Added: 3 years ago
From: TheAlexJonesChannel
Views: 5,097
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Jeeeeeeeeze, what a shame! You can hear Alex Jones on his show ALL THE TIME -- why is he doing all the talking?

  • harmaxx is not right

  • OurName4Freedom

    Google it!

  • The information that thus emerges from Mr.Dodd,is so extensive and deep,that it would take repeated viewings and major analysis to get an idea of the varied implications and meanings of the information.Inshort,an interview of substance,because the interviewer(Mr.Griffin) understood that his primary role was to bring the interviewee(Mr.Dodd) out,and the best way to accomplish this,was to set Mr.Dodds off,and then basically stay out of the way.Less is More !

  • Mr.Dodd was completely at peace to frame his answers,and to say what he had to say,at his own pace,in his own way,taking his pauses to collect his thoughts as and when he liked,for as long as he liked,without fear of Mr.Griffin inopportunely jumping in,at a pregnant moment,and disturbing Mr.Dodd's train of thought,which would result in the object of what he was trying to communicate,or some subtle point,being completely lost.I wish Alex Jones had followed the same approach in interviewing Mr.G !

  • Just finished watching a six part series containing an interview with Norman Dodds, wherein Mr.Griffin plays the part of the interviewer, and what a marked contrast to this particular interview, wherein Mr.Griffin is the interviewee ! When Griffin himself is the interviewer, he asks pertinents questions to Mr.Dodds, and then patiently let's Mr.Dodd answer them at his own pace in his own way, without interrupting him, or trying to finish his answers for him, or cutting him off ...

  • Alex has a very Colorful and upbeat personalty he just loves to talk .but his very informative,intelligent and inquisitive his right about a lot of things he says.

  • I watched all the six parts. Alex Jones is a really bad interviewer - this series could be made a case study for interviewers on what NOT to do. He consistently keeps cutting Mr.Griffin off mid sentence, often just when Griffin is about to come to the crux of what he wants to say. Alex regularly keeps interjecting with meaningless remarks and sometimes just completely bulldozes his way in, and goes off on his own tangent and it's very irritating.

  • First of all, most of the times that he interrupts, he only goes on to meaningless rant about something or the other - nothing to do with what Griffin is specifically talking about. I wish Alex had the sense to ask a pertinent question, or bring up the point of discussion, and then basically let Griffin expound in peace - wish Alex had the sense to open his mouth once for every ten times he does - wish Alex had the sense to understand that his guest on the show his far wiser and has been around

  • longer than just about anyone else in this field of research.His hallmark is an extremely systematic and methodical way of putting together material,brick by brick, with crystal clarity,each logical step leading to the next conclusion,unravelling the tangle,isolating those points that are of importance,clarifying any"muddiness" so to speak in the various issues involved,also using documented evidence in support of his case,which,while not always a necessity for arriving at the truth, DOES help.

  • He has a "less is more" approach, in that he gets right to the heart of the matter, and from that vantage point of clarity and simplicity, avoiding all the inessentials, which while they may be "fancy" or "interesting" frills, are not "to the point" or tangential, and may be confusing matters. Such a Man is meant to be listened to and heard, more than talked to or interrupted. Alex has the best intentions at heart I'm sure, but needs to improve his methods, when in these type of situations.

  • I'm afraid that after watching all 6 parts of this interview, Alex Jones may be more of a liability to this cause then a catalyst for expansion.

  • "Under anarchy you are subject to the person with the biggest fist or the biggest weapon."

    No. That's the situation under state power! Come on, man! He's not thinking this through. People always refer to sudden collapses and their immediate aftermaths as being chaos. Fine, but that's not anarchy. Anarchy IS the de-centralization of power and free association. There are thugs under ANY system, which is why people need to assert sovereignty by building free institutions, not state monopolies.

  • no you are missing the point. He said the practical result of anarchy and total government are the same. He used the paradigm of bending the spectrum into a circle so the ends toch each other.

  • That spectrum is wrong. The way it really works is that you have statists and non-statists, and "left" and "right" within both where a right-statist is further from a right-non-statist than he is from a left-statist. The yardstick is freedom.

    The "practical result" of anarchy (a free voluntary society) is as far away from "total gov't" (force) as you can get. They do not touch at all at any imagined point.

    This is a common misconception due to a knee-jerk reaction to the word "anarchy".

  • Every kind of state that has been tried leads inevitably to tyranny. That's the history of the world with nationalism and wars and all sorts of horrible collective action made possible by the centralization of power and this creepy worship of the state.

    The state is merely an institution of MEN derived from a certain idea of society. It is NOT synonymous with virtue or law or order. Anarchy is merely a different view of how to organize society. It is NOT synonymous with "chaos" or lawlessness.

  • Millionth, if a society has laws, then whoever enforces those laws IS the government. Sure, governments can be limited to city or county, but cities can war against each other too, like the city-states Sparta and Troy did, even though they were all Greeks.

    Given human nature, with humans being tribal by nature, with some being natural born followers, some being natural born leaders, some being passive, others being aggressive and power hungry, a government or "state" is inevitable.

  • Ref, looking for more followers to help out

    in the struggle against a cashless chipped society, perhaps our only hope now is to let

    drug dealers know what the bankers are getting

    up to behind their backs.

  • Once again, if you would SHUT UP long enough to let your guest finish his sentences, you might actually find out that you don't know it all. Ultimately, no one has respect for someone who is so bereft of it himself. How sad that you haven't the sufficient maturity to show some humility. YOU (and I) could have learned a great deal more if you could have shown some self control! In many ways you do your listeners a disservice in this matter.

  • Well said Deepstudy.

  • 200 yrs?? I like alex does but we dont have 200 yrs time has run out!! its sad but the Americans are waking up way too late its been 7 yrs since 911 and the majority are still asleep. During that time the Illuminati have made way too many significant moves WW3, Iran,NAU, AMERO, Credit Crises, Economic Collpase the list goes on

    Too Slow people this is Chess not chequers

    The Endgame is the Anti-Christ Dan 9:27 (Signs the peace deal)then Revelation Chap 13

    Jesus is the way

  • I think your right in that the only way to stop the illuminati freaks going any further is for someone with actual supernatural abilities to step in and intervene. Otherwise our fate is already stitched up! If you just want to trundle along and enjoy your life you can never compete with determined sociopathic control freaks who have obsessively amassed money and power in order to dominate the rest of us. The only thing that can beat their obscene wealth now is magic. Come on Jesus!!!

  • great interview, but can't agree with the analysis of Anarchy. True anarchy is Self-Governance. The problem with this is, the human species at this time is nowhere near evolved enough to practice it. However, all highly evolved (we're talking spiritually/emotionally and mentally now, not technologically) species would naturally live in a state of Self-Governance. So it can and does work, just not at this time on this planet..

  • I can't see how the population being more enslaved than it is now will benefit anyone. Surely the illuminatis or bulb heads as I call them can already buy anything their little hearts desire, why would they want to give themselves the hassle and administrative nightmare of trying to completely rule the planet. If I were them I'd get a pleasant hobbie or two, go to the theatre a lot, take in some ace gigs, jump in a UFO and go for a space ride etc

  • What a great guest and what an awful 'interview'

    Jones is an egotistical fruitcake. He always wants to be the center of attention and therefore we only get to hear 10% of what Griffin could have said because fat face wants to hear his own voice and not someone who is 1000 times smarter and more knowledgeable.

  • relax there pal, without "fatface" you wouldn't even be hearing or seeing this interview !!!

  • malahidecobra, I don't need to hear this interview because I've been listening to Griffin for decades -- without fatface interrupting.

    This is what makes me mad. You could have heard 50% more info from Griffin if fatface shut the fuck up.

    Listen to Griffin interviewing people and you'll see a professional who wants to pick the mind of his guest rather than a moron like fatface who simply uses people as a support act for his own self promoting entertainment show.

  • Well maybe you should listen to Griffin a little harder in the future as what you are doing is bulkanizing the situation. jones does sh*t his way on his show. Griffin does it his way when he's running the show ! People need ALL perspectives because people come at the info from different perspectives. I understand your frustration, I like Jones but not a fan of his Bullish style when interviewing (see your reasons above as to why). But like I said, we need ALL tastes catered for, to reach the ppl

  • people need to take individueal responsibility, only then will we win. as the world is a direct reflection of the populations minds and so is the power lost.

  • What Richard says is so true. I learned yrs ago how they divide the yr. equally in who shares or dominates the window & other ads within the convenience stores, etc. And if you're a minor player getting into the soft drink market, you have a hard time because of these two giants. I agree also our schools have become Marxist breeding grounds. I lived under communism & ran from it; now it's caught up with me :) I'm going to check out Griffin's site, "Freedom-Force" Peace, Knowledge & Freedom!

  • I think the puppet on the right shares my views. The puppet on the left is more to my liking. HEY, there's one guy holding up both Puppets!!

    GO Back To Bed America! Your Government is in Control.

    watch?v=XVzFzgHu0T0

  • I believe that many dictators and power crazy people will by default use extremist terror tacktics to intimidate and sacre people, so it makes sense to realise most of what is said is hype! So Alex is actually helping them by quoting word for word what is said! We need to stand back a little and think about the motives of these crazy people and also recognise that much of what is said is bull and if we believe it then they win because it has the desired effect in making us fearfull and angry.

  • I figured out the elections are bullshit years ago

  • go freedom force international!

    impotents defendere libertatem non possum

  • I believe in the constitution

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more