I actually stole that line from Roddick himself. he told that to Monfils at the French when Monfils kicked his ass. Monfils has the fastest forehand ever fyi. Roddick, if you wanna talk trash during a Semifinal before you get another beating by Federer...be my guest.
um ok, i was talking about roddick;s serve being the fastest ever but that is something i didnt know so thnx, its always good to learn a new tennis fact. and itd make sense gael beat andy at the french cuz clay is roddick's worst surface and gael has the french crowd on his side. and he roddick didnt get a beating he lost in four sets in 06, it was a pretty close final
You're missing the point. Roddick is such a hypocrite. He got mad at Gael Monfils for shaking his head and told him to stop being cocky. His dumb ass says this shit and no one calls him out on it. Roddick is not good enough to bloviate about his abilities.
@365to173repubsPWNED how can anyone say that roddick isn't arrogant anyway? it's what makes him roddick, it's what makes him fun to watch. there needs to be more of this stuff, more connors/mcenroe/roddick/hewitt-argentines sort of attitude, i totally missed out on that era!
sorry, it's not getting better and better. you see top 10 players getting bageled (0-6) all the time. Federer has enjoyed dominating a very shallow field of talent. Now they're catching up to him. You must not know how tennis was like back in the Sampras/Agassi days. Also, nowadays they use poly strings like Luxilon and even the pro's say with it "they can't miss!"
Skill hasn't been increasing, but mindless baseline bashing has. No more serve and volleyers due to the new string technology.
womens tennis sucks ass...has become a muscle man power game ever since the likes of davenport, williams sisters (brothers), etc.. no more real skill/finesse ala Hingis, Graf, etc.
There's no one that dominates women's tennis like Hingis or Graf did.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There's no one that dominates men's tennis like Sampras did. Not even Federer. Look at the competition back in the Sampras day. Look at the no talent ass clowns Federer has for competition. Ferrer? Gasquet? Blake? Roddick? Wow, they're top 10?
sampras is my favorite player. I wish I was old enough to see him play. Agassi and sampras seemingly was a great rivalry, and serve and volleying is a greatly entertaining style. But both of these players have admitted that federer would beat them both.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
sorry, but no. an Agassi in his prime would have beat federer. he was frickin 36 years old when federer beat him.
Sampras? lol, sampras BEAT federer twice in the exhibition matches... He's old now too and retired!!
please, federer is fun to watch and a great competitor, but the competition just isn't what it used to be. the competition has been figuring out his game. for example, high bouncing shots to his backhand = federer is in trouble.
I dont agree. It is getting better. You think federer has a shallow field of talent and agassi / sampras didnt?? Much more competition now. Players can no longer rely on their strengths. They must be more versatile which is how the game has changed nowadays. Why do you think there are no serve volleyers anymore?? You dont see 1 dimensional players reach the top 50 anymore. What do the strings have to do with anything? Yes they are better but everyone gets them so its not an advantage.
Roddick is good, but he's not great. For being just good, he's a real prick. He needs to shake off his sense of entitlement, grow up and become a gentleman. This is a gentleman's sport, and he's making a mockery of it.
A guy like Federer beats him left handed with a blind fold on, and he'll always be a gentleman. On and off the court.
haha have you seen his record over federer?...uhm here 2-15. yeah...nice try. roddick gets lucky here and there against federer....but overall...fed will have the upper hand, hands down.
gets lucky? hmm i don't think so. roddick outplayed federer in miami. and forget the record. based on their most previous match, roddick has the upper hand.
that's based on their most previous match...any one can have a bad day...but roddick having it 15 times against fed and calling those wins lucky for federer...is unlikely. sure roddick was playing very well at miami, but his last victory over fed was at least 5 years ago.
Roddick may have only one slam, but hes not talentless... hes been consistently in the top 10 for most of his career up to date. Saying hes garbage and worthless is just wrong and ignorant. Until he starts sliding down the rankings, and negative comment serves no merrit. However, it looks like this new batch of phenoms is going to present a challenge... and im not even including Federer, the ultimate monkey on Andy's back
What do you mean arrogant? Have you ever watched his interviews and stuff? He's not arrogant. He's a cool guy with a good sense of humor. He always crack his audience/interviewers up.
really? you dont? weird.... i could of sworn he was in the 04 wimbledon final... and the 05 wimbledon final... come to mention it he was in the 06 us open final.. but maybe im wrong.
just to compare, exactly how many grand slams have you won in your life?? just so you know, andy is one of just FIVE men to have won a grand slam since 2003. THAT'S impressive!!
@blackgirltennis I agree its impressive but taking the 2003 US open as a start point he's actually one of SEVEN players to have won a grand slam; Roger, Rafa, Novak, Roddick, Del Potro, Gaudio and Safin
@shmoodlepoofe true but 'taking the 2003 US open as a starting point' its seven since the Aussie open is the first of the year and the 2003 edition was before the 2003 US which is the last grand slam of the year.
@funkiestmonk You are right but didn't you see that blackgirltennis wrote his message more than 3 years ago ? He certainly wrote that during the year 2007 and I don't think that at this time Djokovic and Del Potro had won any Grand Slam. (Sorry for my bad english)
@blackgirltennis THe argument that every immature F*CK on the internet uses when there's an argument goes like this: "Player X will kick your ass at [insert his sport here] so you can't say anything about him". Fighter X will kick your ass, Tennis player X will kick your ass at tennis, etc. You do realize that if the guy you wrote to is a surgeon his job is of much greater importance to society therefore he can say anything he wants about people with less important social status. ANYTHING.
Roddick is such a dick. Glad to see him failing lately.
Jackhammercock 3 months ago
that was a terrible challenge.
stevehwan 1 year ago
@bulldawgpoker959 Youzhny isn't a physco, he's russian
reedfe 1 year ago 4
@reedfe isn't that quite the same? haha, just kidding
wingra10 1 year ago
WTF 6-0? god dam lol
Tungchu92 1 year ago
roddick better watch it. youzhny is a psycho path. a joke could be taken bad with him and next thing you know your in the hospital
bulldawgpoker959 1 year ago
What's a Grand Slam?
And also.. I don't get this video, "Too big for you" Was it that Roddick's serve was so fast that Youzhy thought it was out when it was in?
fireshot22 1 year ago
@fireshot22 a grand slam tournament is a major one, not minor. examples: us open, wimbeldon, australian open, etc. It's pretty big.
IKnowWereYouSleep 1 year ago
Actually I´ve seen Murray in the chair on a challenge,so no t only big asshole Roddick
djcg88 1 year ago
Your a dumb ass. Can you beat roddick? No? Then why are you saying that he isn't good enough to be a little cocky!
Randbriggs1 1 year ago
Roddick is not good enough to be that cocky
365to173repubsPWNED 2 years ago
yeah i mean afterall he only has the fastest serve in the history of the game so of course he shouldnt be confident about it
Currymastuh 2 years ago 4
I actually stole that line from Roddick himself. he told that to Monfils at the French when Monfils kicked his ass. Monfils has the fastest forehand ever fyi. Roddick, if you wanna talk trash during a Semifinal before you get another beating by Federer...be my guest.
365to173repubsPWNED 2 years ago
um ok, i was talking about roddick;s serve being the fastest ever but that is something i didnt know so thnx, its always good to learn a new tennis fact. and itd make sense gael beat andy at the french cuz clay is roddick's worst surface and gael has the french crowd on his side. and he roddick didnt get a beating he lost in four sets in 06, it was a pretty close final
Currymastuh 2 years ago
You're missing the point. Roddick is such a hypocrite. He got mad at Gael Monfils for shaking his head and told him to stop being cocky. His dumb ass says this shit and no one calls him out on it. Roddick is not good enough to bloviate about his abilities.
365to173repubsPWNED 2 years ago
@365to173repubsPWNED how can anyone say that roddick isn't arrogant anyway? it's what makes him roddick, it's what makes him fun to watch. there needs to be more of this stuff, more connors/mcenroe/roddick/hewitt-argentines sort of attitude, i totally missed out on that era!
demondayzzz 1 year ago
Another Roddick bomb!
ThankYouMyTwilight 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
It really anoys me when he does that with his shirt. Anyone agree ?
GraceSmellx3 2 years ago
shut the fuck up
jca23 2 years ago
What ? Jeesh ! What's with the thumb down ?
GraceSmellx3 2 years ago
man youzhny has got nothing on roddick
bststeepee 2 years ago 2
what the hell is with all the i-hate-roddick comments, if you hated him so bloody much then why waste YOUR time on the videos HE is in?
can someone explain the logic, or are the anti-roddick followers just trying to make some form of stupid point?
roddick is a great tennis player, stop saying he isnt otherwise he wouldn't be in the top ten!
duhhh.
loverofblink182 3 years ago
this shit is bootleg
vickmares 3 years ago
you can't win a slam and not be a great tennis player
GobTheIllusionist 3 years ago 19
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes you can. when the talent pool is as shallow as it is in the top 10 nowadays. compare to the top 10 of 5-10 years ago.
hyogen82 3 years ago
Is this a joke? The skill level in tennis keeps getting better andbetter.
Maybe if your watching womens tennis. That doesn't change much.
SRV138 3 years ago 2
sorry, it's not getting better and better. you see top 10 players getting bageled (0-6) all the time. Federer has enjoyed dominating a very shallow field of talent. Now they're catching up to him. You must not know how tennis was like back in the Sampras/Agassi days. Also, nowadays they use poly strings like Luxilon and even the pro's say with it "they can't miss!"
haha
hyogen82 3 years ago
Skill hasn't been increasing, but mindless baseline bashing has. No more serve and volleyers due to the new string technology.
womens tennis sucks ass...has become a muscle man power game ever since the likes of davenport, williams sisters (brothers), etc.. no more real skill/finesse ala Hingis, Graf, etc.
There's no one that dominates women's tennis like Hingis or Graf did.
hyogen82 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There's no one that dominates men's tennis like Sampras did. Not even Federer. Look at the competition back in the Sampras day. Look at the no talent ass clowns Federer has for competition. Ferrer? Gasquet? Blake? Roddick? Wow, they're top 10?
hyogen82 3 years ago
sampras is my favorite player. I wish I was old enough to see him play. Agassi and sampras seemingly was a great rivalry, and serve and volleying is a greatly entertaining style. But both of these players have admitted that federer would beat them both.
SRV138 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sorry, but no. an Agassi in his prime would have beat federer. he was frickin 36 years old when federer beat him.
Sampras? lol, sampras BEAT federer twice in the exhibition matches... He's old now too and retired!!
please, federer is fun to watch and a great competitor, but the competition just isn't what it used to be. the competition has been figuring out his game. for example, high bouncing shots to his backhand = federer is in trouble.
hyogen82 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
also, take a look at year 2008 for Federer. absolutely horrendous. He is on the decline already my friend -_-
hyogen82 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
really? can you find me a source where both players have admitted this? Also Agassi and Sampras played Federer in their recylining years you tool
pistolpete58 2 years ago
Williams brothers lol
ProcyonAlpha 3 years ago
That's so 100% true.
mysteriekiller 2 years ago
I dont agree. It is getting better. You think federer has a shallow field of talent and agassi / sampras didnt?? Much more competition now. Players can no longer rely on their strengths. They must be more versatile which is how the game has changed nowadays. Why do you think there are no serve volleyers anymore?? You dont see 1 dimensional players reach the top 50 anymore. What do the strings have to do with anything? Yes they are better but everyone gets them so its not an advantage.
thegarbageman21 2 years ago 4
koolkid: Wow...three finals of a course of a nine-year career how impressive.
that was problaly the worst tennis comment ever.. how can you say that win a grand slam and reach 3 finals in 5 years is not impressive?
lllppp1234 3 years ago
actually quite a lot of players got to the chair on a challenge when it's clearly in
matthewjamess45 4 years ago
Roddick is good, but he's not great. For being just good, he's a real prick. He needs to shake off his sense of entitlement, grow up and become a gentleman. This is a gentleman's sport, and he's making a mockery of it.
A guy like Federer beats him left handed with a blind fold on, and he'll always be a gentleman. On and off the court.
barzin23 4 years ago 3
it would b cool if you knew what you werer talking about
neelonghunglow 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea it's to bad Roddick can't beat a guy like federer- oh wait...
Etownmu 3 years ago
haha have you seen his record over federer?...uhm here 2-15. yeah...nice try. roddick gets lucky here and there against federer....but overall...fed will have the upper hand, hands down.
yuniegal 3 years ago
gets lucky? hmm i don't think so. roddick outplayed federer in miami. and forget the record. based on their most previous match, roddick has the upper hand.
Etownmu 3 years ago
that's based on their most previous match...any one can have a bad day...but roddick having it 15 times against fed and calling those wins lucky for federer...is unlikely. sure roddick was playing very well at miami, but his last victory over fed was at least 5 years ago.
yuniegal 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FUCK gentlemen's sport!! anyone who even thinks like that is a total pussy. u don't fucking play to praise ur opponent for hitting nice shots.
Etownmu 3 years ago
fuck gentlemen agression is key to survival niiice
Asswipe44 3 years ago
Too big is right. Atta boy, Andy. Keep pissing the haters off. :)
kataisa3 4 years ago 3
Roddick may have only one slam, but hes not talentless... hes been consistently in the top 10 for most of his career up to date. Saying hes garbage and worthless is just wrong and ignorant. Until he starts sliding down the rankings, and negative comment serves no merrit. However, it looks like this new batch of phenoms is going to present a challenge... and im not even including Federer, the ultimate monkey on Andy's back
roAchSteW 4 years ago 6
so happy whenever Roger crushes Roddick in majors,happy when Roddick goes out to guys like Andreev and Gasquet,Djokovic and Nadal.
Keep it up boys,take the arrogant one slam wonder OUT as often as possible!
timafi 4 years ago
how many grand slams have djokovic, andreev, and gasquet won combined??
blackgirltennis 4 years ago
only 1
dual4aces 3 years ago
Yeah, but when I wrote this, Djokovic hadn't won yet.
blackgirltennis 3 years ago
What do you mean arrogant? Have you ever watched his interviews and stuff? He's not arrogant. He's a cool guy with a good sense of humor. He always crack his audience/interviewers up.
ColAcoustic 3 years ago
lol i know right? that gasquet wimbledon match was awesome lol
Oopstoobad6275 4 years ago
just when you don't think he's a douchebag you see this. At least Roger gave him a nice whooping at the us open.
SpoogietheGreat 4 years ago
he knows when his serves are in and out. considering how in that serve really was, all of you should stop talking about poor sportsmanship.
liuser 4 years ago
roddick once again makes a jackass out of himself
seriously for once could he show some class?
TheDramalLama01 4 years ago
andy is so overrated. he has only won 1 grand slam
Oopstoobad6275 4 years ago
But who has won a grand slam besides federer in the recent years? safin, nadal i guess... who else?
bluenigma 4 years ago
accepted, but I don't see him in the finals...
koolkid776 4 years ago
really? you dont? weird.... i could of sworn he was in the 04 wimbledon final... and the 05 wimbledon final... come to mention it he was in the 06 us open final.. but maybe im wrong.
teneighty126 4 years ago 3
Wow...three finals of a course of a nine-year career how impressive.
koolkid776 4 years ago
just to compare, exactly how many grand slams have you won in your life?? just so you know, andy is one of just FIVE men to have won a grand slam since 2003. THAT'S impressive!!
blackgirltennis 4 years ago 20
@blackgirltennis I agree its impressive but taking the 2003 US open as a start point he's actually one of SEVEN players to have won a grand slam; Roger, Rafa, Novak, Roddick, Del Potro, Gaudio and Safin
funkiestmonk 7 months ago
@funkiestmonk EIGHT. agassi won the 2003 australian.
shmoodlepoofe 6 months ago
@shmoodlepoofe true but 'taking the 2003 US open as a starting point' its seven since the Aussie open is the first of the year and the 2003 edition was before the 2003 US which is the last grand slam of the year.
funkiestmonk 6 months ago
@funkiestmonk You are right but didn't you see that blackgirltennis wrote his message more than 3 years ago ? He certainly wrote that during the year 2007 and I don't think that at this time Djokovic and Del Potro had won any Grand Slam. (Sorry for my bad english)
NuttensoOhn 6 months ago
@blackgirltennis THe argument that every immature F*CK on the internet uses when there's an argument goes like this: "Player X will kick your ass at [insert his sport here] so you can't say anything about him". Fighter X will kick your ass, Tennis player X will kick your ass at tennis, etc. You do realize that if the guy you wrote to is a surgeon his job is of much greater importance to society therefore he can say anything he wants about people with less important social status. ANYTHING.
DestroyerAlexandros 2 months ago
he just sit in a fking chair,
tradingbr 4 years ago
haha imagine if that was out, that would be soo embarassing for roddick.
Tennisace7273 4 years ago
i hate roddick!!!! hes a jerk!!!
300roxhard 4 years ago
It's always sad to see a good sports person being a prick. Roddick needs some courtesy.
kekesun 4 years ago
never federer cant return
eeeeeeeeasd 4 years ago
he's ridiculous. All snobbish... Thank God Federer exists to destroy him.
maiscedu 4 years ago
so true
ezsebas 4 years ago
doubt it.
realityryan 4 years ago
Federer would have turned that into a winner
debussy84 4 years ago