I'm not gonna bash you loads because I know from experience that this is... let's just say it's REALLY hard to do. There were some problems and I kinda agree with that dude V V V about the timing and other stuff but there's no way I could do that well! Nice one :D
Umm... about the only... 'impressive' (if you really wish to call it that, even though it's been done before) thing is the multiple windows. Otherwise... it just wasn't good. Lost timing CONSIDERABLY. This is NOT a 4/4 song. Also, louder does not mean instantaneously better. In fact, it detracted from the overall package. I'm not talking volume, I'm saying simple instrument choice -- the fact that you had the same instrument play twice in two windows DID drown out the harmonies, percussion, etc.
I never wanted the volume to be this loud! There is no need to be THAT angry!
Plus I'm still new in using the AMS (This is only my second video). The only reason I had the same notes in both videos is I wanted to sync them up as best I could without guessing.
Next time I'll take what you said into consideration, but you need to nicer when giving constructive criticism.
No, you listen up. I said volume isn't the issue. I said, you butchered the song. It has NOTHING to do with the overall volume, it has to do with the fact that what harmony existed was drowned out, the percussion was wrong, the timing was crap -- it was quite constructive. You're fixated on believing that I'm complaining about the video's volume. I turned down my comp volume... nope, still nothing special.
However, what you said wasn't constructive. Merely pointing out the flaws and not making suggestions on how to make the song better is not constructive.
That's not to say you weren't right. The volume in-balance is the major issue as I see it. Mainly, the cat, which pierces the ears and imo, unnecessary. More emphasis should have been put on the strings, the drums are really minor. Also, I would have liked more cutoffs, especially in the middle.
This has been flagged as spam show
best hes a pirate ever made on mpc
sarahjne 11 months ago
best hap ever made on mpc
sarahjne 11 months ago
I'm not gonna bash you loads because I know from experience that this is... let's just say it's REALLY hard to do. There were some problems and I kinda agree with that dude V V V about the timing and other stuff but there's no way I could do that well! Nice one :D
craZelz 2 years ago
This version of the song is quite old. Take a look at the newer one instead. I'm not too proud (or happy) of this one.
WiisoGilgamesh1104 2 years ago
will do :)
craZelz 2 years ago
Oh no! We're in Davy Jone's Locker!
Enkidu211 2 years ago
Umm... about the only... 'impressive' (if you really wish to call it that, even though it's been done before) thing is the multiple windows. Otherwise... it just wasn't good. Lost timing CONSIDERABLY. This is NOT a 4/4 song. Also, louder does not mean instantaneously better. In fact, it detracted from the overall package. I'm not talking volume, I'm saying simple instrument choice -- the fact that you had the same instrument play twice in two windows DID drown out the harmonies, percussion, etc.
angrytigerP 2 years ago
Listen up, Tiger.
I never wanted the volume to be this loud! There is no need to be THAT angry!
Plus I'm still new in using the AMS (This is only my second video). The only reason I had the same notes in both videos is I wanted to sync them up as best I could without guessing.
Next time I'll take what you said into consideration, but you need to nicer when giving constructive criticism.
Geez...
WiisoGilgamesh1104 2 years ago
No, you listen up. I said volume isn't the issue. I said, you butchered the song. It has NOTHING to do with the overall volume, it has to do with the fact that what harmony existed was drowned out, the percussion was wrong, the timing was crap -- it was quite constructive. You're fixated on believing that I'm complaining about the video's volume. I turned down my comp volume... nope, still nothing special.
Wrong.
angrytigerP 2 years ago
However, what you said wasn't constructive. Merely pointing out the flaws and not making suggestions on how to make the song better is not constructive.
That's not to say you weren't right. The volume in-balance is the major issue as I see it. Mainly, the cat, which pierces the ears and imo, unnecessary. More emphasis should have been put on the strings, the drums are really minor. Also, I would have liked more cutoffs, especially in the middle.
kacelano 2 years ago 3
Let's not start with the false accusations. Let's see here, what nonconstructive things did I say..:
"Lost timing CONSIDERABLY. This is NOT a 4/4 song."
"...the fact that you had the same instrument play twice in two windows DID drown out the harmonies, percussion, etc."
angrytigerP 2 years ago
Wow, clever way to get around the limitations!
Every note sound correct (the percussions are really well done too) and the instrumentation is accurate and sounds awesome.
Only real critism is the cows at the beginning who weren't distinct and staccato enough. Otherwise, you got the articulation almost perfect.
On all the versions that I heard of this song, this is the most accurate in terms of sound and intensity. Excellant work! 5 stars + favorite
Fullnintendo 2 years ago 2