@CazK88 So don't you and your relative know that spying is dirty job? I would be ashamed to have CIA pupplets in my family. But why don't you hate CIA then? So if CIA is the reason you lost a relative, I suggest you to hate CIA.
Before he died I never knew he was a spy. He always told me he worked in "national security" but national security is broad. He could've been anything from defense to clandestine services. I do not just everything so easily. Do you hate everyone who has made you mad? There's no need to be. What's done is done, and I realize I can't bring him back, but hating something won't do any difference. CIA will still exist. I have to respect the fact he wanted to be a spy.
No, what you're doing is CONFUSING yourself. Nowhere did you see me say I "hate" the USSR. I expressed my opinion in saying I was glad that they collapsed and I left it there. Stop digging. Why am I glad they collapsed? Because it ended the cold conflict of people losing their lives, like my uncle, where we could live in a better and safer world not having to worry about more cities looking like Hiroshima. Neither you or I could be living today if it weren't for the collapse.
Nixon was the only person ever to stand up to this bully in public. The famously "liberal" Khrushchev was the man who ordered the invasion of Hungary in 1956 and had the Berlin Wall built in 1961. The latter was a consequence of the weakness he perceived in JFK, who later made that rather feable and much spinned speech by the Wall he had allowed to come into existence.
Great commenting voice of "Walter Cronkite" (I guess).
BTW, this Nikita Khrushchev recording is from 1959, so 3 years before this person brings the rest of the world in grave danger.
After seeing this tape (and the others), I say, no wonder that such ill tempered person behaves like a total lout, who takes all time for himself, typical!
"The system that will give the people more goods will be the better system, and victorious." Okay wwell, we sure won that one!! We have wayyyyy too much crap.
Consumer products no longer sustain life, friend. They do the opposite: they drain you of life. There is no meaning behind mass production of commodified consumer goods... I cannot agree with Kruschev here... because the US has trumped Russia in terms of providing for their citizens. Now look at America. If that's total victory, I'd rather be the loser in this situation.
Khrushchev was a revisionist, a betrayer of communism. Breshnev was as well, he made "Khrushchevism without Khruschchev", but in another way: While Khrushchev tried to hide his revisionism behind a mask of "liberalism", Breshnev repressed the Soviet people. But the basics of their politics are the same.
did you know that "Krush" started massive housing projects and gave out free apartments to all families? his "economical reforms" were dumb, but what he did do was build heavy industries and factories, giving people jobs
This is not all of it, right? I thought there was a part in which Nixon talks about consumer appliances, and how Nikita talks about how they "focus on things that matter, not fancy things" or something like that, right?
i'm laughing at their convosation, boys and their toys ay? But this is ignorance and extreme tension showing the beggining of the cold war, so why are we laughing?!
"You must not be afraid of ideas." "...The time has passed when ideas scare us." This is a lie. Why did they burn books, imprison peaceful political activists? Why does Russia still murder journalists today? Has socialism ever been spread by some method other than misinformation?
You dont know basic historical facts.When Khrushhev came to power he brought very significant liberalism,allowed many prohibited before authors to be published,etc.He also exposed the crimes of Stalin.He even introduced Coca Cola in USSR.Khrushhev did not personally believe in socialism,but was following the general line of the party.
However after Khrushhev Brezhnev reinstalled lots of totalitarian methods back...
Obviously not,but dont forget who did he changed-stalin himself.He was one of the most liberal secretaries of communist party of USSR,not countring Gorbachev ofcourse
Khrushhev has also greatly improved the quality of life of regular soviet people.People got flats,cars,more choice in consumer goods etc,
However Khrushhev was very aware of economic problems of socialist economy and was very sceptical about future of USSR (in private conversations ofcourse..)
"He was one of the most liberal secretaries of communist party of USSR." Honestly, what is that supposed to mean to anyone? Did common people have more economic freedom? More political freedom? I ask if they were free. The answer, until 1989, was definitively, "No."
-under Khrushhev soviet people gained significantly more economics freedom
-yes,more political freedom as well.All the "dissident" authors got chance to publish (Solzhenitsin,Bulgakov f.e.).More traveling abroad was allowed.Army was reduced in size.Peasants got right to move to cities more freely.Propaganda also got lighter.Stalin f.e. was described as a criminal and bloody dicator,all his crimes were uncovered.
In general under Khrushhev USSR has changed from Mao-like communist state to a "socialism-light" kinda country,like most of the countries in eastern europe.
Also certain level of private enterprising was tolerated etc.From economics side:people got access to cars,flats (although bad,but better than communal hostels!),TVs,refrigerators and other everyday items.
In any case Denacethemenace (above) chooses to forget that in 1945 the Russians managed to kidnap many of the German rocket engineers from Peenemunde who had not gone to the Americans. These men's expertise greatly helped the Russian rocket program in its first ten years.
I have to disagree Sergei Korolev did not have any Germans around him at all!
And he was the head engineer of the Soviet union from 45 to 66 .. It looks like you got your history twisted and that you are one of those who are still not recognizing the greatness and strength of Russia..
Wasn't it nice of the Soviet authorities to release this brilliant engineer from the Gulag where he had spent 6 years! Don't be so proud of the USSR it was a bloody tyranny which oppressed and murdered its own citizens by the millions from 1917 to the 1970s when it became a little more humane.
Kruschev was nothing more than a pig farmer who rose up through Soviet politics through thuggery and brutality. The only good thing he ever did was to denounce Stalin.
Capitalism is not a failure; the USA has abandoned Capitalism. The Nations where a Free Market exists, is where people have escaped the feudalism of dictatorships and government controlled economies.
Greed? The USSR was not Greedy? Their Ambitions were not Greedy?
Capitalism has it's defects; but Communism is an institutionalized slavery-
Don't buy into the "Capitalism is a Failure"; no--the Abandonment of Capitalism is what is causing failure-
@kohprush - the fact that the soviet union failed. obviously the ability of a government to succeed depends almost completely on the willingness of the people to support it. as china now owns the united states, perhaps capitalism isnt the answer we all thought it was, and soviets were a bit too power hungry to make it work.
@kohprush you must be measuring him on some sort of bolshevik scale -- one where shoe-banging = genius -- the u.s.s.r. certainly managed to create a "classless system" alright -- no class at all
No the fundamentalism of Capitalism is still a majority and crux of the world. Even RUSSIA has turned capitalist.
These tough economic times are just a phase of life that we have to get through. It's testing our abilities to work together and use sophisticated minds to solve these problems. We have come along way and one who doesn't understand the world is lost.
More intelligent than Bush or Putin? True, but one might as well describe them as being more intelligent than a house brick.
What we have here is the petty squabbling and boasts of two men as self-interested and vain as the other; their "great debate" over the merits of their respective political ideologies amounts to Nixon mentioning colour TVs and Cadillacs while Khruschev whines that what he says won't be heard in the west (although what that is exactly is never very clear)
Putin May be intelligent, but not necessarily good. The typical Russian is NOT benefiting from Putin's new Plan!!
Only a Group on the inside.
Russia is a vast waste of any industrial innovations; and Putin is simply cashing in on the Few Resources that Russia has to Sell: i.e. Fossil Fuel, Natural Gas, Lumber, Minerals, Potash and Cheap Labor.
He is turning Russia into a Slavic Saudi Arabia-
They have neglected agriculture and their infrastructure.
fake nixon photograph....
SuperBandstand 8 months ago
SOO glad the USSR collapsed! NO more!
CazK88 11 months ago
@CazK88 Did USSR made something bad for you personally?
ShitFromTransASS 11 months ago
@ShitFromTransASS
I lost a relative who was in the national clandestine service and to this day, we still don't know how he died.
CazK88 11 months ago
@CazK88 So don't you and your relative know that spying is dirty job? I would be ashamed to have CIA pupplets in my family. But why don't you hate CIA then? So if CIA is the reason you lost a relative, I suggest you to hate CIA.
ShitFromTransASS 11 months ago
@ShitFromTransASS
Before he died I never knew he was a spy. He always told me he worked in "national security" but national security is broad. He could've been anything from defense to clandestine services. I do not just everything so easily. Do you hate everyone who has made you mad? There's no need to be. What's done is done, and I realize I can't bring him back, but hating something won't do any difference. CIA will still exist. I have to respect the fact he wanted to be a spy.
CazK88 11 months ago
@CazK88
"Hating something won't do any difference"
"SOO glad the USSR collapsed"
-Of course, no hating here, you just brainwashing yourself
ShitFromTransASS 11 months ago
@ShitFromTransASS
No, what you're doing is CONFUSING yourself. Nowhere did you see me say I "hate" the USSR. I expressed my opinion in saying I was glad that they collapsed and I left it there. Stop digging. Why am I glad they collapsed? Because it ended the cold conflict of people losing their lives, like my uncle, where we could live in a better and safer world not having to worry about more cities looking like Hiroshima. Neither you or I could be living today if it weren't for the collapse.
CazK88 11 months ago
Silly boys in a playground.
orchardcottage 1 year ago
Nixon was the only person ever to stand up to this bully in public. The famously "liberal" Khrushchev was the man who ordered the invasion of Hungary in 1956 and had the Berlin Wall built in 1961. The latter was a consequence of the weakness he perceived in JFK, who later made that rather feable and much spinned speech by the Wall he had allowed to come into existence.
stan954 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great commenting voice of "Walter Cronkite" (I guess).
BTW, this Nikita Khrushchev recording is from 1959, so 3 years before this person brings the rest of the world in grave danger.
After seeing this tape (and the others), I say, no wonder that such ill tempered person behaves like a total lout, who takes all time for himself, typical!
Stupid is dangerous!
FlightSense 1 year ago
Comment removed
FlightSense 1 year ago
Khrushchev was a was an amazing diplomat. and to some degree Nixon.
Khrushchev's immortal words will live forever.
NataliyaOS 1 year ago
@NataliyaOS khrushchev is curly from the 3 stooges...
zamboangaVillain 1 year ago
good comment
Rico8458 1 year ago
"The system that will give the people more goods will be the better system, and victorious." Okay wwell, we sure won that one!! We have wayyyyy too much crap.
RJY4356 1 year ago
@RJY4356
Consumer products no longer sustain life, friend. They do the opposite: they drain you of life. There is no meaning behind mass production of commodified consumer goods... I cannot agree with Kruschev here... because the US has trumped Russia in terms of providing for their citizens. Now look at America. If that's total victory, I'd rather be the loser in this situation.
DriedIce 1 year ago
Khrushchev seems like a cool guy
ZangrilloJordan 1 year ago
Khrushchev was a revisionist, a betrayer of communism. Breshnev was as well, he made "Khrushchevism without Khruschchev", but in another way: While Khrushchev tried to hide his revisionism behind a mask of "liberalism", Breshnev repressed the Soviet people. But the basics of their politics are the same.
Sluggard 2 years ago
the main important thing about Khrushev was that he genuinely wanted to improve the quality of life of his people
alexkvaskov 1 year ago
I can't agree. He only wanted to improve the quality of life of himself and his boureaucracy. His "economical reforms" prove that clearly.
PogoDomi 1 year ago
no, you're wrong
did you know that "Krush" started massive housing projects and gave out free apartments to all families? his "economical reforms" were dumb, but what he did do was build heavy industries and factories, giving people jobs
alexkvaskov 1 year ago
This is not all of it, right? I thought there was a part in which Nixon talks about consumer appliances, and how Nikita talks about how they "focus on things that matter, not fancy things" or something like that, right?
milloselmejor 2 years ago
and does khrushchev slap him at th end? it sounds like it!!!
TheVeryLastHippy 2 years ago
At the end he slaps his hand.
milloselmejor 2 years ago
@TheVeryLastHippy He is shaking his hand the whole time, and then when they make the deal, he slaps his hand and smiles.
ArubaMobstas 2 years ago
i'm laughing at their convosation, boys and their toys ay? But this is ignorance and extreme tension showing the beggining of the cold war, so why are we laughing?!
TheVeryLastHippy 2 years ago
Wormtail81 , why USA still intrude in countries and murder people there?
oncelostmain 2 years ago
Without US we wouldn't have any discussions here.
Why do so many people put down America?It´s beyond me.I prefer US to Iran,North Korea,Former Soviet Union,Zimbabwe and Nazi Germany.
Zoomarinful 2 years ago
"The system that will give the people more goods will be the better system".... lol, how ironic.
mackeral0 2 years ago
indeed
Gkw95 2 years ago
"You must not be afraid of ideas." "...The time has passed when ideas scare us." This is a lie. Why did they burn books, imprison peaceful political activists? Why does Russia still murder journalists today? Has socialism ever been spread by some method other than misinformation?
Wormtail81 2 years ago
You dont know basic historical facts.When Khrushhev came to power he brought very significant liberalism,allowed many prohibited before authors to be published,etc.He also exposed the crimes of Stalin.He even introduced Coca Cola in USSR.Khrushhev did not personally believe in socialism,but was following the general line of the party.
However after Khrushhev Brezhnev reinstalled lots of totalitarian methods back...
svigo0 2 years ago
Khrushhev hardly strikes me as a paragon of classical liberalism. That sounds crazy to me.
Wormtail81 2 years ago
Obviously not,but dont forget who did he changed-stalin himself.He was one of the most liberal secretaries of communist party of USSR,not countring Gorbachev ofcourse
Khrushhev has also greatly improved the quality of life of regular soviet people.People got flats,cars,more choice in consumer goods etc,
However Khrushhev was very aware of economic problems of socialist economy and was very sceptical about future of USSR (in private conversations ofcourse..)
svigo0 2 years ago
"He was one of the most liberal secretaries of communist party of USSR." Honestly, what is that supposed to mean to anyone? Did common people have more economic freedom? More political freedom? I ask if they were free. The answer, until 1989, was definitively, "No."
Wormtail81 2 years ago
Yes,all the mentioned
-under Khrushhev soviet people gained significantly more economics freedom
-yes,more political freedom as well.All the "dissident" authors got chance to publish (Solzhenitsin,Bulgakov f.e.).More traveling abroad was allowed.Army was reduced in size.Peasants got right to move to cities more freely.Propaganda also got lighter.Stalin f.e. was described as a criminal and bloody dicator,all his crimes were uncovered.
svigo0 2 years ago
And yet they still had propaganda. That just doesn't do it for me.
Wormtail81 2 years ago
We are talking in relative terms here.Khrushhev was better than Stalin and Brezhnev but he was still a head of totalitarian party and state.
svigo0 2 years ago
In general under Khrushhev USSR has changed from Mao-like communist state to a "socialism-light" kinda country,like most of the countries in eastern europe.
Also certain level of private enterprising was tolerated etc.From economics side:people got access to cars,flats (although bad,but better than communal hostels!),TVs,refrigerators and other everyday items.
svigo0 2 years ago
thank you for taking the time to respond. You are very intelligent and I appreciate learning from people who are learned.
Thank you, again for taking the time.
poitrenaud 2 years ago
In any case Denacethemenace (above) chooses to forget that in 1945 the Russians managed to kidnap many of the German rocket engineers from Peenemunde who had not gone to the Americans. These men's expertise greatly helped the Russian rocket program in its first ten years.
DrZenith 2 years ago
I have to disagree Sergei Korolev did not have any Germans around him at all!
And he was the head engineer of the Soviet union from 45 to 66 .. It looks like you got your history twisted and that you are one of those who are still not recognizing the greatness and strength of Russia..
DeNnaceTheMeNaCE 2 years ago
Khrushchev made a fool of himself.
joe2stones 2 years ago
kool i love all ppl
ROACHLOC 2 years ago
both usa and ussr can only say "Spacibo" or "thank you" to the GERMANS who promoted the entire space programs of both countries-
Danke Shoen, Deutschen Scientists!
poitrenaud 2 years ago
Dumb american .. YOU have to thank NAZIs for space program and rocket engineering..
Our primary scientist/engineer was %100 RUSSIAN ... His name is SERGEI KOROLEV ...
First in space and the most powerfull rockets bitch!!!!
DeNnaceTheMeNaCE 2 years ago
Wasn't it nice of the Soviet authorities to release this brilliant engineer from the Gulag where he had spent 6 years! Don't be so proud of the USSR it was a bloody tyranny which oppressed and murdered its own citizens by the millions from 1917 to the 1970s when it became a little more humane.
DrZenith 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's the Propaganda you've been taught-!
BITCH! You talk like a Nigger
poitrenaud 2 years ago
oh yeah! color tv mother fuckazzzz
gyarb 2 years ago
Neither systems work. That's all I can say.
wikiporno 3 years ago
Kruschev was nothing more than a pig farmer who rose up through Soviet politics through thuggery and brutality. The only good thing he ever did was to denounce Stalin.
kcope001 3 years ago
What a great moment in history!
fuhrerschein2008 3 years ago 3
The Crisis of Capitalism has refuted this system of economics. Is time to change.
kakanutto2 3 years ago
Really, how would you suppose to do so?
bmf1706 3 years ago
The Crisis of Capitalism was augmented by government policies that were socialist such as Fannie and Freddie.
SteelerJeff2009 3 years ago
You are ignorant beyond any sense of the term.
sbennett14 2 years ago
Thanks for the compliment
SteelerJeff2009 2 years ago
Not a problem pal.
sbennett14 2 years ago
Capitalism is not a failure; the USA has abandoned Capitalism. The Nations where a Free Market exists, is where people have escaped the feudalism of dictatorships and government controlled economies.
Greed? The USSR was not Greedy? Their Ambitions were not Greedy?
Capitalism has it's defects; but Communism is an institutionalized slavery-
Don't buy into the "Capitalism is a Failure"; no--the Abandonment of Capitalism is what is causing failure-
poitrenaud 2 years ago 2
Khrushchev was actually quite a Genius politician and an amazing diplomat
kohprush 3 years ago 11
@kohprush He was also an imazing military mind
GagesChannel 1 year ago
@kohprush - the fact that the soviet union failed. obviously the ability of a government to succeed depends almost completely on the willingness of the people to support it. as china now owns the united states, perhaps capitalism isnt the answer we all thought it was, and soviets were a bit too power hungry to make it work.
bradlikeme 1 year ago
@kohprush you must be measuring him on some sort of bolshevik scale -- one where shoe-banging = genius -- the u.s.s.r. certainly managed to create a "classless system" alright -- no class at all
lukafafrenz 1 year ago
@kohprush which is while he was eventually forced to resign. Just AMAZING! GENIUS!
flashfast2000 6 months ago
@flashfast2000 He was forced because of the anit-stalinisim policies. And reluctance to go to war with the West.
Evildragonfirez 3 months ago
Khruschev Let's compete!! Communism vs. Capitalism!
And the winner is: Capitalism since 1991!!
CazK88 3 years ago
or so we thought
iFLAGEDurVideo 3 years ago
No the fundamentalism of Capitalism is still a majority and crux of the world. Even RUSSIA has turned capitalist.
These tough economic times are just a phase of life that we have to get through. It's testing our abilities to work together and use sophisticated minds to solve these problems. We have come along way and one who doesn't understand the world is lost.
CazK88 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kruschev's collectivism reminds me of Obama
yakmouth77 3 years ago
Only someone with very little knowledge about the system of the USSR can write such nonsense.
fuhrerschein2008 3 years ago 2
Nixon's eloquence reminds me of Obama
loverofbeats 3 years ago
I know Nixon was pissed the way Khrushchev took over the conversation.
eazyegee 3 years ago
More intelligent than Bush or Putin? True, but one might as well describe them as being more intelligent than a house brick.
What we have here is the petty squabbling and boasts of two men as self-interested and vain as the other; their "great debate" over the merits of their respective political ideologies amounts to Nixon mentioning colour TVs and Cadillacs while Khruschev whines that what he says won't be heard in the west (although what that is exactly is never very clear)
Depressing
kinkytransvestite 3 years ago
Compare this ´kitchen debate´ with a debate between Bush and Putin...
What a diference!!
Each time, world leaders are becoming less intelligent and more stupid!!!
Francisco81a 3 years ago
if ur indicating Bush is stupid then I perhaps i agree with you, putin on the other hand, far from that.
loverofbeats 3 years ago
Of course! I was meaning Bush all the way..
Btw buddy Putin may be perhaps one of Russia`s most brillant leader in times to come...
Are U from Russki Land??
Francisco81a 3 years ago
yes
loverofbeats 3 years ago
Putin May be intelligent, but not necessarily good. The typical Russian is NOT benefiting from Putin's new Plan!!
Only a Group on the inside.
Russia is a vast waste of any industrial innovations; and Putin is simply cashing in on the Few Resources that Russia has to Sell: i.e. Fossil Fuel, Natural Gas, Lumber, Minerals, Potash and Cheap Labor.
He is turning Russia into a Slavic Saudi Arabia-
They have neglected agriculture and their infrastructure.
Russian Gangster Meatheads
rule-Smart?
poitrenaud 2 years ago 6
agreed
iFLAGEDurVideo 3 years ago
lol at khruschev
Sclorched 3 years ago 3
haha wow i wonder what Nixon was thinking during that
ThemowofChow 3 years ago
Educative
TURKCHEMIST 3 years ago