@gearsofhalo2 Its a little simpler than that. Just some Higher Group Symmetry, basic quartonian expansion with algebraic topology and 6 Vector points. Notice it is a Cube with each sides center meeting in the center of the cube.
Wow. this is fascinating you have come up with this shape. i recognize it from this geometry figure called the star tetrahedron. it is a double platonic solid, two interlocking equilateral triangular prisms or tetrahedrons that fit into and make the shape of a cube. you can see the two shapes laced within the cube by standing it up on one of its points. a shape known in the ancient world Sacred Geometry, which in antiquity tells the story of how our universe became manifest.
That's what I always thought the universe looked like. Though I believed that black holes were just "tears" in the thinner parts of it (due to start explosions) that lead to newer or older parts of the universe causing you to travel either forward or backward through time.
like waves ? ripples? when you say universe, do you refere to the be all and end all, or would that have probability of being multiple infinately? ? as tbh thats the essence this existance gives me? no matter how big you think it will be bigger type gig?
Gravitational Waves, Time Ripples. When I say Universe I mean the Container that holds all the Visible Galaxies and matter in our perspective. String Theory calculates the multiverse at 10 to the
500th in number. To understand just how big the SuperSystem watch this video series on the Mandlebrot Set:
Here are some links to help you better grasp the true nature of the universe the
1st is a 4pt series called The Electric Universe:
/watch?v=V026kSw4XCs
The second is a 45part (8hour lecture)
by Nassim Haramein he explains how current scientist use RENORMILAZATION to balance their equations. Thats why I wont say its a Giant Black Hole at the center of the Galaxies.
Quaternion math...See David Hestenes Geometric Calculus..Grassman's extension theory is an expansion on Hamiltons work. Problem is what does scalar REALLY imply. Thomas Bearden..I like just for kicks, but he mixes up a lot of the REAL physics with conjecture based on some experiment.
in the common nature of homofuckingdumbshit (homo,fucking,dumb,shit) it is widespread that crackpot theries are made from people with a high imagination spectum resulting in fucked up followers and more fucked up theries. hahahahah i sounded smart
between the universes is where the false vacuum exsists and where all the electricity is store this is called the time domain.also all the dark matter which blocks our view of the other spacial fronts
universes as says string theory so outside would mean a different universe.The energy (electricity) is stored in this false vacuum between the universes. Dipoles will create the scalar resinations need to release the energy into this domain, with higher group symmetry this utilizes the heaviside component.Read Oliver Heaviside and Nikola Tesla. You will find you have been lied to about the nature of electricity. the multiverse looks like soap bubbles.
imagine a bomb going off in a cave where there are lots of different tunnels connected together and leading to the surface. at the point of detination the force created will travel throught the open tunnels quicker than throught the rock itself. This would mean that the big bangs rate of exspansion effectively was slowed down.The density of the multiverse would dictate this rate.
no no no, marcuso, your a f*****g idiot. this man is just saying a bunch of crap. do you hear him. he sounds like a retard. he is just saying a bunch of random stuff to sound smart. Jesus. oh wait , you dont believe in that.
that´s a nice model of the universe we live in. as a physisist i agree with you that this kind of model is a much better representation of our universe than the cyclic model, although i think that your model isn´t complex enough... but anyway, thanx for that expalination. well done!
in that all 6 spacial points of movement are represented minus the time location because matter was being ejected into this universe at 2000 times the speed of light. Read Oliver Heaviside and Nicola teslas writings on gravitational waves also called scalar,theta,phi,tesla waves these are massless, quiadronian math and higher albebraic topography group symetry. .
Who is this guy, really? Carl Spackler from Caddyshack?! "Cinderella boy, outta nowhere, a former greenskeeper now about to become a physisict."
mceltix2011 3 months ago
Nice explanation, but you sound like you don't give a crap about what you're talking about.
CodyRicheson 1 year ago
yes it looks an awful lot like the universe LOL
seethelightofgod 1 year ago
in what theory is this shape based?, looks like the calabi-yau manifolds of string theory.
gearsofhalo2 1 year ago
@gearsofhalo2 Its a little simpler than that. Just some Higher Group Symmetry, basic quartonian expansion with algebraic topology and 6 Vector points. Notice it is a Cube with each sides center meeting in the center of the cube.
BrainChild Out...
BrainChild666 1 year ago
Wow. this is fascinating you have come up with this shape. i recognize it from this geometry figure called the star tetrahedron. it is a double platonic solid, two interlocking equilateral triangular prisms or tetrahedrons that fit into and make the shape of a cube. you can see the two shapes laced within the cube by standing it up on one of its points. a shape known in the ancient world Sacred Geometry, which in antiquity tells the story of how our universe became manifest.
Mattobby 2 years ago
That's what I always thought the universe looked like. Though I believed that black holes were just "tears" in the thinner parts of it (due to start explosions) that lead to newer or older parts of the universe causing you to travel either forward or backward through time.
twilightvengance 2 years ago
i thought the universe was more of a horse saddle shape but what dose one person know?
Senteinal117 2 years ago
Notice that each side of the model shown here is, on its own, an inverted saddle shape. Like a fifth dimensional hour glass. Great Observation.
BrainChild Out............
BrainChild666 2 years ago
"It rubs the lotion on it's skin"
wareaglemartin 2 years ago 3
@wareaglemartin You are gonna dig this!
/watch?v=Sz4ErXYlWY4
BrainChild Out
BrainChild666 1 year ago
@BrainChild666 Hell yeah that's great.
wareaglemartin 1 year ago
please do a video of Carl Spackler (Bill Murray) quotes from the movie Caddyshack... you sound just like him. haha
ThinkingLeft 2 years ago
big hitter, the Lama
gunga lagunga.
jdkhanlian 1 year ago
future !!!!!!!!!
future + verb
allah said :{ We will show them Our signs in the universe and within their own beings until it will become manifest to them that it is the truth }
quraan 41/53
thecosmology 2 years ago
Thank you. We will defeat hatred and violence by not resembling it.
Love and Compassion
BrainChild Out.......
BrainChild666 2 years ago
like waves ? ripples? when you say universe, do you refere to the be all and end all, or would that have probability of being multiple infinately? ? as tbh thats the essence this existance gives me? no matter how big you think it will be bigger type gig?
non science personell!
;]
longded 2 years ago
Gravitational Waves, Time Ripples. When I say Universe I mean the Container that holds all the Visible Galaxies and matter in our perspective. String Theory calculates the multiverse at 10 to the
500th in number. To understand just how big the SuperSystem watch this video series on the Mandlebrot Set:
/watch?v=qB8m85p7GsU&feature=related
Your Question is answered in part 1 at
3min and 25sec.
Welcome to the Fractal Universe.
BrainChild Out............
BrainChild666 2 years ago
It's sort of elegant isn't it?
HerOdyssey 2 years ago
Excellent representation of the 'Physical Universe'!
The 'shape' of the universe implies that the universe itself is bound to 3d reality since all shapes are of the material plane.
Shape is the closest thing we have to put the universe 'in context,' in relation to your location in that universe.
Awesome Vid!
TheRealVerbz 3 years ago
some one has to ask this question,
so what do you think is in the centre of the galaxy
tammy713910 3 years ago
Here are some links to help you better grasp the true nature of the universe the
1st is a 4pt series called The Electric Universe:
/watch?v=V026kSw4XCs
The second is a 45part (8hour lecture)
by Nassim Haramein he explains how current scientist use RENORMILAZATION to balance their equations. Thats why I wont say its a Giant Black Hole at the center of the Galaxies.
watch?v=pPgII_4ciFU&feature=PlayList&p=88EDD1895A2F5587&index=0&playnext=1
Let me know what ya think.
BrainChild Out...
BrainChild666 2 years ago
Quaternion math...See David Hestenes Geometric Calculus..Grassman's extension theory is an expansion on Hamiltons work. Problem is what does scalar REALLY imply. Thomas Bearden..I like just for kicks, but he mixes up a lot of the REAL physics with conjecture based on some experiment.
topos100 3 years ago
Reading through David Hestenes work seems mostly theroretical,
has he done anything deterministic/ experimental to
validate his assumptions? I think scalar implies "thought waves" based
on intent and potentials. They have identified both Chronon (time particle)
and graviton (gravity particle) why not imaginon (thought particle).
Which of Beardons works mix up experiment with conjecture? Beardon is
a die hard deteminist and believes in data to back up his Supersystems principals.
BrainChild666 2 years ago
the graviton remains hypothetical, and the chronos? havent heard that before.
gearsofhalo2 1 year ago
Please don't play with the universe otherwise it will collapse into you ass
LearningAutomata 3 years ago
I always had a hunch that's what the universe looked like
richd506 3 years ago 2
funny, so did i. only i imagined it to be of a somewhat darker shade
skinstrip 3 years ago
and so in holding that model universe; you must be standing in the 11th dimension, no?
newmac 3 years ago
I dont think its dimensional. In your question, I'm holding the "universe" in
my hands (this paradigm excludes inflationary
theory and is completely hypothetical) so
instead of a dimesional barrier being crossed
its more an observer having and omniperspective view point.Dimensions are weird and complicated.
BrainChild666 3 years ago
in the common nature of homofuckingdumbshit (homo,fucking,dumb,shit) it is widespread that crackpot theries are made from people with a high imagination spectum resulting in fucked up followers and more fucked up theries. hahahahah i sounded smart
supersweetman 3 years ago
between the universes is where the false vacuum exsists and where all the electricity is store this is called the time domain.also all the dark matter which blocks our view of the other spacial fronts
BrainChild666 3 years ago
So, what would happen if one attempted to go "outside" the universe?
fortunne 3 years ago
The multiverse consists of 10 to the 500th
universes as says string theory so outside would mean a different universe.The energy (electricity) is stored in this false vacuum between the universes. Dipoles will create the scalar resinations need to release the energy into this domain, with higher group symmetry this utilizes the heaviside component.Read Oliver Heaviside and Nikola Tesla. You will find you have been lied to about the nature of electricity. the multiverse looks like soap bubbles.
BrainChild666 3 years ago
imagine a bomb going off in a cave where there are lots of different tunnels connected together and leading to the surface. at the point of detination the force created will travel throught the open tunnels quicker than throught the rock itself. This would mean that the big bangs rate of exspansion effectively was slowed down.The density of the multiverse would dictate this rate.
BrainChild666 3 years ago
aha.....
so it is the multivers
comosicusguitar 3 years ago
whay is has the univers that form and does not hav another? this is not the tipical expansion of a explosion....
comosicusguitar 4 years ago
no no no, marcuso, your a f*****g idiot. this man is just saying a bunch of crap. do you hear him. he sounds like a retard. he is just saying a bunch of random stuff to sound smart. Jesus. oh wait , you dont believe in that.
EpiCon3iZSicK 4 years ago
that´s a nice model of the universe we live in. as a physisist i agree with you that this kind of model is a much better representation of our universe than the cyclic model, although i think that your model isn´t complex enough... but anyway, thanx for that expalination. well done!
marcuso 4 years ago
The symetry is quit provoking
in that all 6 spacial points of movement are represented minus the time location because matter was being ejected into this universe at 2000 times the speed of light. Read Oliver Heaviside and Nicola teslas writings on gravitational waves also called scalar,theta,phi,tesla waves these are massless, quiadronian math and higher albebraic topography group symetry. .
BrainChild666 4 years ago
That is great! Thank you SO much for posting! I gave you 5 stars!
taoworm23 4 years ago
Uh. What?
SardonicusRexx 4 years ago