Added: 1 year ago
From: VentureBeat
Views: 320,703
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (847)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good movie

  • Wait, so what are these actually in-game-graphics, meaning that the acutal graphics in the gameplay itself will look exactly the same as the cutscenes; animation and texture wise. I need a yes or no answer on this one because this is bugging the crap out of me. I need these graphics on my future Wiiu.

  • The reason i'm ready for next gen console's is because they said the production time for a game shortens by 30%

  • actually this is a realtime tech demo running on 3 nvidia gtx 580 cards

  • Haha a cg trailer is jaw dropping? It's like saying OMG watch avatar that's the next generation of games! Yeah well until I see in game footage I'm gunna assume these fucks just blow smoke to make people think they're making huge leaps..I'm sure next gen will be nice but it's not graphics that are the big deal..it's detail and killing bugs in the game..give me an open world fps with bf graphics on steroids no bugs..hookers..bombs..aliens and an adventure and I'll be happy

  • soo many details thats what i love in a game

  • SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!

  • batman 2 comees close to this ish

  • Blah blah.....We made a CG movie with our engine....future games might look like this. Doesn't mean shit. Make a "future game", show it to me. I remember the XNA car crash demo that came out in 2004, 8 years on we still don't have anything close to that level of real-time reactive damage. Still all crumpled bumpers and scratched paintwork.

  • Oh look, Bladerunner 2

  • Epic should use this engine for there New Jazz Jackrabbit and Gears Title

  • wtf this is a cgi

  • This Should Be A Game It Looks Badass

  • Unless this is in game graphics, it's nothing new. I don't care how good cinematics look.

  • Looks pretty good to me

  • skin dosent glow at least mines dont

  • why he smokes so much?

  • if gay ass unreal engine does that then figure out what could crytek or frosbite engine be like in future

  • @Xboxshqip "gay ass unreal engine"?....kid you have no idea.

  • @KronicKillaz dude unreal engine is trash

    it load textures so slow that is not even fun

    even in gears 3 that they polish it as they can still some times textures load like shit

    specialty when u come from a checkpoint stuff like that

    cheap games are made out of unreal engine that's what y experience tells me and trust me i have played a lot of games

  • @Xboxshqip Are you kidding me? It's MEANT to do that. The textures load slower so that more can be in the distance. The programming is untouchable. You can have a mid grade PC kill it at over 60 fps. Best graphics at the performance you get. Crytek and Frostbite are amazing...yes...of course it is. But look at the hardware that you need in order to get slightly better graphics. So its not really the engine that makes those games, its the time put into modeling....

  • @KronicKillaz Your point?

  • @KronicKillaz your wrong, people can model characters with millions of polygons but they cannot be rendered real time due to hardware restrictions but a better engine can help this. Sure you wont be rendering millions of poly's buy a engine that optimizes hardware better helps a lot... unreal engine is shit by the way

  • @spidernatclip Yes, I know that. Thats why we have cutscenes...but obviously the unreal engine is nice because you rarely have cutscenes, and when they are they are done in real-time. I'm saying that those other games put out nice graphics but you need amazing hardware because of the shitty programming in the engine. I have a $600 build and I can run Unreal Games at 60-100fps at 1920x1080. Games like Crysis and Metro like 15-20 because of the shitty programming. FPS-Visual ratio...Unreal rules.

  • @KronicKillaz Metro and Crysis are very hardware dependant, so it needs more than average gaming hardware to play at high res with good fps.

  • My god, I don't care what this is but I want to experience it. I understand it's a tech demo and all but damn! That was exciting. I love you Epic Games and I don't care who knows.

  • I was reading from Google and Microsoft says they will create xbox 720 with 580 GTX or maybe 600 GTX

  • so when do they start showing the graphics

  • I'm ready for my next gen constole.

  • wow i read about this in gameinformer and now ive seen the footage and its amazing ive never ever seen graphics and the texture well pretty much ive never seen a game tht real and it will be mind blowing wen we see tht on the new game consoles. If anyone has more info on this just message me

  • @dynamozack try infinity blade for the iphone. it uses the same engine i think. but of course on a lower level because of the iphone's hardware limitations.

  • I just expect quality

  • the 720 will be like a fairly high-end gaming rig from 2007

  • @brentisverycool More likely it'll be like a current high-end PC.. they pack future tech into consoles at release in order to keep them relevant for 6-7 years.. the GPU used in the 360 was something that wasn't even available for PCs at time of its release. Of course PCs catch up quickly after launch and surpass at a premium price and a lack of game content. Microsoft took a big loss with each console initially though, so the consumer gets huge bang for the buck.

  • some serious processing power needed, amazing clarity and that is a video of a screen.

  • Snatcher reboot anyone?

  • I feel sorry for all the lesser devs that make up the bulk of games. Jobcentre.

  • It will be tough to run this on next-gen consoles cause this took three 580GTX to run

  • @mbsfaridi they never said that it takes 3 580s to run this , they are just runing it on 3 ,

  • @TheBoyChur

    They did check google and they also said that it can be optimized to run on just 1 580 GTX

  • @TheBoyChur

    Watch this video

  • holy shit thats good what engine is it

  • EPIC games are epic 

  • i am strung out on coke today, that orgy was ridiculous

  • This is real-time gameplay from Unreal Engine 3. Thats pretty much all you need to know.

  • What's next? The Holodeck? :O

  • It took 3 $500 graphic cards to render this project in real time. At this rate, the next generation consoles may well be sold for $800.

  • @dinmagic Don't forget that technology is getting cheaper as manufacturers find more cost-effective ways of producing something. A 128GB solid state drive used to cost into the $1000's when they came onto the market. Two years later, that figure is more like $250.

  • unreal engine 3 is for consoles pc fags get da f**k off this vid pc is gameboy to consoles xbox 360 ps3 is the new power FTW !

  • @LebS2CuTe I think you have it the other way around dude. Consoles can't compare to PCs. EVER.

    Consoles suck man. The hardware is limited and can't be upgraded unlike PCs.

    I wish they'd stop making consoles 'coz consoles are the reason why game graphics are limited.

  • @nikodiazderivera yep typical pc troll lmao if ps3 is running off 4year old hardware and it still runs BF3 are tick under pc i wll be very embarrassed to own are pc LoL ps3 have said there next gen console is going to be the next big thing it will be the end for pc in around 2013 2014 consoles have way more money which means much more cash to spend for better technology now go to sleep troll plus ps3/xbox360 were 1st step to a next gen game system & they did very good

  • @LebS2CuTe Sure. Whatever you say. lol

  • @nikodiazderivera haha burn much Lmaooooo

  • @LebS2CuTe Just think about this, what do they use to make games for consoles? PCs. Eat that.

  • Not only do I want to have that hardware in my computer, I also want to see the rest of the story from that clip!

  • why cant hollywood do movies like this. tangled and hop are both cgi abominations.

  • @JamalBond007

    They're not meant to be detailed. Those movies are supposed to be stylized cuteness, and Tangled is supposed to look like the other Disney films. If they wanted to do realism, they could do it.

  • @CanoUearNThis not for long

  • Dam, that's one heavy cigarette.

  • sorry they needed 3 gtx 580s to render this shit

  • Comment removed

  • Yes , that engine isn't even released to public or used in any of games apart from this demo which is private and hopefully MODERATE cards for these types of games will be relased with acceptable price...GTX 600 series i hope!

  • release*

  • @george3dmax yeah but they rendered it and needed 3 GTX 580s. They just needed internet connection and a PC to RELEASE this. sorry but you fail.

  • @Kev23Puckerz Rendered?, or real time?, if real time then yes, it needs 3 cards....but how about making a single card powerful as 3 cards. ..when these kind of graphics release to public, we won't be just buying 3 cards...waste of energy. i hope nvidia and ati hurry up.

  • @george3dmax i think AMD/former ATI has done that with their Radeon 6990

  • screw next gen consoles. PC can already render this shit.

  • @ButaChicken I doubt it

  • @abdo1597413 you doubt it? This is DirectX11 technology in this new showcase of their engine. So while PC can already render DX11, consoles are still DX9 only. This is why PC suffers with crappy console ports that are still DX9. I wish DX11 consoles were already out so we could stay in sync. XBOX 360 is a piece of shit, it came out in 2005. It has only recieved minor improvements since then. Microsoft needs to hurry it up.

  • @ButaChicken except it has, no gaems

  • @ButaChicken With how many FPS?! 15?!

  • @danie2332123 depends on your video card, i believe this demo was run with a couple 580's in SLI. I cant exactly remember tho... but we can all agree that consoles are 5-6 years behind current PC tech, and its ridiculous how they milk the cash cow's without giving users any decent updates.

  • @ButaChicken Right on! I love needing to buy hundreds of dollars of equipment to play games that lag like hell anyway! Isn't it fun to install all of this crap? Screw money! Mom, buy me more games!

  • @ButaChicken wtf ar u shitting about if pc already has those graphics why ar you here then? idiot...

  • I have one gtx 460. and it can run any modern game on high. I WANT TO PLAY GAMES LIKE THIS THOUGH. XD

  • What are the name of this game?

  • The funny thing is that this is only a taste of what is yet to come. If this is a tech demo for Unreal Engine 4 which is still in development I can't what to see what a full on UE4 game will look like. It's funny how quickly graphics advance and yet we still think what's new Looks amazing but in like 10 years or so this should look like crap. :D

  • well this isnt really next gen if you look at the frostbyte 2 engine of BF3

  • Comment removed

  • I was really impressed with the streets and all until I saw him use a blow torch on the chain then I noticed the chain really looks unrealistic..

  • Water impact isn't that impressive , I mean like , the rain just falls onto you ? It should make contact with the body first , then break into drops while the light sparkling through them

  • the hero TEseLman

  • I haven't seen a headshot like that since the original Sin

    game.

  • In REALTIME? I counted 6 texture layers on his face alone, BEFORE the tesselated mesh... What the hell kind of processers are they making nowadays?

  • They should use this engine for the new duke nukem game

  • @zaigex And let's wait more 10 years, right? xD

  • @zaigex no, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO.

    We don't need to wait any f**king longer for the damn game thats had well over 12+ years to surface.

  • Same old fighting violent geek guy stuff. So much technology wasted on so few.

  • @Lisatruck Are you always so arrogant?

  • @desu38

    It isn't being arrogant, it just that he hates today's gaming trend of HAWDCUR GAYMERZ!11111!Oh, and which games follow that trend?Gears of War, God of War, Halo, GTA and everything produced by Rockstar, Killzone, Uncharted,Resistance, and every fucking ''M'' rated games(Except Bioshock, or even Team Forteress 2) that teenagers play even tough they're not mature.

  • @Lisatruck What do you suggest ?

  • I see nothing special.

    I've seen such graphics before, and I'll certainly see such graphics in the future.

    nothing so eye - popping.

  • @Kratos4011 Sure, but is it running realtime?

  • @Jediamoony Yep. It's using three Nvidia GTX 580's on a pc. The features in that demo are already available in the indie version of Unreal Engine 3 (udk).

  • @Kratos4011 An what game looks like this?

    Please, do tell us oh enlightened one who has seen everything.

  • @DecodeAGamer Which game doesn't? they did nothing here.

  • Three GTX 580s??? Thats nothing.... More like one 6990 :p

  • @PabloMHenemann i think its ment to show his strength ya know he through it so ahrd he could feel it sort of thing

  • @rauf107 To the high rated comment above, this is a graphics demo just to show how good the new tech is. This is NOT a game thus there is no "real gameplay".

    I do agree with the essence of your comment. Just dumb to ask for game play to something thats not a game.

  • the man is so cool!!!

  • watch?v=ekDutunw1mk&feature=re­lmfu better game play graphic

  • Wow.Now thats amazing.Cant wait to be playing on the nextGen consoles.

    I never thought it would get better after Nintenndo 64 lol.Its amazing how far video games have come since the 70s.And iam loving every minute of it.Been playing since Pong with 2 paddles ; )

  • nice cutscene...im sure the gameplay graphic does look like in the "back to the future" game...

  • Wow

  • looks like shit when you film it through a calculator

  • oh,my name is shuai! everybody

  • couldnt he just rip the chain of if hes that strong?

  • @corycc3 off*

  • it's good, but MINECRAFT's graphics are better.

  • @MujeebTaj10 minecraft is a tough game to beat graphically. :P

  • When actual gameplay looks that well, then we're getting somewhere.

  • @donsaiditwoud That is actual gameplay.

  • if youre watching this because of the "graphics" to try not to google MINECRAFT

  • @Epsilonic Well kudos to you if you get a hard on watching an animation...as for me i would get excited if I saw GAMEPLAY not w/e the fuck this is

  • This game's engine is so good it's... Unreal.

    TROLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM HEADSHOOOOOOOOT 1:54

  • coming soon to AMD

  • @xXSPARTANXx not funny anymore stfu !

  • Sexy cinematic, but can the gameplay look like this?

  • i need to uh..... i need to change my pants

  • What a waste of a perfectly good cigarette!

  • So unrealistic. No one in the future would waste cigarettes like that, they'd be damn expensive.

  • @PorusHorus nobody would smoke cigarettes period. It's passe. Just look at the 70's. 50% of men smoked. Now it's maybe 25% or less

  • @PorusHorus LOL!

  • @PorusHorus Because it's unreal engine ;))

  • Yeah right, the original Mario Bros. looks way more fun than this.... The action is faster, the enemies are more prevelant AND DEADLY, and the scenery is much more beautiful.

  • Sorry, but cinematics don't mean SHIT to me.... I don't give a fuck about GRAPHICS, I care about GAMEPLAY.

    And 90% of all games, when do we actually give a shit about our characters FACE? We're usually starring at their back anyway when we control them....

    TL:DR= GAMEPLAY trumps graphics any day of the week.

  • @staphinfection Look ... everyone is dreaming of playing with almost real characters just for more fun and you can't deny that the more good graphics it has the merrier

    it's another step to the future bringing dreams closer

  • I will wait for more demos before saying anything.

  • Cinematic Graphics: About as good as they get

    Gameplay Graphics: About as good as the original mario bro's.

  • my eyes literally popped

  • I miss back when video games had "shitty graphics" like the super nintendo and game boy and everyone still played them anyway.

  • @LivinWorstNightmare the games that people liked back then still had good graphics - for their time period. eventually the current graphics will be considered retro too

  • wow! thats amazing! now..... FIX THE SPAWNING!!!!

  • Oh yeah and maybe Epic Games should consider fixing the multiplayer in their games before going on to better graphics...it lags like shit on ALL Unreal powered games.

  • im pretty sure the actual game will not look like this

  • Comment removed

  • @itsmeadrian1234 What actual game? This was a tech demo made purely for demonstration purposes. It's not a game. It's a representation of technology that will be used in FUTURE games.

    Games in the future WILL LOOK far better than this. Games in the not too distant future WILL LOOK LIKE THIS tech demo.

  • @icemanlonewolf not just that but this can lead to something. for the people that thought the characters where cool might want a game like this, if not it will be the first game published on this new technology, and it will bigg sales !!

  • This was a prerecorded cut scene...How does it compare in an ACTUAL GAME?

  • @nonennify Ever it if was the game , it could never run on a console . Maybe PC .

  • @ClubPenguin4Three I think even a NASA super computer would have trouble running this...

  • @nonennify

    Since when has any computer had problems running a UE game? Heck, a 2002 computer can run UT3 on mid graphics settings!

  • My new favorite phrase: "explosion physics"

  • So was this ran on pc?

  • bof...who cares about his skin?, c'mon...

  • so whats the point of cinematic if the game does not offer it at all?

  • meh

  • I think...yes I do believe I just cam. . .Anyone got a towel?

  • imagine how amazing gears of war would be if it ran on this technology

  • Eye popping my ass. Cryengine 3 will destroy this . Maybe even frostbug 3. 

  • @kphantomkk Frostbug 3? never heard of that one..

  • Demos always look good. The UEs are always impressive, though. Cliff and Co. know how to deliver an engine that can provide solid graphics with excellent performance.

    Then there's companies like Crytek that take it a few generations ahead at the cost of performance. Something attained by PCs, but takes several years for consoles to catch up.

  • Makes the PS3 look weak.

  • @FoAmY99 this is gonna be the ps4

  • PHOTOSHOPPED.  FAKE U DUMASSES.

  • Why does a robot need to smoke?

  • what's the point of showing the quality of cinematic.. show the real gameplay.

    so many times i start playing a game cuz of the cinematic and most of the time its 100 times worse.

  • @rauf107 i agree y they put good graphic in the cinematic shit and the game play sucks ass

  • @rauf107 The point is to show off what the engine can do. It's not a trailer for a game dumbass.

  • @rauf107 This is a tech demo not a cinematic. The whole thing was rendered in real time.

  • @rauf107 What's the point of playing a game based on graphics? You're a dumb fuck.

  • @Ryze244 why do u think, game makers keep making better and better graphics? Supply/Demand BITCH!

  • @rauf107 I like how it has 26 thumbs up saying that they want to see gameplay over cinematics, but it's in the unreal engine IE it's running in the game's engine and that would be what gameplay looked like on maxed out settings.

  • @rauf107 This demo would be pointless if it were only a cinematic. The point is that the visuals are being rendered in real time by the gpus through the unreal engine. Its a demo to show the graphical detail that could be present in the next generation console gameplay.

    Check out benchmarking software like Unigine's Heaven if you still don't understand the concept behind this tech demo

  • @rauf107 Thats the gameplay u fucking turd. Same is as Uncharted.... All the cinematic scenes are done with the gameplay engine. The graphics are so fucking good u think its a cinematic... Fucking nub.

  • @rauf107 All these are done in real time which me