He is like the Samuel Beckett of film-making, in that he forces the viewer to come to terms with the fact that they are a viewer and and are incriminated. Beckett forces the reader to recognise the failure of literature, by conronting us with the absolute reality of thought rather than a normal narrative.
He is like the Samuel Beckett of film-making, in that he force the viewer to come to terms with the fact that they are a viewer and and are incriminated. Beckett forces the reader to recognise the failure of literature, by conronting us with the absolute reality of thought rather than a normal narrative.
It is an interesting point that things that are not shown in a film can create a stronger impression than what is shown. If done properly, not showing something activates the imagination of the spectators so that they become actively involved, rather than just passively consuming. CGI misses this: It does all of the imagining, making spectators passive and uninvolved. Good artwork often invites the viewer to actively interpret it and to be involved with it.
@hellohi821 I completely agree with you on this apart from the CGI. When CGI is used properly, as in Take Shelter, it can be used well to describe our inner turmoil. CGI, like 3D just hasn't found its own niche yet.
Is the font Helvetica? Looks very pleasant.
PrivateMinds 3 months ago 3
"That's the human fate: Only on the limits,we can see how far humanity really goes". This is a pretty intelligent phrase too sir Haneke!
emiliankasemi 3 months ago
<3!
dELiLF 5 months ago
what he says about violence is really precious!!
billardprofi34 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He is like the Samuel Beckett of film-making, in that he forces the viewer to come to terms with the fact that they are a viewer and and are incriminated. Beckett forces the reader to recognise the failure of literature, by conronting us with the absolute reality of thought rather than a normal narrative.
ListenToBigFace 9 months ago
He is like the Samuel Beckett of film-making, in that he force the viewer to come to terms with the fact that they are a viewer and and are incriminated. Beckett forces the reader to recognise the failure of literature, by conronting us with the absolute reality of thought rather than a normal narrative.
ListenToBigFace 9 months ago
Probably the best (most intelligent) film maker in the world. At least as far as film as comment on the act of consuming spectacle.
FTIPak2010 9 months ago 3
It is an interesting point that things that are not shown in a film can create a stronger impression than what is shown. If done properly, not showing something activates the imagination of the spectators so that they become actively involved, rather than just passively consuming. CGI misses this: It does all of the imagining, making spectators passive and uninvolved. Good artwork often invites the viewer to actively interpret it and to be involved with it.
hellohi821 9 months ago 7
@hellohi821 I completely agree with you on this apart from the CGI. When CGI is used properly, as in Take Shelter, it can be used well to describe our inner turmoil. CGI, like 3D just hasn't found its own niche yet.
McShakesy 1 month ago 3
I suppose Herr Haneke ought to be the one to tell us what and what not to watch.
Mdriver1981 10 months ago
@Mdriver1981 you can write MISTER haneke, dear driver. )
billardprofi34 7 months ago
@billardprofi34, whatever, shouldn't you be busy annexing Czechoslovakia?
Mdriver1981 7 months ago
Cheers. Pity about the english translation.
Hanemal888 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry teacher, can I leave the room to go pee and watch a gore film?
MartiniandCigarettes 1 year ago
Thank you so much for sharing
RichiBitch 1 year ago 3