anyone knows that this is actually a carol??? (yes im posting it around Christmas )"sleepers awake". when the reeds come in, tats actually suppose to be the main choir with the main tune! not the flutes or pedal/bass (lol) but the reeds in the left hand!
good interpretation but for my taste bit fast, love the stops settings. anyone can help me find wat stops r they??? 8' flute and a nasard for the great i believe and an 8'reed anyone help plz??? want to know.
Das ist keineswegs zu schnell. Dem Choral liegt der Text "Zion hört die Wächter singen, das Herz tut mir vor Freuden springen. Sie wachet und steht eilend auf......" Da kann und darf es gar nicht langsamer sein, sonst würde nichts vor Freuden springen und eilend aufstehen. Bach hat da wieder wunderbar den Text vertont - wie immer!
@stevtomato Dann scheint mir, dass Herr Koopman kein absolutes Gehör hat, sonst würde er bei einer höher gestimmten Orgel Probleme beim spielen bekommen.
@KirchenChris Ja, es scheint die Orgel höher gestimmt zu sein. Ton Koopman spielt/dirigiert diesen Choral für meinen Geschmack auch immer viel zu schnell... xD
@vanburikwouter Yes the builder of Freiburg im Breisgau cathedral organ is actually Gottfried Silbermann (1683-1753). He was the brother and the pupil in organ building of Andreas Silbermann (1678-1734). These two brothers shared the business territories. Gottfried worked in Bade Würtemberg while Andreas worked in Alsace, the next door region which was part of France yet. Both of them are famous. Andreas learned french organ building in Paris (1704-1706) with François Thierry
zu schnell ZU Schnell ZUSCHNELL und die Triller - nein - I am sorry you are brilliant no doubt and no matter I cannot condone this kind of playing my works - Why - is the Church on fire and firebrigade nowherere to be seen - sorrry for my mediocre English - JSBach Hochachtungsvoll von Leipzig as you know
@vanburikwouter Well, while it *is* a transcription of Bach's setting of "Zion hört die Wächter singen" that is of course just the second verse of "Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme" so is isn't wrong to describe this as being "a transcription from the Cantate Wachet auf ruft uns die stimme (BWV 140)" because that is exactly what it is!
I prefer the "NON" mechanical Bach. This is just that. Great. Why oh why did he have to fuck everythin g up tho with his annoying mechanical crap he wrote as well.
@philateliceun According to you mate. A purist no doubt. I most definately am not. GFH never bothered himself with that mechnicval crap just to please the likes of you. he only composed music pleasing to the ear not the mind.
@Malloyism Your ear doesn't understand music, only your brain does. I can understand you don't like the style but to call it crap is just being a arrogant know it all.
@philateliceun Not true Sir. I said only his mechanical stuff. I like most of JSB music just not the fast repetative style. His harmonies and choral pieces are very pleasing to the ear. french Suite played on either piano.harpsichord or organ is my fave. cheeers
@philateliceun I like a lot of music lovers do not wish to understand music. We simply wish to enjoy what is pleasing to our ears mate. I cant understand you. Why is it almighty neccesary to have to understand music. Why cant i just enjoy some of it and dislike some of it. Your an idiot .
@Malloyism What? If you read a book do you just read the letters or do you try to understand the book? If you look at a painting do you just look at it and hope something comes at you or do you try to understand why the painter painted what he painted? Same with music, you can just sit there and let the waves hit your eardrum or you can try to understand why he chose those notes or why he chose that theme or instrument. And sir, I am certainly not an idiot, asshole would be correct though.
@Malloyism And ofcourse you can dislike stuff, I never said you can't. Its just that when you say stuff like mechanical crap you sound very ignorant . I myself don't like Mozart, I get bored listening to it but I will never call it monotone crap cause I know it isn't and I would be very ignorant in saying so. If you call the music of the greatest composer who ever walked this earth crap just because you don't like it it comes over as being a bit of an ignorant asshole.
@SuperBabel2 Ben ça alors. Et moi qui croyais que c'était le choral du Veilleur (ce qui correspond au titre) ! Ce serait donc celui des vierges folles ou des vierges sages. Autre nouvelle surprenante, on peut donc être sage et folle à moins que ce ne soit folle et sage ? Quelle panade..
@frenchiecocorico1 bonjour, cher ami...ne pas connaitre ce thème des vierges folles et des vierges sages dénote une inculture gigantesque, au lieu de moquer, mettez-vous donc au courant de ce thème tellement connu...! D.BABEL
@SuperBabel2 Vis à vis d'un organiste qui connait ce choral et son histoire depuis de nombreux lustres, votre remarque est idiote.
Mon observation était humoristique, mais votre commentaire démontre que vous n'avez aucune subtilité d'esprit ni aucun humour. Croyez vous être seul à detenir la culture ?
Ce choral doit être appelé le " choral du veilleur" car il correspond à l'air de ténor de la cantate BWV140 où le veilleur appelle les vierges à se réveiller ( Mathieu Chap 25 vers. 1 à 13)
@SuperBabel2 Je n'ai eu aucun effort à faire pour me "rattraper" alors que c'est vous qui vous êtes rétaler, c'est là toute la différence. Ne prenez pas votre cas pour une généralité qui ne me concerne pas ...dommage !
@frenchiecocorico1 Décidément, sans commentaire!!! (soignez tout de même la syntaxe, et surveillez vos fautes d’orthographe...) car à ce moment, le prétendu ridicule change de camp... D.BABEL
@SuperBabel2 Commencez par surveiller vous même votre orthographe et votre syntaxe avant de donner des conseils aux autres. Vous démontrez une fois encore que le ridicule s'acharne sur vous. Surtout soyez plus modeste et circonspect dans vos jugements.
Lovely! Suprising but very nice tempo! It's not too fast but joyful. This is a perfect example how you can create almost a new piece of the same piece with a new tempo. Well done!
Yes, its too fast! Im professional musician too... Music means for me to FEEL anything... not to show how nice and quick i can play an uneasy trio piece on the organ... I really apreciate the phrasing and detailed work in all three voices, but the tempo destroys the feeling for me.
slow and pronounced .... fast and clear .... the possibilities are even infinite ... and I must say: most of them are fantastic .... even this ... :-)
Being an organist myself, I DO find this to be a little too fast and static, but what a performance! His technique is divine! Would love to hear him play the famous F Major Toccata by Widor!
Es muy conmovedor la trama, las vicisitudes de la melodía en su dinámica, su tropismo ascendente. concuerdo con clashtitans2: impresionante rendimiento! lleno de vitalidad
@Mike1245690 Dear friend, I think so because Ton Koopman betrays the real Bach's taste and Bach's mind. We know how Bach wants we play the organ. J.N. Forkel, a great friend of his sons, tells us that he played the organ as a choir singing an hymn: spiritual, solemn, not fast, with a great liturgic taste. Koopman is a very good harpsichordist, but on he plays the organ without respect Bach's wishes. We have to listen Schweitzer, Germani, Vierne and Ruebsam, if we want to listen really Bach.
@DeusMisereremei I like Koopman's tempo but that's all. In my opinion Koopman made too many mordents and trills... If you wanna know who's my favourite organist my answer is direct - Martin Sander. Try to find his CD on the net, his recordings of Passacaglia c moll or Nun komm', der Heiden Heiland are amazing.
I agree, I think this piece should be played slightly faster. It's such a movingly beautiful melody--these kinds of pieces have the ability to really materialize the Lord in all of His glory. I think this particular organ has a wonderful sound, and I personally love the interpretation. I understand, perhaps Bach meant it to run slightly slower... but this performance certainly gives this piece justice. I could listen to this forever.
Koopman for me is undoubtedly the best interpreters of Baroque music (in this case of Bach). An ability to combine rigorous historicist inventiveness and novelty, particularly in ornamentation, phrasing and breath articulation. Moreover, for composers and musicians of the Baroque period, the improvisation was much more frequent than is practiced today in the interpretations.
And Bach is a genius, by far my favorite composer!
Koopman for me is undoubtedly the best interpreters of Baroque music (in this case of Bach). An ability to combine rigorous historicist inventiveness and novelty, particularly in ornamentation, phrasing and articulation of breath work. Moreover, for composers and musicians of the Baroque period, the improvisation was much more frequent than is practiced today in the interpretations.
And Bach is a genius, by far my favorite composer!
What a superb rendition. Tempo a bit surprising at first, but it reveals the joy of the piece, and will now inform my listening to other performances. Thank you Mr Koopman.
Merci Mr Koopman, on redécouvre à chacune de vos interprétations ce qui avait été oublié...la pulsation baroque parce qu'elle nécessite une technique parfaite et que beaucoup d'organistes ne maitrisent pas cette technique de l'instrument...alors ils diront que le tempo est trop rapide mais ce n'est en fait qu'une excuse pour la paresse de leurs mains de de leurs pieds ....peu arriveront à rendre à l'œuvre de Bach cette pulsation ....on disait aussi à Bach qu'il jouait trop vite !!!
@artois54 You are seriously wrong. The tempo is just good. and non-musician and hecan't feel bach's music??? You know less about yourself that koopman knows about bach.
Simply nice! Beautiful registration. Organ and church are both amazing. This choral is in E flat major, but organ are transposed +2 semi-tones, so it's in F major. I like his articulation too. All in all, it's perfect.
the better one compared to other interpretations, one wakes up by Koopman, and as an extra a beautifull registering.i like it but cant be awake moving in his tempo.
How can one possibly ask ''how come it would be so very boring if we all performed at the same tempo?!'' What a stupid question! Isn't it obvious?! Why do you think that there are so many different performers/conductors/artists who record the complete works of Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, etc. which have already been recorded thousands of times?! Answer. . . because it gives us DIFFERENT interpretations. This is why we all have our favorite performers and interpreters. Different people move us.
May I take a liberty add onto your comments about interpretation? The thing most people fail to realize about this is that the true Baroque style, "Stylus Phantasticus", is how they composed music, understood it and performed. It basically means no limits, total freedom. Bach's music is made to be played differently. A modern understanding of the music never works with Baroque music, "To play exactly as Bach did", a truly obsolete pretense. Bach would have played it differently every time.
You are exactly right, Sir. It seems that people do indeed fail to realize this. We know for a fact that teachers of the Baroque era taught their students (as they were taught) to perform the music freely. And as you mentioned, we also know that they DID NOT perform the works the same each time. Having said that, it is also known to us (from sources of that period; via various students, colleagues, and parishioners) that Bach himself was known to play quite briskly.
@musicaorganum, Bach shocked and offended those closed minded Lutheran congregations of his early years. The ones that preferred a simple and straightforward approach to their music in the church services. It's just nature, when ever are tree's exactly the same? During seasons they change, and over their life they grow. People think that period performance is like building a bridge back to the stone age, all those that think so have no idea how horribly wrong they are.
For any real musician, Bach's music is absolutely endless. Just like his mind was. Pardoning myself from period performance for a moment, I also like hearing Bach's music on the piano or a Cavaille-Coll organ, and for me at least it works beautifully. Because it is so intricately crafted, in a universal way. Karl Richter says in an interview on YT that if one isn't inspired with new ideas of how to play a piece, (that are inspired directly by the composer), you play it with a disdainful routine.
And the fact is that the best interpretations come through consummate, artistic knowledge of the music and of the composer. This isn't an aimless interpretation (like some people that I won't name), it's Baroque poetry incarnate through sound. The idea is creating new life, that life, and either way you look at it, this radiates endlessly from a master composer like Bach through his scores. The color is there for all of us to find, it's just that some have no awareness of it and prefer "safety".
Thank you for your comment! There were many times when I have heard this piece performed, I felt as if I were at a funeral rather than a joyous occasion or such. This is supposed to be a happy piece.
@advisorC101 Koopman also explains in a directors cut on this DVD (or perhaps another one I have) that he knows that some organist disagree with his tempo. His response is simply, "I don't really care, they can play it their way."
@Marzziooo, I'm not the one who thought of it though. There's a video somewhere on youtube where a wonderful young musician made that comment, I only now just remembered that. ^^;
@advisorC101 I love this comment. Anyone who questions koopman's interpretation of Bach's music I just shake my head and laugh. First off I would love to see people who question his interpretation of the piece to A) play the piece in the first place and B) play it with as much showmanship and character as Koopman does. Lets get some freakin educations people. The organ is tuned higher than the modern "standard" of 440. So yes it sounds like its in F major. We know people...
@Afaral1989, I disagree with you totally. Everyone has the right to question another's preferences for their playing a piece. It does not matter if they can or can not play it, that's just empty Ad Hominem.
@Afaral1989, Why are you directing that at me? I haven't even said anything against Koopman. I was only pointing out that your contention is an empty refutation. Read the comment properly before you reply.
@advisorC101 Stop using big words to make yourself look smart, it just makes you sound like a lonely virgin. Plus read my comment correctly first.... i was saying i liked your comment about it being sleepers awake not go back to sleep. the second half of my comment was directed at you though. it was two all the other people whining about how it sounds like it is in F major. Fucking eh people. Your not the only one in world with perfect pitch. Stop bitching...
@Afaral1989, If anyone here's bitching it's some empty guy like you who only gives a damn about fucking. Read my comments again you retard. It doesn't fucking matter what you were praising. I was only pointing out that you make a pointless statement about people who have a disagreeing opinion [ON THE PLAYING]. I actually agree about your comment on the pitch of the organ. Try growing a brain instead of an erection you fuckwit.
''Too fast,'' says who?! Did Bach himself say so? It might be a little more brisk than how others are used to hearing it, but it does not make this performance too fast. It is supposed to be happy piece. I too, play it at around this tempo. Many times have I heard this piece performed and felt as if it were composed for the Lenten season rather than the Advent season. If we all performed at the same tempo everything would be so very boring.
Lots of these comments say 'Too fast!', but the way I see it that doesn't even make sense unless the speed detracts from the music. The opposite is happening here -- I think Koopman's choice of tempo brings out the rhythm of the piece better than any rendition I've ever heard. So don't complain that it doesn't sound the way you're used to -- remember that you're always listening to two people: the composer and the performer, and that each of us hears different things in every piece of music.
@hnaef83 It's true that each of us hear different things in every piece of music but I think this speed hinders the understanding between a first time listener and the piece. Sure if you played this piece before on an organ, it's comfortable to listen at this tempo but I think overall, it's meant to be played at a tempo that doesn't drag but is easily comprehendable.
....quanta ingiustizia....e poi ci sono i preti...
sono stanco di dover dire bravo...
si sa' ..sono bravi ,ma possono studiare, hanno mezzi che per noi sono fantascienza, non hanno fra le scatole preti ignoranti e istituzioni corrotte...
e in chiesa, oltre a pagare l'organista...fanno
suonare l'organo e i turisti non appestano le funzioni sacre..e gli incapaci non dirigono i cori...Non si puo' parlare di digiuno a chi ha fame(a buon
Presumptuous answer: because that's the correct way to play it. If Bach wanted it to be slow, he would have marked it as "Adagio", "Grave" or "Largo".
Simple answer: because it sounds better that way.
Artistic answer: because the title and text suggest it.
Cruel answer: because if you played it slow, it would be distasteful kitsch.
Why the hell did FilmTraum23's comment get a 'thumbs down'? It was an appropriately appreciative comment on a very beautiful piece of music. I have accordingly given it a 'thumbs up' to cancel out that particular bit of YouTube idiocy.
For my two penn'orth: this is one of my favourite chorales, played by one of my favourite organists. I'll say it too -- thanks for posting this vid!
una buena pieza aunque un poco rapida!!
luiarepa12345 2 days ago
Ton Koopman: Wonderful organist and all-round musician!
Fireball1787 1 week ago
Beautiful playing =D
Hehehe, because of the inverted colors on the manuals, at first i thought this was an interpretation on Harpsichord.
yanniblueman 2 weeks ago
Heerlijk orgel, dijk van een organist, maar een veeeeeeeel te hoog tempo. Waarom nou ?? nergens voor nodig !!!
registrant5 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
random fact just feeling like it...
anyone knows that this is actually a carol??? (yes im posting it around Christmas )"sleepers awake". when the reeds come in, tats actually suppose to be the main choir with the main tune! not the flutes or pedal/bass (lol) but the reeds in the left hand!
good interpretation but for my taste bit fast, love the stops settings. anyone can help me find wat stops r they??? 8' flute and a nasard for the great i believe and an 8'reed anyone help plz??? want to know.
TheME274 1 month ago
Das ist keineswegs zu schnell. Dem Choral liegt der Text "Zion hört die Wächter singen, das Herz tut mir vor Freuden springen. Sie wachet und steht eilend auf......" Da kann und darf es gar nicht langsamer sein, sonst würde nichts vor Freuden springen und eilend aufstehen. Bach hat da wieder wunderbar den Text vertont - wie immer!
kimujb 1 month ago
@stevtomato Dann scheint mir, dass Herr Koopman kein absolutes Gehör hat, sonst würde er bei einer höher gestimmten Orgel Probleme beim spielen bekommen.
KirchenChris 1 month ago
Ist die Orgel höher gestimmt????
Sehr schöner Klang. Der Choral ist für meinen Geschmack ein bischen zu schnell.
KirchenChris 1 month ago
@KirchenChris Ja, es scheint die Orgel höher gestimmt zu sein. Ton Koopman spielt/dirigiert diesen Choral für meinen Geschmack auch immer viel zu schnell... xD
stevtomato 1 month ago
Nice.
Improvisata 1 month ago
Ton Koopman quote about this performance: some organists play it faster then I do. Some people think I do it to fast but that is their problem XD
vanburikwouter 2 months ago
Which organ is this?
suuus1995 2 months ago
@suuus1995 It's the great Silbermann organ
vanburikwouter 2 months ago
@suuus1995 Edit: it's the Silbermann organ in Freiburg, Germany
vanburikwouter 2 months ago
@vanburikwouter Yes the builder of Freiburg im Breisgau cathedral organ is actually Gottfried Silbermann (1683-1753). He was the brother and the pupil in organ building of Andreas Silbermann (1678-1734). These two brothers shared the business territories. Gottfried worked in Bade Würtemberg while Andreas worked in Alsace, the next door region which was part of France yet. Both of them are famous. Andreas learned french organ building in Paris (1704-1706) with François Thierry
frenchiecocorico1 1 week ago
W jakim kościele gra ?
mirodziki 2 months ago
zu schnell ZU Schnell ZUSCHNELL und die Triller - nein - I am sorry you are brilliant no doubt and no matter I cannot condone this kind of playing my works - Why - is the Church on fire and firebrigade nowherere to be seen - sorrry for my mediocre English - JSBach Hochachtungsvoll von Leipzig as you know
Mrababab121212 2 months ago
Why is it said that this is a transcription from the Cantate Wachet auf ruft uns die stimme (BWV 140)? it's clearly from Zion hört die Wächter singe
vanburikwouter 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vanburikwouter Well, while it *is* a transcription of Bach's setting of "Zion hört die Wächter singen" that is of course just the second verse of "Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme" so is isn't wrong to describe this as being "a transcription from the Cantate Wachet auf ruft uns die stimme (BWV 140)" because that is exactly what it is!
md95065 1 month ago
I prefer the "NON" mechanical Bach. This is just that. Great. Why oh why did he have to fuck everythin g up tho with his annoying mechanical crap he wrote as well.
Malloyism 3 months ago
@Malloyism fuck you, there is nothing annoying and crappy about any of bachs music.
philateliceun 2 months ago
@philateliceun According to you mate. A purist no doubt. I most definately am not. GFH never bothered himself with that mechnicval crap just to please the likes of you. he only composed music pleasing to the ear not the mind.
Malloyism 2 months ago
@Malloyism Your ear doesn't understand music, only your brain does. I can understand you don't like the style but to call it crap is just being a arrogant know it all.
philateliceun 2 months ago
@philateliceun Not true Sir. I said only his mechanical stuff. I like most of JSB music just not the fast repetative style. His harmonies and choral pieces are very pleasing to the ear. french Suite played on either piano.harpsichord or organ is my fave. cheeers
Malloyism 2 months ago
@Malloyism I think you obviously know nothing about Bach, and about music as well. So, dont talk about what you cant understand
Stehnz 2 months ago
@philateliceun I like a lot of music lovers do not wish to understand music. We simply wish to enjoy what is pleasing to our ears mate. I cant understand you. Why is it almighty neccesary to have to understand music. Why cant i just enjoy some of it and dislike some of it. Your an idiot .
Malloyism 2 months ago
@Malloyism What? If you read a book do you just read the letters or do you try to understand the book? If you look at a painting do you just look at it and hope something comes at you or do you try to understand why the painter painted what he painted? Same with music, you can just sit there and let the waves hit your eardrum or you can try to understand why he chose those notes or why he chose that theme or instrument. And sir, I am certainly not an idiot, asshole would be correct though.
philateliceun 2 months ago
@Malloyism And ofcourse you can dislike stuff, I never said you can't. Its just that when you say stuff like mechanical crap you sound very ignorant . I myself don't like Mozart, I get bored listening to it but I will never call it monotone crap cause I know it isn't and I would be very ignorant in saying so. If you call the music of the greatest composer who ever walked this earth crap just because you don't like it it comes over as being a bit of an ignorant asshole.
philateliceun 2 months ago
Is he trying to catch up with MCA?
edwald1969 3 months ago
Perchè " corre" così non riesco ad Amare tutti i suoni!!!!!!!!!
campanesganny 3 months ago
Es ist zu schnell.
renatoamoroso 4 months ago
Ce tempo illustre bien ce thème des vierges sages et des vierges folles, très bon ! D.BABEL
SuperBabel2 4 months ago
@SuperBabel2 Ben ça alors. Et moi qui croyais que c'était le choral du Veilleur (ce qui correspond au titre) ! Ce serait donc celui des vierges folles ou des vierges sages. Autre nouvelle surprenante, on peut donc être sage et folle à moins que ce ne soit folle et sage ? Quelle panade..
frenchiecocorico1 1 week ago
@frenchiecocorico1 bonjour, cher ami...ne pas connaitre ce thème des vierges folles et des vierges sages dénote une inculture gigantesque, au lieu de moquer, mettez-vous donc au courant de ce thème tellement connu...! D.BABEL
SuperBabel2 5 days ago
@SuperBabel2 Vis à vis d'un organiste qui connait ce choral et son histoire depuis de nombreux lustres, votre remarque est idiote.
Mon observation était humoristique, mais votre commentaire démontre que vous n'avez aucune subtilité d'esprit ni aucun humour. Croyez vous être seul à detenir la culture ?
Ce choral doit être appelé le " choral du veilleur" car il correspond à l'air de ténor de la cantate BWV140 où le veilleur appelle les vierges à se réveiller ( Mathieu Chap 25 vers. 1 à 13)
frenchiecocorico1 5 days ago
@frenchiecocorico1 Hé bien, voila ! je constate que vous savez vous rattraper, bel effort, je salue...bravo ! D.BABEL
SuperBabel2 5 days ago
@SuperBabel2 Je n'ai eu aucun effort à faire pour me "rattraper" alors que c'est vous qui vous êtes rétaler, c'est là toute la différence. Ne prenez pas votre cas pour une généralité qui ne me concerne pas ...dommage !
frenchiecocorico1 5 days ago
@frenchiecocorico1 Décidément, sans commentaire!!! (soignez tout de même la syntaxe, et surveillez vos fautes d’orthographe...) car à ce moment, le prétendu ridicule change de camp... D.BABEL
SuperBabel2 5 days ago
@SuperBabel2 Commencez par surveiller vous même votre orthographe et votre syntaxe avant de donner des conseils aux autres. Vous démontrez une fois encore que le ridicule s'acharne sur vous. Surtout soyez plus modeste et circonspect dans vos jugements.
frenchiecocorico1 5 days ago
Lovely! Suprising but very nice tempo! It's not too fast but joyful. This is a perfect example how you can create almost a new piece of the same piece with a new tempo. Well done!
MacyMabelle 4 months ago 2
The tempo was, at first, surprising...then, grew on me...until I became mesmerized and hey, why not? He plays beautifully.
Starreacher29 4 months ago
As usual Mr Koopman seems to be saying "Listen mum, how fast I can play"
As usual it is 10 % Bach and 90 % Koopman.
bihonning 5 months ago
I enjoyed the interpretation. The tempo made it lovely!
rcabeceiras 5 months ago
I heard he had bad diarrhea.
Bleecker32 5 months ago
Yes, its too fast! Im professional musician too... Music means for me to FEEL anything... not to show how nice and quick i can play an uneasy trio piece on the organ... I really apreciate the phrasing and detailed work in all three voices, but the tempo destroys the feeling for me.
Tom111267 5 months ago
The tempo is perfect.
PTR131 5 months ago
Ton Koopman, GENIAL. Una interpretación impecable. Gracias.
PaulusLXXX 6 months ago
slow and pronounced .... fast and clear .... the possibilities are even infinite ... and I must say: most of them are fantastic .... even this ... :-)
AlecTrevalyn 6 months ago
Dejá respirar la musica por el amor de cielo!!! ¿Tenes que volver a tu casa que estas tan apurado?
pablov1973 6 months ago
Being an organist myself, I DO find this to be a little too fast and static, but what a performance! His technique is divine! Would love to hear him play the famous F Major Toccata by Widor!
Machru 6 months ago
Es muy conmovedor la trama, las vicisitudes de la melodía en su dinámica, su tropismo ascendente. concuerdo con clashtitans2: impresionante rendimiento! lleno de vitalidad
DarivsArgentina 7 months ago
Brrravo Ton!
nonnopirro52 7 months ago
amazing performance! filled with vitality and a sense of movement from Bach's rich harmonies.
clashtitans2 7 months ago
for those who think the tempo is too fast, try Andre Isoir's version.
jtingyz 7 months ago
Wonderfully played. I like most of Koopman's interpretations. They are full of life. Thanks for sharing.
renaissoque777 8 months ago
I just shed a tear of joy....
poopingeneral 8 months ago
I have no idea how anybody can be that coordinated.
Samoriah 8 months ago
This is one of my favorite pieces of all time, and by far my favorite of Bach's chorale preludes. Its beauty brings tears to my eyes.
mbrsart 9 months ago
aa still listing it like every week 2 times .. and evertime I lisitng it .. I got tears .. this is SOO beautifull
Darkboy2525 9 months ago
Ton is the best organ player I know, he can play with great articulation differences
mrleoviolino 9 months ago
Great registration. 5/5. :D
themates46 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If there is a god in heaven, he will send thunder and lightning over the head of those who complain about this execution
yougeeaw1 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Simply horrible!!! :( Poor Bach!
DeusMisereremei 9 months ago
@DeusMisereremei such a poor opinion, you should tell us why do you think this is ''horrible''
Mike1245690 9 months ago
@Mike1245690 Dear friend, I think so because Ton Koopman betrays the real Bach's taste and Bach's mind. We know how Bach wants we play the organ. J.N. Forkel, a great friend of his sons, tells us that he played the organ as a choir singing an hymn: spiritual, solemn, not fast, with a great liturgic taste. Koopman is a very good harpsichordist, but on he plays the organ without respect Bach's wishes. We have to listen Schweitzer, Germani, Vierne and Ruebsam, if we want to listen really Bach.
DeusMisereremei 9 months ago
@DeusMisereremei I like Koopman's tempo but that's all. In my opinion Koopman made too many mordents and trills... If you wanna know who's my favourite organist my answer is direct - Martin Sander. Try to find his CD on the net, his recordings of Passacaglia c moll or Nun komm', der Heiden Heiland are amazing.
geuros 8 months ago
Comment removed
DeusMisereremei 9 months ago
@Mike1245690 And forgive me for my very bad english. I am an Italian boy! :)
DeusMisereremei 9 months ago
Idk if its him... but someone here is totally loaded no joke
sirhonestharry 10 months ago
Which organ is this? Koopman seems to play most of his organ works on this
TheLivingHeiromartyr 10 months ago
@TheLivingHeiromartyr
It's the great Silbermann-Organ of the St.Mary's Church at Freiberg, Sachsen, Germany.
MisterRudolf 9 months ago
I wouldn't play it any faster than that.
Classicalguy12 10 months ago
Great!!!!!!!!!!
gerd6604 10 months ago
Awesome...Bach forever and ever..
murcia1975 11 months ago
I agree, I think this piece should be played slightly faster. It's such a movingly beautiful melody--these kinds of pieces have the ability to really materialize the Lord in all of His glory. I think this particular organ has a wonderful sound, and I personally love the interpretation. I understand, perhaps Bach meant it to run slightly slower... but this performance certainly gives this piece justice. I could listen to this forever.
LikeWiseLikeYou 11 months ago
I loved this interpretation. In my opinion, it is played entirely too slow most of the time, so this is very refreshing.
WSamuelJackson 11 months ago
Koopman for me is undoubtedly the best interpreters of Baroque music (in this case of Bach). An ability to combine rigorous historicist inventiveness and novelty, particularly in ornamentation, phrasing and breath articulation. Moreover, for composers and musicians of the Baroque period, the improvisation was much more frequent than is practiced today in the interpretations.
And Bach is a genius, by far my favorite composer!
JosePedroMoutinho 1 year ago 2
Koopman for me is undoubtedly the best interpreters of Baroque music (in this case of Bach). An ability to combine rigorous historicist inventiveness and novelty, particularly in ornamentation, phrasing and articulation of breath work. Moreover, for composers and musicians of the Baroque period, the improvisation was much more frequent than is practiced today in the interpretations.
And Bach is a genius, by far my favorite composer!
JosePedroMoutinho 1 year ago
Das Tempo ist grandios! normalerweise schläft man bei dem Stück ein. aber hier ist wirklich eine dynamik drin, die einen automatisch mitsummen lässt!
MisterRudolf 1 year ago
this shit is waayy too damn fast
88washme 1 year ago
amazing
TheKingOfAmazement 1 year ago
What a superb rendition. Tempo a bit surprising at first, but it reveals the joy of the piece, and will now inform my listening to other performances. Thank you Mr Koopman.
RevdRichard 1 year ago
Is not it a part of BWV 140?
Marzziooo 1 year ago
@Marzziooo Bach transcribed and adapted the 4th movement (tenor solo) from BWV 140 into an organ solo work, BWV 645.
rrchapman 9 months ago
@rrchapman Thank you for the explanation!
Marzziooo 9 months ago
Merci Mr Koopman, on redécouvre à chacune de vos interprétations ce qui avait été oublié...la pulsation baroque parce qu'elle nécessite une technique parfaite et que beaucoup d'organistes ne maitrisent pas cette technique de l'instrument...alors ils diront que le tempo est trop rapide mais ce n'est en fait qu'une excuse pour la paresse de leurs mains de de leurs pieds ....peu arriveront à rendre à l'œuvre de Bach cette pulsation ....on disait aussi à Bach qu'il jouait trop vite !!!
vousavezditbaroque 1 year ago
Somebody should make an alarm clock that plays this.
stephaniejimmymatt 1 year ago
my mobile phone does tho it has no bass to speak of.
grandadpoppyable 1 year ago
my mobile phone does tho it has no bass to speak of.
Tho I get ur point about the clock.
grandadpoppyable 1 year ago
The Organ is singing by his Technique.
nyantasystems 1 year ago
@artois54 You are seriously wrong. The tempo is just good. and non-musician and hecan't feel bach's music??? You know less about yourself that koopman knows about bach.
MkdMetalec 1 year ago
Erfrischend!
melvis24 1 year ago
this guy has rubber consoles on,an organ player ones told me u need leather soles on to slide acrose the petals to make more easyer for me?
88washme 1 year ago
i love sleepers awake, ad i love that noise too ans i also think that this is a good tempo along with it too
88washme 1 year ago
how can you not like this? its a wonderful song and reminds me of something...i've been knowing it for years... o.o
ilovemybestvideos 1 year ago
one of my all time favourites <3 thank you!
Giulia142593 1 year ago
troppa fretta!
fossosejore 1 year ago
Un Grand pour la musique de JS BACH!
ANTOONMAKA 1 year ago
What a beautiful looking console. The organ sounds amazing
TheKingOfAmazement 1 year ago 2
where is this church?
pievatol 1 year ago
That this organ is used by the teacher? In which church is it?
amicoassoluto70 1 year ago
Simply nice! Beautiful registration. Organ and church are both amazing. This choral is in E flat major, but organ are transposed +2 semi-tones, so it's in F major. I like his articulation too. All in all, it's perfect.
geuros 1 year ago
This song is on my Yamaha Keyboard and I play it all the time, I love it!
DemonSlayerThe3rd 1 year ago
Mr.Koopman's wonderfuuuul!!!!!!
violinistx100 1 year ago
JSB wrote it for St. Thomas Church in Leipzig, and the probable first execution was on November 25 1731
buriedverydeep 1 year ago
the better one compared to other interpretations, one wakes up by Koopman, and as an extra a beautifull registering.i like it but cant be awake moving in his tempo.
12345qazx1 1 year ago
How can one possibly ask ''how come it would be so very boring if we all performed at the same tempo?!'' What a stupid question! Isn't it obvious?! Why do you think that there are so many different performers/conductors/artists who record the complete works of Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, etc. which have already been recorded thousands of times?! Answer. . . because it gives us DIFFERENT interpretations. This is why we all have our favorite performers and interpreters. Different people move us.
musicaorganum 1 year ago 3
May I take a liberty add onto your comments about interpretation? The thing most people fail to realize about this is that the true Baroque style, "Stylus Phantasticus", is how they composed music, understood it and performed. It basically means no limits, total freedom. Bach's music is made to be played differently. A modern understanding of the music never works with Baroque music, "To play exactly as Bach did", a truly obsolete pretense. Bach would have played it differently every time.
advisorC101 1 year ago 2
You are exactly right, Sir. It seems that people do indeed fail to realize this. We know for a fact that teachers of the Baroque era taught their students (as they were taught) to perform the music freely. And as you mentioned, we also know that they DID NOT perform the works the same each time. Having said that, it is also known to us (from sources of that period; via various students, colleagues, and parishioners) that Bach himself was known to play quite briskly.
musicaorganum 1 year ago 4
@musicaorganum, Bach shocked and offended those closed minded Lutheran congregations of his early years. The ones that preferred a simple and straightforward approach to their music in the church services. It's just nature, when ever are tree's exactly the same? During seasons they change, and over their life they grow. People think that period performance is like building a bridge back to the stone age, all those that think so have no idea how horribly wrong they are.
advisorC101 1 year ago
For any real musician, Bach's music is absolutely endless. Just like his mind was. Pardoning myself from period performance for a moment, I also like hearing Bach's music on the piano or a Cavaille-Coll organ, and for me at least it works beautifully. Because it is so intricately crafted, in a universal way. Karl Richter says in an interview on YT that if one isn't inspired with new ideas of how to play a piece, (that are inspired directly by the composer), you play it with a disdainful routine.
advisorC101 1 year ago
And the fact is that the best interpretations come through consummate, artistic knowledge of the music and of the composer. This isn't an aimless interpretation (like some people that I won't name), it's Baroque poetry incarnate through sound. The idea is creating new life, that life, and either way you look at it, this radiates endlessly from a master composer like Bach through his scores. The color is there for all of us to find, it's just that some have no awareness of it and prefer "safety".
advisorC101 1 year ago 3
@advisorC101, the color for all our own personalities.
advisorC101 1 year ago
I couldn't agree with you more!
musicaorganum 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
About the tempo:
Praetorius states in 1600 that the tempo giusto of a crotchet is MM80.
Quantz writes in 1752 the same: MM80.
It was known that Bach could play faster with his feet than several organists with their hands.
Ton plays the crotchet MM 84, may be Bach played it even faster, but the tempo sounds perfectly okay to me!
kick030 1 year ago
Comment removed
kick030 1 year ago
To those complaining about the tempo. As far as the matter is concerned it's "sleepers wake up", not sleepers go back to sleep.
advisorC101 1 year ago 101
Thank you for your comment! There were many times when I have heard this piece performed, I felt as if I were at a funeral rather than a joyous occasion or such. This is supposed to be a happy piece.
musicaorganum 1 year ago
@advisorC101 Koopman also explains in a directors cut on this DVD (or perhaps another one I have) that he knows that some organist disagree with his tempo. His response is simply, "I don't really care, they can play it their way."
OrganoAeternam 1 year ago
@advisorC101 This is the greatest comment about Bach's correct Tempo ever done on internet! Seriously ;-D
Marzziooo 1 year ago
@Marzziooo, I'm not the one who thought of it though. There's a video somewhere on youtube where a wonderful young musician made that comment, I only now just remembered that. ^^;
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 I love this comment. Anyone who questions koopman's interpretation of Bach's music I just shake my head and laugh. First off I would love to see people who question his interpretation of the piece to A) play the piece in the first place and B) play it with as much showmanship and character as Koopman does. Lets get some freakin educations people. The organ is tuned higher than the modern "standard" of 440. So yes it sounds like its in F major. We know people...
Afaral1989 1 year ago
@Afaral1989, I disagree with you totally. Everyone has the right to question another's preferences for their playing a piece. It does not matter if they can or can not play it, that's just empty Ad Hominem.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 Go listen to someone else play it then....
Afaral1989 1 year ago
@Afaral1989, Why are you directing that at me? I haven't even said anything against Koopman. I was only pointing out that your contention is an empty refutation. Read the comment properly before you reply.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 Stop using big words to make yourself look smart, it just makes you sound like a lonely virgin. Plus read my comment correctly first.... i was saying i liked your comment about it being sleepers awake not go back to sleep. the second half of my comment was directed at you though. it was two all the other people whining about how it sounds like it is in F major. Fucking eh people. Your not the only one in world with perfect pitch. Stop bitching...
Afaral1989 1 year ago
@Afaral1989, If anyone here's bitching it's some empty guy like you who only gives a damn about fucking. Read my comments again you retard. It doesn't fucking matter what you were praising. I was only pointing out that you make a pointless statement about people who have a disagreeing opinion [ON THE PLAYING]. I actually agree about your comment on the pitch of the organ. Try growing a brain instead of an erection you fuckwit.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 in that case why don't we listen to the buzzing of an alarm clock?
robbayay 1 year ago
@robbayay, I prefer washing machines.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 technically its sleepers awake to be precise! :p
harveyfreitas 10 months ago
@advisorC101 ahahah, bellissimo!
nonnopirro52 7 months ago
''Too fast,'' says who?! Did Bach himself say so? It might be a little more brisk than how others are used to hearing it, but it does not make this performance too fast. It is supposed to be happy piece. I too, play it at around this tempo. Many times have I heard this piece performed and felt as if it were composed for the Lenten season rather than the Advent season. If we all performed at the same tempo everything would be so very boring.
musicaorganum 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
letsgowest 1 year ago
@letsgowest
Tempo has little to nothing to do with what instrument the player chooses to use. Tempo refers to the speed at which the player performs the piece.
ngroschen 1 year ago
Lots of these comments say 'Too fast!', but the way I see it that doesn't even make sense unless the speed detracts from the music. The opposite is happening here -- I think Koopman's choice of tempo brings out the rhythm of the piece better than any rendition I've ever heard. So don't complain that it doesn't sound the way you're used to -- remember that you're always listening to two people: the composer and the performer, and that each of us hears different things in every piece of music.
hnaef83 1 year ago 14
@hnaef83 It's true that each of us hear different things in every piece of music but I think this speed hinders the understanding between a first time listener and the piece. Sure if you played this piece before on an organ, it's comfortable to listen at this tempo but I think overall, it's meant to be played at a tempo that doesn't drag but is easily comprehendable.
RedWasabii 1 year ago
You are good, but you play it too fast (:
Cama115 1 year ago
...scusate....sono Italiano!
leonboelmann 2 years ago
....quanta ingiustizia....e poi ci sono i preti...
sono stanco di dover dire bravo...
si sa' ..sono bravi ,ma possono studiare, hanno mezzi che per noi sono fantascienza, non hanno fra le scatole preti ignoranti e istituzioni corrotte...
e in chiesa, oltre a pagare l'organista...fanno
suonare l'organo e i turisti non appestano le funzioni sacre..e gli incapaci non dirigono i cori...Non si puo' parlare di digiuno a chi ha fame(a buon
intenditor).scusate lo sfogo!
leonboelmann 2 years ago
very well done-- just too fast
GarthW2 2 years ago
definitely a wake-up call! Love it - which stop is he playing the chorale melody on?
fynnjamin 2 years ago
Definitely with the Trompet 8' on the Hauptwerk. Possibly also with the HW Principal 4'
pcstratmanB 1 year ago
Erg knap wat Ton Koopman hier doet, maar het is veel te snel, dat is jammer.
nijlie74 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Es ist sehr schön.
Uwe941 2 years ago
I love this music especially now, at Christmas time...
KurochanNeco 2 years ago 3
Amazing, really. Ton Koopman is one of the best organ players of our years. Great.
andreone85 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why so fast!?
aelf29 2 years ago
Because the words say:
"Zion hears the watchmen sing; her heart springs in joy; she awakens and rises in haste; ..."
dropletdreamcometrue 2 years ago 4
True, for Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme it's a bit fast. But that's one of the greatness of Bach symphonies, it defy speed and time :)
mallubhai0MBBS 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aelf29 "Why so fast!?"
Presumptuous answer: because that's the correct way to play it. If Bach wanted it to be slow, he would have marked it as "Adagio", "Grave" or "Largo".
Simple answer: because it sounds better that way.
Artistic answer: because the title and text suggest it.
Cruel answer: because if you played it slow, it would be distasteful kitsch.
Take your pick.
Timrath 1 year ago 2
Most satisfying answer: because he can. :-p
Timrath 1 year ago
Wenn ich die Augen schliesse und diese Musik hoere ist die Welt wieder in
Ordnung!Kein Hass, kein Krieg oder Hunger, kein Leiden! Nur Frieden und
Verstaendnis und Freude!
Thanks for posting this vid!
FilmTraum23 2 years ago 21
Why the hell did FilmTraum23's comment get a 'thumbs down'? It was an appropriately appreciative comment on a very beautiful piece of music. I have accordingly given it a 'thumbs up' to cancel out that particular bit of YouTube idiocy.
For my two penn'orth: this is one of my favourite chorales, played by one of my favourite organists. I'll say it too -- thanks for posting this vid!
hnaef83 2 years ago 3
Where was this fantastic recording? ¿Alguien sabe en qué iglesia están grabados estos videos?
Lucasguitarrita 3 years ago 2
Dom St. Marien, Sachsen Deutschland
WolfgangSebastien 3 years ago 4