Mr ignorance: Some of us drive 6300 pound Suburbans not because "we have the right to" but because we have 4 children and a wife. So it would seem quite difficult to cram my whole family, our gear, and our dog into a VW bug. Show me how to get my whole family into a compact vehicle and i will go sell by Suburban tomorrow. Myself, as well as millions of Americans drive SUVs because we truly utilize and need them.
One way to maximize safety for all drivers on the road is to set some standards for weight and height of vehicles on the road. Why does anybody need a 6000 lbs. truck to go to the supermarket. Some might say we have to right to in America. Yeah, but if your neighbor wanted drive around in an armed tank and keep a dozen tigers as pets on a street full children, should he be allowed to? Set weight and height vehicle standards and you'll still be able to drive what you want. Within reason of course
@1986celica The issue here would be the huge number of new and old vehicles already on the road that weigh 5000 lb+. No one wants their 2 year old Suburban condemned by the government, so no one would go for it.
@kovu159 cars that were manufactured before the law would be grandfathered in. they would still be legal, but you may need a special license to drive a vehicle over 5000 lbs, just like a truck driver. i personally don't feel safe knowing there are 16 year olds texting while driving their dad's international cxt.
@1986celica Mr ignorance: Some of us drive 6300 pound Suburbans not because "we have the right to" but because we have 4 children and a wife. So it would seem quite difficult to cram my whole family, our gear, and our dog into a VW bug. Tell me how to get my whole family into a compact car and i will sell my Suburban. But until then, millions of Americans like myself drive SUVs because we truly utilize and need them.
You are just as safe in a Honda as you are in ANY car! These safety tests are completely standard and anyone that thinks otherwise is fooling themselves. If you want better safety, you need to drive a bigger car or truck that's not a secret.
If you ever get into an accident I only pray that you are lucky enough to live. 3 stars, 5 stars or 10 stars, it means NOTHING in the real world. These are just ratings because people like to compete and say their product is better than your product. If a car was unsafe it could NOT be sold.
Well, I think you would fair MUCH better in this Honda than you would in some Russian car I saw. The thing crumpled up until the trunk! There was NOTHING left to the interior.
Where's the video of the Russian car? Do they even sell it here in North America? We have minimum standards that all cars must meet. I agree you would fair in this Honda Accord than in the Honda Fit/Jazz. Bigger is better.
It's called " The Worst Car Ever Fails Its Crash Test Miserably", but if you type in "worst crash test" in the search box, the video at the top is the one. The screensot is of a yellow chunk of metal with a wheel worked into the mess.
Nope, sorry. IIHS and EuroNCAP tests are not rigged. They are the same for all vehicles. And a heavier vehicle will do worse than a lighter, smaller one as it has the higher mass, thus it has more momentum. Basic physics. And look at the crash test of a 2003 Dodge Ram crashing into a 2003 Honda Accord. The Accord does pretty good.
You are right, it will have more momentum, which is a GOOD thing. Because the vehicle will have more momentum, it will not de-accellerate as fast as a small car. This means YOU don't get bashed around as hard.
I saw statistics which show twice the number of deaths of people driving smaller cars than large american cars or trucks/suv's.
You are right that it's basic physics, too bad you aren't applying it correctly.
But many new small vehicles are getting high crash test scores and big vehicles are not good as they make it worse for smaller vehicles when they collide with them. Imagine a Smart colliding with a Cadillac Escalade. What will be to the poor Smart? Big vehicles make the roads more dangerous for small ones. And more momentum means that the vehicle will take longer to stop. I agree that having a longer crumple zone helps, but big vehicles are not necessarily safer.
Yes, they do make it more dangerous for small cars, that is why I would never buy a Smart Car or a Honda Civic. Regardless of the crash tests, they are unsafe in the REAL world where big trucks and big cars drive.
You are right that it will take the vehicle longer to stop, I really don't care so long as I am alive. I don't care about the extra gas either, my family is worth it.
do you know why russian cars suck in crash tests? because they are really cars based on 45 year old fiat platforms. in those days, barely anybody thought about vehicle safety. i saw a crash test of a new, redesigned lada, if the euroncap rating system was used, it would have gotten 3 stars.
I own a Honda Accord 96 and got into a crash last week. I was going 50mph, the car crash as bad as in the vid (a little lesser I guess, the crashdeep not pass the front wheel) but it was total lost. The airbag worked good. Honda is fine!
Sux that you were in a crash. But seriously you would have been fine in any car. Don't let anyone fool you into thinking that their car is safer than everyone elses. That's just a marketing ploy use by Honda and others.
alright smart one,LOL go buy that chinese brilliance thing, if you live to see another day after getting into a crash with that car.. ill pay you 100 bucks. crash tests are real, i mean, why spend sooo much money on something fake.?
It's unfair because the TSX drives much better than any Accord. I know a lot of people say that the TSX is a glorified Accord but it's not. It is true that the engine DNA is very much like the US Accord, the TSX's engine has higher compression ratio (vs. 4cyl. Accord) and the suspension is stiffer; suspension alone will make the car feel much different.
the acura TSX is only called that in america, everywhere else they call it the accord. the US accord has a bouncy suspension, much softer power steering and overall has a much more cheap feel to it(typical for american cars)
yeah but even so the structure that was left after the crash wasn't even split. which was pretty impressive but what do you expect it's honda japanese.
35 mph is hardly realistic. 70-80mph would be - either motorway speed to standstill or combined velocity of two cars on a B-road...still safer than most though.
Its actually 40mph. Its designed for highway crashes. Because when you are doing 70-80mph, and a second later before hitting someone, assuming you know how to use the brakes you are doing 35-40mph. Thats for good cars.
Guys, this car is pretty old. Give it a chance.
MrDudezProductionz 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mr ignorance: Some of us drive 6300 pound Suburbans not because "we have the right to" but because we have 4 children and a wife. So it would seem quite difficult to cram my whole family, our gear, and our dog into a VW bug. Show me how to get my whole family into a compact vehicle and i will go sell by Suburban tomorrow. Myself, as well as millions of Americans drive SUVs because we truly utilize and need them.
ramblair32 1 year ago
crrrrrrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuunch
neerdowell7725 2 years ago
did they have a crash dummy with out a seat belt and did it went out the window
ChrisBennett18 2 years ago
we should all drive bumper cars!!!!!!!
jrowe6 3 years ago 3
One way to maximize safety for all drivers on the road is to set some standards for weight and height of vehicles on the road. Why does anybody need a 6000 lbs. truck to go to the supermarket. Some might say we have to right to in America. Yeah, but if your neighbor wanted drive around in an armed tank and keep a dozen tigers as pets on a street full children, should he be allowed to? Set weight and height vehicle standards and you'll still be able to drive what you want. Within reason of course
1986celica 3 years ago 24
This has been flagged as spam show
they already do that
smartkid1985 3 years ago
@1986celica The issue here would be the huge number of new and old vehicles already on the road that weigh 5000 lb+. No one wants their 2 year old Suburban condemned by the government, so no one would go for it.
kovu159 1 year ago
@kovu159 cars that were manufactured before the law would be grandfathered in. they would still be legal, but you may need a special license to drive a vehicle over 5000 lbs, just like a truck driver. i personally don't feel safe knowing there are 16 year olds texting while driving their dad's international cxt.
camaro76 2 months ago
Comment removed
ramblair32 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1986celica Mr ignorance: Some of us drive 6300 pound Suburbans not because "we have the right to" but because we have 4 children and a wife. So it would seem quite difficult to cram my whole family, our gear, and our dog into a VW bug. Tell me how to get my whole family into a compact car and i will sell my Suburban. But until then, millions of Americans like myself drive SUVs because we truly utilize and need them.
ramblair32 1 year ago
70,000th view ;)
whattheheck1000 3 years ago
You are just as safe in a Honda as you are in ANY car! These safety tests are completely standard and anyone that thinks otherwise is fooling themselves. If you want better safety, you need to drive a bigger car or truck that's not a secret.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
range rover only has 3 safety stars. that means it's not so good as a honda...
sylfamas 3 years ago
If you ever get into an accident I only pray that you are lucky enough to live. 3 stars, 5 stars or 10 stars, it means NOTHING in the real world. These are just ratings because people like to compete and say their product is better than your product. If a car was unsafe it could NOT be sold.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
Well, I think you would fair MUCH better in this Honda than you would in some Russian car I saw. The thing crumpled up until the trunk! There was NOTHING left to the interior.
lancerevo1994 3 years ago
Where's the video of the Russian car? Do they even sell it here in North America? We have minimum standards that all cars must meet. I agree you would fair in this Honda Accord than in the Honda Fit/Jazz. Bigger is better.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
It's called " The Worst Car Ever Fails Its Crash Test Miserably", but if you type in "worst crash test" in the search box, the video at the top is the one. The screensot is of a yellow chunk of metal with a wheel worked into the mess.
lancerevo1994 3 years ago
LOL, but a real person inside would actually re-inforce the structure (with their bones!).
Ok, that car is just designed for the wife!
Seriously though, you can't compare that joke to any real car. I wonder if they actually built any for sale? scarey!
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
I think I've become dumber by reading this exchange.
deepdriedspam 3 years ago
that is not a crash test - that vehicle was going at about 3 times crash test speed. none of today's vehicles would survive that kind of impact.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
yes it is its only at 35mph!!!! I imagine most cars would be 5 star at a 10mph crash
fxgtz 3 years ago
bigger vehicles are not necessarily safer: the 2008 hummer h3 gets a lower rating than the 2008 honda civic in the iihs front offset crash test.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
Ok, let's play a little road chicken!
I'll drive the Hummer and smash you in your Civic and then we'll see who's the stronger!
Again, these crash tests are biased and rigged. There is NO way a small car can out perform a larger truck sized vehicle. It's basic physics.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
Nope, sorry. IIHS and EuroNCAP tests are not rigged. They are the same for all vehicles. And a heavier vehicle will do worse than a lighter, smaller one as it has the higher mass, thus it has more momentum. Basic physics. And look at the crash test of a 2003 Dodge Ram crashing into a 2003 Honda Accord. The Accord does pretty good.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago 3
You are right, it will have more momentum, which is a GOOD thing. Because the vehicle will have more momentum, it will not de-accellerate as fast as a small car. This means YOU don't get bashed around as hard.
I saw statistics which show twice the number of deaths of people driving smaller cars than large american cars or trucks/suv's.
You are right that it's basic physics, too bad you aren't applying it correctly.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
But many new small vehicles are getting high crash test scores and big vehicles are not good as they make it worse for smaller vehicles when they collide with them. Imagine a Smart colliding with a Cadillac Escalade. What will be to the poor Smart? Big vehicles make the roads more dangerous for small ones. And more momentum means that the vehicle will take longer to stop. I agree that having a longer crumple zone helps, but big vehicles are not necessarily safer.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago 3
Yes, they do make it more dangerous for small cars, that is why I would never buy a Smart Car or a Honda Civic. Regardless of the crash tests, they are unsafe in the REAL world where big trucks and big cars drive.
You are right that it will take the vehicle longer to stop, I really don't care so long as I am alive. I don't care about the extra gas either, my family is worth it.
CAREXPERT69 3 years ago
You know what? Whatever. There really is no point in arguing with you.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
do you know why russian cars suck in crash tests? because they are really cars based on 45 year old fiat platforms. in those days, barely anybody thought about vehicle safety. i saw a crash test of a new, redesigned lada, if the euroncap rating system was used, it would have gotten 3 stars.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
10 stars? WTF
Wiishit23456withvids 3 years ago
bravo
ShaolinWarriors99 3 years ago
hey PPL what are these circles, yellow and black at the head of the dummie and all over???Allways wanted to know!!
HybrOMegA2 4 years ago
the yellow and black circles are used as reference points in slow-motion replays of crashes.
juanpablofx 4 years ago
what is the speed of this car when it crashed?¿? tell me please
anrisrain 4 years ago
35 mph...
PaperClip459 4 years ago
no 40...
blade7190 3 years ago
I own a Honda Accord 96 and got into a crash last week. I was going 50mph, the car crash as bad as in the vid (a little lesser I guess, the crashdeep not pass the front wheel) but it was total lost. The airbag worked good. Honda is fine!
ducluu 4 years ago
sorry about the crash :(
PaperClip459 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sux that you were in a crash. But seriously you would have been fine in any car. Don't let anyone fool you into thinking that their car is safer than everyone elses. That's just a marketing ploy use by Honda and others.
CAREXPERT69 4 years ago
you are retarded
PontiacDudeMan 3 years ago 5
I agree he is
FireOFK 3 years ago
Lol
PontiacDudeMan 3 years ago
alright smart one,LOL go buy that chinese brilliance thing, if you live to see another day after getting into a crash with that car.. ill pay you 100 bucks. crash tests are real, i mean, why spend sooo much money on something fake.?
USFCARTWRIGHT 3 years ago
yeah, that shit sucks. it is important to buy a vehicle with extensive safety features and good crash test scores.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
you've got to be joking! lol! no seriously???? you joking right?
cokacolla 3 years ago
lol.honda are good cars. i wonder if does the engine still start up?
alexlex85 4 years ago
how high is the speed of the car , when it splash into the wall ?
GreenD37 4 years ago
It "splashed" into the wall? Lol. Cars are usually tested at 40 miles per hour (64 kilometers per hour)
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
it looked like 5 miles per hour. that guy was just coming out of a parking lot.
mukulparkar 4 years ago
you retard, it's slow mo...
PaperClip459 4 years ago
you deserve to crash
soparamens 4 years ago
Man, you gotta hand it to Honda. Extremely good performance. The airbag deployed a bit early though.
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
DEATH to Honda
TornadoWarrior1 4 years ago
That area is supposed to deform in a crash.
valcom111t 4 years ago
too bad it's crap this car(built for americans). the european version is way better and i know cuz i drove em both
kurac3000 4 years ago
i agree
CAAccord 4 years ago
because is factory built by americans...
hatamakoto 4 years ago
Yeah, that's because the European Accord is the American Acura TSX, a bit unfair in comparison don't you think?
supergeek915 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why would it be unfair?
kurac3000 4 years ago
It's unfair because the TSX drives much better than any Accord. I know a lot of people say that the TSX is a glorified Accord but it's not. It is true that the engine DNA is very much like the US Accord, the TSX's engine has higher compression ratio (vs. 4cyl. Accord) and the suspension is stiffer; suspension alone will make the car feel much different.
supergeek915 4 years ago
the acura TSX is only called that in america, everywhere else they call it the accord. the US accord has a bouncy suspension, much softer power steering and overall has a much more cheap feel to it(typical for american cars)
kurac3000 4 years ago 2
yeah but even so the structure that was left after the crash wasn't even split. which was pretty impressive but what do you expect it's honda japanese.
HometownGuitar 5 years ago
35 mph is in-town driving, you tool.
SentryIII 5 years ago
35 mph is hardly realistic. 70-80mph would be - either motorway speed to standstill or combined velocity of two cars on a B-road...still safer than most though.
UKChris012 5 years ago
Its actually 40mph. Its designed for highway crashes. Because when you are doing 70-80mph, and a second later before hitting someone, assuming you know how to use the brakes you are doing 35-40mph. Thats for good cars.
SiL3333 5 years ago
what speed was that at?
britoca 5 years ago
excellent crash performance.
nikoloji 5 years ago
shit i needed that car
partycr 5 years ago
They make plenty Accords.
whattheheck1000 5 years ago
Thats amazing. No structural damage at all
Aragon159 5 years ago