Why don't people look at the effects of the sun to the temperature of the earth. And how it changes every X amount of years from hot to cold to hot to cold to hot to cold. so on and so forth.
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite for his findings. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
"Thus, the notion that environmental skeptics are unbiased analysts exposing the myths and scare tactics employed by those they label as practitioners of ‘junk science’ lacks credibility. Similarly, the self-portrayal of skeptics as marginalized ‘Davids’ battling the powerful ‘Goliath’ of environmentalists and environmental scientists? is a charade, as skeptics are supported by politically powerful CTTs funded by wealthy foundations and corporations."
"Debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge, rather, appears to be how to effectively communicate this fact to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists."
no rational human being rushes headlong into an unknown when there is even a 10 percent chance of death or serious injury.
Science has given the human race a dire warning with all the urgency and certainty we should need to prompt action.
the IPCC Third Assessment Report, Working Group 1 (TAR WG1), the most comprehensive compilation and summary of current climate research ever attempted, and arguably the most thoroughly peer reviewed scientific document in history.
@aerobique The IPCC report 100% ignores any investigation into sunspot or solar activity whatsoever. The IPCC report is crap. If the IPCC report had ended up refuting the solar activity information, they would have at least addressed it. But it's crap, b/c they only cherry pick the data they want, which upholds the lie of anthropogenic global warming.
He slow positive efforts to solve climate related problems by casting doubt on others opions especially
if they don't have scientific qualifications whilst he uses dubious facts and his own brand of pseduoscience to manipulate the opinions of the naive easily influenced multitudes for what?
To push his own work and to sell a few books? Perhaps as a spin expert for those who fear change?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I cannot believe this guy is a professor. Can you image going to hear a lecture from this guy. Must remember to bring a sick bag. The only thing this guy should be a professor of is advanced bullshit
I don't get the Christian comment, but whatever. Serious EE. I am not sure why you are bashing him. Have you actually listened toany of his presentation? It's less flashy then Al Gore's, but come on.
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
Oh yea , these science values have been around for 100 years. That will leave a scar.
The total cash spent to talk you into, global warming (we are all going to die) is about 64 BILLION BUCKS...Thank you BIG government..and big algore.... flush you and your corporations, Just for fun Check out AKA
" Blood & Gore" . Use this : blood-and-gore-veeps-firm-to-spend-big-on
Why don't people look at the effects of the sun to the temperature of the earth. And how it changes every X amount of years from hot to cold to hot to cold to hot to cold. so on and so forth.
ELREndLondonRule 1 year ago
@ELREndLondonRule Ian did.
markbohannan 1 year ago
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
.
Allen West 2012
TheModelification 1 year ago
2/2 watch?v=bgKr480RYc4 Obama's Former Green Jobs Czar and Communist, Van Jones
Admits Left is 'PRETENDING' Need for Regulations in Green Movement
TheModelification 1 year ago
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite for his findings. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
TheModelification 1 year ago
"Thus, the notion that environmental skeptics are unbiased analysts exposing the myths and scare tactics employed by those they label as practitioners of ‘junk science’ lacks credibility. Similarly, the self-portrayal of skeptics as marginalized ‘Davids’ battling the powerful ‘Goliath’ of environmentalists and environmental scientists? is a charade, as skeptics are supported by politically powerful CTTs funded by wealthy foundations and corporations."
tinyurl .co m/2fd8krn
aerobique 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge, rather, appears to be how to effectively communicate this fact to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists."
climate . nasa . g ov
aerobique 1 year ago
lol at diagrams
no rational human being rushes headlong into an unknown when there is even a 10 percent chance of death or serious injury.
Science has given the human race a dire warning with all the urgency and certainty we should need to prompt action.
the IPCC Third Assessment Report, Working Group 1 (TAR WG1), the most comprehensive compilation and summary of current climate research ever attempted, and arguably the most thoroughly peer reviewed scientific document in history.
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique The IPCC report 100% ignores any investigation into sunspot or solar activity whatsoever. The IPCC report is crap. If the IPCC report had ended up refuting the solar activity information, they would have at least addressed it. But it's crap, b/c they only cherry pick the data they want, which upholds the lie of anthropogenic global warming.
realjoefriday 1 year ago
@realjoefriday
lies, lies, and more lies... awkward oil-troll disinfo echo chambers...
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique And it's a load of crap.
mydogbanjo 1 year ago
He slow positive efforts to solve climate related problems by casting doubt on others opions especially
if they don't have scientific qualifications whilst he uses dubious facts and his own brand of pseduoscience to manipulate the opinions of the naive easily influenced multitudes for what?
To push his own work and to sell a few books? Perhaps as a spin expert for those who fear change?
ErikEarle 2 years ago
@ErikEarle You talking about Al Gore?
mydogbanjo 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I cannot believe this guy is a professor. Can you image going to hear a lecture from this guy. Must remember to bring a sick bag. The only thing this guy should be a professor of is advanced bullshit
ErikEarle 2 years ago
you bring nothing to the table... you sound just like a christian.
willowb22 2 years ago
What has christianity got to do with it?
SIMBER9 2 years ago
I don't get the Christian comment, but whatever. Serious EE. I am not sure why you are bashing him. Have you actually listened toany of his presentation? It's less flashy then Al Gore's, but come on.
blankowe 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
SEE Professor Bob Carter
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
8:41
9:01
Science is married to Evidence!
That is a WOW...
Oh yea , these science values have been around for 100 years. That will leave a scar.
The total cash spent to talk you into, global warming (we are all going to die) is about 64 BILLION BUCKS...Thank you BIG government..and big algore.... flush you and your corporations, Just for fun Check out AKA
" Blood & Gore" . Use this : blood-and-gore-veeps-firm-to-spend-big-on
...
upcountrywater 2 years ago