I'm unsubscribing to this channel, i cannot bare to educate you any further in regards to foreign relations. Hopefully you now understand that your statement "There is no doubt that Bush would nuke any country" is in fact grosly incorrect. This was my intention. If you do not, you are blinded by the very scholars you seek to preceive global phenomena by; and as a result you have become increasingly closed minded towards anyone who would say otherwise. Your viewers need to acknowledge this.
Imperial war has been America's policy for over a century, since the Spanish American war and the mass murder of people in the Philippines. The war in Viet Nam killed 4 million Southeast Asians.
I will soon do a video on presidential candidate John McCain's record as a war criminal. In 23 bombing missions over North Viet Nam he killed civilians intentionally as part of a policy to terrorize people with: anti personel pellets, napalm, bombs & rockets. Invasion &Killing civilians is a war crime.
Will that be like when America was attacked by Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Panama, Iraq I, Afganistan & Iraq II? We attacked all 10 without rhyme or reason - 10 war crimes.
According to American Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the most serious war crime is to attack another country because all other war crimes stem from that war crime. Justice Jackson was a judge at the Nuremburg war crime trials.
Why would R or C attack the USA? R & C own America.
Russia wishes they owned us, China has us by the balls economically and if China joined the world community and pulled off some war crimes BS and sanctioned America, our economy would collapse. You are crazy, you are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theories I bet you could write a book on it.
Yep, that's what I am saying. There is no doubt the government will want you to work for them. However, in the 1960's the FBI would not take immigrants or first generation Americans. I am sure this has changed, but you may wish to check.
Oh, are you a bona fide indigenous Indian? The rest of us are immigrants. When the English immigrated the Indians should have asked to see their papers (immigration or tourist visas).
When you say "we" own the country, who is the "we" you refer to. Genocide is not considered a war. Our American predecessors mass murdered the Indians.
The Indians just won almost $1 billion in a court decision this week. The were seeking $47 billion and will appeal to the Supreme Court. The many American governments did not respect a single one of the hundreds of treaties it signed with the Indian. So much for the Anglo American sense of authenticity.
Hasn't Bush told us many times Vladamir is just like him, a good ole boy. Yes, both Bush & Putin are fascists - two peas in a pod, two sides of the same coin. They both steal elections. See my YouTube video on "How Bush Stole Two Elections."
Oh, I thought Vldamir slapped Bush in the face when he had his tanks run all over Bush's favorite ally. Bush encouraged the Georgians to invade South Osetia. The Georgians believed Bush would have the American Air Force defend Georgia with precision bombing of Russian troops & tanks.
Of course, the American Power Elite understand the new Russian military doctrine. If American precision bombing is used, they will use tactical nukes that they have on missles with their attacking force.
Bush would nuke Russia before Russia even contemplated it, unfortunately our next pansy president will not do anything and we will be attacked and crippled, watch and see, its not all conspiracy, there are countries who would love to reduce our super power status under the right circumstances. by the way After Iraq our military efforts will be on Venezuela, watch and see.
There is no doubt Bush would nuke any country. He has already considered using nukes on Iraq. Are you calling Senator John McCain a pansey? No conutry need reduce America. Bush has done the job for those countries. B-boy has destroyed the US Army and the US Constitution. What remains?
I am betting B-boy attacks Iran before he leaves office. No troops will be used because there isn't much of the American army left - much like after our defeat in Viet Nam.
Indeed, but that has nothing to do with deterrence, at all. The proliferation of nukes to these 'empires' creates a situation that results in their nonuse, due to MAD. Please provide an example of how nuclear deterrence has not worked. You cannot. Resulting in your statement about america nuking "any country" incorrect in the highest degree.
America nuked Japan twice and threatened to nuke China and others. Bush is a stupid maniac who would nuke any country he could not bully with words.
In any case, we have moved from the topic of Bush's torturing and lying. Why do you have a problem with someone being in disagreement with you? You are typically American.
Those are not examples of a failed deterrence, and MacArthur was dismissed by Truman as a result of his ill concieved advice on china, which arose cuz china was sending 'volunteer' troops into Nkorea during the war in 53-54. I feel the need to correct your mistakes, so that you take more care when attempting to state foreign policy objectives of regimes. You're statement of Bush 'nuking any country' would provok mockery among the politically scienctic community, i wish to spare you from this.
I am unable to understand your point. You appear to be in favor of American Empire: militarism, colonialism & imperialism. You support the American Empire's use of nuclear weapons to bully others and remain the only superpower.
I do not support Empire, militarism, colonialism & imperialism. Just as the quest of Empire destroyed the Roman Republic, the American Empire builders have destroyed the American republic, ideals & values.
You write America resisted attacking China with nukes in the 1950's. In fact, President Eisenhower threatened China with nuclear bombing in the mid 1950's over Taiwan.
Please don't worry about what academic hacks think of me. I have the ego strength to not care about what others think. I pursue truth without regard to hacks. I read and rely on the best scholars.
At the time, Tawain was the UN's legitimate seat of China's gov't. The taiwan strait was where the line of containment had been drawn for the PRC. The strategy of containment is firm, cautious and attentive to threats and relative power. it rests on kennan's logic that the internal changes needed to makes china less of a threat and more democratic are more likely to occur if the country's external ambitions are contained and the system is thus forced to fall on its own contradictions.
This threat was supposed to be viewed as very credible, as to deter china. Would US have actually bombed them? i don't think so, cuz china and russia has sino-soviet treaty, which would have sparked a world war3, since it binded them to come to eatchother's aid if attacked by an outside power. Nevertheless, it worked, allowing for a 'cold peace' to take place between china and taiwan. I wouldn't have wanted it any other way to be honest. ^_~b
Events in the Taiwan strait unfolded because China has better leadership then America. Cho En Lai may have been the finest political strategist the world has known. As a Chinese he took the long view. He knew, in time Taiwan would revert to Chinese control.
When asked by Henry Kissinger what he thought about the French revolution, Cho En Lai said: "It's to early to tell."
You have justified American Imperial policy by parroting the policy. You are an apologist for the Power Elite.
America was protecting it's corrupt petty tyrant - Chang Kai Chek. In fact, China has never had any external ambitions in it's 5000 year history according to Harvard Professor John K. Fairbank testifying before the American Senate's Foreign Relations Committee in February 1966. Kennan was wrong about China's external ambitions (the Domino Theory).
I am simply in favour of using the Rational Actor Model to link the purpose and action of a given administration. Using this scientific process, i am able to fully explain the actions in terms of the goals. the history of contemporary foreign policy is simply the best strategy option in terms of military objectives at the given time. I am voting for the Green Party, I am Canadain, and I study these issues at university. I am what your 'typical american' should wish to aspire to!
You are propagandized, much like the typical American. Professor Noam Chomsky explains the American (i.e. Canadian) propaganda model. As an aspiring academic, you must inculcate the values of the terror states (USA & Canada).
stop being so childish. I have successfully demonstrated legitimate reasons for the points i have forwarded. you on the other hand keep adding new dimensions to the debate. I can just as easily accuse you of being a 'propaganda machine' in the ultra liberal communist sense. But i don't, i'm beyond name calling and ad homeinens. Canada a terror state? Please.
Your arrogance is only exceeded by your haughtiness. You must be from money.
Canada is in Afghanistan terrorizing the natives. Canadians are throwing away Canadian lives to genuflect to American Imperial power - a flunky state & people.
As an Irishman with an Irish passport, I consider all Anglo Saxons terrorists. This would include those of other nationalities who live under the dominance of Anglo Saxons (i.e. Anglophiles).
We have no enemies. Nukes are used to threaten weak countries like Iraq & Iran, while trying to intimidate China & Russia. Rather then deter war, the nukes are inducing war by giving the Ameriican Empire builders false courage to threaten others.
Neo Conservative Empire builders have used (1.) torture (2.) mass murder (3.) Cultural destruction. Chalmers Johnson makes these points in chapter 1 of his book "Nemesis."
I advise you to read "The IMagined Community" by Benedict Anderson. You keep talking about "we" as if every American citizen or everybody living in the US approves of what you say.
The thing is, I really do not see anything wrong with torture short of ripping of limbs or committing torture acts reminiscence of the dark ages, you know using stuff like the Iron Maiden. I honestly believe torture is a necessary tactic to win any war, water boarding is perfect. The person feels like hes drowning but isn't. There isn't anything MORALLY wrong with that kind of torture. give me a break.
you should watch "Watch Christopher Hitchens Get Waterboarded." since it's clear you won't read the books. i'm sure you have a few minutes to watch it, at least. you might change your mind. i'd also love to know where you came up with that priceless platitude that torture is necessary to win any war. where'd you get that one goebbels, goring, pinochet, the shah?
you seem to be to dim to understand how torture affects the psyche. apparently in your little fantasy world psychological trauma is no big deal. unfortunately, in the real world psychological trauma can in many ways be much worse in the long run. i guess i must be passive since i don't delight in others' suffering. and i must be a commie because i don't understand how torture "wins" illegal occupations. woe is me. i guess i'll never be a good, freedom-loving, all-american neo-fascist.
Rather then a "commie" analysis' yours is a comic book analysis. Cartoons are fine for kids and G-men, but not for those concerned about American values & war crimes.
You say you doubt Bush "tortures anyone." Then you advocate torture.
The French used waterboarding massively in Algeria & lost the most violent of all wars. War crime is not a winner. It makes devoted enemies.
American war criminals have, in fact, used "blunt force trauma" to kill war prisoners - an Iraqi air force general.
No, the french lost because they don't know how to win! You want to know why I don't care about torture? If I am captured you can guarantee I'll be beheaded. They are guaranteed 3 meals and some good "new fashion" waterboarding, I DONT CARE ABOUT THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ramification.
A G-man can be employed by any of the many hundreds of government bureaucracies designed to spread disinformation and spy of the people.
When will you be deployed to Iraq or Afganistan or Iran or the next Imperial crusade? After graduation? You definitely have the required homicidal instincts for the work.
I'm unsubscribing to this channel, i cannot bare to educate you any further in regards to foreign relations. Hopefully you now understand that your statement "There is no doubt that Bush would nuke any country" is in fact grosly incorrect. This was my intention. If you do not, you are blinded by the very scholars you seek to preceive global phenomena by; and as a result you have become increasingly closed minded towards anyone who would say otherwise. Your viewers need to acknowledge this.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
You will be missed.
Live and Be Well / Mike Hogan
radiohogan 3 years ago
hillary and obama are also war criminals.
the social norm for the US is now to go to war with people!!!
and people are responsible for paying high taxes to fund the war.
rosewood223 3 years ago
Imperial war has been America's policy for over a century, since the Spanish American war and the mass murder of people in the Philippines. The war in Viet Nam killed 4 million Southeast Asians.
I will soon do a video on presidential candidate John McCain's record as a war criminal. In 23 bombing missions over North Viet Nam he killed civilians intentionally as part of a policy to terrorize people with: anti personel pellets, napalm, bombs & rockets. Invasion &Killing civilians is a war crime.
radiohogan 3 years ago
he has destroyed not only the constitution, but economy, causing inflation and widening the income gap between social classes.
rosewood223 3 years ago
Correct!
radiohogan 3 years ago
enjoy your clips.
rosewood223 3 years ago
Hi Rosewood223:
Thank you.
All the Best / Mike Hogan
radiohogan 3 years ago
write this down in your Book. We will one day be attacked by China and Russia.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Will that be like when America was attacked by Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Panama, Iraq I, Afganistan & Iraq II? We attacked all 10 without rhyme or reason - 10 war crimes.
According to American Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the most serious war crime is to attack another country because all other war crimes stem from that war crime. Justice Jackson was a judge at the Nuremburg war crime trials.
Why would R or C attack the USA? R & C own America.
radiohogan 3 years ago
Russia wishes they owned us, China has us by the balls economically and if China joined the world community and pulled off some war crimes BS and sanctioned America, our economy would collapse. You are crazy, you are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theories I bet you could write a book on it.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
China owns over $1 trillion dollars of US bonds. Russia owns $250 billion in US bonds.
You are projecting your conspiracy theories onto me. Psychiatrists claim 90% of all communication is projection.
I am going for a swim. Catch you later.
Live and Be Well
radiohogan 3 years ago
I grew up in a conservative home. You think that is what my problem might be?
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
No, I think you are a G-man, an agent provocateur, a disinformation specialist. How is the pay for propaganda work? The pension must be superb.
radiohogan 3 years ago
hold on, are you saying I could get a pension just for speaking my mind?! Where do I sign up to be a G-man?
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Yep, that's what I am saying. There is no doubt the government will want you to work for them. However, in the 1960's the FBI would not take immigrants or first generation Americans. I am sure this has changed, but you may wish to check.
radiohogan 3 years ago
I am no immigrant.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Oh, are you a bona fide indigenous Indian? The rest of us are immigrants. When the English immigrated the Indians should have asked to see their papers (immigration or tourist visas).
radiohogan 3 years ago
im not an immigrant, and the last I saw we own the country not the Indians, they lost that war.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
When you say "we" own the country, who is the "we" you refer to. Genocide is not considered a war. Our American predecessors mass murdered the Indians.
The Indians just won almost $1 billion in a court decision this week. The were seeking $47 billion and will appeal to the Supreme Court. The many American governments did not respect a single one of the hundreds of treaties it signed with the Indian. So much for the Anglo American sense of authenticity.
radiohogan 3 years ago
you commie liberals would hope bush would be brought up on war trial?! Go back to Russia.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Yes, I definitely want to see Bush at a War Crimes Tribunal accused of a whole host of war crimes. The trial could be held at Nuremburg.
Are all Liberals commies? By the way, the commies no longer run Russia. It's been 17 years since the commies ran Russia.
G-men need to get a new history book.
radiohogan 3 years ago
And Vladamir Putin is a Democrat.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Hasn't Bush told us many times Vladamir is just like him, a good ole boy. Yes, both Bush & Putin are fascists - two peas in a pod, two sides of the same coin. They both steal elections. See my YouTube video on "How Bush Stole Two Elections."
radiohogan 3 years ago
Bush tell Putin that to sound diplomatic, I liked the way bush slapped Putin in the face by telling him to get out of georgia.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Oh, I thought Vldamir slapped Bush in the face when he had his tanks run all over Bush's favorite ally. Bush encouraged the Georgians to invade South Osetia. The Georgians believed Bush would have the American Air Force defend Georgia with precision bombing of Russian troops & tanks.
Of course, the American Power Elite understand the new Russian military doctrine. If American precision bombing is used, they will use tactical nukes that they have on missles with their attacking force.
radiohogan 3 years ago
Bush would nuke Russia before Russia even contemplated it, unfortunately our next pansy president will not do anything and we will be attacked and crippled, watch and see, its not all conspiracy, there are countries who would love to reduce our super power status under the right circumstances. by the way After Iraq our military efforts will be on Venezuela, watch and see.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
There is no doubt Bush would nuke any country. He has already considered using nukes on Iraq. Are you calling Senator John McCain a pansey? No conutry need reduce America. Bush has done the job for those countries. B-boy has destroyed the US Army and the US Constitution. What remains?
I am betting B-boy attacks Iran before he leaves office. No troops will be used because there isn't much of the American army left - much like after our defeat in Viet Nam.
Venezuela would win.
radiohogan 3 years ago
The Bush administration would not nuke just any country. You are -grosly- oversimplifying US foreign policy.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
We disagree.
radiohogan 3 years ago
Have you heard about a concept called deterrence?
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Have you heard about Imperialism & Empire?
radiohogan 3 years ago
Indeed, but that has nothing to do with deterrence, at all. The proliferation of nukes to these 'empires' creates a situation that results in their nonuse, due to MAD. Please provide an example of how nuclear deterrence has not worked. You cannot. Resulting in your statement about america nuking "any country" incorrect in the highest degree.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
America nuked Japan twice and threatened to nuke China and others. Bush is a stupid maniac who would nuke any country he could not bully with words.
In any case, we have moved from the topic of Bush's torturing and lying. Why do you have a problem with someone being in disagreement with you? You are typically American.
radiohogan 3 years ago
Those are not examples of a failed deterrence, and MacArthur was dismissed by Truman as a result of his ill concieved advice on china, which arose cuz china was sending 'volunteer' troops into Nkorea during the war in 53-54. I feel the need to correct your mistakes, so that you take more care when attempting to state foreign policy objectives of regimes. You're statement of Bush 'nuking any country' would provok mockery among the politically scienctic community, i wish to spare you from this.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Part I
I am unable to understand your point. You appear to be in favor of American Empire: militarism, colonialism & imperialism. You support the American Empire's use of nuclear weapons to bully others and remain the only superpower.
I do not support Empire, militarism, colonialism & imperialism. Just as the quest of Empire destroyed the Roman Republic, the American Empire builders have destroyed the American republic, ideals & values.
Iraq & Iran, and threaten China & Russ
radiohogan 3 years ago
Part III
You write America resisted attacking China with nukes in the 1950's. In fact, President Eisenhower threatened China with nuclear bombing in the mid 1950's over Taiwan.
Please don't worry about what academic hacks think of me. I have the ego strength to not care about what others think. I pursue truth without regard to hacks. I read and rely on the best scholars.
radiohogan 3 years ago
At the time, Tawain was the UN's legitimate seat of China's gov't. The taiwan strait was where the line of containment had been drawn for the PRC. The strategy of containment is firm, cautious and attentive to threats and relative power. it rests on kennan's logic that the internal changes needed to makes china less of a threat and more democratic are more likely to occur if the country's external ambitions are contained and the system is thus forced to fall on its own contradictions.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
This threat was supposed to be viewed as very credible, as to deter china. Would US have actually bombed them? i don't think so, cuz china and russia has sino-soviet treaty, which would have sparked a world war3, since it binded them to come to eatchother's aid if attacked by an outside power. Nevertheless, it worked, allowing for a 'cold peace' to take place between china and taiwan. I wouldn't have wanted it any other way to be honest. ^_~b
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Events in the Taiwan strait unfolded because China has better leadership then America. Cho En Lai may have been the finest political strategist the world has known. As a Chinese he took the long view. He knew, in time Taiwan would revert to Chinese control.
When asked by Henry Kissinger what he thought about the French revolution, Cho En Lai said: "It's to early to tell."
radiohogan 3 years ago
You have justified American Imperial policy by parroting the policy. You are an apologist for the Power Elite.
America was protecting it's corrupt petty tyrant - Chang Kai Chek. In fact, China has never had any external ambitions in it's 5000 year history according to Harvard Professor John K. Fairbank testifying before the American Senate's Foreign Relations Committee in February 1966. Kennan was wrong about China's external ambitions (the Domino Theory).
Taiwan has always been part of China.
radiohogan 3 years ago
I am simply in favour of using the Rational Actor Model to link the purpose and action of a given administration. Using this scientific process, i am able to fully explain the actions in terms of the goals. the history of contemporary foreign policy is simply the best strategy option in terms of military objectives at the given time. I am voting for the Green Party, I am Canadain, and I study these issues at university. I am what your 'typical american' should wish to aspire to!
hardsofty123 3 years ago
You are propagandized, much like the typical American. Professor Noam Chomsky explains the American (i.e. Canadian) propaganda model. As an aspiring academic, you must inculcate the values of the terror states (USA & Canada).
You have historical amnesia.
radiohogan 3 years ago
stop being so childish. I have successfully demonstrated legitimate reasons for the points i have forwarded. you on the other hand keep adding new dimensions to the debate. I can just as easily accuse you of being a 'propaganda machine' in the ultra liberal communist sense. But i don't, i'm beyond name calling and ad homeinens. Canada a terror state? Please.
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Your arrogance is only exceeded by your haughtiness. You must be from money.
Canada is in Afghanistan terrorizing the natives. Canadians are throwing away Canadian lives to genuflect to American Imperial power - a flunky state & people.
As an Irishman with an Irish passport, I consider all Anglo Saxons terrorists. This would include those of other nationalities who live under the dominance of Anglo Saxons (i.e. Anglophiles).
radiohogan 3 years ago
Part II
We have no enemies. Nukes are used to threaten weak countries like Iraq & Iran, while trying to intimidate China & Russia. Rather then deter war, the nukes are inducing war by giving the Ameriican Empire builders false courage to threaten others.
Neo Conservative Empire builders have used (1.) torture (2.) mass murder (3.) Cultural destruction. Chalmers Johnson makes these points in chapter 1 of his book "Nemesis."
radiohogan 3 years ago
I advise you to read "The IMagined Community" by Benedict Anderson. You keep talking about "we" as if every American citizen or everybody living in the US approves of what you say.
jonahbu 3 years ago
I talk about we as the ones who matter, lol.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
I doubt he tortures anyone? I still like bush, Id vote for him again, I hope his brother runs for president.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Why not read the books suggested?
radiohogan 3 years ago
The thing is, I really do not see anything wrong with torture short of ripping of limbs or committing torture acts reminiscence of the dark ages, you know using stuff like the Iron Maiden. I honestly believe torture is a necessary tactic to win any war, water boarding is perfect. The person feels like hes drowning but isn't. There isn't anything MORALLY wrong with that kind of torture. give me a break.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
you should watch "Watch Christopher Hitchens Get Waterboarded." since it's clear you won't read the books. i'm sure you have a few minutes to watch it, at least. you might change your mind. i'd also love to know where you came up with that priceless platitude that torture is necessary to win any war. where'd you get that one goebbels, goring, pinochet, the shah?
iluminatr462 3 years ago
its just a simple fact.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Get video! I don't like hitchens, lol Im still for it. Its not blunt force trauma you passive commie.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
you seem to be to dim to understand how torture affects the psyche. apparently in your little fantasy world psychological trauma is no big deal. unfortunately, in the real world psychological trauma can in many ways be much worse in the long run. i guess i must be passive since i don't delight in others' suffering. and i must be a commie because i don't understand how torture "wins" illegal occupations. woe is me. i guess i'll never be a good, freedom-loving, all-american neo-fascist.
iluminatr462 3 years ago
Dear iluminatr462:
See my reply to chris7777777777777.
All the Best / Mike Hogan
radiohogan 3 years ago
Rather then a "commie" analysis' yours is a comic book analysis. Cartoons are fine for kids and G-men, but not for those concerned about American values & war crimes.
You say you doubt Bush "tortures anyone." Then you advocate torture.
The French used waterboarding massively in Algeria & lost the most violent of all wars. War crime is not a winner. It makes devoted enemies.
American war criminals have, in fact, used "blunt force trauma" to kill war prisoners - an Iraqi air force general.
radiohogan 3 years ago
No, the french lost because they don't know how to win! You want to know why I don't care about torture? If I am captured you can guarantee I'll be beheaded. They are guaranteed 3 meals and some good "new fashion" waterboarding, I DONT CARE ABOUT THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ramification.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Are you a G-man?
radiohogan 3 years ago
whats a G-man?
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
: a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
lol, no, maybe one day, I am a full time student currently serving in the national guard.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
A G-man can be employed by any of the many hundreds of government bureaucracies designed to spread disinformation and spy of the people.
When will you be deployed to Iraq or Afganistan or Iran or the next Imperial crusade? After graduation? You definitely have the required homicidal instincts for the work.
Live and Be We//
radiohogan 3 years ago