Added: 4 years ago
From: m4c0me
Views: 114,296
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,262)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These images are totally consistent with the camera (mounted on the Lunar Rover) being canted at 14 degrees. When the image is canted, the centre of gravity of the astronauts is always through their base. The astronaut is not standing vertically, he is leaning forward with a 14 degree lean; the camera has a 14 degree cant and visually they cancel each other out and he merely appears to be standing vertically.

  • @spacecadet35 There's only one cant here. YOU.

  • I truly hope that these conspiracy myths are put to rest in the near future.

    I would feel deeply ashamed if some hoax types were still babbling about "flag waving fake lol" 100 years from now.

  • @Laurelindo They've been doing it for the last 35 years and they'll do it for another 100. They think it makes them look ohhh sooo smart.

  • Indeed standing wrongly.

  • The temperature on the moon varies from -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius), at night, to 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius) during the day

  • Memo to all shills and Apollogists, to include Astro and Phil and your latest protege aigg ( or are you extending yourselves with another Yt account-you'll be discovered ), I have not been defeated by any of you because you can't answer any of my questions.

    Explain how the actornauts managed to survive a round trip through the VA Belts and most importantly how rocket propulsion is possible in space. The last part might be tricky because Nosa states that space craft COAST to their destination....

  • @Chev4206 Fascinating.

    I suppose you can explain how geostationary weather and tv satellites perform stationkeeping, and exploration satellites are able to turn to face planets and other objects.

    Magic?

    Hey, tell me to fuck off again, that always works so well. Gives me a good laugh, anyway.

  • Comment removed

  • @Chev4206 What a plonker. Skunk-addled and stupid is no way to go through life.

    News just in "World of rocketry thrown into turmoil, when it was shown by a youtube divvy that Newton was wrong".

  • If these astronauts are taking photos then they will be using the standard issue chest mounted cameras. This means they have to stand in various attitudes plus the normal (ie vertical) attitude to capture what they want. No problems there.

  • @m4c0me "he should never be virticle because the camera is on an angle "

    He is leaning forward, as all the astronauts did, because of the weight of the plss. The tilt of the camera makes it look like he's standing upright.

    I would like to ask if you approve of foul-mouthed people like chev4206 representing your side.

  • @m4c0me First of all, the other guy was wrong about it being on the LM. It's on the rover and there are several such videos where the rover is on a slanted surface and the astronauts appear tilted. And what is it about filming this on the earth that would cause them to be tilted that way, if not the angle of the camera?

    By now, you must know you are wrong. No wonder you have made so few comments in the last year. Why don't you do the honest thing and annotate your video or take it down?

  • @Astrobrant2 This clip is from Apollo 15. Like 16 and 17, they landed in a valley floor surrounded by some very tall mountains, and they drove part way up a few to look around. (The view must have been amazing.) In this stop, they parked the rover so that downhill is to our left. Wonder why the hoaxers never give the mission time and station location, it's almost as though they know but don't want us to know.

  • i sometimes crouch forward and walk when my back hurts. or when i wear a knapsack while trying to walk across the beach. i wouldn't want to fall down when i trip over a rock!

  • Memo to the kiddy fiddler,

    I've asked you to stop stalking me. So stop it.

    I know a troll like you thrives on confrontation but you wont get it from me.

    Horrible being ignored, isn't it?

  • "Standing wrongly"

    Bye hoax theory:

    .

    watch?v=IeXUd8zuIcE&list=UU6RJ­4yyxaAjCw1ZPq19-T8A&index=1&fe­ature=plcp

    .

  • prosperomage, Regarding jumping, look at the video' Astronauts jumping,' they jump strraight upwards, no leaning to counterbalance the backpack weight, got to be wires involved there.

  • @thecubanism

    "wires"

    - Join Chev in high school. Come back in 2016 and try to provide some evidence for your theory.

  • Bye wires nonsense:

    watch?v=Tc7FLQR92eg&feature=re­lated

    .

  • @thecubanism -- And regarding jumping, I had a discussion on that subject a while ago.

    The photobucket site won't come up for me right now, maybe because of the network where I work. But I did a series of still-frames from the famous jump next to the flag, and the astronaut is leaning forward the entire time.

    In addition, the first time he jumps he gets slightly off balance and has to catch himself by stepping backwards.

    No evidence of "wires."

  • prosperomage, it may have been launched successfuly but it was unmanned, The Russian one was manned, if the US were so advanced how come the Russians got into space first?

  • @thecubanism, yes, Atlas launched successfully almost FOUR YEARS before Gagarin's flight.

    The U.S. has a very rigorous flight test and certification procedure for everything that flys, including space craft. Russia has a habit of rushing to be first, often bypassing safety.

    That's one of the reasons why the U.S. feels comfortable displaying every single launch of a space craft to the entire world while many Soviet failed launches weren't even known about until the Soviet Union dissolved.

  • @thecubanism, for a comparison between Russian and other flight certification procedures, look at one of their most famous commercial projects of the 1960's, the mainstay of their national pride in aerospace: The TU-144.

    After several crashes, it was discontinued after only 55 commercial flights while the British/French Concorde flew continuously for almost 30 years.

    (Boeing's SST was canceled by environmentalists.)

    The U.S. was never "10 years behind" Russia in anything regarding technology.

  • @thecubanism -- The U.S. SR-71 flew in 1964.

    No other country in the world ever put anything into the air that could even come close to catching it, including the Mig-25 FoxBat.

  • m4c0me's claim is very weak, and what's really going on is easily explained. Many Apollo pictures show that on a level surface the lunar astronauts leaned noticeably forward to balance the large PLSS mass on their backs. Here, the camera itself is tilted as they're on a slope. The giveaway is that the normal forward-leaning stance is gone only when the astronaut faces downhill.

  • @ApolloWasReal Still waiting for your answers Mr. Real.......

  • @ApolloWasReal Answer my questions you trolling cunt Phil.

    You're so pathetic you make my shit itch....

    Dumb fuck Ameriqueen

  • @ApolloWasReal Phil Karn you please answer my questions Mr. AWR?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @EmperorOfMars The first trip was Apollo 8 in 1968.

    The three-man crew of Apollo 8, Commander Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot James Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot William Anders, became the first humans to travel beyond low Earth orbit, the first to see Earth as a whole planet, and then the first to directly see the far side of the Moon.

  • @nagualchris2 "What about the gathering of moon rocks from Antarctica by Von Braun? What about the petrified wood given to the Dutch by Glen as a moon rock? etc"

    What about "etc"? What do you mean?

    Astronauts NEVER handed out moon rocks and John Glenn never went to the moon.

    There is no way von Braun could have found 800 kg meteorites. What "contradictory statements? They all say they went to the moon.

  • @thecubanism This is from the Apollo 11 post flight press conference. The question was when observing the Solar corona what stars did you see? Collins says he does not recall seeing any.

  • @thecubanism I have something better. Contact me

  • krisdevalle, You know who I mean, a senior moment, Cerman, satisfied pal.

  • Well, I am well into my cups by now but I have never seen anything which will convince me of the moon landings, I think it was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind, and while I am at it, as a national serviceman who served in the jungles of Malaya we have, on occasions, reunions, do these fakers have any? if they do I would to hear of them, , 6 landings times three. I think they prefer well paid privacy.

  • prosperomage, at the risk of sounding trite, what has size to do with it?, Germany was more advanced than the US in the space race and so was an impoverished country like Russia, admittedly a large country but in terms of wealth a poor country, but at least 10 years ahead of the US in the space race, suddenly America gets there!!!!, You may think it was possible, you may think it happened, but me, I look at people not possibilities and I ain't seen any plausible astronaught yet, sorry.

  • @thecubanism, If you think Russia was EVER "at least 10 years ahead of the U.S. in the space race" you are so seriously misinformed on the entire subject that you don't have the capability of judging anything about it at all.

    The Atlas booster that eventually took John Glen on America's first orbital mission was first successfully flown almost FOUR full years BEFORE Russia launched Gagarin on his orbital flight.

    The interim time was spent in a rigorous flight certification for project Mercury.

  • @thecubanism -- The ENTIRE so-called "hoax theory" is so completely based on such misunderstandings as "Russia was 10 years ahead of the US" as to make the so-called "theory" totally absurd in every aspect.

  • At the risk of being boring, why did Collins not see any stars? maybe I can dredge out of his bolt hole that name changing Yank Spreading the muse, is it , as a lot of you believers say 'Due to tiredness,  look at them seriously, a bunch of well-drilled liars,as I have said previously l have shown this and Gene Shermans interview to a detective friend of mine, his verdict, remanded in custody for further investigation, this is life not NASA propaganda.

  • @thecubanism Who is Gene Sherman?

  • @thecubanism Who is Gene Sherman?

  • @thecubanism One cannot see stars in outer space. Nosa says so.....

  • @thecubanism "At the risk of being boring, why did Collins not see any stars?"

    His statement, ":I don't remember seeing any," was in response to a question about whether or not they could see stars through the solar corona. Would that change what you're trying to imply?

    Of course, they saw stars during the mission. They used them to navigate.

  • @Astrobrant2 Bull-fucking-shit.

    It's absolutely astonishing how an educated (allegedly) person like you can subscribe to utter utter drivel and pseudo-science. Is it because you're stupid? Probably.

    Now Mr. Grunt kindly explain to the world how is it possible to navigate through space using the stars and so-called star charts. How can a three dimensional field of view be represented on flat paper? Don't tell me, its because your beloved Nosa says so.

    Pathetic.

  • @Chev4206 12 men have walked on the moon, buddy. Do you have any evidence that contradicts this reality?

  • @Cosmostrevor Do not try and get familiar with me, BUDDY.

    The evidence is everywhere, just remove the shit from your eyes and you'll see it.

    Now fuck off.

  • @Cosmostrevor Yes he has, its called swearing and name calling, what more evidence do you need? ;)))

  • @Cosmostrevor Yes. But what reality?

  • @Chev4206 Sailors from the old sailing ship days used the stars to navigate, no different to the Astronauts on Apollo, stars are too far away to be seen in 3d, they would not look any different from the earth, space or the moon, How did probes get to the moon and back? and of course they can see the target all the time, ancient sailors could not yet they made it, I would not even say you had any education, AB2 makes you look like a caveman.

  • @musicbruv Education? Read your shit bruv. Very very poor grammar.

    I reckon you went to school just to eat your dinners.

    Now fuck off

  • @Chev4206 Never mind grammar, lets me hear your evidence to support your moon hoax beliefs. did you go to school just to learn to swear? because that seems to be the only talent you have, why should a rocket engine not work in outer space? And what is a actornaut?

  • @musicbruv

    And what is a 'musicbruv'?

    A complete twat.

    Please fuck off, I'm getting bored with your idiocy.

  • @Chev4206 LOl avoiding questions.....sure sign of a loser who knows he is, typical hoax moron.

  • @musicbruv A loser of what exactly? For fuck's sake what are you batting on about?

  • @musicbruv Ask him this: if rockets can't work in space, then how do GPS, Sirius/XM and DirecTV satellites get up there? (I picked those 3 because, of course, even the densest hoaxer using one of their receivers can't deny that they're really up there). Then if you haven't already gotten him to go ballistic, so to speak, just ignore him.

  • Comment removed

  • @ApolloWasReal Why dont you ask me instead Phil?

  • @ApolloWasReal I cannot be bothered with him, he is on here just to be abusive to others, I think he is a no body in real life but wants to be a hard man but if he tries that to others face to face he will get a smack in the mouth, on youtube he is safe from that so he acts out his "I am a hard man" fantasy" his pretence of being dumb, i.e. rockets not working in space is just his way of getting a reaction, sad

  • @musicbruv Go fuck yourself little prick. You do not know who I am so stop making pathetic comments and threats.

    I see the trolls and shills have got to you.

    Shame......

  • @Chev4206 LOL...

  • A simple question, how could America have landed on the moon in 1969 and since then nobody,not Russia, or Japan, [who are American backed] or any other nation in the world have visited the moons surface?, when Roger Bannister broke the four minute mile he was immediately followed by John Landy and after that, thousandsof record breakers, moon landings, FUCK ALL, excuse my profanioty.

  • @thecubanism -- Very good question.

    Why is it that countries that, over the past 40 years, have been 1/10 to 1/4 the size of the U.S. not done exactly the same things as the U.S.?

  • @thecubanism Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 landed on the moon 1969-1972.

  • and did you see that dust shoot up in the air over were there heads where ? looks like it keep going up into space :)

  • It looks like the weight of his suit sagging :(

  • Dont call me buddy and try and get familiar with me you fucking pederast. Somewhere there is a hole, crawl in and hold your breath until you're blue in the face but dont stop there. Slit your throat and gently and quietely exsanguinate: there-more air for the rest of us.....

    But before you do us that favour check out my question. Do you really wish to go before you know the truth about your beloved fantasy? As a curious puff I reckon you will and then you'll stay for the ensuing arguments

  • @Chev4206 Cool story bro!

    You let me know when there's any substance to your argument.

  • @krisdevalle Tell you what, lets stick with the original.

    Just die....

  • @Chev4206 Awww. Chin up, sad sack.

    Here I was thinking you had something good.

  • @krisdevalle Do what you're good at. Troll the net and you'll stumble upon it. But be careful not to have your todger at hand, you'll pull it off ( unless your boyfriend hasn't done already ).

    Its so good you'll be gob-smacked why nobody, not even the Grand Master of Illusion Delusion Conceit Arrogance and Ignorance-Arsetrogrunt2.1, hasn't realised what I say.

    In the meantime go away, its embarrassing that you are stalking me like this. Dont you have shame? I reckon not.

    Poofter

  • @Chev4206 So coy!

    Oh well. Have fun, lady.

  • @krisdevalle You are a sick individuals.

    Psychiatric help is readily available, suggest you try some therapy. It might wean you off little kids, vulnerable boys and the will to live.

    Give it a try

  • @Chev4206 You do seem remarkably fixated on pedophilia and homosexual proclivity. It's all you seem to talk about. Something you need to get off your chest?

  • @krisdevalle If you were standing in front of me I would whack you in the face with a heavy cast-iron frying pan. Your comments are peppered with perverted homosexual innuendo suggesting its you who is a complete weirdo. I do hope kids in your neighbourhood are safe from predatory animals of your ilk.

    I am asking you nicely-stop stalking me and fuck off.

  • @Chev4206 I will when you stop talking nonsense.

  • @krisdevalle OK, you're not a poofter. That leaves kiddy fiddler....

    Even worse, yuk you fucking depraved debauched nonce.

    What are your intentions here?

  • @Chev4206 Intention one: Scientific debate.

    Intention two: Making you look like a reactionary weirdo who goes around accusing strangers of being a pedophile.

    You seem incapable of engaging in rational debate, so option two is my only recourse.

    You are certainly an easy target.

  • @Chev4206 krisdevalle, has it right...your a freak.

  • No one has yet explained why Collins didn't see any stars, is it because they can't, is that statement the smoking gun?

  • @thecubanism Neither. Collins was asked about seeing stars in the solar corona.

  • TheFACTSRUS, That is hardly an argument against my observation is it, come on laddy, be more precise.

  • @ettoremazza7 Try typing these words on GOOGLE: (ApoNNo Research Accepted THEIR view, held by the Minority, named Is that NOSA never sent astronauts to the Moon and never returned to Earth Them Safely - as never reported by the space agency, as not seen on TV and in the ApoNNo photos/shopped. )

    You're out of your league here sonnny boy. Telletubbies are calling you.

    Respond but comply or lie.......

  • vava54own, I'm sorry but I don't see the point of your recent comment, it neither offers a counter-argument, provides evidence or is informative in any way, are you sure you are not vulva54own?

  • Hey boys from my last drunken postings, no reply, have I at last struck a chord?

  • @thecubanism Contact me personally and you shall learn of the greatest ever proof that ApoNNo was a hoax. You won't believe it its so simple.

  • @Chev4206 What's the matter kid, too scared to post it online? I do hope it's got something to do with your retarded belief that rockets don't work in space.

    That's a funny one.

  • @krisdevalle I know that you may be some deranged kiddie-fiddler or pervert of some kind so don't call me kid. Be familiar with your fellow poofters by all means but not me, OK?

    Try trolling some more video sites and you'll find my magnificent observation. Your heart will skip a beat or two because your fantasy about ApoNNo is coming apart.......

  • @Chev4206 I can't really be bothered.Say it here it or go eat a dick.

  • @krisdevalle Sorry poofter boy. Are you a giver or a taker? Spitter or swallower? Whichever it is fuck youself away from me. Yuck, you could be a child molester-fucking sick cunt!!

    People like you, you know-perverts, ought to be euthanised. You make me puke.

    Fuck off, disappear and die.

    But first I suggest you find out my unimagineably simple nail in the ApoNNo coffin. You, your fellow Apollogists, Nosa and the Aponno bullshit fairy tale are doomed.

  • @Chev4206 Okay buddy. Maybe you should have a lie down. You seem worked up.

  • @Chev4206 Wow, you really are into some kinky stuff. Postings like this are why I would never need to resort to online dating.

  • @nas0ng Read all his postings dickhead. That creature's writing is peppered with sexual innuendo and teasing. I have no time for cretins like him or you for that matter so fuck off. Blocked.

  • @Chev4206 Yeah, I looked through a lot of his comments...yours are still more offensive/nasty and have less readable content.

  • @nas0ng Your point is....?

  • @Chev4206 That although I like your channel videos, your comments make you look like a troll. You rarely if ever contribute anything to a conversation of value. You give the wrong impression about yourself when your comments say: thick twat, poofter, dickhead, fuck off, bullshit fairy, child molester sick cunt!!, etc I would like to take you seriously because of your channel but I can't because of your postings.

  • @nas0ng I wouldn't say troll: I'm a Multi Video Observer and Commentator. I see it as a duty to visit these various sites where the bedroom experts reside, there are too many dickheads that go on an on and never answer a question properly. Stupid people deserve the ridicule they attract. I also know who some of the idiots are, but that's another story.

    I

    I

    I

    V

  • @nas0ng Lighten up for fucks sake and get a sense of humour. I don't take myself seriously, I'm here to wind up the lame-brains who believe in fairy tales.

  • @Chev4206 Not doing very well, are you?

  • @krisdevalle

    He's swimming in a swamp.

  • prosperomerage, that bastard didn't lean forwards, he jumped upwards, no change of body direction at all, no deliberate leaning forward to counteract backweight problens, are you stupid or what,? or is it me?

  • @thecubanism Yes it's most definitely your stupidity.

  • If anyone in their right minds sees this as authentic then I reserve the right to distance myself from the human race, it is obvious faked bullshit, like the 'Let me throw the hammer' shit, had they nothing better to do?, I judge people not facts and figures,, Aldrin, Armstrong, Collins, happy moon landers, NOT, Gene [sweating] Cerman, an obvious liar, and finally Collins 'I dont recall seeing any' stars that is. from an orbiter, give me a break,

  • krisdevalle Well as you are obviously a fucking retard did they jump in a different way? did they fuck, they jumped straight upwards clever cunt, and while you're at it you bullshittig bastard explain to me and millions of others why that faker Michael Collins didn't see any stars whilst orbiting the moon, no glare from the moons' surface in fact fuck all you fucking NASA brainwashed arsefucker, see my friend I can be obnoxious when it suits me but I tend to think it devalues my observations.

  • @thecubanism

    Lol youtube troll. You're so easy to spot.

  • I read a comment recently which stated that any astronaut jumping in one sixth gravity would, with that weight on his back, automatically come down on his back as his legs would lift up on leaving the surface, any comments?

  • @thecubanism Doesn't that depend on how they jumped? If your centre of gravity was markedly different, then you would jump differently.

    I know that if I were wearing a heavy backpack, and jumped, I wouldn't jump in the same way, unless I was a fucking retard. Now what about you? Would you jump the same way? Or would you be stupid and do it the same way as normal?

  • @thecubanism -- The direction that you make your muscles push determines which direction your legs go.

    What force would make them necessarily "lift up" unless the jumper were a klutz?

    If you have a weight on your back, you stand by leaning forward. Your center of gravity is over your center of pressure. If you jump while holding something, you just make sure the push with your legs is through the center of gravity.

  • krisdevalle, What a weird comment.

  • Guys think about it the Russians tracked the mission they woulda called us out on it in a heartbeat

  • Why didn't they film 11's lift-off, because that well drilled perfectionist Buzz forgot to turn the camera on, what, no check list? This is the same guy who stated 'we took off with a huge plume of flame and a cloud of dust' his head must have been out of the window to see that. That is the point I was trying to make, alcohol got in the way unfortunately.

  • @thecubanism Okay.

    So now you just devolve into weirdness.

  • Blahblobify, Thanks for you usual well thought out and reasoned answer, oh yes, I am very happy, happy that I can elecit such a pig-ignorant and completely over the top response, you must be a very sad and angry person, never mind, with that attitude the old heart attack is just around the corner. Something for me to look forward to.

  • krisdevalle, How can they have filmed apollo 11's take off when Buzz, in his book says that, and I quote, 'unfortunately I forgot to turn the camera on?' explain that one pal.

  • @thecubanism Good god dude.

    They didn't film Apollo 11's takeoff.

    Where's the footage?

  • @thecubanism

    They DIDN'T film Apollo 11's take off you stupid fuck shit.

    There's your explanation queer, haappy now?.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • TheSelfishAltruist, resorting to personal abuse not only shows a poverty of language it also seriously devalues your case, have a nice day.

  • krisdevalle, So, when Aldrin and Armstrong boarded the take off LM they positioned the rover to film them, they waited, I think, 18 hours before take-off, in that time they actually swithced the camera off and gave the signal for it to be switched on again exactly on cound-down time, well that is what it looks like, leaving it a little late weren't they?

  • @thecubanism No, the launch of Apollo 11 was never filmed, except from inside the LEM.

    Get your facts straight please. The only time the LEM launch was filmed externally was during Apollo 15, 16 and 17.

  • Thumbs up if you wish videos could be flagged for idiocy.

  • Moron CTs, Hollywood can't even do special effects this good today, much less in 1969.

  • Is the camera being controlled from Huston?

  • @thecubanism Yes. During missions 16, 16 and 17 the lunar rover was mounted with a TV camera that was controlled via radio. This freed up both astronauts to do work instead of having to handle a camera. Ed Fendell was the controller and if you wish to see more about the camera, simply google for 'cameras of apollo' It should be the first link.

  • A very good example on the hoax believers lack of understanding of basic physics and photography. The camera is just leaning. Everything looks just as it should.

  • Musicbruv, To be quite honest, I don't really know what it is, the whole thing fails to convince me, it is, well, lacking something, authenticity maybe?

  • simulation fall ?

  • idk2say, Name calling only weakens your case my friend.

  • idk2say,

  • musicbruv what do you mean this was filmed in Huston, don't you mean it was filmed in the Nevada desert?

  • To be quite honest, I'd like to believe it happened but it all looks so staged and false, if they did go to the moon, these are not the images they broadcast back, it is obvious that it is a staged set, as I have said previously, if that was a Hollywood movie it would be laughed out of the theatre, it is like the early Bond movies with cardboard sets and dodgy effects, don't believe it, never will.

  • @thecubanism If you think it was staged then please explain why you think it was staged. What is so obvious?

  • Are you kidding me, 'Frame number Dave', then repeated by NASA at the same time as Dave's comment, explain that one.

  • It's been mentioned before but deserves to be mentioned again. The rover is parked on a sloped surface, so the camera, (mounted on it), is tilted. There are other videos which show even more tilt than this one.

  • @Astrobrant2 Bull-Fucking-SHIT, and you know it!!

  • @Astrobrant2

    Ignorant conceited beliefs belong to people like you. You are stuck in the past and desperately clinging onto your ApoNNo fantasy which is falling apart daily. Perhaps you and Phil (AWR) should join together and produce some videos for our televisual entertainment. They would be cracking comedies.

    When will real astronauts travel in a real craft and land on the real Moon? They tried it 40 years ago with actornauts in a wheelie bin in nevada and it was quite shit.

  • @Chev4206 Since your comment is nothing but a personal attitude rant, can we assume that you now realize that the camera was tilted, not the astronauts, and that this is just one more in a long list of failed "proofs" that Apollo was faked?

    Must be frustrating, having your precious conspiracy theory debunked at every turn. Since it's impossible for people like you to admit that you're wrong, I take some pleasure in your frustration.

  • @Astrobrant2 I don't give a fuck if the camera was tilted or not!! Is this how you spend your days examining insignificant 40 year old rubbish? Fuck me, get a life old man.

    Me frustrated? NEVER....

    WHEN WILL REAL ASTRONAUTS TRAVEL IN A REAL CRAFT IN REAL SPACE AND LAND ON THE REAL MOON? Now who is frustrated because the question cannot be answered? But its a perfectly viable one so give it a try. Oh, did any actornaut still have their appendix intact during the disney moon missions? Hmmmm.

  • @Chev4206 Nah, you don't sound frustrated at all. [snerk]

    "Oh, did any actornaut still have their appendix intact during the disney moon missions? Hmmmm."

    Very interesting question. Please, tell me more. Show us how that in any way undermines Apollo. Show your ignorance again, so you can get frustrated again and make more nasty attitude rants.

    Fun fact: people going to Antarctica for months-long tours of duty have to get their wisdom teeth removed.

  • @Chev4206

    "I don't give a fuck"

    - Of course you don't. You are one of these hoax nuts in the simpleton and high school drop outs category that says: "I don't understand it, so it must be fake"

    .

  • @Rob260259 Yeah yeah yeah Mr. Fucking Expert.

    Whats there to understand numb-nuts? I do understand that ApoNNo is one of the biggest world-wide hoaxes ever inflicted on a gullible public. Thankfully people like me realise what a blatant lie it was and I shall always give apollogists the derision they deserve for being so fucking stupid.

    Whats the weather like today in The Netherlands?

  • @Chev4206

    "people like me"

    - hahahaaaa!

    Try to find one ounce of evidence that supports your theory.

  • @Rob260259 What theory Dutch boy?

  • @Rob260259 He doesn't "give a fuck" only after his dumb belief has been debunked.

  • @Chev4206 I don't know if they still had their appendices. Apparently this is something you have researched and consider important. Stop teasing me! The suspense is unbearable. Drop your bomb. (And give the source).

  • @Astrobrant2 Yes Mr. Grunt it is very important. Think about the implications of a medical emergency so far from home? You're as pathetic and feeble as your beloved Nosa.

    What about the star charts old man, come on and answer me.

    Nothing I have suggested has ever been debunked because you, Rob and Phil K have never properly answered a question. It's because you do not have the answers.

  • @Chev4206

    You really don't know much, do you?

  • @Rob260259 Yes I do you Dutch ocp cunt.

  • @Chev4206

    Google REFSMMAT.

  • @Rob260259 Complete rubbish.

  • @Chev4206 Your do not listen or understand that is why YOU think nothing has been de-bunked because you cannot think for yourself.......medical emergency....tough, hazard of the job.

  • @Astrobrant2 Please explain the following, if you can.......

    1) How is rocket propulsion possible in outer space

    2) How did they manage to travel to the Moon in a wheelie bin strapped to a giant firework

    3) How did the PLSS packs provide hours of breathable air

    4) Why do identical backgrounds appear at different landing sites

    5) Did any actornaut have his appendix intact during the disney films

    6) How did boiler suits and gardening gloves protect them from radiation and temperature

    7) Etc etc

  • @Chev4206

    1) Renders you a complete idiot.

    2) Etc etc.

  • @Chev4206 Question 3 is the most intelligent question you have asked, question 4 may deserve an answer, the rest let you down badly and show you have no argument to support your belief so you resort to childish rants.

  • @musicbruv "Question 3 is the most intelligent question you have asked"

    Yep, a good question -- offered, of course, under the assumption that such a thing would be impossible. I found the answer in 20 seconds.

  • @Astrobrant2 Plus those PLSS use a rebreather-style setup, which is of course the same reason deep-sea divers can also breath underwater for hours on end. Chev is on the wind-up, but he's just not that good at it.