Watch the two recent video uploads on my channel that show the physical near sameness from Amerind to Olmec monument. These images are no anomaly. More to come.
This was a great a show. Too bad there are some trying to rob the Amerind of their own history. This comes in several forms; 1. Conspiracy theorists and their alien & Atlantis claims. 2. Eurocentrics and their Solutrean and Kennewick claims. 3. And of course the Afrocentrics and their claims - all part of the Continuing Conquest.
GREAT VIDEO! the camera gets different angles from all around more than once. I see my own relatives in these works of art. I share with them everything I discover, because its been denied to us for 5 generations. It's obvious to me that non-natives will always have some way to lay claim to what is ours. As long as we know who we are no one else can tell us. Honor the ancients.
damn that was here in frico damn!....and no!..no one is covering no black history and my ppl and i did not come from africa! i hate it when ppl like to steel others ppls history.
@MrPurepecha87 lol...yeah man, I was there. That Olmec head at the beginning was the same statue that was used on that book cover by culture vulture Van Sertima. For me, symbolically, it was like a slap in the face to those who claim African Olmec, and good. They deserve it.
seen the documentary who really discovered America on history channel, nothing was mention on west africans sailing to America in their flimsy boats LOL!
@1980vince So I am wrong in saying they look asian and black?Are you blind. What theory did I purpose idiot it was a simple statement. The Huge heads look like black people racist prick.How about you read "Cranial morphology of early Americans from Lagoa Santa, Brazil: Implications for the settlement of the New World" and learn something?
@1980vince You don't have to go back and forth because the Person who discovered the head was a Mexican and wrote about the Ethiopian features of the stone heads. His name is José Melgar,by the way he is a Mexican.The notion that Black invented these stories are fanciful and laughable. According to Europeans Native Americans are Asians who crossed the berring straights. Is it hard to believe that they may have crossed with black Africans also. Hawaii for example is made up of Blacks and Japanese
@ave383 look up olmec babies go to images.some have slanted eyes cause there newborns.some also wore helmets to protect soft spot(moyera).mexicans till this day are very cautious of that.no matter what anyone says to you creatures is not enough cause what's left for you but slavery.but that's not our problem.
@1980vince Constantine Samuel Rafinesque said that the Mayan inscriptions were probably related to the Libyco-Berber writing of Africa, He was white. José Melgar the explore who found the stone heads wrote about them and said clearly black people were here. He was Mexican.
@zinakan Please point to a racist statement. You are apparently ignorant of true history. Obviously you are not aware of the test done on the skulls that in ancient America.Interesting how the scientist said these skulls do not resemble modern day natives but more closely sub Sahara Africans,Malaysians,and aborigines. So call it racist all you want but it's in the science journal.Only thing that is racist is that you think Africans weren't smart enough to travel the world centuries ago.Racist
@1980vince It states Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that,the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans (narrow and long neurocrania; prognatic, low faces; and relatively low and broad orbits and noses). Thats straight from PNAS. So much for your claims of me not being able to prove a theory I never put forth.
@ave383 are you trying to convince yourself or others?... Do you know how silly it sounds to have 2 distinct races of people traveling for thousands of years to the Americas without mixing and leaving behind sculptures "resembling" themselves?..
@ave383 "Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric,recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians , the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans. However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples" Therefore, inconclusive
@ogpwr Wow I like how I send you a link and you interpolate without reading it. Here is what the link actually says without you editing it.To be continued..........
@ogpwr Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric, recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians,the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans.However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples.Continue....
@ogpwr Herein we compare the largest sample of early American skulls ever studied (81 skulls of the Lagoa Santa region) with worldwide data sets representing global morphological variation in humans, through three different multivariate analyses. The results obtained from all multivariate analyses confirm a close morphological affinity between SouthAmerican Paleoindians and extant Australo-Melanesians groups,
@ave383 Read the whole article. Most of the skulls samples they used where not in a condition to be carbon dated or to give any conclusive evidence. only 30 something of those 81 skulls were used as evidence, and at the conclusion they point out the fact that DNA and other biological studies disagree with their findings. You're on a mission to mislead people because you have a personal agenda and honestly believe that "Black History" was erased from books. BTW, there is no need for name calling
@ave383 I honestly think you should stop worrying so much about the ethnicity of American Indians, what you should be doing instead is learning from these people who were obviously smarter and light years more spiritual than we have come to be. Peace to you
@ogpwr Your right no need for name calling and My godfather is native American so i'm very close to them.He is the one who actually told me about the link between blacks(Broadly speaking) and natives. You believe that asians came across the Bering straight correct? You also said the DNA contradicts. It only contradicts when you have and establishment idea of science. Closed minded Idea. The Andamanese people are asian.look them up. But they are pure Black.
@ave383 so your theory is that Asian colonized the north and Africans the south, and yet your american Indian godfather told you of the link between them, even though they were separated by thousands of miles ?... That doesn't add up. And I didn't say that DNA contradicts what you said, the article you suggested I read states that.
@ogpwr No my godfather said blacks have been coming to america trading and settling for thousands of years before the white man showed up.From my studies Blacks came here and so did so called asians and they settled amongst each other. This same thing happened in Hawaii, Japanese people settling with Polynesians,creating the Hawaiians.Distance has nothing to do with it.Thats what boats are for. The current will bring you from africa to America.Do the research.
@ogpwr Once again the andamanese people DNA is different from others and has not been sampled to my knowledge. Their phenotype is that of a black person but they are considered by anthropologist Asians. Explain that.Black people categorized as asian.
@ogpwr The Andamanese DNA has not been taken If i'm not mistaken,they stay to themselves. But They are considered Asian by anthropologist but if you look at them there is no difference between them and a african.So the cranial of the andamanese people would fit their DNA would not.The Atlatl is found in ancient Africa, ancient Europe, ancient Pacific: But NOT in ancient China! that is at least circumstantial evidence that not everybody came across the Bering straits.
@ogpwr NARRATIVE OF SOME THINGS OF NEW SPAIN AND OF TUB GREAT CITY OF TEMESTITAN MEXICO,Author-Unknown Conqueror. The people of this land are well made, rather tall than short. They are swarthy as leopards (Black Panthers), of good manners and gestures, for the greater part very skillful, robust, and tireless, and at the same time the most moderate men known. They are very warlike and face death with the greatest resolution.
@ogpwr What we see with the Atlatl is contradiction. It is in ancient Africa and is in ancient Europe,but is not found to my knowledge in ancient China. I have facts that the white man has covered up black history. Roman Tacitus says the jews are of ethiopian origin,whites says they are white. Herodutus says the Egyptians are black skinned with wooly hair,whites says they are white. Richard C hoagland says a Black statue was stolen out of the sphinx by zahi hawass. No media picks it up.
@ave383 so a white conqueror describing Indians as being the color of black panthers is covering black history how? ... I really don't care where native Americans originated from, everyone originated from Africa and evolved to different races. Get over it, american Indians evolved into a unique race as well and had their own history too.
@ogpwr There is no such thing as race. Maybe thats your problem you think these discussions are about race. Color yes but everyone color differs.Father from son. Mother from daughter.The culture of the natives is the same culture of Africans.The sacrificing is Spaniard propaganda made to make the natives look savage, so that the christian conquered can justify the murdering of these peoples. Same method they used on Africans and Colored people alike.
@ogpwr Observations by Marshall Everett - stated that an Ainu chieftain had attended the Anthropology Exhibits at the 1904 World's Fair in St Louise, this allowed such close examinations as follow: "They [Ainu} are dark-skinned, and slow-witted, and their old men, with their long beards, look like patriarchs. They are almost the same height as the Japanese, but are heavier, and they haven't the almond eye... The Ainu have wavy hair, often curly.
@ogpwr Black is the predominant color. The hair of the children is lighter, and often auburn. All Ainu hair is coarse and strong... They are light reddish-brown in color, and have none of the sallow yellowness of the Mongolian. They have expressive eyes, and almost every Ainu's eyes are light brown in color. Black eyes are rare among them... Their foreheads are narrow, and slope gently backward.
@ogpwr Their noses are slightly hooked, flat and broad, with wide nostrils. They have large mouths and firm, thick lips. They have exceptionally long ear lobes.
@ogpwr The people of the andaman islands have been determined to be of the same genetic lineage as the Ainu of Japan.These are Eye witness testimonies,and science.If a white explorer visited a place and wrote what he saw then that makes it history. If he saw black people that makes it black history.What don't you understand?
@ave383 did u even understand what I wrote when I asked how they are covering black history ?. You're very twisted in what you say. I'm not an expert anthropologist or biologist so I'm going to stop speaking on the matter, you should probably do the same.
@ogpwr I can't take your comment serious do yourself a favor and do some research. Apparently you read some of my comments which give facts that you haven't looked at. Go to PNAS and type in"Cranial morphology of early Americans from Lagoa Santa, Brazil: Implications for the settlement of the New World". Theres proof your just not looking at it. I don't have to convince myself,because personally I don't care.Just teach the truth about history if your going to teach.
Watch the two recent video uploads on my channel that show the physical near sameness from Amerind to Olmec monument. These images are no anomaly. More to come.
blokcom 2 months ago
This was a great a show. Too bad there are some trying to rob the Amerind of their own history. This comes in several forms; 1. Conspiracy theorists and their alien & Atlantis claims. 2. Eurocentrics and their Solutrean and Kennewick claims. 3. And of course the Afrocentrics and their claims - all part of the Continuing Conquest.
blokcom 2 months ago
GREAT VIDEO! the camera gets different angles from all around more than once. I see my own relatives in these works of art. I share with them everything I discover, because its been denied to us for 5 generations. It's obvious to me that non-natives will always have some way to lay claim to what is ours. As long as we know who we are no one else can tell us. Honor the ancients.
LONEBLUE25 4 months ago
damn that was here in frico damn!....and no!..no one is covering no black history and my ppl and i did not come from africa! i hate it when ppl like to steel others ppls history.
MrPurepecha87 4 months ago
@MrPurepecha87 lol...yeah man, I was there. That Olmec head at the beginning was the same statue that was used on that book cover by culture vulture Van Sertima. For me, symbolically, it was like a slap in the face to those who claim African Olmec, and good. They deserve it.
blokcom 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seen the documentary who really discovered America on history channel, nothing was mention on west africans sailing to America in their flimsy boats LOL!
thug4Lifelrapcrapl 5 months ago
Comment removed
1980vince 8 months ago
These statues look like a mix of Asian and Black populations.
ave383 8 months ago
@ave383 well your wrong and cant prove your false theory.
1980vince 8 months ago
@1980vince So I am wrong in saying they look asian and black?Are you blind. What theory did I purpose idiot it was a simple statement. The Huge heads look like black people racist prick.How about you read "Cranial morphology of early Americans from Lagoa Santa, Brazil: Implications for the settlement of the New World" and learn something?
ave383 8 months ago
@ave383 i dont need to go back and fourth with you on this,because i know there native mexica.
1980vince 8 months ago
@1980vince You don't have to go back and forth because the Person who discovered the head was a Mexican and wrote about the Ethiopian features of the stone heads. His name is José Melgar,by the way he is a Mexican.The notion that Black invented these stories are fanciful and laughable. According to Europeans Native Americans are Asians who crossed the berring straights. Is it hard to believe that they may have crossed with black Africans also. Hawaii for example is made up of Blacks and Japanese
ave383 8 months ago
@ave383 look up olmec babies go to images.some have slanted eyes cause there newborns.some also wore helmets to protect soft spot(moyera).mexicans till this day are very cautious of that.no matter what anyone says to you creatures is not enough cause what's left for you but slavery.but that's not our problem.
1980vince 8 months ago
@ave383 watch my video olmecs are not black!!
mike3000gt7 8 months ago
@ave383 LMAO more ignorance! Your comment was laughable.
zinakan 6 months ago
@1980vince Constantine Samuel Rafinesque said that the Mayan inscriptions were probably related to the Libyco-Berber writing of Africa, He was white. José Melgar the explore who found the stone heads wrote about them and said clearly black people were here. He was Mexican.
ave383 8 months ago
@ave383 look up olmec babies some of them have squinted eyes cause there shown as new borns.some wore helmets to protect soft spot(moyera).
1980vince 8 months ago
@ave383 More ignorance. Do your realize how ignorant you sound??? Pathetic, keep writing that racist shit.
zinakan 6 months ago
@zinakan Please point to a racist statement. You are apparently ignorant of true history. Obviously you are not aware of the test done on the skulls that in ancient America.Interesting how the scientist said these skulls do not resemble modern day natives but more closely sub Sahara Africans,Malaysians,and aborigines. So call it racist all you want but it's in the science journal.Only thing that is racist is that you think Africans weren't smart enough to travel the world centuries ago.Racist
ave383 6 months ago
@ave383 more ignorance, keep talking your making YOURSELF look stupid.
zinakan 5 months ago
@zinakan Your ignorance is entertaining.Please do go on.
ave383 5 months ago
@1980vince It states Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that,the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans (narrow and long neurocrania; prognatic, low faces; and relatively low and broad orbits and noses). Thats straight from PNAS. So much for your claims of me not being able to prove a theory I never put forth.
ave383 8 months ago
@ave383 yea right
mike3000gt7 8 months ago
@ave383 are you trying to convince yourself or others?... Do you know how silly it sounds to have 2 distinct races of people traveling for thousands of years to the Americas without mixing and leaving behind sculptures "resembling" themselves?..
ogpwr 4 months ago
Comment removed
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 "Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric,recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians , the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans. However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples" Therefore, inconclusive
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ogpwr Wow I like how I send you a link and you interpolate without reading it. Here is what the link actually says without you editing it.To be continued..........
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric, recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians,the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans.However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples.Continue....
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Herein we compare the largest sample of early American skulls ever studied (81 skulls of the Lagoa Santa region) with worldwide data sets representing global morphological variation in humans, through three different multivariate analyses. The results obtained from all multivariate analyses confirm a close morphological affinity between SouthAmerican Paleoindians and extant Australo-Melanesians groups,
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr You are a lying bastard,but nice try.
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 Read the whole article. Most of the skulls samples they used where not in a condition to be carbon dated or to give any conclusive evidence. only 30 something of those 81 skulls were used as evidence, and at the conclusion they point out the fact that DNA and other biological studies disagree with their findings. You're on a mission to mislead people because you have a personal agenda and honestly believe that "Black History" was erased from books. BTW, there is no need for name calling
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ave383 I honestly think you should stop worrying so much about the ethnicity of American Indians, what you should be doing instead is learning from these people who were obviously smarter and light years more spiritual than we have come to be. Peace to you
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ogpwr Your right no need for name calling and My godfather is native American so i'm very close to them.He is the one who actually told me about the link between blacks(Broadly speaking) and natives. You believe that asians came across the Bering straight correct? You also said the DNA contradicts. It only contradicts when you have and establishment idea of science. Closed minded Idea. The Andamanese people are asian.look them up. But they are pure Black.
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 so your theory is that Asian colonized the north and Africans the south, and yet your american Indian godfather told you of the link between them, even though they were separated by thousands of miles ?... That doesn't add up. And I didn't say that DNA contradicts what you said, the article you suggested I read states that.
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ogpwr No my godfather said blacks have been coming to america trading and settling for thousands of years before the white man showed up.From my studies Blacks came here and so did so called asians and they settled amongst each other. This same thing happened in Hawaii, Japanese people settling with Polynesians,creating the Hawaiians.Distance has nothing to do with it.Thats what boats are for. The current will bring you from africa to America.Do the research.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Once again the andamanese people DNA is different from others and has not been sampled to my knowledge. Their phenotype is that of a black person but they are considered by anthropologist Asians. Explain that.Black people categorized as asian.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr The Andamanese DNA has not been taken If i'm not mistaken,they stay to themselves. But They are considered Asian by anthropologist but if you look at them there is no difference between them and a african.So the cranial of the andamanese people would fit their DNA would not.The Atlatl is found in ancient Africa, ancient Europe, ancient Pacific: But NOT in ancient China! that is at least circumstantial evidence that not everybody came across the Bering straits.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr NARRATIVE OF SOME THINGS OF NEW SPAIN AND OF TUB GREAT CITY OF TEMESTITAN MEXICO,Author-Unknown Conqueror. The people of this land are well made, rather tall than short. They are swarthy as leopards (Black Panthers), of good manners and gestures, for the greater part very skillful, robust, and tireless, and at the same time the most moderate men known. They are very warlike and face death with the greatest resolution.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr What we see with the Atlatl is contradiction. It is in ancient Africa and is in ancient Europe,but is not found to my knowledge in ancient China. I have facts that the white man has covered up black history. Roman Tacitus says the jews are of ethiopian origin,whites says they are white. Herodutus says the Egyptians are black skinned with wooly hair,whites says they are white. Richard C hoagland says a Black statue was stolen out of the sphinx by zahi hawass. No media picks it up.
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 so a white conqueror describing Indians as being the color of black panthers is covering black history how? ... I really don't care where native Americans originated from, everyone originated from Africa and evolved to different races. Get over it, american Indians evolved into a unique race as well and had their own history too.
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ogpwr There is no such thing as race. Maybe thats your problem you think these discussions are about race. Color yes but everyone color differs.Father from son. Mother from daughter.The culture of the natives is the same culture of Africans.The sacrificing is Spaniard propaganda made to make the natives look savage, so that the christian conquered can justify the murdering of these peoples. Same method they used on Africans and Colored people alike.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Observations by Marshall Everett - stated that an Ainu chieftain had attended the Anthropology Exhibits at the 1904 World's Fair in St Louise, this allowed such close examinations as follow: "They [Ainu} are dark-skinned, and slow-witted, and their old men, with their long beards, look like patriarchs. They are almost the same height as the Japanese, but are heavier, and they haven't the almond eye... The Ainu have wavy hair, often curly.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Black is the predominant color. The hair of the children is lighter, and often auburn. All Ainu hair is coarse and strong... They are light reddish-brown in color, and have none of the sallow yellowness of the Mongolian. They have expressive eyes, and almost every Ainu's eyes are light brown in color. Black eyes are rare among them... Their foreheads are narrow, and slope gently backward.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr Their noses are slightly hooked, flat and broad, with wide nostrils. They have large mouths and firm, thick lips. They have exceptionally long ear lobes.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr The people of the andaman islands have been determined to be of the same genetic lineage as the Ainu of Japan.These are Eye witness testimonies,and science.If a white explorer visited a place and wrote what he saw then that makes it history. If he saw black people that makes it black history.What don't you understand?
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 did u even understand what I wrote when I asked how they are covering black history ?. You're very twisted in what you say. I'm not an expert anthropologist or biologist so I'm going to stop speaking on the matter, you should probably do the same.
ogpwr 4 months ago
@ogpwr Do you even know who the andamanese people are?I can see that you don't.
ave383 4 months ago
@ogpwr I can't take your comment serious do yourself a favor and do some research. Apparently you read some of my comments which give facts that you haven't looked at. Go to PNAS and type in"Cranial morphology of early Americans from Lagoa Santa, Brazil: Implications for the settlement of the New World". Theres proof your just not looking at it. I don't have to convince myself,because personally I don't care.Just teach the truth about history if your going to teach.
ave383 4 months ago