@stanglemeier. The S Class scores over 9 a few times, but of course, the quality varied hugely year-by-year. The W210 was what I was maiinly talking about I guess. "Stfu"
You people are hella stupid, how is that Mercedes body kit not AMG?! Google w210 AMG and smack yourself across the face. That's a complete AMG body kit.
@ATGT5 hey bro that is a real E55, I know what the body kits look like. My family owns a Mercedes shop haha I know a lot about Mercedes. I myself own 3 amg's: 99 C43, 07 E63, and my baby S55 haha I love Mercedes.
@Acct1941 what makes u think u know all about cara like that. FYI the Chrysler 300c was based on the w210 e-class u dumb fuck. don't ever talk shit about Mercedes like that. Talk shit about bmw's idgaf, just not Mercedes. Mercedes is the most unique, expensive, luxurious, sexiest cars ever.
@stanglmeier The Mustang has never been a design leader, they've been taking hints from the '60s and rearranging them for decades. The 2012 Mercedes lineup is almost entirely ugly... Only the SLS, CL, and C, E Class are good looking. And the 2011 E Class seems to look weirder with age. The '12 CLS is a design travesty. Look at a 2002 XJR and see which you'd have. Or a 2002 M5, 540i... etc mutch better designs.
@Acct1941 the SLS first of all is very similar to the slk, the S class is almost identical to the E. The SL looks good aswell. The M5 doesnt look good at all, from every perspective. The only thing that was nice was the engines exhaust note. Don't even get me started about the jag. It is the same as a mustang, when you run out of ideas rebuild a 40 year old one. Has the same amount of modern details as a bicycle.
@stanglmeier The SLK is also handsome. (2005-2012) sorry I forgot. The E39 is great looking. The E62 is also an OK looking car. The XJ won L'Pia Bella Del Mondo award, so if it's good enough for Milan, styling-wise, it's good enough for me. That's why I own one. If you want, I know a lot about the mechanical engineering, and it was very advanced.A 1996 V8 engine design with quad cams, 32v, 75hp/Ltr, a solar-sensing climate control, 4 heated seats, variable ratio steering... PM for more argument?
@Acct1941 i can argue all day, the s class is known as the luxury car. Why are you brining up a 1996 vehical im comparing a 2002 XJR that you told me was better than the mercedes. The engine is nothing, a 2002 W211 has 469 hp. Thats 86 hp/litre. Jaguar has always been trying to compete with the luxury of mercedes and always fails. BMW and mercedes compete with eachother not jaguar. Cool you own a 1996 jaguar congrats on a decent car, but it doesn't mean its the best, don't be biased.r
@stanglmeier I don't own a '96 Lol I'm not a mechanic. The 2002 Normally aspirated car is faster than an S430 or S500. The 2002 XJR has 92.5hp/ litre. The standard car has the 75 hp/ L. The engine originally appeared in 1996 I'm saying, for the 1997 XK8. The luxury of an S-Class is comparable, many its features could be added to the Jag at an equivalent price. Remember, a 2002 XJ8 was about $61k, a S430 was $71,8k and that 10k these days has disappeared. Those door closers, air shocks all break
@Acct1941 regardless of price you pay for quality. Jaguars have the most breakdowns/repairs of all luxury vehicals. Im not saying a jaguar is a bad car by any sort of standards but a mercedes on paper is simply better. Hp/L has nothing to do with it, mercedes are faster than Jaguars, have better acceleration, and have better quality. Sure i agree in 1996 mercedes wasnt good looking, but no one cares about 1996. So if you read back you will see you randomly bring Jaguar into this argument. Stfu.
@stanglmeier Well, on the Jag thing, I listed off a bunch of comparable cars and you attacked the Jag. Which, mind you, placed 1st in a 2002 TG owner satisfaction survey, of all road cars, whereas Mercedes had the bottom 4 places, lower than Alfa Romeo even! Look at MSN auto owner ratings, Mercedes are all under 9/10. XJ all over 9.1 You're working off assumption, not reality. I didn't buy a merc because the 1/4mi are slower, 0-60 are slower, cost of ownership are higher. Also, uglier.
@Acct1941 lmfao name one jaguar a mercedes isnt faster than stfu MSN you're going by an indirect source that isn't valid with cars. Seriously you're an idiot. S65 amg destroys the living fuck out of any jaguar 5 door. The new XKRS is shit compared to an SL 65 AMG black series in all aspects of acceleration. You're goign off information that no one gives a fuck about. Are you proud you're jaguar was good in 96 and 02 MSN isn't even a reliable source use CAR & DRIVER or MOTER TREND or ROAD & TRACK
@stanglmeier My car wasn't out until 1998. The 2011 XJ Supersport, a 17 foot long car, does 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter in 12.2... that doesn't lose to anything. I am subscribed to them and Road and Track. How about S430 v. XJ8. S500 v. XJR. The S430 does 0-60 in 7.2s, the XJ8 in 6.6. The S500, 0-60 is in 6, but the XJR cost less and did 5.3. 2011 SL65=3.8 to 60, 2012 XKR-S=3.6 from C/D. The XKRS costs half as much. And the SL65 loses value fastest in class. MSN doesnt test acceleration ya prat
@ATGT5 no its an e55 amg w210 with a new bonnet giving it a new grill. thats why it looks different. also the rear bumper is the stock one you just cant see the exhaust pipes because of the video quality. it blatantly isnt a 320 because just listen its a v8
There are NOT to many Mustangs on the road that can take my w210 E55 (02)
take10daily 1 month ago
dvije velike hale koje se jedva krecu :P
ancho99993 1 month ago
More idiots arguing that wasn't an E55 the Mustang would not even be close to taking one off the line.
bikercrze1 2 months ago
OMG ...
moriss125 2 months ago
@stangkemeier, I never mentioned 1996. That is the year the AJ-V8 was released, but you just can't read into things. You weren't paying attention.
Acct1941 4 months ago
@stanglemeier. The S Class scores over 9 a few times, but of course, the quality varied hugely year-by-year. The W210 was what I was maiinly talking about I guess. "Stfu"
Acct1941 4 months ago
You people are hella stupid, how is that Mercedes body kit not AMG?! Google w210 AMG and smack yourself across the face. That's a complete AMG body kit.
916hyetxa1 4 months ago
@ATGT5 hey bro that is a real E55, I know what the body kits look like. My family owns a Mercedes shop haha I know a lot about Mercedes. I myself own 3 amg's: 99 C43, 07 E63, and my baby S55 haha I love Mercedes.
916hyetxa1 4 months ago
@Acct1941 what makes u think u know all about cara like that. FYI the Chrysler 300c was based on the w210 e-class u dumb fuck. don't ever talk shit about Mercedes like that. Talk shit about bmw's idgaf, just not Mercedes. Mercedes is the most unique, expensive, luxurious, sexiest cars ever.
916hyetxa1 4 months ago
lol MB ftw!
DeathMetalSKUNK 4 months ago
It may win, but both fail in a crucial way: 1.) Merc E-Class W210 is the ugliest car ever made, 2.) Mustang is what high school kids drive.
Acct1941 5 months ago
@Acct1941 the e-class w210 is made in 2002, look at a 2002 mustang. its 10 years old look at the new mercedes now.
stanglmeier 4 months ago
@stanglmeier The Mustang has never been a design leader, they've been taking hints from the '60s and rearranging them for decades. The 2012 Mercedes lineup is almost entirely ugly... Only the SLS, CL, and C, E Class are good looking. And the 2011 E Class seems to look weirder with age. The '12 CLS is a design travesty. Look at a 2002 XJR and see which you'd have. Or a 2002 M5, 540i... etc mutch better designs.
Acct1941 4 months ago
@Acct1941 the SLS first of all is very similar to the slk, the S class is almost identical to the E. The SL looks good aswell. The M5 doesnt look good at all, from every perspective. The only thing that was nice was the engines exhaust note. Don't even get me started about the jag. It is the same as a mustang, when you run out of ideas rebuild a 40 year old one. Has the same amount of modern details as a bicycle.
stanglmeier 4 months ago
@stanglmeier The SLK is also handsome. (2005-2012) sorry I forgot. The E39 is great looking. The E62 is also an OK looking car. The XJ won L'Pia Bella Del Mondo award, so if it's good enough for Milan, styling-wise, it's good enough for me. That's why I own one. If you want, I know a lot about the mechanical engineering, and it was very advanced.A 1996 V8 engine design with quad cams, 32v, 75hp/Ltr, a solar-sensing climate control, 4 heated seats, variable ratio steering... PM for more argument?
Acct1941 4 months ago
@Acct1941 i can argue all day, the s class is known as the luxury car. Why are you brining up a 1996 vehical im comparing a 2002 XJR that you told me was better than the mercedes. The engine is nothing, a 2002 W211 has 469 hp. Thats 86 hp/litre. Jaguar has always been trying to compete with the luxury of mercedes and always fails. BMW and mercedes compete with eachother not jaguar. Cool you own a 1996 jaguar congrats on a decent car, but it doesn't mean its the best, don't be biased.r
stanglmeier 4 months ago
@stanglmeier I don't own a '96 Lol I'm not a mechanic. The 2002 Normally aspirated car is faster than an S430 or S500. The 2002 XJR has 92.5hp/ litre. The standard car has the 75 hp/ L. The engine originally appeared in 1996 I'm saying, for the 1997 XK8. The luxury of an S-Class is comparable, many its features could be added to the Jag at an equivalent price. Remember, a 2002 XJ8 was about $61k, a S430 was $71,8k and that 10k these days has disappeared. Those door closers, air shocks all break
Acct1941 4 months ago
@Acct1941 regardless of price you pay for quality. Jaguars have the most breakdowns/repairs of all luxury vehicals. Im not saying a jaguar is a bad car by any sort of standards but a mercedes on paper is simply better. Hp/L has nothing to do with it, mercedes are faster than Jaguars, have better acceleration, and have better quality. Sure i agree in 1996 mercedes wasnt good looking, but no one cares about 1996. So if you read back you will see you randomly bring Jaguar into this argument. Stfu.
stanglmeier 4 months ago
@stanglmeier Well, on the Jag thing, I listed off a bunch of comparable cars and you attacked the Jag. Which, mind you, placed 1st in a 2002 TG owner satisfaction survey, of all road cars, whereas Mercedes had the bottom 4 places, lower than Alfa Romeo even! Look at MSN auto owner ratings, Mercedes are all under 9/10. XJ all over 9.1 You're working off assumption, not reality. I didn't buy a merc because the 1/4mi are slower, 0-60 are slower, cost of ownership are higher. Also, uglier.
Acct1941 4 months ago
@Acct1941 lmfao name one jaguar a mercedes isnt faster than stfu MSN you're going by an indirect source that isn't valid with cars. Seriously you're an idiot. S65 amg destroys the living fuck out of any jaguar 5 door. The new XKRS is shit compared to an SL 65 AMG black series in all aspects of acceleration. You're goign off information that no one gives a fuck about. Are you proud you're jaguar was good in 96 and 02 MSN isn't even a reliable source use CAR & DRIVER or MOTER TREND or ROAD & TRACK
stanglmeier 4 months ago
@stanglmeier My car wasn't out until 1998. The 2011 XJ Supersport, a 17 foot long car, does 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter in 12.2... that doesn't lose to anything. I am subscribed to them and Road and Track. How about S430 v. XJ8. S500 v. XJR. The S430 does 0-60 in 7.2s, the XJ8 in 6.6. The S500, 0-60 is in 6, but the XJR cost less and did 5.3. 2011 SL65=3.8 to 60, 2012 XKR-S=3.6 from C/D. The XKRS costs half as much. And the SL65 loses value fastest in class. MSN doesnt test acceleration ya prat
Acct1941 4 months ago
Comment removed
NIGHTMARE5008 7 months ago
Mercedes-Benz power!!!
BMWJony95 7 months ago 6
its the E55 AMG press pause at 0:11 you can see emblems on both sides and the tailights are a dead giveaway they are lightly tinted
Lambo0225 10 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA the mercedes NOT DRAGSTER fucked the dragster
Tommynatorium 1 year ago
dude this is not the E55 front and rear bumper are not from AMG.. maybe its E320
ATGT5 1 year ago
@ATGT5 no its an e55 amg w210 with a new bonnet giving it a new grill. thats why it looks different. also the rear bumper is the stock one you just cant see the exhaust pipes because of the video quality. it blatantly isnt a 320 because just listen its a v8
justicebmxski345 5 months ago
its not the E55 AMG but mercedes won
ATGT5 1 year ago
@ATGT5
Do not you know do not tell
its e55
DimaAMG 1 year ago 4
@ATGT5 It is the E55 of the W210 series.
Mlowery85 1 year ago
that is abusive compare it with a e 63 amg or even better with a 63 biturbo brabus
dagc99 1 year ago
The car in that vid isn't an E55... most likely an E430. It does not have the E55 bodykit or exhaust....
syntaxfeline 2 years ago
Comment removed
JelsT5 2 years ago
fuck dat
utubenz576 2 years ago