Added: 2 years ago
From: InsideLineVideo
Views: 189,410
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (317)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This rig is sick! That upshift rumble just made me j*zz in my pants.

  • How can you not love the sound it makes when it shifts? "BRRRRRrrrrrr"

  • If I win the lottery I'm gonna piss of some eco mentalists and buy a X5 M, Touareg R50, Range Rover Sport ( V8 of course) and I'm gonna buy a Audi Q7 V12. Did I forget to mention the new Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Thats before I even get onto supercars. I just wish this dream would come true. But I am gonna buy all those 4X4's when I win the lottery. Oh yeh I'm gonna buy a couple pickups, like the Dodge Ram SRT10 and a couple others. I'm also gonna buy a Landrover Defender and kit it out. :)

  • This car is insane. Just because they can: BMW

  • 0-60 in 4.3, that would dust a Viper

  • just bought one of these HOLY SHIT IS IT THE BEST CAR I HAVE EVER DRIVEN!!!!

  • drove at amelia island, was an amazing sounding ride.

  • horrible engine noise....despicable compared to a porsche or an amg

  • got this bad boy....it doesnt make much sense as a car, but if u drive it, u will love it...smoked some porches and amgs with it

  • What? The X5 diesel slalom better the X5 M? X5 diesel at 65.8 mph and the X5 M at 63.5 mph. With performance tire and race tune suspension, the more expensive more powerful X5 M corner slower than the X5 diesel. Common BMW.

  • least favorite sounding v8 by far. still super fast though, can't deny that.

  • I'd rather have the M5 Touring (station wagon). There's no need for this thing.

  • New 958 Cayenne Turbo performs better with lower hp! Porsche for life!

  • The slalom is much SLOWER than the DIESEL!

  • the thing that excites me the most is seeing the numbers this car pulls with the new 4.4L v8. if a 6000 pound car can go 0-60 in 4.5 imagine what a 4000 pound sedan can do with the more powerful version of this v8:))

  • Awesome!!!

  • i want to see the E53 X5 4.8is vs E70 X5 M

  • How popular is the BMW X5 in India?

  • pretty good for a station wagon

  • @psychocycledad station wagon WTF.. suv..

  • Comment removed

  • Awesome track numbers!!! I want myself a BMW X5 M!!!

  • Accelerates faster than the M5 E60 manual tested by IL.

  • I want this exact car in that exact color combo!

  • @kingfarticus SUV

  • Comment removed

  • @destin325 Dude best car ever!!!!

  • lemme get this right.... BMW X5M 0-60:4.2-4.5 60-0: 116ft skid: .91g 1/4 mi:12.8 but a "RACE CAR" the Corvette Zr1 is only .4 seconds faster to 60mph does .15 better on the skid pad stops 20 ft shorter and beats the SUV in the 1/4 mi by 1.3 seconds? with those numbers....sure you can get girls with a vette...but you can haul more of them with the suv...and if you are a family man...you can pack the kids up and still barely lose to a car that is considered "KING"
  • jesus thats faster than the m3 !

  • pointless car

  • The best of all the SUVs of this type but why do they have to exist?

  • what does w/ rollout mean?

  • @farzanjava you wont? I dont understand the stab at American Vehicles. Most of the people on youtube cant even afford anything above $30K and just for those of you who dont know that about a $650/month payment with nothing down or trade in. And the majority of you all are easily 14-25...

  • @psmTARDCORE how can you make a blanket statement about people on youtube not being able to afford anything more than $30k? what an ignorant, arrogant thing to say!

  • @timmy23apsb I said the majority. not ALL. and if you claim you can than lets see a vid of your $30,000+ vehicle you drive. Statistically speaking probably 65% of America can't even afford the luxury of owning one while our economy is in its current condition. and hell the number might even be higher than that.

  • @psmTARDCORE

    Maybe statistically speaking you are right, but the people watching this video have a higher chance of owning a BMW or some type of premium vehicle. Ex. I have an X5 M, so I am interested in looking at track footage.

  • i drive X3 and the price difference with x5 was about 20k

  • People from USA its stupid Fuc. xD BMW have 4.7sek. not 4.5

  • @bimes1987

    And you obviously doesn't own one because you would know that BMW takes the WORST 0-60 time results and take an average of them. SO basically BMW lies to you, lol, M3 is said to do 0-60mph in 4.7, but with launch control it does it in 4.3 ! My 135 doesn't do it in 5.2 it does it in 4.7 SO pls stop running your mouth when you have no idea...

  • @SimpsonvilleRecords Check Europ programs and i have 730Ld bu ha ha. Debil z Ameryki

  • @farzanjava uhhhhhh try the jeep srt8 or trailblazer ss both runn pretty much the same as that ..id take a srt8 before i take that beamer. Mad nice though

  • @bryboywalk

    I saw already a race between the SRT8 and the X6M the M won by a lot, it's somewhere on youtube you should check it out. And why would you take the SRT before the beamer? Beamer is obviously a heck of a lot nice, also better in cornering. Price?

  • AHHH I just came. Thank you BMW.

  • This is my baby!!!!!! das auto ist einfach geil!!!!!!

  • that's one sick suv. insanely sick

  • BMW please make this into a sedan that weighs 1000 lbs less and I will buy 1 !

  • I love performance of breaks ..But X6 M has 25% better performance of breaks than X5 M ..

  • WHat???

  • cool stats but not worth 85,000.

    I could get a gtr instead

  • my god u have it easy in ur country 85000$ barely buys u an a5 coupe here in lebanon this thing is nearly worth 180 grand here

  • @Miike92 I've been to dealerships and seen the sticker on a x6m it was $94,000 and $104,000 for a Nissan GTR. Now I know the GTR is faster but the X6m is faster with the Hammann Chip 670HP. That and the BMW will have maintenance included.

  • @m19921992 first of all faster and more horsepower is different. For example, a lamborghini may have more horsepower than a GTR, but the GTR is faster when tested on a track. Plus any suv or sport ultility over 60,000 is ridiculous.

  • @Miike92 Thoses are called Luxury SUVs. The only ones that aren't are American.

  • @AdrianC12345 i dont know what you are talking about

  • Seriously, I would expect any good SUV to go over 60K just because they're so big. And then if you say it's rediculous then that makes it even ore rediculous to buy a car over 60K.

  • @AdrianC12345 not really. An 85k suv is unpractical, its not like its a sports car.

  • Well, a sports car is a sports car, this is a sports car that can go in snow, carry your family and your dog. So it does make sense.

  • @AdrianC12345 first of all this is no sports car. At most it is a sport ultility vehicle. Why pay 85k for a sport utility when you can pay below 50k and save over 30k. BMW spent all their time on trying to put as much hosepower into this car that the downfall was the shitty mpg

  • Most sports cars do get bad MPGs and it's still cheaper than buying a sports car ans then buying an SUV. But then it's not like SUVs have good mpgs.

  • @AdrianC12345 it has lower than the usual which are under 50k.

    If you had 90k what would you do? Buy this sport utility? If so you are wasting your money away on this german garbage

  • under 50K are rubbish SUVs or just small ones, obviously you haven't driven this. What would you have done?

  • @AdrianC12345 not really. I have a 4runner its not big, and its pretty luxurious and has lots of features. 45k. Theirs no need to waste money on that type of car.

    If i had 90k i would get a sports car easy

  • Well yes a 4runner is a good car but even a regular X5 can get up to 90K. And as good as the 4 runner is it can't compete with the X5. Of course it wasn't meant to. But still, if I were to get an SUV it wouldn't be a cheap one, otherwise I'd get a luxury sedan or coupe or hatch. What do you think about the C30 R-Design?

  • @AdrianC12345 compete in what, horsepower? Because they are capable of doing the exact same thing. Is the c30 a suv?

  • No, the C30 is a hatchback, by Volvo. And by the 4runner not being able to compete, I meant by everything except off road capeability. But like I said the 4runner wasn't meant to, also it's half the price of the X5. My aunt has a 4 runner, but she wants a Sequoya( I don't know how to spell it) because of the 4runner's bard ride.

  • @AdrianC12345 im not really into hatchbakcs and suvs but i really like the infiniti fx35

  • Usually you have three + cars in the garage..and money is no issue buying this car.. MPG is a non issue..but I guess you factored that in your logic.

  • what else is their if you factor out those, just looks?

  • Confort, and dynamics.

  • id rather buy a super car with the money spent on this suv

  • yeah but this SUV is the top SUV there is in the market the x5 M will totally smoke the porche cayenne turbo and I've seen it smoking the Audi R8 v8 version so why would you buy this bad ass SUV right??? hahaha rhetorical question.....

  • BMW X5 M its a good car, I want have it !!!

    The drive this nice car its very easy !!! (y) (y)

  • @SuperAndreiy WTF are you talking about?

  • Engine sounds more like a Golf GTI.

    For a M V8 i wished it sounds abit like M3's v8

  • It looks very hot and the performance is incredible for its weight.

    BMW forever.

  • I bought my x5 3.0i in 2003 and its been a great V6 SAV.  I was thinking of buying the new 2010 Range Rove Sport Supercharge until I saw this X5 M5!! OMG! OMG! X5 M5 here I come!!

  • @jdelgado15 The x5 3.0i comes with a straight-6, not a V6.

    And the X5 M is 100% better on track than the Range Rover Sport will ever be.

    The X5 M has a 4.4 liter V8 offering 555 hp, while the Rover Sport will have a 5 liter v8 with only 510 hp.

    BMW= smaller engine, better performance.

    The BMW is more aerodynamic, and has a better, more sporty handling.

    Sport SUVs are pretty stupid, but if you want one, then the X5 M is the best choice.

  • this car is my dream

  • SICK 555hp!!

  • first of all......shut the fuk up. your an ignorant piece of sh¡t no merc suv on the planet earth can turn a lap time anyway near the bmw m suv line up and still be more comfortable to drive.

  • remember that porsche and audi makes cars like these too. i think they should all downsize a bit though

  • no you shut the fuck up!!!

    we have a bmw x5 m and i know how fast it is.

    all in the video is real and true!

    fuck tou asshole :@

  • @boostedbora haha im sorry but when it comes to comfort, the X5 M is awful. the seats are comfy for about 5 minuets, then the lack of support really takes a toll. yes its faster then a merc but god damn is it uncomfortable

  • @boostedbora ever heard of brabus?

  • @boostedbora Hooray subjectivity, don't be such a pompous ass.

  • @JohnSlonakiller Objectively, don't be a jealous fool. (Que you trying to justify yourself to wit I don't give a rats ass...... you are what you are)

  • @mathiastheok I'm quite satisfied with the vehicle I own, thank you.

  • beastly

  • InsideLine testing is bad. Road and Trach tested it at 4sec 0-60 and a 12sec 1/4mile at 112. This beat out the Cayenne Turbo S, and why wouldn't it? Its a BMW....the Ultimate Driving Machine.

  • CORVEETTE have you driven a BMW X5 ///M? No so shut the fuck up.

  • 116 feet braking distance is a 5000+ pounds suv? thats just crazy

  • I can bet one of my balls bmw will use this same twin turbo engine on the new m5

  • so it's the deal,you drive a V6 Camry and i get one of this , ok?

  • How does this have the same 0-60time and a better skid number then the BMW... M5?

  • Probably because of more HP and all wheel drive.

  • The x5 has a 5-series sedan base, unlike normal suvs which have a truck base. also, the engine is a 4.4L bi-turbo which gives it more torque than the M5. i have 2003 x5 4.4i and it is truly a great suv and a fun to drive even if it doesn't have the M badge!!!

  • the m5 is older now...u don't think in all that time they wudn't tweak their engineering? its a completely different engine with more horsepower and probably other changes to chassis, etc.

  • I'm not sure how BMW accomplished such a good skid pad number but it is amazing. The BMW M5 is from 2005 area that isn't "older" as you say, it is still has a world class engine it has: 5.0-liter, 40-valve V-10 engine with M high-pressure Double VANOS "steplessly" variable valve timing 10 individual throttle butterflies, electronically controlled G-sensitive semi-dry-sump lubrication, system Oil coolant heat exchanger,

    Digital Motor Electronics (DME). The M5 is good, the X5M is bettter :(

  • thats great...but how is 2005 not older? 5 years is a long time and since then, many other car companies answered the e60 m5...its performance isn't as unique/impressive now as it was in 2005...i think its the last car left in the bmw line up still from the chris bangle era and a new generation is coming...

  • I suppose 5 years could be awhile in car years. Bangle only annonced he would be leaving BMW this past February, so there is still the 6, 5, 3, 1 series, X5, and .. X3 with Bangles design incorperated into them but the 7 series has been replaced and the 5 series is almost here:D then the 3 and 6 sereis will be here in the next 2-3 years:) but i'm happy Bangle is gone.

  • the x5 m has 555 hp the m5 507

  • Comment removed

  • comparado com os carros dos seus outros videos esse é horrivel, mas mesmo assim eu adoro BMW

  • SUV doing 60 in 6.5?

    WTF is this world coming to?

  • 4.5

  • justforwatchingcraps

    Lol

    Sorry i know it was a typo!

  • still have yet to see any suv go through the slalom as hard as Acura's RDX, its the only SUV that I've driven that won't flip.

  • That skidpad number is amazing for a truck

  • Is this LA?! Shit, it's true it's SO polluted, how can you guys stand it?

    I'd rather ride an MX-5, sorry, girls that are worth don't like those heavy, mammoth, penis-extensions either...

  • "rather have Miata"

    Your lame

    zoom zoom zoom

  • Yeah, it's me who's lame and insecure...

    Enjoy your extension...

  • 1.09 where is that water dripping,is it the ac

  • residuals from being washed before the seen....I think

  • the .91g on the skidpad is more than all muscle cars can do. when are you yanks gonna start putting suspensions in your cars that are not from the 18th century?

  • you dont understand, the sub-par suspension is the fun part. It adds a sense of fear and requires more skill from the driver than an ///M suspension does.

  • We like truck axles in our sports cars and high ride height and big hoods and dash and seatbelts that cut into driver red neck.

  • the quater mile time is very impressive.

  • the exhaust sound like a subaru

  • der schluckt locker 25liter wenn du den kickst

  • fastest suv ever made, give bmw m some credit here guys, no other car company could have pulled that off, its faster than a diablo lambo for cryn out loud!

  • Hmmm, yeah its fast, but uhhh, I guess you missed Porsche doing this about 4 years ago.

  • what the hell was all that liquid dripping at 1:09 lol

  • just water from the the wet road they were using

  • just only residuals from being washed before the seen...

  • This is absolutely ridiculous. I don't think I'd ever track an SUV regardless. If I needed a family car I'd buy an M5, who would honestly need this thing? It dies nothing an M5 can't except haul a boat.

  • Absolutely agree!

    It is a car for showoffs, rich people who need status and people in the entertainment industry.

  • yeah... but its still a nice car

  • wut u talkn about? when have u ever seen anyone in the entertainment industry drive any bimmer other than a 7? these bimmers are what smart ppl with money buy...like doctors, lawyers,etc. u think a rapper or actor wud ever get an x5 or an m5 over an escalade or a lambo or even a merc?

    if i had the money and a family too big for an m5, i'd get this anyday...

  • fantastic performance for an suv, unfortunately it i still useless on a race track, i guarantee the brakes, tires, will start to give after 2 laps. For the road, fantastic, unfortunately nobody uses that kind of performance on the road

  • now they gotta test the x6m

  • I take the red inline 6 X6 TT 300hp and then do 370hp software, pipes, CAI, and M wheels.

  • People say this thing is pointless...but could you give me more versatility. It has, speed, comfort, size, handling, all weather safety, just a little off road capabilities, Et cetera . It's a bully that destroys traditional physics. There is a market... insane fools like me!

  • Of course the X6 M it is pointless. You can even say the X6 Xdrive50 with 400hp is too much for road use.

    Nobody is gonna go to the track with a X6. I you also want to go to the track you buy a M3, or M5.

  • what a beast!!!!!!

  • BMW answers that 6.1 Hemi SRT8 Jeep

  • Jeep SRT8 was never quite in the league that this BMW now competes in.

  • I will drive X6 and X5 2010 BMW cancer drive.

    Sometimes these cars don't meet expectations, ie 650i , X3, Z4 2.8, 328i e90

  • It's more like the answer to the Porsche Cayenne Turbo.

  • thats true.. but also it is faster than the cayenne turbo S

  • BMW has ride height control switch ?

    Cayenne Turbo S beat up a Skyline in Nuremberg ring.

  • What kind of Skyline?

    Like a 250GT Skyline?

  • Be a u tiful car! I'm afraid I'm still a die-hard rr kid still.

  • wow, those numbers are incredible. I'm no BMW guy, but a SUV that would hand sports cars their asses deserves some respect.

  • Wow! That thing is fast!

  • wow, impresive numbers

  • laws of physics....out the door.

  • i know... that is a m powered bmw x5, which is an suv obviously, but im impressed because i never seen an suv that can perform as fast as a sports car. well, its m power, which makes it less impressing, but a suv like that shouldn't be that fast for me. i think ill shit if i floor that beast.

  • they need to stiffer more the susp

  • X6 450hp TT

    ECU flash prob make 500hp.

    X6 300hp TT make 370hp ECU software.

    Cayenne needs update

  • you can moove your family with a roomy 5series or any same size sedan or station model if you need extra luggage space at the back. It makes war more sence to me.

    I don't see why you have to move in something tractor like high, especially when it is useless off road.

  • Roads in south have potholes and gravel , dirt and bad flood zones and snow. See why reason there.

    Myself drive M3 SMG conv, 330i, 944T.

    I would roll an SUV in a turn & eat up rotors and pads and gas.

    People buy these to win in a crash, period.

  • why 2010?

  • shittt man i've already ordered my x5 M its suppose to come at the end of october apparently. my current x5 (05 4.8is) has had only 2 problems since i've had it and it has 100K miles now. i had the starter and the window regulator replaced. thats all.

    so if you know the basics of maintaining a car, then BMW's shouldn't give you problems (well at least mine didn't)

  • both my e46 M & Conv window reg failed. Made in China town

  • "so if you know the basics of maintaining a car, then BMW's shouldn't give you problems"

    I've found that to be the case, i've never had a significant problem with any of my bimmers. Though i took my M3 in for repairs about 5 times in as many years all but one of them were due to minor nitpicky problems with light circuitry and the like. The only major one was a brake replacement which wasn't actually necessary, i merely thought they were getting a tad soggy.

  • Daaaaaaaaamn !!!

    X5 from hell !!

  • nice car, but m3 kicks ass

  • 90k damn and i was just starting to like it..... I'm better off buying a damn supercharger and pistons for my pathfinder and call it a day.

  • M3 is better!

  • The performance on this vehicle is surprisingly amazing. For one the quarter mile is 12.8 seconds, which is fabulous. To say a sports car doing 12.8 quarter mile is already good, but this is a SUV doing 12.8, which is just simply amazing.

    On the other hand "FerrariandBMW" you have a point that fast SUV is not useful. So I gave you a positive on the comment.

    I think its just for people that love the power, but have a big family, so a sedan just don't cut it for them (M3 sedan).

  • i want a x5 m pure style and sporty

  • is this car got better mpg compared to the monster E60 M5 ?

  • holy shit at the 0-60 and 1/4

  • thats so bad ass

  • Slalom and braking suck because it's a tall fat SUV!