I put it at around 3.5 second gap between the old man and the biker, from the point the driver turned into the bikers' lane.
Personally, I don't think the biker would of been travelling that fast to have hit him like that, and yes, old people should be re-tested, each year, after a certain age.
Carelessness causes fatalities, I do hope the biker was ok.
i had a good feeling it was an old person driving the car....ur right the biker shouldve seen it comin but on the other hand the driver was a huge idiot and was in a hurry to get in the turnin lane but went really slow gettin there....add me on twitter @turboe1989
Yeah, the only problem is they do have licenses and they do drive, and yes they will violate your right of way, make random crazy lane changes like depicted in the video above, make u-turns at whim, etc. The possibilities are endless, all I am saying is on two wheels you should be aware and ready for all this $hit. I a not saying that driver is good or bad cause every driver I have seen on two wheels as AFAIK is out to kill me for the most part. Just be aware this happens like everyday.
you fucking fucks fucking jewish muslim faggots who talk shit,obviously it wasn't bikers foult so shut the Fuck up you low life retard piece of shit cus if that happened to me Id be jamping on the old fuck head that long untill he never fucking think again to get on road!!!
I love the brainless retards at the bus stop just casually watching. Dude just rear ended a car flew 20 feet and fucked himself up. No biggie apparently
@cascist I agree that's some messed up $hit, that one dude just casually looks then glances away. No help-damn that's cold, but you would be surprised that happens everywhere.
@sustantivo1espritu Bikes are vulnerable yes, hit anything you will lose, yes. So I ride like everyone is out to kill me. And a healthy level of paranoia is preferable if not desirable for riding these streets. I don't make assumptions about drivers, nor do I trust them-they will violate your right of way, blow red stop lights, turn left in front of you, make random u turns, don't stop at stop signs, rear end you, etc. Do whatever it takes to stay alive and avoid them on two wheels.
@MrUrnameis Spot on buddy, i ride the same as you. and although the car in the video did an incredibly stupid manouvre, the biker should have seen it happenning and acted accordingly. Too many bikers ride a bit too fast to react to avoidable collisions. Always assume that the vehicle in front is being driven by a partially sighted moron who has a tendency to fool you into a false sense of security before trying to surprise you with an idiotic move. Ride safe dude!!!
@MrCriticOfAll Anyone that's ridden long enough to be alive and still typing responses on Youtube knows that people in cars are unpredictable; therefore, if you are on two wheels adjust speeds for that element of surprise from the cagers, not saying it will help, but it's better than just flying straight into the rear end of a car or at least try to dodge that car by scanning the road ahead for those dangers. I expect that $hit every day I ride- people do crazy $hit with cars.
honestly it was a retarded move by the person in the car to slooowwwlllyy switch 3 lanes on a highway, but it looks like the biker could have reacted to that way faster if he had been looking ahead. if i'm speeding on the highway (which i usually am) i'm always looking 10 seconds ahead. had I seen this car do this maneuver i would have instantly slowed and swerve into the lane he had came from.
I would sue the crap out of the moron in the car. You don't make a right hand turn from 3 lanes over. Since it is on tape. I am sure this will cost him good.
@slowmotion4x4 you can make a right hand turn from 3 lanes over if you do it quick like your supposed to and you have enough time to do it, serious wtf driving here, no person in their right mind changes lanes at that speed on a busy highway, i would have stripped them of their licence immediately and ordered them off the road for good. That is of course they arent in jail already for reckless endangerment.
I see the car was moving slowly, but again, it's still the bikes fault and here's why. Had the car moved quickly into the path of the bike, with little room, it would be the cars fault. However there was ample time for the biker to slow down, HAD he been looking ahead at all times, and NOT speeding. Yes, I think the bike rider was likely distracted and looking elsewhere, then when he looked back, suddenly it was too late.
2, bikes can stop much faster than cars can, and can go from 50mph-0 in 1.7 seconds. Add .75 sec for reaction time for total of 2.45sec. From point car enters lane until impact, 3 seconds elapses, however bike is still going the same speed as other cars around him and is not even close to zero or stopped. Showing he was very late to react, and also possibly was speeding at a much higher speed. So it's not like it's all the cars part, if any at all.
@eatingcatshit i dont find it the biker fault.. i mean.. the car changes lane so quickly without checking.. and the biker did try to brake by he did a stoppie.. and how is he going to stop in time with that speed..
@volatilefists, so not only would you be an asshole for inattentive driving, but then after you plowed into him, you'd start a fight? Hopefully you lose your license. People like you don't deserve to be on the road.
@StCubathegreat Regardless of what you call the car driver if you are on two wheels and you let a driver like that do that to you, and you survive you are lucky, but if you die it doesn't matter whether the driver is stupid or a genius, you are the one riding the two wheels take initiative to avoid that car. Most cagers don't see us, hear us, or care that we are on two wheels, and they will gladly take you out with their automobiles if you let them. Granted some stuff is unavoidable but come on.
@MrUrnameis ??? I'm not really sure why you wrote this as a reply. Are you saying that people who drive like this SHOULD be allowed to continue putting everyone's lives in danger with their stupidity and lack of thinking? I know that every time I go out on my bike I'm in a lot more danger than someone in a car, and I accept that. It's people who drive like this that make it more dangerous then it should be. I was saying that people who drive like that shouldn't have a licence. That's all.
@StCubathegreat I am sorry but were I ride this is like an every day thing. So I just naturally expect this $hit.
From people with valid driving licenses blowing stop signs, not stopping at all, running red lights, deciding to make random illegal u-turns, or left turns in front of motorcycles, or backing out of parking lots without looking back to check for traffic or motorcyclists, you just either adapt to the environment on two wheels or give up riding.
@StCubathegreat Oh on a side note I do believe the driving license tests and motorcycle license tests could be better. Sometimes I just think they hand out those driving license to people. There are way too many crazy drivers out there+compound that with cellphone technology (texting) to help keep a driver distracted and we have a recipe for disaster and when was the last time anyone used the serpentine circle maneuver, beside to get your license.
well as a biker we must keep our vision far ahead to anticipate. and there's plenty of room to countersteer to left rather than braking and waiting to crash. after all, there's no car nearby on the left lane so its safe and relatively an easy task. but then again, the car was the one responsible the most :)
If the car driver wanted to turn off the road then he should have already been in the right lane where its safer n which case the biker would have seen the car and there wouldnt have been an accident...
you all are arguing if the blinker is on or off.... a on blinker does not automaticaly give u right to switch multiple lanes like that.... u first must check if u are clear to do that maneuver.
@FeelingLOL You can clearly see his blinker on. In my opinion the bike was going too fast. He had ample opportunity to avoid the car. He also locked up the front wheel. The car was goimng too slow for the passing/fast lane though.
He braked too hard on the front brakes. He starts flipping even before his front tire hit the car. Ofcourse he would flipped anyhow but braking on both the brakes would have certainly made the impact smaller.
And look at the idiot car driver, wandering as if he is just arrived at 7/11.
@PIAvevo WRONG! On streets like this/highway it's illegal to slow to almost zero and then immediately cross 3-4 lanes. You MUST do it gradually and in a manner that does not endanger other commuters
@PIAvevo its the car's drivers fault. when you change lanes, you MUST check if someone is passing you. I'd kill a person who does it to make sure he never comes back on the road.
i would have done something different because i practice defensive driving and i use defensive driving. I don't mash on my brakes and hope i stop it in time because 80% of the time you wont. What i do in situations like this is look around and swerve to avoid an accident. Dont tell me that u cant do something like that quick enough because ive done it multiple times on my bike, motorcycle and even more often in my tiny ass miata. This was one of those situations u could have easily avoided.
I just love how those idiots on the side just stand there and act like nothing happened when they should've went over and checked on his condition and call an ambulance. Hate people who act like that.
Perhaps the car had a problem and was pulling to the curb (it is an old car called Warszawa, last yr of production 1973). The motorcyclist was behind the car, he ran into the car, not the other way around. Looking ahead is the basic safety principle of driving.Obviously, the rider didn't notice the old car pulling over in time. Even if it was the Warszawa driver's fault the motorcyclist could probably avoid the incident if he looked ahead far enough.
This angers me, I will go to sleep thinking about this, probably think about it again tomorrow, the biker made no mistake but lost his bike and probably hurt himself, this is my worst nightmare.
Motorcyclist did make a mistake. He didn't look far enough to spot a slow moving car across the lanes. He was riding too fast for his field of vision. You may think the rider is blameless but the accident could have been avoided.
I understand your point. I agree that the car was at fault...but being right and hurt (or dead) is just as stupid and reckless as the moronic move the car's driver made. Consider: at 100km/h rider travels approx 28 m/sec. The car takes roughly 3.7 sec to complete its boneheaded move. In 3.7 sec the rider travelled 103.6 meters, plenty of distance to stop or at least slow down the bike to make an evasive maneuver. He did not scan far enough. Tunnel vision kills !!!!
the turn signal is to change one lane not 1 millions especially when not checking...it is definetaly granpa's fault but the biker shouldn't be going that fast on the right lane...
the car was practically stopped in the left lane on a busy road and tried pulling off to the right crossing highway speed traffic n he takes his sweet ass time, drivers fault
@vangel the bike was traveling at the same speed as the other cars in the video... The moron crossing multiple lanes of traffic and is way under the speed is clearly not at fault.
really if anyone has an arguments based to time stopping time distance as he can measure it or any other argument i whuld like to discuss. noone has answered my arguments about stopping time and if there was time to avoid this. of course there was time. almost 3 seconds IF (i say again) IF the bike was going 60mph. its obvious he didnt. we see the brake lights on when the bike enters the camera. so he was braking and still didnt avoid this. he had 80 meters and more than 2,5 seconds and yet...
check a site . google sport bikes stopping times and choose 209-motorcycle safety site. there you will find the answers you seek on how stupid this biker was. and how wrong everyone is trying to defend this badass driver who broke the innocent man's car.
@VangelisZl your an idiot for thinking he is "innocent". The car driver had no signal switching lanes AND he switched 2 lanes at once AND without obviously doing proper checks over his shoulder otherwise he would have seen the bike! its common sense you smartass
@PouriaLDN again a pathetic response to my arguments. the bike had more the 80 meters and 2,5 seconds to react. there were no obstacles. the car performes a pull over=reduced speed with turning signal ON. he crossed on lane and then entered the far right lane which is for such reasons NOT for traffic. the bike was going too fast. also bad choice of place to be. if you dont have a serious argument please dont humiliate your self with pathetic excuses like he didnt check.
@PouriaLDN maybe there is a reason why this video is called CRAZY motorcycle crash on highway? common sense my ass pathetic looser. do you have arguments based on physics time capabilities of the bike? do you know that the far right lane is used to enter or exit or pull over?? didnt you know that the far right lane is not for speeding as if you were at the far left? where is your common sense pathetic idiot? if you read my older posts i clearly justify why its the bike's fault. morron
@VangelisZl LOL u make me laugh, read you comment see if you understand wtf your talking about. CRAZY motorcycle crash means its a crazy a crash with a bike involved you retarded cunt! they cars speed is TOO low even for the far lane, also watch video carefully with your retarded vision and you can see the bike is going same speed as other cars. Common sense is for what ever reason you need to get into the hard-shoulder it should be done safely by switching lanes one by one. ur funny doe still!
@PouriaLDN this is just your opinion. doesnt mean its the correct one. you are pathetic assuming your judgement is beyond debate. the car pulled over so the speed naturally is low. he has the right to pull over unless you forbid him to do so. if my retardes vision is correct the bike enters the camera with brake lights on. so he was braking so if he goes then with the same speed as others it means he was going faster before! common sense remember morron? do you know physics? read my other posts
@PouriaLDN and if you dont agree with my physics just post an argument. dont just say your opinion. i'm beyond this. i offer you an argument with numbers based on physics. can you respond to that? the bike had 80 meters distance or more and at least 2,5 seconds to react. its not the car's speed to blaim since if the bike was going with legal speed he could have stoped or at least avoided the crash. stop accusing the car like old bitches. start thinking that maybe its the bikes fault 100%!
noone is man enought to to get over with his ego and blaim the bike which was going too fast. pathetic especially its so sad to see bikers trying to defend such a mistake here. i feel sorry for you bikers..
@uglytruth1 you must understand that the time the car made his choice the bike was at least 3 seconds away. is this a 60 mph road? lets say it is. 60mph=96,56Km/h. so 96.560m/3600s=26.82m/s! the bike had 3 seconds to readh the car. SO 3*26.82m=80,46m! MMM yes the car made the right choice. the bike was way to far! he has the right to pull over WITH signal ON. the biker had space and time to react. unless he didnt pay attention. the choice to be at the far right didnt do him any good.
@maxtolan I'm right. Plainer and simpler! :p i gave numbers. anyone against physics? please give me your opinion on how far the bike was.. i said around 80m! anyone else?
@VangelisZl Who care's about your numbers. The car essentially made a right turn from the center lane with traffic moving at speed in the right lane. He failed to properly check for traffic and turned in front of other vehicles. The car was also traveling at unsafely slow speeds without hazard lights on. Lastly, he changed more than one lane at once. The only thing the car did right was use his turn signals. However, that doesn't give the car a free pass to make turns in front of other vehicles
@maxtolan obviously you think everyone on the road is a robot making a billion calculations /sec. the bike was too far. 80m the car driver obiviously thought he had time to perform the pull over. he crossed a lane and at the end of the manouver the bike hit him. the bike didnt even try to avoid him
he applied the brakes way too late. this concludes to the fact that he was going too fast at the right lane where vehicles have the right to pull over.
@maxtolan My point is that the bike was at the wrong place. too right for going with 60mph. the reaction of the biker was pathetic. there was nothing blocking the view of the biker. the car made a steady carefull manouver to pull over. its his right to do so. pulling over is done with reduced speed since you aim to stop. the car crossed one lane. the far right is the extra not for traffic lane. i think a bus may stop a few meters ferther. so only one lane crossed
@VangelisZl I agree that the car probably thought he had time to perform the pull over. However, he was incorrect in that calculation. You can't tell whether or not the bike tried to avoid the car from this angle. You can't see what he did prior to entering the camera's field of view.
I hope that you don't live in the United States. It's scary to know that I have to share the roads with people like you. That's why I wear all my gear when I ride.
@maxtolan bikes like this can come to a full halt while going 60mph in under 3 seconds using only 126 feet distance. 126ft=38,4 meters. if he applied the brakes he would have reduced the speed to perform a safe pass on the left. obviously you must wear all the gear if you think there is nothing wrong with this biker. maybe there is a reason why the video is posted. crazy motorcycle...:P dont worry im european.
@uglytruth1 LOL NO if another car hit the white car. it would be the other car's fault. what you can not understand is that the white car took all precautions had signals on. has the right to pull over. and that the following vehicles MUST choose the correct speed and distance from the vehicles in front of them. its now clear that you think that i have something against bikes. i dont. all this time you try to defend bikes. hillarious. you dont see the point here. typical retard biker! LOL
AGAIN until its percivable from the retard biker riders. the bike had no obstacles in front of it hiding the movement of the white car. the white car had the turning signal on. he has the right since NOONE is at his right to manouver and pull over. the next second the bike crashes on him. SO. the bike was an amateur. he was going to fast at the far right lane (illegal). There is no excuse. the speed of the bike and the choice of positiion is what caused this crash.BIKERS! accept your mistakes!
That car driver is a fucking retard - the morobuke is going as fast as any other car on the road exempt for the fucking prick in that car thats turning at ridiculously slow speed for the road its on - I would love burn out my rear tyre over his face!!
@DaJungleDred Typical retard biker thesis. the car has the right to do a manouver. he did with all the precautions. turning signal on. with a reasonable speed. if the biker thinks he can run in such a way at the far right lane is simply retard.all this happened due to the unreasonable choice of speed from the biker. after all the car driver didnt have a scrach. the biker did. i bet if he didnt run and drive more responsibly towards his life he would have gone home that day. PS. you are a retard!
@VangelisZl You my friend, are the retard. This guy LEGALLY should have had his hazards on. Crossing two lanes of traffic on a 50-60 mph highway is a BIG mistake and asking for it. Doing 50-60 mph coming up on a car there is NO possible way to know that the car is not moving and to react fast enough to not hit it. I hit some lady that was stopped in the middle of a two lane highway with no blinkers and was doing 60 when I realized she was stopped and I hit her doing about 30.
@lastresort90 Pathetic excusion. he crossed only one lane. with the signal ON. retards! he has the signal ON! only you dont see it. there was nothing hiding the car while it was PULLING OVER!!!!! this is still legal i guess. and pulling over is done with reduced speed. since the aim IS to STOP!!!! RETARDS! he was pulling over!!! the bike was at the far right lane going fast. ILLEGAL! the far left is for those who go fast not the right.
@lastresort90 but he is moving already with reduced speed. if he hit the brakes he will stop. is this something you want? he will only stop when he has pulled over. this responds to the stoping lights. if the hazard lights you mean both yellow lights are on. no hazard lights are used during changing lanes or pulling over. he USES though the right yello light meaning he is crossing or changin lanes. why dont you see it people???? the light for changing lane is ON. nothin illegal here. sorry :P
@VangelisZl LMAO!!! Slow moving vehicles ARE REQUIRED by LAW to have Hazards turned on well driving on a high speed road. This guy is obviously being an idiot. Looks as if he almost missed where he was suppose to stop. And looks like he was going to pick up the person standing there. Why did he slowly cross 2 lanes of fast moving traffic that was going about 50 mph well he was pretty much stopped in the middle of the highway with NO flashers!?!?!. This guy was asking to be hit by something!
@lastresort90 As well as this guy has no brake lights or anything to indicate that he is moving slowly. Usually when you see brake lights you hit the brakes. He could have at rode the brakes while driving. As well as he pulled out in front of a moving object. He obviously was not checking his rear view mirror. And if he had checked his rear view mirror and not seen that guy it was probably because there was a bend in the road or possibly a hill. Either that or he was not paying attention.
@VangelisZl... You decent into abuse instead of reasoning, who is the retard? If a truck wipes out a car is it because the car is going to fast or is because the truck is doing a dumb ass manauver - Your on here to insult and no other reason, go fuck yourself whilst I go fuck your mum, peace :)
@DaJungleDred I dont remember calling you a retard in person. you only felt this way. maybe there is a reason. the example of the truck is just out of question. you are insulting my family and me. for what reason? you felt like i was talking to you? this is your problem not mine. its a great favour that i responded to you. the abuser is you with such thoughts of fucking etc. not me. you are pathetic using words like those for no reason. i have arguments that still are unresponded.
@DaJungleDred typical pathetic biker. everyone else's fault ever. pffff i dont care at all how lucky you are. i hope you drive responsibly. not like this retard in the video, retard! :P
If I were riding, i'd have noticed that idiot early and not been doing twice the speed limit :) Then i'd have pulled over up the road, doubled back, removed his keys from the ignition, put them in my jacket pocket and hit the road again..
@nair0bij0nes Clearly he is going around the speed limit or at least same speed as traffic that passes. You can say you would done something different when you are watching it on the computer. You really don't know what you would do in till your are in the situation yourself.
That car looses points for driving like 10 miles per hour on the highway. But I wasn't there so I can't make judgements. Nice job of the biker for locking his front tire so he wouldn't get massacred by that cars rear fenders.
IT is the car's fault 100%......he completely crossed over the traffic lanes without doing a shoulder check, nor did the driver of the car use any turn signals.
There is no way the driver on the motorcycle could have stopped in time with such short notice. I hope the driver of the car went to jail.
@videocircus Except that the driver did use a turning signal. And there's no way of telling that they didn't do a head check, bikes are a lot smaller than cars and easy to miss
@videocircus as i see it these are the facts. 1)the car was moving slowly WITH the signal on (if you look more carefully you will see the light. the light only stopes when the car has completed the move at 0:10). 2)After the crash we see no other cars passing by on the far right lane = no cars or any other obstacles were hiding the white car while it was pulling over! 3) the bike at the moment of the collision had the same speed with the black car at the fast lane, which is the far left.
@videocircus SO it is more then obvious that the mistake is 95% due to the choice of speed of the bike and 5% due to the speed of the car while pulling over. Bikers should eventually learn that the one moment they are not seen ant the next they are crashing if they are moving illegaly fast. I hope the bike driver never rides a bike again thus hurting no other people's cars driving so carelessly. :)
@VangelisZl The motorcyle is not going that fast at all.
The driver of the car crossed over two lanes without using his warning signals and without doing a Shoulder check......which is the most important thing a driver must legaly do under the law.Also the driver of the car was driving dangerously slow. There simply was not enough time for the guy on the motorcycle to react to what the car was doing.
Trust me, I drive a motorcycle and the breaking systems and times are totaly different.
@videocircus 1st) you have no sense of speed if you say the bike was not going fast. 2nd) the signal is on. why dont you see it i dont know. ask for someone else to see the video if you cant see it. the signal IS ON!. 3rd) there is NO WAY you can see if the driver did a shoulder check. you are just guessing to obtain an argument. 4th) U=S/T. IF U (speed) is too high and you have a fixed S (which is the distance) you will get a small T. This responds to the insufficient respond time of the bike.
@videocircus you are aware that it takes two people to crash, right? Yes, the driver made a piss-poor decision. But so did the motorcyclist for going as fast as he was and for looking ahead to see a big white car pulling in front of him. It's BOTH parties' responsibility to drive and ride safely.
@36MonkeysThatFly Once again..............They guy on the motorcyle is NOT going fast!
Watch the other cars and then watch his speed and you will clearly see that he is traveling more or less the exact same speed as the other cars on the highway.
The mistake you are making is allowing yourself to be manipulated by the "Slow" pace of the car that caused the accident taking your focus and attention away from what is really happening on the highway.
An experienced biker would have known to NOT apply strong FRONT brakes, and would have known to move around the 'cager'.
Old man's fault, but lack of experience put the biker into the car.
cjschaff 3 months ago 2
fucking moron driver!!
PaulAnthonyEscobar 3 months ago
Hmmm....
I put it at around 3.5 second gap between the old man and the biker, from the point the driver turned into the bikers' lane.
Personally, I don't think the biker would of been travelling that fast to have hit him like that, and yes, old people should be re-tested, each year, after a certain age.
Carelessness causes fatalities, I do hope the biker was ok.
meethrip 3 months ago
old people sould have to have a test taken every year to know HOW TO USE TURNING SIGNALS AND NOT TO STOP DEAD ON A HIGHWAY or a fast road..
planeboy1000 3 months ago
What the hell was that driver thinking?
mccarthy155 3 months ago
So he crawls in fontt of the car'
offenderofmanythings 3 months ago
Typical fucking cager. They ALWAYS do that. And look at all the people standing around, none even rushed over to help the rider. I love society.
joshiscool1989 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
joshiscool1989 3 months ago
Idiots in the car need their asses kicked. The old fart should have his license pulled.
ITCXTC 4 months ago 14
Must see full footage.Old guy is blaming to the other that is his fault!
ziodro 4 months ago
i had a good feeling it was an old person driving the car....ur right the biker shouldve seen it comin but on the other hand the driver was a huge idiot and was in a hurry to get in the turnin lane but went really slow gettin there....add me on twitter @turboe1989
turboe1989 4 months ago
Epic fail..... What the hell was the car driver thinking.... Biker should have saw it coming tho with the slow speed of the car.
acedagain34 4 months ago
Wow that car driver must feel like an ass hole
PunaniJohnny 4 months ago
Yeah, the only problem is they do have licenses and they do drive, and yes they will violate your right of way, make random crazy lane changes like depicted in the video above, make u-turns at whim, etc. The possibilities are endless, all I am saying is on two wheels you should be aware and ready for all this $hit. I a not saying that driver is good or bad cause every driver I have seen on two wheels as AFAIK is out to kill me for the most part. Just be aware this happens like everyday.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
Slow down, saving one minute doesn't worth a life.
catalinaumbert 4 months ago
@eatingcatshit: Hey man! Eat cat shit!
MadTinky 4 months ago
on the driving scool you lurn that you cant go in 1 time to the sid but in 2/3 times
harmsmeengestraat 4 months ago
you fucking fucks fucking jewish muslim faggots who talk shit,obviously it wasn't bikers foult so shut the Fuck up you low life retard piece of shit cus if that happened to me Id be jamping on the old fuck head that long untill he never fucking think again to get on road!!!
superpauly1000 4 months ago
I love the brainless retards at the bus stop just casually watching. Dude just rear ended a car flew 20 feet and fucked himself up. No biggie apparently
cascist 4 months ago
@cascist I agree that's some messed up $hit, that one dude just casually looks then glances away. No help-damn that's cold, but you would be surprised that happens everywhere.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
He thinks it's just a videogame
HorusFlint 4 months ago
Thats just how vulnerable bikes are. No matter who you ram , you will lose
sustantivo1espritu 4 months ago
@sustantivo1espritu Bikes are vulnerable yes, hit anything you will lose, yes. So I ride like everyone is out to kill me. And a healthy level of paranoia is preferable if not desirable for riding these streets. I don't make assumptions about drivers, nor do I trust them-they will violate your right of way, blow red stop lights, turn left in front of you, make random u turns, don't stop at stop signs, rear end you, etc. Do whatever it takes to stay alive and avoid them on two wheels.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
@MrUrnameis Spot on buddy, i ride the same as you. and although the car in the video did an incredibly stupid manouvre, the biker should have seen it happenning and acted accordingly. Too many bikers ride a bit too fast to react to avoidable collisions. Always assume that the vehicle in front is being driven by a partially sighted moron who has a tendency to fool you into a false sense of security before trying to surprise you with an idiotic move. Ride safe dude!!!
alecr666x 4 months ago
Now this is a case of "Who in the fuck gave that car driver their licence.They dont deserve one driving like that.Hope the rider was all good.
MrCriticOfAll 4 months ago
@MrCriticOfAll Anyone that's ridden long enough to be alive and still typing responses on Youtube knows that people in cars are unpredictable; therefore, if you are on two wheels adjust speeds for that element of surprise from the cagers, not saying it will help, but it's better than just flying straight into the rear end of a car or at least try to dodge that car by scanning the road ahead for those dangers. I expect that $hit every day I ride- people do crazy $hit with cars.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
honestly it was a retarded move by the person in the car to slooowwwlllyy switch 3 lanes on a highway, but it looks like the biker could have reacted to that way faster if he had been looking ahead. if i'm speeding on the highway (which i usually am) i'm always looking 10 seconds ahead. had I seen this car do this maneuver i would have instantly slowed and swerve into the lane he had came from.
Criminal082 4 months ago
old grannys
DruMaCh 4 months ago
I would sue the crap out of the moron in the car. You don't make a right hand turn from 3 lanes over. Since it is on tape. I am sure this will cost him good.
slowmotion4x4 4 months ago
@slowmotion4x4 It'll probably cost HER good...
monster271 4 months ago
@slowmotion4x4 American's and lawsuits!!! May Allah protect you all.
MrCriticOfAll 4 months ago
@slowmotion4x4 you can make a right hand turn from 3 lanes over if you do it quick like your supposed to and you have enough time to do it, serious wtf driving here, no person in their right mind changes lanes at that speed on a busy highway, i would have stripped them of their licence immediately and ordered them off the road for good. That is of course they arent in jail already for reckless endangerment.
raff23 4 months ago
あほなバイクだ、前方不注意・スピード出し過ぎ。。。
syuwachandaisuki 4 months ago
I see the car was moving slowly, but again, it's still the bikes fault and here's why. Had the car moved quickly into the path of the bike, with little room, it would be the cars fault. However there was ample time for the biker to slow down, HAD he been looking ahead at all times, and NOT speeding. Yes, I think the bike rider was likely distracted and looking elsewhere, then when he looked back, suddenly it was too late.
eatingcatshit 4 months ago
2, bikes can stop much faster than cars can, and can go from 50mph-0 in 1.7 seconds. Add .75 sec for reaction time for total of 2.45sec. From point car enters lane until impact, 3 seconds elapses, however bike is still going the same speed as other cars around him and is not even close to zero or stopped. Showing he was very late to react, and also possibly was speeding at a much higher speed. So it's not like it's all the cars part, if any at all.
eatingcatshit 4 months ago
@eatingcatshit i dont find it the biker fault.. i mean.. the car changes lane so quickly without checking.. and the biker did try to brake by he did a stoppie.. and how is he going to stop in time with that speed..
jasonyeozhishen 4 months ago
Comment removed
eatingcatshit 4 months ago
what an asshole car driver :@
MrAbazaadmin 4 months ago
If that happend to me and i was o.k. the driver would very quickly be the worse for wear.
volatilefists 4 months ago
@volatilefists, so not only would you be an asshole for inattentive driving, but then after you plowed into him, you'd start a fight? Hopefully you lose your license. People like you don't deserve to be on the road.
eatingcatshit 4 months ago
@eatingcatshit Your Name sez it all mate. You can go on the big list of I dont give a fuck. Cause seriously I really dont. HAVE A NICE DAY :)
volatilefists 4 months ago
fucking idiot
karlos7360 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go to
timepasstou.blogspot.com
you will cum so hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ownerfun4u 4 months ago
fuck that driver
JUNGTHEME 4 months ago 11
i hope the rider was ok and i hope the law suite went his way to!
4mattson 4 months ago
@4mattson, true. I hope the person in the car sues the bike rider, especially if his neck got hurt or injured .
eatingcatshit 4 months ago
the car is very very wrong stupid driver...
junledda 4 months ago
Zajebał bym tego skurwysyna od tej starej Warszawy,normalnie bym go zatłukł.
PP20021977 4 months ago
great lane change buddy
leafsfan234 4 months ago
Wow that was fucked up. Stupid fucking drivers like that shouldn't be allowed on the road..
StCubathegreat 4 months ago
@StCubathegreat Regardless of what you call the car driver if you are on two wheels and you let a driver like that do that to you, and you survive you are lucky, but if you die it doesn't matter whether the driver is stupid or a genius, you are the one riding the two wheels take initiative to avoid that car. Most cagers don't see us, hear us, or care that we are on two wheels, and they will gladly take you out with their automobiles if you let them. Granted some stuff is unavoidable but come on.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
@MrUrnameis ??? I'm not really sure why you wrote this as a reply. Are you saying that people who drive like this SHOULD be allowed to continue putting everyone's lives in danger with their stupidity and lack of thinking? I know that every time I go out on my bike I'm in a lot more danger than someone in a car, and I accept that. It's people who drive like this that make it more dangerous then it should be. I was saying that people who drive like that shouldn't have a licence. That's all.
StCubathegreat 4 months ago
@StCubathegreat I am sorry but were I ride this is like an every day thing. So I just naturally expect this $hit.
From people with valid driving licenses blowing stop signs, not stopping at all, running red lights, deciding to make random illegal u-turns, or left turns in front of motorcycles, or backing out of parking lots without looking back to check for traffic or motorcyclists, you just either adapt to the environment on two wheels or give up riding.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
@StCubathegreat Oh on a side note I do believe the driving license tests and motorcycle license tests could be better. Sometimes I just think they hand out those driving license to people. There are way too many crazy drivers out there+compound that with cellphone technology (texting) to help keep a driver distracted and we have a recipe for disaster and when was the last time anyone used the serpentine circle maneuver, beside to get your license.
MrUrnameis 4 months ago
esta mal el titulo....
el del auto es el loko hijo de puta
truedeathnote 5 months ago
well as a biker we must keep our vision far ahead to anticipate. and there's plenty of room to countersteer to left rather than braking and waiting to crash. after all, there's no car nearby on the left lane so its safe and relatively an easy task. but then again, the car was the one responsible the most :)
GeraldEdberg 5 months ago
It hurts to seek the rider crawling...fuck you the car driver i hope you are dead as I am watching this.
awesome4surya 5 months ago
Probably his car ra out of fuel and.. fucking amateur driver.I hate old people driving.
KarovskiMite 5 months ago
Was the bike ok D:
TheFoxrider56 5 months ago
U have to maintain a certain speed above and below the limit.
hiphop6911 5 months ago
If the car driver wanted to turn off the road then he should have already been in the right lane where its safer n which case the biker would have seen the car and there wouldnt have been an accident...
MarkE2099 5 months ago
too slow is just as dangerous as too fast.
viasevenvai 5 months ago 2
@viasevenvai absolutely correct!
hiphop6911 5 months ago
look at those people just standing there.....
AryanAcepilot36 5 months ago
By law it's the biker's fault..
BlackToyotaTacoma 5 months ago
Guys,
changing MORE THAN ONE LINES on a time, its not just stupid
ITS GAY.
And DRIVING FAST ON THE RIGHT LINE, its not GAY.
ITS SUICIDE.
BloodPresence 5 months ago
you all are arguing if the blinker is on or off.... a on blinker does not automaticaly give u right to switch multiple lanes like that.... u first must check if u are clear to do that maneuver.
bogdyBIG 5 months ago
not one by-stander helped out.. pathetic..
reuben2225 5 months ago
Old man want to go in WC and only make shit in midle of road
59nenadftw 5 months ago
U mother fucker if u don't know how two drive a car u bitch stay at home
adilrazzaq100 5 months ago
fuck old men drivers!!!
goiskingofeuosmo 5 months ago
drivers fault, no blinker and changing lanes at a slower pace than minium speed limit
FeelingLOL 5 months ago
@FeelingLOL You can clearly see his blinker on. In my opinion the bike was going too fast. He had ample opportunity to avoid the car. He also locked up the front wheel. The car was goimng too slow for the passing/fast lane though.
667Metalhead 5 months ago
@667Metalhead < almost as retarded as the car driver
couger911 5 months ago
He braked too hard on the front brakes. He starts flipping even before his front tire hit the car. Ofcourse he would flipped anyhow but braking on both the brakes would have certainly made the impact smaller.
And look at the idiot car driver, wandering as if he is just arrived at 7/11.
Mark1Mach2 5 months ago
I guess it's the fault of the motorcyclist. The driver used his signal. The rider shouldn't be speeding anyway.
PIAvevo 5 months ago
@PIAvevo WRONG! On streets like this/highway it's illegal to slow to almost zero and then immediately cross 3-4 lanes. You MUST do it gradually and in a manner that does not endanger other commuters
BarbaShime 5 months ago 2
@BarbaShime Ok Ok.. There is not a need to fight. We can ONLY predict but cannot confirm. We never know whose fault is it.
PIAvevo 5 months ago
@PIAvevo its the car's drivers fault. when you change lanes, you MUST check if someone is passing you. I'd kill a person who does it to make sure he never comes back on the road.
Adasiek9595 5 months ago
i would have killed that dope in the car...
joey7286 5 months ago
shall i check the lanes first?
no we just go on the count of three..
needbettername7 5 months ago
Fucking old people...
FreeAndroidAppsGames 5 months ago
i hope that driver got punished... clearly he has no driver awareness fucking idiot!
wanlop46 5 months ago
on the whole, that guy had an angle.
puketinho 5 months ago
that bastard comes out of his car like nothing happened!
Minemetsa45 5 months ago
You never pass from the right!
VWagenakias1992 5 months ago
He had all the room in the world to go around the car. Must be an inexperienced motorcycle rider.
YesYou123333 5 months ago
@YesYou123333 noob d bike was in speed he cannot just turn werever he wants ....he can skid...dat ass car driver didnt had rear view mirrors
rixiville 5 months ago
i would have done something different because i practice defensive driving and i use defensive driving. I don't mash on my brakes and hope i stop it in time because 80% of the time you wont. What i do in situations like this is look around and swerve to avoid an accident. Dont tell me that u cant do something like that quick enough because ive done it multiple times on my bike, motorcycle and even more often in my tiny ass miata. This was one of those situations u could have easily avoided.
metalicsupra 6 months ago
I just love how those idiots on the side just stand there and act like nothing happened when they should've went over and checked on his condition and call an ambulance. Hate people who act like that.
Asianboiii 6 months ago
Perhaps the car had a problem and was pulling to the curb (it is an old car called Warszawa, last yr of production 1973). The motorcyclist was behind the car, he ran into the car, not the other way around. Looking ahead is the basic safety principle of driving.Obviously, the rider didn't notice the old car pulling over in time. Even if it was the Warszawa driver's fault the motorcyclist could probably avoid the incident if he looked ahead far enough.
keborylam 6 months ago
He could've missed that if her counter steered to the left.
Curt8153 6 months ago
This angers me, I will go to sleep thinking about this, probably think about it again tomorrow, the biker made no mistake but lost his bike and probably hurt himself, this is my worst nightmare.
RevNathanD32 6 months ago
@RevNathanD32
Motorcyclist did make a mistake. He didn't look far enough to spot a slow moving car across the lanes. He was riding too fast for his field of vision. You may think the rider is blameless but the accident could have been avoided.
keborylam 6 months ago
@keborylam
dude, on a speedway you go +100km/hr (+60mph) and a stopping distance for a very good motorcycle at that speed can be like 60m (200feet).
arsenedevos 6 months ago
@arsenedevos
I understand your point. I agree that the car was at fault...but being right and hurt (or dead) is just as stupid and reckless as the moronic move the car's driver made. Consider: at 100km/h rider travels approx 28 m/sec. The car takes roughly 3.7 sec to complete its boneheaded move. In 3.7 sec the rider travelled 103.6 meters, plenty of distance to stop or at least slow down the bike to make an evasive maneuver. He did not scan far enough. Tunnel vision kills !!!!
keborylam 6 months ago
"Hao much signal I need to cut across 8 lane? None? I turn now. Good luck everybody else!"
unirnmes 6 months ago 2
@unirnmes haha Family guy Love it :)
1l0r1a3c 6 months ago
Driver's fault. The biker wasn't even going faster than traffic
frigginjoe 6 months ago
drivers like that should be fucking whipped
megapwn333 6 months ago
the turn signal is to change one lane not 1 millions especially when not checking...it is definetaly granpa's fault but the biker shouldn't be going that fast on the right lane...
georgerelax7302 6 months ago
If I could get up. I would walk right to the driver and punch him in the face!
Hollowman110886 6 months ago
the car was practically stopped in the left lane on a busy road and tried pulling off to the right crossing highway speed traffic n he takes his sweet ass time, drivers fault
brandon79f150 6 months ago
i want to see more. like the dude on the bike BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF THOSE DUMB CUNTS
Gazzz87 6 months ago
Old fucking slack-jawed, brain-stemmed piece of worthless throw-up...
He shoulda been shot in the head twice.
1212sman 6 months ago
why am I not surprised the people who got out of the car were old folks.
youreadork 6 months ago
@vangel the bike was traveling at the same speed as the other cars in the video... The moron crossing multiple lanes of traffic and is way under the speed is clearly not at fault.
jstratton55 6 months ago
Lol.. i sneezed and missed the crash.. damn it.
ArturIsHere 6 months ago
notice dat guy towards d right
yeshneo 6 months ago
and then i would blow his brains out as the rest of the passengers watched...
chrisxr650l 6 months ago
really if anyone has an arguments based to time stopping time distance as he can measure it or any other argument i whuld like to discuss. noone has answered my arguments about stopping time and if there was time to avoid this. of course there was time. almost 3 seconds IF (i say again) IF the bike was going 60mph. its obvious he didnt. we see the brake lights on when the bike enters the camera. so he was braking and still didnt avoid this. he had 80 meters and more than 2,5 seconds and yet...
VangelisZl 6 months ago
check a site . google sport bikes stopping times and choose 209-motorcycle safety site. there you will find the answers you seek on how stupid this biker was. and how wrong everyone is trying to defend this badass driver who broke the innocent man's car.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl your an idiot for thinking he is "innocent". The car driver had no signal switching lanes AND he switched 2 lanes at once AND without obviously doing proper checks over his shoulder otherwise he would have seen the bike! its common sense you smartass
PouriaLDN 6 months ago
@PouriaLDN again a pathetic response to my arguments. the bike had more the 80 meters and 2,5 seconds to react. there were no obstacles. the car performes a pull over=reduced speed with turning signal ON. he crossed on lane and then entered the far right lane which is for such reasons NOT for traffic. the bike was going too fast. also bad choice of place to be. if you dont have a serious argument please dont humiliate your self with pathetic excuses like he didnt check.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@PouriaLDN maybe there is a reason why this video is called CRAZY motorcycle crash on highway? common sense my ass pathetic looser. do you have arguments based on physics time capabilities of the bike? do you know that the far right lane is used to enter or exit or pull over?? didnt you know that the far right lane is not for speeding as if you were at the far left? where is your common sense pathetic idiot? if you read my older posts i clearly justify why its the bike's fault. morron
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl LOL u make me laugh, read you comment see if you understand wtf your talking about. CRAZY motorcycle crash means its a crazy a crash with a bike involved you retarded cunt! they cars speed is TOO low even for the far lane, also watch video carefully with your retarded vision and you can see the bike is going same speed as other cars. Common sense is for what ever reason you need to get into the hard-shoulder it should be done safely by switching lanes one by one. ur funny doe still!
PouriaLDN 6 months ago
@PouriaLDN this is just your opinion. doesnt mean its the correct one. you are pathetic assuming your judgement is beyond debate. the car pulled over so the speed naturally is low. he has the right to pull over unless you forbid him to do so. if my retardes vision is correct the bike enters the camera with brake lights on. so he was braking so if he goes then with the same speed as others it means he was going faster before! common sense remember morron? do you know physics? read my other posts
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@PouriaLDN and if you dont agree with my physics just post an argument. dont just say your opinion. i'm beyond this. i offer you an argument with numbers based on physics. can you respond to that? the bike had 80 meters distance or more and at least 2,5 seconds to react. its not the car's speed to blaim since if the bike was going with legal speed he could have stoped or at least avoided the crash. stop accusing the car like old bitches. start thinking that maybe its the bikes fault 100%!
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl 100%?? you honestly telling me the car has done NOTHING wrong? "like old bitches"?? your trying way too hard to cuss lol
PouriaLDN 6 months ago
noone is man enought to to get over with his ego and blaim the bike which was going too fast. pathetic especially its so sad to see bikers trying to defend such a mistake here. i feel sorry for you bikers..
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@uglytruth1 you must understand that the time the car made his choice the bike was at least 3 seconds away. is this a 60 mph road? lets say it is. 60mph=96,56Km/h. so 96.560m/3600s=26.82m/s! the bike had 3 seconds to readh the car. SO 3*26.82m=80,46m! MMM yes the car made the right choice. the bike was way to far! he has the right to pull over WITH signal ON. the biker had space and time to react. unless he didnt pay attention. the choice to be at the far right didnt do him any good.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl You are wrong. Plain and simple.
maxtolan 6 months ago
@maxtolan I'm right. Plainer and simpler! :p i gave numbers. anyone against physics? please give me your opinion on how far the bike was.. i said around 80m! anyone else?
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl Who care's about your numbers. The car essentially made a right turn from the center lane with traffic moving at speed in the right lane. He failed to properly check for traffic and turned in front of other vehicles. The car was also traveling at unsafely slow speeds without hazard lights on. Lastly, he changed more than one lane at once. The only thing the car did right was use his turn signals. However, that doesn't give the car a free pass to make turns in front of other vehicles
maxtolan 6 months ago
@maxtolan obviously you think everyone on the road is a robot making a billion calculations /sec. the bike was too far. 80m the car driver obiviously thought he had time to perform the pull over. he crossed a lane and at the end of the manouver the bike hit him. the bike didnt even try to avoid him
he applied the brakes way too late. this concludes to the fact that he was going too fast at the right lane where vehicles have the right to pull over.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@maxtolan My point is that the bike was at the wrong place. too right for going with 60mph. the reaction of the biker was pathetic. there was nothing blocking the view of the biker. the car made a steady carefull manouver to pull over. its his right to do so. pulling over is done with reduced speed since you aim to stop. the car crossed one lane. the far right is the extra not for traffic lane. i think a bus may stop a few meters ferther. so only one lane crossed
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl I agree that the car probably thought he had time to perform the pull over. However, he was incorrect in that calculation. You can't tell whether or not the bike tried to avoid the car from this angle. You can't see what he did prior to entering the camera's field of view.
I hope that you don't live in the United States. It's scary to know that I have to share the roads with people like you. That's why I wear all my gear when I ride.
maxtolan 6 months ago
@maxtolan bikes like this can come to a full halt while going 60mph in under 3 seconds using only 126 feet distance. 126ft=38,4 meters. if he applied the brakes he would have reduced the speed to perform a safe pass on the left. obviously you must wear all the gear if you think there is nothing wrong with this biker. maybe there is a reason why the video is posted. crazy motorcycle...:P dont worry im european.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl Thank God.
maxtolan 6 months ago
@uglytruth1 LOL NO if another car hit the white car. it would be the other car's fault. what you can not understand is that the white car took all precautions had signals on. has the right to pull over. and that the following vehicles MUST choose the correct speed and distance from the vehicles in front of them. its now clear that you think that i have something against bikes. i dont. all this time you try to defend bikes. hillarious. you dont see the point here. typical retard biker! LOL
VangelisZl 6 months ago
AGAIN until its percivable from the retard biker riders. the bike had no obstacles in front of it hiding the movement of the white car. the white car had the turning signal on. he has the right since NOONE is at his right to manouver and pull over. the next second the bike crashes on him. SO. the bike was an amateur. he was going to fast at the far right lane (illegal). There is no excuse. the speed of the bike and the choice of positiion is what caused this crash.BIKERS! accept your mistakes!
VangelisZl 6 months ago
That car driver is a fucking retard - the morobuke is going as fast as any other car on the road exempt for the fucking prick in that car thats turning at ridiculously slow speed for the road its on - I would love burn out my rear tyre over his face!!
DaJungleDred 6 months ago
@DaJungleDred Typical retard biker thesis. the car has the right to do a manouver. he did with all the precautions. turning signal on. with a reasonable speed. if the biker thinks he can run in such a way at the far right lane is simply retard.all this happened due to the unreasonable choice of speed from the biker. after all the car driver didnt have a scrach. the biker did. i bet if he didnt run and drive more responsibly towards his life he would have gone home that day. PS. you are a retard!
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl You my friend, are the retard. This guy LEGALLY should have had his hazards on. Crossing two lanes of traffic on a 50-60 mph highway is a BIG mistake and asking for it. Doing 50-60 mph coming up on a car there is NO possible way to know that the car is not moving and to react fast enough to not hit it. I hit some lady that was stopped in the middle of a two lane highway with no blinkers and was doing 60 when I realized she was stopped and I hit her doing about 30.
lastresort90 6 months ago
@lastresort90 Pathetic excusion. he crossed only one lane. with the signal ON. retards! he has the signal ON! only you dont see it. there was nothing hiding the car while it was PULLING OVER!!!!! this is still legal i guess. and pulling over is done with reduced speed. since the aim IS to STOP!!!! RETARDS! he was pulling over!!! the bike was at the far right lane going fast. ILLEGAL! the far left is for those who go fast not the right.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl NO brake lights, and NO hazard lights.. ILLEGAL!!!
lastresort90 6 months ago
@lastresort90 but he is moving already with reduced speed. if he hit the brakes he will stop. is this something you want? he will only stop when he has pulled over. this responds to the stoping lights. if the hazard lights you mean both yellow lights are on. no hazard lights are used during changing lanes or pulling over. he USES though the right yello light meaning he is crossing or changin lanes. why dont you see it people???? the light for changing lane is ON. nothin illegal here. sorry :P
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl LMAO!!! Slow moving vehicles ARE REQUIRED by LAW to have Hazards turned on well driving on a high speed road. This guy is obviously being an idiot. Looks as if he almost missed where he was suppose to stop. And looks like he was going to pick up the person standing there. Why did he slowly cross 2 lanes of fast moving traffic that was going about 50 mph well he was pretty much stopped in the middle of the highway with NO flashers!?!?!. This guy was asking to be hit by something!
lastresort90 6 months ago
@lastresort90 As well as this guy has no brake lights or anything to indicate that he is moving slowly. Usually when you see brake lights you hit the brakes. He could have at rode the brakes while driving. As well as he pulled out in front of a moving object. He obviously was not checking his rear view mirror. And if he had checked his rear view mirror and not seen that guy it was probably because there was a bend in the road or possibly a hill. Either that or he was not paying attention.
lastresort90 6 months ago
As well if there was a bend in the road or a hill he should not have been moving that slowly period!.
lastresort90 6 months ago
@VangelisZl... You decent into abuse instead of reasoning, who is the retard? If a truck wipes out a car is it because the car is going to fast or is because the truck is doing a dumb ass manauver - Your on here to insult and no other reason, go fuck yourself whilst I go fuck your mum, peace :)
DaJungleDred 6 months ago
@DaJungleDred I dont remember calling you a retard in person. you only felt this way. maybe there is a reason. the example of the truck is just out of question. you are insulting my family and me. for what reason? you felt like i was talking to you? this is your problem not mine. its a great favour that i responded to you. the abuser is you with such thoughts of fucking etc. not me. you are pathetic using words like those for no reason. i have arguments that still are unresponded.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl QUOTE PS. you are a retard! END QUOTE
But hey I've been called worse and survived, just make sure that car isn't on any road I am, or I might not be as lucky.
DaJungleDred 6 months ago
@DaJungleDred typical pathetic biker. everyone else's fault ever. pffff i dont care at all how lucky you are. i hope you drive responsibly. not like this retard in the video, retard! :P
VangelisZl 6 months ago
Yea mob this
flaflaflohiii 7 months ago
It's always the cars fault - this is the dogmatic idea of the motorcyclist ; don't you all know that ?
123itisfree 7 months ago
Am i wrong???There is noooo 0:17!!!
flaflaflohiii 7 months ago
@flaflaflohiii That's because the mob erased it, duh.
OVAngryE 7 months ago
@OVAngryE ok buddy u got me,i was a little slow on that 1.
flaflaflohiii 7 months ago
Um really on a four lane road basically coming to a stop to change three lanes C'mon with the it's the Bikes fault
mcstory5 7 months ago
and what about that asshole on the right who did nothing???
mrcferi 7 months ago
If I were riding, i'd have noticed that idiot early and not been doing twice the speed limit :) Then i'd have pulled over up the road, doubled back, removed his keys from the ignition, put them in my jacket pocket and hit the road again..
nair0bij0nes 7 months ago
@nair0bij0nes Clearly he is going around the speed limit or at least same speed as traffic that passes. You can say you would done something different when you are watching it on the computer. You really don't know what you would do in till your are in the situation yourself.
whothaplaya 7 months ago 10
@nair0bij0nes wow, you are quite possibly the biggest douche in the world.
Deango2 7 months ago
That car looses points for driving like 10 miles per hour on the highway. But I wasn't there so I can't make judgements. Nice job of the biker for locking his front tire so he wouldn't get massacred by that cars rear fenders.
TheMrOctapuss 7 months ago
the motorcycle guy is just lucky, its a split decision before the crash, he would'nt get time to even move a muscle to react.
freeguyii 7 months ago
aww poor car... XD
therobbiestudios 7 months ago
IT is the car's fault 100%......he completely crossed over the traffic lanes without doing a shoulder check, nor did the driver of the car use any turn signals.
There is no way the driver on the motorcycle could have stopped in time with such short notice. I hope the driver of the car went to jail.
videocircus 7 months ago 69
@videocircus Yes, i agree with your but it's the motorcycle fault too that he was at the right line. Right line is for a low speed limit.
PrimalzGR 7 months ago
@videocircus he did have is blinker on.. if u look u can see it
fferguson1992 7 months ago
@videocircus Except that the driver did use a turning signal. And there's no way of telling that they didn't do a head check, bikes are a lot smaller than cars and easy to miss
Imprezive241 7 months ago
@videocircus as i see it these are the facts. 1)the car was moving slowly WITH the signal on (if you look more carefully you will see the light. the light only stopes when the car has completed the move at 0:10). 2)After the crash we see no other cars passing by on the far right lane = no cars or any other obstacles were hiding the white car while it was pulling over! 3) the bike at the moment of the collision had the same speed with the black car at the fast lane, which is the far left.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@videocircus SO it is more then obvious that the mistake is 95% due to the choice of speed of the bike and 5% due to the speed of the car while pulling over. Bikers should eventually learn that the one moment they are not seen ant the next they are crashing if they are moving illegaly fast. I hope the bike driver never rides a bike again thus hurting no other people's cars driving so carelessly. :)
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@VangelisZl The motorcyle is not going that fast at all.
The driver of the car crossed over two lanes without using his warning signals and without doing a Shoulder check......which is the most important thing a driver must legaly do under the law.Also the driver of the car was driving dangerously slow. There simply was not enough time for the guy on the motorcycle to react to what the car was doing.
Trust me, I drive a motorcycle and the breaking systems and times are totaly different.
videocircus 6 months ago
@videocircus 1st) you have no sense of speed if you say the bike was not going fast. 2nd) the signal is on. why dont you see it i dont know. ask for someone else to see the video if you cant see it. the signal IS ON!. 3rd) there is NO WAY you can see if the driver did a shoulder check. you are just guessing to obtain an argument. 4th) U=S/T. IF U (speed) is too high and you have a fixed S (which is the distance) you will get a small T. This responds to the insufficient respond time of the bike.
VangelisZl 6 months ago
@videocircus Damn I agree with you pal the driver of that car should have been jailed
DaJungleDred 6 months ago
@videocircus you are aware that it takes two people to crash, right? Yes, the driver made a piss-poor decision. But so did the motorcyclist for going as fast as he was and for looking ahead to see a big white car pulling in front of him. It's BOTH parties' responsibility to drive and ride safely.
36MonkeysThatFly 6 months ago
@36MonkeysThatFly Once again..............They guy on the motorcyle is NOT going fast!
Watch the other cars and then watch his speed and you will clearly see that he is traveling more or less the exact same speed as the other cars on the highway.
The mistake you are making is allowing yourself to be manipulated by the "Slow" pace of the car that caused the accident taking your focus and attention away from what is really happening on the highway.
It is the Car's fault 100%
videocircus 6 months ago