Hmmmmm... "Stuffings in little bottles of pills" would have been heartily buzzed on the $25,000 version... the judges were way more picky and didn't allow prepositional phrases...
I used to watch Pyramid going back to the early 70's and I do not think there was a better clue ever given than Tony Randall saying "little things in the bottles of aspirin" when it came to "Cotton things". That was classic and especially when they were under the gun.
This was from when it was on ABC from 1974-80. Yes, it was shot at that theater on W. 58th St. in New York City, called the Elysee, and yes, it was demolished in 1985 for a private school.
Well, all she got out of the word was "E-"... Since it was implied in the subject that all words began with "E", she didn't get buzzed.
There used to be a clip here on YouTube (now removed) where there was a tiebreaker in the 80s Pyramid and the subject was things beginning with O, and the giver said "A breakfast cereal....O---! O---!" for "Oatmeal", and it wasn't buzzed.
"a hoop on the street" and "stuffings in little bottles of pills" would never be allowed in the $25k version.. the judging was much more strict, you got buzzed for giving prepositional phrases :D
Prepositional phrases are too descriptive in WC play...besides, you could get around it by saying something like "pill bottle stuffing" for Things Made of Cotton.
It sort of progressed; they were VERY loose with $10; got better with $20; and 'perfect' with $25. I do prefer the Pyramids in NYC because the contestants were not as slick as in CA. I thought the show was great but had more 'flavor' in NYC. And put them out on DVD!
I enjoyed those contestants from the NYC run, especially the $10,000 and early $20,000 (Clark) /$25,000 (Cullen) era. They'd hit the jackpot and go nuts. Then again, none of them threw a chair out of the Winner's Circle as Bill Shatner did. ;)
I used to attend tapings of "The $20,000 Pyramid." Like most game shows in NYC (other than "Jeopardy!") contestants were selected from the studio audiences. You could find contestants from all over the country, unlike L.A., where it was just the little world of the laid-back L.A. area. Bob Stewart's own shows had a definite urban energy that just didn't translate well. But when L.A. snatched "The Tonight Show" (as if the Dodgers weren't enough), everyone else followed.
In fairness (speaking as a native and lifelong New Yorker), NYC was also a crime-infested filthy hell-hole at the time, so a lot of the flight was understandable. Also, our corrupt state politicians (nothing's changed!) and the always crippling tax and fee structure made the shows far more expensive to produce at the time than LaLa Land. But the LaLa Land remakes have always lacked the energy and excitement.
Ooohh yeah @ :59 LOL!!!
CJTurner95 10 months ago
I know this is old, but that guy's voice is sexy as hell.
Milktube 1 year ago
TONY RANDALL WAS THE BEST!
BARNEYFATSWALT 1 year ago
no that would not be acceptable, to descriptive
americanman2000 1 year ago
I agree with Dick when he yells "She made it!" on the word "Trance". I think she made it by just the splitiest of split seconds.
Derby14 1 year ago
Hmmmmm... "Stuffings in little bottles of pills" would have been heartily buzzed on the $25,000 version... the judges were way more picky and didn't allow prepositional phrases...
lobstertexas 2 years ago 2
a hot Tomato? lol
davidd2172 2 years ago
ECLAIR!
bballplayav3 2 years ago
good old Tony
holydiver73 2 years ago
This show is FANTASTIC! Why dont we have this in the UK???
georgelambshow 3 years ago 2
He should've been buzzed on the "...on the street" and the "... in a bottle" clues, as they are prepositional phrases and therefore disallowed.
ProfGlitch 4 years ago
The judging was different back then.
KoopaKid17 3 years ago 3
Yep...they could never have gotten away w/those clues in the 80s (although just saying "pill bottle stuffing" would've been acceptable).
WhatsAYak 3 years ago
Huge Buzz!!!
sethpac 2 years ago
Yeah the pill bottle clue was excellent, smart guy,
Ctmagnus 4 years ago
I used to watch Pyramid going back to the early 70's and I do not think there was a better clue ever given than Tony Randall saying "little things in the bottles of aspirin" when it came to "Cotton things". That was classic and especially when they were under the gun.
NosferatusCoffin 4 years ago
EPDMIC!
5star555555555 4 years ago
The Pyramid rocked!!
voicetube 4 years ago
What network was this version on?
sugarbear522 4 years ago
This was from when it was on ABC from 1974-80. Yes, it was shot at that theater on W. 58th St. in New York City, called the Elysee, and yes, it was demolished in 1985 for a private school.
byrd56 4 years ago 2
I love how the big pyramid is awash in gold. Gold is perfect because it represents riches, power and greed.
gameshowluvr86 4 years ago
And why didn't the judges pick up on JoAnne Worley saying part of the word "emergency"? Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but still...
WhatsAYak 4 years ago
Well, all she got out of the word was "E-"... Since it was implied in the subject that all words began with "E", she didn't get buzzed.
There used to be a clip here on YouTube (now removed) where there was a tiebreaker in the 80s Pyramid and the subject was things beginning with O, and the giver said "A breakfast cereal....O---! O---!" for "Oatmeal", and it wasn't buzzed.
UmedaRaton 3 years ago
Jesus, it all looks so '70s!!
gameshowluvr86 4 years ago
correct, the 1970's.
okiesteveus81 4 years ago
I loved that old theater on West 58th street. Same theater as where the Dick Cavette TV show originated from. Demolished a few years ago.
jellyneck 4 years ago
yea definitely not acceptable in the 25 or 100 K versions LOL
southernfratdude 4 years ago
"a hoop on the street" and "stuffings in little bottles of pills" would never be allowed in the $25k version.. the judging was much more strict, you got buzzed for giving prepositional phrases :D
lobstertexas 4 years ago
I didn't like that rule. I don't know why they added it...
KoopaKid17 4 years ago
Prepositional phrases are too descriptive in WC play...besides, you could get around it by saying something like "pill bottle stuffing" for Things Made of Cotton.
WhatsAYak 4 years ago
It sort of progressed; they were VERY loose with $10; got better with $20; and 'perfect' with $25. I do prefer the Pyramids in NYC because the contestants were not as slick as in CA. I thought the show was great but had more 'flavor' in NYC. And put them out on DVD!
fkd1963 4 years ago 3
I enjoyed those contestants from the NYC run, especially the $10,000 and early $20,000 (Clark) /$25,000 (Cullen) era. They'd hit the jackpot and go nuts. Then again, none of them threw a chair out of the Winner's Circle as Bill Shatner did. ;)
davemock 4 years ago
I used to attend tapings of "The $20,000 Pyramid." Like most game shows in NYC (other than "Jeopardy!") contestants were selected from the studio audiences. You could find contestants from all over the country, unlike L.A., where it was just the little world of the laid-back L.A. area. Bob Stewart's own shows had a definite urban energy that just didn't translate well. But when L.A. snatched "The Tonight Show" (as if the Dodgers weren't enough), everyone else followed.
Noveltooner 4 years ago
In fairness (speaking as a native and lifelong New Yorker), NYC was also a crime-infested filthy hell-hole at the time, so a lot of the flight was understandable. Also, our corrupt state politicians (nothing's changed!) and the always crippling tax and fee structure made the shows far more expensive to produce at the time than LaLa Land. But the LaLa Land remakes have always lacked the energy and excitement.
Noveltooner 4 years ago
is that wayne brady? :p
lobstertexas 4 years ago
Man,that was a close one.
blank77 4 years ago