Inasmuch as there is still space to respond to this interesting topic, I’d like to clarify (not recant) my earlier response. I DO NOT THINK a "newspaper" is an appropriate venue to publish anyone’s salary – nonprofit, corporate, public or private. I think “disclosing” this information should be “mandatory” for ALL nonprofits BUT published in an organization’s annual report, industry publications, etc. so that persons with a legitimate and relevant interest might learn the facts.
Usually, I’d say only persons with a vested interest in the Non-profit (donors, recipients of the Mission) should have salary info. BUT there are no reliably vigilant Gatekeepers to prevent “Greed” from jeopardizing the integrity of the Mission. So I now say Let It All Hang Out! Those at the “high-end” of the compensation food chain should refuse a salary increase once in a while or tithe their bonuses back to the Mission. Also, rigorous inquiry should NOT be limited to Jewish organizations!
Inasmuch as there is still space to respond to this interesting topic, I’d like to clarify (not recant) my earlier response. I DO NOT THINK a "newspaper" is an appropriate venue to publish anyone’s salary – nonprofit, corporate, public or private. I think “disclosing” this information should be “mandatory” for ALL nonprofits BUT published in an organization’s annual report, industry publications, etc. so that persons with a legitimate and relevant interest might learn the facts.
Orbit1947 1 month ago
Usually, I’d say only persons with a vested interest in the Non-profit (donors, recipients of the Mission) should have salary info. BUT there are no reliably vigilant Gatekeepers to prevent “Greed” from jeopardizing the integrity of the Mission. So I now say Let It All Hang Out! Those at the “high-end” of the compensation food chain should refuse a salary increase once in a while or tithe their bonuses back to the Mission. Also, rigorous inquiry should NOT be limited to Jewish organizations!
Orbit1947 2 months ago