Added: 2 years ago
From: bblcsedona
Views: 7,556
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • As a Christian, I'm trying to study what all the major New Age nut marshals are all studying. I know, it's crazy, but I'm having fun. I'm divorced now so just tell me another story so I can sleep. Thanks. Physics class used to put me right to sleep, this is my latest gold mine! You must be so proud. No, I'm kidding. This is the best info I've run into a good long while. The outside of the box people make better friends, they're the smartest. Some of this is truly brilliant!

  • The best evidence in the debate between science vs God, is how people defend their scientific theory the same as believers defend their God.

    Everything and everyone are connected.

    The joke is on us - the more we argue the tighter we become connected through dialogue.

    Now someone please go write an equation for that.

  • The issue is uniting the seat of mass with the source and sink of gravitation. This is one of the "Elephant In The Room" questions of modern physics. I believe Mr Haramein has made a very good attempt at answering it

  • For all people who say Nassims theory is junk,why dont you build your own theory? You wouldnt do better,would you,you pseudocientists?!?!? SO, STFU!!! Dont say bullshit,because YOU KNOW NOTHING! Go open your heart first and learn about the basic sacred geometry and then you may try understand Nassims science.Or just stick your head in the sand!

  • @MiNdLoUkA glad to see the few that are actually awake with eyes open, but we dont need eyes to see , we need vision ;)

  • Genuine genius eludes the fool

  • Technology is dangerous in the hands of those that do not understand they are one and the same process as the universe.

  • i love him

  • this is what you want /watch?v=D8IcciRHGvQ&feature=r­elated

    bunch of bigots

  • This guy is NOT a physicist, he is a Podunk philosopher. He's trying to present himself as Garrett Lisi or an early Einstein, when in fact he's closer to L. Ron Hubbard.

    I wish YT allowed links in a comment, but you can Google this guy's "coveted award" yourself and see that it's just a certificate for presenting "best paper" at a COMPUTING CONFERENCE; no physicists present, no peer-review, totally ignored by the scientific community.

    This charlatan's only real skill seems to be storytelling.

  • @sincristo then shut up, dont steal his scene, its not yout time to be famous... lol

    sincristo, i dont care if he is a physicist or dentist... but if he was my friend, i would like to sit and hear him all day, if you were my friend i would ask you to shut up because what you have to say wont change a thing

  • @sergiobrejo And if you were my friend, which I can't say is really within the realm of plausibility, I'd teach you epistemology.

    The fact that you can't tell--or don't care about--the difference between physics and dentistry is exactly what these charlatans are banking on. You should send them money.

  • @sincristo realy? i think we can be good friends. epistemology is a concept, you could teach me the facts that make this concept bomb haramein... name his mistakes, point the real track

    then ill put some epistemology on you, are you a dentist?

  • @sincristo I can tell by your reaction he must have really hit a nerve with you. Don't worry yourself, its natural for the mind to reject and fight against something which threatens change to the status quo. Take care.

  • @sonofhendrix "must have really hit a nerve" - Correct. I do indeed loath pseudo-scientific charlatans such as Haramein. As for the status quo, thanks for you concern. However, I'd love to see it changed in a number of ways, particularly through actual scientific advancement.

    BTW, it's also natural for human beings to believe whatever they're told, even with no evidence whatsoever, as long as it's couched in complex jargon. So don't be too hard on yourself when you realize this guy's a fraud.

  • @sincristo whatever you say, but there is real maths behind this theory, hes not just doing it for fun you know.

  • @sonofhendrix No, he's not just doing it for fun. He's doing it for self-aggrandizement, at the expense of actual understanding of actual science. The "maths" behind his "work" are low-grade, very basic grad-level stuff, couched in sophisticated-sounding jargon that is, from a physics standpoint, basically nonsense. If you want to allow yourself to be lied to, that's your business. But I have every right to point out that this guy is a fraud... because he is.

  • @sincristo

    Also. If he's so brain-dead, why do you go to the trouble of watching his interviews? Weird approach, if you ask me. Wasting your precious time in front of youtube, listening to someone you yourself have labelled a charlatan. Why don't you watch something else?

  • @5147848amp One reason only: I care about real science and science literacy, especially in the United States, where it has fallen to an embarrassing low. People like this have a negative effect on scientific literacy, because many out there who don't know much about how science works take what they say seriously.

    If he wasn't undermining science, I wouldn't care a bit.

  • @sincristo

    But he tells a good story. Why not try telling your own instead of lambasting others?

  • @5147848amp well said, although ive done heavy research and belive nassim is right also.

  • @sincristo and U r ???? ooh ok nobody !

  • this guy is a genius

  • WTF! I gave this guy a chance and I want my 3:42 back. This is not science this is taking theoretical physics and philosophizing, or better yet pondering and stretching the ideas of people who actually crunch numbers.

  • small capsule on the top.,.. we light the bottom up and then prey... :DDD at space its just poof.. small ejaculation :DDDD he is just brilliant !!!!

  • Brilliant indeed! He took the veil off things for me....i just cant beleive that some of you people STILL cant see after that!

  • Comment removed

  • No efekten, genuine science is that which has empirical evidence, is testable, and WORKS. Nassim's drivel is junk science.

  • @zybyl like string theory?

  • @zybyl You're a jackass! Jealous you don't know anything! You're a jealous parrot.

  • genuine science..

    what a joke, zybill..

    thats a bunch of repeaters with big egos.

  • What did the inca "know"?

  • Inca and other have known this for long time. Glad to see we are re-opening ourselves to this possibility. Infinite possibilites...

  • Meaningless woo-speak. This sort of drivel goes on and on and on and on. It never goes anywhere! He will still be rambling on like this in 10 or 20 years time. During that time genuine science will have forged ahead making real discoveries.

  • Comment removed

  • you again? i am telling you to name nassims error and to explain why is he wrong?! if you can't do that, than you are just another youtube troll spammer. have a nice day.

  • ur a 3D person, u can't understand the 5D world, tha'ts how life works, u just need to grow more, just belive ur tv news and goverment scientist

  • @lukeskywalkers73 The most inteligent answer here...Hope the 3D person/people understands it :-)

  • like finding the absolute particles that compose our universe? What's a real discovery?

  • genuine science has been stuck for more than 20 years in terms of the field he is involved in..look at QM Nassim practically blew it out of the water into outer space. And without him Einteins field equation would have never been unified!!

  • BRILLIANT MAN,I LOVE HIM.

  • he's a 'likeable' guy.

  • I simply looove this man...thank you!.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more