National Right to Life: The Truth About Planned Parenthood

[ddoonnhh]

@galerouth

God bless you and thank God that your mother didnt hold the same position that you do!

[mgrant577]

@galerouth Hm, if you don't think that life and love are God-given privileges then you truly are sick. Marriage is not a contract! Marriage is love, at least at one time. You're basically saying that people marry with plans in mind to become divorced? What you call "reality" is what I call conformism and if you obtain your beliefs based of what other people think then I don't think your truly lead your own life do you? You are a conformist follower stuck with immoral beliefs and choices.

[mgrant577]

@galerouth Hm, if you don't think that life and love are God-given privileges then you truly are sick. Marriage is not a contract! Marriage is love, at least at one time. You're basically saying that people marry with plans in mind to become divorced? What you call "reality" is what conformism and if you obtain your beliefs based of what other people think then I don't think your truly lead your own life do you? You are a conformist follower stuck with immoral beliefs and choices.

[DeedsResearcher]

The real problem with pro-aborts is that they get trapped into their mentality, and 'think' they have a 'right' to end a human life, one that is incapable of self-defense. They go around demanding the UNLIMITED right to terminate innocent human lives, and then start demanding that we prove the innocence of the babies in the womb. It works the other way around. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt because there is a presumption of innocence. Preborns are not capable of crimes.

[lifeisaride94]

@DeedsResearcher The real problem is that sheeple believe the BS on this video and everything their church says. You do not think for yourselves nor seek the truth. The major flaw in your post is that you mistakenly believe us "pro aborts" are actually asking you to prove the innocence of something we do not believe to be a human life. You also forgot Original Sin, the myth all humans are not born innocent.

[DeedsResearcher]

@lifeisaride94 We do not think for ourselves? If anyone is being led astray, it is those who think that human life does not begin until after the moment of birth. Human life is a process. It ends at the moment of death. It must also have a beginning. Clearly, a baby is alive long before the moment of birth. There are measureable brainwaves and heartbeats long before birth. No Rabbi, Priest, or minister had to teach me that: it was self-evident!

[Lucky10279]

@lifeisaride94 Original sin is not a myth, but it doesn't mean that we are not born innocent.

[JuneV26]

How sad is it that we live in a culture of death, and our President has given over $900M to Planned Parenthood and its sister agencies, to make sure babies are killed. $900M can get us out of the financial mess we're in now. So why is our President being so pig-headed about this? Is he really that cruel? Or is it just that he wants to insure his votes for the 2012 election? We've seen the lies and the sins that go on behind the doors of PP. We have enough proof to shutdown every PP. Let's do it

[DeedsResearcher]

@JuneV26 It is also high time that we show our respect for life by supporting it via a Constitutional Amendment. Article 45 of the new constitution of Ecuador protects all human life "from the moment of conception". What a bold...and correct... position for that nation to take. It's just too bad we have too many pro-abortions thugs (a/k/a democrats!) sitting in Congress.

[DeedsResearcher]

@DeedsResearcher For the record, here is Article 45, as mentioned above:

Article 45. Children and adolescents shall enjoy the rights that are common to all human beings, in addition to those that are specific to their age. The State shall recognize and guarantee life, including care and protection from the time of conception.

"recognize and guarantee" are great words to use in this case. Too bad people like "g.r." have such sick ideas that they can terminate those lives.

[momperona]

This is a prime example of evil trying to disguise itself as being good for women. We must continue to expose PP's deceptive advertising and its sinister goals.

[ronpaulfreedom1]

Lets all move to Equador ..I have been voting on the prolife ticket sinse i was 18..I'm 50 now and no politician who has said he's pro life has done anything..Now we have even lost Our Constitution..The only person running for president that will repeal Roe verses Wade is Ron Paul a stricked constitutionalist..I want action now!!!..I'm voting for Ron Paul and if you want to change this then then you need to vote for Ron Paul too !!!

[DeedsResearcher]

@ronpaulfreedom1 Sadly, no president can overturn a decision of the Supreme Court. That's part of the 'separation of powers'. Only via a Constitutional Amendment such as Ecuador has can we overturn the horribly sick ruling of Roe. The lives of over 40 MILLION Americans have been terminated because of that ill-advised decision. This insanity must end!

[DeedsResearcher]

Outstanding video! Thank you, Carol, for bringing the FACTS to the table!

The new Constitution of Ecuador, Article 45, states as follows:"The State shall recognize and guarantee life, including care and protection from the time of conception."

This is a clear recognition that the process of human life begins at the moment of conception, when a new DNA is created, different from that of the mother. New DNA = NEW LIFE!

[MartinG200]

I meant to say both the pro-choice and pro-LIFE groups can pool their $

[MartinG200]

I hope for the day when abortion is gone. Then both the pro-choice and pro-abortion groups can pool their hundreds of thousands of dollars to help both the mother and her new child in trying to live a decent life FREE of guilt, regrets, denial and depression.

[bjfshs]

PP misleads youth by telling them only the perfect usage rates of contraception when adults don't even achieve perfect usage rates. The World Health Org. states that even with perfect usage rates (which doesn't happen) there would still be 6 million unplanned pregnancies a year.

Marie Stopes International admits that 21% of women seeking abortions were using 2 or more methods of bc at the time they got pregnant.

PP tells kids the condom is 98% effective and pill 99%. Criminal.

[galerouth]

@J

let's be honest, a fetus is not a baby and most abortions are done in early in the 1st trimester...so there's nothing to rip apart.

your federal taxes dollars are not going towards abortion, it's called the Hyde amendment.

"unborn children" doesn't exist in science and a woman's unwanted fetus is not your concern and most likely, you really don't give shit about her fetus anyways, as long as you are not financially responsible for it.

a fetus doesn't have a right to life.

[deadcell1]

@galerouth So basically your saying its ok to kill a unborn baby but not ok to kill another human being? A fetus doesn't have the right to life? You speak as if the baby is not even human.. By your definition when does this fetus turns into a baby (Human being). What bothers me the most is not your comment or the type of person you are what bothers me the most is that there is millions of more people like you in this world who carries the same mentality. What happen to good morals?

[galerouth]

@deadcell1

dumbass, unborn baby doesn't exist in science...it's an oxymoron and misnomer.

in reality, NO human has a right to life by use of another body against their will and legal rights, that's why you are not force to donate your kidney---the fetus is no exception, fascist.

so yes, you can legally kill a fetus, it's has no legal rights not be killed unlike most born ppl.

when did i say a fetus wasn't human?

what bothers me, that you support reproductive slavery of women.

[deadcell1]

@galerouth I don't support slavery of any kind. What I don't support however is poor decision making that placed that person in that situation to begin with. If a woman doesn't want to have children she either needs to use protection, contraceptives, or practice abstinence. Killing an unborn child is wrong in many ways regardless what you say and the junk media feeds you that you call TRUTH. I rest my case

[galerouth]

@d

U do...if U R for a fetus right to life, that means U R for forcing a woman to keep unwanted pregnancy against her will and legal rights.

it doesn't matter, how it began....U R support forcing your will on her against her will /legal rights.

your morality is has no legal power on her sex life, i can do a 50-men gangbang, get pregnant with triplets, then abort over and over again, until i have no uterus left.

there is no such thing as an unborn child. a fetus has no legal right to life.

[mgrant577]

@galerouth

You are one sick person. I can only imagine how dreadful your life must be. For a women to bring life into the world is a great privilege and responsibility. We must teach young people that sex outside of marriage is dangerous for all and potentially deadly for the unborn child.

[galerouth]

@mgrant577

i'm a sick person for living in reality and tell the truth that you don't like? grow up, child.

"For a women to bring life into the world is a great privilege and responsibility." then why are there so many abortions? logically, your opinion =/= fact.

you don't think abortions doesn't happen for married women? you seem clueless about reality, marriage is just an legal contract, it has nothing to do with love. there is no reason for marriage, anyways.

hint: the divorce rate.

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth "No reason for marriage"? Then you must support same sex marriage, which is clearly NOT a real marriage. Marriage is 1 man and 1 woman. Your posts define you as being more than a bit daffy.

[mgrant577]

@galerouth Hm, if you don't think that life and love are God-given privileges then you truly are sick. Marriage is not a contract! Marriage is love, at least at one time. You're basically saying that people marry with plans in mind to become divorced? What you call "reality" is what conformism and if you obtain your beliefs based of what other people think then I don't think your truly lead your own life do you? You are a conformist follower stuck with immoral beliefs and choices.

[mgrant577]

@galerouth Hm, if you don't think that life and love are God-given privileges then you truly are sick. Marriage is not a contract! Marriage is love, at least at one time. You're basically saying that people marry with plans in mind to become divorced? What you call "reality" is what conformism and if you obtain your beliefs based of what other people think then I don't think your truly lead your own life do you? You are a conformist follower stuck with immoral beliefs and choices.

[mgrant577]

Respond to this video... Awesome video!! Thanks for exposing the truth.

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth I have read and studied the Constitution for many years. NOWHERE in that grand document does it give ANYONE the so-called "right" to terminate innocent human lives, which is exactly what happens every time an abortion is performed. The process of a new life begins at the moment of conception. That process continues after birth, and all the way through one's lifetime. Proof? The child who is aborted has a DNA that is not the same as that of the mother. New DNA = New LIFE!

[galerouth]

@D

when did i say that abortion was in the constitution? wow, prove that a fetus is innocent.

abortion is constitutional because of the right to privacy and that fact that no human has a right to force another human into slavery (unconstitutional by the 13th amendment) to keep them alive, the fetus has no right to life...it's called the equal protection clause, DUH!

dna is not life, it's just protein.

and there's no child in the womb, that's scientifically impossible.

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth So you are part of the pro-abortion gang of thugs. How nice. The Supreme Court got it wrong. That is human life in the womb, like it or not. All of life is a process of change, from one day or week to the next. Some nags try to say that abortion is no different than removing tissue. However, a person's tissue has the same DNA throughout the body, while the DNA of the pre-born is different from that of the mother. NEW DNA = NEW LIFE. That life has a right to live. Case closed, MADAME!!

[galerouth]

@D

when did thugs actually cared about the civil and constitutional rights of others? and it's called pro-choice as we, respect the woman's rights to her own civil and constitutional reproductive freedoms, u fascist.

UR opinion that the scotus got it wrong, abortion was legal before roe= a fetus didn't have a right to life then.

who said the fetus in this human abortion debate, wasn't human?

U do know that DNA is just protein, right? U can buy some of it at the store.

dna= no right to life

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth No. Without DNA there can be no human life. The child in the womb, be it 1 day or a full 9 months after conception, is HUMAN LIFE, like it or not. That is the same child, just more fully developed at 9 months. Like the thugs on the forum, you do all you can to trivialize those lives.Maybe you should have been aborted? Huh? Say, 8 1/2 months after conception? That's "partial birth abortion", which your gang of thugs supports.

[scragsma]

@galerouth How is 'unborn baby' an incorrect phrase? After all, it occurs in every embryology text there is. "Fetus" is just a more specific term for a human being at a specific stage of development, just like "toddler" or "infant" or "teen" or "adult". At every stage of life a human being has an equal moral right to protection -- or do you hold that killing an adult is more wrong than killing an infant because the adult is more developed? That's the principle that you're trying to defend.

[galerouth]

@s

"unborn baby or child" is misnomer and oxymoron....babies are born.

it's not in the human development chart.

you don't have to be HUMAN to be a fetus.

"A fetus is a developing mammal or other viviparous vertebrate after the embryonic stage and before birth." wiki

"equal moral right to protection" that's your opinion.

your non-sequitur fallacies about the death of infants and adults isn't going to fly here.

fetus is a parasite, it has no legal right to life, your morality is not law

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth You come across as one of the gals I used to fight with in a forum on the internet. She used the same garbage lines as you are using. They had to be the most selfish beings on the face of the earth, always saying "ME, ME, ME " and "MY RIGHTS, MY RIGHTS". without giving a moments thought to the lives they were TERMINATING. Oh, Slavery ended during the 19th century. Carrying a baby to term is not now, nor has it ever been slavery. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!

[DeedsResearcher]

@galerouth Wrong. A fetus is simply a stage of human life. All of human life is a process with a definite beginning and ending. We know that it ends in death. Since it is obvious to everyone that the baby is quite alive before he or she is born, the only question remaining is 'when does that life actually begin?' Without conception there can be no human life, therefore, the entire PROCESS of human life BEGINS at the moment of conception, and goes through many stages before birth.

[galerouth]

@D

when did i say the fetus is this human abortion debate, wasn't human?

ABORTION IS A CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT SUPPORTED BY THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY, THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF 14TH AMENDMENT, AND THE 13TH AMENDMENT.

no human has a right to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constituti­onal rights.

that's why U R not force to donate your kidney---the human fetus is no exception.

fetus=/=baby

[galerouth]

@DeedsResearcher

"I've STUDIED the Constitution for MANY YEARS. NOBODY, but NOBODY has a "right" to terminate an INNOCENT... HUMAN... LIFE!... GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK HEAD, MADAME"

then prove the fetus is innocent and has a right to life at the expense of another, called reproductive slavery.

no human has a right to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constituti­onal rights.

[galerouth]

@D

pro-choicers say that because abortion is a civil/ constitutional right, the human parasitic fetus has no rights to life, and U want to FORCE a woman into reproductive slavery because of your own sanctimonious douche-baggery....U don't care about the fetus, when it's actual inconvenience you to.

no human has a right to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constituti­onal rights.

[galerouth]

so planned parenthood performs abortion...and your point is?

abortion is civil and constitutional right for women, it's their choice...pp is just doing supply n' demand, like every other business in the world.

no federal funding goes to abortion, it's called the hyde amendment.

[KnightOwl2006]

@galerouth Anyone literate in basic economics knows that money is fungible. Any money PP receives facilitates everything they do. Saying a government subsidy can only be used for one thing just frees up money for something else. It's like saying I'm only going to pour water into one end of the pool.

[galerouth]

@KnightOwl2006

what you don't understand is: NO FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS FOR ABORTION...IT'S CALLED THE HYDE AMENDMENT.

so logically, as long as no federal tax dollars are paying for abortions, it doesn't matter if that tax dollars frees up their money for something else.

[scragsma]

@galerouth Your last sentence is a commonly-repeated myth. The Hyde Amendment applies only to funding in one of the many funding bills Congress passes annually for the budget. There are other bills without the same restriction that freely pay for abortion. It's an outrage.

[galerouth]

@scragsma

no, it's you who are confused.

In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortions....The Hyde Amendment applies only to funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services. It primarily affects Medicaid.

so tell me what congress bill been paying for abortions.

outrage? be pissed at the million+ iraqis killed, you don't even care about the fetuses, anyways.

[BiggBen0077]

Well I guess if you ONLY look at the numbers of PPFA all alone then I can see where you are making your assumptions from... However if you hold those numbers up alongside the numbers of people unemployed and lost insurance coverage of the past few years it would only stand to reason that low income health centers would see a significant increase in patient numbers. Women who used to get their birth control through their health insurance but no longer have it would need PP's sliding scale rates.