Added: 1 year ago
From: Games
Views: 182,091
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (630)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Plataforms: Family Game xD

  • Platforms : PC

  • @ScreamGhostFace12345 and Wii U ;)

  • the girl looks pretty fuckable

    the engine looks pretty lickable

  • Shit, that's the program that made Crysis 2, isn't it? I love that game! Be the weapon! :D

  • doesn't xbox 360 works with the cryengine 3?

  • @yinon500 xbox can run a very dumbed down version of cryEngine 3 so EA and crytek can milk the franchise with a CoD rip off. Crysis should have stay on PC and reach it's true potential and become a real game.

  • @yinon500 ? What do you mean by that? If you're asking what game works with Cry engine 3 well that crisis2,But from what i know is using a down graded version of the Cry Engine 3 because the GPU in the Xbox360 was not strong enough to support the full capabilities of the Graphical engine.And if you're asking if CryEngine 3(the company) works with Microsoft in helping improve the Xbox to support the fully capabilities of the Graphical engine,well that i don,t know.

  • wtf!!!! :O m playing crysis 2 but i dont know about cryengine 3!!!

  • OK Nice ! Now i need just a better PC ! xD

  • What I was very dissapointed about is the fact that there is no map editing for Crysis 2. There was for FarCry.

  • @N7Normandy1 dude, the cryengine 3 SDK has been out for at least 3 months now. check crydev

    

  • i get an adrenaline pumping boner watching this.

  • I For one cant see how you can compare the engine awesome of power by its speed or the amount of gpu power it needs. You can have a very badly programmed engine that cant run 800X600 at 60hz and maxing a GTX 580 at 20fps. Or you can spend moths even years to make an very well written engine that can not only run almost perfect real time graphics at 60+ fps. Plus some times it simple things that make a game look good. Some times just having better base art in the game can make it look good.

  • Powerful engines of 2011:

    Frostbite 2

    CryEngine 3

    Unreal Engine 3

    Not by order of awesomeness

  • I need this engine. Mainly because I need simple 3D models that look real so I can make my live action films include Helicopter's Tank's Cinematic explosion's and more. However I would be running it on a laptop so it I don't think it will run. BTW in case I get a better computer, how much will the engine cost?

  • Comment removed

  • @TheWeid0Group Simple models = simple look.

    You need photo realistic textures, normal maps, specular maps etc. too, to make that look sweet.

  • heres my theory...if u make it more shaky it look a lot more realisstic cuz this is too clear and even though it has all the aspects needed to look real everyone knows that nothing can be that still especially when the camera a.k.a screen is moving and the anime object is still clear.

  • So this is how the make Transformers lol

  • lol he has a pimp car now :D

  • You are looking at footage for next gen systems

  • cryengine 3 sucks! to low for a actual good pc!

  • @DeadCry1000 You realise that cryengine 3 is now the most advanced game engine? You do realise that the engine that battlefield 3 is made on is only half as powerful as cryengine 3? Crysis 2 was not fully done on cryengine 3 because it would require a supercomputer to play it with more than 16GB allocated memory RAM and a graphics card so powerful not yet invented? Mwuahahahaha!

  • @ITDom4

    depends who uses it. if crytek makes their own games with it, yes it rocks, some indi dev uses it and has no experience with the toolset no it would suck ass lol.

  • @cyansn0w Yeah, true :/ It would be awesome though to get the makers of cryengine and unreal engine, would kick ass :P

  • cryengine 3 + unreal engine 3 = epic engine :D

  • Pretty believable once you see the working tools in action, huh?

  • you guys can use the software you know 

  • The engine is just a template,its up to the artist what he makes of it,but then he is limited to the amount of polygons he can use.a bad looking game isn't the artists fault its the limitations he has that make his job harder.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Great engine but too bad you barely see any game using it.

  • @zidan40o0 3 games using it now

  • @richie2801

    Exactly my point, look at UE3 , I can easily name you ten games which is using it and intend to use it.

  • I can do that with bge

  • @One4TheTechnoGuy Yes sniper ghost warrior 2 is going to use the engine

  • w are gonna show of the worlds best egnine in 720 lol

  • @lolmanprod unreal engine 3 tops this easily

  • @theclockmace not really

    

  • @richie2801 this engine seems to do very well with environments. but in this demo looking at the RC Warthog ripoff its looks like something out of a game i played back in my PS2 days. unreal 3 seems to excel in all category's environment, faces, objects, resolution etc..

  • @theclockmace lol with a youtube video you cant see the difference exactly, have you ever played crysis 2 in DX9 and then after the patch in DX11?? the unreal engine is a good dx11 engine too but cryengine 3.0 sandbox is easy to use and you can make much more as seen in this little sequenz, only frostbyte engine 2.0 beats both of them with partikel,shader and light effects,seen in BF3,Need for speed the run and now they work on Dead Space 3...

  • @richie2801 frostbite 2 isn't really all that great. I have BF3 and although lighting is incredible a some parts just feel old.

  • @theclockmace you forget the fine tesellation and destroying shaders.... :-)

  • I left a tear for the lack of 1080p quality. ;)

  • how come nobody has done a game with such cool environments?? that forest looks amazing : O

  • why make a game engine that nobody is going to use? People are already making games with the new Frostbite 2 engine, and people are already using the new ID game engine for pray. I haven't heard anything for the new Unreal engine. I am assuming that developers are using it for the new consoles that are coming up in 2 years.

  • @WallyWadeMovies batman arkham city is with this engine :-)

  • @richie2801 I wouldn't be surprise if they did, because before the game starts you see tons of softwares programs they use. But they do feature "POWERED BY UNREAL" on it. So i dont know how they would use Cryengine on batman

  • @WallyWadeMovies sorry i mean crysis 2, cabal 2

  • @richie2801 Arkham Asylum and Arkham City are on Unreal Engine 3. :V

  • Bet kootra loves this

  • they make it really strong, then dub it down for consoles, ruining the entire engine

  • imagine a fantasy game made with this graphics and the possibilites they would have, would be totally amazing. hope more companies gonna try to use this engine.

  • @EvilMochii there is actually a korean company making a mmorpg with this engine :D

  • @shamkuzi yeah i played aion it looks amazing, but they made it with cryengine 2 lol

  • @EvilMochii im not sure which one of those engines are the best but both of them looks nice, i guess crysis 2 didnt show the full potential of CE3

  • como faço esses videos ? no 3d max ! Passa pra mim ? essa imformação ? meu MSN ::: leandrao.333@hotmail.com

  • Link for Download?

    OWEIOWEIOWEIWOEIWOE'

  • me: woah look at these graphics

    my friend:...thats a window

  • THUMBS UP if you want Need For Speed with this engine

  • @atnanasatnanas hahah need for speed is dead since hot pursuit

  • I want to see movies made on game engines.

  • I have download the Free CryEngine3 and i can open it but its an keylogger on the folder so dont download it its a great engine but theres a Keylogger!

  • Can you get CryEngine 3 for free?

  • @g0atballs yes, go to crydev.net :)

  • @g0atballs

    Yeah, you can download it for free.

    I did it on the official site of cryengine: crydev(.)net, take a look there ;)

  • they should use this game engine to make a cool futuristic sci fi game with awesome huge landscapes. That would truly show off the engine. They never have any creative scenery in crisis.

  • Amazing

  • Dear Crytek

    In 2009, you promised us that you would develop Timesplitters 4. Well, 2 Years have passed and there is no sight of it, we the gamers demand that you create Timesplitters 4. In 2000, Timesplitters 1 came out, it was Epic!. Then in 2002 Timesplitters 2 cam out, it surpassed the first game in ways I can't type. Then in 2005, Timesplitters: Future Perfect was made and it was enhanced so greatly. Well 6 Years have passed since the last Timesplitters game, we the Gamers demand it!

  • Cant wait to see what Mechwarrior Online will look like knowing they are using this engine.

  • my graphics card would poop if it has to render such visuals

  • When it says for cinema... does that mean its meant to make movies with? Does that mean.... a Crysis movie? :D

  • @IBCRUZINx yes :P you can create 3d animated movies with 3d engines, just like pixar are doing with say toy story :)

  • Unreal engine. Absolutely destroys Cryengine 3

    .

  • @henry1234134 i used to be a troll like you... than i took an arrow in the knee.

  • @henry1234134

    Unreal - More Fantasy alieny gobliny stuff

    Cry - Futuristic military stuff

    Frostbite - *facepalm*

  • If somebody ported samaritan tech demo on cr3. maybe it won't needed for using triple-sli gf580 to do similar graphics.

  • damn, i wish skyrim was made with this engien :(

  • @christi1992 u just gave me an idea what to do with my sdk kit

  • Achieved with Cryengine 3.

  • CryEngine 3 dominates any game engine, Frostbite was fully utilized in BF3 that's why you see huge landscapes and phenomenal physics. However CryEngine 3 wasn't in Crysis 2, they just used a fraction of its power so that it could work on more PCs. However if you were to fully utilise this engine, well it doesn't get any better.

  • SHIT

    he's using Maya

  • wonder wow :D

  • Unreal 3 is good for games like Batman , Gears & Borderlands.

    But CryEngine 3 is a little bit better than Frostbite 2.

    But it seems anyone is forgeting about idTech 5 which is a great engine and could very well be equal to Cryengine 3 and Frostbite 2

  • textures suck, grass susks, ground sucks, cryengine3 sucks.

  • @temp666full I used to be an idiot like you...but then I took an arrow in the knee.

  • I still think Unreal Engine 3 looks the best. The Samaritan tech-demo is amazing.

  • @GuyWithBluePoop You'll never see a game running in real time with Unreal Engine.

    However this is running in real time.

  • @SOF006 The Samaritan tech-demo is real time. I'm not even going to argue whether or not it is real time, because it is.

  • @GuyWithBluePoop No, you didn't even read my comment. You'll never see a "game" running in real time with Unreal. However with Cryengine 3 you always will see it running in real time.

  • Until i get hands-on experience with Frostbite 2, Cryengine 3 wins in my book, Unreal 3 falls short though :/

  • heres how i think it goes correct me if im wrong Cryengine 3>Frosbite 2>Unreal Engine 3

  • @97SeattleBoy I think its Frostbite2>Cryengine3>Unreal Engine 3

  • If someone would make like a helmet with screen, that real life ball thingy suits and guns with those ball thingies, Holy Shit! Imagine the gameplay!

  • Is this better than unreal engine 3 or frostbite2?

  • holy cow

  • That not was beauty graphics.. that are the graphics

  • hey guys,

    i don't know how to create a characters.

    is there a place where i can download soldiers,vehicles and other stuff like that?

  • WTF is this bollox! Cryengine 1 was the best - Cryengine 2 looks the best - Cryengine 3 is full of fancy lighting and shadow effects, but looks like crap!!!

  • @davehowellman shadow and lighting is what makes it way more realistic. in honest opinion, if they got that perfect, you'd think its real.

  • @SVD151k Completely agree about the lighting! But IMO the resolution and texture mapping just looks really fuzzy and gives me a headache! The original Crysis does not have the same "realistic" properties. But I think over the next ten years we're going to see an argument develop over what looks more realistic and what looks better!

  • the wheels looks kinda shitty.

  • @xxxaero there tires dude, there not supposed to look fantastic.

  • My computer will run this in about 10 years if my income don't increase.

  • goes 3 fps on a 500000 GB system with 999999999 GHz processor :P

  • 7 peoples like World of warcraft :/

  • so BF3/frostbite 2 and Crysis 2/crytek 3 are the most realistic engines/games out there?

  • @EDDIEinWAR Engine is called CryEngine 3, not crytek 3. Also engine does NOT make game realistic. Shaders do, which are just maths. Say thanks to mathematicians to have that.

  • 7 personas no tienen cabeza para pensar... ( 7 people have no head to think )

  • And this is CryEngine 3 ?? The same CryEngine that we can download ??

    Nooo... Its a joke right ?!

  • so they made a fancy penis pump, big deal

  • It's a shame that the only game made with this so far is Crysis 2 which is set entirely in a city... no cool landscapes like KZ3

  • @joey3491 well thats because its rather new. Beautiful landscapes are way easier to make in cryengine 3 then a city so crysis 2 basically demonstrated that they can take their engine even further.

  • @joey3491 Far Cry and Homefront will be using CE3

  • @Josh350 Farcry is not made by Crytek anymore. It is made by Ubisofts montrial studio. They do not have the rights to CryEngine and use the Dunia Engine. Though Homefront 2 will be great. With the improvements in graphical technology by 2014, I expect Crytek to use the full power of current PCs since it will most likely be on Next Generation consoles.

  • @joey3491 Ubisoft is using the Cryengine. They make these engine for development companies not just for themselves.

  • @joey3491 The new Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 runs on CryEngine 3 and that has some amazing landscapes

  • @joey3491 They haven't taken full advantage of CryEngine 3 with Crysis 2.

  • @tazss159 sure they did. the CryEngine 3 is a worse version of the CryEngine 2, because ps3 and xbox are to slow to handle CryEngine 2.

  • @tazss159

    Do you have any idea how powerful computer you would need for that?

    These here aren't even ingame demonstrations. They are just renders.

  • @simpsoncheat You mean it would take an insanely powerful computer to run CryEngine 3 at it's highest potential?

  • @tazss159

    Well. Not insanely. But if you would want to make fully detailed realtime renders into a game and not degrade the quality at all. It would take a pretty powerful computer.

    Plus you would need to do some coding since rendering and game making are separate things so you need to modify the render engine to be different.

  • @simpsoncheat I'm sure a GTX 580 could do it.

  • @tazss159

    You would also need a pretty powerful CPU. I would suggest something that has atleast 4.5Ghz.

    And you need a great amount of RAM.

    So it would have to be a custom built PC.

  • @simpsoncheat Your overestimating CryEngine 3. A GTX 580 and a i7 2600K would easily run it, and that's not an "insanely powerful computer".

  • @tazss159 they didn't take full advantage of Frostbite 2's engine in BF3, not saying it's better than Cryengine just saying i don't know why they do that :/

  • @Dr8co1 Frostbite 2 is more graphically advanced then CryEngine 3. The reason they might not have taken full advantage of Frostbite 2 with Battlefield 3 is because we don't have GPU's with enough power to run Frostbite 2's maximum potential. If Frostbite 2 uses full Global Illumination algorithms, then we need 100 times the power of a GPU like the GTX 580 to run Frostbite 2 at it's maximum potential.

  • @joey3491 A new sniping game is coming out soon - forgot the name, but it runs ce 3.

  • mind = blown

  • All I can say is damn.

    Good stuff here.

  • at 1:30 I still thought they were rendering everything int eh engine then I noticed it was in real life stuff...

  • @Sgtbobtwo I noticed it was different immediately, because real life looks worse

  • I wonder if they use Atom graphics or polygon c:

  • it's a turkish programmers power...

  • i think they r gonna make a crysis 2 movie with cryengine 3 for cinemas

  • the only problem it's that this engine is only for cinema and not games like the normal cryengine 3 -_-"

  • @Marclo26 Its real time man!

  • @TheOsFoda yes i know even cryengine 2 (cryengine 1 i am not sure) has real time but here is realy improved ^_^

    Crytek rulz

  • Comment removed

  • how is even possible for graphics to get any better than this

  • i bet rockstar use this engine for GTA 5

  • Oh god I want to sandbox this shit!

  • if we have this in 2011 we will have in 2014? :S

  • if you have a good computer you can watch the sunset from your own home :D

  • very beautiful (L)

  • overkill...

  • @EvSubstance

    anyway it looks nearly better then rl xD

  • CryEngine 3 IN crysis 2 with patch 1.9 and HD Texture is a lie... is nothing like this video. This video shows better textures, reflexions, effects, etc.

    I think Crysis 2 uses some Cryengine 2.5 or something like that

  • @EvSubstance No it's just because they were limited to the hardware of consoles, if crysis 2 was first made for PC and then downscaled to consoles it would have looked a lot better.

  • @EvSubstance

    its a cinematic all graphics engines have a much better graphic in cinematics, cutscenes or demonstrations

  • @salza13 its not a cinematic, its part of the real CE3 for PC. Like jolichja said, Crysis 2 engine is downscaled from console, so basically Crysis 2 is a port.

  • @EvSubstance The entire Cryengine 3 has been pretty much downscaled. Don't get me wrong for real time graphics and considering Cryengine 3 doesn't require monster specs like Cryengine 2, it's pretty beast. But I still think Cryengine 2 DX10 is one of the greatest looking graphics rendering engine I have seen in awhile but it's also been around a lot longer. Only time will tell who's the champ.

  • @malicios Cryengine 3 HAS NOT BEEN DOWNSCALED AT ALL.Yes,maybe it requires lower-end hardware , but dont forget that IT ALSO SUPPORTS DX11!

  • @salza13 Not true. Just because it's a "cinematic" doesn't mean it's better. You forget this is REAL TIME not some precooked ingame video fool.

  • 1:46 cross your eyes to see the awesomeness

  • Cry engine 3, better graphics then real life.

  • Anyone else notice when the girl is walking in the woods, her fingers aren't animated?

  • Beautiful background music too!

  • rember the games from 1995?Good old times.The better graphics ever

  • Frostbite is better

  • @ShovelHorse no it isn't

  • @kyleisreallycool As you say but look at Battlefield 3

  • @ShovelHorse Keep telling urself that kid you will get laghed at for being ignorant.

  • It make cool graphic new games

  • I hope they made call of duty modern warefare 4 for xbox and ps4 that would be insane it will blow your mind if that happen that will be real time graphic cant wait even fishing 2012

  • @emsudboskovic uhhh i think COD will remain a crappy graphic unrealistic cash cow forever

  • @emsudboskovic COD can blow me.

  • this is better then real life

  • fuck me i thought the first scene was a real video