all modern tanks can kill another tank but in a fight it depended on crew and who sees who first cuz 1 hit is all it takes most of the time from this MBT
Interesting just how bad the T-90's gun stabilization system is, that could be pretty decisive in combat, especially given their problematic automatic loader.
true but the T-72 sported a 125mm smooth bore cannon just like the t-80, t-84, and now t-90s. its about muzzle velocity not the size of the gun when your trying to kill tanks. but not only did the iraqi's have bad armor but im sure chinese and russian generals know how to use their tanks better than iraq. the german army used to havethe best tanks and they lost so its also how you employ your forces.
Also, maybe you live under a rock, but like every single country but USSR/Russia, the Iraqis used shitty export models, T-72M, that didn't even have composite armor, no decent systems of any kind, didn't even have real APFSDS rounds, just steel rounds with only half-charge at that. Do note that most of the ~several hundred destroyed tanks were T-55 or Type-69, and many were unmanned.
T-72M does not even compare to the T-72B, which even today is better than most every non-Russian tank.
@GoldenZealot21 ok but the point i was trying to make is that it matters more who is using the tanks than what model tank it is. if your betting on technology alone to win the day you'll surely be defeated. for example, american shermans tanks against panzer mk 4's, tigers, panthers, stug assault guns etc...who had the better vehicle? and who won the war? and the tiger's and panthers were supieror technologically to even the russin t-34/85 or JS-3 stalin's. but yeah i must live under a rock guy.
I's either an Arjun or a T-84 Oplot, or T-84 Yatagan *There's virtually no difference between the two 84s, the Yatagan is a export version sold by the Ukrainians to the Turkish Military
T-84s look like much bulkier T-80s with much larger turrets. they're cylindrical, but all the extra parts make them look square
lol what western tanks can only shot 3km/h far? where did u read this lie? an Leopard 2 can shot 7km/h far and also when it´s moveing and jumping and it´s 65km/h fast so don´t talk shit
the Pentagon ask Russia for share the Arena technology to build a own version of it . btw the Arena-E is used also in the South korean Next generation Tank K2 Black Panther
t-80 in georgia my friend t-80 haven't been destroyed there ... sadly all 130 georgian tanks were destroyed 30 of them by 2 t-90... its enough georgia lost its army for 1 day ... russia lost 2 tanks... as you say hahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
man all of you shove that shitty comments up your asses and go live in russia if you all think russia stuff is better ok have fun guys hope you like hell. sinchronizator you full of shit russian tanks suck ass abram is better it took out most of iraqs tanks and iraq had the t-80 and the t-72 and the t-55 so witch means that t-90 is just an updated t-72 so go fuck your stupid moma
Not so GOOD? Germans think that thay equpmen was better in the world in the begining of ww2 - if WAR BEGIN IF THIS TANKS NO SO GOOD WE WELL CREATE BETTER - SO MANY GENIOUS IN OUR COUNTRY - GO RUSSIA!!!!!!!!! davaj davaj parni vseh slomaem !!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
man abram is better it can shoot on the move and none of the russian tanks can shoot of the move so witch meens the russian tank is not better and also the armor on the nato tanks are better the people in the nato tanks will not die and in the russian tanks the people will die so nato tanks are better so think better next time
strategy is different. soviets beat the nazis by numbers rather than quality. Ever since ww2, soviets believe massive numbers is the key. CHINA does the same.when it comes to tank design, soviet tanks meant to deep ford, and to out-surpress and out gun the western tanks. (125mm vs 120mm)
Just like the AK's vs M-16, so does the tanks T-90 vs abrams. you see the point?
I agree with u but in WW2 The soviet union had no time to spend drawing some complicated tanks like the germans did.and all the soviet tanks destroyed were old t-55 t-54 and t-72 with no modern modifications on them wich ment that they were much more vulnerable against modern tanks such as Leopard 2a6 or the abrams but i agree with u anyway
I posted:T-90 is obviously superior to M1A2 not To Leopard. Yes it's a great tank. Canadian Army have it now. They purchase over 100 of them. Polish army also have it over 100 etc.
but i'think that the m1a2 is a very good tank it have a very heavy armor and a long range l 44 canon that it's more powrfull than 2a46m canon of the t 90
actually i believe combat loaded with the chobam armor upgrade kit the M1A2 weighs over 70 tons. i could be wrong but i was actually in the armored cav so im 99.9% sure. and let me tell you ive had 30 abrams drive by us once and damn i would never want to be on the receiving end of that power.
You want to be in a heavy attack chopper when you face main battle tanks. But Russian and Chinese tanks have 125mm missiles which can shoot down helicopters as well as used against other tanks from a range beyond normal armor piercing rounds of tanks' main gun.
ust to point out that you shouldn't count the heavier weight on M1A2 as downside.
that's what you're doing with the T-90...
the T-90 has a cew of 3 ... it's much smaller from the Abrams... so go fuck yourself with the weight... it's suppose to be lighter since it's smaller but that dosnt mean it's got smaller armor...
for Vash6the6Stampede: another stupid one! You're right only if Tiger II had more protection than JS-3 - only because it was 22 t heavier. But this is wrong.
The M1A2 has a much larger internal (protected) volume than the T-90, almost 2 times more. T-90 has a greater internal volume to mass ratio. The Abrams would have to weigh around 85-90 metric tonnes to compare in armor weight. Don't forget that T-90M does have Relikt ERA, which is not only unbeatable by any NATO APFSDS, but can even through its advances and dual-layering defend against tandem-HEAT as well. Oh yeah, DU serves as bad armoring. But it's cheap, so throw it in M1
Well India has supposedly chosen it over T-90 but right now T-90 is stil their main battle tank. Arjun in my opinion is an ok tank but it would be wise to keept the T-90. There aren't that many Arjuns that have been built if thats what you mean.
T 90 fails to do well in hot rajasthan deserts...arjun uses moderate number of israeli systems and does well in hot climates...arjun was also tested with trophy active protection system...the Battle management system r quite similar to merkava...india used both russians and israelis technology...in my opinion it would b the best against any chinese technology...
well buddy indian tank arju has a much better first kill rate then the t-90 nd t-72 tanks,indian army is basically using soviet tanks including the t-90's,the drdo the makers of arjun have insisted that thier tank is better comapred 2 the t-90 n fr this competetie trials will be held i the month of july this year,smtime back thier was a test where a t-72 had fired on the arjun at point balnk n arjun survived,waitin fr the tsts 2 start
у Т-90 две вертолетные турбины по 1000 лошадиных сил вот и думайте какой танк круче
keksmen86rus 2 months ago
T-80 and 90 are over rated.
tyuru2 4 months ago
Fuck u usa. from the great nation Russia.
dacotw 5 months ago
Comment removed
dacotw 5 months ago
first song name plz????
simbadgo 7 months ago
rammstein!!!!!!!
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 10 months ago
yo mister i think you forgot the Al khalid
nadidin1 1 year ago
this tank is very impressive!!!
alokraja1 1 year ago
all modern tanks can kill another tank but in a fight it depended on crew and who sees who first cuz 1 hit is all it takes most of the time from this MBT
TeKnO2BaEr 1 year ago
i like the t-84 oplot-m its kick ass
TeKnO2BaEr 1 year ago
Interesting just how bad the T-90's gun stabilization system is, that could be pretty decisive in combat, especially given their problematic automatic loader.
Squatch347 1 year ago
because they're lighter and have good engines (1000 hp) and are designed with nice chassis.
Cnupoc 2 years ago 2
Some people just don't get it. They judge Russian and Chinese tanks based on Iraqi army's performance...
Do they even know that Iraqi only had the DOWNgraded export versions of one generation behind tanks?
Not only T-72 and Type 59 were really old tanks, but also the ones in Iraq were much much worse than the original versions.
Vash6the6Stampede 2 years ago 2
true but the T-72 sported a 125mm smooth bore cannon just like the t-80, t-84, and now t-90s. its about muzzle velocity not the size of the gun when your trying to kill tanks. but not only did the iraqi's have bad armor but im sure chinese and russian generals know how to use their tanks better than iraq. the german army used to havethe best tanks and they lost so its also how you employ your forces.
Rimasta1 2 years ago
@Rimasta1
Also, maybe you live under a rock, but like every single country but USSR/Russia, the Iraqis used shitty export models, T-72M, that didn't even have composite armor, no decent systems of any kind, didn't even have real APFSDS rounds, just steel rounds with only half-charge at that. Do note that most of the ~several hundred destroyed tanks were T-55 or Type-69, and many were unmanned.
T-72M does not even compare to the T-72B, which even today is better than most every non-Russian tank.
GoldenZealot21 1 year ago 2
@GoldenZealot21 ok but the point i was trying to make is that it matters more who is using the tanks than what model tank it is. if your betting on technology alone to win the day you'll surely be defeated. for example, american shermans tanks against panzer mk 4's, tigers, panthers, stug assault guns etc...who had the better vehicle? and who won the war? and the tiger's and panthers were supieror technologically to even the russin t-34/85 or JS-3 stalin's. but yeah i must live under a rock guy.
Rimasta1 1 year ago
0:42 is it Yatagan ukrainien tank
1:36 is it Oplot ukrainien tank
Rathnik1 2 years ago
Worst tanks of all time: Arjunk (India),
Biggest idiot:you
taylorbanned 2 years ago
I agree with you 100%
CullenFamillyTeam 2 years ago
Demonstration of mobility.
vtkrey 2 years ago
where is K1, K2, Type 90 - Eastern made tanks?
iloverebeccachambers 2 years ago
Lol,Indians are always trying to bring their Arjunk into Best Tanks list.
147saad 2 years ago 4
becoz they cant bring a tank from Quatar but they can bring sand though!
KarthikSoun 2 years ago
They should bring elephants instead.
Vash6the6Stampede 2 years ago
@147saad right on
nadidin1 1 year ago
what tank is that at 7:22
KHfreak7526 2 years ago
i think its an arjun but i'm not sure xD
relentlessaddict98jm 2 years ago
Ukrainian YATAHAN
Satanikterror 2 years ago
look like the t-84 oplot.. its Ukrainian i think
nabeelhassim 2 years ago
I's either an Arjun or a T-84 Oplot, or T-84 Yatagan *There's virtually no difference between the two 84s, the Yatagan is a export version sold by the Ukrainians to the Turkish Military
T-84s look like much bulkier T-80s with much larger turrets. they're cylindrical, but all the extra parts make them look square
It's hard to tell because that camera is shit.
Kastrenzo74 2 years ago
@KHfreak7526
T-80.
ukrain upgrade.
but still T-80.
rusbp 2 years ago
Song: Zerstoren-Rammstein
1SICK88LX 2 years ago
song dude?
cookiemonsterxlxlx 2 years ago
lol what western tanks can only shot 3km/h far? where did u read this lie? an Leopard 2 can shot 7km/h far and also when it´s moveing and jumping and it´s 65km/h fast so don´t talk shit
Nixdamasterhhe 2 years ago
is this rammstein? if not then wats the name of the song?
cookiemonsterxlxlx 2 years ago
@theGoldenAgeOfBoredo... you are wrong!
the Pentagon ask Russia for share the Arena technology to build a own version of it . btw the Arena-E is used also in the South korean Next generation Tank K2 Black Panther
CarstenOepping 2 years ago
yea those t-80 got toasted in georgia. ukraine is not smiling about there tank anymore. hahahahahahaha
jattdadanda 2 years ago
t-80 in georgia my friend t-80 haven't been destroyed there ... sadly all 130 georgian tanks were destroyed 30 of them by 2 t-90... its enough georgia lost its army for 1 day ... russia lost 2 tanks... as you say hahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha
sfs706868 2 years ago
rename it russian tanks i just see russian tanks wheres ROK tanks japanese tanks the others hello ????
TURKSTA19 2 years ago
The Tanks with an equal amount of Tan and Green paint are usually Ukrainian Tanks,
there are several Indian and Chinese tanks in this video, they are the ones with the square turrets.
Kastrenzo74 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man all of you shove that shitty comments up your asses and go live in russia if you all think russia stuff is better ok have fun guys hope you like hell. sinchronizator you full of shit russian tanks suck ass abram is better it took out most of iraqs tanks and iraq had the t-80 and the t-72 and the t-55 so witch means that t-90 is just an updated t-72 so go fuck your stupid moma
cookiemonsterxlxlx 3 years ago
Not so GOOD? Germans think that thay equpmen was better in the world in the begining of ww2 - if WAR BEGIN IF THIS TANKS NO SO GOOD WE WELL CREATE BETTER - SO MANY GENIOUS IN OUR COUNTRY - GO RUSSIA!!!!!!!!! davaj davaj parni vseh slomaem !!!!!
3dimon3 3 years ago
I think you should hit up aa---drinking cheap vodka has made you batshit crazy.
SweetwaterMC 2 years ago
lol they may drink vodka but they can consume alcohol for 3 pple ... or even more cheat effective making you fell burning...
sfs706868 2 years ago
0_o....... what?
relentlessaddict98jm 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man abram is better it can shoot on the move and none of the russian tanks can shoot of the move so witch meens the russian tank is not better and also the armor on the nato tanks are better the people in the nato tanks will not die and in the russian tanks the people will die so nato tanks are better so think better next time
cookiemonsterxlxlx 3 years ago
1 russian tanks can shoot on move
2they can shoot better on move and high speed
3russian tanks have better missles
4the russian armor and protection on t-90 is the best and newest now!!
sinchronizator 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1: tanks can shoot on the move for ages
2.1:the 125mm canon is shit, that autoloader is crap
2.2: the t-90 might be light, but is slow
3:the US doesnt make use of ATGMs in tanks against insurgents, but in can take LAHAt (better than the Svir)
4:the t-90 relies on ERA (NOT the best at all)
tell me if you want more detailed explanations
and correct me if im wrong.
theGoldenAgeOfBoredo 3 years ago
1: t 90 can shot when moves and when jump and kill target distance to 6km with bullet 125mm and with missle distance to 8 km!!!
2: 125mm is best cannon and bigest in the world-autoloader is faster in the wrold 3 shots for 13 sec
3:m1 and all western tanks can shoot missle and their fire range is 3km most to 3.5 km
4:t 90 can shoot missle and fire range is 6km with bullit and missle 8km
5: t 90 speed 70km/h western tank 72km/h only 2 km faster
6:t 90 best tank in the world
tonijocevski 2 years ago 15
@tonijocevski And th most important you can buy 3-4 T-90 for a new Western MBT.
Stratigoz 1 year ago 2
@tonijocevski totaly agree with you
htpm100 1 year ago
1 t-90 is fast not the fastest but fast 2 125 mm canon is good now only t-72 autoloader is shit 3 era is better then m1a2 .... armor
sfs706868 2 years ago
I imagine they would make a sweet target for an a10 as well.
SweetwaterMC 2 years ago
One of the best tank videos ive seen on youtube
And without those lists and my country's tank is better than yours crap:) (in the video of course)
There is something appealing in eastern equipment isnt it- wicked and bad-very bad . no wonder the t-72 is called Satan's tank
gh0stw4rr10r 3 years ago
Look at 1:00 - 1:11 - Insane :))))
3dimon3 3 years ago
segregator236 3 years ago
Of the Chinese tanks, it only shows type-96
liebstandarteadolf 3 years ago 2
awful sh1t
wwwrrr12345 3 years ago
think I saw its BRUTAL!! t-95
sfs706868 3 years ago
can't see t-95
sfs706868 3 years ago
so...where is the T-95?!
TadlosClan 3 years ago
strategy is different. soviets beat the nazis by numbers rather than quality. Ever since ww2, soviets believe massive numbers is the key. CHINA does the same.when it comes to tank design, soviet tanks meant to deep ford, and to out-surpress and out gun the western tanks. (125mm vs 120mm)
Just like the AK's vs M-16, so does the tanks T-90 vs abrams. you see the point?
code6870 3 years ago 3
mhm well abram... are very slow producing and expensive tank ...
sfs706868 3 years ago
I agree with u but in WW2 The soviet union had no time to spend drawing some complicated tanks like the germans did.and all the soviet tanks destroyed were old t-55 t-54 and t-72 with no modern modifications on them wich ment that they were much more vulnerable against modern tanks such as Leopard 2a6 or the abrams but i agree with u anyway
ukraina95 3 years ago
its russian tank lol
Vasiliy 3 years ago
indischer arjun ist einfach nur ein witz....
liuwanli 3 years ago
and what are your sources to support that claim?
saikiran1711 3 years ago
t 90 russian tanks can fight in Nuke Area :)
3dimon3 3 years ago 6
americans m1a2 abrams too , about 60% of the americans vehicles have NBC Nuclear Bactereological Chemical protection
LoSkiZZaTo 3 years ago
T-90 is obviously superior to M1A2:
T-90 uses guided long-range AT missiles - M1A2 didn't have them
T-90 has anti-missile interception defence - M1A2 don't have it.
T-90 has optoelectronic suppresion system - M1A2 don't have it.
T-90 has ERA of latest generation - M1A2 do not have ERA at all.
T-90 has autoloader of latest generation - M1A2 don't have autoloader at all.
T-90 is around 50 tons, while M1A2 is around 70 tons.
etc, etc, etc....will continue
Mintvan 3 years ago
haha continue dreaming
letnor16ll 3 years ago
No these are the facts. You are the one who live the American Dream.
Mintvan 3 years ago 2
no sorry i'm not american but obviusly the best tank is the leopard 2e
letnor16ll 3 years ago
I posted:T-90 is obviously superior to M1A2 not To Leopard. Yes it's a great tank. Canadian Army have it now. They purchase over 100 of them. Polish army also have it over 100 etc.
Mintvan 3 years ago
but i'think that the m1a2 is a very good tank it have a very heavy armor and a long range l 44 canon that it's more powrfull than 2a46m canon of the t 90
letnor16ll 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what is the problem ?!
i only say about the nbc , not for the rest.
T-90 has anti-missile interception defence - M1A2 don't have it. WRONG "miinphalanx ex11"
T-90 uses guided long-range AT missiles - M1A2 didn't have them WRONG TOW Lls-mk2 on the turret
T-90 has optoelectronic suppresion system - M1A2 don't have it. WRONG from 2004 they all have it
LoSkiZZaTo 3 years ago
Well, the weight differences is all in the ARMOR.
M1A2 is not 70 tons, it's 68 tons.
The extra weight means M1A2 has more armor protection.
Not that I am saying T-90 is a bad tank. Just to point out that you shouldn't count the heavier weight on M1A2 as downside.
Vash6the6Stampede 2 years ago
actually i believe combat loaded with the chobam armor upgrade kit the M1A2 weighs over 70 tons. i could be wrong but i was actually in the armored cav so im 99.9% sure. and let me tell you ive had 30 abrams drive by us once and damn i would never want to be on the receiving end of that power.
Rimasta1 2 years ago
You want to be in a heavy attack chopper when you face main battle tanks. But Russian and Chinese tanks have 125mm missiles which can shoot down helicopters as well as used against other tanks from a range beyond normal armor piercing rounds of tanks' main gun.
Vash6the6Stampede 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ust to point out that you shouldn't count the heavier weight on M1A2 as downside.
that's what you're doing with the T-90...
the T-90 has a cew of 3 ... it's much smaller from the Abrams... so go fuck yourself with the weight... it's suppose to be lighter since it's smaller but that dosnt mean it's got smaller armor...
Cnupoc 2 years ago
for Vash6the6Stampede: another stupid one! You're right only if Tiger II had more protection than JS-3 - only because it was 22 t heavier. But this is wrong.
MajorDumai 2 years ago
M1A2 does have more armor than Chinese and Russian counter parts. And this showed up in the extra weight.
Get real.
Not saying M1A2 is god. A direct hit from any Chinese and Russian 125mm main gun will kill a M1A2 even from the front in my opinion.
Vash6the6Stampede 2 years ago
@Vash6the6Stampede in iraq abrans were shooted from old rpg7
htpm100 1 year ago 2
@htpm100
And Abrams was still destroyed by original 1961 PG-7V round.
GoldenZealot21 1 year ago 4
it depends from which aspect you look on the weight tanks :)
sfs706868 2 years ago
@Vash6the6Stampede
The M1A2 has a much larger internal (protected) volume than the T-90, almost 2 times more. T-90 has a greater internal volume to mass ratio. The Abrams would have to weigh around 85-90 metric tonnes to compare in armor weight. Don't forget that T-90M does have Relikt ERA, which is not only unbeatable by any NATO APFSDS, but can even through its advances and dual-layering defend against tandem-HEAT as well. Oh yeah, DU serves as bad armoring. But it's cheap, so throw it in M1
GoldenZealot21 1 year ago 4
meet your enemies amerikKKa! thousands of these awaiting to smoke you... bwhaha i hope it happens. : )
1VoiceOfIslam1 3 years ago
any idea how this dessert MBT ARJUN is working?
I need some neutral sources!
Irwindragunov 3 years ago
Well India has supposedly chosen it over T-90 but right now T-90 is stil their main battle tank. Arjun in my opinion is an ok tank but it would be wise to keept the T-90. There aren't that many Arjuns that have been built if thats what you mean.
strizhi 3 years ago
T 90 fails to do well in hot rajasthan deserts...arjun uses moderate number of israeli systems and does well in hot climates...arjun was also tested with trophy active protection system...the Battle management system r quite similar to merkava...india used both russians and israelis technology...in my opinion it would b the best against any chinese technology...
selaloy 3 years ago 2
well buddy indian tank arju has a much better first kill rate then the t-90 nd t-72 tanks,indian army is basically using soviet tanks including the t-90's,the drdo the makers of arjun have insisted that thier tank is better comapred 2 the t-90 n fr this competetie trials will be held i the month of july this year,smtime back thier was a test where a t-72 had fired on the arjun at point balnk n arjun survived,waitin fr the tsts 2 start
sunnyboyyee 3 years ago 3
rammstien+Tanks=awesome
q4noobage 3 years ago
OMG FLYING TANKS!!!!!! EPIC VID!!!!
HeWhoCannotBePwned 3 years ago
almost all chineese tanks are ripped so they arnt "good" t-90 stays the best!
robvanmol 3 years ago
Just keep living in your bubble
liebstandarteadolf 3 years ago 2
Very good clip veoma dobar klip Rammstein+Mix of diff Eastern European Tanks= *headbang* :) T-95 is a monster
1SICK88LX 3 years ago
what is the name of the last tank shown?
LeoXiao92 3 years ago
Type99 has a stable system !
for real type 99 watch?v=MlD4PWb4TCU
at 6 min 58 sec
ltf509 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Type99 has a stable system !
for real type 99 watch?v=MlD4PWb4TCU
at 6 min 58 sec
ltf509 3 years ago
omg t-95 looks brutal
Mikelaren101 3 years ago
i wish i was serbian
ibaga 3 years ago
nice video but music....at the begining suxs then its good
21StCenturyWarfare 4 years ago
yavri yavri rules xd
hansy555 4 years ago
Nice video
Polenar 4 years ago
great video, i liked t55 in vukovar footage
Serbian1986sv 4 years ago
to je osijek, ne vukovar
hansy555 3 years ago
moja greska. u svakom slucaju dobar klip
Serbian1986sv 3 years ago