Uno de los problemas de la mente es su constante pensar, en ese proceso se forma opiniones rotulos o imagenes, muy a la ligera, tanto de la persona como de los demas y el entorno que lo rodea, una cosa es ver la apariencia y hacer juicios sobre ella y otra cosa es ver la ESENCIA, la cual solo es posible verla en ausencia de la actividad mental, en estado de vacio, esto es lo que lllaman las religones despertar o iluminarse.
The "absolute" is just another abstraction to add to all the others. Krishnamurti was very fixed in his ideologies, and doesn't listen to anything anybody says - in complete contradiction to his teachings. UG Krishnamurti spoke far more sense, except it wasn't as appealing to listen to.
Se caga de risa de lo que le plantean porque es tan ridiculo que queres que haga o diga ...aaaaaaaaa me deje pensar es tan correcto e interesante ser nacionalista hehehehehehehe
Por que te tomas el trabajo de dejar comentarios en algo que esta tan lejo de tus conceptos, vive y deja vivir. El respeto es la base de una sociedad sana.
its not the scientists fault they cant understand K. we must remember they make their living with knowledge, and with the assumptions of thought and the image, experience, belief ect... K is saying the complete opposite so unless yove experienced the absolute it is going to be hard to understand him.
Hi Sclogse! I feel the same. Who are these fellows? they cannot understand even a word from K!!! I hope i'm not misunderestanding but he is trying to disolve identifications with images... the "ego"
Sorry I'm not a spanish speaker...I've read all of K.'s books. What I feel is that these fellows miss the chance to talk about one's nature...along with their image of themselves. Ones' nature...their enthusiasm, their shyness, their restlessness, their natural abiding state of charm or passiveness...outside of their image of themselves....one child is more aggressive than the other....so how does this nature relate to being in direct communication with creation?
Uno de los problemas de la mente es su constante pensar, en ese proceso se forma opiniones rotulos o imagenes, muy a la ligera, tanto de la persona como de los demas y el entorno que lo rodea, una cosa es ver la apariencia y hacer juicios sobre ella y otra cosa es ver la ESENCIA, la cual solo es posible verla en ausencia de la actividad mental, en estado de vacio, esto es lo que lllaman las religones despertar o iluminarse.
william9co 4 months ago
hablar atraves de la mente como herramienta conciente
ramoncasal1 1 year ago
what an incredibly interesting conversation! I wish i could share such a conversation with a person like J.K!
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
Reality is truth is pathless land.
How can one disagree with that? Is there any other way to reach truth?
Can you disagree with the light of the sun; can one not see the light of moon in the darkness of light?
Listening is an art.
aboatesh 2 years ago
exelente video
lerislentia 2 years ago
la verdad carese de comentario
murtypury 3 years ago
gracias por el video!!!!
Nietzsche46 3 years ago 3
The "absolute" is just another abstraction to add to all the others. Krishnamurti was very fixed in his ideologies, and doesn't listen to anything anybody says - in complete contradiction to his teachings. UG Krishnamurti spoke far more sense, except it wasn't as appealing to listen to.
JamesT2K 4 years ago
When he describe thing's it's one thing. It's thinking. When he's silent, he's not what you describe here in your opinion.
creationleb 3 years ago
Esto es una gran pelotudes amigo mio
seguro sos un religioso del mierda
anda a resar asi te sentis mejor
Que comentario tan ridiculo "abstraction"
ignorante empesa a usar tus piernas
Se caga de risa de lo que le plantean porque es tan ridiculo que queres que haga o diga ...aaaaaaaaa me deje pensar es tan correcto e interesante ser nacionalista hehehehehehehe
estemonti 2 years ago
Por que te tomas el trabajo de dejar comentarios en algo que esta tan lejo de tus conceptos, vive y deja vivir. El respeto es la base de una sociedad sana.
claugala 2 years ago 2
its not the scientists fault they cant understand K. we must remember they make their living with knowledge, and with the assumptions of thought and the image, experience, belief ect... K is saying the complete opposite so unless yove experienced the absolute it is going to be hard to understand him.
iaeruo 4 years ago
Thanks iaeruo! Clarifying.
Let's experience the absolute to understand
Gracias! Aclaras.
¡Experimentemos el absoluto para poder comprender!
josebrunello 4 years ago
Hi Sclogse! I feel the same. Who are these fellows? they cannot understand even a word from K!!! I hope i'm not misunderestanding but he is trying to disolve identifications with images... the "ego"
josebrunello 4 years ago
Sorry I'm not a spanish speaker...I've read all of K.'s books. What I feel is that these fellows miss the chance to talk about one's nature...along with their image of themselves. Ones' nature...their enthusiasm, their shyness, their restlessness, their natural abiding state of charm or passiveness...outside of their image of themselves....one child is more aggressive than the other....so how does this nature relate to being in direct communication with creation?
SCLOGSE 4 years ago
¿Podremos dejar de tener imagenes de las personas que nos rodean, y verlas como si fuera la primera vez todos los dias?
emaaida 4 years ago 9