Obama is full of shit. As a TCK, you could care less about the "teachers". You just want to understand what the fuck it means to be entitled, like Americans feel.
@MinGophers - Are you a Third Culture Kid (TCK)? Is the job of every teacher to make children feel "special"? I was under the impression it was their job to effectively communicate skills. With regards to self-esteem and other froo froo bullshit, I thought that's what parents were for.
@englanddg When was that EVER discussed in our only 2 messages prior to that?
I agree wholeheartedly with that. But your first message? Fail... And in a sense...so is your second message since you begin to make odd accusations based on misreading only two 2 messages.
I mentioned TCK, I also mentioned the role of teaching people to feel entitled or otherwise "special". My comments haven't changed...perhaps I communicated them poorly.
Hillary Clinton is the eldest of three and has two YOUNGER brothers. I think this is the reason why she is so powerful. We need more Hillarys and (Meryls, who is of the same birth order) don't you think? So if your first child happens to be a girl, and your second child a boy, then have a third child. Hopefully he is a boy.
Barack Obama deliberately and repeatedly lied to America's 90 million gun owners when he insisted that he would not try to take away anyone's firearms.
Call Senators and Congressmen today,1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOU'RE OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to take guns away!
CALL PRESIDENT OBAMA, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414
It has been stated and proven that there are a LOT of U.S. investments in this. It all adds up and there is too much evidence for it to be mere coincidence.
You guys invaded a country on a LIE!! But the good thing is that this country was run by a despot wich wasn't very popular in the U.S.A. . Iran on the other hand should have been the target. We know they are building WMDs, we know they are dangerous. North Korea's the same. It has been known that Kim Jong Il had WMDs even before the Iraq invasion. But unfortunatly, North Korea doesn't have any oil. By the way, a pipeline is being built between Turkey and Koweit .
Thain, do you realise that you are pro-war? Your country was attacked in 9/11. Bin Laden and the talibans were the target. They are funding terrorist groups from all around the world. But what boggles me is why in the hell did the Pentagon deemed Osama as an obsolete target and decided to go after Iraq instead. If Iraqis wanted a different form of goverment they would have overthrown Saddam anyway (and were in the process of doing so).Otherwise a country minds its own buisness.
thain456: Man, a lot of hostility coming from you. If you met me in person you would quickly realize that I am no tree hugger. Go play on the highway and allow adults to continue a rational discourse. Better yet, ask your mom to you to the ice cream truck. They have your favorite flavor. "Tutti Fruiti".
This question helped us to see the canidate's characters. By seeing what educational experiences are important to each canidate, we can see how they will be swayed on future decisions. Each canidate can make up anything you want to hear about the "big" issues, but we can really see the canidate's true colors by personal questions like this.
How is this question relevant to the major global problems we have today. I mean it's great to learn about the candidates past but we have a crisis in our hands that we need to solve.
thain456: Dude, at least be a part of the discussion. Cursing and being irreverant is a sign of lack of intelligence (at the very least) or, a cry for attention. Which is it? IMPEACHMENT NOW!
gjohnson87109, sounds like you need the attention dickhead.... get off the impeachment thought..... it isn't happening.... so go hug a fucking tree asshole.
WHat happened to the "Impeachment Questions"? I could care less about the candidates favorite teacher. What a lame and useless question by itself. Couple this question with education reform and this would have been an appropriate question. CNN you get a big fat "F""!
dogbreath, read the regulations on wiretapping you'll be glad they did..... for your protection. Torture.... you call that torture? Okay, I don't agree with the way that was handled but is it an impeachable.... not. Torture has been going on before Bush. WMD.... with out question he had the means to produce them and had used them in the past.... think about the threat with the Harp project. Ties to international terrorism..... yes Saddam did.
No, no, no.. please educate your self. Wiretapping is supposed to be handled by court order, not by what the police "feel" is right - think about the personal agenda problem. Torture is against the constitution, totally impeachable. And he did NOT have WMD's and he actually faught Osama! They hated each other.
Visfen, court ordered for international calls.... yeah thats a good waste of tax dollars for you. Police... don't you mean the computers at NSA? If you call that torture you should have seen what Saddam did.... but go ahead quote the constitution for me. He did not fight Osama.... dork and he did not fight against Ansar al-Islam because they were killing Kurds. Any other questions school boy?
So you don't think we have a right to privacy? And wiretapping and Echelon is different... So what, if I shoot you in the head, and I am one of thousands of your enemies then you can shoot everybody in the leg? Who gives a shit what Saddam did, like the US should ever take after that faggot. Get real, Osama hated Saddam and Saddam hated him, even the 911 report states so.
Visfen, yes.... of course..... the problem is that the world has changed my friend... thank an Arab for that. Quote the constitution on torture you brought it up..... but if you call that torture you don't know what is.... if you compare it to Saddam I would call it just humiliation. Also, it is a known fact even pointed out by the Clinton admin that Saddam supported international terror and supported Syria..... look up Harp project also.
No it didn't change. The world did not change at 9/11. Fifth amendment and also the Geneve convention. Again, why compare with Saddam, if you are benchmarking torture after dictators you're a fucking moron. Well.. You can't count all terrorists in the same category. I thought you were going after Al-Quaida, not anyone killing people.. and Saddam and Usama hate each other. Saddam was trying to drive him away from Iraq.
Visfen, your very slow.... but thats okay your learn. The US Constitution does not protect terrorists unless they are US citizens. Your the moron because you can't read..... so pay attention here.... as I said you call it torture I call it humiliation a big difference. If you want to complain about torture where were you when Saddam was in power.... you could have saved thousands. AGAIN SADDAM SUPPORTED INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM..... GET IT?
Many people think that the constitution say that even people without citizenship deserves a trial. It is torture, make no mistake, people in captivity getting hurt, that is the very definition in the geneve convention. Who gives a shit what Saddam did, to keep comparing to him is so retarded. Not really, he supported an insurgency in the same way the US did in Afghanistan, that they have started in Iraq now and have done in countless countries. Bottom line is that Osama and Saddam were enemies.
And the reason you went in to Iraq was to get rid of the WMDs that posed a "direct threat" to the US, not because of the people he killed in the 80s, when you didn't give a shit. And whatever threat he posed for the support he gave to those terrorist that aided his cause is nothing against the breeding-ground Iraq now has become. The Iraq war is the largest tactical failure in modern history.
Visfen, what would you know about US policy? The Kurds are very happy to have been liberated by us. WMD.... only leader to use them since WW2.... where were you when he was gasing Kurds? He certainly had the capability to manufacture WMD. Tactical failure? Your opinion.... but have you been there? Of course not.... but why believe me ask the Kurds and other Iraqis that are interested in freedom and the chance to live a prosperous life.
Apparently more than you. Yeah, they are happy to be liberated, but the hate your guts still for first putting Saddam in power and then now refusing to leave. That's just not right, A lot of leaders have used WMDs, and apart from the VX gas that obviously would be found there was really nothing. But he did not had the capability to produce nuclear weapon, which was the main reason for invasion. All that is left is the possibility that he moved them to Syria.
The war has cost more than 500 billion dollars and the US have managed to increase the danger to the US. That's the worst money ever spent. Does it matter if I have been there? It's totally irrelevant. But if you insist with this stupidity I can tell you I even have friend serving in the Insurgency.
Visfen, I would suggest you go there and find the real truth..... instead of making blanket statements from lies you have read on the web. Eduicate yourself and speak to me.
Prosperous life? The situation for civilians in Iraq is worse now than under the regime of a brutal dictator. The democracy is failing, completely. Just a few days ago six ministers resign, and earlier this year another five resign because the US forces refuses to leave their soil. I think they enjoyed that you killed Saddam, but it's time to get the F out of there. They are asking you to leave, what would you say if a uninvited guest overstayed their visit for four years?
Visfen, I would suggest you go there and find the real truth..... instead of making blanket statements from lies you have read on the web. Eduicate yourself and speak to me.
Blanket statements = statistics and stories from first hand experiences? You are definetly proof that arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand. You clearly know nothing of the situation there and have no interest in learning of how incredibly harmful this operation have been to the US. I leave you in your ignorance with these words, people like you are the reason why the US is falling apart. Have fun spending 20% of your taxes on a pointless war.
Visfen, pay attention you stupid dork.... your attitude is the same reason you couldn't fight your way out of a wet paperbag during WW2. So you want us to take advise from a fagot from Sweden..... get a fucking life and pay attention to your own issues... the US is doing just fine.
The Swedes were neutral cuz they weren't stupid enough to kill off their whole population in the war. They however, did give refuge to Jews and rescued them from Nazi death camps in a time when the whole world was fucking racist. Much more civilized than putting thousands of innocent Iraqis at constant risk to look for non existant weapons of mass destruction.
Ecthelon, your another dipshit that doesn't have any clue. Instead of talking shit why don't you go to Iraq and find the truth instead of getting your liberal senseless point of veiw off the web. The realality regardless of all the bad news stories in the media is that the majortiy of Iraqis want us there and are doing very well as a result. Neutral = COWARD!!!
The majority of Iraqis want you out of their. The Iraqi government has asked you to leave on many occasions but you refuse to give a plan for withdrawal. And you keep saying "go to Iraq and find out the truth", have you been there? The truth is that the only Iraqis that want you there are a minority of the people living in Baghdad (only part of the country you have secured). And the population is poorer and more exposed than before you entered the military conflict (not war).
Visfen, listen to yourself..... what a pity. I'm sure if I got all my information off the internet about Sweden and told you I was an expert... it would be laughable to you... right? Well, I'm laughing at you now.... genus.
Not if it was correct. Which my facts are. But you don't seem to care about facts so why even bother trying to have a discussion with you. Let's just all live in this imaginary world where you can say that the military conflict was a success without backing it up with any evidence or ever defining the meaning of "success".
Visfen, you are right about that.... it is difficult to debate someone smarter then you. Again I never said the word "sucess"... it was necessary. As far as the Iraqi people are concerned the majority do want us there and they see the light at the end of the tunnel. So are you still ignorant to believe the media? Of course you are. Ever take journalism? You should to find out the truth about the lies that they report.
No they don't. Where do you get that lie from? I'm sorry that you don't like the way media portray the Iraq military conflict based on facts, statistics and first hand experiences, but the truth sometimes doesn't fit your agenda. I live in a country with 200 000 Muslims from that area of the world, I rather believe their stories than your fucking bullshit.
The funny thing is that you have nothing to back up your claims with but still you insists that you are right.. and I am stupid enough to actually try to debate with you. No I don't take journalism, which is relevant why? I take science and economy. Science, which is far superior to journalism when it comes to objectivity. Something you clearly are not aware of.
Visfen, my point being that you would learn how they have twisted your mind by understand journalism. It's amazing how stupid you are.... yes it's a waste of time to debate an idiot that has never been to Iraq. You should grow up.... and keep an open mind.
Please, evidence. In contrary to journalism I actually need proof to buy into an ideology. To say that I don't understand the media because I haven't taken journalism is retarded, it's not a difficult subject, science however, is far more complex. Anyone can be a journalist. Not everyone could be a doctor or a scientists...
Visfen, "To say that I don't understand the media because I haven't taken journalism is retarded"..... but you are retarded. Again, learn a little about the reporting and how it's reported.... and you may.... understand a little bit more on how inaccurate the media reports the situation in Iraq.... and elsewhere.
That insult doesn't even make sense. I am retarded because your statement is retarded? What.. I know plenty of how reporting works, you don't have to take journalism to learn how the news works, and I know plenty more about the facts and statistics of the situation there, something you have yet to present that supports your position in this debate. All you come to the table with is arrogance, I have yet to see any facts.
What does that sentence even mean? When you try to insult me, which is all you do, cause you fail so utterly at all levels when I try to debate you, at least make some kind of argument to why I am those things, and please make the sentence coherent.. this is just sad.
We didn't fight in WWII. That attitude made us the wealthiest nation in the world (GNP) for 20 years after the war ended. You don't have to take my advice, you can read the CIA's, listen to the representatives for one of the many Intelligence Agencies, listen to the Generals in charge, listen to the people of the US or just simply read and think. Anyone who think this "war" (which it is not, only congress can declare war) is a success is either misinformed or an idiot.
American politics affect the whole world. My involvement, and cunning, in issues that affect me but certainly you more is in a way embarrassing considering that I know more of geo-politics and the Iraq war than you do.
and btw, I rather be a living coward than a dead idiot.
Visfen, war is never a success.... but it is often necessary..... did I say that? The problem with you is that you read to much into it. Ask a Kurd the truth.
I don't think you know where the majority of immigrants in Sweden come from. It's from Iran, Iraq and "Kurdistan". I have tons of friends that come from that part of the world, and believe me, they love what you did with Saddam, but they still hate your guts. And so does all the polls say.
Visfen, polls are extremely misleading.... you make a lot of blanket statements and have no idea what you are talking about. He are very typical of most know-it-alls on YouTube.
Eh.. I base my opinions on facts and stories from people who have been there. You haven't even told me what your foundation for your opinion is, to me it looks like it is just a blatant hatred towards all media, and a conspiracy theorists idea that all news are lies. Please give me some solid evidence. Or is that something you don't believe in either?
Visfen, facts? off the internet? I advise you to verify your sources before you believe them. I have no need to prove anything to you.... I do not have any reason to lie or misinform you or anyone just tell it as I see it. Your biggest problem is you believe what you want to believe.... my message to you is keep an open mind and.... verify your information before you make an ass out of yourself.
Actually you do. That is what debate is about. And not everything you read on the internet are lies. My information comes from serious news papers (such as The Times, Washington post, herald + some Swedish newspapers), the CIA, Nationmaster, friends from Iraq and the UN. Your information comes from.. what? your little trip to Iraq and what little you saw, that's as subjective as it gets. I have no agenda here, you however do have one, just look at your own profile...
Visfen, much of what is on the internat and rported by the media is a liberal slanted version... with a few halve truths thrown in. You read a lot of liberal shiy buddy..... LOL.... no wonder your information is so far off in LEFT field. What's the matter won't your Mommy let you go to Iraq to see it for yourself? Does she think you are a coward too?
It's so typical for conservatives to resort to partisan and hackery. Making a statement that the media is liberal to be able to disregard ALL the facts presented. The war issue is not a left or right issue, it has nothing to do with that. And if anything the Right Wing issue has always been isolationism. And I've heard you conservatives use the word "liberal" like a curse word a couple of times. It's so fucking retarded. BOTH PARTIES ARE LIBERAL.
Visfen, I have always been ahainst the war..... hear me always..... but the liberals are the ones that point out any faults. Basicly, the liberals are adding the terrorists.... that's retarded.
What? How is that "adding" to terrorism? (it's "aiding" btw, Is American English really your first language?) Actually those who are aiding the terrorists are those officials who continue to push policies that insight hatred for the US around the world.
Visfen, again you are wrong..... those that hate the Americans have always hated them.... US policy doesn't create hatred..... again your opinion is in left field.
No they have not. And yes it does, it's called backlash, a common word used in geo-politics. Just read the CIA's report on 911. I can give you some examples just from the top of my head; Saddam, Iran and Usama. Saddam wouldn't have gotten into power if not for CIA support, Iran actually was becoming a democracy when you went over there and put the extremists in charge and everyone knows the CIA gave Usama money to fight the communists.
Who says you have to chose sides at all? The Swedish government have been praised by Usama because we don't intervene with other countries. It proves that if you don't get involved with other countries they will leave you alone. I mean.. the USA is 96th of 121 countries on the global peace index. And you have been attacked by another nation one time in the past 300 years. That's why people hate the US government, because you bomb the shit out of other nations, without any legimite reason
And to be clear on something, not many people hate "Americans". Actually Americans are very like able trough out the whole world, it's the American government people hate. And it's not even an opinion, it's a simple fact that backlash is something that comes from non isolationism policy. You clearly don't know very much about international politics.
Visfen, well, I guess your the expert on international politics too. Interesting opinion but.... human behavior usually works the opposite hatred towards the person because of where they come from first.... then once they get to know the person they change... that's a little different, but regardless.... hatred toward the coutry subsides. Maybe the Swedes are concerned who likes them.... most other peoples could really careless. BTW, do you speak another tongue?
Everyone should care how their people is being represented. I know many Americans do. I know some Japanese, German and French, but it's really only English except for Scandinavian languages that I speak well. Relevance ? :P Anyway, let's just think about it. What would you think of China if they had been bombing you for 15 years? Killing your family and friends, taking everything from you. That's where terrorism is born. They don't hate you without any reason.
Visfen, lets face it you side with the terrorists.... that's rather foolish when they would just as soon cut your throat. What would anyone expect from a dumb kid in a liberal country like Sweden. You suck..... go hug a tree.
Side? No! I understand them, big difference.. that's also the first rule of war. You don't know why they do the things they do and that's why you, and the people who are aligned with your opinion, could never stop terrorism. And please stop acting like a 12 year old. And liberal is something good, I hope you know that even if you're an imperialist.
Visfen, looks like your liberals can't make up their minds.... they're flip flopping on the war again.... when are you going too? It's not to late..... or can't you swallow your pride?
You're just such a hack, I don't wanna talk to you anymore. You contribute with nothing to this discussion except "you suck, liberals are bad, I'm right because I say I am".
I generally like Americans, but do not love the segment of the U.S. pop. that pretends that the bit, "they just hate us for our freedoms" is still true. Or, that people are born hating America. This unwillingness to face truth has been catastrophic for the world. The bush admin. is out of control after getting a pass from people who would rather be victims and live in lies, rather than be mature adults who face truth to help themselves.
The UN was looking into Bush admin.'s(false) claims about WMDs. It was reporting back what later turned out to be the truth. If the US had observed International Law, it wouldn't be in such a mess.
Your facts are rather fucked-up. The UN didn't both to look very hard.... since the Gulf War the UN failed hands down. Saddam was the one that violated international law.... we had a just cause to invade.... mess? What do you define as a mess? the Iraqi people are much better off then under Saddam.
The UN had more accurate info. about Iraq than so-called CIA. Here's an example of how twisted your thinking is: America must go an enforce international law that Iraq violated by violating international law. Mess: hundreds of thousands of people maimed or dead for U.S. to take over Iraq's oil supplies.
Please show me proof that the US was benifited from Iraqi oil.... you are again mis-lead by the liberal press. The northern oil fields have been in contract with Turkish companies for some time now. The UN fabricated information to mis-lead the international community,,,, again your information is incorrect. Saddam violated international law for over 12 years since after the Gulf War and before that... need I tell you?
thain456, may i remind you that Liberals point out that the bush administration lied to the american people, used the 9/11 attacks a reason to get the american people behind a lie. Bush, Rumsfield and Cheney lied to the very people they were supposed to protect. They took advantage of the american people after 9/11 they made up lies to congress and the UN. 9/11 gave them their chance to invade. Fact check thain456, saddam had no ties to al-quaida and had nothing to do with 9/11. Im a Liberal.
The U.N. looked into U.S. false claims and presented info. that has not been refuted since. Can U.S. and the bullied CIA say the same? So according to you, U.S. had to enforce international law by breaking international law? "Mess": 100 000's maimed and dead so that U.S. co.'s can take over Iraq's natural resources and YOUR govn't's treasury.
The UN had good reason to delay the war in Iraq.... they were living on the high-hog there and profiteering since 1991 with nothing to show for it. Most of the Iraqi caualities have been a result of terrorists..... you can't blaim the US for that.... unless you are on the side of terroism.
actually, you can blame our country for alot of the terrorism going on there now. al qaeda would have never been there if it wasnt for us. But you no, its not ok for a liberal to say that war is wrong, we are un patriotic because we want out, we are on the side of terrorist. But yet a conservative like Bush, Rumsfeild and Cheney can lie and use a terrorist attack as a way to deceive the public into backing a war on a country that had nothing to do with it.
Visfen, you can't have an intelligent opinion about the situation in Iraq unless you are there, have been there, or are getting *ACCURATE* information. The problem is that you easter bunny have neither. To base your knowledge on the information that is reported is foolish. YOU ARE A FOOL.
Debate is about presenting facts and philosophies, something you clearly have no interest in doing. My analysis of the situation in Iraq is the same as the experts. It is supported by facts, statistics and experiences from people who have been there. That's the very definition of accurate. You insist that the statistics and facts, experts and the media presents are wrong, with no evidence to support the claim. Foolish is to base your opinion on nothing but arrogance
Visfen, unlike you I base my information on personal experience. What I have witnessed myself and information which is often not public knowledge. Your information is based on what you have read off the internet.... you need help.
Let's be clear, you were probably in Baghdad, pretty much the only place that is secured in Iraq, and you base your opinion on your little narrow view of what you saw there. Then I come along and I base my information on several sources, many of them being highly decorated military generals that have been in the area of Iraq for 16 years now. And you have the arrogance to say you know better than me, statistics and all the experts? Please, get a fucking clue.
Visfen, again you are wrong.... fishing? I guess you might be good at that? I know some of those top generals and have been in briefings with them. History will prove I'm right and your wrong.... go back to fishing you might be better at that.
No you have not been... You are lying trough your teeth. If you had been "all over" and in meetings with generals your stance on the war should be a little bit more enlighten and a little bit less arrogant. Fishing? Relevance? you're definetly one weird little boy (I'm becoming more and more convinced you're at most 18 years old, and all your stories are lies) Please say something enlightened, something intelligent, something you can prove and fact check and isn't just a spin to fit your agenda.
Visfen, so you can just try to disprove me..... so that it fits into your silly twisted liberal mind? LOL... this little 18 year old boy was a guest at Barzani's house and treated like a prince for one weekend. You have know idea what you are talking about and who you are talking too!
Actually by reading what and how you write I can make a prediction of how old you are. You act as though you're maybe at tops 18. Why would I believe you, you have no proof and everything points to it being a complete fabrication.
No, ask Europeans or anyone from the middle east, they will tell you they have nothing against the people but everything against the government. The people of the USA have done nothing to anyone, it's the government policies that enforce a imperialistic agenda over the world, and it's that agenda that have insighted the hatred in so many Muslims. And that's exactly what the 911 commission or CIA will tell you, two extremely conservative groups.
Visfen, and by the way I've been all over Iraq and the middle east.... I've been travling my entire life. You should do the same.... it might clear some cobwebs out of your cranial cavity.
This is not 4 years ago where you could say "well we took down Saddam so the Kurds love us", now they want you to leave, even the Kurds. If you don't know this then please ignore to responds and just be ignorant in silence. I'd prefer it that way. And you have said the war was necessary. Was it? No, there was no imminent threat. And now there is MORE terrorism now than under Saddam's regime. You have spent 500 billion dollars on something that has made you less safe.
And btw, have you been there? And to follow your own logic; Have you been everywhere in Iraq? Have you talked to everyone? Have you lived there all your life?.. one could go on and on with your idiotcracy that the only thing that could ever be true to the facts is first hand experiences. Instead of expanding the debate with your arguments you are shrinking it and making it personal, not subject-related. It's a method often used by people who don't have any facts to back up their opinions.
Well you are right in that in order to call the war a disaster we have to define failure and success. Let's say we measure success only by the capture of Saddam, then it would be a success. If we however measure success after, Iraq security, Iraq wealth, Iraqi peoples wellbeing, US economy or US security this war comes out as a terrible failure, cause all of those have gone awfully bad. Especially the US economy (deficit of 10 trillion dollars).
Another dumbass question, but at least it brings attention to the lack of attention Gravel is getting. We are supposed to push for candidates putting forth good policy, not who we think will win.
Top Employers of Contributors to Obama's campaign: Lehman Brothers, investment banker Citadel Investment Group, hedge fund investments Goldman Sachs, investment banker J.P. Morgan Chase, investment banker Citigroup, financial services Morgan Stanley, investment banker Proskauer Rose, law firm Jones Day, law firm University of Chicago University of California Google, internet services SONY Pictures 20th Century Fox, media and entertainment
Obama is full of shit. As a TCK, you could care less about the "teachers". You just want to understand what the fuck it means to be entitled, like Americans feel.
englanddg 2 years ago
@englanddg PAAAAHH hahaha. fail...
MinGophers 1 year ago
@MinGophers - Are you a Third Culture Kid (TCK)? Is the job of every teacher to make children feel "special"? I was under the impression it was their job to effectively communicate skills. With regards to self-esteem and other froo froo bullshit, I thought that's what parents were for.
englanddg 1 year ago
@englanddg When was that EVER discussed in our only 2 messages prior to that?
I agree wholeheartedly with that. But your first message? Fail... And in a sense...so is your second message since you begin to make odd accusations based on misreading only two 2 messages.
MinGophers 1 year ago
I mentioned TCK, I also mentioned the role of teaching people to feel entitled or otherwise "special". My comments haven't changed...perhaps I communicated them poorly.
englanddg 1 year ago
@englanddg Oh. Sorry. I understand now.
MinGophers 1 year ago
@MinGophers All good. No worries.
englanddg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hillary Clinton is the eldest of three and has two YOUNGER brothers. I think this is the reason why she is so powerful. We need more Hillarys and (Meryls, who is of the same birth order) don't you think? So if your first child happens to be a girl, and your second child a boy, then have a third child. Hopefully he is a boy.
DoWhaJo 2 years ago
il start my own debate!! which is better;halo 3 or gears of war 2? you decide ... dun dun dun...de dun
kingkerwick 2 years ago
gravel is great! haha
laxnumbuh11 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012 REVOLUTION
legacy6684 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
posted news worldnetdaily - March 30, 2009 -
Obama Lies-Senate Uses Sneak Attack On Guns
Barack Obama deliberately and repeatedly lied to America's 90 million gun owners when he insisted that he would not try to take away anyone's firearms.
Call Senators and Congressmen today,1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOU'RE OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to take guns away!
CALL PRESIDENT OBAMA, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414
DONEwCA 2 years ago
Gravel is a funny, grumpy old man. Reminds me of my granddad, may he r.i.p.
deoxyribonuclease 3 years ago
why would u ask such an irrelevant question, why the hell does it mater who their favorite teacher was.
tsingh4 3 years ago
It has been stated and proven that there are a LOT of U.S. investments in this. It all adds up and there is too much evidence for it to be mere coincidence.
Fortifius 4 years ago
You guys invaded a country on a LIE!! But the good thing is that this country was run by a despot wich wasn't very popular in the U.S.A. . Iran on the other hand should have been the target. We know they are building WMDs, we know they are dangerous. North Korea's the same. It has been known that Kim Jong Il had WMDs even before the Iraq invasion. But unfortunatly, North Korea doesn't have any oil. By the way, a pipeline is being built between Turkey and Koweit .
Fortifius 4 years ago
Thain, do you realise that you are pro-war? Your country was attacked in 9/11. Bin Laden and the talibans were the target. They are funding terrorist groups from all around the world. But what boggles me is why in the hell did the Pentagon deemed Osama as an obsolete target and decided to go after Iraq instead. If Iraqis wanted a different form of goverment they would have overthrown Saddam anyway (and were in the process of doing so).Otherwise a country minds its own buisness.
Fortifius 4 years ago
obama makes every non political question political... which i like though. obama 4 president!
JossyHadash 4 years ago
Go Obama
ckaprince 4 years ago
Mike Gravel's response was perfect!
sseasons 4 years ago
Gravel got the biggest applause!
JakePelka 4 years ago
worst question of the debate. totally irrelevant. wish we would have heard the censored question about impeachment instead of this horrible question.
hartelc 4 years ago
thain456: Man, a lot of hostility coming from you. If you met me in person you would quickly realize that I am no tree hugger. Go play on the highway and allow adults to continue a rational discourse. Better yet, ask your mom to you to the ice cream truck. They have your favorite flavor. "Tutti Fruiti".
gjohnson87109 4 years ago
This question helped us to see the canidate's characters. By seeing what educational experiences are important to each canidate, we can see how they will be swayed on future decisions. Each canidate can make up anything you want to hear about the "big" issues, but we can really see the canidate's true colors by personal questions like this.
wildflower12 4 years ago
How is this question relevant to the major global problems we have today. I mean it's great to learn about the candidates past but we have a crisis in our hands that we need to solve.
filliwian 4 years ago
thain456: Dude, at least be a part of the discussion. Cursing and being irreverant is a sign of lack of intelligence (at the very least) or, a cry for attention. Which is it? IMPEACHMENT NOW!
gjohnson87109 4 years ago
gjohnson87109, sounds like you need the attention dickhead.... get off the impeachment thought..... it isn't happening.... so go hug a fucking tree asshole.
thain456 4 years ago
WHat happened to the "Impeachment Questions"? I could care less about the candidates favorite teacher. What a lame and useless question by itself. Couple this question with education reform and this would have been an appropriate question. CNN you get a big fat "F""!
gjohnson87109 4 years ago
Shut-up you fucking liberal.... impeach the blow job!
thain456 4 years ago
I'm not a liberal and I agree w/ impeaching Bush and Cheney.
*illegal wiretapping
*fraudulant war
*torture
puppydogbreath 4 years ago
puppydogbreath, wow.... that's laughable.... brush your teeth and then educate yourself.
thain456 4 years ago
Are you going to deny that the illegal wiretapping, torture never happened?
and
Where are the WMDs? Al-Qaida had no relations w/ Hussein?
puppydogbreath 4 years ago
dogbreath, read the regulations on wiretapping you'll be glad they did..... for your protection. Torture.... you call that torture? Okay, I don't agree with the way that was handled but is it an impeachable.... not. Torture has been going on before Bush. WMD.... with out question he had the means to produce them and had used them in the past.... think about the threat with the Harp project. Ties to international terrorism..... yes Saddam did.
thain456 4 years ago
No, no, no.. please educate your self. Wiretapping is supposed to be handled by court order, not by what the police "feel" is right - think about the personal agenda problem. Torture is against the constitution, totally impeachable. And he did NOT have WMD's and he actually faught Osama! They hated each other.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, court ordered for international calls.... yeah thats a good waste of tax dollars for you. Police... don't you mean the computers at NSA? If you call that torture you should have seen what Saddam did.... but go ahead quote the constitution for me. He did not fight Osama.... dork and he did not fight against Ansar al-Islam because they were killing Kurds. Any other questions school boy?
thain456 4 years ago
So you don't think we have a right to privacy? And wiretapping and Echelon is different... So what, if I shoot you in the head, and I am one of thousands of your enemies then you can shoot everybody in the leg? Who gives a shit what Saddam did, like the US should ever take after that faggot. Get real, Osama hated Saddam and Saddam hated him, even the 911 report states so.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, yes.... of course..... the problem is that the world has changed my friend... thank an Arab for that. Quote the constitution on torture you brought it up..... but if you call that torture you don't know what is.... if you compare it to Saddam I would call it just humiliation. Also, it is a known fact even pointed out by the Clinton admin that Saddam supported international terror and supported Syria..... look up Harp project also.
thain456 4 years ago
No it didn't change. The world did not change at 9/11. Fifth amendment and also the Geneve convention. Again, why compare with Saddam, if you are benchmarking torture after dictators you're a fucking moron. Well.. You can't count all terrorists in the same category. I thought you were going after Al-Quaida, not anyone killing people.. and Saddam and Usama hate each other. Saddam was trying to drive him away from Iraq.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, your very slow.... but thats okay your learn. The US Constitution does not protect terrorists unless they are US citizens. Your the moron because you can't read..... so pay attention here.... as I said you call it torture I call it humiliation a big difference. If you want to complain about torture where were you when Saddam was in power.... you could have saved thousands. AGAIN SADDAM SUPPORTED INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM..... GET IT?
thain456 4 years ago
Many people think that the constitution say that even people without citizenship deserves a trial. It is torture, make no mistake, people in captivity getting hurt, that is the very definition in the geneve convention. Who gives a shit what Saddam did, to keep comparing to him is so retarded. Not really, he supported an insurgency in the same way the US did in Afghanistan, that they have started in Iraq now and have done in countless countries. Bottom line is that Osama and Saddam were enemies.
Visfen 4 years ago
And the reason you went in to Iraq was to get rid of the WMDs that posed a "direct threat" to the US, not because of the people he killed in the 80s, when you didn't give a shit. And whatever threat he posed for the support he gave to those terrorist that aided his cause is nothing against the breeding-ground Iraq now has become. The Iraq war is the largest tactical failure in modern history.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, what would you know about US policy? The Kurds are very happy to have been liberated by us. WMD.... only leader to use them since WW2.... where were you when he was gasing Kurds? He certainly had the capability to manufacture WMD. Tactical failure? Your opinion.... but have you been there? Of course not.... but why believe me ask the Kurds and other Iraqis that are interested in freedom and the chance to live a prosperous life.
thain456 4 years ago
Apparently more than you. Yeah, they are happy to be liberated, but the hate your guts still for first putting Saddam in power and then now refusing to leave. That's just not right, A lot of leaders have used WMDs, and apart from the VX gas that obviously would be found there was really nothing. But he did not had the capability to produce nuclear weapon, which was the main reason for invasion. All that is left is the possibility that he moved them to Syria.
Visfen 4 years ago
The war has cost more than 500 billion dollars and the US have managed to increase the danger to the US. That's the worst money ever spent. Does it matter if I have been there? It's totally irrelevant. But if you insist with this stupidity I can tell you I even have friend serving in the Insurgency.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, I would suggest you go there and find the real truth..... instead of making blanket statements from lies you have read on the web. Eduicate yourself and speak to me.
thain456 4 years ago
Prosperous life? The situation for civilians in Iraq is worse now than under the regime of a brutal dictator. The democracy is failing, completely. Just a few days ago six ministers resign, and earlier this year another five resign because the US forces refuses to leave their soil. I think they enjoyed that you killed Saddam, but it's time to get the F out of there. They are asking you to leave, what would you say if a uninvited guest overstayed their visit for four years?
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, I would suggest you go there and find the real truth..... instead of making blanket statements from lies you have read on the web. Eduicate yourself and speak to me.
thain456 4 years ago
Maybe.... just maybe you can understand it if you read it twice.
thain456 4 years ago
Blanket statements = statistics and stories from first hand experiences? You are definetly proof that arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand. You clearly know nothing of the situation there and have no interest in learning of how incredibly harmful this operation have been to the US. I leave you in your ignorance with these words, people like you are the reason why the US is falling apart. Have fun spending 20% of your taxes on a pointless war.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, pay attention you stupid dork.... your attitude is the same reason you couldn't fight your way out of a wet paperbag during WW2. So you want us to take advise from a fagot from Sweden..... get a fucking life and pay attention to your own issues... the US is doing just fine.
thain456 4 years ago
The Swedes were neutral cuz they weren't stupid enough to kill off their whole population in the war. They however, did give refuge to Jews and rescued them from Nazi death camps in a time when the whole world was fucking racist. Much more civilized than putting thousands of innocent Iraqis at constant risk to look for non existant weapons of mass destruction.
Ecthelon 4 years ago
Ecthelon, your another dipshit that doesn't have any clue. Instead of talking shit why don't you go to Iraq and find the truth instead of getting your liberal senseless point of veiw off the web. The realality regardless of all the bad news stories in the media is that the majortiy of Iraqis want us there and are doing very well as a result. Neutral = COWARD!!!
thain456 4 years ago
are you in Iraq right now? how would you know?
Ecthelon 4 years ago
Do you have a need to know? Follow my suggestion and educate yourself.... otherwise you look real dumb fella.
thain456 4 years ago
The majority of Iraqis want you out of their. The Iraqi government has asked you to leave on many occasions but you refuse to give a plan for withdrawal. And you keep saying "go to Iraq and find out the truth", have you been there? The truth is that the only Iraqis that want you there are a minority of the people living in Baghdad (only part of the country you have secured). And the population is poorer and more exposed than before you entered the military conflict (not war).
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, listen to yourself..... what a pity. I'm sure if I got all my information off the internet about Sweden and told you I was an expert... it would be laughable to you... right? Well, I'm laughing at you now.... genus.
thain456 4 years ago
Not if it was correct. Which my facts are. But you don't seem to care about facts so why even bother trying to have a discussion with you. Let's just all live in this imaginary world where you can say that the military conflict was a success without backing it up with any evidence or ever defining the meaning of "success".
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you are right about that.... it is difficult to debate someone smarter then you. Again I never said the word "sucess"... it was necessary. As far as the Iraqi people are concerned the majority do want us there and they see the light at the end of the tunnel. So are you still ignorant to believe the media? Of course you are. Ever take journalism? You should to find out the truth about the lies that they report.
thain456 4 years ago
No they don't. Where do you get that lie from? I'm sorry that you don't like the way media portray the Iraq military conflict based on facts, statistics and first hand experiences, but the truth sometimes doesn't fit your agenda. I live in a country with 200 000 Muslims from that area of the world, I rather believe their stories than your fucking bullshit.
Visfen 4 years ago
The funny thing is that you have nothing to back up your claims with but still you insists that you are right.. and I am stupid enough to actually try to debate with you. No I don't take journalism, which is relevant why? I take science and economy. Science, which is far superior to journalism when it comes to objectivity. Something you clearly are not aware of.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, my point being that you would learn how they have twisted your mind by understand journalism. It's amazing how stupid you are.... yes it's a waste of time to debate an idiot that has never been to Iraq. You should grow up.... and keep an open mind.
thain456 4 years ago
Please, evidence. In contrary to journalism I actually need proof to buy into an ideology. To say that I don't understand the media because I haven't taken journalism is retarded, it's not a difficult subject, science however, is far more complex. Anyone can be a journalist. Not everyone could be a doctor or a scientists...
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, "To say that I don't understand the media because I haven't taken journalism is retarded"..... but you are retarded. Again, learn a little about the reporting and how it's reported.... and you may.... understand a little bit more on how inaccurate the media reports the situation in Iraq.... and elsewhere.
thain456 4 years ago
That insult doesn't even make sense. I am retarded because your statement is retarded? What.. I know plenty of how reporting works, you don't have to take journalism to learn how the news works, and I know plenty more about the facts and statistics of the situation there, something you have yet to present that supports your position in this debate. All you come to the table with is arrogance, I have yet to see any facts.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, the facts are before you and I told you how to obtain you.... I label you as a coward and a retard.
thain456 4 years ago
What does that sentence even mean? When you try to insult me, which is all you do, cause you fail so utterly at all levels when I try to debate you, at least make some kind of argument to why I am those things, and please make the sentence coherent.. this is just sad.
Visfen 4 years ago
We didn't fight in WWII. That attitude made us the wealthiest nation in the world (GNP) for 20 years after the war ended. You don't have to take my advice, you can read the CIA's, listen to the representatives for one of the many Intelligence Agencies, listen to the Generals in charge, listen to the people of the US or just simply read and think. Anyone who think this "war" (which it is not, only congress can declare war) is a success is either misinformed or an idiot.
Visfen 4 years ago
CIA's report on the situation in Iraq.
American politics affect the whole world. My involvement, and cunning, in issues that affect me but certainly you more is in a way embarrassing considering that I know more of geo-politics and the Iraq war than you do.
and btw, I rather be a living coward than a dead idiot.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you are a living coward.
thain456 4 years ago
Visfen, war is never a success.... but it is often necessary..... did I say that? The problem with you is that you read to much into it. Ask a Kurd the truth.
thain456 4 years ago
I don't think you know where the majority of immigrants in Sweden come from. It's from Iran, Iraq and "Kurdistan". I have tons of friends that come from that part of the world, and believe me, they love what you did with Saddam, but they still hate your guts. And so does all the polls say.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you don't even understand the mechanics of how mis-leading the polls can be.
thain456 4 years ago
Polls are not misleading, they are a representation of the peoples will.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, polls are extremely misleading.... you make a lot of blanket statements and have no idea what you are talking about. He are very typical of most know-it-alls on YouTube.
thain456 4 years ago
Eh.. I base my opinions on facts and stories from people who have been there. You haven't even told me what your foundation for your opinion is, to me it looks like it is just a blatant hatred towards all media, and a conspiracy theorists idea that all news are lies. Please give me some solid evidence. Or is that something you don't believe in either?
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, facts? off the internet? I advise you to verify your sources before you believe them. I have no need to prove anything to you.... I do not have any reason to lie or misinform you or anyone just tell it as I see it. Your biggest problem is you believe what you want to believe.... my message to you is keep an open mind and.... verify your information before you make an ass out of yourself.
thain456 4 years ago
Actually you do. That is what debate is about. And not everything you read on the internet are lies. My information comes from serious news papers (such as The Times, Washington post, herald + some Swedish newspapers), the CIA, Nationmaster, friends from Iraq and the UN. Your information comes from.. what? your little trip to Iraq and what little you saw, that's as subjective as it gets. I have no agenda here, you however do have one, just look at your own profile...
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, much of what is on the internat and rported by the media is a liberal slanted version... with a few halve truths thrown in. You read a lot of liberal shiy buddy..... LOL.... no wonder your information is so far off in LEFT field. What's the matter won't your Mommy let you go to Iraq to see it for yourself? Does she think you are a coward too?
thain456 4 years ago
It's so typical for conservatives to resort to partisan and hackery. Making a statement that the media is liberal to be able to disregard ALL the facts presented. The war issue is not a left or right issue, it has nothing to do with that. And if anything the Right Wing issue has always been isolationism. And I've heard you conservatives use the word "liberal" like a curse word a couple of times. It's so fucking retarded. BOTH PARTIES ARE LIBERAL.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, I have always been ahainst the war..... hear me always..... but the liberals are the ones that point out any faults. Basicly, the liberals are adding the terrorists.... that's retarded.
thain456 4 years ago
What? How is that "adding" to terrorism? (it's "aiding" btw, Is American English really your first language?) Actually those who are aiding the terrorists are those officials who continue to push policies that insight hatred for the US around the world.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, again you are wrong..... those that hate the Americans have always hated them.... US policy doesn't create hatred..... again your opinion is in left field.
thain456 4 years ago
No they have not. And yes it does, it's called backlash, a common word used in geo-politics. Just read the CIA's report on 911. I can give you some examples just from the top of my head; Saddam, Iran and Usama. Saddam wouldn't have gotten into power if not for CIA support, Iran actually was becoming a democracy when you went over there and put the extremists in charge and everyone knows the CIA gave Usama money to fight the communists.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, that's is revisionist history... but if.... just if the CIA did help Saddam. You could agrue it was the lesser of two evils.
thain456 4 years ago
Who says you have to chose sides at all? The Swedish government have been praised by Usama because we don't intervene with other countries. It proves that if you don't get involved with other countries they will leave you alone. I mean.. the USA is 96th of 121 countries on the global peace index. And you have been attacked by another nation one time in the past 300 years. That's why people hate the US government, because you bomb the shit out of other nations, without any legimite reason
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you should read some history books.
thain456 4 years ago
I study history and economic history. The only military attack I'm refuring to is Pearl Harbor.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, then you should be smart enough to figure out there was a few more..... perhaps?
thain456 4 years ago
And to be clear on something, not many people hate "Americans". Actually Americans are very like able trough out the whole world, it's the American government people hate. And it's not even an opinion, it's a simple fact that backlash is something that comes from non isolationism policy. You clearly don't know very much about international politics.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, well, I guess your the expert on international politics too. Interesting opinion but.... human behavior usually works the opposite hatred towards the person because of where they come from first.... then once they get to know the person they change... that's a little different, but regardless.... hatred toward the coutry subsides. Maybe the Swedes are concerned who likes them.... most other peoples could really careless. BTW, do you speak another tongue?
thain456 4 years ago
Everyone should care how their people is being represented. I know many Americans do. I know some Japanese, German and French, but it's really only English except for Scandinavian languages that I speak well. Relevance ? :P Anyway, let's just think about it. What would you think of China if they had been bombing you for 15 years? Killing your family and friends, taking everything from you. That's where terrorism is born. They don't hate you without any reason.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, lets face it you side with the terrorists.... that's rather foolish when they would just as soon cut your throat. What would anyone expect from a dumb kid in a liberal country like Sweden. You suck..... go hug a tree.
thain456 4 years ago
Side? No! I understand them, big difference.. that's also the first rule of war. You don't know why they do the things they do and that's why you, and the people who are aligned with your opinion, could never stop terrorism. And please stop acting like a 12 year old. And liberal is something good, I hope you know that even if you're an imperialist.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you suck Jihdist dick.
thain456 4 years ago
Visfen, looks like your liberals can't make up their minds.... they're flip flopping on the war again.... when are you going too? It's not to late..... or can't you swallow your pride?
thain456 4 years ago
You're just such a hack, I don't wanna talk to you anymore. You contribute with nothing to this discussion except "you suck, liberals are bad, I'm right because I say I am".
Visfen 4 years ago
PRESTO
thain456 4 years ago
I generally like Americans, but do not love the segment of the U.S. pop. that pretends that the bit, "they just hate us for our freedoms" is still true. Or, that people are born hating America. This unwillingness to face truth has been catastrophic for the world. The bush admin. is out of control after getting a pass from people who would rather be victims and live in lies, rather than be mature adults who face truth to help themselves.
111banana 4 years ago
So you think the UN should have been allowed to handle it rather then the Bush admin... right?
thain456 4 years ago
The UN was looking into Bush admin.'s(false) claims about WMDs. It was reporting back what later turned out to be the truth. If the US had observed International Law, it wouldn't be in such a mess.
111banana 4 years ago
Your facts are rather fucked-up. The UN didn't both to look very hard.... since the Gulf War the UN failed hands down. Saddam was the one that violated international law.... we had a just cause to invade.... mess? What do you define as a mess? the Iraqi people are much better off then under Saddam.
thain456 4 years ago
The UN had more accurate info. about Iraq than so-called CIA. Here's an example of how twisted your thinking is: America must go an enforce international law that Iraq violated by violating international law. Mess: hundreds of thousands of people maimed or dead for U.S. to take over Iraq's oil supplies.
111banana 4 years ago
Please show me proof that the US was benifited from Iraqi oil.... you are again mis-lead by the liberal press. The northern oil fields have been in contract with Turkish companies for some time now. The UN fabricated information to mis-lead the international community,,,, again your information is incorrect. Saddam violated international law for over 12 years since after the Gulf War and before that... need I tell you?
thain456 4 years ago
Also, Saddam supported international terrorism.... nuclear weapons research, bio and chemical use against the Kurds, Harp project.... etc.
thain456 4 years ago
thain456, may i remind you that Liberals point out that the bush administration lied to the american people, used the 9/11 attacks a reason to get the american people behind a lie. Bush, Rumsfield and Cheney lied to the very people they were supposed to protect. They took advantage of the american people after 9/11 they made up lies to congress and the UN. 9/11 gave them their chance to invade. Fact check thain456, saddam had no ties to al-quaida and had nothing to do with 9/11. Im a Liberal.
CVK92 2 years ago
The U.N. looked into U.S. false claims and presented info. that has not been refuted since. Can U.S. and the bullied CIA say the same? So according to you, U.S. had to enforce international law by breaking international law? "Mess": 100 000's maimed and dead so that U.S. co.'s can take over Iraq's natural resources and YOUR govn't's treasury.
111banana 4 years ago
The UN had good reason to delay the war in Iraq.... they were living on the high-hog there and profiteering since 1991 with nothing to show for it. Most of the Iraqi caualities have been a result of terrorists..... you can't blaim the US for that.... unless you are on the side of terroism.
thain456 4 years ago
actually, you can blame our country for alot of the terrorism going on there now. al qaeda would have never been there if it wasnt for us. But you no, its not ok for a liberal to say that war is wrong, we are un patriotic because we want out, we are on the side of terrorist. But yet a conservative like Bush, Rumsfeild and Cheney can lie and use a terrorist attack as a way to deceive the public into backing a war on a country that had nothing to do with it.
CVK92 2 years ago
Also, Saddam supported international terrorism.... nuclear weapons research, bio and chemical use against the Kurds, Harp project.... etc.
thain456 4 years ago
Visfen, you can't have an intelligent opinion about the situation in Iraq unless you are there, have been there, or are getting *ACCURATE* information. The problem is that you easter bunny have neither. To base your knowledge on the information that is reported is foolish. YOU ARE A FOOL.
thain456 4 years ago
Debate is about presenting facts and philosophies, something you clearly have no interest in doing. My analysis of the situation in Iraq is the same as the experts. It is supported by facts, statistics and experiences from people who have been there. That's the very definition of accurate. You insist that the statistics and facts, experts and the media presents are wrong, with no evidence to support the claim. Foolish is to base your opinion on nothing but arrogance
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, unlike you I base my information on personal experience. What I have witnessed myself and information which is often not public knowledge. Your information is based on what you have read off the internet.... you need help.
thain456 4 years ago
Let's be clear, you were probably in Baghdad, pretty much the only place that is secured in Iraq, and you base your opinion on your little narrow view of what you saw there. Then I come along and I base my information on several sources, many of them being highly decorated military generals that have been in the area of Iraq for 16 years now. And you have the arrogance to say you know better than me, statistics and all the experts? Please, get a fucking clue.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, again you are wrong.... fishing? I guess you might be good at that? I know some of those top generals and have been in briefings with them. History will prove I'm right and your wrong.... go back to fishing you might be better at that.
thain456 4 years ago
No you have not been... You are lying trough your teeth. If you had been "all over" and in meetings with generals your stance on the war should be a little bit more enlighten and a little bit less arrogant. Fishing? Relevance? you're definetly one weird little boy (I'm becoming more and more convinced you're at most 18 years old, and all your stories are lies) Please say something enlightened, something intelligent, something you can prove and fact check and isn't just a spin to fit your agenda.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, so you can just try to disprove me..... so that it fits into your silly twisted liberal mind? LOL... this little 18 year old boy was a guest at Barzani's house and treated like a prince for one weekend. You have know idea what you are talking about and who you are talking too!
thain456 4 years ago
Actually by reading what and how you write I can make a prediction of how old you are. You act as though you're maybe at tops 18. Why would I believe you, you have no proof and everything points to it being a complete fabrication.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, you must be three years old still sucking on your mommy's tit. :b
thain456 4 years ago
Again you prove my point.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, actually you are wrong again.... but this time I wish you were right.... :)
thain456 4 years ago
No, ask Europeans or anyone from the middle east, they will tell you they have nothing against the people but everything against the government. The people of the USA have done nothing to anyone, it's the government policies that enforce a imperialistic agenda over the world, and it's that agenda that have insighted the hatred in so many Muslims. And that's exactly what the 911 commission or CIA will tell you, two extremely conservative groups.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, and by the way I've been all over Iraq and the middle east.... I've been travling my entire life. You should do the same.... it might clear some cobwebs out of your cranial cavity.
thain456 4 years ago
Why? It takes less time to read about 20 people going over all of Iraq, and then my facts are more correct and less subjective.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, facts are not words you read off the internet by the LIBERAL PRESS!
thain456 4 years ago
What Liberal Press? there is no liberal press... and the CIA's own reports are often if anything very conservative.
Visfen 4 years ago
This is not 4 years ago where you could say "well we took down Saddam so the Kurds love us", now they want you to leave, even the Kurds. If you don't know this then please ignore to responds and just be ignorant in silence. I'd prefer it that way. And you have said the war was necessary. Was it? No, there was no imminent threat. And now there is MORE terrorism now than under Saddam's regime. You have spent 500 billion dollars on something that has made you less safe.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, You should go there and learn.... because you my school boy are very wrong.
thain456 4 years ago
And btw, have you been there? And to follow your own logic; Have you been everywhere in Iraq? Have you talked to everyone? Have you lived there all your life?.. one could go on and on with your idiotcracy that the only thing that could ever be true to the facts is first hand experiences. Instead of expanding the debate with your arguments you are shrinking it and making it personal, not subject-related. It's a method often used by people who don't have any facts to back up their opinions.
Visfen 4 years ago
Visfen, I think you are mixing up facts and opinions.... that's a big problem with you.
thain456 4 years ago
Well you are right in that in order to call the war a disaster we have to define failure and success. Let's say we measure success only by the capture of Saddam, then it would be a success. If we however measure success after, Iraq security, Iraq wealth, Iraqi peoples wellbeing, US economy or US security this war comes out as a terrible failure, cause all of those have gone awfully bad. Especially the US economy (deficit of 10 trillion dollars).
Visfen 4 years ago
gravel is your daddy
quest67 4 years ago
h t t p s : / / w w w(dot)ronpaul2008(dot)com/donate/
Please Donate To The Ron Paul Presidential Campaign!!!
blookup 4 years ago
Another dumbass question, but at least it brings attention to the lack of attention Gravel is getting. We are supposed to push for candidates putting forth good policy, not who we think will win.
burningice17 4 years ago
agreed. He speaks the truth. Hope they give him more time in the future.
chadam227 4 years ago
@burning:
concured.
deZazi 4 years ago
obama is a bit fucking too neat,,,smells sell out all over
duderanch111 4 years ago
youtube and CNN have shown the american people just how intelligent they think we are by showing a question like this.
shame on CNN for pandering by choosing such stupid and inadequate questions.
DennnisC 4 years ago
ageed,,, but its america ,,, what do you expect
MrMichuzz 4 years ago
Isn't Obama a member of the Talaban?
thain456 4 years ago
puppydogbreath 4 years ago