I don't know how to feel about this.i see so much controversy on these videosin the comments,im 16 and became vegetarian when i was7,though still atefish so technically pesciarian(though i dont eat eggs or milk products).I dont think eating meat is a bad thing,but it makes me feel guilty to pay for the animals' bad treatment and murder by buyig the food, so i dont.But surely even fish lovers-like myself - can watch this video and still feel the disgust i do seeying them killed without reason?...
@piklweezl Glad to see there are still some rational and intelligent people out there. It's a sad world where Greenpeace can show some blood and get people to believe whatever they want. This smear campaign is going to threaten the entire tuna industry....
This is a terrible awareness campaign that has missed its mark, its not the FADs that are bad, its the method of fishing, purse seining is what needs to be banned, not the FADs....even without the FADs, tons of tuna can and will be caught with purse seining...this is a prime example of environmentalists not understanding fully of fishing practices, even if they succeed in banning FADs, they still will fail because purse seining will continue.
Fish Aggregating Devices do not imply capture, per se. Silly to overlook the added value of snorkelling and/or diving in/around such a manufact.
Refrain from kneejerk greenie pseudo intellectual objections.
Remember sustainability must also comply with financial aspects and that if you are living on Tonga or Kiribati or Maldives FADs can determine survival, well being and prosperity, sustainably.
We support and applaud the efforts Greenpeace and its subsidiary corporate sponsors including Starbucks, Nike, Microsoft, McDonalds Corp, BP and Goldman Sachs, because your profits represent our profits too!
The profits of the future are green... Go green, stay green, live Greenpeace.
wouldnt the most efficient fishing method be teh best for the environment because then they can use less fuel . its intersting that something so simple can attract fish so well
this is so inoying in australia if your a commercial fisherman your not alound with 300m of a fad their only aloud or recreational purposes only get it right mate
@piklweezi... what a response... choose to citicise a strategic solution and posit an extremely vague answer...' somewhere in the middle' is almost the same answer that bush gave about WOMD in Iraq...' its somewhere out there'... leave the solutions to the experts... and comments to yourself!
They need to ban netting, not FADS. The more artificial homes (reefs, fads, etc) fish get, the more they breed and the less pressure is placed on fishing in a particular area.
The problem with the world is over population, which causes excessive pollution and strains natural resources. Mass slaughtering of fish in one area affects many areas, because some of these fish are migratory.
Fish in their own territories, which may make them look after their local fish stocks & water quality.
@piklweezl Well said,,,and your carrot comment was hilarious tell him/her they have feelings and let him starve any body who would call them selfs packof twenty lol
@piklweezl There are no such things as 'sustainable fisheries', human beings aren't supposed to eat fish, or hadn't you noticed?
How many people do you know who swim into the ocean, from the shore, and then catch a fish with their bare hands, kill it by biting it, and then eat it uncooked? Are you seriously suggesting that this is natural?
Just because 'everybody does it', doesn't make it right. You are incapable of thinking for yourself, and certainly incapable of admitting you are wrong.
Why on earth does Japan get an exmption? Do they have some kind of greater right to make our species extinct than any other country? Our politicians and Japanese people ought to be pressuring the Japanese government heavily on this, as with the whaling
@pntrend we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
I do ALOT of traveling, and throughout the world i have seen a massive decline in ocean cleaniness and there are more and more jelly fish each year. Its really disgusting. I went vegetarian 4 years ago. Wouldnt eat anything out of the ocean if you paid me millions.
@mtmuller yes... we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
@chowlokhei Yes... We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or at least reduce eating fish from any source!
@goodcommentguy We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source! There are alternatives to get Omega 3 :-)
@bricktop11 We are just about to start an international capaign (4 Years for Fish) to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
its necessary to tell polititians to change marine laws and not to be areas without marine police. 100% of oceans should be under control. Harbours are the places where ships can be confiscated
@recuerof We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source! There are alternatives to get Omega 3 :-)
Money, greed, ignorance and lack of moderation are at the root of the problem. People want to eat meat and fish all the time and the seas can only feed so many before they begin to die. It seems like men will only think about conservation when they have no other option but to eat bugs. IDIOTS.
@susserina we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
i think if everyone was to email supermarket chains/international fisheries and demand them to stop unsustainable fishing, there would be a big impact
it's really incredible to fathom how much life this planet hosts... when you see such fishing practices on such a massive scale, it's weird that our oceans still contain anything...
We need to understand that the "economic efficency enfrocer" is the interest. The need to pay interest requires an ever increasing productivity whereby it doesn´t matter if the efficency gain is simply a result of a more sophisticated loot.
A mathmatical tool is on the top of the economic chain propelling an exponetial growth funtion into infinity yet neglegting the limited size of the ecosystem we live in.
You fight symptoms. The money system is the core issue to be dealt with.
this is very true. but even the monetary system was developped out of the simple "want for more" so technically money too is only a symptom. though personally i think it would be a very good thing to start with.
I don't understand why they can't apply this same technology to control the Asian Carp population in the Mississippi River Watershed? I mean the politics of some of you environmentalists hype shit like this up like the entire world ffish population is being depleted beyond all fucking recognition and don't even address the way some species adapt and thrive as "pests" beyond all fucking recognition. You don't see how the imbalance of nature avenge's herself?
@0PsycoDad0 Well said. Fractional reserve banking (i.e. counterfeiting money into existence and then charging interest on it) is the underlying cause of ALL the problems the world faces today - wars, overpopulation, the destruction of the rainforests, factory farming, slavery, mass immigration, exploitation of workers. ALL of these are ultimately caused by the demand for endless 'growth', which is quite obviously insane and impossible.
I don't know how to feel about this.i see so much controversy on these videosin the comments,im 16 and became vegetarian when i was7,though still atefish so technically pesciarian(though i dont eat eggs or milk products).I dont think eating meat is a bad thing,but it makes me feel guilty to pay for the animals' bad treatment and murder by buyig the food, so i dont.But surely even fish lovers-like myself - can watch this video and still feel the disgust i do seeying them killed without reason?...
theuniqueRKWvlog 2 days ago
fuck da fish
SHAVE UR CUNTS ASIAN WOMAN
mohammedislamrules 4 weeks ago
Whatever greenpeace!
tunashack 1 month ago
you shouldn't kill fish and chuck them back there fags
lolita150375 1 month ago
We use FADs for sportfishing a lot, and the income from these guided programs and sportfishing surpasses that of commercial fishing.
FADs aren't the problem, it's the practices that we allow combined with sheer over-consumption that are the problem.
plasterdbastard 1 month ago
@piklweezl Glad to see there are still some rational and intelligent people out there. It's a sad world where Greenpeace can show some blood and get people to believe whatever they want. This smear campaign is going to threaten the entire tuna industry....
AstairM5 2 months ago
This is a terrible awareness campaign that has missed its mark, its not the FADs that are bad, its the method of fishing, purse seining is what needs to be banned, not the FADs....even without the FADs, tons of tuna can and will be caught with purse seining...this is a prime example of environmentalists not understanding fully of fishing practices, even if they succeed in banning FADs, they still will fail because purse seining will continue.
zygopedelum 2 months ago 4
Fish Aggregating Devices do not imply capture, per se. Silly to overlook the added value of snorkelling and/or diving in/around such a manufact.
Refrain from kneejerk greenie pseudo intellectual objections.
Remember sustainability must also comply with financial aspects and that if you are living on Tonga or Kiribati or Maldives FADs can determine survival, well being and prosperity, sustainably.
lucusinfabula 2 months ago
@piklweezl
But FADs are an unsustainable fishing practice, that's why they are part of the problem, and coupled with unsustainable consumption, it's a bad mix
ernestgoesgolfin 3 months ago
We support and applaud the efforts Greenpeace and its subsidiary corporate sponsors including Starbucks, Nike, Microsoft, McDonalds Corp, BP and Goldman Sachs, because your profits represent our profits too!
The profits of the future are green... Go green, stay green, live Greenpeace.
CorporateRule 3 months ago
wouldnt the most efficient fishing method be teh best for the environment because then they can use less fuel . its intersting that something so simple can attract fish so well
mylexusis 6 months ago
this is so inoying in australia if your a commercial fisherman your not alound with 300m of a fad their only aloud or recreational purposes only get it right mate
TotalGnarSesh 9 months ago
Not a YouTube Fad! D:
IRGEMINIMAN 9 months ago
dumb japs
mynameisbobilike2123 9 months ago
@piklweezi... what a response... choose to citicise a strategic solution and posit an extremely vague answer...' somewhere in the middle' is almost the same answer that bush gave about WOMD in Iraq...' its somewhere out there'... leave the solutions to the experts... and comments to yourself!
duncanwill300 10 months ago
They need to ban netting, not FADS. The more artificial homes (reefs, fads, etc) fish get, the more they breed and the less pressure is placed on fishing in a particular area.
The problem with the world is over population, which causes excessive pollution and strains natural resources. Mass slaughtering of fish in one area affects many areas, because some of these fish are migratory.
Fish in their own territories, which may make them look after their local fish stocks & water quality.
6102wa 10 months ago
Nice tuna and rainbow runner. Makes me want to go fishing }=(()))o>
zeem8z 10 months ago
@piklweezl Well said,,,and your carrot comment was hilarious tell him/her they have feelings and let him starve any body who would call them selfs packof twenty lol
zeon008 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is it wrong to kill innocent creatures who have done nothing wrong to you?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
packoftwenty 10 months ago
@piklweezl There are no such things as 'sustainable fisheries', human beings aren't supposed to eat fish, or hadn't you noticed?
How many people do you know who swim into the ocean, from the shore, and then catch a fish with their bare hands, kill it by biting it, and then eat it uncooked? Are you seriously suggesting that this is natural?
Just because 'everybody does it', doesn't make it right. You are incapable of thinking for yourself, and certainly incapable of admitting you are wrong.
packoftwenty 10 months ago
Nice! Thats alot of fish. And a clever idea.
Honeebuket 1 year ago
Why on earth does Japan get an exmption? Do they have some kind of greater right to make our species extinct than any other country? Our politicians and Japanese people ought to be pressuring the Japanese government heavily on this, as with the whaling
pntrend 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pntrend we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
I do ALOT of traveling, and throughout the world i have seen a massive decline in ocean cleaniness and there are more and more jelly fish each year. Its really disgusting. I went vegetarian 4 years ago. Wouldnt eat anything out of the ocean if you paid me millions.
mtmuller 2 years ago
@mtmuller yes... we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
we can consume fish from fish ponds instead of those from the ocean
chowlokhei 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chowlokhei Yes... We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or at least reduce eating fish from any source!
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
they should put a halt on fishing for 3 years, yes we wont have any fish in the shops but atleast it gives time for the seas to fill up again.
bricktop11 2 years ago
There would however be some effects...deficiency of vitamins, oils, ect...so unless people can find an alternative, it's not an option.
goodcommentguy 2 years ago
@goodcommentguy We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source! There are alternatives to get Omega 3 :-)
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bricktop11 We are just about to start an international capaign (4 Years for Fish) to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
IF IT'S A FAD WON'T IT DIE OUT SOON?
dionreed441 2 years ago
hopefully the term "FAD" can be related in that way!
fizzley19 2 years ago
its necessary to tell polititians to change marine laws and not to be areas without marine police. 100% of oceans should be under control. Harbours are the places where ships can be confiscated
recuerof 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@recuerof We are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source! There are alternatives to get Omega 3 :-)
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
Money, greed, ignorance and lack of moderation are at the root of the problem. People want to eat meat and fish all the time and the seas can only feed so many before they begin to die. It seems like men will only think about conservation when they have no other option but to eat bugs. IDIOTS.
susserina 2 years ago
@susserina we are just about to start an international capaign to protect fish and all martitime species. Our point of entry in change is the consumer... Stopp or reduce eating fish from any source!
ChangeNavigators 1 year ago
excuse my language but this is really fucking messed up
AllForAnimals26 2 years ago
i think if everyone was to email supermarket chains/international fisheries and demand them to stop unsustainable fishing, there would be a big impact
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
or they would simply sew us for spamming there corporate greed emporioum
fenix611 2 years ago
It would be nice to display these devices to promote sea life where it is in desappearing.
hiphipvargas 2 years ago
150g thuna = 40 cent in the shops
its cheaper than everything else
i stopped 2 jears ago with my favourite pizza thuna and tell everyone that we should boykott thuna fish. No one follows.
aerobique 2 years ago
i follow
fenix611 2 years ago
may be instead of boycotting it, you should give them an alternative: watch?v=HP6rYThJWUg
kurthurtig 2 years ago
it's really incredible to fathom how much life this planet hosts... when you see such fishing practices on such a massive scale, it's weird that our oceans still contain anything...
blueorangelettuce 2 years ago
sadly, i am in the mood for crab D:
NaiNosnibor 2 years ago
money money money
veterraga 2 years ago
We need to understand that the "economic efficency enfrocer" is the interest. The need to pay interest requires an ever increasing productivity whereby it doesn´t matter if the efficency gain is simply a result of a more sophisticated loot.
A mathmatical tool is on the top of the economic chain propelling an exponetial growth funtion into infinity yet neglegting the limited size of the ecosystem we live in.
You fight symptoms. The money system is the core issue to be dealt with.
0PsycoDad0 2 years ago 10
this is very true. but even the monetary system was developped out of the simple "want for more" so technically money too is only a symptom. though personally i think it would be a very good thing to start with.
SchwarzesPCSchaf 2 years ago
I don't understand why they can't apply this same technology to control the Asian Carp population in the Mississippi River Watershed? I mean the politics of some of you environmentalists hype shit like this up like the entire world ffish population is being depleted beyond all fucking recognition and don't even address the way some species adapt and thrive as "pests" beyond all fucking recognition. You don't see how the imbalance of nature avenge's herself?
madmanmantra 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 Well said. Fractional reserve banking (i.e. counterfeiting money into existence and then charging interest on it) is the underlying cause of ALL the problems the world faces today - wars, overpopulation, the destruction of the rainforests, factory farming, slavery, mass immigration, exploitation of workers. ALL of these are ultimately caused by the demand for endless 'growth', which is quite obviously insane and impossible.
packoftwenty 10 months ago
keep up the goodwork
hollsnd82 2 years ago