopiano
lokopiano 2 years ago
You're crazy.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
This is the first time I've ever heard this song. Unbelievably beautiful.
Sonolumino8939 3 years ago
i think gould described bach best - his music kind leads to a never ending expanding universe.
moveonupcb 3 years ago
Kremer is better
NASHARYABA 3 years ago
kremerdoesnotplaythepiano
thebloads 2 years ago
Wunderful. Rubinstein's warm sound and sonority of execution first this piece perfectly.
herodot2 3 years ago 2
perfect
PianoMazter 3 years ago
isn't it in D-minor? Because if it is, the title is wrong. But anyway, it's a incredible masterpiece.
Gravecaller 3 years ago
Why is the title wrong? d-moll means D Minor.
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago
haha, yeah, sorry. Forgot that xD
Gravecaller 3 years ago
I think that he is one of the best bach player. And best bach's chaconne player.
thespiane 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
So violin! I love this edition!!
yxgu 3 years ago
So violin!! I love this edition!!
yxgu 3 years ago
perfect
PianoMazter 3 years ago
why can't you just let him played finish the perfect candence then u cut from there... In this way the listeners can resolve their emotions before going to part 2...
kayefuda 3 years ago
my second favorite after michelangeli. all-around rubinstein maybe the greatest pianist of the past century. what a repertoire! again ty filippeo
brianCIM 3 years ago
perfect
goldberg72 3 years ago 2