Check out my Videos "Religion is ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians I CHALLENGE you to watch with an open mind. Atheists watch and if you like the videos then give thumbs up!!! Help spread the truth!!
I now know how to ride a unicycle Matt. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I think I shall let RichardDawkinsdotnet know of this video, I have no doubt Richard will find this amusing, quite.
@subgay trust me ^^ i can garuantee he seen it! have u seen the clip when he sits by his computer and merrily reads his hate mail ^^ Dawkins seems to be a cool dude! i bet u he would share a bong hit or two with u :)
@foppa16 I am very much aware of the kind of person Mr Dawkins is. I am a huge admirer of his, however, being a normal, if somewhat jovial, fellow doesn't mean he has seen every YouTube video posted about him.
@foppa16 To assume that people have, already linked it, is worse than assuming he has already seen it. Assuming he has seen it suggests egocentrism or narcissistic personality disorder, to assume you don't need to do something because you think others will already have shows, not assumes, laziness at it's most extreme.
@subgay Im making the speculation due to the odds that 1 more ppl in this world have had the same idea like you. so no, it has nothing to do with any personality dissorder :S its just commen sense :S i see that there is no need to continue this discussion! ohh man trolls are everywhere these days :(
@foppa16 I think you have a problem with reading. I never said assuming someone else had already sent someone else a link suggested a personality disorder. I said it shows laziness. If everyone that watched this video made the same assumption as you suggest, then NO-ONE would send the link. You want to talk about trolls you fucking retard, YOU REPLIED TO MY COMMENT. So, if you're that fucking stupid that you can't read a reply correctly, or remember who made the first comment, fuck off idiot.
After a long day of debating creationists and listening to their pure, unadulterated idiocy; after all of the personal insults and attempts to argue with die-hard indoctrination, I like to crack open a cold beer (or a glass of red wine, at the moment) and watch this video. It helps me cool the fuck off.
Well, I don't know about Richard Dawkins but there was a chap who was convicted of sexually molesting a dolphin when I lived in the north east of England.
His wife left him over it.
When interviewed, he said he didn't care that she had gone because "there's plenty more fish in the sea".
"I get to run around in my Ray Comfort underoos, Plus I'm so Fucking smart!" "You can't listen to Faith Hill's old records. You have to listen to her NEW albums!" Fucking hillarious!
Is this a Crank Call or something.. i mean he cant be serious about Toast in the shape of jesus.. if so.. Lock him up and make him sterile the earth is already in enough danger of becoming Dumber by the minute already
@Kazzeroth Kind of ironic, as I think you'll find that the Dawkins voice was dubbed in afterwards and the name "Richard Dawkins" has been shopped into the bottom of the screen. Matt is having an entirely different conversation to the one in the video.
@TychoCelchu Whilst I won't pretend that this video didn't fool me (although I am tired :P), though I wasn't only refering this video alone, they've hade several REAL prank callers who Matt went serious mode on.
How do you know there is no God? All these shows, radio broadcast, and book and lectures, debates, etc does not prove there is no God, does it? So actually, don't atheist hold their position by faith? Of course they do.
"No evidence" doesn't prove the non existence of God either. Unless one has seen all the evidence in the world, which is impossible, you can't say there is no evidence.
The atheist holds his position based on nothing but faith. The probability of no God is slim.
@miket1m There's "no evidence" that god is really a jelly donut that likes being pissed on but it's possible if we're throwing out the "no evidence" argument. Without evidence it's possible that you and I are sleeping together and enjoy earthquakes. At what point do we include evidence in how we see reality?
Where do you derive the probability of god? What is god?
"There is no evidence" This is an illogical statement, since you could not possibly know all the evidence in the world. If you did you would be God. There is an abundance of proofs. I believe there is a God because I have researched this and have found evidence.
@miket1m Instead of making multiple private messages, how about you spill out your "proofs" here, so that all of the nice atheists can have a shot at your claims?
Ok, take your pick. We can start with the Artiest's inabilty to account for the Laws of Logic, Rationality, Objective Morals, The Cosmological Argument, prophecies about Jesus in the Bible, Presuppositional, The Teleological Argument, Sickness as an argument against God's existence, The inability for atheist to show validy for atheism, etc, These are a few. Take your pick
@miket1m First, a basic definition of theism and atheism so we know what we're talkin about. Theism: someone who believes in a deity. Atheism: someone who isn't a theist (so, someone who doesn't have that belief that a god exists). Atheism does not mean the person in question believes there is no god, just that they don't believe one necessarily exists.
So, validity for atheism: there is no reason to think any religious claims are true. Anyone claiming contrary to that should seek a Noble prize
@miket1m As for proving any of the Abrahamic religions demonstrably false, some atheists like to get into that but it's completely unnecessary.
The argument for theism stops quit quickly: there is no reason to think any religion is true, and anyone who thinks they might have some proof should bring it up to be critically analyzed like everything else humans assert. You're either wrong and someone will show you why, or you're right and the whole world will become one religion.
@Truthiness231 There's no point trying to discuss it with Mike. All he's done is list the favourite arguments of William Lane Craig. Arguments that have been debunked many times.
He would appear to be a classic case of wilful ignorance, which equals a waste of your time trying to debate him.
@TychoCelchu Put me down as an intellectual masochist, I get off on trying to break through that wall of ignorance of "I'm always going to believe claim X without reason and despite evidence given that doing so is stupid".
When I was growing up, my family was 100% theistic. Through college I studied theology quite heavily, and came across the arguments for the first time for secularism (as did my family). Less than a decade later, my extended family of 50+ people is less than half religious ^.^
@miket1m Not being able to prove that god does not exist does not prove that he does. Man, dont you get that? Burden of proof is on you; your claim, your burden.
@miket1m If we can't know all of the evidence in the universe then how does your evidence and research hold up.
Is god all knowing past present and future? If so then he already knew that some of the creatures he created would be doomed to hell. Why do such a thing unless you enjoy watching your creation suffer. Free will does not apply here because god "already knew" how it would turn out.
@BrainInSkull You missed the point. I know God exists because I have sufficient evidence. I am speaking for me. You, on the other hand, reject any evidence shown to you because of your presuppositions. You have no evidence whatsoever, you don't know if God exist or not which makes your claim to atheism illogical.
Why, doesn't free will apply? You have it, don't you? You have a choice. Irrational statement.
@miket1m Again, imagine if you create something and you "ALREADY KNOW" the outcome of its fate. It may feel that it has free will but you, being all knowing "ALREADY KNOW" that it won't be saved. So, you've created something that you know will be doomed. Sadistic parenting.
@miket1m Let me guess, out of the thousands of Gods, the God you found happens to be the same as that of most people in your society? It's always a striking coincidence.
@miket1m I don't believe there is no god (I, like every other sane person not lying to themselves, don't actually know if one exists or not), I just don't believe there is a god. That's an atheist.
Theists have a belief that deity X exists. I don't believe deity X (or Y, or Z, for that matter) exists, which make me not a theist (an atheist). I don't make any claims as to whether a god does or doesn't exist, as I simply don't know, and until some good evidence is given for such a claim I won't.
@miket1m Granted, some atheists will claim there is no god, but generally they mean that the Abrahamic religions are clearly flawed and debunked (which is true, despite many people who foam at the mouth when told this). To be fair, these atheists are just messengers for reality; it's not their fault if some will take the credibility of an old book they've been drilled since early childhood is demonstrable true despite any inconsistency with reality, doubly so if they're violent about it...
@Truthiness231 No, the majority speak of the God of the Bible, specifically. If you dismiss the Bible then you would have to dismiss the writings of Aristotle, Plato, etc. The Bible is light years ahead of those ancient writings in regard to preservation.
There are other proof that are offered. Actually over 300 proofs. PM if you are interested in hearing one.
@miket1m I want you to disprove for me that Poseidon doesn't exist. What any rational atheist will say is that "There is little to no evidence for it, and there is massive quantities of evidence against it. It is almost CERTAINLY wrong."
How do you know there are no unicorns? These unbelievers do not prove there are no unicorns, do they? So actually, don't aunicornists hold their position by faith? Of course they do.
"No evidence" doesn't prove the non existence of unicorns either. Unless one has seen all the evidence in the world, which is impossible, you can't say there is no evidence.
The aunicornist holds his position based on nothing but faith. The probability of no unicorns is slim.
Finally an atheist video that's just about being funny. At first I thought it was stupid, but then the imitation was so good, I kept listening. THEN I found out it was Dclugi. Well. Of course, it's funny.
I'm pretty sure that the caller is Father Greg from 1GOD1Jesus over in Brisbane. He's an Atheist and loves to mock religion. His anti-Christian videos starring Father Greg are brilliant and vulgar. The voice and style are dead-on.
@bestvalue What, exactly, do you have faith in, in other words, what claims do you make based on faith and what evidence, exactly, do you base your faith upon and why, if there is evidence at all, would you need to have faith in the first place?
@AgeOfScience I actually don't use the word faith. But because science does not PROVE anything absolutely, everything we know is technically believed on faith. Don't make the mistake of confusing faith with BLIND faith. Blind faith is foolish. Faith is essential. Science and faith are inseparable. Faith means trust or confidence. But it always has evidence or it is blind.
@bestvalue Ok, there are several problems with your argument. Im going to break them down and tackle them one at a time.
First, you don't use the word 'faith'? Then why bother to define it? Furthermore, you clearly do use the word 'faith' as you've gone on to explain that faith is essential. By claiming that faith is essential, you are using the word 'faith'.
Second, your distinction between blind faith and faith is erroneous. Faith, in the context of theistic claims, is belief without...
@AgeOfScience .. or in spite of evidence, i.e. faith is blind, period. Knowledge, the subset of belief that is considered justified true belief is justified by evidence and logic, not by faith as you claim.
Third, absolute certainty is a red herring. If you want to use lack of absolute certainty as a basis for your argument then I implore you to follow the idea through to is logical conclusion; solipsism. This will of course undermine your entire argument. ...
@AgeOfScience ...Fourth, science does not depend on absolute certainty, nor does it imply the use of faith. Science deals with the application of logic to evidence and results in knowledge. That is to say that when science gives un an explanation it must be demonstrably supported by evidence and logic and it will only be held tentatively until and if some new explanation that is also demonstrably supported by the evidence and logic...
@AgeOfScience ... carries more explanatory power and predictive capabilities, and so on and so forth. Faith can never overturn a scientific theory for the simple fact that faith is not evidential or logical.
Fifth, you have completely avoided answering my question.
@AgeOfScience Well, I don't know who you were talking to, as the comment was addressed to yourself. What was the question this supposed pserosn avoided answering? Maybe I could mediate.
@Hanahleia If you read carefully on the All Comments page you will see that I posted 4 comments in succession, each with '...'s where applicable, the first of which was a rely to username bestvalue. All subsequent comments were then posted as replies to myself because it is an effective way of stringing groups of posts together when they all form a single response. It is actually a common practice among people who debate on YT, in the comment sections. Go a head and mediate if you want.
@AgeOfScience Oh, I went up and read them again. If you mean why did I define faith, I've answered it now. Can't promised how soon I'll be back unless I can correct this e-mail problem.
4:46 the part with the pen was the best! "But it's fallen out of the frame line" lol
RavidBunny 8 hours ago
Richard Dawkins my arse!!!!
crazymanlargemarge 9 hours ago
lol
whitelighter27club 12 hours ago
This was PERFECT!
ch09h 1 day ago
Comment removed
RavidBunny 1 day ago
Perfect haha
jackieboy5566 1 day ago
Dudes voice is Perfect.
HxCDeathMetalHead 2 days ago
LMAO.
chinopisces 2 days ago
funny as shit
TheOnemandigitaljam 3 days ago
Rofl, awesome video.
blaatdaap 3 days ago
Seriously, I'm kinda dissapointed that he didn't get the joke...
Orbitusx 3 days ago
Well done. This is a very clever video.
shimwah 4 days ago
this is DClugi doing the voice, and you stole this video from him
/watch?v=R_Lp4V8i2uM
thumbs up so nobody subs to the video thief ;p
super6plx 6 days ago 2
@super6plx Funny that the "thief" has a better quality video.
Zero9656 5 days ago
@Zero9656 well it appears that this is DCLugi's new channel, had to actually look around to confirm but I'm still not even 100% sure
if it IS dave's new account, how was I meant to know when he doesn't mention it anywhere whatsoever
super6plx 5 days ago
Dammit, was really hoping he actually did call, what a waste
green834721 6 days ago
Lol, that wasn't a real Christian. It was probably just an atheist troll
natmil1 6 days ago
Funny ^^ But wow ?! they let him on the air?
Schoening91 6 days ago
I found this hilarious. Im not religious in any specific way.
StardustSpaceMonkey 1 week ago
Off the wall funny. Good job.
Centerman2k 1 week ago
This was actually quite well done, even if the impersonation sounds more like Boris Karloff than Richard Dawkins.
TheSadieCam 1 week ago 9
@TheSadieCam i would cut my legs and tits of when I think of boris karlof and kinksy in the dark of the moon.
ashtongrist 6 days ago
XD!
aslacuentayya 1 week ago
We can ride a UNICYCLE?!?!? He's bought me. Christianity must be real
YourDarkAccomplice 1 week ago
this is funny. congrats.
CJmiles0307 2 weeks ago
a very crappy impersonation actually
anzorro 2 weeks ago
@anzorro yay:)
BrainInSkull 2 weeks ago
@anzorro I thought it was funny, certainly not the worst
ThePowerV3 1 week ago
Very nice impersonation
dragonfiremalus 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
dragonfiremalus 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my Videos "Religion is ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians I CHALLENGE you to watch with an open mind. Atheists watch and if you like the videos then give thumbs up!!! Help spread the truth!!
gasmask4poop 2 weeks ago
Oh man, I had forgotten about dclugi...time to see what he's been up to these past couple years...
quintopia 3 weeks ago
I now know how to ride a unicycle Matt. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I think I shall let RichardDawkinsdotnet know of this video, I have no doubt Richard will find this amusing, quite.
subgay 3 weeks ago
@subgay trust me ^^ i can garuantee he seen it! have u seen the clip when he sits by his computer and merrily reads his hate mail ^^ Dawkins seems to be a cool dude! i bet u he would share a bong hit or two with u :)
foppa16 3 weeks ago
@foppa16 I am very much aware of the kind of person Mr Dawkins is. I am a huge admirer of his, however, being a normal, if somewhat jovial, fellow doesn't mean he has seen every YouTube video posted about him.
subgay 3 weeks ago
@subgay well if he havent seen it personaly, i think already well over 1000 ppl has linked this clip to him
foppa16 2 weeks ago
@foppa16 To assume that people have, already linked it, is worse than assuming he has already seen it. Assuming he has seen it suggests egocentrism or narcissistic personality disorder, to assume you don't need to do something because you think others will already have shows, not assumes, laziness at it's most extreme.
subgay 2 weeks ago
@subgay Im making the speculation due to the odds that 1 more ppl in this world have had the same idea like you. so no, it has nothing to do with any personality dissorder :S its just commen sense :S i see that there is no need to continue this discussion! ohh man trolls are everywhere these days :(
foppa16 2 weeks ago
@foppa16 I think you have a problem with reading. I never said assuming someone else had already sent someone else a link suggested a personality disorder. I said it shows laziness. If everyone that watched this video made the same assumption as you suggest, then NO-ONE would send the link. You want to talk about trolls you fucking retard, YOU REPLIED TO MY COMMENT. So, if you're that fucking stupid that you can't read a reply correctly, or remember who made the first comment, fuck off idiot.
subgay 2 weeks ago
ahaha, its almost funny this whole fake, edited thing :D
sirkenned 3 weeks ago
But my soul is made of skittles.
Yes I know it's not original, but I loved that line.
Cyllid 3 weeks ago 15
2:07 - "But my soul is made of skittles"
Thenewfallingsacred 3 weeks ago
I think I just sh!t myself this was so hilarious!
Thenewfallingsacred 3 weeks ago
Somebody knows the number of the original episode? i want to hear the real caller.
Lautaro1234567 3 weeks ago
OMG that's a brilliant impersonation LMAO
Lautaro1234567 3 weeks ago
The caller does a good impression of Richard Dawkins. The only problem is that Richard's voice is a little less high pitched.
mymoset 4 weeks ago
@mymoset dude thats edited
sagar246246 3 weeks ago
A++++. Good troller. Would like to be trolled again.
(Thumbs up. Good job.)
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
*5 seconds in*
Ok, that's obviously not Richard Dawkins. Someone's trolling the shit out of AE.
*Matt takes caller seriously*
How does he not realize he's being trolled?
*notice font for caller name*
Oh, this was edited. God damn it, BrainInSkull.
*notice like bar*
Huh?
*watch to end*
Ok, that was amusing.
jaimesthesaint 4 weeks ago
After a long day of debating creationists and listening to their pure, unadulterated idiocy; after all of the personal insults and attempts to argue with die-hard indoctrination, I like to crack open a cold beer (or a glass of red wine, at the moment) and watch this video. It helps me cool the fuck off.
SeedsOfHatred 4 weeks ago
a very important question , its realy Richard Dawking or is a edited video ? , sorry for my english i'm chilean and i cant understand all the video
EvidLekan 4 weeks ago
@EvidLekan it is edited.
Talesone 4 weeks ago
Why both of these doesn't understand it's a prank ? I did in first 2 minutes
idare2talk 4 weeks ago
This made my day.
HELLCAT2012 4 weeks ago
This is hilarious, 'Richard' sounds extremely posh.
8Rincewind 4 weeks ago in playlist Watch Later 2
This is a joke apparently!
ThemTheyHeShe 1 month ago
dawkins is a troll!
AmaZiiNpk 1 month ago
OMG this voice overlay is so funny, a great win!
sooperfukker 1 month ago
Trolling hard, man! :)
docpify 1 month ago
YOU'RE MOTHER!
*hangs up*
misterwigggles 1 month ago
>And im so fucking smart!
Hahahahaha
jonasmaxdeath 1 month ago
How did these guys keep a straight face during this call?
jbealsmusic 1 month ago
Raping dolphins !
Well, I don't know about Richard Dawkins but there was a chap who was convicted of sexually molesting a dolphin when I lived in the north east of England.
His wife left him over it.
When interviewed, he said he didn't care that she had gone because "there's plenty more fish in the sea".
baldieman64 1 month ago
thats awsome
habadashery2009 1 month ago
you retards don't even realize this is edited.. wow
JohnF30Music 1 month ago 23
@JohnF30Music Yeah… They didn't even use the right font for "Richard Dawkins."
PolitcalIslam 1 month ago
@JohnF30Music lol you're not aware that people appreciate shit that's well done? So you call them "retards"? ... wow. sad.
YourDarkAccomplice 1 week ago
"Your Mother!" - Richard Dawkins
DollaramaShopper 1 month ago
Holy shit that was funny! Well done lad, well done indeed!
jeffhat 1 month ago
"I get to run around in my Ray Comfort underoos, Plus I'm so Fucking smart!" "You can't listen to Faith Hill's old records. You have to listen to her NEW albums!" Fucking hillarious!
suitnthaiguy 1 month ago
Is this a Crank Call or something.. i mean he cant be serious about Toast in the shape of jesus.. if so.. Lock him up and make him sterile the earth is already in enough danger of becoming Dumber by the minute already
dabois85 1 month ago
@dabois85 Richard Dawkins is and always has been a very famous proponent of atheism. It's a crank call.
Vaskadar 1 month ago
Comment removed
touchmyting 1 month ago
How did he get a soul of skittles? I'm stuck with the stupid souls of flight, and I've already made both sets of wings out of them.
Gameguy602 1 month ago
Mats fucking smart and cool and all but he really can't tell when somebody's taking the piss.
Kazzeroth 1 month ago
@Kazzeroth Kind of ironic, as I think you'll find that the Dawkins voice was dubbed in afterwards and the name "Richard Dawkins" has been shopped into the bottom of the screen. Matt is having an entirely different conversation to the one in the video.
TychoCelchu 1 month ago
@TychoCelchu Whilst I won't pretend that this video didn't fool me (although I am tired :P), though I wasn't only refering this video alone, they've hade several REAL prank callers who Matt went serious mode on.
Kazzeroth 1 month ago
@Kazzeroth I think they're all just joking around.
offwithurhead 1 month ago
How do you know there is no God? All these shows, radio broadcast, and book and lectures, debates, etc does not prove there is no God, does it? So actually, don't atheist hold their position by faith? Of course they do.
"No evidence" doesn't prove the non existence of God either. Unless one has seen all the evidence in the world, which is impossible, you can't say there is no evidence.
The atheist holds his position based on nothing but faith. The probability of no God is slim.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m There's "no evidence" that god is really a jelly donut that likes being pissed on but it's possible if we're throwing out the "no evidence" argument. Without evidence it's possible that you and I are sleeping together and enjoy earthquakes. At what point do we include evidence in how we see reality?
Where do you derive the probability of god? What is god?
BrainInSkull 1 month ago 9
@BrainInSkull Proof. Over 300 of them. You want to take the time to hear one? PM me
miket1m 1 month ago
@BrainInSkull
"There is no evidence" This is an illogical statement, since you could not possibly know all the evidence in the world. If you did you would be God. There is an abundance of proofs. I believe there is a God because I have researched this and have found evidence.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m Instead of making multiple private messages, how about you spill out your "proofs" here, so that all of the nice atheists can have a shot at your claims?
Arkyne88 1 month ago
@Arkyne88
Ok, take your pick. We can start with the Artiest's inabilty to account for the Laws of Logic, Rationality, Objective Morals, The Cosmological Argument, prophecies about Jesus in the Bible, Presuppositional, The Teleological Argument, Sickness as an argument against God's existence, The inability for atheist to show validy for atheism, etc, These are a few. Take your pick
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m First, a basic definition of theism and atheism so we know what we're talkin about. Theism: someone who believes in a deity. Atheism: someone who isn't a theist (so, someone who doesn't have that belief that a god exists). Atheism does not mean the person in question believes there is no god, just that they don't believe one necessarily exists.
So, validity for atheism: there is no reason to think any religious claims are true. Anyone claiming contrary to that should seek a Noble prize
Truthiness231 1 month ago
@Truthiness231
Atheism (A'thE-iz"um),-n, is defined as:
1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
2. disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.
The term atheism comes from the Greek word atheos, meaning godless. Atheos is derived form a, meaning "without," and theos, meaning "deity".
Atheism is to be distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not.
I know what an atheist is. I used to be one.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m As for proving any of the Abrahamic religions demonstrably false, some atheists like to get into that but it's completely unnecessary.
The argument for theism stops quit quickly: there is no reason to think any religion is true, and anyone who thinks they might have some proof should bring it up to be critically analyzed like everything else humans assert. You're either wrong and someone will show you why, or you're right and the whole world will become one religion.
Truthiness231 1 month ago
@Truthiness231 There's no point trying to discuss it with Mike. All he's done is list the favourite arguments of William Lane Craig. Arguments that have been debunked many times.
He would appear to be a classic case of wilful ignorance, which equals a waste of your time trying to debate him.
TychoCelchu 1 month ago
@TychoCelchu Put me down as an intellectual masochist, I get off on trying to break through that wall of ignorance of "I'm always going to believe claim X without reason and despite evidence given that doing so is stupid".
When I was growing up, my family was 100% theistic. Through college I studied theology quite heavily, and came across the arguments for the first time for secularism (as did my family). Less than a decade later, my extended family of 50+ people is less than half religious ^.^
Truthiness231 1 month ago
@Truthiness231 You can negate theism all day long. That still does not prove God does not exist, does it? Man, you just don't get it.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m Not being able to prove that god does not exist does not prove that he does. Man, dont you get that? Burden of proof is on you; your claim, your burden.
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@miket1m pastebin(.)c0m/7fRCeBQy
You should type that in, rather than copy and paste it. Don't forget it's case-sensitive.
I look forward to our discussion.
Arkyne88 1 month ago
@miket1m If we can't know all of the evidence in the universe then how does your evidence and research hold up.
Is god all knowing past present and future? If so then he already knew that some of the creatures he created would be doomed to hell. Why do such a thing unless you enjoy watching your creation suffer. Free will does not apply here because god "already knew" how it would turn out.
BrainInSkull 1 month ago
@BrainInSkull You missed the point. I know God exists because I have sufficient evidence. I am speaking for me. You, on the other hand, reject any evidence shown to you because of your presuppositions. You have no evidence whatsoever, you don't know if God exist or not which makes your claim to atheism illogical.
Why, doesn't free will apply? You have it, don't you? You have a choice. Irrational statement.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m Again, imagine if you create something and you "ALREADY KNOW" the outcome of its fate. It may feel that it has free will but you, being all knowing "ALREADY KNOW" that it won't be saved. So, you've created something that you know will be doomed. Sadistic parenting.
Does jesus love satan?
BrainInSkull 1 month ago
@miket1m Let me guess, out of the thousands of Gods, the God you found happens to be the same as that of most people in your society? It's always a striking coincidence.
OhReallyNoWai 1 month ago
@OhReallyNoWai Wow you guess right. On the first try to. You're good. I wouldn't say it was a coincident
miket1m 1 month ago
@BrainInSkull Grow up
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m I don't believe there is no god (I, like every other sane person not lying to themselves, don't actually know if one exists or not), I just don't believe there is a god. That's an atheist.
Theists have a belief that deity X exists. I don't believe deity X (or Y, or Z, for that matter) exists, which make me not a theist (an atheist). I don't make any claims as to whether a god does or doesn't exist, as I simply don't know, and until some good evidence is given for such a claim I won't.
Truthiness231 1 month ago
@Truthiness231
Why don't you believe there is no God?
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m Granted, some atheists will claim there is no god, but generally they mean that the Abrahamic religions are clearly flawed and debunked (which is true, despite many people who foam at the mouth when told this). To be fair, these atheists are just messengers for reality; it's not their fault if some will take the credibility of an old book they've been drilled since early childhood is demonstrable true despite any inconsistency with reality, doubly so if they're violent about it...
Truthiness231 1 month ago
@Truthiness231 No, the majority speak of the God of the Bible, specifically. If you dismiss the Bible then you would have to dismiss the writings of Aristotle, Plato, etc. The Bible is light years ahead of those ancient writings in regard to preservation.
There are other proof that are offered. Actually over 300 proofs. PM if you are interested in hearing one.
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m I want you to disprove for me that Poseidon doesn't exist. What any rational atheist will say is that "There is little to no evidence for it, and there is massive quantities of evidence against it. It is almost CERTAINLY wrong."
chilledkirby 1 month ago
@chilledkirby What massive quantity of evidence do you have that proves God doesn't exist? PM me and I will present you with proof.
miket1m 1 month ago
Comment removed
Illuminatenich 1 month ago
@miket1m @miket1m using this logic.. here are some things you believe in.
unicorns
bigfoot
the lochness monster
godzilla
aliens
and that monkeys shoot out of my asshole as i laugh at you..
lightspeedrhino 1 month ago 2
@lightspeedrhino Wow, thats good. How long did it take you to write that sphincter boy? You are amazingly clever. Hahaha
miket1m 1 month ago
@miket1m Turn the other cheeck. Sorry couldn't resist.
BrainInSkull 1 month ago
@miket1m You still haven't replied to me. I'm becoming impatient.
Are you planning to ignore me, idiot? That would be disappointing.
Arkyne88 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@miket1m
How do you know there are no unicorns? These unbelievers do not prove there are no unicorns, do they? So actually, don't aunicornists hold their position by faith? Of course they do.
"No evidence" doesn't prove the non existence of unicorns either. Unless one has seen all the evidence in the world, which is impossible, you can't say there is no evidence.
The aunicornist holds his position based on nothing but faith. The probability of no unicorns is slim.
NeroJoe83 1 month ago
@miket1m oh your so wrong , actualy reaserch your claims , and properly listen toy what athiests say befor you come out with such a benine comment
sentinelxr 1 month ago
I wonder if Richard Dawkins saw this. He'd prolly laugh his ass off.
Forlo12345 1 month ago 2
Very good :)
Wulfyn99 1 month ago
Omg i cant stop crying its so damn funny..
vincentXXX666 1 month ago
what just happened...
OlderSnake 1 month ago
"you think that a pedophile rapist" "with the dolphins yes!" lmfao
HavokMakerX 1 month ago
where they take all the dolphins and toast away
Bizzer10 1 month ago
good dawkins voice lol
meanderband 1 month ago
im in tears lol, thank you for this
lypse14 1 month ago
doesnt sound like dawkins at all :/
superhbman 1 month ago
@superhbman i think it's a pretty damn good impression :)
isaachaze1 1 month ago
"But my soul is made of skittles"
Awesome lol :P
TheDigitalStone 1 month ago 23
HAHAHAHAHA
StrandedMonkey 1 month ago
See even richard dawkins knows religion is true
KnightOnlinell 1 month ago
This is so funny.
Faithmaster 1 month ago
I love this video so much I watched it 4 times and I'm still laughing.
GreatCollapsingHrung 1 month ago
ROFL
99minerkc 1 month ago
"We all get to run around in our Ray Comfort underoos."
Hilarious. I tip my hat to you, sir!
ChipArgyle 1 month ago 2
i have to see this ep plz msg me the link if u have it xDDDDDDDDDDDD
johnyvines 1 month ago
i love that the guy to the right is taking the call so serious, it's epic!
haitiboyboy 1 month ago
Hahaha! That was the best laugh I've had in years! "I now know how to ride a unicycle, Matt!" XD
genobahamut1337 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Famous atheists last words before dying. on you tube !!!!!check it
kongo4527 1 month ago
Finally an atheist video that's just about being funny. At first I thought it was stupid, but then the imitation was so good, I kept listening. THEN I found out it was Dclugi. Well. Of course, it's funny.
StLennyBruce 1 month ago
your mother
lnagh31 1 month ago
Ha ha ha! We atheist need somemore laughs! The imitation is quite good
SanneBree 1 month ago
This vid made day LMAO!!
wanyudo 1 month ago
YO MOTHAH!
BreakTheSkyMyseIf 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure that the caller is Father Greg from 1GOD1Jesus over in Brisbane. He's an Atheist and loves to mock religion. His anti-Christian videos starring Father Greg are brilliant and vulgar. The voice and style are dead-on.
TheCrimsonification 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
Sounds like Mr Burns to me.
DrChalkwithering 1 month ago
hahahaha
MrBoomable 1 month ago
Lol wtf why are they acting so serious
kjuyhfklujhkuyf 1 month ago
@kjuyhfklujhkuyf Cus the video is edited. This call never happened. Although, it's still hilarious.
flensdude 1 month ago
@flensdude i started to think that after i commented haha, i feel stupid
kjuyhfklujhkuyf 1 month ago
Doesn't sound like Dawkins at all.
nicksynnz 1 month ago
@nicksynnz Nonsense. It's an excellent impersonation.
mikelheron20 1 month ago
Comment removed
kjuyhfklujhkuyf 1 month ago
is this a parody?
Akandos 1 month ago
Funny bs
Jeff84455 1 month ago
Truly fucking awesome.
brodi81 1 month ago
Hahaha, Americans are so bad at accents.
CymroGoch 1 month ago
@CymroGoch have you met my mom?! lol her parents were brits but she was raised here
TheNameIsLegion 1 month ago
@TheNameIsLegion Where the fuck is 'here'?
CymroGoch 1 month ago
"My soul is made of skittles." I almost lost it listening to this at work!
SilentMott 1 month ago
Trust and confidence based on evidence is the very definition of faith, Matty boy.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue You forgot to mention that "atheism is a religion" Herp de derp!
GodOfTheJuice 1 month ago
@GodOfTheJuice If atheism is a religion then not collecting stamps is a hobby. Herp de derp!
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue What, exactly, do you have faith in, in other words, what claims do you make based on faith and what evidence, exactly, do you base your faith upon and why, if there is evidence at all, would you need to have faith in the first place?
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience I actually don't use the word faith. But because science does not PROVE anything absolutely, everything we know is technically believed on faith. Don't make the mistake of confusing faith with BLIND faith. Blind faith is foolish. Faith is essential. Science and faith are inseparable. Faith means trust or confidence. But it always has evidence or it is blind.
bestvalue 1 month ago
Comment removed
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bestvalue Ok, there are several problems with your argument. Im going to break them down and tackle them one at a time.
First, you don't use the word 'faith'? Then why bother to define it? Furthermore, you clearly do use the word 'faith' as you've gone on to explain that faith is essential. By claiming that faith is essential, you are using the word 'faith'.
Second, your distinction between blind faith and faith is erroneous. Faith, in the context of theistic claims, is belief without...
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience .. or in spite of evidence, i.e. faith is blind, period. Knowledge, the subset of belief that is considered justified true belief is justified by evidence and logic, not by faith as you claim.
Third, absolute certainty is a red herring. If you want to use lack of absolute certainty as a basis for your argument then I implore you to follow the idea through to is logical conclusion; solipsism. This will of course undermine your entire argument. ...
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience ...Fourth, science does not depend on absolute certainty, nor does it imply the use of faith. Science deals with the application of logic to evidence and results in knowledge. That is to say that when science gives un an explanation it must be demonstrably supported by evidence and logic and it will only be held tentatively until and if some new explanation that is also demonstrably supported by the evidence and logic...
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience ... carries more explanatory power and predictive capabilities, and so on and so forth. Faith can never overturn a scientific theory for the simple fact that faith is not evidential or logical.
Fifth, you have completely avoided answering my question.
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience Are you talking to yourself?
Hanahleia 1 month ago
@Hanahleia No.
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience Well, I don't know who you were talking to, as the comment was addressed to yourself. What was the question this supposed pserosn avoided answering? Maybe I could mediate.
Hanahleia 1 month ago
@Hanahleia If you read carefully on the All Comments page you will see that I posted 4 comments in succession, each with '...'s where applicable, the first of which was a rely to username bestvalue. All subsequent comments were then posted as replies to myself because it is an effective way of stringing groups of posts together when they all form a single response. It is actually a common practice among people who debate on YT, in the comment sections. Go a head and mediate if you want.
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience "you have completely avoided answering my question"
What was your question? YouTube started sending my notices to a different e-mail address that I never check so I just saw these now.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue My question was what do you have faith in and what evidence do you have for why?
AgeOfScience 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience Oh, I went up and read them again. If you mean why did I define faith, I've answered it now. Can't promised how soon I'll be back unless I can correct this e-mail problem.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@AgeOfScience "science does not depend on absolute certainty"
My point exactly.
bestvalue 1 month ago