Flooded Kingdoms Of The Last Ice Age Pt 1 of 5

[ericajjful]

great vid you have here

[khijasmith]

you have some great stuff here

[prchecker]

love the video man

[smuggecko]

brilliant video

[jessyjessy4]

interesting video and very informative

[clairebehun]

love the video man

[realistromeo]

Schollars and Universitites dont like to be confronted with TRUTH! it is becoming apparent that the FLOOD happened! and that ancient civilizations existed that we know nothing about! ones that were capable of things beyond our comprehension! History taught in schools are LIES! ignorant disingenuine propped up falsehoods.

Wow at the Japan megaliths! simply awesome!, it's a shame such places are often destroyed before we get to see them in their entirety.

[Misstorys]

What a stupid German diver, anyone can see it is a man made structure.

[Izorpo]

what I would really want to know is who is responsible for the background music

[tt247jer]

Yonaguni sights are NOT in HISTORICAL Japan... This show is akin to digging up Native American stuff and saying white people made it... Taiwan is one of many RYUKYU ISLANDS... It's not chinese or japanese historically!... How can this show try to link stuff in Honshu with stuff near Taiwan? so dumb

[rascalz819]

@tt247jer Because 10,000 years ago Taiwan China and Japan were all connected, maybe if you listened better you would feel less confused.

[PICLex]

Oh no it's Graham Hancock, that guy that makes shit up and calls it fact :(

[rascalz819]

@PICLex hi troll



[doncarlsanders]

perhaps it is a submerged guarry?

[lucy9359]

what all these under water civilazations prove is there was a flood which took place they are all over the world and the sea shores of all these Islands have them....there are pyramids all over the world as well...there is much proof that there was worldwide civilazation....this also proves that the climate was warmer all over the world including green land, russia and canada....and that the arctic ocean is a newer body of water the result of run off...formerly these 3 countries were part of one

[yvonne43yhra]

you are right. The positive thing is that it is savely hidden... the end of this organisation is near so...

And yes, there were many civilizations on earth - people have no idea how many and they will be found in due time, at the right time.

[TurbotortoiseStickle]

This really puts a dent in that notion that civilization began only 10,000 years ago. LOL

[Yoshomika]

the catholic church spent over 1500 years destroying the history of the earth to further there claim of one true god inorder to have social control during a time of divided kingdoms what did every modern civilization have for the last 1700 years a church . try checking the catacombs of the vatican i bet youll find a vast wealth of hidden workd history.

[Misstorys]

@Yoshomika Yep and they even distorted and made up things which are in the bible. The bible is in that sense a big fraud !

[4SCARECROWS]

Need to take in to consideration that places were built when the sea levels were lower. History shows that most civilizations started along bodies of water like coastlines and rivers. The evidence shows that sea levels were 300 feet lower than today up to over 10,00 years ago. It's reasonable to assume that settlements were made at the areas now covered by the sea. By that it's also reasonable to assume that people could have exploited the natural formations of yanaguni for man made reasons.

[shitonMOHAMMAD]

@4SCARECROWS

that rings true even today, look at the major cities of the world, all located around major waterways

[Masta420]

"Proof is relative" - the Dwarka site was discovered half a decade ago and the mainstream community said then it couldn't be, you need carbon dating to verify the claim it's an ancient city.

So a piece of wood was found and carbon dated to roughly 9,500 years ago, at which point the mainstream said it was only proof of the age of the sediment the sample was taken from.

They ask for evidence and when provided dismiss it outright due to their prior belief's. Never mind the other artifacts.

[Masta420]

Credible(and skeptical) geologists have admitted it's possibly not naturally made, or a combination of natural and man made. Proof is relative.

It is widely accepted now that there has been significant rises of sea level(300 or more feet) within human history(over 120,000 years) and to decide human history is settled without looking at the massive areas of land that would have been swallowed by the oceans for traces of civilization is plain and simply stupid.

Serious investigation is needed.

[Masta420]

Just to explain - Hancock's theory of end of the Ice Age flooding is not accepted so scientists tried to explain the Cuban site based on the crust moving out to sea due to volcanic activity. Unfortunately the most liberal measurements of that movement dictate that in order for that city to be where it is today it must have started out on land over 50,000 years ago.

Rather than properly investigate an existing theory that makes sense they just complicated things further trying to dismiss it.

[lar5220]

@Masta420 this is a old show the have proven since then that the road in Bahamas

and this are not man made

[Masta420]

@lar5220 There was a story about the Japanese sites on 'Ancient Discoveries' last night on History Television. They didn't seem to think the site was proven to be natural, nor the other 2 sites nearby. Guess you must have some proof they don't have access too...

[lar5220]

@Masta420@Masta420 yes I do i no the deference between abstract table rock formations and man made structure those rocks are all in one peace they are not blocks that were put together like that

[lar5220]

@Masta420@Masta420 yes I do i no the deference between abstract table rock formations and man made structure

[lar5220]

@Masta420@ yes I do i no the deference between abstract table rock formations and man made structure 

[lar5220]

@Masta420 these are just table rocks there are rocks like this near were i live which you can see at low tied it not man made

[Masta420]

Also, regardless of the controversy over Japanese or Indian sites we do know that the city off the coast of Cuba is real, or at least even the most dogmatic conventional scientists admit it's unlikely the features seen are natural.

Conventional science has only managed to complicate things further by trying to prove it can't be 12,000 years old as speculated and it ended up putting forth simulations that estimate it's age at 50,000 years instead based on volcanic activity in the region. ROFL.

[OnewingedAngel69]

this guys fuckin loony.

[Masta420]

@OnewingedAngel69 So was Einstein and we still base most of our interpretations of the world on his lunacy. Thank god more and more scientists are waking up to that fact and doing away with relativity, but not enough.

A man who puts together an insane theory using abstract math is a genius, but a man who bases his theory on physical evidence that anyone with gear could see for themselves quite easily is a "loon"?

I think that pretty nicely sums up the upside down world we inhabit today.

[lar5220]

there not man made

[Masta420]

@lar5220 So you've dove down and looked at them and explored them to conclude this? Or did the archeologists who looked at a couple of photos and sonar images and said they were fake without ever visiting the sites themselves tell you this?

Or did God tell you?

At least Mr Wolf actually went to the sites himself to look at them, though his "explanations" of natural forces creating perfect 90 degree angles and stairs are pitiful at best. But he did admit some were surely not naturally made.

[lar5220]

@Masta420@Masta420 the are not man made that type of rock breaks off in layers that look like smooth angles when covered with see life but if you uncover the sea life weeds and such you would see that the rock surface is not smooth at all also the human mind likes to form imposes that are not really there like clouds that look like dragons

[Masta420]

@lar5220 Water doesn't create perfectly square stones, it can create certain "step" like features in Basalt but in Japan the rock is Siltstone which is not known for those formations. And even basalt doesn't get squared off by natural forces, smoothed down yes but not in a square.

And nobody who proposes as you do has been able to explain where all the rock that supposedly "broke off" disappeared too, as there is barely any debris around the area where it should be under that theory.

[lar5220]

@Masta420 current erosion would wash away the rock there is a rock near my home which looks like George Washington formed naturally there are flat stones in the Bahamas that look like a road that formed naturally it is what it is

[Masta420]

@lar5220 That road in the Bahamas is the Billimi Road(not sure about spelling) and according to the local people granite was removed from the site in the early 1900's which covered the "road" and was not natural, and the only reason we have to believe the locals are lying is that conventional science says it not possible.

But we do know the Cuban site is legit unless nature learned how to chisel inscriptions into stone, and one site kills the existing theory as well as 50 sites do.

[lar5220]

@Masta420 they are made of sand stone and it not man made just like this was not man made

[benbernanke]

WOW

[oceanbound222]

WOW

[lahore2vancouver]

WOW

[avatarmarduk]

Excellent!!!

[KCwellard]

This is awesome. (y)