Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you should tag your videos better for more views, like: quantum science mechanics science,, cant think of more :)

  • @wyCerBotMyNem Thanks for the suggestion. I will update the tags ...

  • As I recall, there was even a school of thought the perceived geometrical patterns to be proof of god. The reasoning was that geometrical forms were perfect, and this perfection reflected god's perfection. In this case, the misuse of the relativistic term 'perfect' to define something that has never been quantified is doubly unfounded by association with something equally subjective in nature.

  • Religious beliefs are psychological in nature, requiring the believer to accept, as true, things which are not, or which cannot be, proven. All inconsistencies are ignored by believers. Believers frequently base their beliefs upon emotions (what they feel to be the truth), which makes the subject utterly unquantifiable. At one stage, it seems that people used the term 'perfect' to define god. 'Perfect' is relativistic, and a meaningless term if used without comparative references.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more