Maybe use the money to finish some physics classes first. Why bother distorting the truth, yes he maybe splitting H2O using EM radiation, but how much does it cost to run the machine/microwave oven he is using? It's the old problem, energy input > energy taken out.
@medeerbeer lol i am totaly with you. What we just saw was the convertion of the energy from one form to the other. electric energy>>converted with losses to EM>>>react with water and ignite it (more losses of energy) >>> and then through the sterling takes back a part of the electric energy he consumed on the start of the story. But hey the ignition of salt water using EM is still interesting and amazing!
Wow, great. Now I can practically see idiots throwing microwaves into the ocean to set it on fire. Wait... maybe that's the reason mars is red... OH SH~
Now consider that we humans live on top of a crust that floats on top of a liquid molten core much like the sun that is always on fire. Inside the ground are all kinds of combustable fuels such as coal, oil etc. We have oceans of water that is capable of being converted to hydrogen. Our scientits are always experimenting. Radio waves bombard almost every part of this earth, microwaves are used to transmit satelite tv...
It's very likely that one day we could accidentally combine the right signals or waves that will ignite the world's oceans and cause a chain reaction that ignites the earths fuels simultaneously to turn earth into a fireball like the sun. It's amazing that with all of the underground ignitable fuels, missile testing, wars etc that this has not happened long ago.
@GlobalAwareness2525 Wow, never thought of it that way when actually writing it. Maybe it just didn't happen because the concentration of salt in the water is not enough but seriously this is a good question. With what madvlad666 says actually it would be possible if the water is under electrolysis so if you hold a microwave near the water you should be able to ignite it? Sounds fun.
Lets expand on that thought. This machine definitely uses more resources to ignite that flame yet the machine was never built to make a clever water candle, it was built to zap cancer cells with no concern over how much electricity it consumes. Like the first television sets consumed enormous amounts of current but just like all electronics the goal is not only to improve quality but to improve efficiency as well. This machine can be made much more efficient & smaller over time.
Another example is to look back at CIA's 1960s computer systems. They required large air conditioned rooms and lots of current was used for their operation. Your cell phone now has approx 6X the processing power of CIA's most powerful computers in the 1960s yet operates on the tiniest of current.
Probably the best example is the original pace maker. This electronic machine took up the entire wall of a hospital room. I forget if it were 60s or 70s but an MD with a vision told his peers that he could make that machine the size of a cigarette pack. They scoffed and laughed at him... but in time he did it. My point is that with improved circuitry devices use less current & even perform better. Now there are printable circuits. Truly amazing.
Yes, the reason I think this has incredible potential is because all it is doing is intensifying radio signals to a finite point. I imagine one might use the intensity of a laser to focus the intensity of the radio waves and/or as a transport method of the radio waves. But this will never be allowed to be used within the general masses as long as there is still oil to be drilled then when all tar sands are used up which is about 200yrs from now
and just a side note @dzgfdg why should anybody give a shit about letting the earth survive if there are no animals including humans to use it for what it is and all it has to offer. by your logic we should care just as much about all the worthless planets out there that do nothing for us that are uninhabitable just to make sure they survive.
First off this guy is amazing this is very cool shit. and second of all this could change the all of the pollution and depletion of the earth leaving it to regenerate its losses from the past.
The only way you can do it is to change their pattern magnetically or electromagnetically. I believe that magnetically is to be exact. There was tests doen over 100 years ago and it showed that magnetic object affect body behavior.
Actually a European Dr discovered what internal cancer really is. There is a process caused from humans not consuming sufficient alkaline foods. When the body reaches acidosis then exactly like in aquatics fungi grows in the blood & organs. Red blood cells clump like coins, white blood cells become lethargic & can't gobble up fungi or cholesterol. Fungi multiplies rapidly on organs then a skin layer grows around the Fungi. It is that skin layer that Drs biopsy, not what is inside the tumor
The medical association is working to shut him up because his treatments would destroy the medical industry. he was using an alkaline solution of sodium bicarbonate directly applied to the tumors which shrunk. it's all part of a process of acidosis, scurvy, flesh eating fungi, That's what cancer is.
Alkaline foods are also high in vit C or anti-oxidants. As long as the body is sufficient with these foods it will never fall into acidosis. If low enough levels are reached for prolonged periods of time acidosis, scurvy, fungal infections (cancer) ravish the body.
Anything that kills the fungi kills the cancerous tumors but it will all repeat again unless the body is brought back to a 7.4 alkaline state then everything reverses back to the state it is supposed to be in.
Once the body is alkaline then blood oxygen levels increase tremendously and cancer cannot live in an oxygen rich environment, cancer cannot live in an alkaline environment nor can cancer live in an environment rich in anti-oxidants.
If you want to cure cancer just follow the protocol of curing scurvy, it's the same thing except cancer stages are advanced scurvy & requires more intense natural treatments.
As are the machines in hospitals worth millions so nothing would change from that aspect but if this machine had a 99% success rate and perhaps a one time treatment vs many with todays chemo is huge loss in repeat business from patients therefore loss in income. Corporations are more interested in the bottom line than to actually heal the world because as long as there are sick people then the Drs get to have a very lavish lifestyle & nobody wants to give that up.
I was shocked myself. The dude above said oh right so I suppose this dude will die of some cause or another so I Googled it & sure as shit.
Notice the dude never replied back? Just another notch in the CIA's gun barrel. Or should I say arsenal of dirty tricks. One never knows if I stir up too much attention I could be taken out. I have had black helicopters circle my house but when I run inside for the vid camera they don't come back for an evidence shot. Maybe coincidence but never sure
@FreeGlobalEnergy ur an idiot. y would they want to kill this idiot...he created an inefficient way to produce energy, yea maybe they killed him for his stupidity
@dzgfdg Oh, I don't know, probably because the first pace maker filled the entire wall of a hospital, the first TV's were inefficient energy hogs, today's cell phones surpass the processing power of CIA's most powerful computers in 1960s. If you live long enough you see that everything becomes smaller & more efficient. That device was not built to catch water on fire but intended to be used as hospital treatment equipment. Re-designed to be an engine it can be made smaller & far more efficient.
@dzgfdg A lot has been accomplished with lasers, even lasers that bend which has scientists baffled as it seems to defy presently understood laws. Low frequency radio waves could be integrated into a laser as it's transport allowing low energy input within the finely focused beam intensifying output to ignite the water. Our future provides infinite possibilities with the never ending technological advances of clumsy inefficient technologies that exist today. Technological advances never stop.
@FreeGlobalEnergy how bout we just stop using technology and just let mortality rates increase decreasing human populations in turn increasing earths survival
@dzgfdg Sounds like a good plan until it is your own brother, sister, daughter or son. If it were your own children you would want to do anything necessary to save their life. Humans are heading for a dead end. We can't keep building homes covering the landscape. Slaughter houses operate at full speed. In 1950s my father used a bullet to down the beef dinner, now a rod penetrates the skull, sometimes misses so the cows get cut up alive & dragged through their own feces then we irradiate the meat
@dzgfdg What happens as you age, even if you'd rather die is pain sets in so you try to do anything to stop the pain which means you either seek out natural cures or you take drugs from the MD often times extending your life. It's human nature. Arresting Dr Kavorkian was a bad thing. Like in the 1970s movie Soylent Green we all ought to be allowed to check in to the hospital whenever we feel it is time to die & be euthanized but forcing people to live is very profitable to the Medical Industry
@dzgfdg What you propose will never happen from the standpoint of the citizen, it will not happen from the Corporations & will not happen from the Government who survive off of your taxes, nor will the world abandon technology, it will only continue forward unless a world wide cataclysm occurs & only a handful of people survive will they resort to living like cavemen
@dzgfdg What is killing us is our appetite for our computers, cars & oil byproducts. The factories that make all the items that surround you pump chemical waste & mercury into the oceans. People can't eat fish anymore without getting mercury build up. Lead & Mercury affect the kidneys which cause hypertension & nerve disorders which are all the diseases like MS etc etc & cancer. You & I sitting at our computers & drive cars all contribute to the problem but we won't stop until we all die.
John Kanzius Died, Fort Myers, Florida February 18, 2009 (aged 64) of Pneumonia.
Bacterial pneumonia: Inflammation and infection of the lungs & bronchial tubes that occurs when a bacteria or virus gets into the lungs & starts to reproduce.
The CIA is known to use bacterias of all kinds to either take out an individual or spread a plague in a particular country to weaken that nation in preparation to control such nation
And that is the beauty of CIA tactics as the more obvious would seem to be natural or explainable circumstances. I didnt save the video but CIA sometimes gets in trouble, mostly the CIA get out of trouble by saying information is classified but at 1 point congress was questioning a weapon they had which was presented. This was like a dart gun except at a distance would shoot a disolvable capsule into a person triggering a heart attack, the capsule dissolves & an autopsy would never find it.
I recently saw where there is great concern over the understanding of nano technology & how electronically the body can be made to go into disease mode. it was explained that every single cellular interaction functions by sending signals to other parts of the body much like any remote control signal. The ability exists to transmit signals to the human body that stop proper cell function which then brings on any type of desired disease
Neat stuff, using metal particles with the EMF beam might be new or recent. The rest of it was done in the late 1800's and early 1900's by Nikola Tesla and suppressed by our gov't. and industry giants. Poor guy stumbled across it and probably paid for it.
ULF (ultra low frequencies) are proven to effect a person's mood, and cause negative physical effects. The U.S. HAARP system is able to target large areas of the globe and bombard it with ULF's. And that's the tip of the HAARP iceburg
It's kind of similar to how depleted uranium weapons will cause the cell to vibrate at an incredibly high rate until nothing functions properly in the body bringing on disease. The CIA since the 60s have endlessly developed better covert methods of killing people. In reality CIA are terrorists, it is they're design function, when first started up they used Nazi's to learn torture techniques. That is all documented fact
I remember people's first reaction to the mention of military having electronic weapons, they scoffed, but now you can see the ones they allow us to see on video. Police now using microwaves as a pain weapon in crowd control. The advancement of electronic technology never stops & the military function is to ever increase electronic warfare & they do use the weapons for testing on American citezens.
Did u know that the drug companies are allowed to test new & dangerous vaccines on unsuspecting soldiers? This is true & the effects are debilitating as they randomly slip in the test vaccine. America is really not much different than Saddam in slaughtering his own people. The wars are all motivated by corporate profits, that's what vise president Dick Cheney was all about & many others that pull the strings in government. Money, war profiteering & skimming money off the top of programs.
The only purpose for the healtcare bill is the elite want more money, their lifestyles were recently crimped & they need a major program to skim more money off of in the same way two trillion $ per year keeps missing from the DOD budget.
The program we get will suck because the money left to run the program after skimming wont be sufficient to have a decent health care system, then we will be convinced to raise taxes again to beef it up. people get killed if they interfere with corporate profits
As you mentioned advances that increase output decrease size,but this is unlike a rocket as it needs much innovation before a prototype could even utilize the stored energy aka saltwater at all.This serves to be a great parlor trick at this point in time as non proto-technologies deserve funding Ex. Quasi turbine. Also let's hope he doesn't pursue any use in the medical field as first intended, because brain surgery through ignition of tumors would not seem the best option to say the least !
Well perhaps at this time it is equivalent to the first discovery of making a fire, who knew it's many uses such as the internal combustion engine. Perhaps it will be a century before this becomes useful but I think this discovery is significant and 1000 yrs from now this event will be historical.
Any discovery today no matter how insignificant will be the means of other combined technologies that will be of great value like todays jets cannot be flown if computers were never invented but look at the 1st computer. It was quite stupid & very expensive but centuries of continual advancements the computers capabilities far exceed the human brain. It is important to look at all beginnings of technology, see how it evolved then use imagination to see where things today can go
I remember seeing experimental walking robots in the 1980s
They were so awkward, so clumsy I thought, this is stupid, what a waste of time, just put it on wheels but to see walking & running robots today is incredible, the grueling persistence paid off, look at Asimo & all the other walking robots. Now I see that all futuristic robot science fiction movies will be future science fact. Pursuits today that seem stupid will have great significance in the future
I bet it takes like 1.21 Jigggawatts to power the RF amplifier to the point that ignittion is achieved to produce .5 kw power. WOW I thought Ethanol was a neato way to waste energy to produce negative energy. Now all you need is a mobile nuclear reactor in your car to produce the exponential amount of power that would be needed to produce the power to spark this FREE energy! why not just eliminate the water-combustion engine and just have a Atomic-Hybrid to simplify as this is more feasable.lol
LOL. This machine was never designed to catch water on fire, that's like discovering in the 1900s that if you put wheels on rocket that it makes an interesting car but not very fuel efficient.
I'll bet that if scientists put their brains together they could make this far more efficient.
The first pace maker took up an entire wall space of electronics. A doctor with a vision said he could make this the size of a pack of cigarettes.
1917 Nikola Tesla proposed to our gov't ...a " Exploring Beam " that he could make and it would show the exact location and distance of enemy planes and ships. They laughed him out of there. (Thomas Asshole Edison was on that committee). Yes, that means we could have had RADAR before we entered WW1, instead we had to wait another 20 years or so.
My point on the pace maker was that if u can imagine how much electricity it took with antiquated electronics filling an entire wall to the now smaller device is far less current.
The first televisions consumed a lot of electricity. Todays tvs u still accomplish the same goal as capturing a transmitted signal to see moving images and far more capabilities using only a fraction of electricity of tvs in the 50s
All electronic devices advance & use less current to operate with the same end result
If we could easily produce 1.21 Jiggawatts of power, couldn't we charge the Flux Capacitor then? lol
Maybe if you could produce that frequency with low power then LASE it, put it through a focusing parabolic lens into the salt water, it might be efficient. Might.
and besides, its not a generation of energy its just a transformation, because if you stop the E-field the reaction stops, so its not a so called "endothermic" reaction (like burning DIESEL in a combustion engine)
you are right, apart from your example given. the standard enthalpy of formation is positiv for the combustion of diesel thus it is an exothermic reaction.
Wow, ok so the amount of energy that is going into the RF wave is many times greater than the energy released by the combustion of the salt water. Of course the news always has to have an edge on everything it reports. Very interesting, but not really useful, that is unless you can somehow market it as entertainment...
You completely miss the point & significance. This machine was never designed to catch water on fire & no concern went into how much energy was used to run the machine. Anybody that follows technology realizes that everything is miniaturized & energy consumption is reduced. The first pace maker was a machine that took up the space of a 10ft wall. The doctor who said he could design one the size of a cigarette pack was ridiculed. Most people have no vision capabilities
I think he nailed "the point". The news and John Kanzius tried to say you could run a car engine on saltwater, but din't tell the enormous gas used to ignite the saltwater. If you go to his website you'll see noone has offered to invest in his discovery. He did discover something, I'll give him that.
@FreeGlobalEnergy I believe that I've seen the point just fine. The fact is that by channeling the energy through an intermediary substance there will always be energy lost without a self-sustaining chemical catalyst that is started by said energy. It's cool, however I think the usefulness of this machine has already been proven more in the realms of medicine than of NRG production. Guy's machine actually does help doctors cure cancer, that's way more cool! Free NRG is 2, but not the place.
I perceive things very differently than when I started this channel such as terms like perpetual or overunity.I don't think anything is perpetual (forever) or overunity but may only give the illusion of being overunity. So it seems that many machines are merely using highly efficient means of stored energy or force, be it magnets or the atom. Now Toshiba sells a mini self contained breeder reactor that will run a small city for 40yrs without refueling.That's an amazing achievement
It could take 100 or 200 yrs for people to realize the importance of this single discovery within the field of transportation or energy production & how it will take many other technologies combined to become very practical. Look back at the first flying machines dreamed up and painted on canvas or drawings, then how many centuries it took for those dreams to actually become a reality, one technological discovery at a time, baby steps.
Your concern was energy loss. Major solar panel advances have taken place in the lab presently not available to the consumer. The normal single arrays you see on roof tops now fit in the palm of your hand & produce the same amount of current through advancement in the way solar collects then sun's energy. It's these never ending advancements in solar & nuclear energy that ensures a future where energy is cheap (maybe monetarily free) and abundant
That is the future I see that fits my terminology of "free energy"
Once the device is built it feeds off of monetarily free sources of energy such as the sun or earth's own magnetic flow. You still pay to build the device but after that as long as the sun burns bright and the earth spins on it's axis then it is monetarily free energy. That is the path being taken. Smaller, cheaper, more powerful devices
excellent video. more please! We must remove anyone from public office who is culpable in undermining people's ability to obtain these more efficient power sources. Screw patents owned by giant oil corporations. OPEN SOURCE FREE ENERGY NOW!!!
amazing how gullible people are. It's basic grade school science...the salt water is a conductor, and the RF energy induces an electric current (maxwell's equations, 1851)..causing electrolysis (discovered in 1800)...and the hydrogen is burned (fire, discovered appx 1 million years ago).
Check out other videos posted by this crackpot FreeGlobalEnergy lol!
Energy has always been free! Example? You take one potato, you plant it in the ground, and what happens? 10 potatoes come out! - OMG FREE ENERGY! That is correct. Open your eyes guys!
...so this machine could just be the potato that we have to plant... and there are many more like this one.
So if energy is FREE, who the ffff on earth make us pay for it?
Think about that and get creative, so we can have free energy AGAIN.
The energy is taken from earth with no different from the food you eat. Meaning the earth doesn't gain any weight or lose any at all, because the materials taken from earth is recycled back, meaning if you were to take the energy from the earth, you will only be depleting the earths natural resources, however true free energy is available but hard to obtain, Nikola tesla already gone through it and his invention was lost and stolen by the government.
This device is not using salt water as fuel. It will take energy to produce the electromagnetic radiation. I doubt that this device even puts out the energy than it consumes generating radio waves.
Selective burning of cancer cells... seems like an old idea. However it is still not part of regular cancer treatment. Sounds like less painful treatment. Hope they can progress it.
What is important is how efficient this is; it sounds to me like his machine generates EMR that (like a microwave oven) vibrates water molecules but this one providess enough energy to break the H-O bond, just for it to combust and rebond again (oxidize). The flame then drives a sterling engine that is hydrogen based and the energy change is inefficient, since obivously energy such as heat is lost to the surroundings and as also as light. They need to reveal values concerning input-output ratio.
and from what it sounds like in the news report, they describe as seperating the H from the O2 and then the H burns in the O2. I dont think this is correct (its not electrolysis) and it hasnt explained why salt water is used, instead of pure water (beside the fact that salt water is obviously much cheaper)
from the part 2 video apparently it can just be pure water as well and it is just hydrogen that is burning, meaning that H2O is the product and NaCl is recrystalised at the top of the tube.
Is it safe to drink if collected out of the tail pipe? Can fish live in it? When it evaporates into the air does it regain the particles removed?If the answers are no then we will use up a non-renewable source of energy water will be poison & we will kill all ocean, animal & human life.
From what I understand, it doesn't. But it's not like there is a shortage of free energy inventions, though...I don't think the world will ever be powered by burning water, it makes much more sense to use devices that doesn't burn the most precious substance on Earth.
Interesting. How much input power to the magnetron or whatevever device produces the EM waves to heat the salt water? If a Sterling engine is used to run a turbine, what is the output capacity? You could then calculate the efficiency of the system. I'm not trying to shoot this down - I'd just like to know.
this could possibly be the next hybrid gas/hydrogen (Saltwater)or it sure would help those who own twin or triple engine boats/ships.Get your fuel just drop a hose.
That machine simply produces a changing magnetic field in a certain space. The changing field results an electrical potential difference between points in space which induces a current in a conductor. This is how the bulb lights. For this to be able to generate power efficiently it has to release more energy from the saltwater's bonds than it spends keeping the saltwater in a combustible state
Redesigned I don't believe it but this conversation is pointless. If it never becomes practical we will never see it power a car, if it is practical and can power a car it will never be allowed in public hands.
That makes no sense, you are making it more complicated than it needs to be. All that matters is that there is an ignition within the cylinder. Once the engine is running it should be able to run an alternator to run the device, the waste factor is unimportant if the car runs on water who cares, increase efficiencies later
It's not pointless, you just don't have the fore Thought to see that this device can be redesigned to pull far less energy to produce the same result.
The idea is to ignite a flame in a piston that contains water instead of gasoline. just how much energy do you think it will take per piston per cycle just like a spark plug firing?
We now just cycle back to my previous posts. You have no idea what the energy input will be when this is miniaturized this device, you could say the same it takes now. You have been around long enough to see major advancements in TVs & Monitors. The old consumed large amounts of electricity, the newer flat panel consumes far less yet has the same function, to see images. The newer laptop consumes less. The first pace maker took up an entire wall of electronics
Asking that is like asking how many batteries do you need in your car to run the heater fan, windshield wipers, head lights & all other electronics? good question if nobody invented the alternator.
Battery Turns starter+Gas+engine+running alternator powers all electronics+charges battery.
Same with above radiatin device, Battery(s) turns starter+starts radiation unit+runs engine+runs alternator to run the unit etc.
This looks real to me. Salt makes water conductive and RF creates circulating electrical current--which breaks apart the water molecule. Burn the H2 & O2 to get water again.
The problem is you need a freakin' massive battery to run the RF generator. Since electrolysis of water is not 100% efficient, and while Stirling heat engine is far more efficient than gasoline engine, it's not as good as electric motor--so you'd get more miles by running motor directly off of battery.
FGE said: "There were some mechanics who claimed that they removed the catalytic converter from a car and literally ran another car only from the exhaust..."
True when 1st engine is badly out of tune, e.g. the way they were before '98. Too lean & you get NOx (pollutant) & burn exhaust valves. Too rich & you waste gas & get stinky hydrocarbons (pollutant). However the cat converter lets you to run rich with no stink.
Ox sensor removed need to run rich, so your statement is 10 yrs out of date.
What can be proposed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. If a believed every crackpot theory I ever heard without demanding evidence I'd be very fucked up indeed. Anything is possible, but I won't base my actions on anything I have no reason to believe is probable, much less likely.
Just to shut you guys up, this little thing here involves converting electromagnetic energy into electrical energy. Of course the source of the radio-waves was elctricity in the first place, so this device is redundant and can only be less than 100% efficient.
oh, and so you don't start bitching, the "flame" is in fact a sort of electrical cloud. 8<()
Yeah your right about the oil comapnies. Not to mention the cancer drug companies. They would try to supress this technology because it would put them out of business.
This discovery isn't worth shit. It doesn't generate energy, it wastes it! Here's what happens: Electricity is used to generate radio waves, some of which use up their energy by breaking the bonds of water molecules. The Hydrogen burns, producing water, and releasing the same amount of energy it took to break the bonds. So even if you capture 100% of the heat, and the water intercepts 100% of the radio waves, and your radio wave and electricity generators are 100% efficient, you gain nothing.
And you don't see how the process can be improved on? Doesn't make a fuck how much energy was used - the simple fact that it ignited it what's important. No big deal - this guy is probably already dead or has been bought out.....
No that's not important. Because while I don't know how much energy this uses, I can say that it's not very efficient. Electrolysis, which does the exact same thing, requires much less equipment, and is extremely efficient, which means that it's better. Even then, it's not very useful, really only for certain types of welding. You could use it to run a car, but the ultimate energy source will still be fossil fuels, unless you happen to have access to green energy. Few people do.
I love the quote of "could change the world" but people are always trying to sell these ideas . If they really wanted to change the world they would just throw it up on you tube and tell you how to make one. Im not that into science so i wouldnt know the first thing about this stuff. It just interest me.
I think what happens is that if you yourself spent half of your life inventing something that had the potential to make you and your entire family Trillionares 100 times over then you kind of have a tendency to not want to give it a way for free.
nobody seem to mention his huge power generator, which is feeding the radio device, so nothing special about it, there are many ways to split water in hydrogen and oxygen, by electricity or with a radio wave device shown in this video, so comment about free energy are useless on this topic.
"wont we then burn up all the water? no more water!" - Kwazi6
The simple observation that this process starts and ends with water makes it obvious this is not a free energy source.
What's the source of the energy? Energy is countable, just like money. If you have a wallet with $100 and you pull out $50, would you still have a $100 in the wallet?
Suppose he did make a way to separate water into hydrogen which can burn...
You can receive energy by recombining his waste products into the original water. If he claims to receive energy from reversing that, then he has invented a perpetual motion machine, receiving energy both ways.
hmm.... for u idiots that think glass melts at 1600c ure correct but look closely on most of the flame coming out it doesnt touch the mouth of the test tube they said ***in the flame*** it was 15,000c so if it goes throug the middle dont i think it is way cooler around it????
You can separate water by electrolyses, or with extreme heat. Electrolyses works realy well with salt water, so i think it is electrolyses. There are probily a lot of electrons moving between those plates.
1. No clear substance will withstand said temperatures (glass melts at 1600 Centigrade and Iron at 2800 Centigrade. Articles claim it burns 3000 Centigrade.
2. Hydrogen burns blue in the presence of oxygen, not deep red.
3. Suppose he did create a machine to separate water, it would separate his hand too because his hand is made of water.
Amazing. Just like the people who refused to believe that flight was possible even denying it right in front of their eyes 5 years after the first flight because it does'nt fit into their little box. Instead of denying the existance of what you see why don't you expand that box by studying why the hand does'nt burn (first off no one put a flame to his hand) secondly the glass may not melt in the same way the end of a hydrogen torch won't melt yet it will cut through metal
This man claims to get more energy through heat than he is giving with electricity. It's a violation of the first law: Energy cannot be created nor destroyed.
Essentially:
(H2O) + (electricity) =
(Heat) + (Oxygen) + (Hydrogen).
Since we know we can gain energy by recombining the elements into water, we see that this man's claim is one of a perpetual motion machine. He receives energy both ways.
Go back in time, study theories throughout time. Study how many times science had to re-write science texts. Do you actually believe we are at a point in time where all universal knowledge has been obtained? We have come along way and as we create new machines that alter cells, and alter our environment we are bound to discover things never known before.
I agree I may be skeptical of an true event. But unlike the wright brothers who actually flew, this man only has some red-burning fuel inside a test tube when we know hydrogen burns blue.
Go separate water into hydrogen and burn it, it will be blue, not Red as in this man's demo.
Would be terrific if he did though! He would single handedly revolutionize the law of conservation of energy. More power to him! But he's a quack. He has no revolutionary technology.
The wright brothers did not fly on their first try, at first they appeared to be bumbling idiots attemting the impossible.
The flame here is yellow with red outline
The sun is hydrogen, what color is the flame?
Do a goole video search for ( Hydrogen Burning) it's yellow with red outline. Then type in Burning hydrogen (it's yellow with a red outline) Where did you come up with blue?
Every video on here that you search Hydrogen Burning or Burning hydrogen is yellow in the center with a red ouline, not blue. Also, the Wright Brothers did not fly on the first try, it took many, many falures, if everyone gave up trying after many failures we would not be airborn today.
Hi FreeGlobalEnergy , just curious, maybe you can explain,
I suppose the device that generates the radio waves is working on electricity right? How much electricity is put into it in order to let the flame appear. And, would it be possible to generate that amount of electricity from a turbine powered by that flame? thanks for answering.
I don't know the specs on the machine, it's original design was not to catch water on fire nor was there a concern of how much current it would draw as it was designed to kill cancer cells. Now that this discovery was made it now needs to be completely redesigned in an effort to make it practical. This radio wave might be able to ignite the water in the piston chamber of an engine.
This is something that needs extensive study and not to be blown out of the water by some narrow minded individuals here. The Pace maker originally started out as a machine that covered an entire wall. The first Computer required a warehouse sized room, the first large robots were useless now look at asimo, this will advance and have practical use.
But they all did something, rather than just juggle energy around, losing a little in the process. Just give up. You fucking lose. Hopefully the cancer treatment will work though, seeing as there is no reason to dismiss it out of hand as flying in the face of all the work done in physics in the last 400 years.
Maybe in dumbassia, but trust me, I'm from th same city as this guy, and I've heard all kinds of shit about his cancer treatment since this was posted, and not a fucking thing about his magic electricity machine.
You won't hear anything about any device that will interfere with oil production at $109 per barrel selling 1 barrel per second unless it is a project of the oil company itself that will profit the same as oil & gas
Just like big pharma is suppressing the cancer treatment, right? This would be in science journals if it worked at all, you stupid motherfucker. Why? Because everything in physics written in the last half century would have to be scrapped to account for it. No lobby is powerful enough to suppress something of that magnitude.
Written in science journals,Wrong,you have no clue just how powerful these people are. Originally J.P. Morgan(Large private banker)and Rockefeller(big oil), the Richest most powerful men in the world,created the Federal Reserve corporation in the 20's.Yes the Federal reserve is a Private Corporation. When Government wants money the corporation prints it,then WE have to pay them back the interest. These people have the world in their pocket, they do control what science is presented to the public
The scientific establishment is international, dumbass. Believe it or not, somewhere, there is a reputable journal with no connection to the big scary fed. Plus it's been on fucking Youtube for 7 months. Loose Change took off, and that was almost as big a piece of bullshit as this, with bigger stakes. If this were reputable, it'd be news. It's not, because it's just a local news segment prodiced by imbeciles with no understanding of the subject matter, and propagated by even bigger asshats.
I'm not going to spend hours presenting information to you. You go right ahead thinking that politicians aren't liars and thieves, the president tells no lies, that corporations are honest, that the Mafia never existed, that CIA are good guys, News reporters aren't blocked even fired for reporting the real news, everybody is good, there is no evil... Hey just like Leave It To Beaver, golly gee Beave, your sure gonna get fucked in the ass a lot in your life time for being so naive
Not at all. It's just that many politicians do good work regardless of motive or methods, the current president is a (nearly pathological) liar, many corporations are run by honest people, and many by weasels, the mafia did and does exist, the CIA is too secretive for me to comment, eventually the truth will be heard if it gets into passionate enough hands, most people are good, and most people do evil. It only takes one man to topple a nation, if he can take out the right people.
From the age of 5 to 18 you learn massive quantities of information through a Federalized controlled education system which is a lot like a controlled religion, you become a product that can't think on their own, brain washed as with any religion that when truth is presented it does not calculate into the box you were educated into, only a few intelligent free thinkers break away from this control and begin to see the wheelworks & the people who control & manipulate the masses
Believing assertions without evidence is the opposite of freethought, it's faith. The only box I've been educated into is the one where critical thought is a necessary tool for evaluating reality. And thinking critically tells me that the reason this is the only attention "burning saltwater" will get is because these were the only people who didn't realize that it's just a less efficient alternative to electrolysis, not because a world wide cabal of oil tycoons prevent it from being known.
Oh, shit, Occam's razor - it works, bitch, was a quote, I forgot the quotation marks.
No, of course there is much more to discover. This, however, is rather pedestrian, and anyone with a basic knowledge of physics can see at a glance that it is incapable of generating more usable energy than you already had, unless you can generate radio waves without expending energy. That is impossible to do without a naturally occurring source, which doesn't exist at great enough energy. Hence, this is dumb
This is useful in an existing combustion engine where water is the fuel injected into the cylinder and the spark plug is the sound or radio wave transmitter.
I would imagine that the torque of the engine running the alternator might produce enough electrical current to run the device (just a guess). If a spark plug design won't work then a modification where two plates are installed just outside the cylinder walls should work. for you to cut this down without extensive evaluation is premature
As I said, the water could not possibly absorb all the radiation, much would escape, whereas electrolysis does exactly what this does very efficiently. If the engine produced enough energy to run the radio generator, it would be a perpetual motion machine, because the flame is a chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen producing exactly as much water as you started with. However, you would not be able to use the engine for anything else, that would use all the energy.
OK "stupid idea" So then lets trash it and move on to something else, talk about perpetual motion, this conversation is a perfect example of perpetual conversation, it just keep cycling and never stops
untziggy is right, at least about the car. Even if this "process" was 200% efficent it would still suck compared to just a straight electric car simply because electric motors are 90%+ efficent and internal combustion engines are less then 30%. It really has nothing to do with this process then, the rest of the equation sinks it.
The internal combustion engine is purposely built to be 30% efficient or inefficient, so if you burn tap water which I am guessing is less than 1cent per gal as opposed to gas at $3-4 per gal then I don't see why burning water at 30% efficiency is such a bad idea.
OK, lets erase that the part about purposely designed to get 30%
---------------------
If you burn tap water which I am guessing is less than 1 cent per gal as opposed to gas at $3-4 per gal then I don't see why burning water at 30% efficiency is such a bad idea.
By the way, I don't just pull statements out of thin air. This statement was from a mechanical engineer who designed his own engine, some sort of rotary design I think. He says the 70's engines were more efficient than modern designs. Todays cars & engines are much lighter, the engines are less efficient, if they get better mileage it is only due to the lighter weight. I don't have the means to prove or disprove that statement but I believe it. the vid might be in my favorites
There were some mechanics who claimed that they removed the catalytic converter from a car and literally ran another car only from the exhaust of the first car. I believe this, and I don't believe that in 2008 scientists are too stupid to make a combustion engine burn 99% to 100% of the fuel. It is not in the interest of anyone with oil stocks selling 1 barrel of oil per second at $109 per barrel & rising, that's no conspiracy just the way big business works (and greed)
Well if big oil is responsible for 30% efficient cars, they must have a time machine since the research and work used to predict the efficiency of engines are about 175 years old.
Why would car companies conspire with big oil? If Ford came out with a SUV that got 75 MPG tomorrow, do you think anyone would buy another chevy?
What do you get when you burn water, chemically speaking? Your going to say water so then I musy ask where the energy comes from? Inputs must equal outputs.
Look up Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot on wikipedia or something. He did most his work on steam engines but it applies to any kind of heat engine with cycles.
Reducing the size of something is completly different then making energy from nothing. Electronics will always get smaller, and energy will always balance.
My 200% comment was in regards to heat engines being horribly inefficient, therefore making the process of converting electricity to conbustile gas a bad idea.
Maybe use the money to finish some physics classes first. Why bother distorting the truth, yes he maybe splitting H2O using EM radiation, but how much does it cost to run the machine/microwave oven he is using? It's the old problem, energy input > energy taken out.
medeerbeer 2 months ago
@medeerbeer lol i am totaly with you. What we just saw was the convertion of the energy from one form to the other. electric energy>>converted with losses to EM>>>react with water and ignite it (more losses of energy) >>> and then through the sterling takes back a part of the electric energy he consumed on the start of the story. But hey the ignition of salt water using EM is still interesting and amazing!
ikaros2006 1 month ago
Best of luck to him. Read about his cancer killing machine in PopSci and it was very interesting. Don't see the water being a viable fuel though...
unambitious 7 months ago
@unambitious We didn't see space travel being viable 200 years ago.
EgaoNoGenki 3 months ago
Too bad it takes more energy to split the water that what you back when it burns.
xccmx 9 months ago 2
Wow, great. Now I can practically see idiots throwing microwaves into the ocean to set it on fire. Wait... maybe that's the reason mars is red... OH SH~
SargoDarya 1 year ago
@SargoDarya
1
Think of this. What fuels the sun?
Now consider that we humans live on top of a crust that floats on top of a liquid molten core much like the sun that is always on fire. Inside the ground are all kinds of combustable fuels such as coal, oil etc. We have oceans of water that is capable of being converted to hydrogen. Our scientits are always experimenting. Radio waves bombard almost every part of this earth, microwaves are used to transmit satelite tv...
GlobalAwareness2525 1 year ago
@SargoDarya
2
It's very likely that one day we could accidentally combine the right signals or waves that will ignite the world's oceans and cause a chain reaction that ignites the earths fuels simultaneously to turn earth into a fireball like the sun. It's amazing that with all of the underground ignitable fuels, missile testing, wars etc that this has not happened long ago.
GlobalAwareness2525 1 year ago
@GlobalAwareness2525 Wow, never thought of it that way when actually writing it. Maybe it just didn't happen because the concentration of salt in the water is not enough but seriously this is a good question. With what madvlad666 says actually it would be possible if the water is under electrolysis so if you hold a microwave near the water you should be able to ignite it? Sounds fun.
SargoDarya 1 year ago
This inventor is one perfected humanitarian!
timelakevideo 1 year ago
I have seen this before but I have stumbled upon it again, I am sure it takes more energy to burn than is given off but it is amazing nonetheless.
dragonamt 1 year ago
@dragonamt
Lets expand on that thought. This machine definitely uses more resources to ignite that flame yet the machine was never built to make a clever water candle, it was built to zap cancer cells with no concern over how much electricity it consumes. Like the first television sets consumed enormous amounts of current but just like all electronics the goal is not only to improve quality but to improve efficiency as well. This machine can be made much more efficient & smaller over time.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dragonamt
Another example is to look back at CIA's 1960s computer systems. They required large air conditioned rooms and lots of current was used for their operation. Your cell phone now has approx 6X the processing power of CIA's most powerful computers in the 1960s yet operates on the tiniest of current.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dragonamt
Probably the best example is the original pace maker. This electronic machine took up the entire wall of a hospital room. I forget if it were 60s or 70s but an MD with a vision told his peers that he could make that machine the size of a cigarette pack. They scoffed and laughed at him... but in time he did it. My point is that with improved circuitry devices use less current & even perform better. Now there are printable circuits. Truly amazing.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@FreeGlobalEnergy I never said it wasn't viable, it will take a lot of R&D but it maybe.
dragonamt 1 year ago
@dragonamt
Yes, the reason I think this has incredible potential is because all it is doing is intensifying radio signals to a finite point. I imagine one might use the intensity of a laser to focus the intensity of the radio waves and/or as a transport method of the radio waves. But this will never be allowed to be used within the general masses as long as there is still oil to be drilled then when all tar sands are used up which is about 200yrs from now
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
and just a side note @dzgfdg why should anybody give a shit about letting the earth survive if there are no animals including humans to use it for what it is and all it has to offer. by your logic we should care just as much about all the worthless planets out there that do nothing for us that are uninhabitable just to make sure they survive.
shubitydowap 1 year ago
First off this guy is amazing this is very cool shit. and second of all this could change the all of the pollution and depletion of the earth leaving it to regenerate its losses from the past.
shubitydowap 1 year ago
The only way you can do it is to change their pattern magnetically or electromagnetically. I believe that magnetically is to be exact. There was tests doen over 100 years ago and it showed that magnetic object affect body behavior.
syntax128 2 years ago
You cant just kill cancer sells, it is part of your body. It is the same as to cut of a piece of your organ.
syntax128 2 years ago
A
Actually a European Dr discovered what internal cancer really is. There is a process caused from humans not consuming sufficient alkaline foods. When the body reaches acidosis then exactly like in aquatics fungi grows in the blood & organs. Red blood cells clump like coins, white blood cells become lethargic & can't gobble up fungi or cholesterol. Fungi multiplies rapidly on organs then a skin layer grows around the Fungi. It is that skin layer that Drs biopsy, not what is inside the tumor
BernesePuppies 2 years ago
B
The medical association is working to shut him up because his treatments would destroy the medical industry. he was using an alkaline solution of sodium bicarbonate directly applied to the tumors which shrunk. it's all part of a process of acidosis, scurvy, flesh eating fungi, That's what cancer is.
BernesePuppies 2 years ago
C
Alkaline foods are also high in vit C or anti-oxidants. As long as the body is sufficient with these foods it will never fall into acidosis. If low enough levels are reached for prolonged periods of time acidosis, scurvy, fungal infections (cancer) ravish the body.
Anything that kills the fungi kills the cancerous tumors but it will all repeat again unless the body is brought back to a 7.4 alkaline state then everything reverses back to the state it is supposed to be in.
BernesePuppies 2 years ago
D
Once the body is alkaline then blood oxygen levels increase tremendously and cancer cannot live in an oxygen rich environment, cancer cannot live in an alkaline environment nor can cancer live in an environment rich in anti-oxidants.
If you want to cure cancer just follow the protocol of curing scurvy, it's the same thing except cancer stages are advanced scurvy & requires more intense natural treatments.
BernesePuppies 2 years ago
If it is true it is good. But he will sell his tech to hospitals and there for people who have no money it will be impossible.
syntax128 2 years ago
As are the machines in hospitals worth millions so nothing would change from that aspect but if this machine had a 99% success rate and perhaps a one time treatment vs many with todays chemo is huge loss in repeat business from patients therefore loss in income. Corporations are more interested in the bottom line than to actually heal the world because as long as there are sick people then the Drs get to have a very lavish lifestyle & nobody wants to give that up.
BernesePuppies 2 years ago
How much energy did it take to create this flame...!?!?! I think it can't be very efficient !
aubaine007 2 years ago
It takes more energy to make the flame than it creates. Nothing for free here.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
He is Legend
ActionWaction 2 years ago
I was shocked myself. The dude above said oh right so I suppose this dude will die of some cause or another so I Googled it & sure as shit.
Notice the dude never replied back? Just another notch in the CIA's gun barrel. Or should I say arsenal of dirty tricks. One never knows if I stir up too much attention I could be taken out. I have had black helicopters circle my house but when I run inside for the vid camera they don't come back for an evidence shot. Maybe coincidence but never sure
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
@FreeGlobalEnergy ur an idiot. y would they want to kill this idiot...he created an inefficient way to produce energy, yea maybe they killed him for his stupidity
dzgfdg 1 year ago
@dzgfdg Oh, I don't know, probably because the first pace maker filled the entire wall of a hospital, the first TV's were inefficient energy hogs, today's cell phones surpass the processing power of CIA's most powerful computers in 1960s. If you live long enough you see that everything becomes smaller & more efficient. That device was not built to catch water on fire but intended to be used as hospital treatment equipment. Re-designed to be an engine it can be made smaller & far more efficient.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dzgfdg A lot has been accomplished with lasers, even lasers that bend which has scientists baffled as it seems to defy presently understood laws. Low frequency radio waves could be integrated into a laser as it's transport allowing low energy input within the finely focused beam intensifying output to ignite the water. Our future provides infinite possibilities with the never ending technological advances of clumsy inefficient technologies that exist today. Technological advances never stop.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@FreeGlobalEnergy how bout we just stop using technology and just let mortality rates increase decreasing human populations in turn increasing earths survival
dzgfdg 1 year ago
@dzgfdg Sounds like a good plan until it is your own brother, sister, daughter or son. If it were your own children you would want to do anything necessary to save their life. Humans are heading for a dead end. We can't keep building homes covering the landscape. Slaughter houses operate at full speed. In 1950s my father used a bullet to down the beef dinner, now a rod penetrates the skull, sometimes misses so the cows get cut up alive & dragged through their own feces then we irradiate the meat
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dzgfdg What happens as you age, even if you'd rather die is pain sets in so you try to do anything to stop the pain which means you either seek out natural cures or you take drugs from the MD often times extending your life. It's human nature. Arresting Dr Kavorkian was a bad thing. Like in the 1970s movie Soylent Green we all ought to be allowed to check in to the hospital whenever we feel it is time to die & be euthanized but forcing people to live is very profitable to the Medical Industry
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dzgfdg What you propose will never happen from the standpoint of the citizen, it will not happen from the Corporations & will not happen from the Government who survive off of your taxes, nor will the world abandon technology, it will only continue forward unless a world wide cataclysm occurs & only a handful of people survive will they resort to living like cavemen
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@dzgfdg What is killing us is our appetite for our computers, cars & oil byproducts. The factories that make all the items that surround you pump chemical waste & mercury into the oceans. People can't eat fish anymore without getting mercury build up. Lead & Mercury affect the kidneys which cause hypertension & nerve disorders which are all the diseases like MS etc etc & cancer. You & I sitting at our computers & drive cars all contribute to the problem but we won't stop until we all die.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@FreeGlobalEnergy i like your way of thought...dont worry i will do that last bit
dzgfdg 1 year ago
so when in this video does he get : soot, poisoned or dies of "natural cause 3 weeks later"
123malasutt 2 years ago
John Kanzius Died, Fort Myers, Florida February 18, 2009 (aged 64) of Pneumonia.
Bacterial pneumonia: Inflammation and infection of the lungs & bronchial tubes that occurs when a bacteria or virus gets into the lungs & starts to reproduce.
The CIA is known to use bacterias of all kinds to either take out an individual or spread a plague in a particular country to weaken that nation in preparation to control such nation
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
How about he died because of pneumonia possibly brought on by complications from leukemia?
battlestarvfx 2 years ago
And that is the beauty of CIA tactics as the more obvious would seem to be natural or explainable circumstances. I didnt save the video but CIA sometimes gets in trouble, mostly the CIA get out of trouble by saying information is classified but at 1 point congress was questioning a weapon they had which was presented. This was like a dart gun except at a distance would shoot a disolvable capsule into a person triggering a heart attack, the capsule dissolves & an autopsy would never find it.
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
I recently saw where there is great concern over the understanding of nano technology & how electronically the body can be made to go into disease mode. it was explained that every single cellular interaction functions by sending signals to other parts of the body much like any remote control signal. The ability exists to transmit signals to the human body that stop proper cell function which then brings on any type of desired disease
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
Neat stuff, using metal particles with the EMF beam might be new or recent. The rest of it was done in the late 1800's and early 1900's by Nikola Tesla and suppressed by our gov't. and industry giants. Poor guy stumbled across it and probably paid for it.
ULF (ultra low frequencies) are proven to effect a person's mood, and cause negative physical effects. The U.S. HAARP system is able to target large areas of the globe and bombard it with ULF's. And that's the tip of the HAARP iceburg
ogremeisterdom 2 years ago
It's kind of similar to how depleted uranium weapons will cause the cell to vibrate at an incredibly high rate until nothing functions properly in the body bringing on disease. The CIA since the 60s have endlessly developed better covert methods of killing people. In reality CIA are terrorists, it is they're design function, when first started up they used Nazi's to learn torture techniques. That is all documented fact
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
I remember people's first reaction to the mention of military having electronic weapons, they scoffed, but now you can see the ones they allow us to see on video. Police now using microwaves as a pain weapon in crowd control. The advancement of electronic technology never stops & the military function is to ever increase electronic warfare & they do use the weapons for testing on American citezens.
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
Did u know that the drug companies are allowed to test new & dangerous vaccines on unsuspecting soldiers? This is true & the effects are debilitating as they randomly slip in the test vaccine. America is really not much different than Saddam in slaughtering his own people. The wars are all motivated by corporate profits, that's what vise president Dick Cheney was all about & many others that pull the strings in government. Money, war profiteering & skimming money off the top of programs.
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
The only purpose for the healtcare bill is the elite want more money, their lifestyles were recently crimped & they need a major program to skim more money off of in the same way two trillion $ per year keeps missing from the DOD budget.
The program we get will suck because the money left to run the program after skimming wont be sufficient to have a decent health care system, then we will be convinced to raise taxes again to beef it up. people get killed if they interfere with corporate profits
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
Obviously this guy is from the future.
javatar77 2 years ago
As you mentioned advances that increase output decrease size,but this is unlike a rocket as it needs much innovation before a prototype could even utilize the stored energy aka saltwater at all.This serves to be a great parlor trick at this point in time as non proto-technologies deserve funding Ex. Quasi turbine. Also let's hope he doesn't pursue any use in the medical field as first intended, because brain surgery through ignition of tumors would not seem the best option to say the least !
9Paradigm 2 years ago
Well perhaps at this time it is equivalent to the first discovery of making a fire, who knew it's many uses such as the internal combustion engine. Perhaps it will be a century before this becomes useful but I think this discovery is significant and 1000 yrs from now this event will be historical.
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
Any discovery today no matter how insignificant will be the means of other combined technologies that will be of great value like todays jets cannot be flown if computers were never invented but look at the 1st computer. It was quite stupid & very expensive but centuries of continual advancements the computers capabilities far exceed the human brain. It is important to look at all beginnings of technology, see how it evolved then use imagination to see where things today can go
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
I remember seeing experimental walking robots in the 1980s
They were so awkward, so clumsy I thought, this is stupid, what a waste of time, just put it on wheels but to see walking & running robots today is incredible, the grueling persistence paid off, look at Asimo & all the other walking robots. Now I see that all futuristic robot science fiction movies will be future science fact. Pursuits today that seem stupid will have great significance in the future
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
I bet it takes like 1.21 Jigggawatts to power the RF amplifier to the point that ignittion is achieved to produce .5 kw power. WOW I thought Ethanol was a neato way to waste energy to produce negative energy. Now all you need is a mobile nuclear reactor in your car to produce the exponential amount of power that would be needed to produce the power to spark this FREE energy! why not just eliminate the water-combustion engine and just have a Atomic-Hybrid to simplify as this is more feasable.lol
9Paradigm 2 years ago
LOL. This machine was never designed to catch water on fire, that's like discovering in the 1900s that if you put wheels on rocket that it makes an interesting car but not very fuel efficient.
I'll bet that if scientists put their brains together they could make this far more efficient.
The first pace maker took up an entire wall space of electronics. A doctor with a vision said he could make this the size of a pack of cigarettes.
His peers laughed at him & made fun of him,
and He did it.
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
1917 Nikola Tesla proposed to our gov't ...a " Exploring Beam " that he could make and it would show the exact location and distance of enemy planes and ships. They laughed him out of there. (Thomas Asshole Edison was on that committee). Yes, that means we could have had RADAR before we entered WW1, instead we had to wait another 20 years or so.
ogremeisterdom 2 years ago 2
Oh, WOW. Same thing did Russians in 1897.
syntax128 2 years ago
My point on the pace maker was that if u can imagine how much electricity it took with antiquated electronics filling an entire wall to the now smaller device is far less current.
The first televisions consumed a lot of electricity. Todays tvs u still accomplish the same goal as capturing a transmitted signal to see moving images and far more capabilities using only a fraction of electricity of tvs in the 50s
All electronic devices advance & use less current to operate with the same end result
FreeGlobalEnergy 2 years ago
If we could easily produce 1.21 Jiggawatts of power, couldn't we charge the Flux Capacitor then? lol
Maybe if you could produce that frequency with low power then LASE it, put it through a focusing parabolic lens into the salt water, it might be efficient. Might.
ogremeisterdom 2 years ago
He didn't cure cancer and he didn't create free energy.
tak2mark 2 years ago
I like your channel and your videos very much.
But this story "peep"
We call the "phenomenom" showed in the video a microwave inducted plasma.
An oxyhydrogen flame would burn much faster!!!
Sorry but his is "peep"
An inducted coupled plasma is not a new invention we have one in our lab. We call it ICP-OES.
Please make it clear in the discription. Otherwise your channel will loose credibility.
ty
hansgepunkt 2 years ago
I agree to mister Hans G.
and besides, its not a generation of energy its just a transformation, because if you stop the E-field the reaction stops, so its not a so called "endothermic" reaction (like burning DIESEL in a combustion engine)
NR2323555 2 years ago
thanks,
you are right, apart from your example given. the standard enthalpy of formation is positiv for the combustion of diesel thus it is an exothermic reaction.
hansgepunkt 2 years ago
cure for cancer is vitamin b17 you dumbfucks
MarTin3Z420 2 years ago
1:11
His head-turn is SO bad! xD
I guess it's more of an editing thing, and not his fault, though.
kylep2 2 years ago
ease thats the hho frequenzi
sinegra30 2 years ago
Wow, ok so the amount of energy that is going into the RF wave is many times greater than the energy released by the combustion of the salt water. Of course the news always has to have an edge on everything it reports. Very interesting, but not really useful, that is unless you can somehow market it as entertainment...
Divinorum913 3 years ago
You completely miss the point & significance. This machine was never designed to catch water on fire & no concern went into how much energy was used to run the machine. Anybody that follows technology realizes that everything is miniaturized & energy consumption is reduced. The first pace maker was a machine that took up the space of a 10ft wall. The doctor who said he could design one the size of a cigarette pack was ridiculed. Most people have no vision capabilities
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
I think he nailed "the point". The news and John Kanzius tried to say you could run a car engine on saltwater, but din't tell the enormous gas used to ignite the saltwater. If you go to his website you'll see noone has offered to invest in his discovery. He did discover something, I'll give him that.
chuck4842 3 years ago
@FreeGlobalEnergy I believe that I've seen the point just fine. The fact is that by channeling the energy through an intermediary substance there will always be energy lost without a self-sustaining chemical catalyst that is started by said energy. It's cool, however I think the usefulness of this machine has already been proven more in the realms of medicine than of NRG production. Guy's machine actually does help doctors cure cancer, that's way more cool! Free NRG is 2, but not the place.
Divinorum913 1 year ago
@Divinorum913
I perceive things very differently than when I started this channel such as terms like perpetual or overunity.I don't think anything is perpetual (forever) or overunity but may only give the illusion of being overunity. So it seems that many machines are merely using highly efficient means of stored energy or force, be it magnets or the atom. Now Toshiba sells a mini self contained breeder reactor that will run a small city for 40yrs without refueling.That's an amazing achievement
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@Divinorum913
It could take 100 or 200 yrs for people to realize the importance of this single discovery within the field of transportation or energy production & how it will take many other technologies combined to become very practical. Look back at the first flying machines dreamed up and painted on canvas or drawings, then how many centuries it took for those dreams to actually become a reality, one technological discovery at a time, baby steps.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@Divinorum913
Your concern was energy loss. Major solar panel advances have taken place in the lab presently not available to the consumer. The normal single arrays you see on roof tops now fit in the palm of your hand & produce the same amount of current through advancement in the way solar collects then sun's energy. It's these never ending advancements in solar & nuclear energy that ensures a future where energy is cheap (maybe monetarily free) and abundant
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@Divinorum913
After following energy for many yrs I see where this is going.
Solar panels will be so sensitive they will collect plenty of power from moon & starlight.
Your EV batteries will be the size of laptop batteries & tiny nano solar collectors will keep the batteries constantly full.
There will be no need to burn hydrogen but it might be an alternative fuel for those who feel the need for diversity.
Technological advancements ensures a future where there are no energy shortages.
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
@Divinorum913
That is the future I see that fits my terminology of "free energy"
Once the device is built it feeds off of monetarily free sources of energy such as the sun or earth's own magnetic flow. You still pay to build the device but after that as long as the sun burns bright and the earth spins on it's axis then it is monetarily free energy. That is the path being taken. Smaller, cheaper, more powerful devices
FreeGlobalEnergy 1 year ago
excellent video. more please! We must remove anyone from public office who is culpable in undermining people's ability to obtain these more efficient power sources. Screw patents owned by giant oil corporations. OPEN SOURCE FREE ENERGY NOW!!!
kaduisaui 3 years ago
amazing how gullible people are. It's basic grade school science...the salt water is a conductor, and the RF energy induces an electric current (maxwell's equations, 1851)..causing electrolysis (discovered in 1800)...and the hydrogen is burned (fire, discovered appx 1 million years ago).
Check out other videos posted by this crackpot FreeGlobalEnergy lol!
madvlad666 3 years ago 4
Well sorry guys but i have to say this...
Energy has always been free! Example? You take one potato, you plant it in the ground, and what happens? 10 potatoes come out! - OMG FREE ENERGY! That is correct. Open your eyes guys!
...so this machine could just be the potato that we have to plant... and there are many more like this one.
So if energy is FREE, who the ffff on earth make us pay for it?
Think about that and get creative, so we can have free energy AGAIN.
madddann 3 years ago
The energy is taken from earth with no different from the food you eat. Meaning the earth doesn't gain any weight or lose any at all, because the materials taken from earth is recycled back, meaning if you were to take the energy from the earth, you will only be depleting the earths natural resources, however true free energy is available but hard to obtain, Nikola tesla already gone through it and his invention was lost and stolen by the government.
UAEchemist 2 years ago 2
This device is not using salt water as fuel. It will take energy to produce the electromagnetic radiation. I doubt that this device even puts out the energy than it consumes generating radio waves.
massspectrician 3 years ago
Selective burning of cancer cells... seems like an old idea. However it is still not part of regular cancer treatment. Sounds like less painful treatment. Hope they can progress it.
ritaturner 3 years ago
they should do combustions in space :)
clanOT 3 years ago
What is important is how efficient this is; it sounds to me like his machine generates EMR that (like a microwave oven) vibrates water molecules but this one providess enough energy to break the H-O bond, just for it to combust and rebond again (oxidize). The flame then drives a sterling engine that is hydrogen based and the energy change is inefficient, since obivously energy such as heat is lost to the surroundings and as also as light. They need to reveal values concerning input-output ratio.
clanOT 3 years ago 8
just a thought, surely
NaCl+H2O=H20+Na(+)+Cl(-) e.g. dissolves?
and from what it sounds like in the news report, they describe as seperating the H from the O2 and then the H burns in the O2. I dont think this is correct (its not electrolysis) and it hasnt explained why salt water is used, instead of pure water (beside the fact that salt water is obviously much cheaper)
clanOT 3 years ago
from the part 2 video apparently it can just be pure water as well and it is just hydrogen that is burning, meaning that H2O is the product and NaCl is recrystalised at the top of the tube.
clanOT 3 years ago
So your saying that while the water is in the microwave next to some burning matches the water/hydrogen will ignite?
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Woudldn't using this source of energy destroy the world's water supply?
ChristianDavis629 3 years ago
A:
I wondered the same thing yet nobody has an answer my question.
Simple description:When hydrogen is burnt in a car the emissions is water,or is it?The emission that appears to be water has been chemically altered.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Comment under B: not here
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
B:
Is it safe to drink if collected out of the tail pipe? Can fish live in it? When it evaporates into the air does it regain the particles removed?If the answers are no then we will use up a non-renewable source of energy water will be poison & we will kill all ocean, animal & human life.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
From what I understand, it doesn't. But it's not like there is a shortage of free energy inventions, though...I don't think the world will ever be powered by burning water, it makes much more sense to use devices that doesn't burn the most precious substance on Earth.
ChristianDavis629 3 years ago
Interesting. How much input power to the magnetron or whatevever device produces the EM waves to heat the salt water? If a Sterling engine is used to run a turbine, what is the output capacity? You could then calculate the efficiency of the system. I'm not trying to shoot this down - I'd just like to know.
MarkFromHawaii 3 years ago
sadly, it will never be applied... salt water is freely accessed by anyone... gasprom, pb, shell etc will not get proffit out of it.. so...TOO BAD
Ap0st0l0s86 3 years ago
thanks for sharing this valuable information, love joanna xxx
WHITELIGHTPERSON 3 years ago
this could possibly be the next hybrid gas/hydrogen (Saltwater)or it sure would help those who own twin or triple engine boats/ships.Get your fuel just drop a hose.
trec600 3 years ago
That machine simply produces a changing magnetic field in a certain space. The changing field results an electrical potential difference between points in space which induces a current in a conductor. This is how the bulb lights. For this to be able to generate power efficiently it has to release more energy from the saltwater's bonds than it spends keeping the saltwater in a combustible state
gastro54 3 years ago 2
fantastic... but where is it???
rogelio67 3 years ago
Redesigned I don't believe it but this conversation is pointless. If it never becomes practical we will never see it power a car, if it is practical and can power a car it will never be allowed in public hands.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
That makes no sense, you are making it more complicated than it needs to be. All that matters is that there is an ignition within the cylinder. Once the engine is running it should be able to run an alternator to run the device, the waste factor is unimportant if the car runs on water who cares, increase efficiencies later
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
It's not pointless, you just don't have the fore Thought to see that this device can be redesigned to pull far less energy to produce the same result.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
The idea is to ignite a flame in a piston that contains water instead of gasoline. just how much energy do you think it will take per piston per cycle just like a spark plug firing?
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
We now just cycle back to my previous posts. You have no idea what the energy input will be when this is miniaturized this device, you could say the same it takes now. You have been around long enough to see major advancements in TVs & Monitors. The old consumed large amounts of electricity, the newer flat panel consumes far less yet has the same function, to see images. The newer laptop consumes less. The first pace maker took up an entire wall of electronics
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Asking that is like asking how many batteries do you need in your car to run the heater fan, windshield wipers, head lights & all other electronics? good question if nobody invented the alternator.
Battery Turns starter+Gas+engine+running alternator powers all electronics+charges battery.
Same with above radiatin device, Battery(s) turns starter+starts radiation unit+runs engine+runs alternator to run the unit etc.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Salt water fuel:
This looks real to me. Salt makes water conductive and RF creates circulating electrical current--which breaks apart the water molecule. Burn the H2 & O2 to get water again.
The problem is you need a freakin' massive battery to run the RF generator. Since electrolysis of water is not 100% efficient, and while Stirling heat engine is far more efficient than gasoline engine, it's not as good as electric motor--so you'd get more miles by running motor directly off of battery.
ScottieDM 3 years ago
FGE said: "There were some mechanics who claimed that they removed the catalytic converter from a car and literally ran another car only from the exhaust..."
True when 1st engine is badly out of tune, e.g. the way they were before '98. Too lean & you get NOx (pollutant) & burn exhaust valves. Too rich & you waste gas & get stinky hydrocarbons (pollutant). However the cat converter lets you to run rich with no stink.
Ox sensor removed need to run rich, so your statement is 10 yrs out of date.
ScottieDM 3 years ago
Your locked into a mind set, You are the type that needs to see it to believe it.
By 2018 you will see some very interesting advancements.
By 2028 to 2035 you will make the statement, "I never thought this could be possible".
Print this page out and look at it in 2028 to 2035.
Beyond that point you will then say "Anything is possible"
At present conversation with you a waste of valuable time
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
What can be proposed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. If a believed every crackpot theory I ever heard without demanding evidence I'd be very fucked up indeed. Anything is possible, but I won't base my actions on anything I have no reason to believe is probable, much less likely.
untziggy4 3 years ago
Just to shut you guys up, this little thing here involves converting electromagnetic energy into electrical energy. Of course the source of the radio-waves was elctricity in the first place, so this device is redundant and can only be less than 100% efficient.
oh, and so you don't start bitching, the "flame" is in fact a sort of electrical cloud. 8<()
yapples 3 years ago
Probably the most important dicovery EVER, and the mainstream media isn't saying shit.
I wonder if the oil companies have killed this guy yet?
wonderfulbob 4 years ago
Yeah your right about the oil comapnies. Not to mention the cancer drug companies. They would try to supress this technology because it would put them out of business.
Jenfucius 3 years ago
This discovery would put a lot of greedy bastards out of business. It'd probably save the world's economy at the same time.
wonderfulbob 3 years ago
thats why it will never reach the market. everything like this gets suppressed
spanishaustralian 3 years ago
This discovery isn't worth shit. It doesn't generate energy, it wastes it! Here's what happens: Electricity is used to generate radio waves, some of which use up their energy by breaking the bonds of water molecules. The Hydrogen burns, producing water, and releasing the same amount of energy it took to break the bonds. So even if you capture 100% of the heat, and the water intercepts 100% of the radio waves, and your radio wave and electricity generators are 100% efficient, you gain nothing.
untziggy4 3 years ago
And you don't see how the process can be improved on? Doesn't make a fuck how much energy was used - the simple fact that it ignited it what's important. No big deal - this guy is probably already dead or has been bought out.....
wonderfulbob 3 years ago
No that's not important. Because while I don't know how much energy this uses, I can say that it's not very efficient. Electrolysis, which does the exact same thing, requires much less equipment, and is extremely efficient, which means that it's better. Even then, it's not very useful, really only for certain types of welding. You could use it to run a car, but the ultimate energy source will still be fossil fuels, unless you happen to have access to green energy. Few people do.
untziggy4 3 years ago
So you see no need in trying to research this? Promise me you're not as stupid as you act.
wonderfulbob 3 years ago
I love the quote of "could change the world" but people are always trying to sell these ideas . If they really wanted to change the world they would just throw it up on you tube and tell you how to make one. Im not that into science so i wouldnt know the first thing about this stuff. It just interest me.
shoottrue 4 years ago
I think what happens is that if you yourself spent half of your life inventing something that had the potential to make you and your entire family Trillionares 100 times over then you kind of have a tendency to not want to give it a way for free.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
nobody seem to mention his huge power generator, which is feeding the radio device, so nothing special about it, there are many ways to split water in hydrogen and oxygen, by electricity or with a radio wave device shown in this video, so comment about free energy are useless on this topic.
seedstyler 4 years ago
wont we then burn up all the water? no more water!
kwazi6 4 years ago
"wont we then burn up all the water? no more water!" - Kwazi6
The simple observation that this process starts and ends with water makes it obvious this is not a free energy source.
What's the source of the energy? Energy is countable, just like money. If you have a wallet with $100 and you pull out $50, would you still have a $100 in the wallet?
BugNuggets 3 years ago
LOL! Wut a waste of ur time to reply to my comments! I was super-duper high as a kite when I posted those comments. HAHA!
kwazi6 3 years ago
No, because you never had 'a $100' to begin with, otherwise you couldn't pull out a $50 dollar bill.
Sorry, that's pretty lame...
Sometimes there is more then meets the eye.
whahas 3 years ago
can u pm me what you replied to, i can't find your reply
thinkstrait 3 years ago
Suppose he did make a way to separate water into hydrogen which can burn...
You can receive energy by recombining his waste products into the original water. If he claims to receive energy from reversing that, then he has invented a perpetual motion machine, receiving energy both ways.
maeon3 4 years ago
hmm.... for u idiots that think glass melts at 1600c ure correct but look closely on most of the flame coming out it doesnt touch the mouth of the test tube they said ***in the flame*** it was 15,000c so if it goes throug the middle dont i think it is way cooler around it????
jetle10 4 years ago
You can separate water by electrolyses, or with extreme heat. Electrolyses works realy well with salt water, so i think it is electrolyses. There are probily a lot of electrons moving between those plates.
mudhapper 4 years ago
1. No clear substance will withstand said temperatures (glass melts at 1600 Centigrade and Iron at 2800 Centigrade. Articles claim it burns 3000 Centigrade.
2. Hydrogen burns blue in the presence of oxygen, not deep red.
3. Suppose he did create a machine to separate water, it would separate his hand too because his hand is made of water.
All aboard the fail-boat.
maeon3 4 years ago
Amazing. Just like the people who refused to believe that flight was possible even denying it right in front of their eyes 5 years after the first flight because it does'nt fit into their little box. Instead of denying the existance of what you see why don't you expand that box by studying why the hand does'nt burn (first off no one put a flame to his hand) secondly the glass may not melt in the same way the end of a hydrogen torch won't melt yet it will cut through metal
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
This man claims to get more energy through heat than he is giving with electricity. It's a violation of the first law: Energy cannot be created nor destroyed.
Essentially:
(H2O) + (electricity) =
(Heat) + (Oxygen) + (Hydrogen).
Since we know we can gain energy by recombining the elements into water, we see that this man's claim is one of a perpetual motion machine. He receives energy both ways.
maeon3 4 years ago
Part 1
Go back in time, study theories throughout time. Study how many times science had to re-write science texts. Do you actually believe we are at a point in time where all universal knowledge has been obtained? We have come along way and as we create new machines that alter cells, and alter our environment we are bound to discover things never known before.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
Part 2
It is more beneficial to science to explore the phenomena than to deny it or at least run it through the lab and prove or dis-prove it.
It's OK to say it works but there is no science yet to explain why it works.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
I agree I may be skeptical of an true event. But unlike the wright brothers who actually flew, this man only has some red-burning fuel inside a test tube when we know hydrogen burns blue.
Go separate water into hydrogen and burn it, it will be blue, not Red as in this man's demo.
Would be terrific if he did though! He would single handedly revolutionize the law of conservation of energy. More power to him! But he's a quack. He has no revolutionary technology.
maeon3 4 years ago
The wright brothers did not fly on their first try, at first they appeared to be bumbling idiots attemting the impossible.
The flame here is yellow with red outline
The sun is hydrogen, what color is the flame?
Do a goole video search for ( Hydrogen Burning) it's yellow with red outline. Then type in Burning hydrogen (it's yellow with a red outline) Where did you come up with blue?
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
Every video on here that you search Hydrogen Burning or Burning hydrogen is yellow in the center with a red ouline, not blue. Also, the Wright Brothers did not fly on the first try, it took many, many falures, if everyone gave up trying after many failures we would not be airborn today.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
It would be blue if it was highly pressurized.
kwazi6 4 years ago
Hi FreeGlobalEnergy , just curious, maybe you can explain,
I suppose the device that generates the radio waves is working on electricity right? How much electricity is put into it in order to let the flame appear. And, would it be possible to generate that amount of electricity from a turbine powered by that flame? thanks for answering.
echtonzin 4 years ago
I don't know the specs on the machine, it's original design was not to catch water on fire nor was there a concern of how much current it would draw as it was designed to kill cancer cells. Now that this discovery was made it now needs to be completely redesigned in an effort to make it practical. This radio wave might be able to ignite the water in the piston chamber of an engine.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
This is something that needs extensive study and not to be blown out of the water by some narrow minded individuals here. The Pace maker originally started out as a machine that covered an entire wall. The first Computer required a warehouse sized room, the first large robots were useless now look at asimo, this will advance and have practical use.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
But they all did something, rather than just juggle energy around, losing a little in the process. Just give up. You fucking lose. Hopefully the cancer treatment will work though, seeing as there is no reason to dismiss it out of hand as flying in the face of all the work done in physics in the last 400 years.
untziggy4 3 years ago
The physics you refer to is outdated
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Maybe in dumbassia, but trust me, I'm from th same city as this guy, and I've heard all kinds of shit about his cancer treatment since this was posted, and not a fucking thing about his magic electricity machine.
untziggy4 3 years ago
You won't hear anything about any device that will interfere with oil production at $109 per barrel selling 1 barrel per second unless it is a project of the oil company itself that will profit the same as oil & gas
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Just like big pharma is suppressing the cancer treatment, right? This would be in science journals if it worked at all, you stupid motherfucker. Why? Because everything in physics written in the last half century would have to be scrapped to account for it. No lobby is powerful enough to suppress something of that magnitude.
untziggy4 3 years ago
Written in science journals,Wrong,you have no clue just how powerful these people are. Originally J.P. Morgan(Large private banker)and Rockefeller(big oil), the Richest most powerful men in the world,created the Federal Reserve corporation in the 20's.Yes the Federal reserve is a Private Corporation. When Government wants money the corporation prints it,then WE have to pay them back the interest. These people have the world in their pocket, they do control what science is presented to the public
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
The scientific establishment is international, dumbass. Believe it or not, somewhere, there is a reputable journal with no connection to the big scary fed. Plus it's been on fucking Youtube for 7 months. Loose Change took off, and that was almost as big a piece of bullshit as this, with bigger stakes. If this were reputable, it'd be news. It's not, because it's just a local news segment prodiced by imbeciles with no understanding of the subject matter, and propagated by even bigger asshats.
untziggy4 3 years ago
I'm not going to spend hours presenting information to you. You go right ahead thinking that politicians aren't liars and thieves, the president tells no lies, that corporations are honest, that the Mafia never existed, that CIA are good guys, News reporters aren't blocked even fired for reporting the real news, everybody is good, there is no evil... Hey just like Leave It To Beaver, golly gee Beave, your sure gonna get fucked in the ass a lot in your life time for being so naive
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Not at all. It's just that many politicians do good work regardless of motive or methods, the current president is a (nearly pathological) liar, many corporations are run by honest people, and many by weasels, the mafia did and does exist, the CIA is too secretive for me to comment, eventually the truth will be heard if it gets into passionate enough hands, most people are good, and most people do evil. It only takes one man to topple a nation, if he can take out the right people.
untziggy4 3 years ago
From the age of 5 to 18 you learn massive quantities of information through a Federalized controlled education system which is a lot like a controlled religion, you become a product that can't think on their own, brain washed as with any religion that when truth is presented it does not calculate into the box you were educated into, only a few intelligent free thinkers break away from this control and begin to see the wheelworks & the people who control & manipulate the masses
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Believing assertions without evidence is the opposite of freethought, it's faith. The only box I've been educated into is the one where critical thought is a necessary tool for evaluating reality. And thinking critically tells me that the reason this is the only attention "burning saltwater" will get is because these were the only people who didn't realize that it's just a less efficient alternative to electrolysis, not because a world wide cabal of oil tycoons prevent it from being known.
untziggy4 3 years ago
To untziggy4
Then let's back up and pause for a moment...
You seem to have obtained absolute knowledge of the universe.
According to your attitude in 2008 we have reached our limits, what we see now is all that there is.
Science cannot expand any further, you walk among geniuses...
...
...
So why in the fuck are you wasting your energy in youtube... "Bitch"
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Oh, shit, Occam's razor - it works, bitch, was a quote, I forgot the quotation marks.
No, of course there is much more to discover. This, however, is rather pedestrian, and anyone with a basic knowledge of physics can see at a glance that it is incapable of generating more usable energy than you already had, unless you can generate radio waves without expending energy. That is impossible to do without a naturally occurring source, which doesn't exist at great enough energy. Hence, this is dumb
untziggy4 3 years ago
"Hence, this is dumb"
OK, so why are you still here?
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
See my uppermost response to wonderfulbob.
untziggy4 3 years ago
This is useful in an existing combustion engine where water is the fuel injected into the cylinder and the spark plug is the sound or radio wave transmitter.
I would imagine that the torque of the engine running the alternator might produce enough electrical current to run the device (just a guess). If a spark plug design won't work then a modification where two plates are installed just outside the cylinder walls should work. for you to cut this down without extensive evaluation is premature
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
As I said, the water could not possibly absorb all the radiation, much would escape, whereas electrolysis does exactly what this does very efficiently. If the engine produced enough energy to run the radio generator, it would be a perpetual motion machine, because the flame is a chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen producing exactly as much water as you started with. However, you would not be able to use the engine for anything else, that would use all the energy.
untziggy4 3 years ago
That doesn't matter though, because it requires 100% efficiency, which is impossible. You could run a car on this; it's just a stupid idea.
untziggy4 3 years ago
OK "stupid idea" So then lets trash it and move on to something else, talk about perpetual motion, this conversation is a perfect example of perpetual conversation, it just keep cycling and never stops
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
They call it circular logic .
Kerogas 3 years ago
untziggy is right, at least about the car. Even if this "process" was 200% efficent it would still suck compared to just a straight electric car simply because electric motors are 90%+ efficent and internal combustion engines are less then 30%. It really has nothing to do with this process then, the rest of the equation sinks it.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
The internal combustion engine is purposely built to be 30% efficient or inefficient, so if you burn tap water which I am guessing is less than 1cent per gal as opposed to gas at $3-4 per gal then I don't see why burning water at 30% efficiency is such a bad idea.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
I so wanna respond, but why bother when the only facts you'll accept come from conspiracy theories and fantesy land.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
OK, lets erase that the part about purposely designed to get 30%
---------------------
If you burn tap water which I am guessing is less than 1 cent per gal as opposed to gas at $3-4 per gal then I don't see why burning water at 30% efficiency is such a bad idea.
----------
This is a legitimate statement
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
By the way, I don't just pull statements out of thin air. This statement was from a mechanical engineer who designed his own engine, some sort of rotary design I think. He says the 70's engines were more efficient than modern designs. Todays cars & engines are much lighter, the engines are less efficient, if they get better mileage it is only due to the lighter weight. I don't have the means to prove or disprove that statement but I believe it. the vid might be in my favorites
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
There were some mechanics who claimed that they removed the catalytic converter from a car and literally ran another car only from the exhaust of the first car. I believe this, and I don't believe that in 2008 scientists are too stupid to make a combustion engine burn 99% to 100% of the fuel. It is not in the interest of anyone with oil stocks selling 1 barrel of oil per second at $109 per barrel & rising, that's no conspiracy just the way big business works (and greed)
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
I need to rephrase:
I don't believe that in 2008 scientists are too stupid to make a combustion engine burn 99% to 100% of the fuel without using a catalytic converter
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Well if big oil is responsible for 30% efficient cars, they must have a time machine since the research and work used to predict the efficiency of engines are about 175 years old.
Why would car companies conspire with big oil? If Ford came out with a SUV that got 75 MPG tomorrow, do you think anyone would buy another chevy?
What do you get when you burn water, chemically speaking? Your going to say water so then I musy ask where the energy comes from? Inputs must equal outputs.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
-"the research and work used to predict the efficiency of engines are about 175 years old"-
I never heard of those predictions before, if you have some source I would certainly like to see it.
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
Look up Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot on wikipedia or something. He did most his work on steam engines but it applies to any kind of heat engine with cycles.
Reducing the size of something is completly different then making energy from nothing. Electronics will always get smaller, and energy will always balance.
My 200% comment was in regards to heat engines being horribly inefficient, therefore making the process of converting electricity to conbustile gas a bad idea.
BugNuggets 3 years ago